Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The conflict has given rise to situations where it gets difficult for people or groups to
work together. It appears in every profession. To form better working conditions
Conflict management is required. Nearly all working places will display some extent
of conflict over time, hence we'd like various conflict resolution strategies to mitigate
such conflicts.
Unions are our employees, and ultimately, all of the groundwork is handled by them.
We must understand their expectations, ease their anxiety, and earn their trust. If in
the end, we fail to solve conflict productively, our employees will lose trust in us, and
further, they will fail their ability to work collectively and divert from the
organization's success. Therefore, we must cater to the conflict before it starts
affecting the productivity of our organisation. Conflicts are often encountered in the
following forms in –
Withdraw/Avoid
Smooth/Accommodate
Compromise/Reconcile
Force/Direct
Collaborate/Problem Solve
Withdraw or Avoid
In this conflict resolution technique, we avoid the conflict & permit it to resolve
itself. This method is helpful when stakes are low and it's likely the conflict will
disappear on its own as this technique saves time that we can invest in other
productive activities. This technique will not be useful in this scenario because,
individuals involved in the conflict are major stakeholders. The
issue doesn't require an excellent time investment but proper attention. Withdrawing
or avoiding conflict may weaken our position as a project manager because parties
might imagine we're lacking skills and aren't authoritative. In this scenario,
escaping isn't an answer.
Smooth or Accommodate
In this conflict resolution technique we deal with finding areas of agreement and tries
to smooth things and avoids tough discussions. In smoothing, we give more
consideration to at least one party than the opposite. Here this’d try to soften the
seriousness and behave as if the matter never existed. This would bring biasness and
in this scenario, escaping isn't an answer.
Advantages
Disadvantages
Compromise or Reconcile
Advantages
This technique brings quick results, lothes stress, and keeps all parties placated
until we'll be able to find a permanent solution. We’ll be able to solve a conflict and
gain enough time to seek out an improved solution.
Disadvantages
This technique doesn't generate trust within the long run; all parties remain
unsatisfied, and also the conflict could resurface at any time. The moral isn't being
built. We’ll be required to interfere sooner to form sure that each one party abide by
the agreement.
Force or Direct
Here we believe one party’s viewpoint and enforce their wishes. This can be a win-
lose situation and risks demoralizing the other team.
Advantages
This technique provides a fast solution to the matter. It requires almost no effort from
the project manager, and it should help establish the project manager’s authority.
Disadvantages
Advantages
We have explained all of the conflict resolution techniques and the way we'll be able
to use them. However, as a project manager, we have got to retort rationally and
reach a point which best serves the situation.
2. Employee Motivation:
As an external consultant to M/s Polestar & Co. I've observed that employees are currently
unsatisfied with the policies of the corporate & furthermore, plenty of employees are leaving
the organization and therefore to motivate existing employees & get hold of recent talent from
the marketplace we first have to understand why employee motivation is very important –
Why important? –
Feeling safe and guarded could be a basic human need and since work forms such a
key and vital a part of our lives, it’s no surprise that feeling safe and secure at work is
serious to wellbeing.
After we don’t feel secure at work, we feel lonely, trust can break down, connecting
with others becomes harder and we find it tougher to be productive.
A scarcity of job security can cause discomfort and anxiety for workers. It mentally
devastates an employee.
Most of them have a fear of the unknown, and the lack of job security strengthens
these feelings.
Lower turnover: Fit and healthy employees thrive the business, engage more, enjoy
their work to the fullest, and likely to look for one more job.
More productive and hardworking: Promoting health at work can make an employee
more productive, too. Taking care of employees will lead them to further take good
care of the business.
3. IBM stands for International Business Machines Corporation is a multinational giant that
operates in the technology sector. It is headquartered in New York in the United States.
The SWOT Analysis is a strategic tool to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities
and threats related to the business. IBM’s strengths and weaknesses are internal strategic
factors that determine capabilities and challenges built on the organization’s characteristics.
For example, the company’s global operations facilitate economies of scale that strengthens
the business against competitors. On the other hand, the opportunities and threats in IBM’s
business are external strategic factors that reflect the situation of the information technology
industry and the markets where the business operates.
The internal strategic factors that support or promote business growth and resilience are
identified in this element of the SWOT analysis of IBM. These factors are strengths that
continue to support the company in its more than 100 years of business operations in the
global information technology industry. IBM can achieve further growth and development by
adding to or improving the following business strengths:
High-value brand
The IBM brand is one of the strongest in the global information technology market. The
brand’s value is based on product popularity and time-tested effectiveness, and the company’s
expertise in providing hardware and software solutions to clientele. This internal factor
empowers the company to successfully attract and retain customers for current and new
products. Another strength is IBM’s expertise in production processes and materials
management. Such expertise is based on a long history of innovation, which shapes the
company’s business strategies and human resource development programs for IBMers’ talent
and skills, and influences the development of the industry. IBM’s organizational culture also
contributes to this strength. In addition, the company benefits from its extensive intellectual
property portfolio. For example, having one of the highest numbers of patents strengthens the
company and its competitive advantage. On the other hand, the high economies of scale
contribute to business capabilities in maintaining competitiveness despite the high costs of
developing new technological products. This element of the SWOT analysis shows that IBM
has major strengths that can keep the business growing despite tough competition.
IBM’s Weaknesses (Internal Strategic Factors)
In this element of the SWOT analysis, the internal strategic factors that reduce or limit IBM’s
business performance are determined. These factors are weaknesses that the company must
overcome through strategic initiatives or reforms in business operations and processes. In the
context of the information technology market, IBM must address the following weaknesses:
Imitable products
The weakness of the imitability of products is based on the cost leadership generic strategy
(Read: IBM’s Generic Strategy & Intensive Growth Strategies). In this strategy, the company
focuses on cost minimization in business processes. However, the strategy is applied with
minimal emphasis on product uniqueness. As a result, it is easy for competitors to develop
technological products similar to those of IBM. The company also has the weakness of a
shrinking product mix. This internal factor is based on recent strategic reforms that aim to
focus the business on core operations with high profitability potential. For example, the
company sold its personal computer business to Lenovo in 2005. In relation, IBM has a low
degree of diversification. This weakness pertains to the company’s operations in only a
limited number of markets within the information technology industry, leading to high risks
based on these markets. This issue has even worsened because of the firm’s shrinking product
mix. This element of the SWOT analysis of IBM reveals potential difficulties of growing the
business and shielding it from market-based risks.
The external strategic factors that contribute to favorable conditions for business growth are
identified in this element of the SWOT analysis of IBM. These factors are opportunities
linked to changes in the information technology industry and related markets, such as the
transformation of the dominant technological strategies used in the market. The following are
opportunities for the growth of IBM’s business:
In this element of the SWOT analysis, the external strategic factors that decrease or restrict
IBM’s growth are determined. These factors threaten the company in terms of potential
failure in strategy implementation. They also make it difficult for the business to maximize
revenues and profits in the information technology industry. IBM needs to implement
measures to protect its business from the following threats in the external environment:
Imitation of products
Competition
Cybercrime
Imitation of products is an issue that faces IBM. This threat is based on the weakness of
product imitability, which is due to the company’s focus on cost leadership with minimal
product uniqueness. On the other hand, the threat of competition is significant because of the
degree of differentiation and aggressiveness of firms in the information technology industry
(Read: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis of IBM). Also, cybercrime is a significant threat,
especially because of the company’s extensive online operations involving servers for its
clientele. For example, cloud platform products expose the firm and its clientele to potential
cyber attacks and related risks. In this element of the SWOT analysis of IBM, threats are a
major concern that could bring down the business and its technological infrastructure.
The results of this SWOT analysis of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
enumerates internal and external strategic factors that support long-term business survival.
For example, the company has an extensive intellectual property portfolio that contributes to
competitive advantage against other information technology firms. In addition, IBM has a
high-value brand that strengthens the business against competitors and new entrants. Also,
this strength can support the company in diversifying its business and entering other
industries.
Despite IBM’s strengths and positive position in the industry, there are considerable
challenges based on the weaknesses of the business, and the opportunities and threats in the
external environment. For example, the company faces the threat of competition and
experiences the weakness of the imitability of its products. It is necessary to make some
strategic changes to ensure the fulfillment of IBM’s vision statement and mission statement,
which emphasize value and technological breakthrough. Such changes must contribute to the
company’s continued growth and competitive advantage. Based on these factors identified in
the SWOT analysis, it is recommended that IBM:
Enter alliances with firms from other industries to exploit technological integration
opportunities.
Diversify the business to spread risk and reduce risk exposure in the information technology
market.
Reform innovation processes to raise product uniqueness and improve the advantage of
products against imitation and competition.
3. B.
Types-
1. Functional
The functional structure is based on an organization being divided up into smaller groups
with specific tasks or roles. Each department has a manager or director who answers to an
executive a level up in the hierarchy who may oversee multiple departments.
Advantage of this structure is employees are grouped by skill set and function focus their
collective energies on executing their roles as a department. Disadvantage is the lack of
inter-departmental communication, with most issues and discussions taking place at the
managerial level among individual departments.
2. Matrix
In the matrix structure, employees may report to two or more bosses depending on the
situation or project. Advantages of this structure is that employees can share their
knowledge across the different functional divisions, allowing for better communication
and understanding. On the other hand, reporting to multiple managers may add
confusion and conflict between managers over what should be reported. And if priorities
are not clearly defined, employees, too, may get confused about their roles.
3. Divisional
This structure allows for much more autonomy among groups within the organization.
One example of this is a company like General Electric. GE has many different divisions
including aviation, transportation, currents, digital and renewable energy, among others.
Under this structure, each division essentially operates as its own company, controlling its
own resources and how much money it spends on certain projects or aspects of the
division.
Merits –
a. Clear accountability,
b. Separate strategic and operational control,
c. Divisional managers can concentrate on responsible area and can improve
performance,
d. Enhances ability to respond quickly to changes in external environment,
e. Enhances development of general managerial talent,
f. Leads to competitive spirit within the organisation,
g. Allows new business and new products to be added easily.
Limitations-
a. It can be very expensive, due to requirement of functional specialists,
duplication of staff services, facilities and personnel and better qualified
divisional managers,
b. Chance of differences in image and quality may occur across divisions,
c. There is an urge to focus on short-term performance, because divisional
performance is measured on ROI and revenue growth.
IBM has a product-type divisional organizational structure. The main characteristic of this
type of organizational structure is the representation of business processes involved in
managing the development, production, distribution and sale of products. For example,
product-type divisions are a primary structural feature that determines how the business
addresses opportunities in the information technology market. Thus, the company’s
corporate structure supports strategies and tactics that push for competitive products. The
following characteristics define IBM’s corporate structure:
1. Product-type divisions
2. Function-based segments
3. Geographical divisions
3.1. Americas
3.2. Europe/Middle East/Africa
3.3. Asia Pacific