Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-Rector

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Final exam – To research
and propose a project.

1. General Description of the Course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación

Academic Unit
Academic Level Professional

Academic Field Disciplinary

Course Name Pedagogical Experience I

Course Code 551024
Course Type Practical Retake Yes ☐ No ☒
(Methodological) Exam
Number of Credits 3

2. Description of the Activity

Indi
Number of
Type of Activity: vidu ☒ Collaborative ☐ 2
Weeks
al
Initi
Evaluation al
☐ Intermediate ☐ Final ☒
Moment: Unit
1
Environment to Submit the
Total Score of the Activity:
Activity: Monitoring and Evaluation
125
Environment
Starting Date of the Deadline of the Activity:
Activity:
09 May 2020 22 May 2020
Competences to Develop:
The student is able to identify research problems in the classroom and
propose realistic and transforming solutions.
Topics to Develop:
Critical thinking, researching techniques, pedagogical strengths and
weaknesses
Steps, Phase or Stage of the Learning Strategy to Develop
Final evaluation.
Activities to Develop
You need to go to the contents of the course Unit 3:

Bell, J., & Waters, S. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for
First-Time Researchers (Vol. 6th ed). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill
Education. Recovered from: http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?
url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=937946&lang=es&site=eds-
live&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-3

Loughran, J. J. (1999). Researching Teaching: Methodologies and

Practices for Understanding Pedagogy. London: Routledge. Recovered
from: http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/login?
url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=83004&lang=es&site=eds-
live&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_iii

Read as much as you can and with the authors guidance and the
experience you have had in the classroom; propose a research project
for the institution that was the scenario of your practices in the
following template:

Name pf the student:

Project Proposal: [Name of Project]
Background

• Capture the essence of the project by briefly stating (about 300

words):
• What the current context or situation is?
• What do you feel would be a way of addressing the problem(s)
using your expertise?
• Why is this a good way to go?
• What impact will be achieved, what would be the outcome?
• Who the main beneficiaries will be, what is the gain?

Objectives
 [specific & measurable objective 1]
 [specific & measurable objective 2]
 [specific & measurable objective 3]

Proposal

 Specific/relevant opportunities and/or problems – explain how

you identified the problem or opportunity of particular concern
to you
 Theoretical framework. Mention at least three authors that
help you to orientate the proposal, explain their theories and
the connection with your topic (about 300 words).
 Potential Impact – discuss what the potential impact of the
project would be.

Timeframe

Description of Work Start and

End Dates
Phase … …
One
Phase … …
Two
Phase … …
Three

Monitoring and Evaluation

[Describe how progress will be evaluated throughout and at the end

of the project. Formulate clear indicators for objectives and result.]

References:
Final part: Collect the formats, 3, 4, 5, and 8 and upload them with
the project proposal. Look at the top of the format who must fill it.
The formats 5 and 8 must be filled by your tutor. All formats must
be complete and signed. The Score: 15 points.

Environments for
Knowledge environment
the Development
Monitoring and Evaluation Environment
of the Activity
Individual:

A zip file with:

- The research project template in a PDF

form.
- The filled and signed formats 3, 4, 5,
Products to be and 8.
Submitted by
Students
Supporting teacher:
Your supporting teacher will assess you up to 30
points, according to your assistance to the skype
meetings.

3. General Guidelines for the Collaborative Work

Planning of Collaborative learning is a strategy that allows

Activities for the students to work together in order to achieve a
Development of common goal. Accordingly, the collaborative
Collaborative work proposed for the course is based on a
Work structured and planned process that includes
individual and group activities, as well as
interaction and socialization in the virtual
classroom.
1. Explore the syllabus of the course.
 2. Make several readings of the activity guide
and the evaluation rubric for each of the units of
individual and collaborative work.
3. All the activities that are carried out for the
development of the activity should be reflected
within the course through the different media
and especially in the forum of each activity,
since the interaction; if they work by Skype or
other means they should evidence it in the
forum with screenshots.
4. Be in constant communication with the
colleagues and tutor during the development of
activities.
5. In case of any concern, ask the tutor or the
colleagues with time, using the various
communication channels arranged in the course.
6. Enter the contributions with time for the
Timely feedback from peers and tutor.
7. Establish a schedule of activities within each
forum and a table of roles and functions for
meet during the development of each activity.
Roles to Be Different roles are proposed within the
Performed by the collaborative environment, which allow an
Student in the appropriate space for academic growth and
Collaborative effective interaction that promotes learning and
Group interpersonal relationships. Every student will
take up one of these roles for the development
of the course assignments and can only be
changed if decided by the group members.
Facilitator: Makes sure that every voice is
heard and focuses work around the learning
task. Provides leadership and direction for the
group and suggests solutions to team problems.
Recorder: Keeps a public record of the team's
ideas and progress. Checks to be sure that ideas
are clear and accurate.
Time keeper: Encourages the group to stay on
task. Announces when time is halfway through
and when time is nearly up.
Planner: States an action for the completion of
 the task at hand according to the instructions
and course agenda.
Task monitor: Looks for supplies or requests
help from the teacher when group members
agree that they do not have the resources to
solve the problem.
Compiler: Puts together the final product and
includes the work done only by those who
participated on time. Informs the student in
charge of alerts about people who did not
participate and will not be included in the final
product.
Reviser/Editor: Makes sure the written work
follows all the criteria established in the activity
guide.
Roles and Duties
Evaluator: Evaluates the final document to
for the
ensure it follows the evaluation criteria of the
Submission of
rubric and informs the student in charge of
Products by
alerts about any changes that need to be made
Students
before delivering the product.
Deliveries: Student in charge of informing
about the dates set for presenting each task and
delivering the final product according to the
course agenda. Also informs other students that
the final product has been sent.
Alerts: Informs group participants about any
news in the work being done and reports the
delivery of the final product to the course tutor.
All references considered for this activity have to
References
be cited using APA Style
Plagiarism Policy Students must be aware of the risks and
penalties in case of plagiarism.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the

actions that infringe the academic order, among
others, are the following: paragraph e)
"Plagiarism is to present as your own work all or
part of a written report, task or document of
invention carried out by another person. It also
implies the use of citations or lack of references,
 or it includes citations where there is no match
between these and the reference" and
paragraph f) " To reproduce, or copy for profit,
educational resources or results of research
products, which have rights reserved for the
University ". (Acuerdo 029 - 13 De Diciembre de
2013, Artículo 99)

The academic penalties that the student will face

are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in

the academic work or evaluation, the score
obtained will be zero (0.0) without any
disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic
work of any nature, the score obtained will be
zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures
being derived.

To learn how to properly cite all your tasks, see

the following:
BibMe. (n.d.). APA Citation Guide. Retrieved
from http://www.bibme.org/citation-guide/apa/

4. Evaluation Rubric
Evaluation Rubric
Task 5 – Final exam
Activity Collaborative
Individual Activity ☒ ☐
Type: Activity
Evaluation Intermediate
Initial ☐ ☐ Final ☒
Moment Unit 3
Evaluated Performance Levels of the Individual Activity
Score
Items High Score Average Score Low Score
Research The student The student did The student did 80 points
Proposal included the not include all the not upload the
template suggested suggested aspects research
aspects with dep some proposal.
and appropriate descriptions are
descriptions. shallow and
 inaccurate.
(up to 70 (up to 35
(up to 0 points)
points) points)
The students
uploaded all the The students did The student did
formats not upload all the not upload any
Formats 3,
complete and formats required. format. 15 points
4, 5 y 8
signed.
(up to 15
(up to 7 points) (up to 0 points)
points)
The student
The student The student hasn
has been
Hasn´t been ´t
attending
attending often attended to the
to the meetings
Meetings to the meetings the meetings by
by skype with
with the by skype with the skype with the 30 points
the tutor
tutor. tutor assigned by tutor assigned by
assigned by the
the UNAD the UNAD
UNAD
(up to 30 (up to 15
(up to 0 points)
points) points)
Final Score 125