Sei sulla pagina 1di 11

Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation

UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies


21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK
e-paper no.13

Flower of the Nation:


Gendered Representations of Thailand beyond the Borders
Paweena Subhimaros
University of Leeds
spl2ps@leeds.ac.uk

Abstract:
This paper will explore the relationship between gender and national identities in Thailand
through the construction of Thai national self-representation that reflects in female images. The
issues of representations of women have concerned Thailand’s leaders who historically and
today want to promote a ‘civilised’ image of Thailand. This has significant consequences for
women whose identities, as the public embodiment of Thai culture, become symbolically related
to the concepts of national order and progress. My analysis thus centres on a process of national
imagining, whereby the ideal feminine image was essential in the service of the nation in that it
created positive images of the country.

Keywords: Women, Nation, National Identities, Representations

The conference and the proceedings are supported by the


Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

Introduction
Representations of gender and national identities in modern Thailand are the main theme of this
paper. Following the work of Benedict Anderson (1991), Imagined Community, I argue that
nations and national identities are socially and culturally constructed and they are imagined. As
abstract concepts, they need to be embodied by a certain form of representation. For instance,
national identities can be seen in the way they are experienced and transmitted through objects
such as maps or flags, or through the organisation of collective spectacle such as team sports and
popular culture. In my research, national identities are imagined through the construction of
Thai national self-representation that reflected in women’s images.

If we take a look into the historical background of gender relations in Thailand, it will show that
gender was always a part of international relations. The issues of representations of women have
concerned Thailand’s leaders who historically and today want to promote a ‘civilised’ image of
Thailand. As a consequence, women’s identities became the public embodiment of Thai culture
and are symbolically related to the concepts of national order and progress. According to Van
Esterik (1996), in her studies on the politics of beauty in Thailand, the attributes of gentleness
and virtue are intertwined with grace, and beauty to produce a model of ideal Thai femininity.
The Thai state is still very much involved in the maintenance of this model and has been making
use of it as part of its nation building project since the 1930s (Van Esterik, 1996, p.203).

Flower of the Nation: metaphor of femininity


Gender ideology in the establishment of national identities was conceptualised into the ideology
of “Flower of the Nation” in Thailand’s Nation-Building period, which is the nationalistic years
surrounding the Second World War in Thailand, 1939-1944. Back then Thailand was under the
dictatorship government of Field Marshal Phibunsongkhram. This period was called the
‘Nation-Building’ period according to the nation-building policy he worked in an attempt to
build a ‘new nation’. The ultimate aim of this mission is to maintain the country’s independence
throughout the threat of Western colonisation, and to make Thailand part of the international
society of modern nations. What makes this ‘Nation-Building’ period important to my study is
that it was the period in which the issues of women and the construction of ideal femininity was
clearly one of the government’s major preoccupations in the ‘nation-building’ mission. It can be

2
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

said that, under the reign of Phibulsongkhram, the motive behind the ideology of “Flower of the
Nation” was built upon the ideal of femininity which appealed to the sense of nationalism and
patriotism, in part through the manipulation of gender identities and the disciplining of women’s
appearance and sexual behaviour.

“To make us love our country, our country ought to be lovely.”

(Scott, 1988, p.46)1

It was in reference to the appropriate role for the feminine in the political order that Burke
(1892) wrote the above line. Following Burke’s quotation, I aim to examine representations of
the gendered body as a metaphor for national identity. Scott (1988) also comments that gender is
a way of denoting “cultural construction”, that is the entirely social creation of ideas about
appropriate roles for women and men (Scott, 1988, p. 32). Here I shall explain the meaning of
the ideology of ‘Flower of the Nation’. In Thailand’s Nation-Building period, the idea behind
the ideology of “Flower of the Nation” was to impose ideal feminine identities on Thai women.
At that time, the notion of masculinity largely depended on a chauvinistic and militaristic
nationalism. So, the ideal of manliness was expressed in the metaphor of “Fence of the Nation”,
which mean men got to perform their roles in military struggles to defend their homeland and
the sovereignty of the nation. Alongside the idealisation of masculinity, a feminine ideal is also
put forward. Women became part of the flower symbolic in that they are so dear to the people of
the nation, because the word “flower” has always traditionally been associated with women in
Thailand in terms of beauty, grace and freshness. Therefore, it was not surprising that this
concept was used to metaphorically represent the images of women in this period. Van Esterik
(1996, p.203) comments that representations of women as part of Thai cultural identity focus
mainly on their appearance. In order to live up to the ideology of “Flower of the Nation”,
women had to make themselves beautiful so as to make men happy and perform their duty as the
“Fence of the Nation” well, as commented in a contemporary periodical, Nikorn (1942):

1
quoting Edmund Burke, Reflections on the French Revolution (1892;reprint ed., New York,
1909), pp.208-9

3
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

“Women are the flowers, the sacred gift from heaven… the best incentive that
encourages the bravery in men’s heart.”

(Quoted in Suksan 1995, p. 59)

That is the background of my work. I am currently working on the way the construction of
modern women in Thailand is linked with the formation of a modern nation. I propose that in the
age of globalisation, the process of disintegration of traditional political boundaries seems to
give rise to an increasing importance of culturally constructed mental border. What I am
interested in finding out is the idea of the gendered representation of borders in this respect.
How are Thai national identities conceptualised in terms of gender? And how this
conceptualisation is linked to constructions of gender and national identities in a globalised
world? This is what I set to explore further.

Discourses of national imagery: Thai image consciousness


Van Esterik (2000, p.96) states that, ‘Concern with a civilised face and image has been a
particularly prominent part of Thai national identity formation after contact with European
colonizers active on their eastern, western and southern borders’. For me, it is interesting to
compare the national desire to be seen as ‘civilised’ with what Field Marshal Phibunsongkhram
may have had in mind in the Nation-Building period. Surely there is an echo from the past. But
this time there are no longer the ultimate aims to maintain the country’s independence from the
Western colonial threat like in the early 20th century, but perhaps a desire ‘to site Thainess
beyond the border of the nation-state’ (Reynolds, 1999, p.261). Also according to Reynolds
(2002, p.311), one significant feature of Thailand’s self-representation since the ‘90s is the
promotion of Thailand as a ‘brand name’. Images and representations play a great role in this
process. For instance, the way Thai culture managers and tourism promotion officials play upon
the association of the attractiveness of Thailand as tourist destination and the attractiveness of its
people. In contemporary Thailand, both the official and popular Thai discourses have put several
attempts in constructing Thai person and the nation as ‘attractive’ to the world. And feminine
beauty feature in the formal and informal export of images of Thailand to attract tourists and
investment and to engender a favourable opinion of the country in the perceptions of foreigners.

4
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

However, Thailand has got its dark side, which can be seen as a sexualised national imagery. As
often heard of, Thailand got an undeletable imprint on the popular imagination of the West as
home to a widespread sex industry. As a result, in addition to its common tourist brochure
appellation as ‘the Land of Smiles’, Thailand has become less flatteringly known as ‘the Brothel
of Asia’, its capital Bangkok earning the definition in the Longman Dictionary of English
Language and Culture in 1992 as ‘a place where there are a lot of PROSTITUTES’. This caused
a public denunciation of Longman for creating a poor image of the country (Harrison, 2001,
p.138). This is truly unfortunate because not only does it portray a narrow segment of life in
Thailand, but it pushes beyond and tarnishes an otherwise wonderful image of a country and of
its people.

Other Asian countries or, say, any countries in the world, offered these same sexual enticements,
so why did so many men come to Thailand for this? For me, that is simply because they knew
the cost of living was low, the exchange rate was good, and the people were friendly. Thailand is
still the most visited country in Southeast Asia, but it is not due to its level of prostitution. Each
year, more than eight million foreigners visit Thailand, and who come because they are
interested in its history, culture and seeing its remarkable beauty. Sadly, the conduct of a relative
few has adversely affected the reputation of Thai women, in general. For example, in March
1999, a problem arose between Thailand and Hong Kong about Thai female travellers. Hong
Kong custom officials attempted to assure the Thai Foreign Ministry that clearances of Thai
women required longer periods of time than normal, because of the need to make thorough
checks for fake passports, illegal immigration and occupation (i.e., prostitutes). The women,
however, accused custom officials of undue and unjustified harassment. Despite a Thai Foreign
Ministry request asking Hong Kong authorities to be more considerate of Thai women travellers,
Hong Kong immigration officers were ordered to detain all Thai women below forty years of
age. Nowadays, Thai women are still being treated likewise sometimes when applying for the
visa to countries like Japan or Korea.

In an effort to diminish this image in the popular perception of Thai women in the eyes of the
world, Thai nationalist sentiment and image consciousness has focused on promoting the image
of the morally, and sexually ‘good’ women. Most Thai would prefer that international visitors

5
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

recall the beautiful, graceful, polite, and neatly-dressed women as depicted in the tourist industry
promotion. That is the image of womanhood that is deeply embedded in Thai cultural tradition.
What I am going to do next in my thesis is about this struggle over the power of representation
and the discourse of Thai collective desire to dispel this tarnished image and restore the good
one, in the context of Thai popular media concerning the images of Thai women, especially in
the eyes of the foreigners.

Thai people are obviously aware of this tarnished image and how the world perceives them.
They look somewhat suspicious or disapproved when they see a foreign man in the company of
a Thai woman. This is particularly true when the man is in his sixties, and the woman is quite
young. A Thai automatically perceives the young woman to be a prostitute --- and, of course,
she may be or may be not. However, this perception is generally extended to all Thai women
who are accompanied by foreign men, which is most unfortunate. Not only is this unfair to Thai
women, but it is unfair to foreign men as well. It can be said that Thailand’s need for a clean
international image derives from a strong cultural tendency to bring only the morally acceptable
into the public domain. The images endorsed by the Thai mass media also seek to create a set of
acceptable behaviour. When I was in Thailand doing my data collection earlier this year, I came
across one of the day-time television programmes for ladies. The presenters , one of them is a
famous female superstar in her forties; another one is a gay, well-known scholar, who is
happened to be famous because of the open attitude of his sexuality, talked about the image of
Thai women in the eyes of the Western. They came to agree on the warning point to Thai
women that: if they have ‘farang’ (informal Thai words for foreigners) as boyfriends or
husbands, it is their responsibility to take good care of their appearance and behaviour, so that
they would not be seen or understood as prostitutes.

Ideology of good women: embodiment of female virtue


George Mosse (1985) in Nationalism and Sexuality contends that the intense interest of modern
society in respectability—‘decent and correct’ manners and morals, as well as with a proper
attitude towards sexuality— were intimately connected with the development of modern
nationalism. He examines how female symbols of the nation, such as Marianne and Germania,
demonstrate explicitly how the nation (or the state) uses sexuality for its own promotion and

6
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

preservation. As Mosse points out (regarding the German state), “Nationalism-and the society
that identified with it- used the example of the chaste and modest woman to demonstrate its own
virtuous aims” (Mosse, 1985, p.90). In other words, female propriety, chastity and fidelity, along
with monogamy, all became key tropes of civilised or virtuous nationhood. (Landes, 2001, p.5)

The extensive literature on gender and nation/ nationalism (Yuval-Davis and Anthias, 1989;
Yuval-Davis, 1997; Nagel, 1998; Cusack, 2002; Valerius, 2002) shares a similar viewpoint in
that argue that while women may be subordinated politically in nationalist movements and
politics women are taken to represent tradition and are required to carry ‘the burden of
representation’ (Yuval-Davis, 1997, p.45) as they are constructed as the symbolic bearers of the
collectivity’s identity and honour, both personally and collectively. They are thought by
traditionalists to embody family and national honour, as Valerius (2002) puts it “Women in their
moral chastity and ‘societal motherhood’ were the guardians of collective national honour”
(Valerius, 2002, p. 49).

Women, in their ‘proper’ behaviour, their ‘proper’ clothing, embody the line which signifies the
collectivity’s boundaries (Yuval-Davis, 1997, p.46). This embodiment of female virtue reflects
in the legal justification for women in many societies being tortured or murdered (‘honour
killing’) by their relatives because of adultery, flight from home, and other cultural breaches of
conduct which are perceived as bringing dishonour and shame on their male relatives and
community. Nationalists, therefore, as Landes (2001) argues, often have a special interest in the
sexuality and sexual behaviour of their women (Landes, 2001, pp.99-101). For Landes,
women’s good behaviour is not just a private matter; private morality was intimately tied to
public virtue and state interest.

In Thailand, women’s identity and proper behaviour were in many ways linked to women’s role
in the maintenance of national identity and tradition. Even currently, little has changed in the
areas of society’s expectation and recognition of female identity. Female identity in
contemporary Thailand still remains closely bound up with the maintenance of virtue. There is
certain clarity of division in Thai society between the image of ‘good’ woman and the ‘bad’ one.
Last year, when a very popular reality TV show, Big Brother was introduced for the first time on

7
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

Thai television, it provoked contradictions and cultural uproars. For many Thai people, men and
women spending days and nights together with lots of physical contacts is seen as scandalous.
And when a teenage girl shared a bed with her new-found love who is one of the housemates, it
is unacceptable for many viewers. Considering the girl’s background, it turned out that she came
from a very well-to-do family, and had spent her teen in Europe. The argument went on to as to
what kind of behaviour is acceptable for Thai women and the consequence when it is influenced
by Western points of views. In Thai tradition, although the sexual mobility of young, urban Thai
women appears to have increased in recent years, this remains a subject for the private rather
than the public domain. Harrison (2001) comments that ‘Local media depicts the ‘modern’ Thai
woman as youthful, outgoing, gregarious, fun-loving, and often rather ‘girlishly’ cute, yet avoids
any suggestion of her sexual agency or availability’ (p.139). Underlying this construction of
‘modern’ Thai womanhood is a much older tradition of the feminine, with its emphasis on grace,
beauty, neatness and good manners; and it is these traditional features that nationalist sentiment
accentuates in its presentation of the image of the Thai women, both at home and abroad.

Conclusion
I propose that because of women’s reproductive role, the regulation of women’s bodies and
behaviours is an integral part of inscribing national identities. As reproducers of the race,
women and the control of their sexuality are keys to the nationalist project. It is women’s
symbolic role as mothers and biological and cultural reproducers that is central to the discourses
of national identity. The material effect of these roles is the control of women’s sexuality, which
is seen as central to maintaining national identity. Women’s sexuality, therefore, can mark the
very borders of the nation-state- that is- its purity, the purity of the nation; its impurity, the
impurity of the nation. In the age of globalisation, the desire to site Thailand beyond the borders
can be seen in the way Thai national collectivity is experienced and transmitted by transnational
flows of commerce, capital, tourism, and mass media, In this process, women come to represent
the nation culturally in that they come to represent the attractiveness and virtue of the people.

Even nowadays, little has changed in the areas of society’s expectation and recognition of
female identity. Gendered social value and ideal femininity are still problematic. Barmé (2002)
points out the case of female identity in contemporary Thailand that it ‘remains closely bound

8
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

up with the maintenance of virtue, not to mention the cultivation of physical beauty, an
obsession that is endlessly reaffirmed through the beauty contests’ (Barmé, 2002, p.254). In
contemporary Thailand the construction of images of female beauty (gentleness, demureness,
grace and composure) has occurred by means of beauty pageants, supported by the highest
levels of the bureaucracy as well as the entertainment, advertising, and tourism industries.
Thailand’s international self-representations influence and are influenced by global process such
as tourism, nationalism, and mass media (Van Esterik, 1996, p.203) and feminine beauty feature
in the formal and informal export of images of Thailand to attract tourists and investment and to
engender a favourable opinion of the country in the perceptions of foreigners (Reynolds, 1999,
p.270). Some more questions left for further study should be related as to why it is women who
are to carry such a significant symbolic load (Van Esterik, 2000, pp.108-109). If women are
transmitters of culture and signifiers of Thai culture, how to interpret “Thailand” as a sign and
what is its signified?

Interestingly, some contemporary women activists use the metaphor of the flowers of the nation
as a point of resistance (Van Esterik, 2000,p.105) Chiranan Pitrpreecha, an acclaimed feminist
poet wrote in her well-known poem ‘Assertion of the Flowers’ (1989) that not only flowers are
beautiful, but they also have thorns:

The flower has sharp thorns


It must not bloom to await praises from others
Rather, it blooms to accumulate
Great fertility for the Earth
(Translated by Wajuppa Tossa 1992)2

Behind the myth of “Flower of the Nation”, it is questionable whether this flower lives up to the
dignified image of representing the nation with pride, or whether it just “blooms to await praises
from others.”

2
quoted in Van Esterik, 2000, p. 105

9
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

Reference
Anderson, B., 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of
Nationalism, London: Verso Rev. and extended ed.

Barmé, S., 2002, Woman, man, Bangkok: love, sex, and popular culture in Thailand, Lanham:
Rowman & Littlefield

Burke, E., 1892, Reflections on the French Revolution (reprint ed., New York, 1909)

Chiranan P., 1989, Baimai thi hai pai: kawi niphon haeng chiwit (The Lost Leaf: Poetry of
Life), Bangkok : Anthai

Cusack, T. and Bhreathnach-Lynch, S. (eds), 2002, Art, nation and gender: ethnic landscapes,
myths and mother-figures, Burlington, VT: Ashgate

Harrison, R., 2001, “Prostitution, Politics and Power: Issues of the ‘Foreign’ in Western
Television Documentaries of Female Sex Workers in Thailand” in Munshi, S. (ed.), Images of
the 'modern woman' in Asia: global media, local meanings, Richmond: Curzon, pp. 138- 168

Landes, J. B., 2001, Visualizing the Nation: Gender, Representation, and Revolution in
Eighteenth-Century France, Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Mosse, G. L., 1985, Nationalism and Sexuality: Middle Class Morality and Sexaul Norms in
Modern Europe, Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press

Reynolds, C.J., 1999, “On the Gendering of Nationalist and Postnationalist Selves in Twentieth-
Century Thailand” in Jackson, Peter A. and Cook, Nerida M. (eds), Genders and sexualities in
modern Thailand, Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, pp.261-273

_________, 2002, “Thai Identity in the Age of Globalization” in Reynolds, C.J. (ed), National
identity and its defenders: Thailand today, (Rev. ed.), Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm, pp.308-
338

Samakkhi thai (pseudonym), “Sib song kao khong ying thai” (Twelve Steps of Thai Women) in
Kao Kotsanakarn (Publicity) 6, 8 (August 1943), pp. 238-245

Scott, J.W., 1988, Gender and the politics of history, New York: Columbia University Press

Suksan D., 1995, Society's expectations of Thai women in the "Nation Building" period, 1938-
1944, MA Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

Van Esterik, P.,1996, “The Politics of Beauty in Thailand” in Cohen, C. B., Wilk R. and
Stoeltje, B. (eds), Beauty Queens on the Global Stage: Gender, Contests, and Power, New York
; London : Routledge, pp. 203-232

10
Conference Proceedings – Thinking Gender – the NEXT Generation
UK Postgraduate Conference in Gender Studies
21-22 June 2006, University of Leeds, UK

__________, 2000, Materializing Thailand, Oxford: Berg

Valerius, J., 2002 “Domesticating Britannia: Representations of the Nation in Punch: 1870-
1880” in Cusack, T. and Bhreathnach-Lynch, S. (eds), Art, nation and gender: ethnic
landscapes, myths and mother-figures, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp.15-28

Yuval-Davis, N., (1997), Gender and Nation, London: Sage

Yuval-Davis, N. and Anthias, F. (eds), (1989), Woman-Nation-State, London: Macmillan

11

Potrebbero piacerti anche