Page 1

1
2
3 PM Mr Scott Morrison 30-6-2020
4 Forwarded via email
5
6 20200630-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to PM Mr SCOTT MORRISON-
7 Re THE CONSEQUENCES OF OUR DECISIONS
8 Scott,
9 as a great grandfather and senior citizen I for one learned that decisions I made in life are
10 not just affecting me but also my descendants beside possibly at times my wife also.
11
12 We had many protest and well the Framers of the Constitution embedded “POLITICAL
13 LIBERY” into Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
14 However, we should always keep in mind that any person seeking to exercise his/her liberty is
15 bound to respect equally the rights of others to have their liberty. As such, one cannot pursue
16 draconic demands that denies others their constitutional rights.
17
18 I was born as a Caucasian in The Netherlands but often during childhood was referred to “aap”
19 in English “monkey” by fellow Caucasian schoolchildren. I endured this not to some pleasure
20 but that is often how people are between each other. Nothing to do with racism.
21 One of my daughters (at the time I was a single male parent) being a aunty of 5 nieces and
22 nephews of which father was of Aboriginal descent I held would do better to have some contact
23 with Aboriginals and so we would often visit Aboriginals in Melbourne. For years on end we
24 never had a single conflict with any of them. However later others I didn’t know personally were
25 writing to me and well their conduct was in my view very offensive. Others I did happen to meet
26 even expressed total opposition to anyone not being Aboriginal and making known that all non-
27 Aboriginals should be killed but first the females raped and tortured. At time referring to how
28 this is being done in South Africa. I wisely didn’t seek to engage in any argument but rather was
29 interested to discover, without asking about it, why they had this kind of perception. To some of
30 them any non-Aboriginal is deemed a murderer regardless if they in recent years came from
31 other countries. As such their “racist” views were overwhelming against anyone who was not of
32 Aboriginal heritage regardless that the person(s) had nothing to do with whatever happened in
33 the past in Australia. I learned by mere listening that the aim was to slowly corrupt the
34 government to get more and more rights until there would be a final take over.
35
36 Just consider your daughters (or their children) to become victims of those contemplating their
37 kind of massacre! Yet this is a reality that you and other politicians are in my view aiding and
38 abetting to.
39
40 https://nysappeal.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/n.d.n.y._1_20-cv-00651-gls-djs_35_0.pdf
41 Federal Court Holds NY's Covid-inspired Restrictions on Religious Gatherings Unconstitutional
42 "Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio could have just as easily discouraged protests, short of condemning
43 their message, in the name of public health and exercised discretion to suspend enforcement for public safety
44 reasons instead of encouraging what they knew was a flagrant disregard of the outdoor limits and social
45 distancing rules," Judge Sharpe wrote. "They could have also been silent. But by acting as they did, Governor
30-6-2020 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio sent a clear message that mass protests are deserving of preferential
2 treatment."
3
4 We had the recent protest of the so called “BLACK LIVES MATTER” and we had Premier
5 Daniel Andrews making clear that I recommended not to attend but if they did they would not be
6 fined. This is in my view the equivalent of the police to say not to be speeding but if you do you
7 will not be fined. As such, basically giving endorsement to violate legal provisions. Reality is
8 that “BLACK LIVES MATTER” is a as I understand a well funded political movement that
9 received hundreds of millions of dollars each year to do what they are doing. The video “Are
10 You Ready for The Great Reset” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joUlWybJvHY gives some
11 set out as to some of its funding.
12
13 Why would any politicians support “BLACK LIVES MATTER” to me a racist organisation
14 when “all lives matter” should be their concern.
15 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16166/christians-butchered
16 "32,000 Christians Butchered to Death": The Persecution of Christians, May 2020
17
18 Let it be clear those are generally Black skinned Christians tortured and mass murdered by other
19 black skinned persons. Yet, this ‘BLACK LIVES MATTER” or its supporters do not make that
20 an issue at all. As such the wording “BLACK LIVES MATTER” is an empty slogan that really
21 has no real meaning. Very much to me at least with those claiming to be of Aboriginal descent
22 claiming to be the “First Nation” but when it comes to assisting other of their alleged “FIRST
23 NATION” they are nowhere to be found other than mere hollow words.
24 I migrated to Australia in 1971 and had various persons claiming to be of Aboriginal descent
25 calling me a “murderer” seemingly merely because I am “white skinned”. If I did the same to
26 those claiming to be Aboriginals then well racial claims be made against me, this regardless if
27 they are actually descendants of murderers.
28 Australia’s first formal law was the Dutch law when the captain and his crew in the early 1600’s
29 shipwrecked in what is now called Western Australia. As French logbooks indicated that they
30 witnessed copper colour persons with blond hair and huts similar to Dutch huts and land
31 cultivated. As such, some Aboriginal groups may have DNA linked to the Dutch seafarers who
32 shipwrecked. It is therefore not at all strange that because of the DNA you might come across
33 “white skinned” Aboriginals as they inherited this from the Dutch seafarers who may have
34 fathered children with women of Aboriginal descent.
35 And many claim that we all are descendants from those who originally lived in Africa. Just that
36 we may have ended up in Australia in different times. To the best of my knowledge, there is no
37 written records of which Aboriginal tribes were the first to come into what is now called
38 Australia, but where I understand there was conflict between tribes and genocide of some of
39 them we really cannot accept that all tribes are the “First Nation” because no such nation existed.
40 They to my understanding had no common language or tradition. Much is claimed about some
41 purported Aboriginal flag but reality is at least to my understanding that prior to even Federation
42 there never was one united Aboriginal nation. Neither one Aboriginal language or customs and
43 traditions. As like in Europe there are numerous Caucasians groups but they may have different
44 languages and traditions and may also be separated by now established State boundaries.
45 Racism is practiced at least in my view by the unelected judges of the High Court of Australia
46 where despite the Constitution provides that the Commonwealth has legislative powers as to
47 “influx of criminals” the High Court of Australia nevertheless made I view a racial decision that
48 those criminals born in New Zealand nevertheless cannot be deported if Australian Aboriginals
49 accepted them as being their group. We heard plenty about people identifying themselves as not
50 just being a male or female but now to whatever. As I wrote about in the past we have a “white
51 women” (Caucasian) identifying herself of being a “woman of colour” and well now all a non-

30-6-2020 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 Aboriginal is to do is to identify himself/herself being Aboriginal and well the constitution is no

2 more to be used.
3 .
4 We have Kamala Harris US Congress a self-proclaimed woman of colour as I understand it
5 making clear that slavery is deplorable and supporting BLACK LIVES MATTER. Yet her own
6 family history, as published by her father, is that her family is from Africa but were selling
7 slaves. That I view underlines the hypocritical conduct of someone supporting BLM while her
8 family was deeply involved in selling slaves!
9 I view it should be promoted that “ALL LIVES MATTER”!
10
11 QUOTE The Black Dilemma: 150 Years of Race Failure – Whites SICK TO DEATH of Black issues
12 The Black Dilemma: 150 Years of Race Failure – Whites SICK TO DEATH of Black issues
13
14 Brilliant: USA: The Black Dilemma: 150 Years of Race Failure – Whites SICK TO DEATH of Black
15 issues
16 27th June 2020 jlamprecht 163 Views 0 Comments
17 [One of my supporters sent this to me with his comments. This is excellent. Nice to see people getting sick of
18 this. As we whites in Africa have been saying: these blacks are not worth much. They are a waste of time. In
19 the article below the "elites" can be translated into what it is: JEWS. What delights me is the part about
20 whites getting sick to death of these blacks. All your kindness to blacks, and your liberalism, has been
21 WASTED on these people. You're throwing pearls after swine. Ditto for Jews. Whites need to take America
22 back … just as whites must take the West back. It's either their (crazy/dangerous) power, or our power. Take
23 your choice. I would rather we have the power than be eternal victims of this race of idiots. Jan]
24 "The Baltimore Sun" is definitely not known as a Conservative newspaper, so this very well written
25 assessment of the situation in USA comes as something of a surprise.
26 THIS IS THE MOST POSITIVELY SPOT ON ASSESSMENT OF “OUR CIVIL SITUATION” TODAY,
27 NO GLITTERING GENERALITIES OR HOLDING BACK IN BEING KIND, CARING, GENTLE,
28 TOUCHY FEELY COMPASSIONATE ASSESSMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!
29 The Black Dilemma
30 "For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the
31 experiment: black people and working-class whites.
32 The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully
33 integrated as citizens in a majority white population? The whites were descendants of Europeans who had
34 created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and
35 virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government
36 released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with
37 racial discord ever since.
38 Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they
39 could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the
40 result they wanted. They created the Freedmans Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great
41 Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight
42 basketball. Their new laws intruded into people’s lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable.
43 They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association.
44 Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice-versa.
45 They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless hand wringing to close the
46 achievement gap. To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements
47 on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to Celebrate Diversity! and Say No
48 to Racism. Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.
49 Some thought that what W.E.B. DuBois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A
50 group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were
51 capable of.
52 There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors
53 and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed
54 by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is
55 missing.
56 Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture
57 unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black
58 cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their
59 failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.

30-6-2020 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles,
2 Cincinnati, and Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us
3 that this doesn’t mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more
4 time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities. But nothing changes no matter how much
5 money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on
6 TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue it’s a problem of culture, as if culture creates people’s
7 behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame white privilege.
8 But since 1965, when the elites opened Americas doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India
9 people who are not white, not rich, and not connected have quietly succeeded. While the children of these
10 people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black youths are committing half the
11 country’s violent crime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of
12 it that has nothing to do with poverty.
13 The experiment has failed. Not because of white culture, or white privilege, or white racism. The
14 fundamental problem is that American black culture has evolved into an un-fixable and crime ridden mess.
15 They do not want to change their culture or society, and expect others to tolerate their violence and amoral
16 behavior. They have become socially incompatible with other races by their own design, not because of the
17 racism of others – but by their own hatred of non-blacks.
18 Our leaders don’t seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment.They don’t
19 understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are
20 exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the
21 bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity. The elites explain everything with
22 racism, and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point."
23 Ian Duncan
24 The Baltimore Sun
25 END QUOTE The Black Dilemma: 150 Years of Race Failure – Whites SICK TO DEATH of Black issues
26
27 Science is what scientist may proclaim to be but this can change not just by year or by month or
28 even by week or day but even by the minute. If as some suggest Australia (as now known) was
29 part of Asia but slowly drifted away then in time we may very well discover remains of humans
30 who lived here long before any person claiming to be of Aboriginal descent resided in this area.
31 .
32 Not long after I arrived in Victoria I understood there were Aboriginal groups pursuing that old
33 Aboriginal names in the Grampians should be changed because the old tribes had died out and so
34 the names desired by the later tribes should replace the old tribes names. That underlines to me
35 the real lack of respect for the original tribes. And, then somehow we are not just expected but
36 demanded to respect them? If we all are originally descendants of the same group of people of
37 East Africa area then why should some descendants have more rights than others?
38 One person claiming to be an “elder” of Aboriginals claimed that any person who even had a
39 single drop of blood of Aboriginals was an Aboriginal. So, anyone who was to have blood
40 transfusion of a person of Aboriginal descent then would be an Aboriginal?
41
42 I migrated to Australia and my issue was to learn the law of the land being the Commonwealth
43 of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) despite I had no formal education in the English
44 language. And, well I learned that the Framers of the Constitution made clear Aboriginals within
45 Section 41 of the constitution were equal to any other Australian. Aboriginals who had State
46 franchise were and did vote in the first federal election in 1901.
47 Once thing that did strike me was that while the election was held within 3 months as required
48 but the elected representatives did in fact not take up their seats until the writs were returned and
49 that means that in violation of s64 of the constitution the persons who were commissioned as
50 Ministers (Edmund Barton, etc) actually were no longer forming a government when the 3
51 months has passed. This, as they had not been members of Parliament as required to be within 3
52 months of being commissioned as a Minister. Our constitution doesn’t provide for any person to
53 be elected to be a Minister as long as the person is not longer than 3 months a Minister. The
54 Governor-General as he did with commission Edmund Barton and the 6 others can commission
55 anyone not being a Member of Parliament to any Ministerial position, however Section 64
30-6-2020 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 demands that after 3 months the person must be a Member of parliament. As neither Edmund
2 Barton or the other 6 persons acting as Ministers were sworn in prior to the 3 month expiring it
3 means that constitutionally they no longer formed any government.
4 And for what it is worth where the Commonwealth of Australia is a registered corporation with
5 the District of Columbia, which is a district under the USA Senate control then this means any
6 Minister in the Commonwealth of Australia serving to the demands of the District of Columbia
7 is in violation of S44 of the constitution and therefore ineligible to be a Member of Parliament.
8
9 As I also pointed out in my 19-7-2006 successful appeals ADDRESS TO THE COURT County
10 Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka that the
11 2001 purported federal election was held 1 week to early and as such not a single candidate for
12 the House of Representatives was validly elected. Meaning that John Hoard was neither validly
13 elected. It also means that after the 3 months period he no longer was Prime Minister, nor others
14 of the House of Representatives were Ministers. Again, I succeeded in both appeals without a
15 single Attorney-General challenging my numerous constitutional issues I raised in the litigation.
16 I also opposed successfully that “compulsory” voting was unconstitutional. While at times I do
17 vote (voluntarily) it is when I consider there is a worthy candidate to vote for. As I made clear to
18 the Court there is no such constitutional power for the Commonwealth to create some kind of
19 “Australian Citizenship” as a nationality because all citizens of a State are “automatically”
20 Australian citizens regardless of their nationality. Again, none of the Attorney-Generals
21 challenged this. And as such where I had a formal legal objection that the legislation was
22 unconstitutional and so ULTRA VIRES AB INITIO then this remains to be so unless and until
23 if ever at all a court of competent jurisdiction declares it to be intra vires. For the record the
24 Magistrates Court of Victoria issued (by consent) an order for the High Court of Australia to
25 hear and determine the NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER, however so far the
26 High Court of Australia never did so. As such clearly the purported Australian Citizenship Act is
27 without legal foundation and legal force!
28
29 This brings us back to Subsection 51(xxvi) which was specifically created to
30 “DISCRIMINATE” against people of colour who were deemed to be inferior aliens but not to
31 include Aboriginals.
32 Obviously people of Aboriginal groups arrived to what is now Australia over different times and
33 via different routes and so their DNA from one group to another can be very different. One
34 cannot therefore claim they are “First Nation” on this basis also because “Aboriginals” are also
35 residing in Canada, etc. And we have Torres Strait Islanders whom never were excluded from
36 Ss51(xxvi). My understanding from the Hansard Constitution Conventions Debates is that the
37 Framers of the Constitution held that a “race” was relating to a “group” of people who had
38 certain identifications amongst them. The Afghans were referred to as an example. Subsection
39 51(xxvi) was very much also directed against those from India who had British nationality. It
40 was held undesirable to have this kind of influx.
41 While the Framers of the Constitution inserted Section 127 in the constitution this was not per se
42 against Aboriginals but rather as to the State contribution in taxes.
43 For all purposes and intent Section 25 of the constitution permitted the States to discriminate
44 against any race as to franchise but the Commonwealth only could do so regarding an alien race
45 who it was deemed to be inferior coloured race. Essentially, to keep them out of Australia and/or
46 to prevent them to have the same rights as other Australians. The Chinese with gold mining was
47 an issue. As such as was made clear in advise to the Commonwealth Government in the 1950’s it
48 was unwise to have Aboriginals to be part of Ss51(xxvi) because it was distinctly created to
49 “DISCRIMINATE” against a race. It then had to be against all persons of that race, not
50 selectively like the unconstitutional Intervention.

30-6-2020 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1 https://newmatilda.com/2020/06/28/abcs-fake-anonymous-youth-worker-promoted-to-high-
2 commissioner-of-ghana/
3 As the Framers of the Constitution made clear that the moment any legislation was enacted
4 within Subsection 51(xxvi) against any race then those persons of that race would lose their
5 franchise. Hence, since legislation was enacted against Aboriginals within Ss51(xxvi) then
6 constitutionally Aboriginals has no franchise rights and neither can be Members of any
7 Australian Parliament.
8 I understand that Ken Wyatt identifies of being of Aboriginal descent and yet I understand he
9 supported the destruction of Aboriginal historical rock formations. Somehow, he appears to
10 claim that it is a matter for the Aboriginals to decide amongst themselves. Well, to me if it is part
11 of Australian heritage that it should not be destroyed. But to me this indicates again that if a non-
12 Aboriginal was to pursue destruction then it would be “racism” but the same destruction by those
13 claiming to be Aboriginals then well the historical value is sold out for the offer of monies. That
14 may just underscore the DOUBLE STANDARDS that are applied.
15 Then we have this issue about EQUALITY but well, Subsection 51(xxvi) cannot be used
16 against the “general community”. Then where it is only to “DISCRIMINATE” against a
17 certain race, then obviously the mere inclusion of Aboriginals cannot alter the meaning of this
18 Subsection 51(xxvi). The meaning of the Subsection doesn’t have opposite meanings pending to
19 which race it refers as it has one constant meaning regardless as to which race it refers to. This
20 means that by the successful 1967 (I view Con-Job) referendum technically Aboriginals are not
21 equal to any inferior coloured alien race. That to me was not what was intended with the
22 referendum but then again because at the time the High Court of Australia, albeit wrongly,
23 refused to allow the usage of the Hansard Constitutional Convention Debates it resulted to all
24 kinds of misconceptions and even as I understand judicial decisions violating the true meaning
25 and application of the constitution.
26 ………… But wait there is more!
27 The purported Racial Discrimination Act cannot be used in conflict to Ss51(xxvi) and as such is
28 also unconstitutional.
29 We have however all kinds of legal provisions well purported legal provisions such as the States
30 legislating as to Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders this even so the Framers of the
31 Constitution made clear that once the Commonwealth commenced to legislate on any subject to
32 which it was granted legislative powers then the States have to retire form this. As such, any
33 “concurrent” legislative power only existed until the Commonwealth commence to legislate
34 upon a subject matter. Section 109 is that where the Commonwealth legislate and where already
35 existing State laws then the Commonwealth law would prevail. It means that the “Koori” court
36 in Victoria is unconstitutional and so any other legislation specifically referring to “Aboriginals”
37 because the States since the 1967 referendum lost that legislative power. You cannot have
38 “equality” when you provide special provisions for a certain race. While personally, I grew up
39 that all people are equal regardless of race or colour of skin, etc, as a constitutionalist however I
40 must show what the Framers of the Constitution were about and the legal principles embedded in
41 the constitution regardless of it may conflict with my personal views.
42 However, we have clearly racist politicians who are supporting protest in violation to
43 rules/regulations when it comes to those protesting about BLACK LIVES MATTER but will
44 fine say a parent taking a child to the beach regardless if no one else is there. Politicians are so to
45 say willing to sell out their own mothers grave if they deem it politically useful to them.
46
47 There was a video and other reports which indicated that despite some 315 protest/riots in USA
48 cities no significant increase existed in regard of the COVID-19 issue. Which exposes that the
49 LOCKDOWNS were a gross abuse of power causing more harm (including economical harm)
50 then good. Ample of claims are made in various ways (video’s/news articles) that the

30-6-2020 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1 LOCKDOWN was a political stunt misusing the COVID-19 for this purpose to pursue a One
2 World Order doctrine as apparently was agreed to by about 167 nations in 1992
3 As the Framers of the Constitution made clear that the Commonwealth can enter in treaties but
4 they do not bind citizens. Obviously, any treaty being it the United Nations or whatever cannot
5 be with constitutional validity if it purports to assign foreign nationals to dictate how the
6 Commonwealth of Australia is governed. No use ousting some Labour Party member of the
7 NSW Parliament when other politicians are so to say selling out our constitutional rights.
8 Our constitution doesn’t and cannot provide powers to some foreign organisation or foreign
9 power such as some One World Order.
10
11 Regretfully, as I so often stated in my various writings we lack competent leadership.
12
13 Re AGENDA 21
14 It Is Destined To Happen This Way_ [ EXPOSED BY INSIDER ]
15 https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=HSTwaKrU4T8
16
17 This Year Is Critical_ [NEW VIDEO]-
18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovcCVbg6LU8
19
20 The Doctor Is In_ Scott Atlas and the Efficacy of Lockdowns, Social Distancing, and Closings
21 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZqGSnVt8c8
22
23 DEATHS PER 100,000
24 DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population
25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FACK2knC08E
26
27 The Truth About Mortality Rates _ COVID-19 Facts from the Frontline_2
28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEbcs37aaI0
29
30 Re COVID-19 and set up BLM
31 Are You Ready for The Great Reset
32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joUlWybJvHY
33
34 Wuhan reports cluster virus outbreak; Coverup in hospital; Over 200 protesters arrested in Hong Kong
35 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLvKAZRCKFQ
36
37 Slavery: Is there a Monopoly of Suffering?
38 https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16165/slavery-suffering
39
40 Lessons-from-the-Lockdown-vF-6-17-20
41 http://alternativeprinciplesforhealth.info/the-2020-virus/
42
43 https://www.cohealthchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Lessons-from-the-Lockdown-vF-6-17-20.pdf
44 20200628-Lessons-from-the-Lockdown-vF-6-17-20
45 QUOTE
46 This effect may not be confined to the U.S. The World Health Organization issued a press release on May
47 22 noting that, “Since March 2020, routine childhood immunization services have been disrupted on a
48 global scale that may be unprecedented since the inception of expanded programs on immunization
49 (EPI) in the 1970s.” (9) Are fewer children dying because their parents are skipping their routine
50 childhood vaccines? If lives are being saved during the pandemic, this is a question that urgently needs
51 answering.
52
53 Covid19 is unique among recent pandemics in that the mortality toll is measurable, real and convincing.
54 It is also nearly certain to be transitory, but that won’t stop the propaganda juggernaut from rolling
55 forward. However, as the saying goes, “the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry.” What no
56 one would have predicted in advance of Covid19 is that the extreme lockdown response has produced a
57 natural experiment that actually calls into question the very actions—widespread, mandated vaccines
30-6-2020 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

1 for all‐‐that the infectious disease and public health community have been pushing for years. We should
2 mourn the deaths of the elderly Manhattan nursing home residents but also take heed of the hundreds
3 of avoided infant deaths. Only with that kind of balance will we draw the proper lessons from the
4 pandemic and the lockdowns that have followed in its wake.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 The above part quoted of the article if properly considered underlines that because of a
8 significant drop in vaccination of under 1 year old children the death rate dropped by more than
9 200 children a week! Let us translate this to the elderly. If therefore vaccination can be deemed
10 associated with the death rate then it is reasonable to hold that if the vaccination is the culprit as
11 many doctors claim to weakening the immune system by about 36% then the death toll in
12 nursing homes and hospitals may very well be linked to the vaccinations. Meaning, the
13 vaccinations of the elderly is the underlying cause of death to any virus, being it corona virus of
14 even the flu. We have got politicians and health officials claiming that vaccinations save children
15 and there is no evidence to prove otherwise but that is their stupid mantra as the evidence is clear
16 that reducing vaccinations is saving lives. The experts themselves are able to explain this in more
17 precise details. Considering that it is claimed by doctors that at most 49% of vaccinations are
18 effective then clearly placing others at risk where the vaccination is not at all of any benefits but
19 undermine the immune system then the way we are going about to compulsory cause
20 vaccinations is not just abhorrent but I view with murderous intention. The elderly in my view
21 are a clear example considering the rates they are dying due to a lesser effective immune system.
22 In my view, “social distancing” is wrongly worded in any event because it implies that those
23 who work together do not have to keep distant of each other. However, as experts make clear
24 that “social distancing” is arbitrary without proper factual basis and indeed the mass rallies of
25 protest/riots/vandalism under line this that there was no significant outbreaks as result.
26 .
27 As I indicate in my recent writing’s also S119 of the constitution prohibits the usage of soldiers
28 in law enforcement. Within hours that I published this the minister for Defence then announced
29 that the ADF would not be used for law enforcement but for security at hotels. I then wrote upon
30 this that the ADF couldn’t be used for security as this would offend s119. Not long thereafter it
31 was announced that the ADF instead of 1,000 members would be a mere 150 or so. This
32 underlines that no proper consideration/consultation was given to the use of the ADF. One may
33 also wonder was this some knee jerk reaction as with most of other decisions with a disregard to
34 first properly consider the legality of any ADF involvement. Remarkable is that the ADF
35 actually could be involved regarding security matters without violating S119 if just we had
36 proper leadership to understand and comprehend this. I am not going to repeat this all in this
37 writing as it is extensive as it is already. My published writings can be downloaded from
38 http://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati without that I make any monies from it.
39 .
40 As I made clear in past writings Edmund Barton made clear that “man-kind” quarantine falls
41 under the Commonwealth. Hence, the Commonwealth could have say garnished hotels at say
42 Tullamarine Airport which I understand is under Commonwealth control and then use the ADF
43 for security, as such. In my view when it comes to QUARANTINE matters regarding “man-like”
44 issues then the States should have handed over those infected to the Commonwealth where they
45 are arriving by ship or airplane or even interstate. The Ruby Princess debacle clearly underlines
46 that the Federal Minister for Health was MISSING IN ACTION to take control of all passengers
47 and crew and had them transported to quarantine facilities to ensure they couldn’t spread the
48 infection to others. Such facilities could be held at Commonwealth territories as while the
49 states are to hold those held in detention or to be imprisoned for the Commonwealth the
50 quarantine issue is a different issue.
51 Now we have reportedly that some incoming travellers refuse to take a test to see if they are
52 cleared and so are allowed to go regardless of being able to infect others. Yet, the
30-6-2020 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1 Commonwealth should have been in charge having those people held in Commonwealth
2 quarantine compounds and refuse anyone to leave who refuses to have relevant test conducted to
3 see if they are clear of the virus. Then again as the test results are so to say up the creek as often
4 false results are shown then this further underlines to gross failure of the Federal Minister for
5 health to be on the job.
6
7 It is in my view the gross incompetence of whatever is claimed in States, Territories and
8 Commonwealth to be “leadership” that has cost the lives of many. In p[articular the blatant
9 ignorance to not vaccinate the elderly and so weakening their immune system and by this
10 become at risk of death. Is this how you deem proper leadership is to allow your aging parents (if
11 they are still alive that is) to die because of your gross incompetence?
12
13 My wife is going later this year 88 and was in ICU for heart failure and has numerous other
14 underlining health conditions which makes her a prime target for COVID-19 but she knows that
15 her changes to get through it all depends not upon any so called political leadership but rather
16 upon my ability to protect her to the best of my ability.
17 The fear mongering by politicians and health officials have done nothing to prevent deaths to
18 eventuate rather may likely have caused the death of many. As such there has in my view been a
19 major stuff up that we lack any proper kind of leadership and as result we have many of the
20 elderly dying by inappropriate care being provided.
21 .
22 Health officials are basically ignorant of the rule of law and so one cannot leave it to them to
23 make decisions. Indeed, there was conflict between health officials of different States and the
24 Commonwealth which underline this.
25
26 We also have the nonsense about wearing a mask but no consideration at all that such mask can
27 be more dangerous to the health of the person using it.
28
29 M95 mask see:
30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpDZEnKqoGE
31 (3) JAKO VAŽAN VIDEO - DIJELITE - YouTube
32
33 We have ended up with ad hoc and knee jerking decisions and LOCKDOWNS of healthy
34 persons while considerably blatantly ignoring the real protection of the elderly.
35
36 While you were previously a treasurer for the Commonwealth of Australia it is very obvious to
37 me you lacked the skill and the knowledge to be a competent treasurer. This also because if you
38 had been competent then you should have known that Taxation Bills (when passed and granted
39 Royal Ascent) are locked in only for the next financial year not thereafter. Likewise so with
40 Appropriation Bills. As the Framers of the constitution made clear not even in time of war could
41 those legislative provisions be altered during the financial year they apply to. Therefore unless
42 the Federal Parliament had Taxation Bills and Appropriation Bills passed and enacted for
43 the financial year for 2020-2021 the entire federal Government comes to a halt on 1 July
44 2020. Obviously, there is a way out to deal with this as I have set out in my past published
45 writings and so no need to go into all those details again.
46
47 As some of the video’s (referred to above) indicate also there is an AGENDA 21 which
48 somehow the Commonwealth signed up to just that there is no constitutional legitimacy to
49 enforce this AGENDA 21 in the Commonwealth of Australia. Likewise so, the absurd
50 treasonous claim of QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA, as regardless what anyone may claim our

30-6-2020 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1 constitution doesn’t permit, not even by referendum, to alter the monarchy to some fictitious
2 monarchy.
3 As I made clear none of the Attorney-Generals in the 19 July 20006 litigation opposed any of my
4 written submissions:
5 ADDRESS TO THE COURT
6 County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
7 QUOTE
8 The Defendants submits, that “Australian citizenship” can only be obtained by obtaining “State
9 citizenship”, as it is not a nationality, but has to deal with being a recognised “State citizens” where one
10 AUTOMATICALLY then obtain “Australian citizenship” (“Commonwealth citizenship” which includes
11 franchise. Because lawyers require to make an “Oath of alliance” when seeking to be admitted to the BAR
12 to practice, which now is to a LEGAL FICTIONAL “Queen of Australia” (as set out further in this
13 ADDRESS TO THE COURT), while being a Subjects of the British Crown, (as also set out further), then
14 there is a clear conflict for any judge to deal with this matter which would in effect involve his/her own
15 personal legal position if qualified to be a judge of this Court. Albeit judicial officers may not be aware that
16 their true constitutionally nationality is and remain to be British nationals and so any “ Oath of alliance” to a
17 LEGAL FICTIONAL “Queen of Australia” would be a conflict. Where the High Court of Australia in Sue
18 v Hill ousted Heather Hill of being a member of parliament upon the basis that she was having alliance to a
19 foreign Queen, then as set out further in this ADDRESS TO THE COURT, the same applies to all other
20 persons, including judicial officers, who by birth (including all those persons born within the Commonwealth
21 of Australia) or by naturalization are in fact “subjects of the British Crown.”
22 END QUOTE
23
24 It should be noted that the Commonwealth in response to my 409 pages written submissions as
25 well as my notice of constitutional matters responded that it was “not in the public interest” to
26 oppose my appeals. The court noted that the Commonwealth had not filed any evidence. This
27 despite that on 5 August 2005 the Magistrates Court of Victoria at Heidelberg upheld my
28 objection against “averment” not being applicable, and ordered the Commonwealth to file and
29 serve all relevant material it sought to rely upon.
30 While counsel for the Commonwealth claimed in protest that this would involve truck loads of
31 documents, this the court made clear was between the prosecutor and the defendant, reality is
32 that counsel in my view was deliberately misleading the court , albeit unsuccessfully, this as the
33 ballot papers of the House of Representatives of 2001 federal election as well of the 2004 federal
34 election no longer existed as they were to my understanding already destroyed. Moreover so I
35 understand the Senate ballot papers of the 2001 federal election.
36
37 I achieved that not even Deryn Hinch (former Senator since then) was able to achieve with his
38 legal team subsequently, as it is not how much you know but how competent you are with the
39 little you may know to present your case successfully.
40
41 Even so the court overruled the “averment” claimed provision (by the Commonwealth)
42 somehow the ATO nevertheless continue to use this and so I view pervert the course of justice
43 time and time again against Defendants.
44
45 I do not go around on demonstrations causing havoc amongst other road users, as I rather rely
46 upon my achievements in litigation and my other writings. I so to say do my homework and
47 benefits from the fruits of it. After all I can never again be pursued for “FAILING TO VOTE”
48 this is because I comprehensively defeated all Attorney-Generals in the litigation. Yet, by sheer
49 ignorance and/or incompetence State, territory and Commonwealth continue to fine electors for
50 “FAILING TO VOTE” in total disregard to the court’s ruling of 19 July 2006 to uphold my
51 appeals against “compulsory” voting.
52
53 This gross incompetence (regardless of political parties) is maintained throughout and the
54 COVID-19 issue is a clear example.
30-6-2020 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 11

1 .
2 While initial reports from China as I understand it was grossly deceptive as I understand way
3 back in September 2019 it already conducted at an airport a cleaning process regarding what is
4 now known as COVID-19 nevertheless when taxpayers are funding at millions of dollars health
5 departments as well as politicians then at the very least they are not just entitled to expect but
6 entitled totally to have them acting competently and not incompetently. This Also as pandemics
7 have been coming around at times in the past. As such, a competent Minister for health would
8 have planned ahead. Now however we find Minister of Health “MISSING IN ACTION” and
9 despite sheer incompetence, at least as I view it to be, nevertheless is still the responsible
10 Minister. Which means you lack leadership to ensure that a more competent person was in the
11 job.
12
13 Obviously, you can continue to be arrogant and ignore my writings and well if down the time
14 your (future) descendants suffer the consequences well that is the legacy you left them with.
15 In my view a competent leader would have ensured that the most vulnerable would be secured
16 without violating their need of family/community contact and that those suspected of being
17 infected, such as return travelers are all placed in quarantine until proven not to be infected. Not
18 only relating to return travelers but also to those on board of ships that arrive and where any
19 crew or passengers are to disembark. As such to include any leisure boating where the
20 crew/passengers are travelling inter state and/or to other countries.
21
22 That should have been in my view the core issue and followed with appropriate protection
23 regarding health workers.
24 .
25 We now have this absurd conduct in Victoria that allegedly some 1,000 people are going from
26 door to door to talk to people in so called “hot spots” about any ill health. Forget those
27 doorknockers themselves perhaps spreading the COVID-19 and infecting others. This is the
28 gross incompetence we have going on and on.
29
30 http://www.opensourcetruth.com/can-you-handle-covid-truth/
31 "What no one would have predicted in advance of Covid19 is that the extreme lockdown response has
32 produced a natural experiment that actually calls into question the very actions—widespread, mandated
33 vaccines for all‐‐that the infectious disease and public health community have been pushing for years. We
34 should mourn the deaths of the elderly Manhattan nursing home residents but also take heed of the hundreds of
35 avoided infant deaths. Only with that kind of balance will we draw the proper lessons from the pandemic and
36 the lockdowns that have followed in its wake." -- White Paper
37
38
39 Locking up healthy people is crazy AND IN EFFECT ESCALATE THE RISK OF
40 SPREADING THE VIRUS!
41
42 While the media is making much about the people voting about leadership reality is if you ask
43 them to vote for choosing the best of 2 rotten apples then likely you might get the same result.
44
45 The closing of borders I view is a violation of section 117 of the constitution but do you
46 really care?
47
48 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/how-dutch-rigged-outcome-mh17-trial-charge-requires-no-proof
49 How The Dutch Rigged The Outcome Of The MH17 Trial (On A Charge That Requires No Proof)
50 Posted 27-6-2020 12:58
51 QUOTE

30-6-2020 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 12

1 For what it is worth, I residing in Australia but born in The Netherlands did communicate with the
2 investigating body which acknowledged my extensive submissions. It had no legal position to determine who
3 was a guilty party neither did intent to do so. As such, the report is deliberately misused as if there was a fact
4 finding as to who committed the downing of MH17 even so the report was not intended neither designed for
5 this to bring out. In fact, the Dutch legislation doesn’t permit it to do so. I also pointed out that relevant
6 details relied upon were in my view misconstrued. The real usage of any weapons was not according to
7 recorded records. It should be understood the investigation was not at all to determine who might have been a
8 guilty party as that was beyond its legislative power but as to what the cause was and how this can be
9 addressed to avoid future likewise incidents. As such it was no more but a “safety” investigation and not at
10 all a criminal investigation!
11 END QUOTE
12
13 Yes, even regarding MH17 we have got a gross failure to address the real issues as we seem to
14 have politicians driven mad to blame the Russians rather than to understand that the investigation
15 was conducted within legal provisions not to direct any claims as to whom might be the
16 perpetrator but rather as to safety aspects. This is in particular importance as to obtain
17 cooperation from all involved or claimed to be involved. As such blaming the Russians without
18 bothering to consider all relevant material I I referred to in my submissions to the board where it
19 claimed it was not in fact finding mission who was responsible, then one must be so to say a
20 complete idiot to rely upon the Safety Board investigation as to seek to blame whomever, where
21 this investigation clearly was not for that purpose of a criminal investigation. It underlines we
22 lack competent leadership even when it comes to such simple matter as to understand the
23 difference between a “safety investigation” and a “criminal investigation”.
24
25 Again, you can ignore my writings, other than the recant aborting of using ADF for law
26 enforcement in Victoria, but consider what you might be doing also to any of your current and
27 future descendants in the process as well as your failure to provide appropriate leadership for all
28 Australians.
29
30 As always, I am available to communicate issues but if you continue to be too arrogant for this
31 then this may underline your appalling ignorance to the rights and health of Australians.
32
33 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
34
35 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
36 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

37 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

38 (Our name is our motto!)

30-6-2020 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati