0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
21 visualizzazioni2 pagine
The debate discussed whether Spanish colonialism was beneficial to the Philippines, with the government arguing it influenced Filipino culture, language, food, and introduced religion, while the opposition argued it imposed beliefs and took away Filipino freedom and power over their land. The closing speakers on both sides provided poor explanations and summaries that lacked substantive arguments to support their positions.
The debate discussed whether Spanish colonialism was beneficial to the Philippines, with the government arguing it influenced Filipino culture, language, food, and introduced religion, while the opposition argued it imposed beliefs and took away Filipino freedom and power over their land. The closing speakers on both sides provided poor explanations and summaries that lacked substantive arguments to support their positions.
The debate discussed whether Spanish colonialism was beneficial to the Philippines, with the government arguing it influenced Filipino culture, language, food, and introduced religion, while the opposition argued it imposed beliefs and took away Filipino freedom and power over their land. The closing speakers on both sides provided poor explanations and summaries that lacked substantive arguments to support their positions.
This house believes that Spanish colonialism is beneficial to the Philippines.
Opening Government Opening Opposition
Prime Minister: Leader of the Opposition: Bongato Alcala Parameters Challenge – greedy way of To the benefits to our culture, food conquering other places and religion Arguments Defined Much was lost by the Filipinos Benefits – advantages of something Alibata was lost or doing something Filipinos lost dignity to have Colonialism – a leader or a group of freedom. Filipinos were forced to leaders in a certain place build churches. Arguments They were forced to change to Our ancestors had no background another religion without listening to in terms of religion and education their stand (why include education?) Michelle: in history, there was no It turned us into what we are now clear religion at first. Isn’t it 1:23 beneficial to have been introduced The explanations were a bit short of to religion? Kara: we already had content. It would have been better if our beliefs she had given more for the Michelle: are these diwatas substantiation of those arguments. structured? Kara: how can they not be structured? They already have the alibata, they already have their system of beliefs. By praising those gods, they have already formed their lifestyle Michelle: How can you call it a religion if it just a mere practice? (she did not answer the question. She went to reiterate the answers and points that were previously mentioned. 3:41 Deputy Prime Minister: Deputy Leader of the Opposition: Yap Adiong Arguments Provided more examples Most of our culture and tradition is Spaniards took away the freedom of influenced by the Spaniards. the Filipinos The words we use in our language Filipinos lost their power as the real are influenced by the Spaniards owner of the land. these were stolen The food we eat are also influenced by the Spaniards. by them. Religion was imposed on the We enjoyed their influences, thus, Filipinos. beneficial to us. 1:13 They have influenced our religion. They have built a strong foundation of faith in the country. Kara: we indeed forgot our language because the Spanish words have now been inserted into our present use of words. Michelle: it is on the influences. We also have deeper language to use, as in the case of Cebuano. We didn’t lose our language. We are just influenced. How can you justify that it is beneficial to the language of the people? We have our own language in every region or area. 4:27 Closing Government Closing Opposition Member: Member: Simila Claros The voice is eventually fading Spanish colonialism is not The words were unclearly spoken recognized in the country The first part of the speech was so Teachers did not teach the students unclear because the words were about Spanish beneficiality. being swallowed by his mouth As I experienced, I did not 1:05 recognize these benefits. Explanations were poor Maybe in other countries, it may be beneficial to them. but to us, it is not. 1:09 Explanations were poor. The way he spoke was also unclear. Whip: Whip: Bersamina Abad Summary Summary What he did was to enumerate the “Summaries made by” is an arguments of the previous speakers, incorrect expression but there were no substantial Summary needs good explanations arguments given to those Michelle: How can you say that arguments Spanish colonialism has not been 1:00 recognized when in fact they have been reflected in our culture, food and tradition? Zia: they forced their religion and belief (this was not really the answer Jahzel: are you saying that there are benefits but they are not recognized? Zia: they are not recognized by it is a fact of history that is adopted )this answer does not make sense Michelle: If they have been adopted, then they have been recognized. Zia: (was not able to respond to the point) 3:26