Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1st Quarter
2
Table of Contents
I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….3
A. Background……..……………………………………………………………3
B. Preliminary Decisions……………………………………………………….3
C. Organization of Study……………………………………………………….3
II. Method..……………………………………………………………………………..3
A. Assumptions…………..……………………………………………………..3
B. Population and Sampling Design……………………………………………3
1. Population Response Rate……………………………………….3
C. Questionnaire Design………………………………………………………..3
1. Basic Structure…………………………………………………..3
III. Analysis………………………………………………………………..…………….4
A. Biases and Limitations…………………………………………………...….4
1. Reliability Evaluation……………………………………………...4
2. Examination of Validity……………………………………………4
3. Method of Analysis………………………………………………...4
4. Survey Questions…………………………………………………..4
- Product Lines Ordered………………………………………….5
- Sales People Responses………………………………………...6
- Account Manager/ New Product Manager Responses…………12
- Why GM Nameplate on this order?............................................20
- Overall Experience Responses…………………………………22
- Improve Experience Responses………………………………..32
- Would you recommend GM Nameplate?...................................35
- Trends, Changes, Improvements……………………………….38
- Response by Industry…………………………………………..40
3
I. Introduction
A. Background
Our quarterly customer survey is conducted to draw attention to needed improvements, address
positive and negative methods we currently use, and to identify trends and opportunities. The customer
survey is intended to assist the marketing and sales team to gather important information from customers.
The more frequently conducted customer service-focused surveys will also more fully satisfy ISO-9001:
2000 Quality Management System certification requirements.
B. Preliminary Decisions
The quarterly customer satisfaction survey was sent to the customer only as a survey email. The
content was taken from the previous quarterly customer survey, with only minor changes. Once a rough
draft was compiled by the marketing department, it was reviewed by the upper management prior to its
execution. Suggestions were taken into account as much as possible in the final version of the survey.
C. Organization of Study
Customers of GM Nameplate who had ordered in the previous quarter (February-April 2008) made
up the survey population. The email list was developed from a raw list by Connie Eaton in IT of 855
customers on file.
II. Method
A. Assumptions
The survey was conducted and analyzed under the assumption that the customers being surveyed
understood the questions asked, answered the questions honestly, and had ordered during the months of
February, March, and/or April 2008.
With an original list of 855 emails, 87 of them were removed due to invalid email address or
request to opt out of the survey. The remaining 768 contacts had a response rate of 17%. This
provided a total of 128 valid customer responses.
C. Questionnaire Design
1. Basic Structure
The email that customers received was focused on their needs and how we could better
provide service to them. When users clicked through the email they were presented customer
4
survey questions. Each question had directions to help the customer understand how to answer
each question.
III. Analysis
1. Reliability Evaluation
The scales used in the analysis of the data have been tested and proven in the field of
marketing to give reliable results. The survey data was collected through an online survey that
had explicit and specific instructions for answering each question.
2. Examination of Validity
Before the data analysis was conducted, the independent and dependent variables to be cross-
analyzed were chosen to insure that information gleaned from the data was only the necessary
data needed to make future strategic decisions.
3. Method of Analysis
The data analysis was completed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 16.0, the Statistical
Package for Social Sciences. SPSS makes frequency tallying and cross tabulations simple and
fast. It is a program widely used in market research because of its accurate and efficient data
analysis.
4. Survey Questions
There were a total of 6 questions that were a combination of direct and open ended.
Information collected, is outlined below in detailed color graphs and charts.
The pie graphs in question 1 and question 2 show a significant increase in customers who
responded “N/A (Not Applicable),” as compared to last quarter’s survey. Those who had not
worked with a salesperson (question 1) or an account manager/new product manager (question 2),
and therefore had skipped the following questions were added to the “N/A” option on each
question. Last quarter’s survey did not include these “skipped” responses.
5
Response Response
Answer Options Percent Count
Label 66.7% 84
Nameplate 37.3% 47
Overlay 14.3% 18
Die-cut component 11.9% 15
Membrane switch 2.4% 3
Injection molded component 8.7% 11
Compression molded component 2.4% 3
Plastic decorated component 4.0% 5
Assembly 6.3% 8
Other 7.9% 10
er
n
l
y
e
te
on
be
cu
rla
bl
an
io
h
la
as
La
e-
si
m
ct
Ot
e
ep
br
Pl
es
Di
Ov
je
se
em
m
In
pr
As
Na
m
Co
6
1. Did you work with one of our sales people on this order? Yes No
Response
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Response
Yes No
78% 22%
Responsiveness
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Responsiveness
19%
1
2% 37% 2
3
2%
4
10% 5
N/A (6)
30%
Expertise
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
5 1 .8 .8 79.4
Expertise
21%
1
2
1% 38%
3
2% 4
5
8%
N/A (6)
30%
9
Communication
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Missing 0 2 1.6
Communication
19%
36% 1
2%
2
2% 3
4
12% 5
N/A
29%
10
Issue Resolution
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
4 1 .8 .8 75.2
Missing 0 3 2.3
Issue Resolution
22%
1
39% 2
3
2%
4
1%
5
N/A
10%
26%
11
OverallExperience
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
5 1 .8 .8 80.2
Missing 0 2 1.6
Overall Experience
20%
38% 1
1%
2
2%
3
8% 4
5
N/A
31%
2. Did you work with one of our account managers/new product managers?
Yes No
Response
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
No, 39.7%
Yes, 60.3%
13
Responsiveness
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
4 1 .8 .8 58.7
Responsiveness
35%
1
39%
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
2% 18%
1% 5%
15
5 1 .8 .8 58.7
Expertise
31%
1
42%
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
1% 5% 21%
Communication
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
4 1 .8 .8 58.3
Communication
33%
40% 1
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
2%
1% 4% 20%
Issue Resolution
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Missing 0 7 5.5
Issue Resolution
33%
1
42% 2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
2% 16%
7%
Order Acknowledgement
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 .8 .8 .8
Missing 0 6 4.7
Order Acknowledgment
32%
1
42%
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
2% 21%
3%
Clarity of Quote
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 .8 .8 .8
5 1 .8 .8 60.7
Missing 0 6 4.7
Clarity of Quote
32%
40% 1
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
1%
2% 2%
23%
Overall Experience
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Missing 0 6 4.7
Overall Experience
33%
40% 1
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
2%
5% 20%
Missing No Response 1 .8
1
2
48% 3
4
5
N/A (6)
37%
26
Quote Turnaround
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Quote Turnaround
3% 2%
4%
12%
1
43%
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
36%
27
Lead Time
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
4 1 .8 .8 96.1
Missing No Response 1 .8
Lead Time
4%
1%
20%
37% 1
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
38%
28
Missing 0 5 3.9
Manufacturing/Industry Expertise
7%
2%
9%
1
2
50% 3
4
5
N/A (6)
32%
29
Missing 0 6 4.7
Engineering/Design Assistance
16%
2%
1
44% 2
11% 3
4
5
N/A (6)
27%
30
Value
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
5 1 .8 .8 99.2
Value
1% 1%
4%
20%
40% 1
2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
34%
31
Delivery
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Missing No Response 1 .8
Delivery
5% 2% 1%
11%
1
43% 2
3
4
5
N/A (6)
38%
32
Quality
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Quality
1%
10%
1
2
3
54%
4
35%
5
N/A (6)
33
Overall Experience
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Overall Experience
3% 1%
12%
1
2
47%
3
4
5
N/A (6)
37%
34
-Improvements in red.
CustID Company Response
36310 InterMedia Prints Pvt Considering that we are a relatively small business based out of Mumbai, India
Ltd we
would like if some of the orders (for labels that are custom-built for us, as
opposed
to labels that exist in stock) we send across are serviced a bit more quickly.
38752 Enodis Your responsiveness on specific design and spec issues has been bad.
VERY SLOW. Simple things seem to take forever.
37115 Axiom Worldwide Acknowledge orders quicker. Reduce lead times. Quality is great, but price
reflects it.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Response
No 5.70%
Yes 94.30%
38
Why?
solutions ltd
33917 Vishay Semiconductor GM Nameplate is a good company.
Sdn Bhd
36313 Ideal Industries, Inc. good quality
28860 Fischer Custom Comm. GM Nameplate does good quality labels.
11084 Fluke They are always willing to work with our fluctuating demands
38838 Elkay Manufacturing Customer service and responsiveness
00639 Lutron Electronics Co. Good quality, good customer service, never late on an order
38881 matrix design llc you guys never let me down
36127 Spectra Symbol Standard of quality
Corporation
36866 Newberg MFG Solid company with good product.....just have a very long
leadtime....
11084 Fluke Corp. Quick response
21562 Mikron Infrared, Inc For Customer Service, Quality pricing and delivery
27284 Nelson Nameplate Very nice people to work with.
26261 Anritsu Corp Reliability and quality are excellent.
27314 Microscan Industry Leader, proven track record
29437 Parker SSD Drives Inc. YES - good quality NO -slow response on quotes & lead-time
37237 Noah Precision, LLC Did not believe that the overall experience and product quality
was worth the cost and delivery delay. Sales Representative
presents an excellent "can do" sales pitch not backed up by
overall
pricing, quality and job time completion of your company's
production efforts.
6. Is there anything else you would like to share about your experience, trends
you're seeing in your industry, changes in your business, etc., that will help us
serve you better?
-Improvements in red.
Cust ID Company Response
36310 InterMedia Prints Pvt A special word of thanks for Damian Silva for being extremely
Ltd responsive to our
requirements! And to Karen Mauzey for helping us out of difficult
situations..
29224 Micro Power Electronics Seattle division is slow to respond to requests from us. We order through
36313 Ideal Industries, Inc. high costs are driving us offshore, get an offshore facility.
Responses by Industry
25
20
Percentage (%)
15
10
0
AERO
ELEC
OFF
AUTO
TELE
HOME
MED
USA
AD
FOOD
APPL
INT
SG
COMP
AV
MUS
WINE
CM
TM
IM
Industry
Industry Responses
ELEC 23
CM 21
TM 19
COMP 15
MED 13
AERO 7
IM 6
APPL 3
AV 3
USA 3
AD 2
AUTO 2
MUS 2
TELE 2
WINE 2
FOOD 1
HOME 1
INT 1
OFF 1
SG 1