Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
REFORMER, ICONOCLAST.
REFORMER. ICONOCLAST, MORALIST
1977
',~.:, -':
,'.1....
., :=: .,....
:=;. .,....
',-
., ::..~
..u'-
.: ....... ,'
0; ,'
~'."
~ " ..
Justice "Kirby
Mr. Justice'Kirby
Chairman <;>f :the Australian .La~.. _R~,fo.rm
,Re,fo.rm CQl1lJI!i,ssion
CQIIlJI!i,ssion
BARBAROUS RELICS
Last we'ek'the
we"ek'the HasteI' of the Rolls, Lqrd"
Lqrd' "Denning.,
'Denning_,
struck again. Appeal in London held -that in
The' Court of Appe;l
unmarried woman.
certain circumstances an unm'arried woman, has' the ~ight
-right to oust
ous.t
her love·r from her home where"he is violent and even if he has
,PFoperty'rights
_p,!,operty'rights in the- home'. Reversing by. maj,o~ity earlier
~ecisions,
~ecisions, .the ;court held that modern ~conditions
_the ,cou'rt -_conditions of social
j~ustice
j;ustice require that pel""sonal l:'.ights sho-uld .,take
personal I'.ights _,take priority over
pr?~erty rights.
pr?~erty The case is to go to the the' House _of
_of. Lords.
Perhaps the decision will be reversed. But for the moment, it
stands as the latest monurrient of a·~man
a·~man who has' been described
~s "England,'
as most- revoJ.,utionary j.~dgelf,:
"England,t s most j.~dge!f·:
by the
Fifteen years ago, undeterred hy the' centuries-old
doctrine that the domicile of a wife was always deemed to be
that of her husbanq, Lord Denning castigated this principle as
lithe last bar.barous relic of a wife's servitude nfl •• No doubt
this attack contributed to the modification of this rule both in
England and Australia. Readers who knew npthing mor.e would
simply say that this was a judge determined to strike a blow
for "women's rights". But Lord Denning, a self-confessed
iconocla;.st,
iconocl~st, has, in thirty three .years
-years on the.
the, Bench, established
~imself as a major judicial force
~imself farce for law reform. His decisions
had'an
have, had' an impact on Australian law. One English Law Lord,
writing in The Times in January suggested that ou~ time .would
,would
be seen by legal history as lithe age of law reform, legal aid
and 'Lord Denning".
- 2 ~
These cases
ca'ses disturbed
distur_bed ,Denning. 'He later described
describ.ed
the binding principles .as -as "f.alse ido1s,
id01s, :Ylhich.:dis:figured
'Ylhich _dis:figured t·he
t-he
temple of_ ·the.
·the_ law II • ,He
l l _He w'as:t6
was t6 come to a 'position':wher_e
-position- ,wher_e he could
do something about i t_.. t_ ..
The originaI'
originar" genius of the" corrurt~n' law was "the"capacity
the, corrurt~m" 'the"capacity
to adapt rules to 'me~t
me~t differing social"
social 'conditions.
condit'ions. The
'advent of the "'represen'ta
"advent -has" tended ,to
tive 'Parliament 'has-"
'''represen'ta tive'Parll"ament 'to
make' judges, inclu,ding
make" judges; inclu_ding appeal judges, reticent about inve'nting inve-nting
new principles of law or' ove~flirnirtg"decisions i:h'at.ha:ve
or" ove;flirning'decisions ihat"h~ve stood
ot'~tiJj~~"'iw~'~d;;
test'"ot"~tiJj~~
the test mak~ ·het;es~i"
",iW~ "~d;; rtot iIlaR~ 'heJ:;es~r more"'attractive'
mOre'"' attractive"
i~~' dignified 'by~:;"the;;~'i~~"\
because it i~~" 'by-:;"th~;;~'i~~"\ of ;refor~flt' ;;~::d:~cl~r;ed:
of'reforrn ~:;~I~ci~r"ed~
. _, -. ..,.-,;.- •..., .. ~ t "_"1'-. " - .
vis~o~J~c'siril';;hd'§':"~6rie;; tif Lord Denning I's"
~ ~
bef<?re,
bef~re, never' get anywhere.
we shall never The
law w~ll
w~ll stand still while the rest of
w~rld gpes on; and that will be bad
the we,rId
for both"-.
Another aspect' of the original common law system was
con.stan~t law refoi'm .: j
constan.t udg~s and lawyers working together to
mould pr;i.nciples'to fit nove·l circumstances.. Such -inventiveness
is -TIG>t_ n0w"s~ commo~. For exampl-e,
Fe; e.xamPl-e, i~ i937.
i~. i937 _our High Court ha~d
an oppprtunity
op-pprtunity to create a remedy in privacy : developing a
g~neral princi:ple so that a :c.:i,.
-c.:i,. tizen cl.aiming c-a wrongful
invasion of his .privacy could sue f6.r ~amag,e~.
fo.r ~amag,e~. Th~_ court
The
holdi~g that IThowever_
declined t,o do so holdi~g Ithowever_ desirable some limitation
~u'thorit'y ~las cited
upon invasions of privacy might be, no ~u'thorit'y
.w.hie.h· shows
.w.hie,h· ,that any general ri~ht
:that ri~ht of privacy exists". Such
,an argument of precedent WOUld. not have appealed to Denning.
would,not
The- failure
fZlilure develop a general
to develop, ri_ght. of privacy is the
gene:-ral ri.ght.
reason that c~mffiission has been asked in
the Law Reform Commission
Austr.a1i.:;.;.. !.?
Aust~ali.:;..;.. !.~ .do w~~.t__ ".~~e·'
!,.~~e·' cour~_~~,Qpte(f
cour~_~~,QPte(f I?ot tc? do.
not tt?
De~~ing~ ~. i~ England~'
De~~ing~ England~' 'has.. dis~layed no S1..!-Ch reticence. He was
';,
de~d hand
his case decided by the de?-d hand" of the past. I decline to
such- a; sterl:1e role so I--'hold
re-duce the judges t6 'Such-'a; r--'hold here that
there clearly to be implied sorne~~uch
is clea"rTy sorneo:;"sllch term 'as the Law
recomme'nds I I .
Corruni-ssion recomme'nds".
':".
':".'
~.9wer tie.r""in~ludi~g
-f9r- each ~.9wer
·fpr· tie.r""in~ludi~g the Court of ~ppeal,.
~ppeal,. to..
to._.a,ccept
}3,Ccept
. ,.;tJ:le_ ..de<;!i.~,i.<?;n_~:<..o~f. .:~r~.:,,;RJgP:~r:.
:loya:J-ly',.;tJ:le_,.de~i.~,i.9.;n~:,
loya:J-ly .,th~.:",p.~gP:~r:- :t:j,.~r:5".
:t:j,.~r:5.t II " .By.t.
1\ " . it is not
1y"..D~nI:1ing.'
c;:m 1y·
<;:m j_W;li~~?:~·.:;_~~5i.:-_ ~9,tt.r..'-:E.gr:.~)~~V~5.i.ye;...~?-~.gal cr i tic
D_~ nJ:1 in g.' 5 _j_W;li~~?:6·.:;_~~5i.:--~Stt.r..'-./25?,r:.§)~~v~1.~,ye;~~,~2-~.gal tics5
v:~et?s "_. So.me..
. whb ,express astonishment at hi!?_. v:~e't?s,,_, SO,me .. brli,eve th:at
tIl:at
Denning is excessively teleological in his approach.. He is
thinkin~
charged with thinking. o~. the.
o~.the. result he wants before he considers
rea~oni~g. ?ri..
t~~ legal rea~oni9g. ~h~ch. :i,.
?ri._ Wh~ch. J:a.~.- to be fO~I)d~9.
j,. t I:a.~:_ fO~I)ded. This
proc~ss is all V~I:'Y;,~el.l.,
pr()c~ssis V~t:'y;,~e1.l.., l:f- th,.er~ _)..~
lX _th,.er~ )_~ ..,ag1?e~mt:[1,t
,ag1?e~mt:[1.t _·o:n,.the~·
_·0!l .. the~· .
first -pri1].cipJ-~s that:
-pri1].cipJ;~s tha1;: are gui,dft.n~.J1~~.~:.:_:.B}.~t_ .... S~9Uld
gui,?j.n~.)1~~,~:.:_~B}.~t_ s~ould.. judge,_,
a. judge,_.
f1ear-·'. to the a-p~x_,
f1ear !P--~ .. legal~
a-p~x.. of .. ;P--~ o.:r..
legal~. sys.tern., ~b~.~ .. to
sYE.tern., :.. b~. <3.-b~.~ v~nt
.. g.iye v~nt
to,:g.iye
to his personal.
personal
".. val ue,.?ys.t~m,
value,_?ys,t~m, thereby: disr.upting
therebydisr,upting ~e:ttled
~e:ttled principle
principlE
- . . " - ... ...".. --",.
,.' ".--
' .'. . " .-. ",'. ,"
"., .'',
, .", '., .
. and creating'
''.',
.'.
con-fusion
con·fusion
.".' • •---. •.,....
.•• , ' -."
_."
.and
;-
:_ . '
uncer.ta-inty;,.in,
.anduncer.ta·inty;,.in,
, ;-"'..
:"..
' ':.
: •.,,'.'-, :--:', .'
," '_:-:, • ,-"''".
,""'.: ,:;; •.
the·. law?
Co ;':.:.'~.
."".,;'::;.'~. . -
_
he :took
:took, pa:rt
pa;rt t,:..he 9-ecision
in t.:.,he 9.ecision by ..which. .. the,.
..which Court .-of "App.eal
-. . .. " . - - ..•_
--. .
._
, " "..
- --:..'"
" ' .' . ..
'".-":"~~'E',~~: . " ,"
r'c :--~'~ ~. .
granted an.
granted ~nj UI"l;9.ti.9~.;,p?.:;:.:tJ~e ,aJ'P_li,?aB~:l!1;_:5?;
an_ ~njuI1;9.ti(?~.;,B?~;:.:t:he ,aJ'P_li,?aB~:l!"l:_:5?,; '~",;,'~'
'~:"., '~'..:."...:' . "
priva~e
pri vaie
.,,'.
.'.
citi:.:£en.,·direct~d.,a:t
citi.fen.
","-"
,·di'rect~d.
..,.--" - .•
-""".~'
,at'
... .. ..........
-'''~''.'~''',..,--,_.
a .uni.on.·.which·,
a.uni,on.
...--.,,,.".
---.,-".~.~
---~".-.~.
'.which:,
,-.""'~""',,.-~"
~." ""'.
"contrary_
__contrary_to
" ,. '" ,,·,"......c,·,...
"":'.
."C"_"--.""",,Cf~~·-·'·''.~
to law,.•
- '"..__ ., ,-'
'''''_'''"''''''''',,;'';~~'_"'' ''-'~ "C";'.,"",';.~·,
.,.~,~ •. , .. .., ," ._
. life of
an influence on the .life We.li':.~, . in
~e law. We.li'(.~: a time of .change :
and people expect judge~
judge~ c0~11enges Qf
_meet the ct'la.llenges
to .meet 0.£ change.
Leaving every. pefoI?fLl._~o
every.pefoI?fLl._~o P-~r:'liament. will. simp-ly Do"t.
P-~r:'liament.will.sirnp_ly no"t. .•·.
do .•'. Denning
.reminds us -of the origiJ:lal
origil:lal genius of the comrron law: adapting the law's
reasonable predictability and certainty to new times.
Revol~tionary judgeo~
Revol~tionary judge o~ maverick? Iconoclast or
~~ral~s~?_
harsh J1!.0.rali.st} O~}2': thing ~s certain,
_ O~~:thing Lo~d D:enning
c.e,rtain, Lor:d. ~enning is a towering
figure of the common la,w l~w whose passion for justice and reform has
lessons for u~-all.
u~-all. . ..... .. :
. ......
".