Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1.0 Introduction
From the day people apply for their first positions, even for a place at University, they may be
involved in interviews. Nowadays on the job interviews also include exit interviews where
leavers are requested to give valuable work related feedback to employers. Although the
interviewer normally leads the conversation, the interviewee may also take the opportunity to
accomplish a personal purpose, for example, obtain or provide useful information, create
goodwill or persuade the interviewer to take action. In effect, if well conducted, the interview
can enable both parties to reach their objectives.
Thill & Bovée (2017) define interviews as planned conversations with a predetermined purpose
that involve asking and answering questions. The interviewer asks a series of often
predetermined questions in order to elicit feedback (or verify C.V information) from the
interviewee. One or several interviewers (panel) may be involved.
Depending on the purpose of the interview, it is normally the interviewer who establishes the
structure and style of interview. For example in selection interviews, the employer wants to learn
about the applicant’s abilities, experience and predisposition. The candidate, on the other hand,
wants to learn about issues concerning the job and details on the organisation’s HR policies and
practices.
Conversely, in an exit interview, the employer wants to know why the employee is leaving. One
can find clues about whether the business is handled properly and if any improvements can be
made to retain key employees.
Qu: List down a few reasons for conducting interviews.
Group
6-8 candidates
Group observed while discussing topic
Be aware of group interaction
Panel
2-5 interviewers, or as many as 13!!
Try to identify different roles
Respond to interviewer, include others through eye contact
When welcoming the applicant, use his/her full name. “Hello John Smith. I’m Nagarajan
Kripalani.” This gives the applicant the feeling that you identify him/her as an individual, not
just as another candidate. Dale Carnegie is reported to have said, “Remember, a person’s name
is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.”
By similarly using both the first and the last name in addressing the applicant and in introducing
yourself, you are putting both of you at the same level. If you call yourself Mr or Mrs and call
the applicant “John” it sounds condescending.
The opening question should be related to the interview, but should not put the applicant on the
defensive or upset him/her. Don’t start with such questions as “What makes you think that you
could handle this job professionally?” or “Why were you dismissed from your last job?”
A more sensible approach would be to select an innocuous area from the application and
comment on it. It may be based on something in the background that you relate to. For
example, “I note you went to Royal College of Port Louis. Did you know Mr Naraidoo, the
drama teacher?” or “I see you live in Highlands. The area is growing rapidly.”
STAR response
S: Describe the situation
T: Explain the task/problem that arose
A: What action did you take?
R: What was the result or outcome?
What did you learn from this experience?
In this way, the applicant may talk about problems, personality factors, attitudes, or problems
that might not have been uncovered directly. On the other hand, it may bring out some positive
factors or strengths that might have been missed by direct questioning.
Another way of using nondirective approach is to choose to be silent. Most people can’t tolerate
long silence. The applicant is likely to keep talking if you voluntarily keep silent.
Total Marks
Some interviewers start the interview by giving the job description. This includes the duties and
responsibilities related to the job.
The best way to give information about duties and responsibilities is to provide it to the applicant
throughout the interview. For a sales job that involves calling on supermarket chains, you might
first ask the candidate to state the types of shops he/she called on.
You should then ask specific questions about the applicant’s working experience in each of these
types of shops. If the sales background is satisfactory, you might then say, “I’m glad you have
such a fine background in dealing with store chains as they represent about 60 percent of our
customer list. If you’re hired, you’d be working closely with those chains.”
Otherwise, if the background in this area was lacking, you might say, “As much of our business
is with store chains, if you are hired, we would have to provide you with training in this area”.
Before the end of the process, the interviewer has a fairly complete knowledge of the applicant’s
background and the interviewee should have a fair idea of the nature of the job.
Taking notes also may have a negative effect on you, the interviewer. You’re so busy writing
what the applicant just said, that you miss what is being said currently.
The interviewee normally writes brief notes during the interview. Immediately after the
interview, the notes are reviewed and a summary is written, while the interview is still fresh in
your mind.
List the reasons for accepting or rejecting each candidate. Stating a reason helps overcome
intuitive decisions based on some vague like or dislike.
Some companies have special forms/grids designed for interview record keeping. Otherwise you
may make notes on the application form or on a paper and attach to the form after the interview.
In any case, a summary form should be completed immediately after the close of the interview.
With accurate records of the interviews, it is easier to compare candidates with the set criteria,
for example, demonstration of knowledge, application of knowledge in context, experience etc.
By rereading your notes, you are more likely to make sounder judgements rather than depending
on memory. With several people interviewing the same candidate, a consistent system of
Good records are also useful when you face legal problems. In case of a Court investigation,
good records of the interview can be your most important defence. Where inadequate records
have been kept, the Court will have to rely on the company’s word against the applicant’s.
Good, accurate records provide evidence.
Documents to be prepared:
- Job description
- Person specifications
- Assessment grid
- Proposed list of questions for each panel member.