Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Weighted
Differential and Integral
Calculus
Jane Grossman
Michael Grossman
Robert Katz
THE FIRST SYSTEMS OF
WEI G HT ED
CALCULUS
Jane Grossman
University of Lowell
Michael Grossman
University of Lowell
Robert Katz
Arahimedes Foundation
Archimedes Foundation
Box 240, Rockport
Massachusetts 01966
Thi s One
3BJ3-F4Q-JQPO
"In general the position as regards all such
new calculi is this - That one cannot accom
plish by them anything that could not be
accomplished without them. However, the ad
vantage is, that, provided such a calculus
corresponds to the inmost nature of frequent
needs, anyone who masters it thoroughly is
able - without the unconscious inspiration
of genius which no one can command - to solve
the respective problems, yea, to solve them
mechanically in complicated cases in which,
without such aid, even genius becomes power
less. Such is the case with the invention of
general algebra, with the differential calcu
lus, and in a more limited, region with Lagran-
ge ' s calculus of variations, with my calculus
of congruences, and with Mobius's calculus.
Such conceptions unite, as it were, into an
organic whole countless problems which other
wise would remain isolated and require for
their separate solution more or less applica
tion of inventive genius."
Gauss
0-9771170-1-4
PREFACE
111
Since this book is intended for a wide audience, includ
ing students, engineers, scientists, as well as mathematicians,
we have presented many details that would not appear in a
research report and we have excluded proofs. (Most of the re
sults can be proved in a straightforward way.) It is assumed,
of course, that the reader has a working knowledge of the
rudiments of classical calculus.
Jane Grossman
Michael Grossman
Robert Katz
PRELIMINARIES, 0
1.0 Introduction, 1
1.1 Arithmetic Average, 1
1.2 Linear Functions, 2
1.3 Classical Slope, 3
1.4 Classical Gradient, 4
1.5 Classical Derivative, 5
1.6 The Basic Theorem of Classical Calculus, 6
1.7 The Basic Problem of Classical Calculus, 7
1.8 Classical Integral, 8
1.9 The Fundamental Theorems of Classical Calculus, 10
2. Introduction, 11
2. u-Measure, 11
2. u-Average, 12
2. u-Uniform Functions, 16
2. u-Slope, 17
2. u-Gradient, 17
2. u-Derivative, 19
2. The Basic Theorem of u-Calculus, 21
2. The Basic Problem of u-Calculus, 23
2. u-Integral, 24
2.10 The Fundamental Theorems of u-Calculus, 27
2.ll An Unexpected Result, 29
3.0 Introduction, 30
3.1 u*-Measure, 31
3.2 u*-Average, 32
3.3 u*-Uniform Functions, 35
3.4 u*-Slope, 37
3.5 u*-Gradient, 37
3.6 u*-Derivative, 39
3.7 The Basic Theorem of u*-Calculus, 41
3.8 The Basic Problem of u*-Calculus, 43
3.9 w*~ Integral, 44
3.10 The Fundamental Theorems of u*-Calculus, 47
3.ll Relationship between u*-Calculus and Weighted
Classical Calculus, 48
3.12 An Alternative Approach to u*-Calculus, 49
3.13 Weighted Geometric Calculus, 49
LIST OF SYMBOLS, 52
INDEX, 5Z
PRELIMINARIES
Classical Calculus
1.0 INTRODUCTION
3. For any numbers r, s, t such that r < s < t and any func
tion f continuous on [r, t] ,
(s - r) • Mf + (t - s) • Mf = (t - r) • M
-L O L
has the same value on EVERY interval [r, s] . That fact sug
gests the definition of classical slope given next.
The operator G is
f(x) - f(a)
lim
x - a
f(x) - f(a)
x - a
f(x) - f(a)
The operator D is
Additive: D(f + g) = Df + Dg ,
Homogeneous : D(c • f) = c • Df , c any constant.
1.6 THE BASIC THEOREM OF CLASSICAL CALCULUS
For many years we have been guided by the idea that the
"kernel" of the classical calculus is a well-known result that
we call the Basic Theorem of Classical Calculus. Let us begin
with its discrete analogue, which is a proposition that con
cerns discrete functions and appropriately conveys the spirit
of the theorem.
a
G£ i_ i , r* n h
a i_
h +•••+«
a a
1 n-1 _
; = Grh '•
n-1
h(s) - h(r)
h(s) = h(r) + (s - r)
We set / f = 0 and f f = — f f .
Jr Js Jr
The operator / is
_-s /-s /.s
Additive : /"(f + g)= f f + f 9 ,
Jr JT Jr
rs
The following result provides a way of expressing / f
•'r
as the limit of a sequence of sums.
rs
If f is continuous on [r, s] , then / f equals the
Jt
limit of the convergent sequence whose nth term is
the sum
jn.f<ai) + ... t VfU^) ,
properties:
-s
g •
r
3. For any numbers r, s, t such that r < s < t and any func
-s
f = / f .
s •'r
10
then
Dg = f , on [r, s] .
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 u-MEASURE
ll
12
2.2 u-AVERAGE
v, + • • • + v
1 n
+ • • • + w (an)
Also, 14 f equals
-s
(f
r
s
DW
s
f
s - r
The operator M is
Additive: ^S (f + g) = ^Sf + MSg ,
3. For any numbers r, s, t such that r < s < t and any func
tion f continuous on [r, t] ,
and
m[a,, a~] = m[a-, a.,] = ••• = m[a ,, a ] .
u(an)-f(an)
+ • • • + w (an)
f(an)
2.4 u-SLOPE
2.5 u-GRADIENT
we have
f(s) - f(r)
W(s) - W(r)
which is the classical gradient of f RELATIVE to W on [r, s]
If u(x) = 1 on R, then
-s
u = s - r ,
r
and so
irf = Grf '
The operator g is
Additive; g^(f + g) = g^f + g^g ,
Homogeneous : g S (c*f) =c-Gf,
S
c any constant.
2.6 u-DERIVATIVE
f(x) - f(a)
w
a
Notice that if a < x, then
f(x) - f(a)
a
And if x < a, then
f(x) - f(a)
Jarx w
It can be proved that [gf] (a) and [Df] (a) coexist; that
is, if either exists then so does the other. Moreover, if they
do exist, then
f(x) - f(t)
[gf ] (t) = lim .
x^fc W(x) - (/(t)
f(s) - f(r)
[Df ] (c) = g^f = .
m[r, s]
21
NOTE
Then
v, (G h) + ••• + v__n ( G r h)
vn-l
h(s) - h(r)
m[r, s]
NOTE
Here is another discrete analogue of the Basic Theorem
of u-Calculus:
Let h be a discrete function whose arguments
a,, ..., a constitute a u-partition of [r, s]. Then
n - 1
2.9 u-INTEGRAL
m[r, s] • M^f .
We set / f = 0 .
If u(x) = 1 on R, then
The operator / is
rs
Additive: / (f + g) =
Homogeneous : / (c • f) = c • / f ,
£x ?r
c any constant.
25
fS
2. If f is continuous on [r, s] , then / f equals the limit
= r
of the convergent sequence whose nth term is the sum
k -f (a,) + ••• + k -f (a .) ,
- V(ai) for i = 1 , . . . , n - 1 , it is
three properties:
3. For any numbers r, s, t such that r < s < t and any func
tion f continuous on [r, t] ,
/"'*/*'-
= r =rs /*
^r
27
l£f = f(c) ;
NOTE
1 /-I
= h(l) - h(0) =5-2=3.
Jn
29
****************************************************************
3.0 INTRODUCTION
a-arithmetic B-arithmetic
Realm A B
Addition + +
Subtraction - -
Multiplication * x
Division / /or
30
31
3.1 u*-MEASURE
r
I
JT
3.2 u*-AVERAGE
*s
It turns out that ^ f equals
-
If (w x f)
Jr
Since
*
.. *
(f x D
/^
.*.s.
*e
*
X DW
*s
If w is constant on A, then M
"' f reduces to the
(unweighted) *-average M*s f .
*
The operator M is
B-Additive: g*{f + g) = MSf + g ,
*s •• •• *s
B-Homogeneous: M (c x f) = c * M f ,
c any constant in B.
and
[u(an) x f(an)]
B(n)
that is, u has the same B-change on all ex-intervals with the
same u*-measure. Therefore each function on A expressible in
the form [b * V(x}] + c , and only such a function, is called a
k;*-uniform function.
Notice, in particular, that each u*-uniform function has
the same B-change on all u*-unit intervals, if any.
Clearly every function that is constant on A is w*-
uniform (take b = 0) .
Moreover, if w is constant, then the u*-uniform func
tions are identical with the *-uniform functions.
In Section 3.5, we shall exploit the fact that there is
exactly one u*-uniform function containing any two given *-
points with distinct first coordinates.
It can easily be proved that if u is a u*-uniform func
tion, then the B-ratio
u(s) - u(r)
* t
m[r, s]4
has the same value on EVERY a-interval [r, s] . That fact sug
gests the definition of u*-slope given next.
37
3.4 u*-SLOPE
u(s) - u(r)
m['r, s]
3.5 u*-GRADIENT
rs .
m[r, s]
JrI 1}
If u is a u*-uniform function, then g u equals the u*
slope of u.
38
rs
Since / w = W(s) - W(r) ,
Jt
we have
*_ f(s) - f(r)
g'f =
*s
and so we may call grf "the *-gradient of f RELATIVE to W on
t'r, s] . "
If w(x) = 1 on A, then
rs
I w = i (s) - i (r) ,
•'r
*s • t
and so Q^f equals the *-gradient of f on [r, s] .
*
The operator Q is
B-Additive; |^(f + g) = g°f + Q^g ,
*s •• •• *s
B-Homogeneous; g (c*f) =cxgf,
c any constant in B.
3.6 u*-DERIVATIVE
f(x) - f(a)
*-lim
x-t-a
f(x) - f(a) t
sx
'a
And if x < a, then
f(x) - f(a) t
*..
= G*f
X
.
* *
It can be proved that [gf] (a) and [Df ] (a) coexist.
Moreover, if they do exist, then
*
The u*-derivative of
— - f, denoted by Df,
.- is the function
^
that assigns to each number t in A the number [Df ] (t) , if it
exists.
Since
/:
/ u = V(x) - V(t), we have
f/(x) - V(t)
[f(x) - f(a)]/f(a)
lim ,
(x - a)/a
Then
* 37
<V, x 5/ hi +•..+( v , x G* a n h)
-L -* a _ IT"' -L — a
1 n-l
vn-l
42
mfr, s]
NOTE
*a, .. .. *an
G h + ••• + G h
=a =3
B(n - 1)
h(s) - h(r)
* f
m[r, s]\
*• • •• s
The number m[r, s] x M f that appears in the preceding
solution will arise with sufficient frequency to warrant a spe
cial name, "the u*-integral of f on [r, sj," which is intro
duced in the next section.
3.9 u*-INTEGRAL
m[r, s] x £* f .
/*r
VJe set / f = 0 .
**
/•<-/ (u x f) ,
^ 3T r
Since
rs rs •• *
/ f = / (f x DV) ,
gx Jr
rs
we may call / f "the *-integral of f RELATIVE to W on
Jr
(r, s]."
If u(x) =1 on A, then
*S *E
L f =/r
45
*
The operator / is
*s *s 4s
B-Additive: / (f + g) = / f + / g,
Jr JTC sr
B-Homogeneous : / (c x f) = c x / f,
J J- J •£
c any constant in B.
B-sum
B-sum
[k x i(a ) ] + ••• + [k x f (a .)] ,
n I n n-1
M^f = f(c) ;
g (x) = r*
/ f , for every number x in [r, s] ,
Jr
then
* . .
Qg = f , on [r, s] .
(3) :« - •{&}
(4)
f /
=r r
f =
(In (2), the derivatives [Df ] (a) and [gf ] (a) coexist; in (3)
and (4), we assume f is *-continuous on ['r, sj.)
exp
i/; In
Ir (In w • In f)
J
exp
In u
exp In u) + c
f (s) 1/t
f (r)
where t In u .
51
D(ln f)
exp
In u
exp | / (In w - In f)
* c)
g(f * c ,
= (Df) c any constant .
Symbol Pag
D 5
D 19
*
D 39, 40
f1 0
6 4
g 17
*
G 37
m 11
*
m 32
H 1
g 12
M 32
R 0
w, V ll, 31
a, B, i 30
[r, s] 0
e, exp, In 0
+ , -, x, /', < 30
, < 30
* 30
8
/
/ 24
/ 44
52
INDEX
Additive, 2 Defined, 0
Arguments , 0 Discrete analogue, 6
Arithmetic average,! Discrete f unction, 0
relative, 1 3 Domain, 0
weighted ,1 2- 1 3, 33
Arithmetic partition, 0 Elasticity, 40
Exp,0
B-Additive,3<2
6-Homogeneous , 34 Function, 0
Fundamental Theorems :
Basic Problem: Classical Calculus, 10
Classical Calculus,? u-Calculus, 28
u-Calculus, 23 u*-Calculus, 4 7
u*-Calculus ,43
Basic Theorem: Homogeneous, 2
Classical Calculus, 6
u-Calculus,2J-22 Inner product, 24
Interior ,0
Interval, 0
Characterized , 2 Inverse,!?
Classical calculus, 1-10
Classical change, 0 Linear function, 2
Classical derivative, 5 Ln,0
relative, 20 Logarithmic derivative, 20
Classical extent, 0
Classical gradient, 4 Mean Value Theorem:
relative, 18 Cauchy's,22
Classical integral, 5 Classical Integrals, 27
relative , 25 u-Calculus,20, 27
weighted, 24 u*-CaIcuIus,41, 47
Classical slope, 3
Classical weight function, 11 n-Fold, 0,14,34
Coexist, 1 9 Number, 0
Coordinate , 0
53
54
u-Average,I2
u-Calculus, 11
u-Derivative,79
u-Gradient, 1 7
u-Integral, 24
u-Measure, 1 1
u-Partition, 14
u-Slope, 1 7
In the classical calculus the line is used as a stan
dard against which other curves are compared. In the
following remarks, Roger Joseph Boscovich (1711 - 1787)
may have been the only person to anticipate a fundamen
tal idea in non-Newtonian calculus: a nonlinear curve
may be used as a standard against which other curves
(including lines) can be compared.
'But if some mind very different from ours were to look upon some
property of some curved line as we do on the evenness of a straight
line, he would not recognize as such the evenness of a straight line;
nor would he arrange the elements of his geometry according to that
very different system, and would investigate quite other relationships
as I have suggested in my notes.
'We fashion our geometry on the properties of a straight line
because that seems to us to be the simplest of all. But really all lines
that are continuous and of a uniform nature are just as simple as
one another. Another kind of mind which might form an equally
clear mental perception of some property of any one of these curves,
as we do of the congruence of a straight line, might believe these
curves to be the simplest of all, and from that property of these
curves build up the elements of a very different geometry, referring
all other curves to that one, just as we compare them to a straight
line. Indeed, these minds, if they noticed and formed an extremely
clear perception of some property of, say, the parabola, would not
seek, as our geometers do, to rectify the parabola, they would endea
vour, if one may coin the expression, to parabolify the straight line.'