Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Available online
online at
at www.sciencedirect.com
www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
Availableonline
Available onlineatatwww.sciencedirect.com
www.sciencedirect.com
Energy
Energy Procedia
Procedia 00
00 (2017)
(2017) 000–000
000–000
ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
Energy
EnergyProcedia 142
Procedia 00(2017)
(2017)2773–2778
000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
9th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE2017, 21-24 August 2017, Cardiff, UK
the global warming and the acid rain (Chapter one [2]). Therefore, energy production planning based on RE sources
will reduce the mentioned problems of fossil fuel-based energy production. Estimation of the energy demand provides
a good vision for energy production planning.
2. Literature review
According to the world energy statistics, the total primary energy supply in terms of both Renewable Energy (RE) and
Non-Renewable Energy (NRE) for the year 2014 are 14.1% and 85.9 %, respectively [3]. Yet, the proportion of NRE
resources consist oil (31.3%), coal family (28.6%), natural gas (21.2%) natural gas, and Nuclear (4.8%). The excessive
use of NRE resources, on the one hand, speeds up the depletion of associated resources. One the other hand, the NRE
resources have negative impact on the environment, and global greenhouse gas emissions.
Econometrics approaches [4], [5], [6] are a popular method for the load forecasting, which provides a suitable vision
for the energy use. Diffusion and substitution models are other forecasting approaches which focus on the growth rate
of the market and technology change to estimate the product demand [7], [8].
Substitution Models: Simple technological changing model was proposed by Fisher [9] in which technological
substitution was defined in terms of proportional of the new technology to the old one. This model then was
generalized by Sharif and Kabir [10] in which two concepts were added to the model. The delay coefficient and the
delay factor were two adjustable factors to moderate the forecasting model from optimistic to pessimistic state. A
statistical model was developed by Meade [11] to model technological substitution process. This model was utilized
from the latest known observation to update itself. Kalman filter technique was used to estimate the parameters of the
model.
Diffusion Models: Growth pattern of five RE technologies was investigated by Hun and Lee [12]. Price function and
a diffusion model were suggested in this study to reduce the uncertainty of RE technologies as well as improve the
accuracy of the load forecasting. The usage of RE technologies to generate electricity was modelled by Meade and
Islam [13]. The trajectory of the fossil fuel price for the future, export/import security for fossil fuels, and
environmental impact were conducted as stimuli for the development of RE technologies. According to their study,
the growth rate of these technologies was classified into four groups among fourteen European countries. Moreover,
they found that variation in the fossil fuel price did not explain variation in the RE technology usage. Several
innovation in RE technologies, energy efficiency, and incentive schemes were introduced by Kumar and Agarwala
[14] to increase the diffusion rate for the RE technologies in India. An integrated approach was proposed for the RE
technology diffusion, which contained technology components, conversion, availability of resources, cost, and policy.
Lack of investment in RE technologies was recognized as a great barrier to diffuse RE technologies.
3. Methodology
This research specifies a framework to analyse the growth rate of renewable energy in comparison with Non-
renewable energy consumption. To conduct the mentioned analysis, here, a statistical model is proposed to forecast
the future situation of the renewable energy consumption (As a result renewable energy technologies). This paper
applies the Bayesian inference (Chapter three [15]) to estimate the sequence of renewable energy growth rate for each
year. Moreover, random number is used to generate some data for each year and to adjust the posterior distribution in
the Bayesian inference.
This study addresses Multi-Input Single Output (MISO) market in which different sources of renewable energy as
well as Non-renewable energy are applied to generate electricity in the market. Moreover, depletion of fossil fuel
resources along with uncertainty in the current condition of renewable energy sources (wind, shortage of water, sun,
and climate change) bring about incomplete substitution in the renewable energy market. In the case of energy, the
total amount of demand energy is fulfilled by both renewable and non-renewable energy. The existence uncertainty
in the electricity generation by renewable energy changes the priority to the fossil fuel types. On the other hand,
depletion of fossil fuel sources and their impacts, especially on climate changes and greenhouse gas emissions, has
provided opportunity to utilize the capacity of renewable energy as much as possible (Maximum level of energy
Reza Nadimi et al. / Energy Procedia 142 (2017) 2773–2778 2775
Author name / Energy Procedia 00 (2017) 000–000 3
generation by renewable energy sources at time ith, Ɵi). Therefore, the ideal form of substitution model (Fig. 1) at the
MISO energy market has been transformed into the complementary model (Fig. 2).
According to the Fig. 3, current energy data are used to forecast the total energy consumption level by means of
econometrics method (Ŷt) (First-Order Exponential Smoothing Model (FOESM), chapter four of [16]).
𝑌𝑌̂0 = 𝑥𝑥0 ( 1)
To estimate the percentage of RE usage at time tn or the position of Ɵ ̂ n, the Bayesian inference as well as random
number generation [17] are applied. Indeed, this paper supposes the Beta distribution (Beta (α, β)) as a prior
distribution to the Ɵn, which its range changes from zero to 100 percent (Zero to one). Moreover, this article assumes
RE projects are divided into the medium term projects with the length of 5 years. This assumption is used to estimate
the shape, α, and scale, β, parameters of the Beta distribution, at starting point. In other words, the shape and scale
parameters are identified based on previous RE usage data as follows:
𝛼𝛼 ∑𝑛𝑛−1
𝑖𝑖=𝑛𝑛−5 𝜃𝜃𝑖𝑖
𝐸𝐸(𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝑎𝑎 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷) = = 𝜃𝜃𝑛𝑛 = ( 3)
𝛼𝛼 + 𝛽𝛽 5
𝛼𝛼𝛼𝛼 ∑𝑛𝑛−1
𝑖𝑖=𝑛𝑛−5(𝜃𝜃𝑖𝑖 − 𝜃𝜃𝑛𝑛 )
2
𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉(𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷) = = 𝑆𝑆𝜃𝜃2𝑛𝑛 = ( 4)
(𝛼𝛼 + 𝛽𝛽)2 (𝛼𝛼 + 𝛽𝛽 + 1) (5 − 1)
Where E(…) and Var(…) stand for expected value and variance of the Beta distribution. On the other hand, random
number is implemented to shed light on possible usage of the RE sources through producing random data as current
information (likelihood function). Both information, the prior distribution and the likelihood function information are
applied to produce new information about RE consumption at future state, tn. From geometrical viewpoint (Fig. 2),
updating information leads the plausible next destination, Ɵn, to be changed to the expected value Ɵ ̂ n (here it is called
a forecasted value). However, this iterative proposed model is implemented for the total period of forecasting years.
2776 Reza Nadimi et al. / Energy Procedia 142 (2017) 2773–2778
4 Author name / Energy Procedia 00 (2017) 000–000
Energy
Data
Total energy
consumption
forecasting
Prior Beta
Distribution
Renewable Number of
Energy Random Number forecasting
year
Updating Bayesian
Inference (Posterior
Distribution)
Renewable Energy
Growth Rate
Analysis
Fig. 3: Conceptual framework of the renewable energy diffusion
3.2 Data
Total energy consumption and RE data of the Japan were collected for 25 years (1990 till 2014) from the IEA website
[18]. Generally, the RE data were included two parts: gross electricity generation (GWh) and gross heat production
(TJ). The RE sources in this research included municipal waste, industrial waste, primary solid biofuels, biogases,
liquid biofuels, geothermal, solar thermal, hydro, solar PV, wind, and tide &wave &ocean. In addition, 30 random
numbers were generated for each year to estimate the likelihood function’s parameters. The first twenty year’s data
were used for the forecasting, while the last five year’s data were kept for the verification of the proposed model. The
Average Absolute Error Percentage (AAEP) was then calculated to measure the error between the proposed and real
data by the following formula:
N i ˆi
AAEP
100
N 1
i
( 5)
According to the formula (2), total energy consumption was forecasted which its results are as follows:
Where the time index is equal to 1, 2,…,n. Therefore, the last five years data (2005 to 2009 years) were employed to
estimate the parameters of the prior distribution for the year 2010 (posterior distribution, here). Therefore, the last five
years data were used to obtain the expected value and the variance of the prior Beta distribution. After that, 30 random
numbers were generated through the obtained Beta distribution parameters. These 30 random number adjusted the
posterior distribution parameters (due to uncertainty in the forecasting of the RE sources). These steps were
implemented for the last five years (2010-2014) to achieve the proportion of the RE sources in the energy mix of the
Japan. Table 1 shows the results of the proposed model for the last five years to verify the proposed model.
Reza Nadimi et al. / Energy Procedia 142 (2017) 2773–2778 2777
Author name / Energy Procedia 00 (2017) 000–000 5
Table 1: Calculation of the proposed model for the last five years
Year (α, β) Prior (α, β) Posterior %RE Usage (Ktoe) Real %RE Usage (Ktoe)
Data ̂ n (Mean)
Forecasted or Ɵ
2010 (1.52, 51.71) (1.71, 46.65)
3.66 % (11292.32) 3.18 % (9838.97)
2011 (1.71, 46.65) (1.97, 51.17)
3.84 % (11608.77) 3.29 % (9940.90)
2012 (1.97, 51.17) (2.65, 60.25)
3.70 % (11158.47) 3.30 % (9934.20)
2013 (2.65, 60.25)
(2.69, 62.59) 3.97 % (12008.42) 3.32 % (10045.19)
2014 (2.69, 62.59)
(3.30, 92.18) 4.50 % (13292.00) 3.45 % (10197.46)
Verification of the proposed model based on the AAEP was carried out for the year 2010 to 2014. The value of AAEP
for the proposed model was 0.1557%, while for the FOESM approach the same criterion was 0.3648%. This article
defined four scenarios for the posterior distribution in terms of its mean and variance to consider the results of other
alternatives in the energy mix as well as the existence uncertainty.
According to the Fig. 4, renewable energy usage until 2030 was considered based on four scenarios in which the
average of the posterior distribution and its standard deviation (Sigma) were used to consider the each scenario.
Although, the estimation of the RE usage in terms of average has slightly growth, but it has a dramatic growth rate in
the presence of the standard deviation factor. For instance, forecasting energy consumption for the RE source with all
scenarios demonstrate a shock in the year 2028, but after the year 2029, the RE usage increases again. The AAEP
values for three status were as: AAEP (Mean+1*Sigma) = 0.0104, AAEP (Mean+2*Sigma) = 0.0464, and AAEP
(Mean+3*Sigma) = 0.0266.
40
RE Consumption Percentage
Mean
Mean+1*Sigma
Mean+2*Sigma
30 Mean+3*Sigma
20
10
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Year
Fig. 4: Percentage of RE consumption to total energy consumption
5. Conclusion
This study proposed a substitution model for the renewable energy consumption based on Bayesian inference and
random number generation. At first, the total energy consumption was estimated in terms of the last five years data
and then, the proportion of RE usage to total energy consumption was calculated. The five years period was chosen
based on the assumption that the RE projects belong to the medium term projects in country program. Energy
consumption and RE usage data were divided into two parts: fitting model, and model verification. The AAEP
criterion was used to evaluate the performance of the model. According to this criterion, the proposed model decreased
the total error percent as 0.2091% for the last 5 years (2010-2014). Moreover, the posterior distribution parameters
which were estimated through the proposed model, specified the growth rate of the RE usage. For the last scenario,
Mean+3*Sigma, the proportion of the RE consumption in the energy mix of the Japan reached to 29.61% until the
2030 year.
2778 Reza Nadimi et al. / Energy Procedia 142 (2017) 2773–2778
6 Author name / Energy Procedia 00 (2017) 000–000
References
[1] FCCC, “Adoption Of the Paris Agreement,” Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, 2015.
[2] GEA, "Global Energy Assessments," International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012.
[4] C. Deb, F. Zhang, J. Yang, S. E. Lee and K. W. Shah, "A review on time series forecasting techniques for building energy consumption,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 74, pp. Pages 902-924, 2017.
[5] H. S. G., R. Nadimi and S. F. Ghaderi, "A hybrid TSK-FR model to study short-term variations of the electricity demand versus the
temperature changes," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, pp. Pages 1765-1772, 2009.
[6] N. Bassamzadeh and R. Ghanem, "Multiscale stochasic prediction of electricity demand in smart grids using Bayesian networks," Applied
Energy, vol. 193, pp. 369-380, 2017.
[7] K. U. Rao and V. Kishore, "A review of technology diffusion models with special reference to renewable energy technology," Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, pp. 1070-1078, 2010.
[8] C.-Y. Lee and . S. Y. Huh, "Forecasting the diffusion of renewable electricity considering the impact of policy and oil prices: The case of
South Korea," Applied Energy, vol. 69, pp. 207-217, 2017.
[9] J. C. Fisher, "A simple substitution model of technological change," Technological Forcasting and social change, vol. 3, pp. 75-88, 1971.
[10] M. N. SHARIF and C. KABIR, "A Generalized Model for Forecasting Technological Substitution," TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING
AND SOCIAL CHANGE, vol. 8, pp. 353-364, 1976.
[11] N. MEADE, "Technological Substitution: A Framework of Stochastic Models," TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL
CHANGE, vol. 36, pp. 389-400, 1989.
[12] S.-Y. Huh and C.-Y. Lee, "Diffusion of renewable energy technologies in South Korea on incorporating their competitive
interrelationships," Energy Policy, vol. 69, pp. 248-257, 2014.
[13] N. Meade and T. Islam, "Modelling European usage of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation," Technological Forecasting
& Social change, vol. 90, pp. 497-509, 2015.
[14] R. Kumar and A. Agarwala, "Renewable energy technology diffusion model for techno-economics feasibility," Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, vol. 54, pp. 1515-1524, 2016.
[15] S. Ross, A first course in probability, Eighth Edition ed., United States of America: Prentice Hall (PEARSON), 2010.
[16] D. C. Montgomery, C. L. Jennins and M. Kulahci, Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting, WILEY-Interscience, 2008.
[17] J. E. Gentle, Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, George Mason University, 2004.
[18] IEA, "International Energy Agency," 4 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.iea.org.