Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Analyse cases using the child protection laws, DepEd policies, and
algorithm on child protection, as discussed during the training to
sharpen their analysis of these laws and policies and locate their role
vis-a-vis the Child Protection Committee
SESSION 1: An Overview of Case Management and the Protocol for Case Management of
Children Caught in Situations of Abuse and Exploitation
Duration: 4 hours
Methodologies: Structured learning exercise, lecture discussion
Process and
Activity 1. Case Management: Definition, Purpose, Importance, and Use Methodology
Session 1
Facilitate a structured learning exercise, Case Management in Focus: How Activity 1
well do I know this topic? In this activity, the resource person will try to
gauge the participants’ appreciation about case management and enhance Structured
their understanding about the topic. Learning
Exercise
Read a set of 11 statements regarding the subject matter. Lecture-
discussion
Case Management in Focus:
How well do I know this topic?
Highlight the important points that came out of the discussion and add other
significant aspects that did not surface but which they should also know about
the topic.
Woodside and McClam (2003) adopted the meaning of Weil and Karls
(1985, p.2) which is a set of logical steps and a process of interaction
within a service network which assures that a client receives needed
services in a supportive, effective, efficient, and cost-effective manner.
Guided by the case management framework and learning from the previous
lectures on the protocols outlined in the various DepEd issuances on child
protection, the following is a step-by-step guide for Child Protection
Specialists in handling child protection cases in schools:
1. From the receipt of the report, the CPS records all pertinent
information related to the case. He/she reviews the Intake Sheet
accomplished by the school to check if it has been properly filled-up
and contains accurate and relevant information related to the case.
2. Using this preliminary information, the CPS shall assess the nature of
the case. It is essential for the CPS to consider the context
surrounding the incident. This may involve the child’s social history,
how the child understands the situation presented, and the factors that
led to the incident that transpired. By analyzing the context, the CPS
can identify what further risks the child may face outside of the
presented situation. The immediate protection needs of the child or
children involved shall be first taken into consideration.
3. From the initial assessment, the CPS recalls and reviews the
appropriate DepEd policy and protocol that is applicable to the case.
Interventions for both the child offender and victim shall be identified
and designated by the CPC. The offender goes through counselling
or, in some cases, suspension, as recommended by the school head
after considering the nature, gravity or severity, and frequency of
bullying incidents. Appropriate services shall also be given to the child
victim, such as counselling or medical services.
5. Support services that a child requires may extend beyond the realm of
the school or the Department. Such is the case when the CPS shall
utilize the network of government and non-government agencies to
provide the appropriate and essential interventions and services in
instances of complex and serious child protection cases.
The CPS shall advise the schools in the referral of cases to the
following service providers: the barangay, law enforcement agencies -
Philippine National Police (PNP) and National Bureau of Investigation
(NBI), LSWDO, Women and Children Protection Units (WCPU) in
hospitals, non-government organizations, and other relevant agencies.
The Protocol for Case Management of Child Victims of Abuse,
Neglect, and Exploitation highlights the roles of various government
agencies in reporting, responding, and management of child
protection cases, as mandated by R.A. 7610 or the Special Protection
of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act.
It is the role of the school, through the school head, to collaborate with
the aforementioned agencies within the referral pathway and ensure
that the proper services are being given to the child.
The Flowchart
In the discussion of who may report and to whom may one report a case of
child abuse, highlight the fact that while any person may report, either orally
or in writing, teachers and administrators in public schools have the duty to
report all incidents of possible child abuse to official acceptors of reports, as
mandated in R.A. 7610. These are the barangay, PNP/NBI, DSWD or
LSWDO.
Not later than forty-eight (48) hours after receipt of a report on a possible
incident of child abuse, the DSWD or LSWDO shall immediately proceed to
the home or establishment where the alleged child victim is found and
interview said child to determine the following:
The DSWD or LSWDO shall inform the police or other law enforcement
agency whenever a child victim is placed under protective custody. The
social worker shall refer the child who is placed under protective custody to a
government medical or health officer for a medical examination and, if
necessary, medical treatment. Thereafter, the social worker shall determine
the rehabilitation or treatment program which the child may require and to
gather data relevant to the filing of criminal charges against the abuser.
The DSWD or LSWDO shall ask the Court to suspend the parental
authority of the parent or lawful guardian who abused the child victim,
provided, that in cases of sexual abuse, the DSWD or LSWDO shall ask for
the permanent deprivation of parental authority of the offending parent or
lawful guardian.
The barangay, often the nearest place where a child victim or witness of child
abuse may run to and seek assistance, is supposed to designate a child-
and gender-sensitive barangay kagawad or tanod, preferably a female,
who shall be in charge of the barangay help desk. The latter shall
receive and monitor all child abuse cases and refer the child victim to
the proper agency for appropriate intervention.
Depending on specific circumstances, the barangay should contact the
DSWD or LSWDO within 24 hours and refer the case to the social
worker for validation of complaint and assessment. If the LSWDO is
unavailable and the case seemed to be high risk, the child shall be directly
endorsed to the punong barangay, a city/provincial crisis center, or a non-
government organization’s temporary shelter for an emergency overnight or
weekend placement. Thereafter, a report stating such endorsement to a crisis
center or temporary shelter shall be made by the barangay to LSWDO.
After a brief orientation on the case analysis process, review the guide
questions which should serve as overall guidance for the group work
on each case:
Guide Questions/Task:
1. What key terms and concepts are relevant to understanding this
case?
2. What is the basic child protection law that you can invoke in this
case?
3. What applicable DepEd policies on child protection, as well as
prohibited acts, are being illustrated in this case?
4. How should you proceed in managing this case? Cite specific
roles and procedures that should be followed in managing this
case. Cite specific interventions indicated in DepEd’s policy
document, as well as the Protocol for Case Management of
Child Victims of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation as applicable.
5. Fill up an intake sheet for your assigned case.
SET ONE
Case 2. Half of the high school students in a rural area were observed
to be frequently absent, especially during the rice planting season. On
the days when they come to school, sometimes they “cut” classes and
leave the school premises. Many of the boys have wounds on their
hands and arms and have a hard time concentrating in class. The
students were often inattentive and fall asleep, especially in the
afternoon classes.
During one lunch break, while teachers went out for lunch (and
deliberately left some valuables inside the teachers’ room), a 16-year
old female student sneaked in and took mobile phones and other
personal items she found inside the room. Unaware that this was a
trap set up by concerned school authorities, the girl was immediately
prevented from leaving the school premises and was taken to the
principal for questioning.
Case 5. A group of high school boys and girls were often seen hanging
out in the school garden after school hours. While their behavior has
not really caused much concern, the school guard has been on the
alert for any disturbance the group might cause.
One day, the guard noticed that the group was unusually rowdy and
the area has a strange smell. Some of the students were seen to be
engaging in inappropriate sexual behavior. He approached the group
and was offered cigarettes and something that looks like a prohibited
drug. The guard resisted but was cajoled by the group to participate.
When he tried to assert his authority, the group quickly left the
premises while shouting offensive words directed towards him. Reports
confirmed that the group was indeed taking prohibited drugs within the
school compound.
Case 6. Ana is 12 years old and is living with her mother and her 15-
year-old brother. Her brother is in Grade 9 and goes to the same
school as her. Ana’s brother is a smoker and has a habit of watching
pornographic materials. Whenever her mother leaves for work, her
brother would sexually abuse her. He threatened her and said that if
Ana discloses to her mother, he will hit her. Ana is so afraid of her
brother, she did not tell anyone. The abuse occurred several times over
the course of one month.
Upon hearing this, Mrs. X and the student went to the house so they
can talk to Marissa and convince her to come home.
SET TWO
Case 4. A female high school student went home late after doing a
project with her classmates. Outside her classmate’s house, a group of
five boys were hanging out. They were familiar to her since two of them
were from the same school. However, the other three do not go to
school. The boys volunteered to escort the girl out of the side street to
the highway. Unfortunately, the girl was taken by force and was gang-
raped. The boys threatened the girl to not tell anybody or else she will
be killed. Despite the threat, the girl managed to tell her mother. The
group of boys were also allegedly involved in a murder case of a
transgender in town.
Case 7. A student was reprimanded for using his mobile phone inside the
classroom. The second time the student took out his mobile phone, his
teacher decided to confiscate it. It was returned to the student at the end of
the school day and in the presence of the student’s parent. However, after
returning the mobile phone, the teacher began to receive threatening text
messages from the student whose phone was confiscated. This student is a
member of a notorious gang.
Case 8. Roel is a 13-year old, Grade 5 student who lives in an urban poor
settlement in their area. He learned about gambling at an early age from his
neighbors. Eventually, Roel started to cut classes. He would sneak out of the
school with his classmates to play hantak (gambling using coins). Sometimes,
they would play just outside of the school gate to the consternation of their
teachers. One day, one of the teachers notified the barangay tanods, who
brought Roel to the barangay outpost located just a short distance from the
school. He was eventually released after being lectured about the evils of
gambling and warned him that if he engaged in gambling again, the tanods
would arrest and file a case against him. However, after several days, Roel
was caught by one of his teachers playing hantak again outside of the school.
Activity 2. Culminating Group Reporting on the Cases