2
CAPITOLO 1
Re(3) Garda è un progetto di cooperazione ambientale dei 9 comuni del Parco Alto Garda
Bresciano:
Salò
Gardone Riviera
Toscolano Maderno
Gargnano
Magasa
Valvestino
Tignale
Tremosine
Limone
Il progetto consiste nella creazione di un gruppo di lavoro tra tutti gli Assessori all’Ambiente e/o
Ecologia oltreché per conoscenza ai Sindaci dei suddetti comuni.
L’obiettivo del gruppo di lavoro è quello di riuscire a rendere partecipi i singoli comuni di un
progetto partecipativo sui temi ambientali.
Attualmente il gruppo di lavoro si incontra con una frequenza mensile nella sala consiliare della
comunità montana Parco Alto Garda a Gargnano.
2
Il concetto legato alle 3RE ossia Reduce, Reuse, Recycle è nell’ottica della European Waste
hierarchy come un punto cardine della strategia che le amministrazioni locali devono compiere
per realizzare una riduzione netta del rifuto secco indifferenziato da mandare nelle fase di
Recovery (ossia l’incenerimento per ricavare energia) e la fase Disposal (ossia la discarica
controllata).
La novità del progetto RE(3)Garda sta nel fatto che non è un gestore a proporre le iniziative
ambientali per il miglioramento del ciclo integrato, ma le singole amministrazioni comunali, che,
in maniera coordinata, cercano di attuare soluzioni innovative per la risoluzione del problema
nell’ottica della direttiva comunitaria.
L’obiettivo dichiarato di una riduzione netta del rifiuto secco di minimo il 30% sarebbe un
risultato storico per una zona altamente turistica come il Garda Bresciano.
L’utilizzo inoltre di un’area così differente come periodicità (ossia il picco turistico estivo con
circa 2 milioni di presenze turistiche stagionali su 30.000 abitanti) potrebbe essere un bacino di
studio sperimentale esportabile in altri comuni e città italiane.
The 3Rs are categories at the top of our disposal options. They
include a variety of initiatives for disposing of discards. Generally,
options lowest on the list are least desirable.
3
GLI OBIETTIVI DEL PROGETTO RE(3)GARDA
I Progetti operativi che il gruppo di lavoro ha proposto nell’annualità 2010 sono i seguenti.
Compostaggio Locale
Tutti i quattro progetti sono stati condivisi a livello comunitario e sarebbero, soprattutto i primi
due, delle sperimentazioni uniche a livello nazionale.
4
COMPOSTAGGIO COLLETTIVO
E’ dotato di una funzione miscelatrice, che garantisce la produzione di compost ben bilanciato;
Può essere equipaggiato con un dosatore automatico, che permette di inserire ogni volta la giusta quantità di
pellet;
Permette agli utenti di utilizzare sacchetti di carta per raccogliere i propri rifiuti umidi domestici.
E' dotato di un impianto di sicurezza che lo rende utilizzabile da chiunque senza correre alcun rischio
Il macchinario è di facile manutenzione ed è stato studiato per essere accessibile a tutti, anche a persone in
carrozzella.
La struttura della JK5100 è realizzata in acciaio inossidabile. Tutte le parti mobili, invece, sono
sostituibili, per garantire un’operatività prolungata nel tempo. Le operazioni di triturazione,
mescolamento e aerazione sono regolabili da un apposito pannello di controllo, al fine di
permettere alla macchina di adattarsi con facilità a differenti flussi di rifiuti organici e garantire
un compostaggio ottimale.
5
E’ CONVENIENTE ADOTTARE LE COMPOSTIERE JORAFORM? IN QUANTO
TEMPO SI RIPAGA L’INVESTIMENTO?
L’utilizzo dei macchinari Joraform per il compostaggio locale collettivo consente di ridurre il
costo di raccolta, trasporto, trattamento e smaltimento dei rifiuti organici dal 30 al 70 per cento,
oltre ad abbattere l’inquinamento e le emissioni da traffico.
Comuni tra i cinquecento e i mille abitanti che hanno promosso il compostaggio domestico
individuale, raggiungendo percentuali di adesione a tale pratica del 50–70%, possono in questo
modo eliminare il circuito di raccolta della frazione umida con l’installazione di una sola
macchina compostatrice.
In proporzione, lo stesso risultato può essere ottenuto da Comuni tra i duemila e i cinquemila
abitanti, ma anche Comuni più grandi possono installare, o far installare, la macchina presso
condomini, mense aziendali, scuole, case di riposo, ristoranti e hotel, ovvero i ―grandi
produttori‖ di rifiuti umidi organici.
Considerando un’obsolescenza tecnica di 15 anni, una compostiera JK5100 si ripaga in un lasso
di tempo compreso tra i due e i quattro anni. Tali benefici economici aumentano ulteriormente
in situazioni geografiche particolari (come territori montani distanti dai centri abitati o isole),
dove una singola macchina consente risparmi fino a 4.000 euro/anno.
I prodotti Joraform beneficiano di una garanzia da parte della casa madre svedese di due anni
su tutti i componenti; la manodopera non è inclusa.
La proposta è quella di inserire un sistema sperimentale che inserisca nelle isole ecologiche:
1 Joraform JK5100 per i comuni sotto i 2500 abitanti
L’ultimo passaggio del progetto sarebbe legato ad incentivi economici per l’acquisto da parte di
grandi utenze alberghiere di Joraform JK5100.
Esempio: Grand Hotel Gardone
L’hotel paga una TARSU oltre i 50.000€/anno e ovviamente la gran parte di rifiuto prodotto sarà
FORSU (ossia Frazione Umida). Proponendo all’utenza alberghiera l’acquisto della compostiera
comunitaria si avrebbe innanzitutto l’eliminazione del ritiro dell’umido presso l’utenza, oltreché
l’abbassamento della RSU complessiva.
Come controparte il comune potrebbe proporre un incentivo economico all’acquisto con una
riduzione in tarsu pari al massimo della FORSU gestibile dalla JK5100. Ossia: 20ton/anno =
3000€.
Avviando un progetto sperimentale simile potremmo quindi verificare la fattibilità di un
ampliamento al modello nordico, ossia una compostiera per ogni frazione (quindi permettendo il
conferimento di ―prossimità‖ da parte dell’utenza finale).
FASE2
Utilizzando il profilo medio di 3246 abitanti e una R.I. pari a 2318,755 ton/anno possiamo
affermare che:
Applicando un modello con 10 macchine posizionate nel territorio avremmo una riduzione potenziale di 200 ton/anno;
Il ROI avrebbe una tempistica media (come già affrontato nei calcoli precedenti) a 4-5 anni.
Dopo il 4°-5° anno tutto il mancato conferimento della FORSU nella RSU genererebbe un guadagno netto di circa 30.000€
annui.
Sulla base del ciclo di vita della macchina (20 anni), possiamo quindi affermare che il guadagno netto potenziale di un
progetto simile è pari a 450.000€.
7
PROPOSTA DEL GRUPPO
8
BIGBELLY SOLAR:
SPERIMENTAZIONE CESTINI
9
L'idea sviluppata con BigBelly Solar è quello di ridurre la frequenza di prelievo dei rifiuti
depositati nei contenitori pubblici di raccolta.
Ma l'unico modo di farlo è quello di aumentare lo spazio disponibile. Ma non aumentando il
volume del raccoglitore, bensì riducendo quello della spazzatura.
Realizzato come un normale contenitore di tipo chiuso che si trova nelle strade americane (che
ha anche il vantaggio di non far entrare gli animali o di consentire alle persone di infilarci la
mano), BigBelly Solar funziona come un compattatore riducendo il volume complessivo dei
rifiuti. La sua capacità di ridurre il volume è pari a 5 volte.
E' come se il contenitore fosse 5 volte più grande.
Il motore interno è alimentato dal pannello solare situato al di sopra e protetto da un vetro
lenticolare che gli consente di catturare il più a lungo possibile l'energia del sole, producendo
fino a 50 watt di energia più che sufficienti per alimentare il motore interno.
Il primo modello presentato consente la raccolta non differenziata dei rifiuti, ma ora sono anche
usciti i modelli per la raccolta del vetro (fratuma e sbriciola) e della carta (sminuzza e
compatta).
Risultato? La spazzatura è stata ridotta di volume, le volte necessarie per il ritiro diminuiscono,
si risparmiano soldi e si inquina di meno.
Il costo? si parla di 4-5000€ per contenitore.
I materiali utilizzati per realizzare O pappòne americano sono: plastica riciclata e vernici
atossiche ed ecologiche.
Forse non è la soluzione definitiva, ma sono le piccole cose che trasformano gli obiettivi
ambiziosi in realtà.
10
CASE STUDY
The City of Boston ―The solar trash receptacles have to go citywide. It will give us a more
productive work force because you don’t have to pick them up everyday.‖ – Mayor Thomas
Menino
The Town of Banff, AB, Canada ―It is not only an operational savings, but it’s also an
environmental savings from less fuel.‖ – Chad Townsend, Banff environmental services
coordinator
The City of Philadelphia ―This technology will save taxpayers money, introduce sidewalk
recycling and keep our streets clean. This is one more important step towards achieving our
sustainability goals.‖ – Mayor Michael Nutter, City of Philadelphia
Georgetown University ―The results have been nothing short of incredible, with waste collection
being reduced from seven times per week to two.‖ – Bill del Vecchio, Recycling Director,
Georgetown University
Arizona State University ―The machines are working great for the university. We only have to
empty them intermittently, and there’s no maintenance… I’m a believer now.‖ – Ted Woods,
Arizona State University
Oregon Zoo ―I’ve been doing waste services at the Oregon Zoo for 12 years, and the BigBelly
machines have changed my life for the better,‖ says Mark Newberg, Zoo Custodian. ―I have to
make less frequent trips, it’s easier on my back, and it even makes me take more pride in
keeping the area clean. They’ve been great.‖
Bergen County Zoo― Keeping up with the trash is a real challenge for time—we had to empty six
cans daily in the food court, and twice a day on nice weekends,‖ said Timothy Gunther, Zoo
Director. ―We replaced the six cans with two BigBellys and now only have to empty them every
other day. It’s been a tremendous time savings.‖
Patriot Place ―In addition to promoting recycling and reducing our waste volume and energy
consumption, we have realized significant operational efficiencies and cost savings for waste
removal.‖ – Brian Earley, General Manager, Patriot Place
The Boston Red Sox ―We have become big fans of BigBelly and are supportive of the continued
deployment of BigBelly compactors into the neighborhoods surrounding Fenway Park.‖ –
Jonathan Gilula, Senior Vice President of Business Affairs for the Red Sox
11
TESTIMONIALS
Larry Prospect, White Plains Road BID, Bronx, NY:―The BigBellys are tremendous asset for
our Shopping streets. They require less attention from our sanitation people so they can place
more attention to other areas. There is no visible garbage and people do not bring their
household refuse to drop in the BigBellys.‖
Margaret McAustin, Councilwoman, City of Pasadena:―There’s a savings to be had because
they require less frequent pick-ups. They were very successful and they were very well
received, and because they can accommodate more trash they result in less garbage around the
trash cans.‖
Scott McGrath, Recycling Coordinator, City of Philadelphia Streets Dep’t:―The wireless
monitoring system has made it very easy to manage our inventory all across Center City. The
ability to sort through historical data by collection route and discover collection patterns gives us
valuable and actionable information.‖
Eric Baker, Special Projects Director for the Kitsap County Commissioners―With all 80
installed, we should save about $48,000 a year in truck expenses, such as fuel and maintenance
costs. On top of that, by not having to pick up the garbage as often, we will save $61,000 in
labor that can be diverted to the maintenance and operation of the parks.‖
Chad Townsend, Town of Banff Environmental Services Coordinator―It is not only an
operational savings, but it’s also an environmental savings from less fuel.‖
Amie Zander, Exec. Dir. of West Ridge Chamber of Commerce, Chicago, IL―We are
thrilled with our BigBelly units. We have been able to go from 2 trash pick-ups per day to once
every 3 days indicating that they hold 6 times as much as our regular trash receptacles. We are
ordering more BigBelly units for next year with a goal of replacing all our trash receptacles with
the BigBelly in the next few years.‖
Michael Lambert, Aide to Mayor Curtatone, City of Somerville, MA―Somerville is a densely
populated city with a tight budget – so we are always seeking ways to do more with less. We
had a number of constantly-overflowing trash cans in our squares that City staff were visiting
four times a day or more for collection. We did a several-month test trial with five BigBellys, and
they made a big difference. We’ve now dropped to one collection per day at our busiest spots,
saving valuable staff time. The BigBellys eliminated unsightly and unhealthy trashcan overflow
at each site they were placed, even at our Dunkin’ Donuts/Bus Stop location, and our residents
have noticed with approval. We decided without reservation to purchase the trial units, and we
plan to budget for more in the spring.‖
David Cohen, Mayor of Newton, MA―Utilizing these compactors, we have saved money by
reducing collections while at the same time eliminated unsightly overflowing trash cans, and
reducing pests and odor…The BigBelly trash compactors exemplify our willingness to find
innovative, environmentally friendly projects to enhance our community.‖
Mark Stodola, Mayor of Little Rock, AR―The BigBelly is an innovative, sustainable, cost-
effective product that appears perfectly suited for our River Market District and other downtown
areas. During hard economic times when the City is considering a budget with dwindling
revenues, it is encouraging to learn about a product that has already produced significant
tangible results in reducing costs in other cities.‖
Tim McCarthy, Principal Assistant to Commissioner of Public Works, City of Boston―It
has a ton of benefits – it will save the city time and money, keep litter from overflowing, and
discourage illegal dumping of trash. This will save us a lot of time for guys to fill potholes, fix
sidewalks, and do other things.‖
Marie Torniali, Exec. Dir., Steinway Street Improvement, NYC―The BigBelly has been
terrific for our beautification efforts: you can see all the trash with the other cans, which is quite
unsightly; but the BigBelly creates a much nicer look.‖
Thomas Menino, Mayor of Boston, MA―The solar trash receptacles have to go citywide. It will
give us a more productive work force because you don’t have to pick them up every day.‖
12
Michael Nutter, Mayor of Philadelphia, PA―This technology will save taxpayers money,
introduce sidewalk recycling and keep our streets clean. This is one more important step
towards achieving our sustainability goals.‖
Rob Gogan, Recycling & Waste Manager, Harvard University:―We like the BigBelly
[compactors] because they can hold four times more litter than a non-compacting barrel. That
means no unsightly, pest-friendly litter spilling out of the barrels. It also means that Harvard
produces 1/4th the greenhouse gas from vehicle trips to service the barrels, less vehicle noise
and air pollution, and fewer times that a truck has to disrupt pedestrian traffic. Most
gratifyingly, the new set-up will give Yard visitors the chance to recycle their cans, cups, bottles
and papers all across the Yard.‖
Michael Lyons, Senior Buyer, Boston University―During the 2009 fall semester the
University installed 33 BigBelly solar trash compactors and recycling receptacles. Beyond
reducing the frequency of trash pick-ups and expanding our recycling program, they provided a
meaningful step toward increasing visibility for the University’s new sustainability program.‖
Ted Woods, Refuse Coordinator, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ―I was skeptical at
first, but to my amazement, the machines are working great for the university. They’re very
attractive and people really use them. We only have to empty them intermittently, and there’s
no maintenance – we don’t have to worry about them at all. I’m a believer now.‖
Bill del Vecchio, Recycling Director, Georgetown University―The results have been nothing
short of incredible, with waste collection being reduced from seven times per week to two.‖
13
PROPOSTA COMUNITARIA
Sperimentazione sui lungolaghi con rimozione dei cestini tradizionali e sostituzione con i bigbelly.
Creazione di un progetto FINANZIATO con una partecipazione al max del 50% dell’investimento
Investimento iniziale pari a 40 pezzi (5 per i comuni a lago e 2-3 per i comuni montani).
Investimento di circa 160.000€ su 9 comuni (con una quotazione di 4000€ a pezzo – da trattare con l’importatore)
Se si riesce a trovare un finanziamento 80% il costo per comune medio di 3555€ per comune.
14
EDUCAZIONE AMBIENTALE COMUNE
Formazione ambientale coordinata nei plessi scolastici del PAG
Circa 30.000 scuole che partecipano ogni anno in 54 Paesi, più di 7 milioni di studenti coinvolti
7 Passi che vengono sviluppati dagli studenti e dagli insegnanti in maniera partecipativa
La scuola risparmia e migliora i suoi rapporti con il territorio acquisendo maggiori risorse
Si aderisce ad una rete internazionale di scuole fonte di idee per creare nuove opportunità di crescita
Massimizzare i risultati in termini di educazione alla sostenibilità ad un costo minimo (540 euro per edificio
scolastico);
15
PROPOSTA COMUNITARIA
Adesione al Progetto Eco-Schools mediante una struttura comunitaria o consortile.
E’ possibile sviluppare anche un progetto che copra l’intera area Gardauno con un Budget di 15.000€/annui.
E’ possibile sviluppare un progetto su base PAG con un contributo provinciale da 4000 a 8000€ /annui. (contributi
straordinari finalizzati al finanziamento di iniziative di carattere promozionale, didattico e divulgativo delle
tematiche ambientali)
16
OBIETTIVI PER IL FUTURO
Per il raggiungimento di una completa politica rifiuti Zero
Bozza in aggiornamento e in lavorazione
17
OBIETTIVO 1
OBIETTIVO 2
Raccolta Porta a Porta Spinta
OBIETTIVO 3
Compostaggio.
Raggiungibile con il modello del Compostaggio Locale.
OBIETTIVO 4
18
19
20
OBIETTIVO 5
Riutilizzo, Riparazione e Decostruzione
OBIETTIVO 6
21
Introdurre Last Minute Market http://www.lastminutemarket.it/ nella nostra zona
Last Minute Market è una società spin-off dell'Università di Bologna che nasce nel
1998 come attività di ricerca. Dal 2003 diventa realtà imprenditoriale ed opera su tutto
il territorio nazionale sviluppando progetti territoriali volti al recupero dei beni invenduti
(o non commercializzabili) a favore di enti caritativi. LMM si avvale di un team operativo
giovane e dinamico affiancato da docenti e ricercatori dell'Università di Bologna. Con
oltre 40 progetti attivati in comuni, provincie e regioni Italiane, LMM ha consolidato un
metodo di lavoro efficace ed efficiente che permette di attivare in maniera progressiva il
sistema donazioni/ritiri tenendo sotto controllo gli aspetti nutrizionali, igienico-sanitari,
logistici e fiscali.
Nella fase di sviluppo dei progetti, oltre al coinvolgimento dei soggetti donatori e
beneficiari, lavoriamo a stretto contatto con gli assessorati alle attività produttive, alle
politiche sociali e culturali degli enti locali, con prefetture e ASL in modo tale da
garantire la perfetta conformità con le normative vigenti, la trasparenza delle
procedure, il monitoraggio e la quantificazione dei risultati ottenuti.
Progetti con alto contenuto innovativo, studiati su misura degli interlocutori, si
realizzano così grazie allo stretto contatto tra il mondo universitario della Facoltà
d’Agraria dell’Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna e attori imprenditoriali e
istituzionali.
Attraverso LMM le Istituzioni vedono diminuire il flusso di rifiuti da gestire e ottengono
maggiori risorse per l'assistenza alle fasce più deboli della popolazione.
Un'Istituzione (pubblica o privata) può realizzare grazie a LMM una rete locale in grado
VANTAGGI
Prevenzione e riduzione della produzione dei rifiuti
Ottimizzazione delle risorse disponibili
Realizzazione di una rete locale con imprese e Terzo Settore
Miglioramento dell’assistenza alle fasce più deboli della popolazione
Sensibilizzazione della comunità sulla riduzione degli sprechi
Adesione ad un progetto di rilevanza nazionale
I NUMERI
Alcuni esempi di progetti LMM realizzati grazie all'intervento delle Istituzioni locali sono:
OSPEDALI
Da uno degli ospedali di Bologna si recuperano ogni giorno 30 pasti pronti presso la
mensa, per un valore complessivo di oltre 35.000 euro all'anno.
FARMACIE
A Ferrara si recuperano, presso le farmacie comunali, parafarmaci e farmaci da banco
per un valore complessivo di circa 11.300 euro all'anno.
22
SCUOLE
A Verona otto mense scolastiche recuperano circa 8 tonnellate all'anno di prodotto cotto
che corrispondono a circa 15.000 pasti.
TASSA SUI RIFIUTI
In alcune città, grazie a un accordo tra istituzioni e aziende multiutility, si è riusciti a
ottenere uno sconto sulla Tariffa di Igiene Ambientale (TIA) includendo anche lo
smaltimento di parafarmaci e farmaci da banco.
Creazione di punti vendita senza imballi o incentivi economici per gli esercenti
a iniziative simili (http://www.effecorta.it)
23
OBIETTIVO 7
Proporre incentivi economici per la raccolta differenziata con l’applicazione di una TIA (Tariffa
Igiene Ambientale) Puntuale con la logica del Pay by Bag.
24
CASE STUDY IN MERITO AI
PROGETTI COMUNITARI
25
JK 5100
JK 5100
Compostaggio Comunitario?
Oggi si può!
Joraform AB
Il compostaggio reso facile e conveniente!
Funzionamento
Qualità
Abbedissan (Suède)
les sacs de granulés, la pelle utilisée pour leur introduction et les consignes de dosage fournies par le fournisseur
Organisation interne : qui fait quoi, temps passés
alimentation du
-alimentation manuelle tous les matins
fermenteur
-le jardinier est chargé de ces opérations, qui, étant considérées très simples,
conduite du
pourraient être accomplies par n'importe quel membre du personnel
compostage
Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software
http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.
maintenance aiguisage des couteaux du broyeur avant le broyage de restes de gibier (os…)
Suivi du fonctionnement
bilan matière, il n'y a pas de suivi, on peut estimer une production de 1-1.5 t/an de compost pour
performances 4-6 t/an de déchets alimentaires
-le fonctionnement n'est pas contraignant pour le personnel, en dehors des pointes
-surcharge du fermenteur lors des pointes, peut nécessiter beaucoup de structurant
commentaires, -émissions ponctuelles d'odeurs
problèmes, -fonctionnement impeccable de 2001 à 2007, lorsqu'une fuite au niveau du broyeur
évolutions… a obligé au remplacement d'un composant électronique
-amélioration technique apportée par le fabricant au joint d'étanchéité
-le fermenteur peut être déplacé facilement pour l'entretien à l'aide d'un transpalette
Aspects économiques
temps journaliers :
fonctionnement -acheminement des déchets : 10 min
-alimentation du fermenteur et conduite du compostage : 30 min
grande satisfaction du maître d'ouvrage, qui profite du compost et réalise un gain de
Bilan
temps et d'argent (quelques centaines d'€/an sur les coûts de collecte)
CA S E S T U DY
BigBelly Solar
C O M PA C T I N G T R A S H V I A C L E A N S O L A R P O W E R W I T H S O L I D W O R K S
• Developed the world’s first solar-powered BigBelly Solar designs and manufactures innovative solar-powered trash
trash compactor compaction systems that lower fuel costs and carbon emissions by reducing
garbage truck trips. Used in busy places – such as shopping districts, food
• Increased sales 300 percent following courts, and entertainment venues – and in remote locations – including parks
product redesign and beaches – the BigBelly trash compaction system uses the sun’s energy to
compact and store five times the amount of garbage as trash receptacles of the
• Cut material costs by using 30 percent same size. By decreasing the number of garbage pickups required, the BigBelly
fewer steel parts
generates cost savings and reduces exhaust emissions at the same time.
• Improved design quality and control According to Jeff Satwicz, BigBelly Solar product manager, the decision to
standardize on SolidWorks® CAD software during the early conceptual design
phase was an important factor in ensuring that ongoing development would satisfy
growing customer demand. “We made the decision to use SolidWorks software
as our standard platform from the very beginning,” Satwicz recalls. “Initially, we
outsourced much of the early design work to consultants who had a variety of
design packages to choose from. We instructed them to use SolidWorks software
since we intended to use it when we brought the design work in-house. We had
one design partner use a competitor’s product on a major project. We ended
up transferring the design back to SolidWorks because we were happier with
SolidWorks as a CAD design tool.”
BigBelly Solar chose SolidWorks software because of its ease of use and
widespread popularity among partners. The company also valued the software’s
visualization, sheet-metal design, and integrated analysis capabilities. “I had used
SolidWorks in college and had become proficient with it. Our vendors all used
SolidWorks software, and the initial design was done on that platform. SolidWorks
was simply the most logical choice for us to take this product forward,” Satwicz says.
“Our vendors all used SolidWorks Innovating the first solar-powered trash compactor
software…SolidWorks was simply the
BigBelly Solar used SolidWorks software to take the BigBelly solar-powered trash
most logical choice for us to take this compactor from a single proof-of-concept prototype – that debuted at Colorado’s
product forward” Vail Ski Resort in 2004 – through several additional demonstration prototypes
to a full commercial product run in the spring of 2005. A product redesign was
Jeff Satwicz, Product Manager
completed in 2007. During BigBelly’s first year on the market, the company
realized a four-fold increase in unit orders, and then tripled sales following the
product redesign in 2007. The innovative compactor – which stores energy via a
protected solar panel to drive an electric motor that compacts trash – can operate
for a full day with the energy equivalent used to toast a slice of bread.
“Because we decided to use SolidWorks, we had the tools to optimize the design and
accelerate development, enabling us to cultivate and grab a significant share of this
market,” explains Satwicz. “We not only delivered the world’s first and only on-site
solar-powered trash compactor, but also quickly refined and improved upon our initial
design. We plan to continue that effort by leveraging the integrated analysis tools
available with SolidWorks software.”
“By using SolidWorks for mechanical design, we can make use of the pre-
packaged sheet-metal features, which integrate seamlessly with our sheet-metal
manufacturer’s system,” Satwicz notes. “Because we are working with the same set
of data, we eliminate a lot of guesswork from the sheet-metal fabrication process,
which results in fewer surprises and consistently high quality.”
SolidWorks is a registered trademark of Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp. All other company and product names are trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective owners. ©2008 Dassault Systèmes. All rights reserved
MKBIGCSENG0808
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
CASE STUDY:
COST‐SAVINGS FROM SOLAR‐POWERED COMPACTORS FOR
TRASH AND RECYCLING
Impacts of Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors, Companion Recycling Units and
Wireless Notification Technology on Operating Costs, Fuel Consumption and
Vehicle Emissions in Center City Philadelphia
Inaugural Report
June 2009
CONTENTS
Executive Summary 2
Case Study 3
Appendix A: City of Philadelphia public relations and education programs 9
Appendix B: Savings analysis from four collection routes 13
Appendix C: Product specifications 14
Appendix D: Completed maps of existing collection routes 16
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 1
Executive Summary
On April 30, 2009, Mayor Michael Nutter unveiled the first of 500 solar‐powered trash compactors and
210 companion single‐stream recycling units to be installed throughout Center City Philadelphia. The
City had been making 17 trips each week to empty 700 wire baskets throughout Center City, at an
annual cost of about $2.3 million. After replacing those 700 receptacles with 500 solar‐powered
compactors and 210 recycling units, the City collects only 5 times a week, at an annual operating cost of
about $720,000 – representing a 70% savings. Performing those 17 collections each week required 33
workers on 3 shifts, while performing the 5 collections per week under the new program requires only 9
workers on a single shift. The other workers have been re‐assigned to other, more productive tasks.
The deployment plan was a comprehensive package including a 3‐year financing program, a 4‐year
extended warranty and service plan, and a wireless monitoring system on all 500 units.
Highlights of the program include:
• Immediate savings: By entering into a 3‐year financing arrangement, the City has no up‐front
capital cost and will realize collection cost savings in the first year of approximately $850,000.
• Ongoing savings: The City will save nearly $13 million in cumulative collection cost savings over
the next 10 years, net of the equipment cost.
• Annual operating cost reduction of 70 percent: compaction reduces collection demand, which
directly reduces operating costs and associated vehicle fuel use and emissions.
Before After Savings
Collection frequency 17/week 5/week 12/week (70%)
Annual operating cost $2,300,000 $720,000 $1,580,000 (70%)
Cumulative 10‐year cost $23 million $10 million $13 million (70%)
In conjunction with the installation of the solar‐powered trash compactors, the City introduced public
space recycling for the very first time in Philadelphia. Mayor Nutter has launched a major public
relations and neighborhood education campaign called "Philly Throws Green" with a
(www.phillythrowsgreen.org). This program is part of the Mayor’s broader initiative called "Greenworks
Philadelphia" (www.greenworksphila.org), the new
comprehensive sustainability framework designed to
help the City meet its proclaimed goal of becoming
"America's number one green city."
In the current economy, many cities and towns are
actively seeking ways to reduce operating costs and
balance their budgets. The City of Philadelphia is
demonstrating that solar compactors can significantly
reduce annual operating costs in the first year, and for
years thereafter, by reducing collection frequency
requirements. Providing the City’s first public‐space
recycling program and having the ability to track
operations are additional features of the program,
which offers clear economic, environmental and
educational benefits.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 2
Case Study
With a population of about 1.5 million people, Philadelphia is the largest city in Pennsylvania and the
sixth most populous city in the United States. Philadelphia contains many national historic sites that
relate to the founding of the United States, and attracts millions of visitors each year for business and
tourism. Philadelphia’s economy is heavily based upon manufacturing, refining, food and financial
services. The City is also a national center of law study.
The Center City district, located between the Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers and between Spring Garden
and South Streets, represents the heart of downtown Philadelphia and is home to a majority of the
shopping, nightlife, businesses, and historical attractions for which Philadelphia is famous.
Significant waste challenge
The volume of pedestrian traffic in the downtown area creates a significant challenge to the City’s
Department of Streets, the agency tasked with keeping the streets clean and staying current with a
massive public waste challenge. The volume of trash in the district has traditionally required the use of
700 trash receptacles, each collected 17 times per week via four distinct collection routes. The
headcount to staff these routes totaled 33, working three full time shifts at a cost to the City of $2.3
million per year.
A Novel Solution
City officials and specialists from the Massachusetts‐based company BigBelly Solar (the Company) jointly
completed a comprehensive analysis of the number and placement of all trash receptacles, the timing of
the collection routes, and the costs associated with the entire operation. Then, in an effort to maximize
efficiencies for the City, the parties carefully completed capacity planning and determined the optimal
deployment of the Company’s solar compactors, companion recycling units, and related wireless
notification technology. The resulting solution, consisting of 500 “BigBelly” solar compactors and 210
matching single‐stream recycling containers, proved to be a cost‐efficient alternative to current
expensive and time‐consuming collection efforts. The recycling containers represent the first public
space recycling offering ever in the City of Philadelphia, which Mayor Michael Nutter introduced
following the success of the City’s single stream residential recycling program.
Substantial Savings
The solar compactors increase capacity by approximately 5 times compared to the City’s wire mesh litter
baskets, enabling Philadelphia to reduce its collection frequency from 17 times per week to 5 times per
week, and to reduce budgeted staffing from 33 to 9, operating on a single shift rather than three.
Reduced collection trips will also substantially cut related fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions. The
annual cost of collection with the new system is estimated to be approximately $720,000 – representing
a 70 percent reduction from the old system.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 3
The comparison of collection frequency and associated costs under the old system and under the new
system are summarized in the chart below:
Before After Savings
Collection frequency 17/week 5/week 12/week (71%)
Number of workers 33 9 24 (73%)
Number of shifts 3 1 2 (67%)
Annual operating cost $2,300,000 $720,000 $1,580,000 (67%)
Cumulative 10‐year cost $23 million $10 million* $13 million (70%)
*Including the cost of the solar compactor and recycling equipment
Financing the Equipment Costs
The City purchased the equipment through a lease‐to‐own finance program offered by the Company
and therefore was not required to make an upfront capital expenditure to realize an immediate cash
flow improvement. This allowed the City to use the deployment to help close a budget shortfall they
faced for fiscal year 2010. The financing arrangement is for three years, during which the equipment
lease costs will be less than half the amount of the operating cost savings, resulting in a net cash‐flow
savings for the City even during the lease period. Over the ten‐year useful life of the compactors, the
cumulative projected savings that the City expects to realize is about $13 million.
The net operating cost reductions are illustrated in the following graph.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 4
Highlights of the program include:
• Immediate savings: By entering into a 3‐year financing arrangement, the City has no up‐front
capital cost and will realize cash flow savings in the first year of approximately $850,000.
• Ongoing savings: The City will save nearly $13 million in cumulative operating cost savings over
the next 10 years, net of the equipment cost.
• Annual operating cost reduction of 70 percent: compaction reduces collection demand, which
directly reduces operating costs and associated vehicle fuel use and emissions.
The net annual operating cost savings accrue starting in the first year of the program, and over time add
up to a substantial savings for the City, as illustrated in the following graph.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 5
Description of the Solar‐Powered Compactors
The compactors are self‐powered, requiring no wiring or external electrical connection, and
automatically compact the waste when the trash inside reaches a certain level. The solar photovoltaic
panel turns daylight into electricity, which is stored in a small battery inside the unit, allowing the
machine to run at night and during prolonged periods of inclement weather on only battery reserve
power. As users deposit trash, it falls into a 32‐gallon bin inside the machine. When the level of trash
eventually rises above the top of the inner bin, the trash interrupts an electric eye beam, triggering the
motor to compact the trash down into the bin, making room for more trash. Users can safely continue
to deposit additional trash during compaction cycles: the machines have an insertion hopper that
prevents hands from reaching into the compaction area, and do not lock users out during compaction to
prevent litter.
This process repeats automatically as needed until the machine is ready for collection, typically holding
about 160 gallons of uncompacted trash. At that point, the LED light indicator on the front panel goes
from green to yellow, and the machine sends a wireless message to a central computer server, notifying
staff that the unit is ready for collection. (See next section for more information on the wireless
monitoring and notification system.) The machines will continue to receive more trash and run
automatic compaction cycles even after signaling they are ready for collection. The units can be
adjusted to provide earlier or later notice that collection is required. Eventually the machines will be
unable to compact any more trash in the inner bin, and the LED indicator will be red, notifying staff that
immediate collection is required. The units will still continue to accept trash after they are full, since
there is room inside the machine above the inner bins, preventing litter until crews come to empty the
machines.
Collection crews empty the compactor units much like other ornamental street receptacles: they open
the front door with a key, slide out the inner plastic bin and pull the liner bag full of trash. After
replacing with a new liner bag, crews slide the bin inside the machine, close the self‐locking door and
the unit resets to “green” status.
The recycling units are attached to the solar‐
powered compactors to facilitate separation of trash
from recycling. Both units have the same overall
design and appearance for aesthetic purposes and
to help guide members of the public as they look to
dispose of trash and recycling in the appropriate
receptacles. The recycling units are non‐
compacting, and have a 50‐gallon inner bin. As with
the trash compactors, crews unlock the front door
to remove the inner bin.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 6
For a more detailed description of the equipment see Appendix C: Product Specifications.
Wireless Monitoring Technology
The solar‐powered compactors are all equipped with the Company’s wireless monitoring and
notification system. The system uses text message technology to signal a web‐based database that
allows the viewing of machine status and fullness levels from any computer with internet access. This in
turn allows managers to ensure that the trash is collected when needed but no more often than needed,
to optimize collection efficiency. Having intelligence from each trash receptacle on a collection route
enables route optimization on a real‐time basis. The City plans to use the historical data collected by the
system to further refine their collection routes over time and realize incremental efficiencies.
Extended Warranty and Service Plan
The solar compactor project includes a four‐year on‐site service and extended warranty program
bundled in to the equipment lease, whereby the Company contracted with local minority‐owned service
provider Advanced Enviro Systems. This program gives the City a local service company to ensure the
machines are operating properly through the financing period and for a full year afterward.
Other Benefits Associated with Compactor Deployment
The City identified a number of other tangible benefits of the solar‐powered compactor deployment
beyond the cost‐savings described above:
• Reduced truck traffic – avoiding 12 collection trips per week, and avoiding the second or
third collection trip each day, keeps collection vehicles off the streets and thereby reduces
congestion, traffic and road wear
• Reduced litter – the compactors are enclosed, which decreases litter and improves the
cleanliness and appearance of public spaces
• Pest‐resistant – the compactors’ enclosed design prevents rodents, birds and other pests
from accessing the trash
• Reduced C02 emissions – reduced collection trips leads to reduced fuel consumption and
associated greenhouse gas emissions
• Discourage household dumping – the limited size of the insertion hopper makes illegal
dumping of household or commercial trash more difficult
• Advertising revenue potential – the City is considering potential revenue from selling
advertising space on the compactors and recycling units
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 7
Conclusion
The solar‐powered compactors and recycling units provide the City of Philadelphia with significant
operating cost savings in the first year of the program, and substantial cumulative savings over time:
• Immediate savings: By entering into a 3‐year financing arrangement, the City has no up‐front
capital cost and will realize collection cost savings in the first year of approximately $850,000;
• Ongoing savings: The City will save nearly $13 million in cumulative collection cost savings over
the next 10 years, net of the equipment cost;
• Annual operating cost reduction of 70 percent: compaction reduces collection demand, which
directly reduces operating costs and associated vehicle fuel use and emissions.
The program also supports the City’s commitment to advancing recycling and sustainability by
introducing public space recycling to the City for the very first time, and by reducing waste collection
vehicle trips by 70 percent. With the solar compactors’ wireless monitoring system, the City is
demonstrating leadership by using cutting edge technology to streamline operations and maximize
efficiency. As Mayor Nutter announced at the press conference on April 30, 2009 for the solar
compactor program: “Today we are proud to announce the largest deployment of solar powered trash
compactors anywhere in America. This technology will save taxpayers money, introduce sidewalk
recycling and keep our streets clean. This is one more important step towards achieving our
sustainability goals.”
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 8
Appendix A: City of Philadelphia Public Relations and Education Programs
1. Philly Throws Green: The City of Philadelphia has incorporated
the solar compactor and recycling program into a number of
neighborhood education and public relations programs. One of
these has a dedicated website with information about the solar
compactors and public space recycling efforts, called Philly Throws
Green. The website is:
http://www.phillythrowsgreen.org/
“One goal, many hands” is the tagline for the site, which includes
descriptions of how the solar compactors work, a map of locations,
and information on how the machines help:
Philadelphia will have more of these new bins than any other
American city. Here's how that benefits all of us‐economically and environmentally:
Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors
• Five times more capacity than regular bins
• Saves the city money by:
o requiring fewer trash collections
o lowering truck fuel costs
o conserving landfill space
• Reduces greenhouse gas emissions
• Sealed to keep trash and odor in, pests out
• Sturdy and practically maintenance free
• Inspires everyone to keep city streets free of litter
On‐The‐Go Recycling Stations
• Lets you recycle on the go
• Saves the city money
• Single Stream ‐ clean paper, metal cans, plastic bottles, glass jars and all go in this one bin
• Conserves natural resources
• Sturdy and practically maintenance free
• Supports the city's commitment to increase recycling tonnage
• Helps create a greener, cleaner Philadelphia
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 9
2. Greenworks Philadelphia – another program the City has launched to promote sustainability that
includes the solar compactor project is called “Greenworks Philadelphia”. This program has a
comprehensive guide and plan to achieve Mayor Nutter’s ambitious goal of making Philadelphia “the
Greenest City in America.” The website includes an overview video, a downloadable Plan and other
information:
www.greenworksphila.org
3. City of Philadelphia press release – the press release from the April 30, 2009 event follows on the
next page. The release generated print and web articles with combined circulation/audience of about
3.3 million people.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 10
C I T Y OF P H I L A D E L P H I A
Streets Commissioner Clarena Tolson will be joined by Mayor Michael Nutter, Deputy Mayor
Rina Cutler, and other City officials in unveiling the latest innovation.
“We are pleased to be using this advanced technology and embrace ideas like this that will save
us money and natural resources,” according to Streets Commissioner Clarena Tolson.
As part of Commissioner Tolson’s ongoing measures to support the City of Philadelphia’s vision
for high efficiency and innovative services, the Streets Department is adding solar-powered litter
baskets which are cost effective and more efficient than our traditional litter baskets. They will
reduce overflowing, decrease the number of
- more -
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 11
STREETS DEPARTMENT’S INSTALLATION OF
BIG BELLY SOLAR-POWERED LITTER BASKETS
April 30, 2009
Page 2
collection trips and cut related fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions by 80%. It has the
capacity to hold 200 gallons of trash (normal city trash cans hold 55 gallons) and can operate for
a week on the energy it takes to make a pot of coffee.
For the first time in Philadelphia, there will be pedestrian recycling baskets. These recycling
baskets will be set next to 210 of these solar-powered litter baskets to allow pedestrians to place
their recyclables in as they walk by.
The solar-powered litter baskets are replacing 700 wire baskets located in high traffic areas, from
the Delaware River to the Schuylkill River and from South Street to Spring Garden Street.
Installation of the solar-powered litter baskets will start in May and will be completed by July
2009.
###
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 12
Appendix B: Savings Analysis from Four Collection Routes
The City of Philadelphia collected trash from 700 litter baskets installed along four collection routes in
Center City, from Spring Garden Street in the north down to South Street, and from Front Street to the
east over to 24th Street near the Schuylkill River (see Appendix D for detailed maps). The City replaced
all 700 litter baskets with 500 “BigBelly” solar compactors and 210 companion recycling units to achieve
significant time and cost savings from reduced collection demand, as shown below.
Collection Route Details:
Cost Savings Comparison:
BEFORE: AFTER:
Annual Cost of Old Collection System Annual Cost of BigBelly Collection System
No. of receptacles 700 No. of receptacles 500 compactors
210 recycling units
No. of collections per week 17 No. of collections per week 5
Total hours/year on routes 18,564 Total hours/year on routes 5,807
x Total cost/hour $124 x Total cost/hour $124
Total annual cost $2,301,936 Total annual cost $720,068
Annual Cost Savings: $1,581,868
Notes:
1. Total time per collection on all four routes combined is approximately 21 hours.
2. Total cost/hour includes labor, fuel and all other vehicle costs combined.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 13
Appendix C: Product Specifications
Overall Machine Dimensions (Solar‐powered compactor)
Height: 50.4" (128 cm)
Width: 26.1 (664 cm)
Depth: 25.9" (65.7 cm)
Handle Height (ADA Compliant): 41.6"
(105.6 cm)
Weight: 300 lbs (136 kg)
Trash Hopper Insertion Opening: 6" x 17"
(152mm x 432mm)
Bin Volume: 32 gallons
Liner Bag: 32" H, 92" circumference
(recommended thickness at least 2 mil)
Materials
Galvanized sheet metal steel interior and exterior construction (recycled content)
Heavy duty plastic side panels (recycled content)
Exterior Finish: polyester TGIC powder‐coat finish
Trash Bin: low‐density polyethylene plastic leak proof bin (recycled content)
CE approved, RoHS compliant
Compaction Features
Compaction Force: 1250 lbs. max.(570 kg)
Cycle Time: 41 seconds
Motor Size: 1/6‐HP DC gear‐motor
System Voltage: 12 Volts DC
Drive System: Gear‐motor with chain drive
Fully automated, IC processor controlled system
3‐color LED status lamps indicate compacted trash level, machine status and error codes
Photovoltaic System
Polycrystalline silicon cell module
Nominal Output: 30 Watts
Shock‐dampening mount system
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 14
PV panel protected by polycarbonate bubble
Spill‐proof, sealed maintenance‐free 12V battery
Charge maintained by Pulse Width Modulator
Recycling Units (attached to compactor units)
Height: 50.5" (128 cm)
Width: 50.1" (127 cm) (combined)
Depth: 25.9" (65.7 cm)
Weight: 470 lbs. (combined)
Insertion height: 42.5” (108 cm)
Galvanized sheet metal steel interior and exterior
construction (recycled content)
Exterior Finish: polyester TGIC powder‐coat finish
Recycling Bin: low‐density polyethylene plastic leak
proof bin (recycled content)
CE approved, RoHS compliant
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 15
Appendix D: Completed Maps of Existing Collection Routes
The following pages include an overview map of the four collection routes in Center City and 11 detailed
“basket area” maps showing specific locations of all 700 of the old litter baskets that were in the area.
The 500 solar compactors and 210 companion recycling units have replaced these 700 litter baskets.
The City plans to create a revised set of collection maps showing all the new units.
Case Study: Cost‐Savings from Using Solar‐Powered Trash Compactors in the City of Philadelphia June 2009 16
(
!
22ND
!
( !!
( (
(!
!(!
(
MAPBOOK OVERVIEW
RID
((
!
!!
BR O AD
( (
!
GE
GIRARD
05TH
02ND
COLLEGE
(
!
GE GIRARD
COLLE GIRARD
(!
! (
T
!
((
! (
!
FRON
GIRARD (!
! ( (
! G
(IRA!
!
!
( (RD
(!
! ( (
! GIRA (
!
RI
B R O AD
R!
D
(
DG
E
(!
! (
!!
((
KE FAIRMOUNT (!
!
RI
(
LL
DG
!
(
05TH
Y
E
(
!
02ND
(
!
11
BROAD
SPRING (
!
RID
N SPRING
GARDE
RD ING
22ND
GE
(
!
EN
( GAR!
! (DEN SPRING (
!
GA PR
(
!
RE
(
! (
! (
! SP
(
! ( GARDEN
! RIN
S
6TH
B (
! G G SP
AWA
15TH
FR ENJ ! (!
( (
! (
! (
! ( A RDE
! RING
10
21ST
(
! (
! N GA SPRING
AN AM ! RDEN SPRING SPRING
16TH 1
( (!
!
11TH
D
18TH
GARDEN
08TH
( SPRING
DEL
GARDEN GARDE SPRIN
17TH
KL IN!
BROA
04TH
( ( GAR G
24TH
20TH
N !
15TH
(GAR!
TH 19TH
DEN !
ND
IN!(!
( B ( !
! (!( ( (
! DEN
E (
!
13TH
(
!
12TH
FR N
02ND 02
R
(!
! J C A LLOWHIL (
!
08TH
NK AM
COL TOPHE
A!
( !
(! (
22ND
07TH
06TH
RI
US
( L
11TH
(
!
05TH
21ST
04TH
IN
H
03RD
DG
L (
! CALLOW
UM B
18TH 18T
(
! IN HILL
19TH 19
E
( !
! (!
(! (
!
23RD
W ( (
! (
!(
! V IN
IS
IN
10TH
( TER (
! (!
!(!
( E VIN CALLOWHIL
( !
! (! VINE VIN E VINE VINE CALLOWH
ILL
H
(
! L
CHR
(
!
ST
09T
E VINE VIN ! ( VINE VINE V
TH
(
! (
! E(!
RACE VINE INE VIN
05TH
21ST 21
(
! N VINE
GA VINE VIN E
20TH 20
07TH FRANKLIN
( LO
02ND
23RD
E VINE V
BROAD
INE VINE
22ND
! RACE R
(!
(
06TH
!
B ACE RACE RA
19TH
TH
04TH
(
!
18TH
COL OPHER
FR EN (CE RACE H
TH ST H
(
! (!
( !
15TH
ARCH AR ! (
!
T
(
!
11TH 11
(
! 09TH 09T
US
J
7
03RD
JOHN ! C H (
! (
! (
! R
05
(ARCH ARCH A ! (
! AN ! A! A(C (
! (
!
CHERRY (E
13TH
( ! ! (M !! RACE
12TH
F KENNE (JOH ! ( ( ( (
! (
!
UM B
NF R C KL ! (IN (
! R ACE
(
! (H ARC!
(!
! (
! (
! BENJA
DY K
ENNEDY JOHN F (H! IN (
! (!
! RA! (!
C(E
6 08TH
IST
(N(F ! ( ! M
D
NNEDY R
OA
15TH
MARKET ( (
! (
! C H A RCH (
! (
! KLIN
E 05
(
! (
! (
! (
!
04TH
(
! K (
! (
! A R
CHR
E C
03RD
MARKET (
! NNEDY ! ( (
! (
! (H (AR!
R
02ND
! (C
19TH
( !
! (H ARCH
BR
(!
!( (
! (!
(! ( !
( MARKET M ( ! (! !
E
( ( !
TH 17TH
13TH
(
!
JUNIPE
(!
! ! ! (
! (
!
12TH
( ! (
! ARCH
NDE NC
(! ( !
!
11TH
( ( ARKET
! (! ( ! (
9 (!
!
NDE NC
(!
10TH
(
!
SO EN
(!
! ( ARCH
8 (!
09TH
(
! (
! (!
(!((! !
08TH
CHESTN (
! (
! (!(!( ARCH AR
07TH
(
! (
!
15TH P
(
! (
!(
!
UT N
U T (
! M (
! (
!(
! (
! (
! (!
! ( C! H
( !
! (! CHESTN ( !
! (A!
(!
! (R!
(KE(T! (!
! ( (
!
!
(
! (
04TH
(
03RD
MA! (
!
(( ! ( ! (! (R!
H
( K!
02ND
SANS!(! (! (
! UTCHES ( !
! ( (
! (( ET!
( M A (
!
13TH
17TH 17
((
! R (
!
21ST
( !
! T N (
! (
! (!
! (
!(!
! ( !K E! (
!(
!
INDEPE
OM (
! (
! (
! ( (
!(
!UT ( (
! (!
! ( (T(
! M A R (!
!(
INDEPE
SANSOM (
! ((
! (! ( ! (!
! ( K! ET (
!
10TH
(!
! (!( ( ESTN! (!(! (
WALNUT
OM ! (! ( ! ( CH! (!
09TH
( (!
!( ! (! (!
UT
( ! (
! WAL! (N
M SANS !
(
!O(M ! (!
(!
(!
(! (!(!
(!(!
!
((
!(!
((
!(
! (
!
(
!(
!UT
(
! (
! (
! (
!(
!
(
! (!
!(! (! (!
(!
! ( !
!
((!
(! (!
(!
!
(!
( ! (
(
! (
! U S C
D 02ND
( ! T W A N (
! (
! (
! (
! H E (!(!(!
TH
( ! (
! A L N U (
! (
! S O M (
! (
! (
! (
! (
!(
! (
!S TN U (
ND
( ! ( ! (
! T W (
! S A (
! (
! (
! (
!(
!
(
! (
! (
! (
! T (
!
21ST
(
! A N (
! (
!
TH
( (
!
(L!N! (
! (
!
SOM SANS (
! ( (!
! (
!(!
! (
! C H
(!
! (! UT OM ! ( ! ESTN
20TH
(! (
! (!
( (
15TH 15
( (!
!( ( ! (UT (
!
TH
WALNUT (!
!(!
!(
23RD
(
!((!
!
ND 22
( ( !
! ( ! (!
!(
! (
! (!
!
(
!
4 (!
!(
BROAD
( !
! (
! (!
!
17TH
13TH 13
(( (
! (!
! (
! ((!
! ( !
! (!
!(
(
! ( C!
04TH
8TH
W ( ( ( HESTN!
16TH
(
! (!
( (
! A (!
(!
03RD
L (
! (!
11TH 11
(!
! (
!(
! (!
!( N U
( T !
! ( (!
!( (
!(
!! (!
(
(!
!(! (
UT
( (!
( !
19TH
(
!
O NT
SPRUCE
WASHINGTON
(!
( (
12TH
(!
! ( W
( ALNUT N
TH
!
08TH 0
SPRUCE (
!
02ND02
(
!
10TH
09TH
(
!
S PRUCE S (
! (
! (
! (
!
5
TH
(!
! ( ( !
!
07
(
! (!
!(! (!
( PRUCE! ( (
R
(
!
22ND 22
(
! (!
! ( ! ( ! (
23RD
!
PINE PIN (S!PRUCE ( (
! (
! FRONT F
16TH
06TH 06
! (
!
05TH
( (
! (
!
TH
04TH
E PINE (
! (!
(
3
03RD
E SP!
15TH 15
(
! RUCE
2
TH
( M !
21ST
( (
! (!
! ! (PINE !
18TH
12TH
( (
! P IN E
(
! S (
!
09TH
(
! O UTH SO (
! LOMBAR (
! P INE PINE (
! (
!
08TH
(
! (
! (
! (
!
(!
! UTH SOU (
!
(!(D ! (
! (PINE PINE
! (
!
23RD
( ! (!
( (
! (!
! TH ! ( (PINE
!
(
! ( (!
! (
!(
! (
!(
! (
! L!
(OMBARD ! ( (
! (
!
(!
(!
(! (!
((
! (!
! (
! (
! L(OMBAR (!
! ( (
!
D
(!
( ( (!
!(!
! (!
( ! (! (!
! ( D!
! (L!
! (
!
N
(!
! ! (
!( (!
! ( ! (
( (!
( (
! OMBA
(!
02
(
! ( (
! (
!
(!
! (
!
( (
! (
! (
! ( (RD
!
22ND
(
!(
!(
!
(
! (
! (
! (
!(
! (
!
(
! (!
! (!(!
(!(!
(!(
( !
! (!(!(!
(!(! (
! (
!
(
!
(!
! (!
(! (!(!
(! (!
! ROUTE
BROAD
(
(
! (! (! (!( (!
! (! (
(
! ( ! (
(
! ( !
! ( (
!
(!
! ( (!
! (
(!
!(!
(!(!
( ! ( (
!
1
CHRISTOPHER
(!
!( (
!
(
! (
!
1
COLUMBUS
(
!
(!
! ( (
!
BROAD
(
! (
! (
!
(
! (
! (
! 2
(
! (
! (
! (
!
WASHING (!
! (
T ON
(!
! (
(
! 3
(
! (
! (
!
(
! W ASH
(!
! ( I NG (
! 4
(
! (!
! ( T ON (
!
(
! (
! (
!
5
22ND
(
! (
! (
!
BROAD
(
!
(!
!( WASHIN! (GT (
! 6
(
! ON
(
!
(!
!( (
! 7
BROAD
(!
!(!
( (
!
TASKER
(
! 8
!
(
(
!
( !
! (
?
(
! ?
(
! ?
?
?
?
?
S!
(PRUC
05TH
?
? ?
02ND
E ? (
!
BASKET AREA 1 SPRUCE
04TH
CYP
? S!
(PRU
?
? RESS CY CE ?
03RD
? PRESS ? SPRUCE
? SPRUCE
? ? ?
AN
CYPRES
05TH
?
S CYPRE (
!
? SPRUCE
SS CYPR
AMERIC
DELANC ES ?
PHILIP
S
? ? EY
?
LAWREN CE
CE LAWREN
02ND
?
03RD
FRONT
COURT DELANC
?
COURT EY ? (
!
E
( DELA
!
?
?
TH
NC ?
C
EY
RE
PETERS
? ?
?
SAINT
DELANC
LAWREN?
?PINE ?
05TH 05
?
EY DEL
04TH
03RD
DELAWA
? ?
(
! PINE ANC
? ? EY
?
PINE !
( (
!
? PINE
?
?
PINE
?
?
FRONT
ADDISON ADDISO (
!
D
N (
! (
! ? PINE
N
03RD
(
!
EL L
?
05TH
02
04TH
?
(
! ? (
!
?
?
? (
! (
!
BLACKW
?
? LOMBAR STAMPE
? ? (D LO
! RS STAMPE
D 03RD
MBARD RS (
!
REESE
(
! ? (
!
?
?
FRONT
(
!
?
LOMBAR
05TH
02ND
?
?
?
(
!
04TH
LOMBAR
?
? D (
!
?
(
!
W
? RD 03R
GASKILL ?
PHILIP
!LO
(
?
REESE
? (
!
LEITHGO
GASKILL
02ND
? MBAR D
05TH
GASKILL ?
?
? GASKILL
?
? ?
?
!
(
?
? FRONT
( (
!
04TH
! !
( (
?
? ! NAUDAIN (
!
O CK
03RD 03
?
? S?O!(UT?
?
(
! ! !
( (( H ! NAUDAIN
! ! (SOU
?
( !
( (TH!
! (
!
02N 02ND
?(
?
(SOUT!
!
05TH
?!( (H SO? (
!
NK
?COCK HANC
U!
(TH SO
W
? (UTH !
!
PAS ?
FRONT
? ( (!SO? (
!
AN
? ? ?KATER
SYU
4TH
LEITHGO
UTH !
D
(
ORIANNA
?
? SO (!
(UTH !
! (
AMERIC
? (
!
?
(
!
04TH 0
?
05TH
( SO
!
?
KATER UTH
(
! ?
P
?
?
?
03RD (
!
?
DELAWARE EX
HEAD
?
?
?
?
? B?
CK HAN
AIN!
(BRIDG HOUSE
HOWARD
?E (
!
??05TH
FRONT
? B!(AINB?
?
BAINBR
02ND
RIDGE
?
?
IDG
(E !
!
?
?
TH
BA!
AINBRID ?
( (
! (
INBRIDG
?
?
? E BAIN?
(
! ?
(
! (
! B BRIDGE !
(
?
(
!
RD
HANCO
04TH 04
?
E ?
(
! ?
?
AN
? BAINBR
03RD 03
? IDG!(E !(
W
02ND
?
?
? ? ?
AMERIC
LEITHGO
QUEEN
DELAWARE EXP
MONR
? FRONT
O? E (
!
IP
?
? MONR IL
?
?
? ? O
? E MONR PH (
! KENILWO
05TH
4TH
O RTH
?
E 2 ND
?
? ? ?
?
MONR
O
FRONT
? E
?
04TH 0
? 3?RD
PEMB MONR (
!
02ND 0
ERTO MONR
? O
??
N
? E !
( O ? E
FITZW
?
?
03RD 0
AT ? ER
PEMB
FITZW
05TH
ERTO
?
?
AT
?
HA?ER N (
!
D 02ND
?
NS
04TH
?
FITZW
?
ON (
!
FRONT
?
3 RD
AT ER
FULTO (
!
?
? 03?RD 0?
? N FITZW
N
ARE
FULTO AT
?
? ER
02ND 02
FULTO N
? ?
? N
TH 04TH
?
? CATH
DELAW
?
RE
ARINE
?
?
? FULTO
E
N
AN
?
ENC
AWA
W
CATH
?
ARINE FULTO
?
FRONT
O
?
AMERIC
CATH N
?
LEITHG
ARINE
R
?
04TH 04
DEL
02ND
KAUF ?
LAW
CATH
A
?
?
FMAN ARINE
?
ORIANN
?
03RD
?
?
?
? CATH
? QUEE ARINE
?
?
CO CK
N ?
02ND
QUEE
? N
?
04TH
FRONT
?
CHR QUEE (
!
?
CK HAN
ISTI N ?
?
A N Q!
(
UEEN
?
03RD
? QUEE
?
CHR
?
AN
?
N QUEE
02ND
ISTI
?
? AN ?
N
?
AMERIC
K HANCO
ISTI K N ?
NNA
A N
?
D 02ND
BECK
? ?
?
A
CHR
D
INE
ORI
?
ISTI
03RD
HOWAR
?
A
FRONT
HANCOC
N!
?
(
? ?
BOD
02ND 02N
MON
?
? TRO (
! BECK
S E
ER
?
?
? ?
INE
MO CHR
MASCH
NTR
?
ISTI
?
03RD
OS AN
?
? SAL !
(
BOD
E
?
TER CHR
04TH
HAL ISTI
A
?
?
FRONT
CAR L N
?
?
02ND
PEN
? TE?R
?
?
? ? CARPENT
?
?
N
E
? ER
ICA
DIN
CARPEN
ING
?
WATER
TER (
!
03RD
ER
BO
02ND
?
NS
?
AM
WAS
ME ?
?
FRONT
H I NG
T ON W
?
YA
ASHING LEA
T ON UE G (
!
? ? ?
MO
?
? WASHING
03RD
?
WASHIN T ON WA
?
? GTON SHINGT
?
??
?
(
!
?
?
?
(
! ?
(
!
(
!
(
!
?
(
! ( ? !(AREA
! BASKET
(
! 2!(
?
(
! (
!
?
? (
!
09TH
(
!
08TH
(
! (
!
CH!
(
ESTNU!
(
07TH
(
!
?
(
! (
! ? T (
! (
! (
!
10TH
(
! CHESTN (
!
?
?
(
! ( !
! ( !
( U T (
!
(
! C!
(
09TH
(
! (
! (
!
?
(
! HEST
08TH
(
! ? NUT!(
?
(
! (
!
?
SANSOM (
! (
! CHESTN
07TH
E
? (
! (
! ? UT
?
(
! (
!
NDE NC
SANSOM ? ( (
! !
IONIC ! !
( (
08TH
SANSOM
?
? (
!
?
09TH
07TH
(
!
10TH
INDEPE
?
(
!
?
?
MORAVIA (SO
!
SAN
NDE NCE
N M ? SANSOM
!
(
?
WALNUT (
!
09TH
08TH
(
!
? (
!
?
?
(
! (
!
WALNUT
?
07TH
(
! ? (
!
INDEPE
?
NC
WALNUT
?
? ( !
! ( WA
EPENDE
L NUT
? GTON
? WALNUT
?
WAL!
(
10TH
NUT
08TH
?
?
(
!
WASHIN
TH WALNUT
09TH
06TH IND
07? !
?
?
SAINT ( (
!
JAMES (
!
(
!
? ?
?
PERTH
?LOCUST
05TH
SON
LOCUST
08TH
?
?WASHING?TON
?
?
(
! ? LOCUST !
(?
(
! SAINT
SAINT S
ELHI
LOCUST
HUTCHIN
? LOCUST JAMES
? JAM AINT
9TH
10TH
(
!
?
DELHI D
0?
JAMES
SAINT
LATIMER !
( ?
PH
DARIEN
? IRVING IR (
!
W
? VING
?
RANDOL
AS
?
05TH
06TH
ALDER
08TH
PERTH
?
09TH
HI
0TH
IRVING
?
NG
?
(
!
LATIME (
!
LO!
(C
10TH 1
TO
MANNIN
SON
G BONAPARTE R ? UST
WASHIN ?
L
GT
N
ON
DARIEN
07TH
SCHEL
MANNIN
?
?
?
G
9TH
HUTCHIN
SPRUCE MANNIN
? G ?
?
SPRUCE
0?
05TH
08TH
06TH
? SPRUCE
?
?
?
? SPRUCE (
!
SPRUCE
07TH
?
10TH
? SPRUCE
?
?
? (
! MANNING
SPRUCE
09TH
? (
! MARSHA
H
?
LLS
?
CYPRESS
TH 06T
CYPRES SPRUCE ?
05TH
? ( !
!
S
07TH
?
10TH
(
!
08TH
SPRUCE
?
?
?
?
!
(
SPRUCE
?
?
09TH
CLINTON ?
06TH 06
CYPRES
?
CLINTON
? S
05TH
?
07TH
?
?
10TH
DELANC CYPRES
?
?
? EY ? S CYPRES ? S
09TH
TH 06TH
REESE
?
?
?
? ?TH
PINE
08TH
( P
! (
!
05TH
INE
?
?
07TH 07
10TH
?
PINE
? PANAMA DELANC
EY
?
?
?
?
?
PINE
? ?
06TH 06
(
! LAWREN
WAVERL CE
TH 05TH
?
PINE
09TH
Y ? COURT
?
(
!
?
TH 08TH
SON
PINE
?
?
CE
10TH
(
!
?
?
07TH
?
PINE
LAWREN
?
HUTCHIN
ADDISO ADDISON
05TH 05
(
!
? ?
9TH
? N PINE
WAVERL ?
(M
!
? ADDISO
LO N Y
0?
08TH 08
?
?
PERTH
BARD ? LOMBAR
TH
(
! ADDISON
?
? D L!
(OMBA
?
?
RD
06TH 06
07TH
? LOMBAR ADDISON
10TH
ADDISO
L!
(
?
D N
?
? OMBARD
RD
? LOMBAR (
!
09TH
D ? (
!
?
05TH
LOMBAR
LOMB
?
07TH
D
08TH
? (
!
RODMAN (
! LO
?
MBAR
?
? ? D
BRADFO LOMBAR!
10TH
? (D
DARIEN
FRANKLIN
RD ?
?
PH
LOMBAR
D
09TH
(
! ?
06TH
07TH
RODMAN
RANDOL
? !( ?
?
(OUT
!
?
05TH
S RODMAN
REESE
? H SO!(? ?
?
UTH SO
?
08TH
!
(
?UTH S!
(
?
OUTH SO RODMAN
( ?
! ?UTH SO?
UTH !
( (
! GASKILL
07TH
(
! RODMAN
SCHELL
!
(
SOUTH
(
!
?
REESE
?
06TH
DELHI
?
08TH
! !
(
?
( !
!
PERCY
(
?
(
05TH
(
!
?
SOUTH !
?
09TH
LEITHGO
? (
?
(
!
?
( !
! ( ( !
! (SO !
?
(TH (
07TH
KATER !
( U
? !SO
UTH SO !
?
? (
! ? ?U(TH ? !(
SCHELL
( (
! ! (
06TH
KATER ! ! ( !
? ? ( (UTH
!
SO
? !(
PH
BAINBRID
?
? GE (
!
LL
08TH
? KATER ?
05TH
BAINBR ?
?
RANDOL
IDGE
?
KATER K
MARSHA
?
?
? ATER (
!
NK
BAINBRID ?
07TH
?
W
GE ? ?
?
? KATER
L
?
SYU
LEITHGO
06TH
BAINBRID
FAIRHIL
D
?
REESE
GE
?
?09TH
MILDRE
BAINBR
SCHELL
?
?
DARIEN
IDGE
08TH
PAS
?
05TH
BAINBRID
?07TH
?
?
GE
?
? BAINBR
? IDGE
? ?
?
(
!
? (
!
?
? ? ? ? ! !
( (
?
?
?
(
!
? (
!
?
?
(
!
(
!
(
!
?
?
(
! (
!
?
? (
!
? (
! ! !
(
?
? 3TH
CHE(ST!
(
UT!
(
JUNIPER
12TH?
(
!
BASKET AREA 3 (
!
(
! (
!
N ? !
(
CHESTN !
? U(T
13TH 1
11TH
BR O AD
(
!
BR O AD
(
! ( (
! (
!
?
!
?
?
!CHES !
(
?
(
! (
! (
! T( (
!
DRURY
(
! (
!
(
!
N ? UT (
!
CH!
(ES
JUNIPER
(
!
?SANSOM
S!
(A
(
!
(
! (
! ?TNU!(T (
! (
!
12TH
NS (
!
13TH
?
? OM SANSO (
!
?
M (
!
R O AD
?
11TH
SANSOM
?
(
! (
!
?
?
MORAV
? SANSOM
10TH
IAN BROAD
R
?
?
BROAD B
(
!
JUNIPE
? SANSOM ? (
!
(
! SANSOM
12TH
?
?
?
13TH
(
!
?
SANSOM
JESSUP
?
(
! (LNU !
! (
?
? WA T (
! MORAVIA
? ? WALNUT N
WALNUT ?
12TH
11TH
(
! WALNUT
WATTS WATTS WATTS
(
!
?
(
!
?
(
!
? (WAL
!
NUT !
( (
!
10TH
?
? WALNUT
?TH
(
!
?
!
( ? W!
(ALN
CHANCE UT ?
LLOR
13TH 13
WALNUT
BR O AD
(
!
BROAD
12TH
(
! (
! ? (
!
?
WALNUT
?
?
CHANCE ( (
! !
?
CHANCE LLOR CH
QUINCE
A (
!
? ?TH ?
LLOR NCELLO
R
CAMAC
R (
!
11TH
JUNIPE
SAINT
?
12TH
SAINT
?
13TH 13 JAMES
?
?LOCUST (
! !
( JAMES
SAINT J
CAMAC
LOCUST AMES
?
JUNIPER
QUINCE
?
10TH
12TH
LOCUST
?
?
?
LOCUST
?
?
11TH
BROAD
LOCUST
?
?
CAMAC
? LOCUST
? LOCU?ST LOCUST
?
12TH
? LOCUS!
(
JUNIPER
(
! LATIME
?
13TH
(
!
BROAD
QUINCE
R
?
T
JESSUP
?
LOCUST
LATIMER ?
?
? ?
?
LOCUST
SARTAIN
? BACH !
( ?
CAMAC
IRVING ?
11TH
MANNIN (
!
?
FAWN
?
QUINCE
BROAD
DELHI
12TH
?
WATTS
? ?
JUNIPER
10TH
?
?
MANNIN IRVING
13TH
?
? SPRUC!
(E G IRVING
?
?
!
( MANNIN IRVING
CAMAC
DELHI
SPRUCE
JESSUP
G IRVING
? ?
BROAD
BROAD
ALDER
12TH
? SPRUCE
CK
QUINCE
R
?
?
11TH
(
!
0TH
? !SPRU
(
?
JUNIPE
?
CE
?
WARNO
? SPRUCE!
(
?
(
!
13TH
10TH 1
CYPRES
CAMAC
SPRUCE MANNIN
S ? G
?
SPRUCE ?
CYPRES SPRUCE
12TH
?
S CYPRE
?
? SPRUCE
SS CYPRES (
!
QUINCE
? SPRUCE
S CYPRES ?
11TH
ER
BROAD
S
BROAD
?
JUNIPER
?
WATTS
?
ISEMING
?
10TH
13TH
CAMAC
BUTLER
?
?
FAWN
H
?
12TH
CYPRES
11TH 11T
CYPRES
?
S S CYPRES
PANAMA S
? PIN!(E PINE !
(
?
PANAMA
QUINCE
10TH
?
?
13TH
PINE PANAMA
?
?
AMAC
PINE
?
? CLINTON
?
PINE ?
?
?
R
2TH
CLINTON
JUNIPE
PINE
?
11TH
?
?
?
PINE
AMACC
?
12TH 1
BROAD
BROAD
(
! PINE
?
WAVERL W ? 10TH
WATTS
?
?
PINE
?
Y AVE ?
?
QUINCE
RL Y
? ??
JUNIPER
PINE
?
?
?1TH
? CAMAC C
WAVERL (
!
?
HINSON
( P
!
ER
Y INE
(
! ADDISON ?
10TH
?
1
13TH
?
ISEMING
(
! WAVERL WAVER
?
?
12TH
Y
?
?
LOMBARD ADDISO
? LY WAVERL
ALDER
? N Y
JESSUP
? LOMBAR WAVERLY W
C
QUINCE
(
! D AVERLY
CAMAC
? SON HUT
BROAD
11TH
(
!
?
AL
?
JUNIPER
? LOMBAR
?
DE
BROAD
(
! ? D LOMB
10TH
ARD WAL
?
TH 13TH
?
LOMBARD ! CON KWAY
?
!
( ? (OM
?
L ? BARD NECTO
12TH
HUTCHIN
RODMA R
?
?
?
N (
!
LO MBARD
BROAD
RODMAN
?
? TH 11TH
RODMAN ?
JUNIPER
(
!
?
?
?
13TH 13
RODMA
?
(
! ? N
?
RODMAN
10TH
(
!
? ?
?
SARTAIN
SO!
?
(UTH
? ( SO!
! (
12TH
(
! ?UTH S(!?
OUTH!
(
?
11TH 11
(
! RODMAN
(
! ( !
!
CLARION
?
( SOUTH
(
!
(
! ? (OUT
!
S
RODMAN
?
?
?H
13TH
10TH
?
SOUTH
?
KATER (
! ? ( S!
!
?
? (
OUTH
?
12TH
(
! KATER SOU
(TH
!
?
?
SOUTH
? !( (!SO?
? ( !
!
N
CLARION
?
(
! KATER ( UTH SO
11TH
(
! (UT
!
CLIFTO
?
(
! ?H
?
ALDER
(
!
?
(
!
?
?
13TH
? ? BAINBR KATER
?
(
! ? IDGE (
!
12TH
(
! ? BAINBRID KATER (
!
?
? GE
?
10TH
DELHI
PERCY
CLIFTON
BAINBRID
11TH
?
?JUNIPER
?
ALDER
GE
?
13TH
BAINBRID
?
KENILW
JESSUP
ORTH ? GE ?
?
? BAINBRID
?
12TH
(
!
KENILW ? GE
?
?
? ?
(
!
(
! (
!
(
!
?
(
!
?
? !
( (
!
(
!
?
?
?
?
!
( (
!
BASKET AREA 4 ?
?
?
? (
!
?
?
(
!
?
?
?
?
? (
!
?
? ?
!
( (
! (
!
(
! ?
?
?
? (
! (
!
?
?
?
(
!
?
?
?
? !!
( ( (
!
?
? (
!
(
! ? (
! !
(
? ? ?
( !
! (
!
?
?
?
?
(
?
? ( !
! ( ? (
!
?
?
?
? ? ?
?
(
!
?
? (
!
?
? ?
? ?
? (
!
?
? (
! ?
?
(
!
?
? ?
? ?
? ? ?
? (
! (
!
? ?
?
? ?
(
!
? (
! ?
?
?
?!( (
!
(
! !
( ? (
!
? ?
(
!
( !
! ( ? ?
?
? ? (
! ?
?
?
( !
!
?
?
( (
!
?
? ? ?
!
( ! (
( !
?
?
? (
!
?
? ? ? (
! ( !
! !
( (
!
(
?
?
(
!
?
(
!
?
(
! (
!
?
?
? (
!
? ??
? ?
(
!
?
(
!
?
?
? ?
?
?
( !
! (
? ?TH?
(
! ? ? !
(
? ??
MORAVIAN
? ?
WA!
(L!
NUT
?
( !
( !
( SANSOM
? ?16?TH
? IONIC
? ?TH
WAL!
TH
? SANSOM
BONSALL
D 23RD
NU
22ND
( (T WAL! (
!
19TH
?
?
?
20TH 20
?
17TH 17
SAINT WALNUT IAN ?
21ST
(
!
R O AD
(
! ?
15TH
(
! ( !
! N (
! ?
?
JAMES ( (
!W A L
?
? JAMES M
?
(
! N UT ! ORAVIAN
?
?
?
O U SE
( WALNU
? ? ? 16TH
SAINT (
! MORAV
? ?
T
? IAN !(!(
? ??
?
R
LOCUST (
! W!
? ? ? LOCUST L (
! (A L N U T
?
23RD 23
JAMES ?
BROAD B
?
?
W A
?
!
( (
! L N UT WAL ?
?
? OCUST (N! (
! ?
? ??
! UT W!
? ? ?
?
?
20TH
(
RITTENH
21ST
CHANCELL (AL!
NUT!
? LOCU?ST
TH 24TH
( (
AM
(
! ?
?
15TH
OR CHANC
? ?? ?
LATIMER
?
ELLOR
?
? ?
?
(
!
17TH
? ? !(
OPAL
(
!
LT
SYDENH
RIT LATIMER SAINT JA
? MANNING MATNENHOUSE
8TH 18
?
MES CHANCE
VAN PE
? (
!
?
?
? ? ?
LLOR
?
?
?
R L O C (
!
?NING UST LO
?
ITTENHO RITTENHO ?
BROAD
?
TH
? ? 24TH 24
?
? ?
21ST
? ?H 1?
??
? SPRUCE TENHOU C U S T
(
! ?!( ?
?
? SE
15TH 15
SPRUCE ? SCHUBE
?
? H?
19TH
RT
?TH
LOCUST
? ? ?
SPRUCE ? MANNIN ? !( !(
SPRUCE ? G ? RITTEN LA T ?
?
22ND
0TH 20T
M A H O IM E
16TH 16
CYPRESS NNING
? USE R
? ? ?
SPRUCE ?
? ?
? ?H 18?TH 18T
M L ATIMER
T
?
?
BROAD
N
?
N ING ?
? ? ?
SPRUCE ?
? ? ?
?
TH
?
21ST 21
? CYPRES SPRUCE
? 2?
S ? ( !
! ?
?
(
24TH
TH 19TH
?
S SPRUCE
17TH 17
BACH
?
?
?
?
? PANAMA (
! SPRUCE (
! ?
15TH
? PANAMA DELA? NCE Y D E LANCEY DELANCE CYPRES ( SPRUCE
!
? ?
?
? ? ?
? Y S ? ?
? ?
?PINE P? SPRUCE ?
? ? ?
BROAD
INE PIN
16TH
C
H 20TH
D Y
?
E LA P R ( !
! ?
?
?E P? PANAMA NCE Y
? ESS (
19TH 19
?
TH 18T
?
? ? ?
?? ?
D
?
? ? ??
E D E
? L
PINE A ?
ICK
CAPITOL
N
Y
? PIN C
21ST
E (
!
?
Y
R
? WAVER?LY PANAMA
22ND
Y
E
CROSKE
?20T?
PELT
VAN
PINE P
?
23RD 23
? DELANC
SMEDLE
?
INE P
CHADW
PANAMA
15TH
UBER
? IN?E E Y
ROAD
?
?
WAVERL
6TH
?18?
Y PINE
?
HICKS
H
1?
D
17TH 17T
? L Y INE ?
22ND
N ADDIS
?
?
BROABD
24TH
?
? ? WAVER W ? ? P?
? ?H 20?TH 20TH
LOMBAR ON A V ERLY
? ?
INE PIN
?
D ?LY W
? ? ?
?E P?
?
ADDISO AVERLY
?
?
? ?? ?
? ?
16TH
?
?
?
? ? ?
NAUDAIN
? (
! N ?
15TH
? LO M ? ?
NAUDAIN B A RD! ? ?
? ?
W
?
(LOMBAR A ?
?
D DISON A V ERL
? ?
BROAD
? D ADDISO Y
?
? ?
NAUDAIN LOMBAR
TH 19TH
WAVERL
? ? ?
? SO? RODMAN ? D
WATTS
?
UTH! ( L N Y ?
H 18TH
NAUDAIN OMBAR (
!
? ?TH ?
ST 21S
? SO?
?
RODMA
?
?
UTH D ?
? N
?
H
SOUTH !
? LOMBAR
23RD
? ? ?
(
! ? RODMAN
?
TH 17T
(
? ? 20?TH 20T
(
! NAUDAIN (
! D ?
S SOUTH ? (
!
LOMB! ?
?
?
? ?22N?
??
AY Y KATER (ARD
D
NAUDAIN
15TH
?
?
? 16?TH 1?6TH 16
? ? ?
19TH 19
? SOUTH RODMAN
? ? ?
GR RR
?
? NAUDAIN ? ?
?
? ? 18?TH 18T
KATER (
! RODMA (
!
?
21ST 21
SOUTH !
? ?BRO?AD BROAD
? ? N
E
?F BAINB? KATER ? ( N RODMAN RO DAIN
A U ?
? ?
?
? ? ?
SOUTH
?
17TH 17
RIDGE (
! D MAN ?
?
TH 15TH
KATER
?
BAINBRID
3 RD
SOUTH RODMA
? GE BAINBRID ? ?N
?
? 20?TH 20TH 20TH
?
KATER ( !
!
22ND
? ( SOUTH
? PEMBERTON ? GE BAINBRID KATER
? ( !
! ( ? (
! S O
23RD 2
U
?TH !( !(SO!(UTH !(
?
? GE BAINBRIDG
?
? KATER
SENATE PEMBER ? ? !(
?
TON P ? ? E KATER (
!
15TH 15
? ?? ?
EMBERT ?
? ON PE ? BAINBR KATER ( !
! (!(
?
? FITZWAT ?
21ST
?
? GE? ?
?
ER M B ERTON ID KATER
?
?
? ?
? BAINBRID
?
FITZWAT P
17TH
E
22ND
M ? ?
ER B E GE (
!
?
?RTON
?
?
FITZWAT
ER ? BAIN?BRIDGE!( !(
?
?!(
?
?
? ?
?
? ?
( ?
? ?
?
?
?
? ?
! ?
?
? ? ? ?
?
?
? ? ? ?
?
(
!
?
??
?
?
??
?
?
?
?? ?
? ? ?
?
?
?
?
?
? ( (
!
?
? !
? ?
?
?
?
?
? ? ? ? ?
? ?
(
!
?
?
? ? ?
? ? ?
?
? ?
?
? ? ?
?
?
?
?
? ? ?
? ? (
!
?
?
? ? ?
? ? ? ?
?
?
? ? ?
?
? (
!
? (
!
?
? ? ?
? ?
?
? ?
?
?
? ?
? (
!
?
? ?
?
? !
( ?
?
?
? ? ?
?
? ? ?
? ? ( !
! (
?
?
? ?
? ? ? (
!
? ? ?
?
?
? ? ? ?
?
? (
!
?
?
?
?
?
?
? ?
?
(
!
?
(
!
?
?
?
?
!
( ?
?
(
!
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
(
!
!
(
?
(
!
?
(
!
?
(
! (
! (
!
?
(
!
?
(
! BASKET AREA
(
! 5 ? ( (
!
(
! (
! !
(
! ?
?
(
! !
( ? ( !
!
(
!
? ( ?
( !
! ( !!
( ( ? (
!
?
(
!
?
?
( !
! (
?
( !
! ( (
!
?
(
! (
! (
!
(
! (
! (
!
?
MARKET!
( (
!
DELAWARE
E
02ND
MARKET (
!
DELAWARE
AWAR
?
MARKET
?
(
!
FRONT
(
! MAR!
(K
P
(
! ET MAR !
(
04TH
(
! (
! (
! (
!
DELEX
?
KET !
( MARKET
?
( !
! ( (
! ? (
!
LUDLOW MARKE
?
BERRY
?LUMBUS BLV
(
! ? T MARKET
BODINE
?
03RD
(
!
?
BAN K
?
( !
! ( (
!
02ND
DELAW
?
04TH
INDEPENDENCE
LETITIA
?
?
(
!
STRAW
RANSTE
FRONT
AD
EXP
ELBOW E
ARE
BLACK
LBOW BLACK
?
ARE
?
HORSE
HE R CO
T
TROTTE
?
HORSE
OPHER
04TH
EXP
DELAW
S
RS
?
BUS
03RD
MARKET
BERRY
(!
! (
! BANK (
!
?
(!
?
(CHESTN
(?
UT
?
LETITIA
!!
( ( !
02ND
( !
COLUM
ISTOP
CH
FRONT
CHRIST
(ESTN
!
?
? U!
(T (
! C!HEST!
( STRAW
?HTR ST
( ?
(
! (NUT (!
! (
NDE NCE
! !
(
(
! ? !
(
? CH(ESTNU!
!
? (T CHESTNUT (!
MARKE
(!
! ((
! (
!
?
C
03RD
(
!
02ND
(
! CHESTN
? UT
?
? ( !
! (
FRONT
( !
!
04TH
INDEPE
( !(
?
(
!
ARE
(
!
IONIC
EXP
DELAW
FRONT
DO
03RD
WALNUT
02ND
?
SANSO
?
WALNUT
CK
(
! M
CK
(
! ? !
(
WAL!
(NU
05TH
T
HANCO
( !
! (
? (
!
FRONT
HE R
WALNU
RE
?
(
! T
?
US
(
! WALNUT!
S
(
04TH
DELAWA
03RD
SAINT (
!
?
WILLING
COLUMB ER CHRISTOP
?
DO
COLUMB
ALLEY
? WALNU
02ND
?JAME!(S T
?
?
CK
(
!
?
WALNUT
RE
?
(
! THOMAS
P ? AINE DOCK
? RD
? (
! PLAZA
DELAWA
05TH
WILLING
W
S
?
WILLING
03RD 03
S
O
04TH
LEITHG
( LO
!
SAINT
FRONT
CUST
?
DO
US
SAINT JA
?
PH
? JAMES MES
CK
05TH
CHRISTO
JOSEPHS
?
03RD
?
JOSEPHS SAINT
?
04TH
PHILIP
?
MARSHA DOCK
? LLS LOCUST
? DOCK
R ALLEL
?
LOCUST
SAINT
?
ER
04TH
E
03RD
(PRUC
!
S
?
C
COLUMBUS
E
?
? SPRUCE
CHRISTOPH
LAWREN
(PRUC
!
?
? S
02ND
E (
!
A
? SPRUCE
?
38TH P
S!
(PR
?
04TH
?
UCE S
? PRUCE S
?
? PRUCE
03RD
AN
? SPRUCE
CYPRES
?
S CYPR (
!
? SPRUCE
PHILIP
AMERIC
ESS SPRUCE
02ND
CYPRES
?
04TH
S
?
?
?
? (
!
? (
!
? ?
?
?
?
? ?
?
(
! (
!
?
?
?
? (
!
(
!
(
! (
! ?
?
(
! ? (
!
?
(
!
?
(
!
? (
! (
!
?
?
? (
!
(
!
?
? (
!
?
? (
!
(
!
?
? ? (
!
? Created: 2-12-09 - MxS
?
?
?
?
(
!
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
(
! ?
?
?
BASKET AREA 6
?
?
?
?
?
? ?
?
?
(
! ?
?
?
?
?
?
?
? ?
?
? ?
?
?
?
?
?
? ?
?
?
?
? ?
? ?
?
?
?
? ?
?
?
?
? ? ?
?
?
? (
! (
!
?
?
?
?
?VIN?E
?
?
WOOD
8TH
1TH
VINE ST VINE
3TH
?
?
VINE REET VINE E
VINE T
?
VIN ET
H
VINE VIN
? ?E VINE ? VINE VINE ?
? 13?TH 1?
TH
STREET EX
?
10TH 10T
08TH 0
EE
VINE ST ?
BROAD
1TH 1
? T E
12TH
P E E R R
?
? REET VINE R T ST
? ?
ST S
KLIN
?
09
?
?ER JUN?IPER
VINE EXP
N
? VINE ?
VINE VIN EXP VINE VIN ? ?
? 1?
CLARIO
? ? E VINE
?
VINE ST ?
SUMMER
? ? REET VINE STRET
ET STR E
N
?
? ?
SUMMER
? E
?
?
FRA
SARTAIN
VINE
EXP ET
H
E
WINTER ?
? EE
TS
BROAD
E S TR X P
VIN ?E STREET E ?
11TH 11T
?
VINE
MARVIN
?
VIN
? ?
WINTER
?
H
?
?TER
WAT
FLORIST
VIN?
CAMAC
? V? ?
VINE INE
12TH
WIN
?
10TH 10T
? ?H
TON
?E VINE
CLARION
?
?
09TH 09T
?
13TH
!
(
?
FRANKLIN
?JUNIP
08TH
?
N CLIF
SPRING
?
SPRING
?
?
RACE SPRING
? ?
SPRING
? R
? SPRING
?
E
(ACE RA
!
?
CAMAC
C
?
?
12TH
(
! ACE RA
11TH
?
CLIFTO
? ?CE (
!
?
RACE
08TH
10TH
?
?
(
! RACE
?
?
? (
!
IN
?
RACE
09TH
?
?
B
L
RACE
? ( (
!
07T
!
FRANK
RACE
?
?
CHER
(RY
! ( !
! ? RACE
?
H
10TH
( RACE
INSON
?
?
11TH
RACE
?
?
(
! (
!
BROAD
RACE
13TH
QUARRY ?
?
(
!
?
12TH
09TH
BROAD
HUTCH
(
!
?
?
CHERRY
?
08TH
? CHERRY
?
?
? 1?TH
CHERRY
? ? CHERRY
( ARCH
!
10TH ?
07TH
JUNIPER
APPLET ? CHERR
11TH 1
ARCH ? REE
?
? Y
? BROAD
(
! (
! ARCH ? (
!
ARCH
8TH
(
!
?
? (
!
?
09TH
10TH
?
ARCH
?
?
13TH
CUTHBE (
! ? (
!
08TH 0
(
! (
! APPLET
?
RT
BROADD
(
! A!
(RCH ? REE
12TH
?
! A!
(
OA
? (RCH
?
(
!
11TH
(
! (
! ? ARCH
?R
?
?
CUTHBE
BR
10TH
( !
! ( ?
07TH
?JUNIPE
JO RT ARCH
( HN F
13TH
?
?
?
K!
ENNEDY ?9TH (
!
?
? ARCH
(
!
12TH
? FILBERT CUTHBE (
! ? A!
(RCH
? ( !
!
?
(
11TH
RT CU
0
FILBERT
? THBE
?
?
RT (
!
10TH
(
!
08TH
FILBERT
?
?
COMME