Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Chairman
Members
Officers
Page
No.
1. Chapter-1 : Overview 44
Annexure I
77
Annexure II
87
CHAPTER-1
OVERVIEW
Delhi is a City with several unique features. Unlike most other cities,
the centre of the City i.e. New Delhi which is sparsely populated has a
dense green cover and acts as the City‟s lung. The City has innumerable
heritage structures dotting the cityscape comparable only to cities like
Rome. The City is the seat of power for two Governments viz. the
Government of India as well as the Government of the National Capital
Territory of Delhi. Consequently, it has been the focus of attention of both
the Central and State Governments and their regulatory authorities
governing the City.
With the globalisation of the Indian Economy and being the venue
of two major International Games viz the Asian Games and the
Commonwealth Games, the City has been witnessing a very high influx of
population from different parts of the Country. In terms of the projection
of population indicated in the Master Plan for Delhi 2021, the population
for the city is expected to increase to 230 lakhs by the year 2021.
With the need for a holistic, balanced and inclusive growth of the
City, the Commission with the approval of the Government took up site
specific conceptual urban design studies which demonstrate the manner
in which three dimensional planning for different parts of the City could be
done. For undertaking the studies, the Commission created a Hub with all
modern amenities and engaged a very dedicated and talented team of
technically trained manpower for the purpose. The studies comprise of
site specific design for wards, gardens, development along metro
corridors. The reports of the completed studies have been sent to the
authorities for implementation with the expectation that similar studies
would be taken up by the authorities not only in Delhi but other cities of
the Country.
The Commission was conferred with the prestigious award for its
significant contribution in the field by Washroom and Beyond.
While the City Level Projects have been the main focus of the
Commission during the year, the Commission made valuable contribution
on the other proposals referred through the local bodies. The
Commission considers these proposals on the basis of its general
guidelines for individual buildings which have been given wide publicity.
In fact an undertaking is obtained from the project proponent/architect on
compliance of these guidelines. Once such an undertaking is received, the
consideration time of the Commission is minimal. After introduction of
these guidelines the Commission has been able to dispose of proposals in
the minimal time.
In terms of its mandate the Commission is required to meet at least
twice a month. The Commission held 25 number of meetings during the
year 2014-15 in which it considered a total of 184 complete proposals as
per details indicated below:
Abstract of Proposals
Considered(2014-15)
Approved
2% 11%
4% Observatio
ns Given
83% Returned &
Rejected
Under
Process
Within 2
6% weeks
10%
8% Within 3
weeks
50% Within 4
13%
weeks
13% Within 5
weeks
Within 6
weeks
More
than 6
Despite considerable time devoted on the major initiatives like
Unified Building Byelaws or Policy on Lutyen‟s Bunglow Zone etc., the
Commission has been ensuring that on an average about 7 to 10
proposals are considered in every meeting. Consequently, there have
hardly been any arrears of pendency at any point of time.
Phase I
1
1
.
S
M R
Before(left), and After ( Right) I
W
I
N
D G
E
R R
Transit Oriented O O
A
Development – D
A
D
Rajdhani Park to
Mundka
CR Park
2.
Rehabilitation of Slum/Un-authorized Colonies
(b) Slums
1) Mohammadpur slum (Ward No.67)
2) Sudhar Camp (Ward No.196)
A survey was done and the work plan was prepared to carry forward
the studies in terms of urban fabric, open space structure, transportation,
building typologies, services like drainage and water supply. Attempt has
been made to address the aforesaid issues and suggest viable solutions in
the recommendations of the studies.
3. Rejuvenation of Gardens
Phase II
6. Sunken 11
2. Cultural 3. Nursery + 15.
Court/ 13. 10. 12. Museum 8. Mixed use
Centre vehicular Communi
exhibition Neighborho Extension Communi complex development
road ty park 16.
space 1. Mixed use 5. od park and of ty park
Developmen Banquet Sunken 9. Sunken
4. Private Community existing with
t Hall court court /
Hospital Centre Primary basemen
flower vegetable
School t parking
market market
7. Bus
Stop
14. Bus
Stop
Lado Sarai- Adding urban in fills as social infrastructure and mixed use housing
5. Chandni Chowk and Kashmeri Gate (Ward Nos. Chandni Chowk 80,
Kashmiri Gate 77)
The selected areas have all the elements of organic growth (very
high density, narrow lanes, small plots, high ground coverage and
structures of about 3-4 floors height, mixed land use and a general
deficiency of infrastructure). The area is a representative example of the
rest of the unauthorized colonies in the City. Despite being an
unauthorized colony, the area is developing fast in violation of the Master
Plan. The issues that are being dealt with at this stage call for following
few interventions that can be explored for the area as upgradation of
services and motivating people to come together and pool in to be part of
better planning control for their area.
The City and its streets have been taken over by vehicles pushing
aside the right of the people to walk. Due to traffic loads the pedestrians
suffer frequent road fatalities. Delhi pedestrians constituted 455 of total
1,820 road accidents in 2013-14. (Delhi Traffic Police Statistics).
The project aims at making the city accessible, allow pedestrians/
cyclists the right to walk/access their city through exploring alternate
layers of the City. The study attempts this through developing existing
natural and man-made elements into network systems. The goal of
Movement Corridors was to create an interconnected zonal and local
system of paths and trails to make Delhi pedestrian friendly city through
green lungs (city greens) and movement corridors for non-motorized
vehicles. This would provide safe and convenient access between parks,
natural systems and recreational facilities connecting them with
residential areas, civic institutions and businesses.
Yamuna can act as a large public space in this megacity, where with
the very high densities in residential areas, slums, and unauthorised
colonies, there is a major dearth of open spaces. It can in turn reconnect
the city to the river not only metaphorically, but also physically and help
in the upkeep of the river.
Chapter-3
Significant Initiatives
Hi-tech Public Toilets
DUAC receiving award for its significant contribution in the field of sanitation by Washroom and Beyond
The Commission was conferred with the prestigious award for its
significant contribution in the field of sanitation by Washroom and
Beyond.
Prototypes being developed based on new designs
Some of the salient features of the proposed UBBL for Delhi 2015
are as follows:
An Imperial New Delhi Plan was made by Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens, a
British Architect in the year 1912 for the national capital and the same
was implemented and inaugurated in the year 1932. With rapid
urbanization after Independence, the need for conservation of the central
part of Delhi started assuming significance. With a view to conserve the
unique character of Imperial Delhi the Government in the year 1988
brought out guidelines to regulate the construction activity of this area
which was termed as Lutyen‟s Bunglow Zone (LBZ). The boundary of the
LBZ was also defined which has undergone change in the year 2003.
The Delhi Urban Art Commission is one of its kind of body which has
been playing a vital role in the development of the city of Delhi for the
last over four decades.
Staff Position
Finance
Right to Information
DUAC Secretariat
S. No Name/Designation
1. Vinod Kumar, Secretary
2. Rajeev Kumar Gaur, Asst. Secy. (Tech.)
3. Raghvendra Singh, A.O.
4. V.K. Tyagi, Private Secretary
5. Uma Bhati, Architectural Assistant
6. Nishi Sachdeva, Architectural Assistant
7. Manju Anjali, Architectural Assistant
8. Sidharth Sagar, Architectural Assistant
9. Alka Dhir, Sr. Stenographer
10. Kalpana Dewani, Hindi Translator
11. Gopal Singh, Assistant
12. Indu Rawat, Sr. Stenographer
13. Ravinder Kumar, Jr. Stenographer
14. Renu Bassi, UDC
15. Rajbir Singh, Hindi Typist
16. Sunita Rani, LDC
17. Deepak Chandra Bandooni, LDC
18. S.K. Singh, Daftry
19. Panna Lal, Peon
20. Sri Ram, Peon
21. Daya Ram, Peon
22. Shiksha Devi, Peon
23. Manoj Kumar, Chowkidar
Acknowledgement