Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Each of the five Interview scenarios on the NIC Interview and Performance exam is rated on three domains.

The domains are rated on a scale of one to four, with four being the highest.
Below is a chart of the domains and the ratings that correspond to the candidate’s response.

NIC Interview Examination Rubric Anchors


Rating I Rating II Rating III Rating IV
Exhibits integrity, confidence,
Exhibits superficial and one- Exhibits a thoughtful and positive
Exhibits a rigid or incorrect analysis critical thinking, and focus in
Overarching description dimensional analysis of the approach to the problem(s) and
of the problem(s) and/or solution(s). analysis of the problem(s) and
problem(s) and/or solution(s). solution(s).
solution(s).

The candidate’s response will


The candidate’s response will
The candidate’s response might identify and sufficiently describe the
The candidate’s response might lack describe clearly and
identify the problem or conflict problem or conflict between the
identification of problem or conflict comprehensively the problem or
between the situation and the situation and the interpreter code of
between the situation and the conflict between the situation and
interpreter code of ethics, policies, ethics, policies, procedures, and/or
interpreter code of ethics, policies, the interpreter code of ethics,
Domain #1 procedures, and/or laws as laws, as applicable.
procedures, and/or laws, as policies, procedures, and/or laws, as
Identification of problem or applicable.
applicable. applicable.
conflict The candidate’s response will
The candidate’s response might provide a sufficient discussion of at
The candidate’s response might The candidate’s response will
provide a discussion of a single least two perspectives including, if
provide insufficient discussion of a provide a substantial discussion of
perspective with minimal expansion. applicable, the D/deaf consumer’s
single perspective. perspectives of involved parties.
perspective.

The candidate’s response might The candidate’s response might The candidate’s response will
The candidate’s response will
contain a single perspective (e.g., contain a single perspective (e.g., contain sufficient discussion of at
provide a substantial discussion of
D/deaf or hearing consumer, D/deaf or hearing consumer, least two perspectives including, if
perspectives of involved parties.
interpreter, system). interpreter, system) with minimal applicable, the D/deaf consumer’s
Domain #2 expansion. perspective.
The candidate’s response will
Construction of a decision or The candidate’s response might lack
present a successful solution(s)
solution a reasonable solution. The candidate’s response might The candidate’s response will
using, as applicable, (1) reasoning as
present an ineffective solution, or present an effective solution(s) to
influenced by past and present
The candidate’s response might present an effective solution with no the problem with sufficient
practices and (2) resources.
contain a solution that is incorrect, explanation. explanation.
inflexible, and/or irrelevant.
The candidate’s response will
Domain#3 The candidate’s response might lack The candidate’s response might The candidate’s response will contain sufficient discussion of both
Consequences of a decision or discussion of the potential contain minimal discussion of contain sufficient discussion of the the short-term and long-term effects
solution consequences. potential consequences. short-term effects. that might include cultural, political,
and/or sociological implications.