OBE Syllabus Methods1

Republic of the Philippines
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE

F. Pimentel Avenue, Brgy. 2, Daet, Camarines Norte – 4600, Philippines
COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY
Revision 0(As of June 13, 2018)
OBE SYLLABUS IN METHODS OF RESEARCH
A. VISION: CNSC as a premier higher education institution in the Bicol Region.
B. MISSION: The Camarines Norte State College shall provide higher and advanced studies in the fields of education, arts and sciences,
economics, health, engineering, management, finance, accounting, business and public administration, agriculture, natural
resources development and management and ladderized courses. It shall also respond to research, extension and production
services adherent to progressive leadership towards sustainable development.
C. QUALITY POLICY:
We, at Camarines Norte State College, aiming to become a Premier Higher Education Institution in the Bicol Region, are
committed to providing excellent services in instruction, research, extension and production that are responsive to the satisfaction
of our students and other stakeholders.
To achieve the College vision and mission, we shall implement an internationally recognized management system in our
operations, processes and services. Through this, we shall:
 comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, the mandates of the College and relevant needs and
expectations of our students and other stakeholders, and the requisites of our quality management system;
 delight our students and other stakeholders by providing value-adding experiences to become well-rounded and more
competitive future leaders in the midst of global issues;
 provide our employees support to grow and achieve their full potential in their respective fields, thereby sustaining a
competent, motivated and engaging workforce;
 develop and extend innovative technologies to our stakeholders contributing to the country’s sustainable development; and
CNSC-OP-VPA-01F1 Page 1 of 15
Revision: 1
 establish objectives aimed at improving the efficiency of our operations, processes and services for our College growth and
development;
We shall make this policy an essential part of our instruction, research and extension services to ensure that it continuously
provides us strategic directions in improving our overall performance and quality management system.
D. DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology major in Computer and Electronics Technology
E. COURSE CODE: RES 321
F. COURSE TITLE: METHODS OF RESEARCH
G. COURSE DESCRIPTION: The course aims to introduce the basic ideas, concepts and principles of research methodology, the problem,
methods of research , preparation of research instruments design to arrive at better analysis and interpretation
of data.
H. CREDIT UNITS: 3 units
I. PREREQUISITE: None
J. NO. OF HOURS: 3 hrs./week
K. SCHEDULE: MWF 1:00 – 2:00
L. CONSULTATION HOURS: 8 - 12 MONDAY
Revision: 1
M. INSTITUTIONAL INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES:

CNSC envisions a graduate having the following attributes: professional competence, critical and creative thinking skills,
technical competitive skills, productivity, social and ethical responsibility, communication skills, interpersonal skills and lifelong
learning.
N. PROGRAM INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES: Upon the completion of the program, the graduates can:
1. Equip the students with the professional and technological competence within a field of specialization so that they become
productive members of this community and the nation as a whole.(a.1)
2. Assess the students in terms of their skill competencies through National Certificates (NC) issued by the Technical
Education Skills and Development Authority (TESDA). (a.2)
3. Provide better career opportunities in their field of specialization. (a.3)
4. Exemplify professional, social and ethical responsibility on their chosen field. (a.4)
O. COURSE INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of the course, students should be able to:
1. Show understanding on underlying concepts, principles and basic methods of research.
2. Demonstrate skills in utilizing research process.
3. Apply research process in constructing Chapter 1 of the research proposal.
6. Develop prototype of research project.
7. Defend research proposal to the panel in examiners.
Revision: 1
P. LEARNING PLAN:
TEACHING
& ASSESSME
INTENDED LEARNING TEXTBOOKS/ RESOURCE TIME
CONTENTS LEARNING NT TASKS
OUTCOMES (ILO) REFERENCES MATERIALS ALLOCATION
ACTIVITIES (ATs)
(TLAs)
At the end of the learning
period, the students should be
able to: Introduction of Research Laptop,
1. Show understanding  Basic concepts in Calmorin, L. and Lecture - powerpoint
on underlying Research Calmorin, M., discussion presentation, Week 1 - 4
concepts, principles  Classification of Research whiteboard &
Research Methods and whiteboard
and basic methods of
 Ethical guidelines and Thesis Writing 2nd marker
research. considerations in Edition, Rex
Research Bookstore,Inc.,
2007
2. Demonstrate skills in Conceptualizing Research Calmorin, Lecture – Laptop, Week 5

utilizing research Study (with emphasis in Laurentina, discussion powerpoint
process. developmental research Research and presentation,
approach) Statistics with whiteboard &
 Phases of research Computer, whiteboard
 Research National Students Rubrics for marker
Topic/Problem Bookstore Inc., presents 3 Assessing
2010 probable Group
research Presentation Laptop,
problem ( see projector,
Revision: 1
TEACHING
& ASSESSME
ACTIVITIES (ATs)
(TLAs)
(group appendix A) powerpoint
presentation) presentation
Rubrics for
Title Defense with Title Defense Assessing Week 6
 Rationale/Backgrou (group Group
nd of the Study presentation) Presentation
 Objectives ( see
appendix A)
END OF PRELIM
3. Apply research process Writing Chapter 1- Introduction Calmorin, L. and Output 1 – Rubrics for Laptop Week 6 – 9
in constructing Chapter  Background of the Calmorin, M., Chapter 1 written
1 of the research Study Research Output 1 printed
 Objectives of the Study Methods and ( see output with
proposal.
 Significance of the Thesis Writing 2nd appendix B) adviser
Study Edition, Rex remarks
 Scope and Limitation of Bookstore,Inc.,
the Study 2007
4. Apply research process Writing Chapter 2 – Conceptual

in constructing Chapter Framework Calmorin,
 Review of Laurentina, Output 2 – Laptop Week 9-12
Revision: 1
TEACHING
& ASSESSME
ACTIVITIES (ATs)
(TLAs)
2 of the research Related Research and Chapter 2 Rubrics for
proposal. Literature and Statistics with written printed
Parallel Studies Computer, output 2 output with
 Conceptual National ( see adviser
Model of the Bookstore Inc., appendix C) remarks
Study/Project 2010
 Definition of
Terms
END OF MIDTERM
5. Apply research process Writing Chapter 3 – Calmorin, L. and Output 3 – Rubrics for Laptop, `
in constructing Chapter Methodology Calmorin, M., Chapter 3 written printed
3 of the research  Project Design Research output 3 output with
 Project Development Methods and ( see adviser
proposal.
 Operation and Testing Thesis Writing 2nd appendix C) remarks
Procedures Edition, Rex
 Evaluation Procedures Bookstore,Inc., Week 13-17
2007
Revision: 1
TEACHING
& ASSESSME
ACTIVITIES (ATs)
(TLAs)
6. Develop prototype of Prototype/ utility model
research project. Calmorin,
Laurentina,
Week 18
Research and Laptop,
8. Defend research Chapter 1- 3 with Prototype Statistics with Final Defense powerpoint
proposal to the panel in Computer, presentation,
examiners. National Rubrics for printed and
Bookstore Inc., Oral Defense completed
2010 ( see written
appendix D) output
(Chapter 1-3)
Prototype of
the project.
END OF FINALS
Q. COURSE POLICIES:
A. Provision for Inclusive Education shall be implemented at the start of semester. The institution’s commitment to inclusive education:
Recognizing that with the right support, CNSC has high hopes that all students can succeed. Our commitment means that students from different
social, cultural, religious and family backgrounds including members of Indigenous People, Students with disability and gender identities can:
 Attend education and be welcomed;
 Access and participate in a high-quality education and fully engage in the curriculum;
 Learn in safe and supportive environment, free from bullying , discrimination or harassment;
 Achieve academically and socially with reasonable accommodation and supports tailored to meet their learning needs; and
Revision: 1
 Promote a culture and shared values that remove barriers and support inclusion.
1. Students shall be graded either PASSED or FAILED.
2. Cumulative grading system in all undergraduate and graduate course/program offering will be adopted.
3. There shall be three (3) rating periods per semester: preliminary, mid-term and final.
4. Grades shall be computed for every rating period.
5. There shall be two (2) types of grades to be computed per rating period. Tentative grade (TG) and Final Grade (FG).
6. Three major criteria in determining the performance of students per rating period: Class Standing, Periodical Examinations and Project.
7. The Tentative Grade (TG) shall be computed as follows:
CRITERIA (TENTATIVE GRADE) PERCENTAGE

Class Standing 30%
 Attendance 5%
 Written Output 25%
Periodical Examination 30%
Final Defense 40%
TOTAL 100%
FG PREVIOUS RATING PERIOD +2 ( TC CURRENT RATING PERIOD )

FG CURRENT =
3
8. On Attendance: The rating for attendance shall be based on the number of absences incurred. A perfect attendance shall be equivalent to 100. For
every absent incurred a demerit of 8 points shall be deducted from 100 and thereafter. And for every late or tardiness incurred a demerit of 4 will be
deducted. The total rating shall be the result of the combined application of demerits to absences and tardiness.
9. Passing the Subject: In order for the students to pass, he/she must obtain a grade of 3.0 or 75%. The failing grade is 5.0. Grade from 74 and
below shall not earn any credit.
Revision: 1
 The following grading system shall be used:

1.00 – 99%-100% 1.50 – 93% 2.00 – 87% 2.50 – 81% 3.00 – 75%
1.10 – 98% 1.60 – 92% 2.10 – 86% 2.60 – 80%
1.20 – 97% 1.70 – 91% 2.20 – 85% 2.70 – 79% 5.00 – Failed
1.25 – 96% 1.75 – 90% 2.25 – 84% 2.75 – 78%
INC – Incomplete
1.30 – 95% 1.80 – 89% 2.30 – 83% 2.80 – 77%
1.40 – 94% 1.90 – 88% 2.40 – 82% 2.90 – 76%
 Pass the Major Exams (Prelim, Midterm and Final Exam).
 Submit Term Requirements/Project. Submission of term requirement/project a day after the specified date shall mean an equivalent rating of
75% and a point deduction for every succeeding days.
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed. ROSALIE A. ALMADRONES, Ph.D.

Instructor I College Dean Vice President for Academic Affairs
Revision: 1
APPENDIX A:
Rubrics for Assessing Group Presentation (___/20)
CRITERIA 5 4 3 2
Teamwork The group work very well with The group work well with Group communicated relatively Group did not work well
each other and the presentation each other and well with a few lapses in the together. There were
was shared equally among the communicated well. Some presentation; some students obvious
group members. members participated slightly dominated the presentation miscommunications and
more than others. and others did not participated lapses in the presentation.
much.
Content Presentation had an exceptional Presentation had a good Presentations had moments Presentation contained
amount of valuable material and amount of material and where valuable material was little to no valuable
was extremely beneficial to the benefited the class. present but as a whole, material.
class. content was lacking.
Organization The presentation was well The presentation had There were minimal signs of The presentation lacked
organized, well prepared and easy organizing ideas but could organization or preparation. organization and had little
to follow. have been much stronger evidence of preparation.
with better presentation.
Presentation Presenters were all very confident Presenters were occasionally Presenters were not consistent Presenters were
in delivery and they did an confident with their with the level of confidence/ unconfident and
excellent job of engaging the presentation however the preparedness they showed the demonstrated little
class. Preparation is very evident. presentation was not as classroom but had some evidence of planning prior
engaging as it could have strong moments. to presentation.
been for the class
Prepared by: Approved by:
HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed.

Instructor I College Dean
APPENDIX B:
Revision: 1
RUBRICS FOR WRITTEN OUTPUT 1 (__/20)
CRITERIA/CONTENT 5 4 3 2
Introduction Well formulated Fairly well formulated Introduction is not well Lacks a proper
introduction based on the introduction that has some constructed and provide introduction. There is no
facts that are supported evidence to support the few ( less than 5) sources substantive evidence to
with 5 or more strong topic but the evidence is a of weak evidence to support the topic.
sources of evidence mixture of strong and weak support the topic.
specific to topic. sources.
Purpose of Study Very clearly stated purpose Fairly well stated purpose Purpose of the study is not Lacks a purpose of the
of the study that connects of the study that connects clearly stated and/or does study statement or does
very well to the well to the introduction. not connect well with the not pertain to the
introduction. introduction. introduction.
Objectives 3 or more comprehensive Stated 3 objectives but Stated less than 3 Stated less than 3 objective
objectives stated with limited evidence of objectives and not clearly with no evidence of
considering the achievable achievable and measurable objective. measurable and achievable
and measurable objective. objective. objective.
Format Adhere with all format Meet the format Lacking of format Not meet the format
requirements. requirement. requirement requirement.

APPENDIX C:
Revision: 1
Articles Information is gathered Information is gathered Information is gathered Information is gathered
from multiple, research- from multiple sources. from limited number of from a single source.
X2 based sources. sources.
Organization Well organized, Well organized, but Weakly organized, with no No organization,
demonstrates logical demonstrates illogical logical sequencing and sequencing or structure.
X2 sequencing and structure. sequencing and structure. structure.
Reference Sheet Information is cited Information is cited Information is cited but has Information is not cited or
properly and in APA properly. errors. is cited incorrectly.
format.
Format Adhere with all format Meet the format Lacking of format Not meet the format
requirements. requirement. requirement requirement.

APPENDIX D:
Revision: 1
Choice of Methodology Clear explanation of the A good explanation of the Some explanation provided Little if any explanation
choice of methodology and choice of methodology and for the choice of provided for the choice of
its links to the inquiry its links to the methodology and its links methodology and few links
/objectives. inquiry/objectives. to the inquiry/objectives. made to the
inquiry/objectives.
Sampling Full description and A good description and Some description and Little if any description and
explanation of participants explanation of participants explanation of participants explanation of participants
is provided with the is provided with the is provided with some is provided and missing
appropriate detail. appropriate detail. detail. details.
Project Development Full description and A good description and Some description and Little if any description and
detailed steps/procedures detailed steps/procedures some detailed evident missing
in developing/constructing in developing/constructing steps/procedures in steps/procedures in
the project. the project. developing/constructing the developing/constructing the
project. project.
Anticipated Challenges / Potential There is a good outline of There is some attempt at Little if any potential
Limitation challenges/limitations are potential outlining potential challenges /limitations are
clearly discussed in relation challenges/limitations in challenges/limitations to discussed in relation to
to future findings. relation to future findings. future findings. future findings.

Appendix E:
Revision: 1
Rubrics for Oral Defense
Revision: 1

Revision: 1

OBE Syllabus Methods1

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

OBE Syllabus Methods1

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Republic of the Philippines

CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

Revision 0(As of June 13, 2018)

OBE SYLLABUS IN METHODS OF RESEARCH

A. VISION: CNSC as a premier higher education institution in the Bicol Region.

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

E. COURSE CODE: RES 321

F. COURSE TITLE: METHODS OF RESEARCH

H. CREDIT UNITS: 3 units

J. NO. OF HOURS: 3 hrs./week

K. SCHEDULE: MWF 1:00 – 2:00

L. CONSULTATION HOURS: 8 - 12 MONDAY

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

M. INSTITUTIONAL INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES:

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

2. Demonstrate skills in Conceptualizing Research Calmorin, Lecture – Laptop, Week 5

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

4. Apply research process Writing Chapter 2 – Conceptual

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

CRITERIA (TENTATIVE GRADE) PERCENTAGE

FG PREVIOUS RATING PERIOD +2 ( TC CURRENT RATING PERIOD )

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

 The following grading system shall be used:

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed. ROSALIE A. ALMADRONES, Ph.D.

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed.

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

RUBRICS FOR WRITTEN OUTPUT 1 (__/20)

Prepared by: Approved by:

HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed.

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

Prepared by: Approved by:

HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed.

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

Prepared by: Approved by:

HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed.

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

Rubrics for Oral Defense

COLLEGE OF TRADES AND TECHNOLOGY

Prepared by: Approved by:

HONEYCELL D. BALDONASA GIL VICTOR G. ZALDUA, MA.Ed.

Potrebbero piacerti anche