Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DECEMBER 2016
DILIMAN, QUEZON CITY 1101
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My Family,
Friends,
Batchmates,
and
Late Grandfather,
Alter G. Monghit.
Para sa Bayan.
ii
ABSTRACT
Dialectology is the study of dialects and the Tagalog language is composed of different dialects
that are mutually intelligible. Some of the most notable dialects of Tagalog are Tagalog Manila,
Tagalog Bulacan, Tagalog Rizal, Tagalog Nueva Ecija, Tagalog Batangas, Tagalog Quezon, and
Tagalog Marinduque.
The focus of this study is to describe the variety of Tagalog spoken in the province of Laguna.
Linguistic fieldwork was done in ten towns in Laguna and an elicitation material made especially for
The gathered data were first compared to Tagalog Manila which is considered to be the most
prestigious variety of the Tagalog language. These two varieties were compared in two aspects:
This was followed by a discussion on phonological variation among Tagalog Laguna varieties.
Using a software called Cog, the percentage of phonetic similarity was computed to show the
Lastly, this research has also presented how lexical items in each town vary. The forms were
plotted in a map and there were five sets of isogloss made based on the distribution of these lexical
items. The lexical similarity percentage was also computed to show how these towns relate to each
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
iv
Map for Tiyan ‘stomach’……………………………………………………….……….…………….70
Map for Likod ‘back’…………………………………………………………….…….……………...71
Map for Tuhod ‘knee’…………………………………………………………….….………………72
Map for Pipi ‘mute’……………………………………………………………….….……………….73
Map for Dighay ‘burp’……………………………………………………………..…………………74
Map for Titi ‘penis’………………………………………………………………………...………….75
Map for Pepe ‘vagina’ ……………………………………………………………………..…………76
Map for Hatsing 'to sneeze'…………………………………………………………………..……….77
Map for Paa ‘foot’……………………………………………………………………………..………78
Map for Alakdan ‘scorpion’…………………………………………………………………..………79
Map for Alamang ‘small shrimp’……………………….……………………………………..……...80
Map for Talangka ‘swamp crab’………………………………………………………………..……81
Map for Asung ulul ‘mad dog’……………………….…………………………………………..…..82
Map for Bahaghari ‘rainbow’………………………………………….…………………………..…83
Map for Bangaw ‘fly’………………………………………………………………………………....84
Map for Biik ‘piglet’…………………………………………………………………………………..85
Map for Buko ‘coconut’……………………………………………………………………….…..….86
Map for Kalamansi ‘calamansi’……………………………………………………………..….…….87
Map for Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’…………………………………………………………..………88
Map for Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’…………………………………...………………………..……89
Map for Kopra ‘dried coconut meat’……………………..……………………………………..….…90
Map for Gagamba ‘spider’…………………………………….…………………………….……...…91
Map for Hanip ‘chicken louse’………………………….…………………………………………….92
Map for Ipis ‘cockroach……………………………..………………………………………………...93
Map for Langgam ‘ant’……………………………….……………………………………………….94
Map for Munggo ‘mung beans’………………………..……………………………………………...95
Map for Paniki ‘bat’…………………..……………………………………………………………….96
Map for Saput ‘cobweb’……………………………………………..………………………………...97
Map for Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’………………………………..……………………………………98
Map for Sitaw ‘string beans’…………………………………………………..………………………99
Map for Tuta ‘puppy’……………………………………………………………………….………..100
Map for Ulap ‘cloud’…………………………………………………….…………………………...101
Map for Ambon ‘drizzle’…………………………………………….………………………………102
Map for Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’………………….……………………………………………...103
Map for Tahol ‘to bark’………………………………………….…………………………………..104
Map for Maligamgam ‘lukewarm’……………………………………………………..……...…….105
Map for Suha ‘grapefruit’…………………………………………….……………………………...106
Map for Paru-paro ‘butterfly’………………………………………..…………………….…...……107
Map for Hamog ‘fog’………………………..………………………………………………………..108
Map for Buto ‘bone, seed’…………………………..………………………………………...……...109
Map for Buwan ‘moon, month’……………………………………………….……………………..110
v
Isogloss Set 1: One form for all……………………………………………………………………....111
Isogloss Set 2: One form in SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ and
another form in MG-PG-PA-SI-FA………………………………………………………………….112
Isogloss Set 3: One form in SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ-MG and
another form in PG-PA-SI-FA……………………………………………………………………….112
Isogloss Set 4: One form in SI and
another form in all the other towns………………………………………...………………………113
Isogloss Set 5: One form in RI and
another form in all the other towns…………………………….………………………………….114
Bundles of Isogloss…………………………………………..……………………………………...114
Graph of the Relationship of Ten Towns in Laguna Based on Lexical Similarity………………….116
vi
LIST OF TABLES
vii
Forms for Biloy ‘dimple’………………………………………………………………………………52
Forms for Bukung-bukong ‘ankle’…………...……………………………………………………….53
Forms for Gilagid ‘gums’……………..………………………………………………………………54
Forms for Lalamunan ‘throat’………………………………………………………………………..55
Forms for Sinat ‘mild fever’…………………………………………………………………………..56
Forms for Binat ‘relapse (of an ailment)’…………………………………………………………….57
Forms for Balinguynguy ‘nosebleed’………………………………………………………………….58
Forms for Banli ‘scald’………………………………………………………………………………...59
Forms for Kiliti ‘tickle’………………………………………………………………………………..60
Forms for Hikab ‘yawn’………………………………………………………………….……………61
Forms for Hilo ‘dizzy’…………………………………………………………………………………62
Forms for Nabulunan ‘to choke’……………………………………………………….……………..63
Forms for Nginig ‘to tremble’…………………………………………………………………………64
Forms for Salampak 'to sit on the floor'………………………………………………………………65
Forms for Tagyawat ‘pimple’…………………………………………………………………………66
Forms for Pusod ‘belly button'………………………………………………………………………..67
Forms for Noo ‘forehead’……………………………………………………………………………..68
Forms for Batok ‘nape’………………………………………………………………………………..69
Forms for Tiyan ‘stomach’…………………………………………………………………………….70
Forms for Likod ‘back’………………………………………………………………………………...71
Forms for Tuhod ‘knee’………………………………………………………………………………72
Forms for Pipi ‘mute’………………………………………………………………………………….73
Forms for Dighay ‘burp’………………………………………………………………………………74
Forms for Titi ‘penis’………………………………………………………………………………….75
Forms for Pepe ‘vagina’ ………………………………………………………………………………76
Forms for Hatsing 'to sneeze'………………………………………………………………………….77
Forms for Paa ‘foot’……………………………………………………………………………………78
Forms for Alakdan ‘scorpion’…………………………………………………………………………79
Forms for Alamang ‘small shrimp’……………………….…………………………………………...80
Forms for Talangka ‘swamp crab’……………………………………………………………………81
Forms for Asung ulul ‘mad dog’……………………….……………………………………………..82
Forms for Bahaghari ‘rainbow’………………………………………….……………………………83
Forms for Bangaw ‘fly’………………………………………………………………………………..84
Forms for Biik ‘piglet’…………………………………………………………………………………85
Forms for Buko ‘coconut’…………………………………………………………………………….86
Forms for Kalamansi ‘calamansi’…………………………………………………………………….87
Forms for Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’…………………………………………………………………88
Forms for Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’…………………………………...……………………………89
Forms for Kopra ‘dried coconut meat’……………………..…………………………………………90
Forms for Gagamba ‘spider’…………………………………….……………………………………91
Forms for Hanip ‘chicken louse’………………………….………………………………………….92
viii
Forms for Ipis ‘cockroach……………………………..……………………………………………...93
Forms for Langgam ‘ant’……………………………….…………………………………………….94
Forms for Munggo ‘mung beans’………………………..…………………………………………...95
Forms for Paniki ‘bat’…………………..…………………………………………………………….96
Forms for Saput ‘cobweb’……………………………………………..……………………………...97
Forms for Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’………………………………..…………………………………98
Forms for Sitaw ‘string beans’…………………………………………………..……………………99
Forms for Tuta ‘puppy’……………………………………………………………………………...100
Forms for Ulap ‘cloud’…………………………………………………….………………………...101
Forms for Ambon ‘drizzle’…………………………………………….……………………………102
Forms for Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’………………….…………………………………………...103
Forms for Tahol ‘to bark’………………………………………….………………………………..104
Forms for Maligamgam ‘lukewarm’……………………………………………………..………….105
Forms for Suha ‘grapefruit’…………………………………………….…………………………...106
Forms for Paru-paro ‘butterfly’………………………………………..……………………………107
Forms for Hamog ‘fog’………………………..……………………………………………………..108
Forms for Buto ‘bone, seed’…………………………..……………………………………………...109
Forms for Buwan ‘moon, month’……………………………………………….…………………..110
Lexical Similarity Percentage……………………………………………………………………….115
ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FA Famy
LI Liliw
MG Magdalena
MJ Majayjay
NG Nagcarlan
PA Paete
PG Pagsanjan
RI Rizal
SI Siniloan
SP San Pablo
x
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………..ii
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………………...iii
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………………….iv
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………………..vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………………….x
CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………..1
1. The Province of Laguna ………………………………………………………………………...1
1.1. The Tagalog Language………………………………………………………………………...2
1.2. Objectives of the Study………………………………………………………………………..3
1.3 Importance of the Study………………………………………………………………………3
1.4. Methodology………………………………………………………………………………….4
1.5. Scope and Limitations of the Study…………………………………………………………...5
1.6. Theoretical Framework………………………………………………………………………6
xi
4.1.2. Root-Final………………………………………………………………………23
4.1.3. Root-Medial…………………………………………………………………….24
4.2. Variation on Stress Placement…………………………………………………………28
4.3. Phonetic Similarity Percentage………………………………………………………...33
4.4. Summary……………………………………………………………………………….34
xii
5.2.24. Pusod ‘belly button'……………………………………………………………67
5.2.25. Noo ‘forehead’…………………………………………………………………68
5.2.26. Batok ‘nape’……………………………………………………………………69
5.2.27. Tiyan ‘stomach’………………………………………………………………..70
5.2.28. Likod ‘back’…………………………………………………………………….71
5.2.29. Tuhod ‘knee’…………………………………………………………………...72
5.2.30. Pipi ‘mute’……………………………………………………………………..73
5.2.31. Dighay ‘burp’…………………………………………………………………74
5.2.32. Titi ‘penis’……………………………………………………………………..75
5.2.33. Pepe ‘vagina’ …………………………………………………………………76
5.2.34. Hatsing 'to sneeze'…………………………………………………………….77
5.2.35. Paa ‘foot’………………………………………………………………………78
5.3. Nature……………………………………………………………………………………….79
5.3.1. Alakdan ‘scorpion’………………………………………………………………79
5.3.2. Alamang ‘small shrimp’………………………………………………………...80
5.3.3. Talangka ‘swamp crab’…………………………………………………………81
5.3.4. Asung ulul ‘mad dog’…………………………………………………………..82
5.3.5. Bahaghari ‘rainbow’……………………………………………………………83
5.3.6. Bangaw ‘fly’……………………………………………………………………..84
5.3.7. Biik ‘piglet’………………………………………………………………………85
5.3.8. Buko ‘coconut’………………………………………………………………….86
5.3.9. Kalamansi ‘calamansi’………………………………………………………….87
5.3.10. Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’……………………………………………………88
5.3.11. Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’……………………………………………………89
5.3.12. Kopra ‘dried coconut meat’……………………………………………………90
5.3.13. Gagamba ‘spider’………………………………………………………………91
5.3.14. Hanip ‘chicken louse’………………………………………………………….92
5.3.15. Ipis ‘cockroach………………………………………………………………...93
5.3.16. Langgam ‘ant’………………………………………………………………….94
5.3.17. Munggo ‘mung beans’………………………………………………………...95
5.3.18. Paniki ‘bat’…………………………………………………………………….96
5.3.19. Saput ‘cobweb’………………………………………………………………...97
5.3.20. Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’………………………………………………………98
5.3.21. Sitaw ‘string beans’……………………………………………………………99
5.3.22. Tuta ‘puppy’…………………………………………………………………..100
5.3.23. Ulap ‘cloud’…………………………………………………………………...101
5.3.24. Ambon ‘drizzle’………………………………………………………………102
5.3.25. Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’…………………………………………………...103
5.3.26. Tahol ‘to bark’………………………………………………………………..104
5.3.27. Maligamgam ‘lukewarm’…………………………………………………….105
5.3.28. Suha ‘grapefruit’……………………………………………………………...106
xiii
5.3.29. Paru-paro ‘butterfly’…………………………………………………………107
5.3.30. Hamog ‘fog’…………………………………………………………………..108
5.3.31. Buto ‘bone, seed’……………………………………………………………...109
5.3.32. Buwan ‘moon, month’………………………………………………………..110
5.4. Sets of Isogloss……………………………………………………………………………..111
5.4.1. Isogloss Set 1: One form for all………………………………………………..111
5.4.2. Isogloss Set 2: One form in SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ and
another form in MG-PG-PA-SI-FA………………………………………………….112
5.4.3. Isogloss Set 3: One form in SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ-MG and
another form in PG-PA-SI-FA……………………………………………………….112
5.4.4. Isogloss Set 4: One form in SI and
another form in all the other towns…………………………………………………113
5.4.5. Isogloss Set 5: One form in RI and
another form in all the other towns………………………………………………….114
5.4.6 Bundles of Isogloss……………………………………………………………...114
5.5. Lexical Similarity Percentage……………………………………………………………...115
5.6. Summary…………………………………………………………………………………..116
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...117
References………………………………………………………………………………………118
Appendix
xiv
Chapter 1
Introduction
Laguna is one of the provinces comprising Region IV-A (CALABARZON), the region which
has the biggest population in the country as of 2015. With a land area of 175, 973 ha (1, 759.73
km2), it has a population of approximately 3.04 million and is the third most populous province in
the whole archipelago. It is located in the southeast of Metro Manila, north of Batangas, east of
Cavite, and west of Quezon. The political structure of the province consists of 4 congressional
districts, 6 cities, 23 municipalities, and 674 barangays. The capital of Laguna province is the
On the north of the province is Laguna de Bay, the largest inland body of water in the
country and the third biggest lake in Asia. Mountains and mountain ranges also characterize the
topography of the province. These are Mount Makiling, Mount Banahaw, and the Sierra Madre
mountain range.
1
Because of its proximity to Metro Manila, the economy of Laguna is very thriving. It is
dubbed to be the “Detroit of the Philippines” because of the presence of automotive manufacturing
companies in the city of Sta. Rosa. It also earned the name of the “Silicon Valley of the Philippines”
since a number of factories specializing in electronics and semiconductors are based in this
province. In addition, it has become a tourist destination for its hot springs and spring resorts, thus
the name “Resort Capital of the Philippines”. The agricultural and fisheries sector of the province is
also flourishing because of the rich natural resources of Laguna and of the presence of Laguna Bay
and Mount Makiling which enrich the biodiversity of the area. The province of Laguna can also be
considered an education hub in Southern Luzon. It is home to several higher education institutions
like the University of the Philippines Los Baños, Polytechnic University of the Philippines-Laguna,
Like its nearby provinces, i.e. Quezon, Batangas, Rizal, and Metro Manila, Laguna is
primarily a Tagalog-speaking area. Besides Tagalog, English is the second most important language
The Tagalog language is one of the most widely spoken languages in the whole Philippine
archipelago. It is spoken by 25 million people all over the world in which 21 million is in the
Philippines (Ethnologue, 2016) . As proclaimed by the Constitution of the Philippines, it is the basis
subgroup and forms a smaller subgroup together with other Philippine languages found in southern
The language is spoken as a first language in Central Luzon and Southern Luzon, particularly
in Bataan, Bulacan, some parts of Nueva Ecija, Aurora, Batangas, Cavite, Laguna, Marinduque,
Occidental Mindoro, and Oriental Mindoro. The dialects of Tagalog can be named in which
province it is spoken. Thus, the Tagalog dialects are Tagalog Aurora, Tagalog Bataan, Tagalog
Batangas, Tagalog Bulacan, Tagalog Cavite, Tagalog Laguna, Tagalog Marinduque, Tagalog Mindoro,
2
Tagalog Nueva Ecija, Tagalog Quezon, and Tagalog Manila (Peneyra, 2003).
First, this research aims to describe the Tagalog language as it is spoken in the province of
Laguna. After gathering data from towns in Laguna chosen for this research, the results will be
contrasted with Tagalog Manila to show and prove that Tagalog Laguna is different from Tagalog
Laguna which is considered to be the most prestigious variety of Tagalog. These two varieties will be
compared in terms of phonology and morphosyntax. This will be followed by a discussion of the
phonology of the varieties of Tagalog Laguna. Based on two phonological features, the distribution
of the glottal stop and the position of stress in a lexical item, this research will show how similar and
different some varieties of Tagalog Laguna are. Using a software called Cog, the percentage of
phonetic similarity will also be computed to better present the variation between the speech of
Tagalog Laguna speakers. Lastly, this study will also show the lexical variation in three semantic
domains among the towns in Tagalog Laguna. These domains are kinship, body parts, and nature.
The results will also be presented with a dialect map and sets of isogloss will be identified, if there
are any. The program Cog will also be used to compute for the lexical similarity percentage of the
towns to show which towns share more cognate forms with each other.
Since most literature has covered other varieties of Tagalog (which will be discussed in Chapter
2), this focused research on Laguna Tagalog will be of great significance on describing this variety
which is less represented in Tagalog dialectology studies. It shall show the features of Laguna
Tagalog which could lead to a more comprehensive linguistic and dialectological description of the
Tagalog language. In addition, this will be essential to the study of the province of Laguna and of the
culture of Lagueños. With this study, may the natives of the province become prouder of their
language and heritage. With the implementation of Mother Tongue Based Multilingual Education in
the country, educators can consult this study to aid the teaching of the mother tongue in the
classroom. Even though using Tagalog Laguna as a medium of instruction in the classroom setting
3
may not face the same challenges as using other Philippine languages as media of instruction, this
study could help on teaching this variety to the younger generation of Lagueños by pointing out
how it is different from Filipino/Manila Tagalog; hence, making the variety flourish to the present
generation of speakers. Lastly, this research can also serve as a model for future dialectology studies
1.4. Methodology
For this research, the researcher will go to the field himself to do informant work with the
native speakers of Tagalog Laguna. The researcher will adopt the principle of plaza complex to look
for possible informants. During the Spanish colonial period, the center of the colonial government
was at the plaza, where the elites, the government, the Church, and other sectors under the
influence of the colonial rule were located. Most towns in Laguna have this kind of structure and by
this principle, in a given town, the researcher will go to the plaza and look for locals that have been
settling there since they were born. This is out of convenience since most of the time, the people
surrounding the area have settled there for a long time and could be a representative inhabitant of
their town. Furthermore, it is much safer to go around the vicinity of the plazas since “civilization” is
located in this area. In case of emergency, it is easier to call a person of authority and in commuting
from one town or the other, it is very advisable not to go faraway from the plazas since the terminals
The ideal informant is defined as someone who was born and has been living in the area for at
least fourteen years, and if possible, has not settled in any other place. For each town, at least two
informants should be primary informants while at least one other informant would be asked for the
verification of the data. However, due to one or several constraints like time and budget, there may
be an instance that only one informant may be interviewed for one town and there would be no
other informants available for the verification of data. In this case, at least, the informant should
The researcher has devised a word list of 138 lexical items and this was made possible by
consulting earlier dialectology studies of Tagalog. This was made to purposely elicit the differences
4
among the towns without going through to a very tedious word list. Before going to the field, the
researcher tried to use the word list to test speakers from Laguna and from the other parts of the
Tagalog-speaking region and their suggestions were very considered in making this word list.
For this study, the researcher was able to do field work for three consecutive long weekends.
The total duration of the fieldwork was nine days. For a single day, at least one town was visited and
if it was possible, another town or two were visited. The elicitation of data happened either by
one-by-one (between the researcher and one informant) or by a focused group discussion (between
the researcher and more than one informant) and the interviews were only recorded using a mobile
phone. Despite this, the audio was still of quality and clean. The researcher primarily used Tagalog
when interviewing the informants since most of them were not very confident speaking other
languages. Several techniques were used in eliciting data from the informants. These include asking
direct questions (‘How do you say “ant”?’), indirect questions (‘ ‘What is this?’, pointing something),
naming questions (‘What do you say to a caller at the door if you want him to enter?’ Answer: come
in), talking questions (What can you make from milk? Answer: butter, cheese), and reverse
questions (What’s the barn for, and where is it? The informant will talk about ‘barn’ but only this
word will be recorded), and completing questions (You sweeten tea with…? Answer: sugar)
After the data gathering, the audio recordings were transcribed and the similarity in phonology
It would have been very idealistic if all towns and boundaries of Laguna will be examined and
be part of this study. However, due to several constraints like time and budget, only ten of all the
municipalities and cities of Laguna will be considered in this research. These towns are San Pablo
(SP), Rizal (RI), Nagcarlan (NG), Liliw (LI), Majayjay (MJ), Magdalena (MG), Pagsanjan (PG), Paete
(PA), Siniloan (SI) and Famy (FA). These towns were chosen since these towns are the hardest ones to
get into which makes migration less possible compared to those who are near Metro Manila, are
considered by other speakers of Tagalog to have a strong “punto” (accent) when speaking, and its
5
location being locked by neighboring provinces Quezon and Rizal which are also known to have
very distinct varieties of Tagalog. The speech habits of these towns will only be compared with
Tagalog Manila and not with other Tagalog varieties like Tagalog Batangas, Tagalog Rizal, Tagalog
Quezon, etc. In comparing with Tagalog Manila, this research will only be focused on two aspects:
phonology and morphosyntax. In comparing all the ten varieties with each other, it will only be
limited with phonology and lexicon. Three domains will only be used in comparing the lexical
variation among the ten towns: kinship, body, and nature. These domains are less prone to
borrowing and exist in all of the towns. In addition, since only 75 lexical items are elaborately
discussed in Chapter 5, only these lexical items are computed for the phonetic similarity and lexical
similarity percentages.
intelligible dialects. According to (Chambers & Trudgill, 2004) , a variety of a language is a neutral
term that is applied to any particular kind of language considered as a single entity. For example,
Cockney English and middle-class New York City English are varieties of English. A dialect is
defined as a regional variety of a language or is the difference in the speech of one person based on
their place of origin (Cunanan, 2015) . Two speakers speak different dialects of the same language
when there is a difference in speech yet still understand each other. In linguistics, this is known as
6
the concept of mutual intelligibility. The differences could be in sound, stress, vocabulary,
However, in reality, determining the boundary between a language or dialect and another
language or dialect is very hard especially in terms of a dialect continuum. This is a linguistic
situation when the mutual intelligibility between dialects exists in a continuum. As one progresses
from one dialect after the other, the farther it gets, the larger the differences are. This makes closer
dialects intelligible with each other but those farther ones less intelligible; the ones in the middle can
understand more or less the varieties at the both ends of the continuum.
One way of comparing dialects of the same language is by comparing them using lexical items.
In this study, the principle of lexicostatistics will be used to find the cognate percentage of the
varieties chosen. Two morphemes are cognates if they are similar in form and meaning (Crowley,
1997) . Therefore, [Ɂʌrʌg’jʌn] ‘way’ and [Ɂʌlʌg’jʌn] ‘way’ are cognates (Javier, 2012) . When the
cognate percentages are computed already, their value will tell us if the relationships of the attested
Language 81-100
Family 36-81
Stock 12-36
Microphylum 4-12
Mesophylum 1-4
Macrophylum <1
Lastly, the isogloss is where the boundary of a certain linguistic feature can be found. When
these isoglosses are combined, it is called a bundle (Chambers & Trudgill, 2004).
7
Chapter 2
Review of Related Literature
The Tagalog language may be considered as the most studied and documented language in the
Philippines. This is due to the fact that the national language is based on it and it is spoken in Metro
Manila, the political and economic center of the country. No wonder that much has been written
about its grammar, usage, history, and diversity. Below is a series of descriptions of some literature
on the Tagalog language and even on Philippine dialectology studies that have been useful in this
research.
One of the earliest works in the Tagalog Language based on contemporary linguistics is
Bloomfield’s Tagalog Texts with Grammatical Analysis (1917). The book has two parts: Part I is a
collection of Tagalog texts in phonetic transcription with an English translation while Part II is an
“The second limitation could not be overcome. As there exists at present no adequate description of
the dialectal differentiation of Tagalog, nor even an adequate description of any form of the
language, I can make no definite statement as to the relation of Mr. Santiago’s speech to other forms
of Tagalog.”
Bloomfield’s informant, Mr. Alfredo Viola Santiago, was a student of architectural engineering
at the University of Illinois and was a native of San Miguel na Matames, Bulacan. Thus, the dialect
described by Bloomfield was clearly Tagalog Bulacan. He compared the speech of his informant
with a Tagalog translation of Noli Me Tangere and found out that there was no significant
difference between the two. He also made a distinction between educated and uneducated speech.
During that time, he could not find a speaker of another Tagalog dialect nor any uneducated
speaker of Tagalog for his research. As a whole, this proves that as early that time, there was a need
8
for dialectology research on the Tagalog language.
In 1972, Schachter and Otanes published another reference grammar of Tagalog and noted
there are at least six notable dialects of Tagalog. These are Bataan, Batangas, Bulacan, Manila,
Tanay-Paete, and Tayabas. According to them, even though Tagalog Bulacan is regarded by many as
the “purest” variety since it shows fewer signs of influence from other languages, it is Tagalog
Manila which is considered the standard variety because of its prestige being the variety of the
capital and its high number of speakers. Their reference grammar is based on Tagalog Manila
Before this research on Tagalog Laguna was made, there have been several researches done in
the past that describe the diversity of the Tagalog language. Among the varieties of Tagalog that
have been recorded in linguistic literature are Tagalog Marinduque, Tagalog Rizal, Tagalog Nueva
One of the pioneering studies on Tagalog dialectology is by Lopez (1970), which focuses about
Tagalog Marinduque. Originally written decades before, the paper was only actually available in
print in 1970. The researcher did not go to Marinduque himself to conduct fieldwork, but instead,
interacted with a family from Boak, Marinduque that was staying in Manila. He asked his informant
to narrate a story in Tagalog Marinduque and then provided an English translation of the story. He
enumerated some lexical peculiarities in Tagalog Marinduque which either have a different shade
of meaning or usage compared to Tagalog Manila or are not found in Tagalog Manila. Some
peculiarities of Tagalog Marinduque include the use of the suffixes -an or -in for -a and -i
especially in the imperative, the presence of the Bisayan reflex u/o for words showing the pepet,
among others. Lastly, Lopez compared some Boak Marinduque expressions with other varieties of
Tagalog in Southern Luzon which are Tagalog Batangas (Lipa), Tagalog Cavite (Imus), Tagalog
Laguna (Lilio), and Tagalog Tayabas (Gumaka). This may be considered to be the first in integrating
9
several other varieties of Tagalog in one study. Because of its striking differences with other varieties
Other papers written about the dialect are Soberano (1977) and most recently, Tolentino
(2013). Soberano (1977) examines the phonological system, morphological processes, and syntactic
structures of Tagalog Marinduque and utilizes a 3oo-item word list. Compared to Lopez (1970), it
has a richer amount of data and analysis of this Tagalog variety. This research shows that there are
two major dialect areas in the island: Eastern Marinduque (EM) and Western Marinduque (WM).
The towns are separated geographically and this situation resulted in the development of two
varieties. Neighboring dialects and languages also affected the linguistic situation in the province.
Eastern Marinduque may have adopted the ‘ga’ interrogative marker from natives of Batangas who
settled there and some of its morphological processes from neighboring Visayan languages.
Unlike the two preceding types of research, Tolentino (2013) has compiled unique lexical items
found in Tagalog Marinduque under four semantic domains (i.e. farming, fishing, Nipa hut, and
religious practices during Lenten season) and using the lens of anthropological linguistics, describes
the culture of this particular group of Tagalog speakers. Ten speakers from Eastern Marinduque
were the informants for this study. What do these lexical words signify? According to Tolentino
(2013), language addresses the need of their speakers to communicate with each other that is
molded by their culture. The major industries and means of livelihood of the Marinduqueños, their
religion and traditions, and the environment they live in all affect their daily lives. As a result, they
have developed a system of naming things that is relevant in their culture and in their industries.
Even though these words still exist in the everyday life of the Tagalog Marinduque speakers, some
members of the younger generation are not very familiar on some of them and this indicates that
Paz (1999a), Paz (1999b) and Santiago (2015) are all descriptions of the Tagalog language
as it is spoken in the language of Rizal. Paz (1999a) talks about the different phonological
10
differences of the relic areas in Rizal while Paz (1999b) presents a preliminary dialectological study
of Tagalog Rizal. Paz (1999b) argues that Tagalog Rizal is a separate dialect of Tagalog in its own
right due to its own set of unique lexical items compared with other varieties of Tagalog, in this case,
the Tagalog of Greater Manila. Because of the differences of the varieties of each town in Rizal, the
existence of a relic area is proposed in this province. Relic areas are places that are not reached nor
affected by linguistic innovations. In Rizal, the first relic area (R1) consists of Teresa, Morong,
Cardona, and Baras while the second relic area (R2) is Taytay.
Paz (1999a), the other study, expands the discussion of Tagalog Rizal, now covering the
sound changes that this variety underwent. It points out the language loyalty of these relic areas, i.e.
when the speakers continue to use their own variety, which became the reason for the
Santiago (2015) focuses on the variety of the Tagalog language in Morong, Rizal by
examining some lexical items. Even though this is only one town, Tagalog Morong showed variation
in terms of lexicon. However, as what the author said, the study is not representative since only one
Besides Tagalog Marinduque and Tagalog Rizal, other varieties of Tagalog have also been
the focus of some linguistic studies. Abella (2012) is about Tagalog Nueva Ecija, Estraño (2013)
Focusing on Tagalog Nueva Ecija, Abella (2012) investigates how different it is from the
prestigious form of Tagalog that is spoken primarily in Manila. After analyzing the argument
structure of this variety, it was proven that the ergative case markers mark the absolutives, while
absolutive case markers mark the oblique case in Tagalog Nueva Ecija sentences. These
constructions are more accepted by speakers from the first and second districts of Nueva Ecija than
from the third and fourth districts. It was also concluded that among Kapampangan, Ilocano, and
Pangasinan languages, only Kapampangan affected the structure of Tagalog Nueva Ecija which is
apparent in its enclitic combination. Since the first and second districts of Nueva Ecija are near to
11
the Kapampangan-speaking Tarlac and Pampanga, it was no wonder that those constructions are
Meanwhile, Estraño (2013) presents lexical items that were found to be peculiar compared
with Tagalog Manila and words that originated from Bulacan. Furthermore, it also briefly describes
the phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics of this Tagalog variety. Based on the gathered
data, the domain of food has the most number of entries. This may due to the fact that Bulacan is
Katigbak (2014) presents another perspective of studying Tagalog varieties by analyzing the
intonational structure of Batangas Tagalog. Seven different patterns were identified in Tagalog
Batangas. However, this does not neglect the fact that among the informants, variation was also
observed.
ask if there is any study that integrates all of these varieties. Peneyra’s Isang Rekonstraksyong
Internal ng Tagalog Batay Sa mga Piling Dayalek (2003) reconstructs the development of the
aspectual markers in Tagalog and some lexical items that have altering forms in different dialects.
This dissertation includes data from several varieties of Tagalog: Bataan, Batangas, Bulacan, Cavite,
Laguna, Marinduque, Oriental Mindoro, Occidental Mindoro, Quezon, and Rizal. As far as Tagalog
Laguna is concerned, the varieties of Cavinti, Lumbang, Majayjay, and Siniloan were the chosen
Northern Tagalog (NT) and Southern Tagalog (ST). Tagalog Laguna, with Tagalog Quezon and
Tagalog Cavite, is classified under Southern Tagalog, placed under the subgroup of Tagalog
Batangas, Tagalog Occidental Mindoro, and Tagalog Oriental Mindoro. On the other hand,
Northern Tagalog is composed of Tagalog Bataan, Tagalog Bulacan, and Tagalog Rizal. This is due to
the distribution of the affixes -a-, maː -, naː -, and C1V1 in which Tagalog Laguna only retained
naː-
12
2.3. Dialectology of Other Philippine Languages
Putting Tagalog dialectology studies aside, there are other dialectology papers on other
Philippine languages. Some of the recent are Javier (2012) and Cunanan (2015). Javier (2012)
investigates the dialectal variation of Inonhan in the island of Isla de Carabao, Romblon by
comparing their lexicons and performing lexicostatistics to show cognate percentage. The results
show that all the varieties share approximately 80 percent of their cognates; they are dialects of the
Inonhan language. However, this is not conclusive because there are overlapping isoglosses.
In another study, Cunanan (2015) explores the different kinds of Bicol in the province of
Sorsogon. Using a word list, words from different towns of Sorsogon were compared. Using
lexicostatistics and mapping of isoglosses, it is found out that the town of Pilar is the most different
variety. In this dialect, it developed the sounds of [L] and [ə], lost the [h] sound, and altered the
position of [ʔ]. In addition, the groupings of the dialects are 1.) Bacon and Magallanes, 2.) Gubat,
Irosin, Sta. Magdalena, and Matnog, and 3.) Sorsogon, Castilla, and Juban.
methodologies were adopted by language scholars to empirically show the similarities and
differences of the languages and dialects in the archipelago. Some opt to gather unique lexical items,
some opt to compare the varieties of nearby towns; some chose to use lexicostatistics and isoglosses
while some chose to reconstruct the proto-language; some adopted an ethnolinguistic approach,
some preferred acoustic phonetics. It can also be said that most of the Tagalog dialectology studies
included Tagalog Manila as a point of comparison. If all the research on Tagalog dialectology will be
listed, a keen eye will be able to see that there is clearly an under-representation of Tagalog Laguna
13
Chapter 3
Comparison of Tagalog Manila and Tagalog Laguna
After interviewing several informants from ten towns in Laguna, different speech patterns and
habits of these speakers have been found to be noticeable from speakers from other
Tagalog-speaking regions, especially from Metro Manila. In this chapter, Tagalog Laguna will be
compared with Tagalog Manila and their differences in some aspects of phonology and
3.1. Phonology
According to Peneyra (2003), unlike other languages, all the dialects of the Tagalog language
have the same number of vowels, consonants, and glides. The following are the phonemes of
this regard and does have the same set of phonemes. However, the phonology of Tagalog Laguna has
certain characteristics that cannot be found or are different compared to other varieties, for
example, Tagalog Manila. These include the position of the glottal stop and the placement of stress
in a lexical item.
Even though Tagalog Laguna shares the same set of phonemes with other dialects of Tagalog,
some varieties of Tagalog Laguna allow the glottal stop /ʔ/ at the onset of the ultimate syllable in a
lexical root. For example, the lexical items gabi, bagang, ngayon, and katawan are not pronounced
with a glottal stop before the vowel in their ultimate syllables in Tagalog Manila but in some
Tagalog Laguna varieties, the glottal stop is present in this environment. Thus, these lexical items are
pronounced [gab.'ʔi], [bag.'ʔaŋ], [ŋaj.'ʔon], and [ka.taw.'ʔan] (See Table 2). From another point of
view, as Peneyra (2003) mentions, the glottal stop is the second segment of a word-medial
consonant cluster, and in the course of the development of language, it is dropped to reduce the
14
number of word-medial-consonant clusters. The distribution of the glottal stop in different towns in
Table 2. Lexical Roots without the Word-Medial Glottal Stop in Tagalog Manila but with in Tagalog
Laguna
Stress is phonemic in Tagalog since a different position of the stress may change the meaning of
a word. According to Tantiangco et al. (2009), stress may be determined by three factors: intensity
(loudness), frequency (pitch), and length (duration). Among these three factors, length is proven to
be the most reliable criterion for stress placement. The phonemicity of stress in Tagalog can be seen
There are lexical items in Tagalog Laguna which the stress occurs in a different position
compared to Tagalog Manila. Sometimes, when the stress of a lexical item in Tagalog Manila is in
the ultimate, the stress in Tagalog Laguna is in the penultimate. If spoken in Manila, the lexical items
imis, balibag, and buwan are pronounced with a stress in the last syllable but if in Laguna, the stress
of these roots is on the penultimate syllable, without a change in meaning. On the other hand, the
reverse also happens. Among the words elicited, there is one lexical item which is pipi, when
15
pronounced in Tagalog Manila, has penultimate stress but when pronounced in Tagalog Laguna,
has ultimate stress (See Table 5). The variation of stress placement in the different varieties of
forcefully’
Table 4 . Roots with Ultimate Stress in Tagalog Manila but Penultimate Stress in Tagalog Laguna
Table 5. A Root with Penultimate Stress in Tagalog Manila but Ultimate Stress in Tagalog Laguna
3.2. Morphosyntax
morphemes but it can be easily divided into their component parts (normally its root and its affix/es)
that typically represent only a single grammatical category or meaning (Steinberg in O'Grady &
Archibald, 2008). For example, in an adjective like maganda, the affix is ma- which is an adjectival
affix and the root is ganda ‘beautiful’. Tagalog Laguna has also some unique features on its
morphology and syntax which are not present or different in Tagalog Manila. Some of these are the
use of the verbal affix naː-, the the question marker baga, the intensifer bale, and the interjection ay.
16
3.2.1. Verbal Affix
Between the morphosyntax of Tagalog Laguna and Tagalog Manila, the biggest and most
noticeable difference is on the verbal morphology. The actor-focus imperfective aspect affix
-um-+C1V1 of Tagalog Manila is expressed as naː- in Tagalog Laguna. Even though the form of
these two affixes are different, their function and meaning are the same. However, the usage of naː- is
only limited to the actor-focus imperfective aspect, it cannot be used in other aspect and mood. For
example, when the -um- verb is expressed in the imperative or in another aspect, the verb conjugated
*Nainom ka ng tubig
Juan will drink water later. Iinom si Juan ng tubig mamaya. Iinom si Juan ng tubig mamaya.
mamaya.
17
3.2.2. Question Marker
Speakers of Tagalog Laguna use the form baga in an interrogative expression. This is equivalent
to the ba of Tagalog Bulacan and Tagalog Manila speakers and of ga of Tagalog Batangas and
Tagalog Quezon speakers. Panganiban (1972) believes that the original form of the question marker
is said to be *baga (* here signifies a proto-form), and an evidence of this is the phrase kung baga or
What do you call it? Ano nga ba ang tawag doon? Ano nga baga ang tawag doon?
Where did you come from? Saan ka ba galing? Saan ka baga galing?
Isn’t it called ‘tauban’? Hindi ba ang tawag ay ‘tauban’? Hindi baga ang tawag ay
‘tauban’?
3.2.3. Intensifier
An intensifier is used to express the intensity, degree, or quality denoted by a stative (Schachter
& Otanes, 1972). Some intensifiers in Tagalog Manila are napaka-, sobra, ubod ng, and masyado.
also used: bale. This intensifier is said to be heard until Lucban, Quezon, and it can be used as an
expression on its own. As an adjective, it carries the meaning of “nakakainis” or “to be annoyed ”, e.g.
18
bale naman ‘to o!. It can be connected with a stative using the linker na, e.g. baleng ganda (but the
linker may also be dropped, e.g. bale saya). In some other towns, this form is shortened to bang
3.2.4. Interjection
Based from the data collected in this study, Tagalog Laguna speakers tend to use the ay-
sentence form more than Tagalog Manila speakers and this may give the impression that they speak
very formal or bookish. For example, in Manila, it is more normal to say Kumakain ako than ako ay
kumakain. The ako ay kumakain is much more used in Tagalog Laguna. However, what will be
described here is the other ay which is an interjection and this monosyllabic interjection is very
common to Tagalog Laguna speakers from SP and RI. In discourse, this interjection may also be used
when the predicate is dropped and functions as a filler in a sentence, as in “ito ay!” and “ang batang
iri ay!”. In fact, SP speakers also call their hometown “San Pabló’y”! Sometimes, when placed at the
end of the sentence, it tends to cliticize and attach itself to the preceding segment if it is a vowel and
particularly a pronoun. In Tagalog Manila, the meaning of this interjection is expressed by eh.
We will fall down because Mahuhulog kami sa iyo eh! Mahuhulog kami sa iyo’y!
of you!
Oh no, I just only know Naku, kaing lang ang alam ko Aa, kaing laang ang alam ko’y.
‘kaing’. eh.
19
3.3. Summary
Examining some of the components of phonology and morphosyntax of Tagalog Manila and
Tagalog Laguna, it is proven that Tagalog Laguna is a separate variety from Tagalog Manila. It could
be seen that there exists a difference between these two varieties. First, even though these two
varieties have the same number of phonemes, the difference could appear in the distribution of
these sounds. One example of this is the distribution of the glottal stop. In some varieties of Laguna,
the glottal stop /ʔ/ can be found at the onset of the ultimate syllable in a lexical root but in Tagalog
Manila, the glottal stop will not be seen in this type of environment. In addition, the position of the
stress in a lexical root can vary between the two varieties. Sometimes, when the stress of a lexical
item in Tagalog Manila is in the ultimate, the stress in Tagalog Laguna is in the penultimate and the
On the differences between the morphosyntax of Tagalog Manila and Tagalog Laguna, they
could be seen in the forms used by these two varieties. When a Tagalog Manila speaker uses the
affix -um-+C1V1, the Tagalog Laguna speaker might use the affix naː-. When asking a question, the
Tagalog Laguna speaker may be more comfortable in using baga than using ba which is considered
the standard. Lastly, a Tagalog Laguna speaker, when expressing certain emotions, might like to use
the forms bale! or ay! which the Tagalog Manila speaker might find new to his/her ear.
20
Chapter 4
Phonological Variation in Tagalog Laguna
In this chapter, a focused discussion of the phonological system of the different varieties of
Tagalog Laguna will be presented. Comparing the data gathered from ten towns in Laguna, namely,
San Pablo (SP), Rizal (RI), Nagcarlan (NG), Liliw (LI), Majayjay (MJ), Magdalena (MG), Pagsanjan
(PG), Paete (PA), Siniloan (SI), and Famy (FA), the similarities and differences of their phonological
systems will be identified by examining in these varieties the distribution of the glottal stop and the
placement of stress in a lexical root. The discussion will only be limited to these two phonological
phenomena since these are the only two distinctive features that significantly showed variation
among the data gathered from the ten towns in Laguna being investigated in this study. Lastly, The
phonetic similarity of the forms in this study will be analyzed numerically using a computer
software.
In Section 3.1.1., it is attested that in Tagalog Laguna, the glottal stop can be present at the onset
of the ultimate syllable in a lexical root and can become the second segment of a word-medial
consonant cluster. In this section, the distribution of the glottal stop root-initially, root-finally, and
root-medially in Tagalog Laguna varieties will be further investigated. Among these three
distributions, the most number of examples will be given for roots with medial glottal stops since
they show the most number of variation among the surveyed area. Data from the town surveyed
will be presented correspondingly to find out if the distribution of the glottal stop is the same
21
4.1.1. Root-Initial
First, the glottal stop can be found word-initially. Table 11 shows the form of each town for
Town Form
SP [ʔam.'piː.jas]
RI [ʔam.'piː.jas]
NG [ʔam.'piː.jas]
LI [ʔam.'piː.jas]
MJ [ʔam.'piː.jas]
MG [ʔam.'pjas]
PG [ʔam.'pjas]
PA [ʔam.'piː.jas]
SI [ʔam.'piː.jas]
FA [ʔam.'piː.jas]
Eight towns (SP, RI, NG, LI, MJ, PA, SI, and FA) use the term [ʔam.'piː.jas] while the two other
towns, MG and PG, use the term [ʔam.'pjas]. The /i/ phoneme was omitted and this resulted to a
consonant cluster. Nevertheless, what has not been changed is the position of the glottal stop; it is
22
4.1.2. Root-Final
The glottal stop can also be present at the end of a lexical root. An example of such distribution
Town Form
SP ['baː.baʔ]
RI ['baː.baʔ]
NG ['baː.baʔ]
LI ['baː.baʔ]
MJ ['baː.baʔ]
MG ['baː.baʔ]
PG ['baː.baʔ]
PA ['baː.baʔ]
SI ['baː.baʔ]
FA ['baː.baʔ]
As what can be seen from the table above, all of the towns unanimously use the term ['baː.baʔ]
for ‘chin’. In this lexical root, the glottal stop is present at the end.
Based from the two preceding subsections, the glottal stop is undeniably can be found at the
beginning and at the end of a lexical root in all of the surveyed varieties. Now, is this also true if the
23
4.1.3. Root-Medial
This subsection is going to concentrate on the distribution of the glottal stop root-medially,
forming the cluster C+ʔ in which C can be a consonant or a glide and the glottal stop serves as the
second segment. Five instances will be given below (Table 13 - Table 17.).
Town Form
SP [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
RI [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
NG [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
LI [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
MJ [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
MG [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
PG [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
PA [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
SI [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
FA [da.'ʔus.ʔus]
Based from the table above, all of the towns use the term [da.'ʔus.ʔus] for dausdos ‘to slide’. This
lexical item shows the sequence of a consonant (in this case is /s/) and a glottal stop and in this case,
all of the ten towns manifest this special consonant cluster by the glottal stop. According to Peneyra
(2003, p. 80), the proto-form of [da.'ʔus.ʔus] is *dalusdos and this form used by Tagalog Laguna
speakers is a result of series of sound changes: the deletion of /l/ (*dalusdos → *dausdos), the
insertion of the glottal stop since the phonotactics of Tagalog does not allow two succeeding vowels
(*daʔusdos), and the distant assimilation of /d/ to the preceding glottal stop (*daʔusʔos).
24
Town Form
SP [ka.ta.'wan]
RI [ka.taw.'ʔan]
NG [ka.taw.'ʔan]
LI [ka.taw.'ʔan]
MJ [ka.ta.'wan]
MG [ka.ta.'wan]
PG [ka.ta.'wan]
PA [ka.ta.'wan]
SI [ka.ta.'wan]
FA [ka.ta.'wan]
As what can be seen from Table 14, there are two forms for the word katawan ‘body’. Majority
of the towns (SP, MJ, MG, PG, PA, SI, and FA) have the form [ka.ta.'wan], which is the same with
Tagalog Manila. However, the towns of RI, NG, and LI use the form [ka.taw.'ʔan] which contains a
Town Form
SP [bag.'ʔaŋ]
RI [ba.'gaŋ]
NG [bag.'ʔaŋ]
LI [bag.'ʔaŋ]
MJ [ba.'gaŋ]
MG [ba.'gaŋ]
PG [ba.'gaŋ]
PA [ba.'gaŋ]
25
SI [ba.'gaŋ]
FA [ba.'gaŋ]
Just like katawan, there are also two forms of bagang ‘molars’ among Tagalog Laguna varieties.
In SP, NG, and LI, they use [bag.'ʔaŋ] which retains the glottal stop while the other towns, RI, MJ, MG,
PG, PA, SI, and FA, use [ba.'gaŋ], the same with Tagalog Manila.
Town Form
SP [bu.'to]
RI [but.'ʔo]
NG [bu.'to]
LI [but.'ʔo]
MJ [bu.'to]
MG [bu.'to]
PG [bu.'to]
PA [bu.'to]
SI [bu.'to]
FA [bu.'to]
Based from Table 16, only two towns retain the glottal stop in their form of buto ‘seed’. RI and
LI both use the term [but.'ʔo] which has the glottal stop while the rest of the ten towns use the form
26
Town Form
SP [baŋ.'ʔaw]
RI [baŋ.'ʔaw]
NG ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
LI ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
MJ ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
MG [ʔu.'lul]
PG ['ʔaː.suŋ ʔu.'lul]
PA ['ʔaː.suŋ ba.'liw]
SI ['ʔaː.suŋ 'baː.liw]
FA ['ʔaː.suŋ 'baː.liw]
Last among this set of words is the word for asung ulul 'mad dog'. As what is indicated on the
table above, there are four forms in Tagalog Laguna for this expression. The four adjectives are
[baŋ.'ʔaw], [ʔu.'lul], [ba.'liw] and ['baː.liw]. The first five towns (SP, RI, NG, LI and MJ) all use the
term [baŋ.'ʔaw], which has the glottal stop consonant cluster, while MG and PJ use [ʔu.'lul]. Between
[ba.'liw] and ['baː.liw], there is only a difference in stress. The former is only found in PA while the
When the results are plotted in a map, as what can be seen in Figure 4, (In this case, the
number of circle refers to the instances of the word-medial glottal stop in a variety), it shows that
the concentration of the towns exhibiting this feature is at the SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ area. As one goes up
from MG to FA, this feature begins to decrease and do not occur as much.
27
Figure 4. Distribution of the Word-Medial Glottal Stop
In Section 3.1.2., it is shown that between Tagalog Manila and Tagalog Laguna, a difference
in the placement of stress exists. In this section, it will be examined whether the placement of stress
in some roots in Tagalog Laguna is consistent all throughout the ten varieties surveyed.
Town Form
SP ['ʔiː.mis]
RI ['ʔiː.mis]
NG ['ʔiː.mis]
LI ['ʔiː.mis]
MJ ['ʔiː.mis]
MG ['ʔiː.mis]
PG ['ʔiː.mis]
PA ['ʔiː.mis]
SI ['ʔiː.mis]
28
FA ['ʔiː.mis]
According to Table 18, all of the varieties put the stress of the root imis on the penultimate
syllable: ['ʔiː.mis]. This is unlike the Tagalog Manila pronunciation of this root, which is the stress is
Town Form
SP [bu.'wan]
RI ['buː.wan]
NG ['buː.wan]
LI ['buː.wan]
MJ ['buː.wan]
MG [bu.'wan]
PG [bu.'wan]
PA [bu.'wan]
SI ['buː.wan]
FA [bu.'wan]
Consulting Table 19, there are two varying forms for the root buwan ‘moon, month’. Half of the
towns (RI, NG, LI, MJ, and SI) use the term ['buː.wan] which the stress is manifested on the first
syllable. The other half (SP, MG, PG, PA, and FA) prefer the stress on the last syllable; hence,
[bu.'wan].
29
Town Form
SP [le.'ʔeg]
RI [li.'ʔeg]
NG ['liː.ʔeg]
LI ['liː.ʔeg]
MJ [le.'ʔeg]
MG [le.'ʔeg]
PG [li.'ʔeg]
PA [le.'ʔeg]
SI ['liː.ʔeg]
FA [le.'ʔeg]
Based on the forms on Table 20, there are three forms for the root leeg ‘neck’. These are [le.'ʔeg],
[li.'ʔeg], and ['liː.ʔeg]. The first two forms manifest a difference in vowel length but have the same
stress placement (on the ultimate syllable) while the last one places the stress on the penultimate
syllable. Out of the ten varieties, only three of the towns use the form with the penultimate stress
(NG, LI, and SI) and the rest prefer the form with the ultimate stress.
Town Form
SP [bi.'ʔik]
RI [bi.'ʔek]
NG ['biː.ʔik]
LI [bi.'ʔek]
MJ ['biː.ʔik]
MG ['biː.ʔik]
PG ['biː.ʔik]
30
PA [bi.'ʔik]
SI [bi.'ʔik]
FA -----
Unlike the preceding table, Table 21 presents a variation between two forms. One is ['biː.ʔik]
which is spoken in four towns (NG, MJ, MG, and PG) and the other one is [bi.'ʔik] is heard in the
rest of the towns. The former places the stress on the penultimate while the latter on the ultimate
syllable.
Town Form
SP [ʔi.'kab]
RI ['hiː.gab]
NG ['hiː.kab]
LI ['hiː.gab]
MJ ['hiː.kab]
MG [hi.'kab]
PG ['hiː.kab]
PA ['hiː.kab]
SI [hi.'kab]
FA ['hiː.kab]
As what can be seen above, despite having four variations of the term hikab ‘yawn’: [ʔi.'kab],
['hiː.gab], ['hiː.kab], and [hi.'kab], they still can be grouped according to stress placement. Thus,
[ʔi.'kab] and [hi.'kab] may be grouped together for putting the stress on the ultimate syllable while
['hiː.gab] and ['hiː.kab] are similar on having the penultimate stress. Out of the ten towns, majority of
31
them uses the term which carries the penultimate stress (RI, NG, LI, MJ, PG, PA, and FA) while the
remaining three prefer the one with the ultimate stress (SP, MJ, and SI).
If the results are plotted in a map, as what can be seen in Figure 5, (In this case, the number of
circle refers to the instances of the penultimate stress in a variety), it shows that the concentration of
the towns exhibiting this feature is at the RI-NG-LI-MJ area. This feature begins to decrease and do
32
4.3. Phonetic Similarity Percentage
The phonetic similarity of forms in this study was analyzed numerically and this was
performed through a software called Cog. The results are presented in a table below:
SP RI NG LI MJ MG PG PA SI FA
SP 95 91 90 95 94 97 91 88 92
RI 95 94 91 94 92 94 91 91 94
NG 91 94 95 93 91 90 87 85 87
LI 90 91 95 96 96 94 93 90 93
MJ 95 94 93 96 97 99 93 90 93
MG 94 92 91 96 97 98 90 90 90
PG 97 94 90 94 99 98 93 92 92
PA 91 91 87 93 93 90 93 92 94
SI 88 91 85 90 90 90 92 92 98
FA 92 94 87 93 93 90 92 94 98
With percentages above 80%, it shows that all of these towns are still dialects of one language.
Phonetically speaking, there is a major division between the three northernmost towns which are FA,
SI, and PA and the other seven towns, which are SP, RI, NG, LI, MJ, MG, and PG. This may be due to
phonological features like the position of stress and the position of the glottal stop that vary per
town and gradually change as one travels upward from SP to FA. Among all of the towns, NG-SI has
the lowest percentage of phonetic similarity. With 99%, PG-MJ has the highest percentage of
A graph is also used to illustrate the relationship of the towns with each other (See Figure 6).
33
Figure 6. Graph of the Relationship of Ten Towns in Laguna Based on Phonetic Similarity
4.4. Summary
In this chapter, the variation of the ten towns in Laguna on the phonological level is
investigated. This is examined through two phonological phenomena: the distribution of the glottal
The glottal stop can be seen root-initially and root-finally in all of the ten towns. However,
there is a variation among the towns when the glottal stop is positioned root-medially. When the
results are placed in a map, it shows that the concentration of the towns exhibiting this feature is at
Likewise, the placement of stress among the ten towns may sometimes be the same or not.
When taking into consideration the number of words that have penultimate stress but in other
towns these words have ultimate stress, the RI-NG-LI-MJ area has the most number of such
instances. This feature tends to not occur as much in the towns nearby.
Computing the phonetic similarity percentage of these towns, it is still safe to conclude that
these towns are dialects of one language. On this aspect, there is a major division between FA, SI,
and PA and SP, RI, NG, LI, MJ, MG, and PG. NG-SI has the lowest percentage of phonetic similarity
while PG-MJ has the highest percentage of phonetic similarity with each other.
34
Chapter 5
Lexical Variation in Tagalog Laguna
In this chapter, the differences and similarities in the lexicon used by the ten towns in Laguna
will be examined. The lexical items will be classified into three different categories: kinship, body,
and nature. These domains are less prone to borrowing and are well manifested in the collected data
for this study. Out of the 138 lexical items in the original word list, only 75 lexical items will be
discussed in this chapter: 8 for kinship, 35 for body, and 32 for nature. Dialect maps will also be
presented and the lexical similarity percentage will be computed to quantitatively show the lexical
35
5.1. Kinship
In this section, eight different lexical items related to kinship will be presented with their
corresponding term in each town and map to show the distribution of the forms in each town.
Town Form
SP
['loː.lo]
RI
[ʔan.'daʔ], ['maː.maj]
NG
['loː.lo]
LI
[ʔan.'daʔ]
MJ
['loː.lo], [ʔa.'maː.ma]
MG
['loː.lo]
PG
['loː.lo]
PA
['daː.daj]
SI
['taː.ta]
FA ['taː.ta] Figure 7. Map for Lolo ‘grandfather’
Six forms have been found to correspond to Lolo ‘grandfather’ among the surveyed towns in
Laguna. Most of the towns, namely, SP, NG, MJ, MG, and PG use the term ['loː.lo] while the two
northernmost towns (SI and FA) prefer to use ['taː.ta]. LI and and RI, on the other hand, prefer to use
[ʔan.'daʔ] which can also be used to address an older person regardless of gender. RI speakers also
tend to address their grandfather as ['maː.maj] while MJ speakers would prefer [ʔa.'maː.ma] or
['loː.lo]. As we can see, these last two forms are related in form. Lastly, Tagalog speakers from PA use
the form ['daː.daj], which could be from [ʔan.'daʔ] since both of these terms are applicable to address
36
5.1.2. Lola ‘grandmother’
Town Form
SP
['loː.la]
RI
[ʔan.'daʔ], ['naː.naj]
NG
['loː.la]
LI
[ʔan.'daʔ]
MJ
['loː.la], [ʔi.'naː.na]
MG
['loː.la]
PG
['loː.la]
PA
['daː.daj]
SI
['naː.na]
FA ['naː.na]
Table 25. Forms for Lola ‘grandmother’ Figure 8. Map for Lola ‘grandmother’
Similar to the results for the Lolo ‘grandfather’, six forms for Lola ‘grandmother’ have been
recorded. These are: ['loː.la], [ʔan.'daʔ], ['naː.na], ['daː.daj], ['naː.naj], and [ʔi.'naː.na]. While most of
the towns use ['loː.la], SI and FA both prefer ['naː.na]. In RI, this becomes ['naː.naj] and in MJ,
[ʔi.'naː.na]. RI speakers may also use the term [ʔan.'daʔ] which can also be heard in LI. In PA, it
became ['daː.daj].
37
5.1.3. Ama ‘father’
Town Form
SP
['taː.taj]
RI
[ʔa.'ma], [ʔi.'taj], ['taː.taj]
NG
['taː.taj]
LI
[ʔa.'ma]
MJ
[ʔa.'ma]
MG
['taː.taj]
PG
---------
PA
['taː.taj]
SI
['taː.taj]
FA
['taː.taj]
Table 26. Forms for Ama ‘father’ Figure 9. Map for Ama ‘father’
Only four different forms of Ama ‘father’ have been found and most of the towns use the
term ['taː.taj]. Variation only showed up in three towns: in RI, LI, and MJ. LI and MJ both use [ʔa.'ma]
38
5.1.4. Ina ‘mother’
Town Form
SP
[ʔi.'naj]
RI
[ʔi.'na] ['naː.naj] [ʔi.'naj]
NG
['naː.naj]
LI
[ʔi.'na]
MJ
[ʔi.'na]
MG
['naː.naj]
PG
---------
PA
['naː.naj]
SI
['naː.naj]
FA
['naː.naj]
Table 27. Forms for Ina ‘mother’ Figure 10. Map for Ina ‘mother’
['naː.naj], [ʔi.'naj], and [ʔi.'na] are the forms for Ina ‘mother’ gathered from these ten Laguna
towns. RI showed all of the three terms while in LI and MJ, they use [ʔi.'na]. Rest of the towns prefer
['naː.naj].
39
5.1.5. Kuya ‘older brother’
Town Form
SP
['kuː.ja]
RI
['kuː.ja]
NG
['kuː.ja]
LI
['kuː.ja]
MJ
['kuː.ja]
MG
['kuː.ja]
PG
['kuː.ja]
PA
['kuː.ja]
SI
[ka.'kaʔ]
FA
['kuː.ja]
Table 28. Forms for Kuya ‘older brother’ Figure 11. Map for Kuya ‘older brother’
There are only two terms for older brother in Laguna. One is ['kuː.ja] which is present in
nine towns. The other one, [ka.'kaʔ], is only found in SI. Both of these forms are borrowed from
40
5.1.6. Ate ‘older sister’
Town Form
SP
['ʔaː.te]
RI
['ʔaː.te]
NG
['ʔaː.te]
LI
['ʔaː.te]
MJ
['ʔaː.te]
MG
['ʔaː.te]
PG
['ʔaː.te]
PA
['ʔaː.te]
SI
[ka.'kaʔ]
FA
['ʔaː.te]
Table 29. Forms for Ate ‘older sister’ Figure 12. Map for Ate ‘older sister’
['ʔaː.te] and [ka.'kaʔ] are the two only found terms for Ate ‘older sister’ among the ten towns.
SI is the only town that prefers to use [ka.'kaʔ], a gender-neutral word used to address an older sibling
41
5.1.7. Tito ‘uncle’
Town Form
SP
['tiː.jo]
RI
['tiː.jo] [a.ma.'ʔiŋ]
NG
['tiː.jo]
LI
['tiː.jo], ['kuː.ja]
MJ
['tiː.jo]
MG
['tiː.jo] [tʃong]
PG
['tiː.jo]
PA
['tiː.to]
SI
[juː.jo]
FA
[juː.jo] [ka.'kaʔ]
Table 30. Forms for Tito ‘uncle’ Figure 13. Map for Tito ‘uncle’
Based from the data presented above, there are seven terms to denote Tito ‘uncle’. To
enumerate, these are ['tiː.jo], [juː.jo], [a.ma.'ʔiŋ], ['kuː.ja], [tʃong], [ka.'kaʔ], and ['tiː.to]. From SP up to
PG, ['tiː.jo] is being used but there are also other forms that could be heard in this area. For example,
in RI, they also use [a.ma.'ʔiŋ], in LI, [tʃong] which is also derived from ['tiː.jo], and in LI, ['kuː.ja] .
Beyond PG, other forms are being used to mean uncle. In PA, ['tiː.to] is spoken while in SI and FA,
[juː.jo] is the preferred term. In FA, [ka.'kaʔ], which means ‘older sibling’ in the nearby town SI, can
also be used to mean uncle. This is similar to the case of RI where ['kuː.ja], which originally means
‘older brother’ can be used to address one’s uncle. Lastly, some informants remarked that the younger
generation may now prefer ['tiː.to] which they think is very ‘modern’ and is an influence of Tagalog
42
5.1.8. Tita ‘aunt’
Town Form
SP
['tiː.ja]
RI
['tiː.ja] [tʃaŋ] [da.'gaː.hin]
NG
['tiː.ja]
LI
['tiː.ja]
MJ
['tiː.ja]
MG
['tiː.ja] [tʃang]
PG
['tiː.ja]
PA
['tiː.ta]
SI
[jaː.ja]
FA
[jaː.ja] [ka.'kaʔ]
Table 31. Forms for Tita ‘aunt’ Figure 14. Map for Tita ‘aunt’
Similar to section 6.1.7. Tito ‘uncle’, there is an equal number of terms for Tita ‘aunt’. Seven
of the ten towns use ['tiː.ja], while SI and FA prefer [jaː.ja], whose meaning is different in Manila, i.e.
househelper. [ka.'kaʔ] may also be used in FA while [tʃang] are both spoken in RI and MG. ['tiː.ta] is
used in PA while [da.'gaː.hin], the feminine counterpart of [a.ma.'ʔiŋ] is only heard in RI.
43
5.2. Body
In this section, 35 different lexical items related to the body, body parts, and actions and
phenomena related to the body will be presented below with their corresponding term in each town.
Town Form
SP [ka.ta.'wan]
RI [ka.taw.'ʔan]
NG [ka.taw.'ʔan]
LI [ka.taw.'ʔan]
MJ [ka.ta.'wan]
MG [ka.ta.'wan]
PG [ka.ta.'wan]
PA [ka.ta.'wan]
SI [ka.ta.'wan]
FA [ka.ta.'wan]
Table 32. Forms for Katawan ‘body’ Figure 15. Map for Katawan ‘body’
As what can be seen on 32, there are two forms for the word Katawan ‘body’. Majority of
the towns (SP, MJ, MG, PG, PA, SI, and FA) have the form [ka.ta.'wan]. However, the towns of RI, NG,
and LI use the form [ka.taw.'ʔan] which contains a glottal stop in a word-medial position.
44
5.2.2. Tenga ‘ear’
Town Form
SP
['teː.ŋa]
RI
['tej.ŋa]
NG
['tej.ŋa]
LI
['teː.ŋa]
MJ
['teː.ŋa]
MG
[ta.'ʔiː.ŋa]
PG
[ta.'ʔiː.ŋa]
PA
['teː.ŋa]
SI
[ta.'ʔiː.ŋa]
FA
['teː.ŋa]
Table 33. Forms for Tenga ‘ear’ Figure 16. Map for Tenga ‘ear’
Based from the data presented above, there are three variant forms for Tenga ‘ear’. These are
['teː.ŋa], [ta.'ʔiː.ŋa], and ['tej.ŋa]. The longest form among the three, [ta.'ʔiː.ŋa], which is probably the
older form of the word, is only retained in three towns: MG, PG, and SI. Then, its later form, ['tej.ŋa]
is only present in two neighboring towns: RI and NG. ['teː.ŋa], which probably could be the latest
form, has the widest distribution. It is present in SP, LI, MJ, PA, and FA.
45
5.2.3. Leeg ‘neck’
Town Form
SP
[le.'ʔeg]
RI
[li.'ʔeg]
NG
['liː.ʔeg]
LI
['liː.ʔeg]
MJ
[le.'ʔeg]
MG
[le.'ʔeg]
PG
[li.'ʔeg]
PA
[le.'ʔeg]
SI
['liː.ʔeg]
FA
[le.'ʔeg]
Table 34. Forms for Leeg ‘neck’ Figure 17. Map for Leeg ‘neck’
Half of the towns use the form [le.'ʔeg] and these are SP, MJ, MG, PA, and FA. In RI and PG,
[li.'ʔeg] is heard while its cognate in NG, LI, and SI carries the stress on the first syllable; hence,
['liː.ʔeg].
46
5.2.4.Panga ‘jaw’
Town Form
SP
[pa.'ŋa]
RI
[pa.'ŋa]
NG
[pa.'ŋa]
LI
[pa.'ŋa]
MJ
[pa.'ŋa]
MG
[pa.'ŋa]
PG
[pa.'ŋa]
PA
[pa.'ŋa]
SI
[pa.'ŋa]
FA
[pa.'ŋa]
Table 35. Forms for Panga ‘jaw’ Figure 18. Map for Panga ‘jaw’
In this case, all of the towns are unanimous. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[pa.'ŋa].
47
5.2.5. Bagang ‘molars’
Town Form
SP
[bag.'ʔaŋ]
RI
[ba.'gaŋ]
NG
[bag.'ʔaŋ]
LI
[bag.'ʔaŋ]
MJ
[ba.'gaŋ]
MG
[ba.'gaŋ]
PG
[ba.'gaŋ]
PA
[ba.'gaŋ]
SI
[ba.'gaŋ]
FA
[ba.'gaŋ]
Table 36. Forms for Bagang ‘molars’ Figure 19. Map for Bagang ‘molars’
Among the towns in Laguna, there are two forms of bagang ‘molars’. In SP, NG, and LI, they
use [bag.'ʔaŋ] while all the other towns: RI, MJ, MG, PG, PA, SI, and FA use [ba.'gaŋ]. This example
show the retention and innovation of the word-medial glottal stop in Tagalog Laguna.
48
5.2.6. Baba ‘chin’
Town Form
SP
['baː.baʔ]
RI
['baː.baʔ]
NG
['baː.baʔ]
LI
['baː.baʔ]
MJ
['baː.baʔ]
MG
['baː.baʔ]
PG
['baː.baʔ]
PA
['baː.baʔ]
SI
['baː.baʔ]
FA
['baː.baʔ]
Table 37. Forms for Baba ‘chin’ Figure 20. Map for Baba ‘chin’
In this case, all of the towns are unanimous. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
['baː.baʔ].
49
5.2.7. Balakang ‘hip’
Town Form
SP
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
RI
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
NG
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
LI
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
MJ
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
MG
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
PG
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
PA
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
SI
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
FA
[ba.la.'kaŋ]
Table 38. Forms for Balakang ‘hip’ Figure 21. Map for Balakang ‘hip’
For Balakang ‘hip’, there is only one form found: [ba.la.'kaŋ]. This is found in all of the
towns.
50
5.2.8. Balakubak ‘dandruff’
Town Form
SP
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
RI
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
NG
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
LI
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
MJ
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
MG
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
PG
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
PA
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
SI
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
FA
[ba.la.'kuː.bak]
Table 39. Forms for Balakubak ‘dandruff’ Figure 22. Map for Balakubak ‘dandruff’
In this case, all of the towns are unanimous. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ba.la.'kuː.bak].
51
5.2.9. Biloy ‘dimple’
Town Form
SP
['biː.loj]
RI
['biː.loj]
NG
['biː.loj]
LI
['biː.loj]
MJ
[bi.'ʔoj]
MG
[bi.'ʔoj]
PG
['biː.loj]
PA
['biː.loj]
SI
['biː.loj]
FA
['biː.loj]
Table 40. Forms for Biloy ‘dimple’ Figure 23. Map for Biloy ‘dimple’
For Biloy ‘dimple’, we have two possible forms; these are ['biː.loj] and [bi.'ʔoj]. Majority of the
towns use the term ['biː.loj] while only two towns, MJ and MG, use the form [bi.'ʔoj], in which the
52
5.2.10. Bukung-bukong ‘ankle’
Town Form
SP
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
RI
[bu.'ʔol]
NG
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
LI
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
MJ
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
MG
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
PG
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
PA
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
SI
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
FA
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ]
Table 41. Forms for Bukung-bukong ‘ankle’ Figure 24. Map for Bukung-bukong ‘ankle’
['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ] and [bu.'ʔol] are the two terms for Bukung-bukong ‘ankle’. Only RI use the
term [bu.'ʔol] while all of the other towns prefer ['buː.kuŋ 'buː.kuŋ].
53
5.2.11. Gilagid ‘gums’
Town Form
SP
[gi.'laː.gid]
RI
['ŋid.ŋid]
NG
[gi.'laː.gid]
LI
[gi.'laː.gid]
MJ
[gi.'laː.gid]
MG
[gi.'laː.gid]
PG
[gi.'laː.gid]
PA
[gi.'laː.gid]
SI
[gi.'laː.gid]
FA
[gi.'laː.gid]
Table 42. Forms for Gilagid ‘gums’ Figure 25. Map for Gilagid ‘gums’
For Gilagid ‘gums’, there are two possible forms; these are [gi.'laː.gid] and ['ŋid.ŋid]. Majority
of the towns use the term ['biː.loj] while only one town, MJ and MG, use the form ['ŋid.ŋid].
54
5.2.12. Lalamunan ‘throat’
Town Form
SP
[la.la.'muː.nan] [la.la.'ʔuː.gan]
RI
[la.la.'muː.nan]
NG
[la.la.'muː.nan]
LI
[la.la.'muː.nan]
MJ
[la.la.'ʔuː.gan]
MG
[la.la.'muː.nan]
PG
[la.la.'muː.nan]
PA
[la.la.'muː.nan]
SI
[la.la.'muː.nan]
FA
[la.la.'muː.nan]
Table 43. Forms for Lalamunan ‘throat’ Figure 26. Map for Lalamunan ‘throat’
Among the the ten towns, only two of the towns manifested the term [la.la.'ʔuː.gan]; these towns
are MJ and SP. Other towns, however, use the term [la.la.'muː.nan], which is also present in SP.
55
5.2.13. Sinat ‘mild fever’
Town Form
SP
['siː.nat]
RI
['sej.nat]
NG
['siː.nat]
LI
['siː.nat]
MJ
['siː.nat]
MG
['siː.nat]
PG
['siː.nat]
PA
['siː.nat]
SI
['saj.nat]
FA
['siː.nat]
Table 44. Forms for Sinat ‘mild fever’ Figure 27. Map for Sinat ‘mild fever’
For Sinat ‘mild fever’, ['siː.nat] has the widest distribution. It is found in SP, NG, LI, MJ, MG, PG,
56
5.2.14. Binat ‘relapse (of an ailment)’
Town Form
SP
['biː.nat]
RI
['bej.nat]
NG
['baj.nat]
LI
['bej.nat]
MJ
['baj.nat]
MG
['biː.nat]
PG
['biː.nat]
PA
['baj.nat]
SI
['biː.nat]
FA
['baj.nat]
Table 45. Forms for Binat ‘relapse (of an ailment)’ Figure 28. Map for Binat ‘relapse (of an ailment)’
For Binat ‘relapse (of an ailment)’’, ['biː.nat] is heard in SP, MG, PG and SI. On the other hand,
['baj.nat] is spoken in NG, MJ, PA, and FA. Lastly, ['bej.nat] is only present in two towns. These are
RI and LI.
57
5.2.15. Balinguynguy ‘nosebleed’
Town Form
SP
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
RI
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
NG
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
LI
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
MJ
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
MG
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
PG
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
PA
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
SI
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
FA
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj]
Table 46. Forms for Balinguynguy ‘nosebleed’ Figure 29. Map for Balinguynguy ‘nosebleed’
In this case, all of the towns are unanimous. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ba.li.'ŋuj.ŋuj].
58
5.2.16. Banli ‘scald’
Town Form
SP
[na.ban.li.'ʔan]
RI
[na.ban.li.'ʔan]
NG
[ban.'liʔ]
LI
[ban.'jos]
MJ
[ban.'liʔ]
MG
[na.ban.li.'ʔan]
PG
[ban.'liʔ]
PA
[ban.'liʔ]
SI
[na.ban.li.'ʔan]
FA
[ban.'liʔ]
Table 47. Forms for Banli ‘scald’ Figure 30. Map for Banli ‘scald’
Based on Table 47, there are three forms for Banli ‘scald’: [na.ban.li.'ʔan], [ban.'liʔ], and
[ban.'jos]. Since [na.ban.li.'ʔan] is just a derivation of [ban.'liʔ], these two forms will only be
considered as one here. Thus, all of the towns except RI use the term [ban.'liʔ] since RI prefers to use
59
5.2.17. Kiliti ‘tickle’
Town Form
SP
[ki.li.'tiʔ]
RI
[ki.li.'teʔ]
NG
[ki.li.'teʔ]
LI
[ki.li.'teʔ]
MJ
[ki.li.'teʔ]
MG
[ki.li.'teʔ]
PG
[ki.li.'teʔ]
PA
[ki.li.'teʔ]
SI
[ki.li.'teʔ]
FA
[ki.li.'teʔ]
Table 48. Forms for Kiliti ‘tickle’ Figure 31. Map for Kiliti ‘tickle’
For Kiliti ‘tickle’, there are two forms found: [ki.li.'teʔ] and [ki.li.'tiʔ]. [ki.li.'tiʔ] is only found in
SP while the rest of the towns use [ki.li.'teʔ]. These two forms only show a difference in one segment.
60
5.2.18. Hikab ‘yawn’
Town Form
SP [ʔi.'kab]
RI ['hiː.gab]
NG ['hiː.kab]
LI ['hiː.gab]
MJ ['hiː.kab]
MG [hi.'kab]
PG ['hiː.kab]
PA ['hiː.kab]
SI [hi.'kab]
FA ['hiː.kab]
Table 49. Forms for Hikab ‘yawn’ Figure 32. Map for Hikab ‘yawn’
For Hikab ‘yawn’, there are four different forms found among these ten towns in Laguna.
['hiː.kab] has the widest distribution. It is spoken in NG, MJ, PG, PA, and FA. In MG, the stress of this
word falls on the ultimate syllable, hence, the form ['hiː.kab]. In RI and LI, the medial consonant is
voiced (['hiː.gab]) while the voiced glottal fricative in [hi.'kab] turned to a glottal stop in SP.
61
5.2.19. Hilo ‘dizzy’
Town Form
SP
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
RI
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
NG
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo], [naː.'luː.lum.bat]
LI
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
MJ
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
MG
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
PG
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
PA
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
SI
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
FA
[naː.hi.'hiː.lo]
Table 50. Forms for Hilo ‘dizzy’ Figure 33. Map for Hilo ‘dizzy’
All of the towns use [naː.hi.'hiː.lo] for Hilo ‘dizzy’. However, in NG, another term could also be
62
5.2.20. Nabulunan ‘to choke’
Town Form
SP
[na.bu.'luː.nan], [naː.hi.'riː.nan]
RI [na.tig.'ʔa.kan], [na.bi.la.'ʔuː.kan],
[na.hi.'riː.nan]
NG
[na.tig.'ʔa.kan], [na.hi.'riː.nan]
LI
[na.bu.'luː.nan]
MJ
[na.tig.'ʔa.kan], [na.bi.la.'ʔuː.kan]
MG
[na.bu.'luː.nan]
PG
[na.bi.la.'ʔuː.kan]
PA
[naː.hi.'riː.nan]
SI
[na.bu.'luː.nan]
FA
[na.tig.'ʔa.kan], [na.'tul.ʔu.nan]
Table 51. Forms for Nabulunan ‘to choke’ Figure 34. Map for Nabulunan ‘to choke’
In this word, four forms have been found: [na.bu.'luː.nan], [naː.hi.'riː.nan], [na.tig.'ʔa.kan],
[na.bi.la.'ʔuː.kan], and [na.'tul.ʔu.nan]. [na.bu.'luː.nan] is found in four towns, namely SP, LI, MG, and
SI. With equal number of towns, [na.hi.'riː.nan] is also found in SP, RI, NG, and PAE. [na.tig.'ʔa.kan] is
also spoken in four towns: RI, NG, MJ, and FA. Meanwhile, three towns use the term
[na.bi.la.'ʔuː.kan]. These are RI, MJ, and PG. It is only FA that uses [na.'tul.ʔu.nan].
63
5.2.21. Nginig ‘to tremble’
Town Form
SP
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
RI
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
NG
[ki.naː.ka.'lig.kig]
LI
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig], [ki.naː.ka.'lig.kig]
MJ
[ki.naː.ka.'log.kog]
MG
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
PG
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
PA
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
SI
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
FA
[na.ŋi.'ŋiː.kiʔ], [na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
Table 52. Forms for Nginig ‘to tremble’ Figure 35. Map for Nginig ‘to tremble’
According to the data presented above, it is undeniably that [na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig] is the most widely
spoken word for Nginig ‘to tremble’. Out of the ten towns, it is used in seven towns, namely, SP, RI,
LI, MG, PG, PA, and SI. Also, in NG, LI, and FA, [ki.naː.ka.'lig.kig] is preferred. In MJ, the vowel of this
term changes from [o] to [i], thus, [ki.naː.ka.'log.kog]. Lastly, [na.ŋi.'ŋiː.kiʔ] is spoken in FA.
64
5.2.22. Salampak 'to sit on the floor'
Town Form
SP
[sa.lag.'pak], [na.ka.lu.'paː.geʔ]
RI
[si.lag.'mak] [na.ka.lu.'paː.geʔ]
NG
[si.'lag.mak]
LI
[sa.'lag.mak]
MJ
[sa.'lag.mak]
MG
[sa.'lag.mak]
PG
[sa.'lam.pak]
PA
[na.ka.lu.'paː.giʔ]
SI
[na.ka.lu.'paː.giʔ]
FA
[sa.lam.'pak]
Table 53. Forms for Salampak 'to sit on the floor' Figure 36. Map for Salampak 'to sit on the floor'
With six forms, this word has one of the most number of forms in different towns. In PA and SI,
[na.ka.lu.'paː.giʔ] is their term for Salampak 'to sit on the floor' while with just a difference in a
vowel, [na.ka.lu.'paː.geʔ] is heard in SP and RI. These two pairs of towns are very close to each other.
Meanwhile, RI and MG use the term [si.'lag.mak] and LI, MJ, and MG alters the first vowel to [a],
[sa.'lag.mak]. In PG and FA, speakers prefer to use [sa.'lam.pak] and [sa.lag.'pak] is only heard in SP.
65
5.2.23. Tagyawat ‘pimple’
Town Form
SP
[ta.gi.'haː.wat]
RI
[tag.hi.'jaː.wat]
NG
[tag.'jaː.wat]
LI
[tag.'jaː.wat]
MJ
[tag.'jaː.wat]
MG
[tig.'jaː.wat]
PG
[tag.'jaː.wat]
PA
[ti.'gaː.wat]
SI
[ti.'gaː.wat]
FA
[tig.'haː.wat]
Table 54. Forms for Tagyawat ‘pimple’ Figure 37. Map for Tagyawat ‘pimple’
Just like the preceding section, this also yielded a lot of different forms. The form spoken by the
most number of towns is [tag.'jaː.wat]. These are NG, LI, MJ, and PG. PA and SI prefer the form
[ti.'gaː.wat]. All the remaining forms are spoken in one town only. [ta.gi.'haː.wat], [tag.hi.'jaː.wat],
66
5.2.24. Pusod ‘belly button'
Town Form
SP
['puː.sod]
RI
['puː.sod]
NG
['puː.sod]
LI
['puː.sod]
MJ
['puː.sod]
MG
['puː.sod]
PG
['puː.sod]
PA
['puː.sod]
SI
['puː.sod]
FA
['puː.sod]
Table 55. Forms for Pusod ‘belly button' Figure 38. Map for Pusod ‘belly button'
In this case, all of the towns are unanimous. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
['puː.sod].
67
5.2.25. Noo ‘forehead’
Town Form
SP
['nuː.ʔo]
RI
['nuː.ʔo]
NG
['nuː.ʔo]
LI
['nuː.ʔo]
MJ
['nuː.ʔo]
MG
['nuː.ʔo]
PG
['noː.ʔo]
PA
['nuː.ʔo]
SI
['nuː.ʔo]
FA
['nuː.ʔo]
Table 56. Forms for Noo ‘forehead’ Figure 39. Map for Noo ‘forehead’
For Noo ‘forehead’, there are two forms and their difference is only on the vowel: ['nuː.ʔo] and
['noː.ʔo]. The former is spoken in nine towns while the latter is only spoken in RI.
68
5.2.26. Batok ‘nape’
Town Form
SP
['baː.tok]
RI
['baː.tok]
NG
['baː.tok]
LI
['baː.tok]
MJ
['baː.tok]
MG
['baː.tok]
PG
['baː.tok]
PA
['baː.tok]
SI
['baː.tok]
FA
['baː.tok]
Table 57. Forms for Batok ‘nape’ Figure 40. Map for Batok ‘nape’
For Batok ‘nape’, there is only one form found: ['baː.tok]. This is found in all of the towns.
69
5.2.27. Tiyan ‘stomach’
Town Form
SP
[tʃan]
RI
[ti.'jan]
NG
['tiː.jan]
LI
[ti.'jan]
MJ
[ti.'jan]
MG
[tʃan]
PG
[tʃan]
PA
[ti.'jan]
SI
[ti.'jan]
FA
[tʃan]
Table 58. Forms for Tiyan ‘stomach’ Figure 41. Map for Tiyan ‘stomach’
For Tiyan ‘stomach’, there are three forms found among the ten towns. [ti.'jan] is found RI, LI,
MJ, PA, and SI. [tʃan] is also found in four towns, SP, MG, PG, and FA. The oldest form of this word,
70
5.2.28. Likod ‘back’
Town Form
SP
[li.'kud]
RI
[li.'kud]
NG
[li.'kod]
LI
[li.'kod]
MJ
[li.'kud]
MG
[li.'kud]
PG
[li.'kud]
PA
[li.'kud]
SI
[li.'kud]
FA
[li.'kud]
Table 59. Forms for Likod ‘back’ Figure 42. Map for Likod ‘back’
For Likod ‘back’, there are two forms and their difference is only on the vowel: [li.'kud] and
[li.'kod]. The former is spoken in eight towns while the latter is only spoken in NG and LI..
71
5.2.29. Tuhod ‘knee’
Town Form
SP
['tuː.hod]
RI
['tuː.hod]
NG
['tuː.hod]
LI
['tuː.hod]
MJ
['tuː.hod]
MG
['tuː.hod]
PG
['tuː.hod]
PA
['tuː.hod]
SI
['tuː.hod]
FA
['tuː.hod]
Table 60. Forms for Tuhod ‘knee’ Figure 43. Map for Tuhod ‘knee’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
['tuː.hod].
72
5.2.30. Pipi ‘mute’
Town Form
SP
[pi.'pe]
RI
[pi.'pe], [ʔa.'paw]
NG
[pi.'pe]
LI
[pi.'pe]
MJ
[ʔa.'paw]
MG
['piː.pe]
PG
[pi.'pe]
PA
['piː.pe]
SI
['piː.pe]
FA
['piː.pe]
Table 61. Forms for Pipi ‘mute’ Figure 44. Map for Pipi ‘mute’
For Pipi ‘mute’, there are three forms. The first two forms only have a difference on stress:
[pi.'pe] and ['piː.pe] while the other one [ʔa.'paw] is a completely different from. [pi.'pe] is the most
widely distributed term among the three, spoken in SP, RI, NG, LI, and PG. The other form, ['piː.pe] is
spoken in MG, PA, SI and FA. [ʔa.'paw] may be derogatory since it could also mean ‘a dumb person’,
73
5.2.31. Dighay ‘burp’
Town Form
SP
[dig.'hal]
RI
[tik.'hal]
NG
['dig.hal]
LI
[dig.'hal]
MJ
[dig.'haj]
MG
[dig.'hal]
PG
[dig.'haj]
PA
[tik.'hal]
SI
[dig.'haj]
FA
[dig.'haj]
Table 62. Forms for Dighay ‘burp’ Figure 45. Map for Dighay ‘burp’
[dig.'hal], which is used in SP, LI, and MG, and ['dig.hal] which is spoken in NG, show a
difference on stress. In RI and PA, the consonants of the first syllable of this word are not voiced,
hence, [tik.'hal]. MJ, PG, SI and FA, on the other hand, prefer to use [dig.'haj].
74
5.2.32. Titi ‘penis’
Town Form
SP
['ʔuː.ten]
RI
['ʔuː.ten]
NG
['tiː.teʔ]
LI
['tiː.teʔ]
MJ
['ʔuː.ten]
MG
['ʔuː.ten]
PG
['ʔuː.ten]
PA
['ʔuː.ten]
SI
['ʔuː.tin]
FA
['ʔuː.tin]
Table 63. Forms for Titi ‘penis’ Figure 46. Map for Titi ‘penis’
There are three forms for Titi ‘penis’. These are ['ʔuː.ten], ['ʔuː.tin], and ['tiː.teʔ]. Informants say
that ['ʔuː.ten] and ['ʔuː.tin] usually refer to the reproductive organ of an older person while ['tiː.teʔ]
is for a younger person. ['ʔuː.ten] is used in SP, RI, MJ, MG, PG, and PA while ['ʔuː.tin] is heard in the
75
5.2.33. Pepe ‘vagina’
Town Form
SP
['puː.ke] ['peː.peʔ]
RI
['puː.ke] ['kiː.keʔ]
NG
['kiː.keʔ] ['peː.peʔ]
LI
['peː.peʔ]
MJ
['puː.ke] ['kiː.keʔ]
MG
['peː.peʔ] ['puː.ke]
PG
['puː.ke]
PA
['puː.ke] ['kiː.keʔ]
SI
['puː.ki] ['kiː.kiʔ]
FA
['puː.ki]
Table 64. Forms for Pepe ‘vagina’ Figure 47. Map for Pepe ‘vagina’
There are five forms for Pepe ‘vagina’, these are ['peː.peʔ], ['puː.ke] and ['puː.ki], and ['kiː.keʔ]
['kiː.kiʔ]. The two pairs only show a difference on vowel. ['puː.ke] has the widest distribution, being
spoken in SP, RI, NG, MJ, MG, PG, and PA. Coming after it is ['kiː.keʔ], used in RI, NG, MJ, and PA and
76
5.2.34. Hatsing 'to sneeze'
Town Form
SP
[ba.'hen]
RI
[ba.'heŋ]
NG
['haː.ʧiŋ]
LI
[ba.'hen]
MJ
[ba.'hiŋ]
MG
[ba.'hen]
PG
[ba.'hin]
PA
[ba.'hin]
SI
[ba.'hin]
FA
['haː.ʧiŋ]
Table 65. Forms for Hatsing 'to sneeze' Figure 48. Map for Hatsing 'to sneeze'
For Hatsing 'to sneeze', there are five forms. These are [ba.'hen], [ba.'hin], ['haː.ʧiŋ], [ba.'heŋ],
and [ba.'hiŋ]. Based from the forms, there is a variation between the vowels [e] and [i] and the two
word-final nasals. [ba.'hen] is the most widely spoken form. It is heard in SP, LI, and NG. On the
other hand, [ba.'hin] is used in PG, PA, and SI. ['haː.ʧiŋ] is used in two towns: NG and FA. The forms
ending with the velar nasal are only found in two towns: RI ([ba.'heŋ]) and MJ ([ba.'hiŋ]).
77
5.2.35. Paa ‘foot’
Town Form
SP
['paː.ʔa]
RI
['paː.ʔa]
NG
['paː.ʔa]
LI
['paː.ʔa]
MJ
['paː.ʔa]
MG
[pa.'ʔa]
PG
[pa.'ʔa]
PA
[pa.'ʔa]
SI
[pa.'ʔa]
FA
[pa.'ʔa]
Table 66. Forms for Paa ‘foot’ Figure 49. Map for Paa ‘foot’
For Paa ‘foot’, there are two forms and their difference is only on the position of the stress:
['paː.ʔa] and [pa.'ʔa]. The former is spoken from SP to MJ while the latter is spoken from MG to FA.
78
5.3. Nature
In this section, 31 different lexical items related to nature, e.g. animals, natural phenomena,
fruits and vegetables, will be presented with their corresponding term in each town. At the same
time, a map will be plotted to show the distribution of these lexical items.
Town Form
SP
[ʔa.lak.'dan]
RI [ʔa.lak.'dan],
[ʔa.lu.'piː.han]
NG [ʔu.la.'hiː.pan],
[ʔa.lak.'dan],
[ʔul.'jaː.ben]
LI
[ʔa.lu.'hiː.pan]
MJ [ʔa.lak.'dan]
[ʔa.lu.'piː.han]
[ʔu.la.'hiː.pan]
MG
[ʔa.lak.'dan]
PG
[ʔa.lak.'dan]
PA [ʔa.lak.'dan]
[ʔa.lu.'piː.han]
SI [ʔa.lak.'dan]
[ʔa.lu.'piː.han]
FA [ʔa.lak.'dan]
[ʔa.la.'hiː.pan] Figure 50. Map for Alakdan ‘scorpion’
Table 67. Forms for Alakdan ‘scorpion’
In reality, the only word for Alakdan ‘scorpion’ is [ʔa.lak.'dan]. The other forms listed here,
animals associated with the Alakdan ‘scorpion’. All of these supplementary forms except [ʔul.'jaː.ben]
mean ‘centipede’. The meaning of [ʔul.'jaː.ben] is still uncertain, the informant did not provide a
79
good description of this animal. All of the towns except LI showed [ʔa.lak.'dan] and many of the
towns use the term [ʔa.lu.'piː.han], namely RI, MJ, PA, and SI. Two of the towns, NG and MJ, prefer to
use [ʔu.la.'hiː.pan] while only LI uses [ʔa.lu.'hiː.pan]. The two remaining forms only showed in one
Town Form
SP
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
RI
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
NG
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
LI
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
MJ
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
MG
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
PG
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
PA
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
SI
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
FA
[ʔa.la.'maŋ]
Table 68. Forms for Alamang ‘small shrimp’ Figure 51. Map for Alamang ‘small shrimp’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ʔa.la.'maŋ].
80
5.3.3. Talangka ‘swamp crab’
Town Form
SP
[ka.'taŋ]
RI
[ka.'taŋ]
NG
[ka.'taŋ]
LI
[ka.'taŋ]
MJ
[ka.'taŋ]
MG
[ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]
PG
[ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]
PA
[ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]
SI
[ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]
FA
[ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]
Table 69. Forms for Talangka ‘swamp crab’ Figure 52. Map for Talangka ‘swamp crab’
For Talangka ‘swamp crab’, there are two forms: [ka.'taŋ] and [ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]. The former is spoken
81
5.3.4. Asung ulul ‘mad dog’
Town Form
SP [baŋ.'ʔaw]
RI [baŋ.'ʔaw]
NG ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
LI ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
MJ ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
MG [ʔu.'lul]
PG ['ʔaː.suŋ ʔu.'lul]
PA ['ʔaː.suŋ ba.'liw]
SI ['ʔaː.suŋ 'baː.liw]
FA ['ʔaː.suŋ 'baː.liw]
Table 70. Forms for Asung ulul ‘mad dog’ Figure 53. Map for Asung ulul ‘mad dog’
From SP to MJ, they use [baŋ.'ʔaw] to describe a mad dog. If you would go to MG and PG, a
different term is used: [ʔu.'lul]. Going further north, PA prefers the term [ba.'liw] while the stress of
82
5.3.5. Bahaghari ‘rainbow’
Town Form
SP
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
RI
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
NG
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
LI
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
MJ
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
MG
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
PG
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
PA
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
SI
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
FA
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
Table 71. Forms for Bahaghari ‘rainbow’ Figure 54. Map for Bahaghari ‘rainbow’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ba.hag.'haː.riʔ].
83
5.3.6. Bangaw ‘fly’
Town Form
SP
[baŋ.'jaw]
RI
[baŋ.'jaw]
NG
[baŋ.'jaw]
LI
[baŋ.'jaw]
MJ
[baŋ.'jaw]
MG
[baŋ.'jaw]
PG
['baː.ŋaw]
PA
['baː.ŋaw]
SI
['baː.ŋaw]
FA
['baː.ŋaw]
Table 72. Forms for Bangaw ‘fly’ Figure 55. Map for Bangaw ‘fly’
For Bangaw ‘fly’, there are two forms: [baŋ.'jaw] and ['baː.ŋaw]. The former is spoken from SP to
84
5.3.7. Biik ‘piglet’
Town Form
SP
[bi.'ʔik]
RI
[bi.'ʔek] [bu.'law] [ku.'leg]
NG
['biː.ʔik] [ku.'leg]
LI
[bi.'ʔek] [ku.'leg]
MJ
['biː.ʔik] [ku.'lig]
MG
['biː.ʔik] [ku.'lig]
PG
['biː.ʔik] [ku.'leg]
PA
[bi.'ʔik] [ku.'lig]
SI
[bi.'ʔik] [ku.'lig]
FA
[ku.'lig]
Table 73. Forms for Biik ‘piglet’ Figure 56. Map for Biik ‘piglet’
With regards to the offspring of pig, it seems that there are various ways to call it. First, in SP,
PA and SI, it is called [bi.'ʔik] while this form is [bi.'ʔek] in RI and LI and ['biː.ʔik] in NG, MJ, MG,
and PG. Meanwhile, [ku.'leg] is used in RI, NG, LI, and PG and [ku.'lig] is heard MJ, MG, PA, SI and
FA. Most of the informants insist that there is no difference between biik and kulig while the
informant from FA said that kulig usually refers to the recently-born or a very young piglet. In RI,
85
5.3.8. Buko ‘coconut’
Town Form
SP
['muː.raʔ]
RI
['muː.raʔ]
NG
['muː.raʔ]
LI
['muː.raʔ]
MJ
['muː.raʔ]
MG
['muː.raʔ]
PG
['muː.raʔ]
PA
['muː.raʔ]
SI
['muː.raʔ]
FA
['muː.raʔ]
Table 74. Forms for Buko ‘coconut’ Figure 57. Map for Buko ‘coconut’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
['muː.raʔ]. Some informants remarked that their native term for coconut is ['muː.raʔ] and not buko
86
5.3.9. Kalamansi ‘calamansi’
Town Form
SP
[ka.la.man.'siʔ]
RI [ka.li.mun.'diŋ]
[sin.'tuː.nes]
NG
[sin.'tuː.nes]
LI
[sin.'tuː.nes]
MJ
[sin.'tuː.nes]
MG
[sen.'tuː.nes]
PG
[ka.la.man.'siʔ]
PA
[sin.'tuː.nes]
SI
[sin.'tuː.nes]
FA
[sin.'tuː.nes]
Table 75. Forms for Kalamansi ‘ calamansi’ Figure 58. Map for Kalamansi ‘ calamansi’
For Kalamansi ‘ calamansi’, there are four forms. First, [sin.'tuː.nes] is spoken in FA, SI, PA, MJ, LI,
NG, and RI. Second, [ka.la.man.'siʔ] is heard in SP and PG. Lastly, MG uses [sen.'tuː.nes] and RI
[ka.li.mun.'diŋ]. Most of the informants remarked that when they were younger, they called calamansi
as sintunes back then but now, because of the influence of Tagalog Manila, they are now getting used
to call it calamansi.
87
5.3.10. Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’
Town Form
SP
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
RI
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
NG
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
LI
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
MJ
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
MG
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
PG
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
PA
[ba.liŋ.'hoj]
SI
[ka.'moː.teŋ 'kaː.hoj]
FA
[ka.'moː.teŋ 'kaː.hoj]
Table 76. Forms for Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’ Figure 59. Map for Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’
For Kamoteng Kahoy ‘cassava’, there are two forms: [ba.liŋ.'hoj] and [ka.'moː.teŋ 'kaː.hoj]. The
88
5.3.11. Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’
Town Form
SP
[ban.'law]
RI
[ban.'law]
NG
[ba.'hog], [ban.'law]
LI
[ba.'hog]
MJ
[li.'noʔ]
MG
[li.'noʔ]
PG
[li.'noʔ]
PA
[li.'noʔ]
SI
[li.'noʔ], [hi.'nuː.gas]
FA
[li.'noʔ]
Table 77. Forms for Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’ Figure 60. Map for Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’
For Kanimbabuy ‘feed for pigs’, which is a mixture made up of left-overs to be used as fed for
pigs, four forms have been found among the ten towns. These words are [li.'noʔ], [ban.'law],
[ba.'hog], and [hi.'nuː.gas]. From SP to NG, [ban.'law] is used while also from NG to neighboring
town LI, [ba.'hog] is also spoken. Meanwhile, MJ, NG, PG, PA, SI and FA use the form [li.'noʔ]. In
89
5.3.12. Kopra ‘dried coconut meat’
Town Form
SP
[ka.lib.'kib]
RI
[ka.lib.'kib]
NG
[ka.lib.'kib]
LI
[ka.lib.'kib]
MJ
[ka.lib.'kib]
MG
[ka.lib.'kib]
PG
['kop.ras]
PA
['kop.ras]
SI
['kop.ras]
FA
['kop.ras]
Table 78. Forms forKopra ‘dried coconut meat’ Figure 61. Map for Kopra ‘dried coconut meat’
For Kopra ‘dried coconut meat’, there are two forms: [ka.lib.'kib] and ['kop.ras]. The former is
90
5.3.13. Gagamba ‘spider’
Town Form
SP
[ga.gam.'ba]
RI
[ga.gam.'ba]
NG
[ga.gam.'ba]
LI
[ga.gam.'ba]
MJ
[ga.gam.'ba]
MG
[ga.gam.'ba]
PG
[ga.gam.'ba]
PA
[ga.gam.'ba]
SI
[ga.gam.'ba]
FA
[ga.gam.'ba]
Table 79. Forms for Gagamba ‘spider’ Figure 62. Map for Gagamba ‘spider’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ga.gam.'ba].
91
5.3.14. Hanip ‘chicken louse’
Town Form
SP
['haː.nip]
RI
['ʔaː.nep]
NG
['haː.nip]
LI
['haː.nep]
MJ
['haː.nip]
MG
['haː.nip]
PG
['haː.nip]
PA
['haː.nip]
SI
['haː.nip]
FA
['haː.nip]
Table 80. Forms for Hanip ‘chicken louse’ Figure 63. Map for Hanip ‘chicken louse’
Besides RI and LI, all of the towns use ['haː.nip] for Hanip ‘chicken louse’. Speakers from RI use
92
5.3.15. Ipis ‘cockroach
Town Form
SP
['ʔiː.pis] [baŋ.'kuː.kaŋ]
RI
[baŋ.'kuː.kaŋ]
NG
[baŋ.'kuː.kaŋ]
LI
[baŋ.'kuː.kaŋ]
MJ
['ʔiː.pis] [baŋ.'kuː.kaŋ]
MG
['ʔiː.pis]
PG
['ʔiː.pis]
PA
['ʔiː.pis]
SI
['ʔiː.pis]
FA
['ʔiː.pis]
Table 81. Forms for Ipis ‘cockroach Figure 64. Map for Ipis ‘cockroach’
RI, NG, and LI, use the term [baŋ.'kuː.kaŋ] for Ipis ‘cockroach while in MG, PG, PA, SI, and FA,
they use ['ʔiː.pis]. On the other hand, SP and MJ both use the two forms.
93
5.3.16. Langgam ‘ant’
Town Form
SP
['guː.jam], [ʔa.'paː.nas],['kwiː.tib]
RI
['kwiː.tib], [ʔu.'lan.des]
NG ['kwiː.tib] [ʔa.'paː.nas] [ʔu.'lan.des]
['guː.jam] [ʔa.mi.'niː.ŋas]
LI
['kwiː.tib]
MJ
['kwiː.tib]
MG ['kwiː.tib] [han.'tek]
['guː.jam],[ʔa.'paː.nas],
PG
[ʔa.'paː.nas], [han.'tek]
PA
['guː.jam]
SI
[han.'tik], ['kwiː.tib],[ʔa.'paː.nas]
FA
[ti.'gaː.saw] [han.'tik 'baː.ga]
Table 82. Forms for Langgam ‘ant’ Figure 65. Map for Langgam ‘ant’
Perhaps, in this research, Langgam ‘ant’ has the most number of forms among the ten towns. All
in all, there are nine forms: ['kwiː.tib], [ʔa.'paː.nas], ['guː.jam], [ʔu.'lan.des], [ʔa.mi.'niː.ŋas],
The ['kwiː.tib] are small ants. This is used in SP, RI, NG, LI, MJ, MG, and SI. The ant in lanzones is
called [ʔa.'paː.nas] and this is heard in SP, NG, MG, PG, and SI. ['guː.jam], meanwhile, is used in SP,
NG, MG, PA, and is a generic term for small ants. [ʔu.'lan.des] are red ants and this term is spoken in
RI, and NG. In NG, another species of ant is called [ʔa.mi.'niː.ŋas] and the NG informant claimed that
this is called [ʔa.mi.'nig.tas] in other towns but this word did not show up during the field work in
other towns. [han.'tek] which is spoken in MG and PG and [han.'tik] which is spoken in SI only have
a difference in one vowel. In FA, there are another species of ant called [ti.'gaː.saw] and [han.'tik
'baː.ga].
94
5.3.17. Munggo ‘mung beans’
Town Form
SP
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
RI
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
NG
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
LI
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
MJ
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
MG
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
PG
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
PA
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
SI
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
FA
[ba.'laː.toŋ]
Table 83. Forms for Munggo ‘mung beans’ Figure 66. Map for Munggo ‘mung beans’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ba.'laː.toŋ]. Informants say that munggo and [ba.'laː.toŋ] are not the same thing. For them, the mung
beans used for cooking is [ba.'laː.toŋ] while the mung beans added in halu-halo is munggo.
95
5.3.18. Paniki ‘bat’
Town Form
SP
[pa.'niː.kiʔ] [ba.'jaː.kan] [ka.'bag]
RI
[ka.'bag]
NG
[ka.'bag] [pa.'niː.keʔ]
LI
[pa.'niː.kiʔ] [ka.'bag]
MJ
[ka.'bag]
MG
[ka.'bag]
PG
[pa.'niː.kiʔ]
PA
[pa.'niː.kiʔ]
SI
[pa.'niː.kiʔ]
FA
[ka.'bag]
Table 84. Forms for Paniki ‘bat’ Figure 67. Map for Paniki ‘bat’
For Paniki ‘bat’, there are 4 forms. [pa.'niː.kiʔ], [pa.'niː.keʔ], [ka.'bag], and [ba.'jaː.kan]. [pa.'niː.kiʔ]
is spoken in SP, LI, PG, PA, and SI while [pa.'niː.keʔ] is only heard in NG. [ka.'bag] is a species of
fruit-bat and this is used in SP, RI, NG, LI, MJ, MG, and FA. SP speakers are also familiar with
96
5.3.19. Saput ‘cobweb’
Town Form
SP
['saː.put]
RI
['saː.put]
NG
['saː.put]
LI
['saː.put]
MJ
['saː.put]
MG
['saː.put]
PG
['saː.put]
PA
['saː.put]
SI
['saː.put]
FA
['saː.put]
Table 85. Forms for Saput ‘cobweb’ Figure 68. Map for Saput ‘cobweb’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
['saː.put].
97
5.3.20. Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’
Town Form
SP
[ka.la.'mis.mis]
RI
-----------------
NG
[ka.la.'mis.mis]
LI
-----------------
MJ
[si.ga.'ril.jas]
MG
[si.ga.'ril.jas]
PG
[si.ga.'ril.jas]
PA
[ka.'baj ka.'baj]
SI
[si.ga.'ril.jas]
FA
[si.gi.'dil.jas]
Table 86. Forms for Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’ Figure 69. Map for Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’
SP and RI use the term [ka.la.'mis.mis] to identify Sigarilyas ‘winged bean’ while PA use [ka.'baj
ka.'baj]. [si.ga.'ril.jas] is spoken in MJ, MG, PG, and SI while its variant form, [si.gi.'dil.jas] is used in
FA.
98
5.3.21. Sitaw ‘string beans’
Town Form
SP
['siː.taw]
RI
['siː.taw]
NG
['siː.taw] ['ʔaː.jap]
LI
['ʔaː.jap] [pa.'ʔaː.jap]
MJ
['ʔaː.jap]
MG
['ʔaː.jap]
PG
['ʔaː.jap]
PA
['ʔaː.jap]
SI
['ʔaː.jap]
FA
[per.'suː.lis]
Table 87. Forms for Sitaw ‘string beans’ Figure 70. Map for Sitaw ‘string beans’
For Sitaw ‘string beans’, there are also four terms. These are ['ʔaː.jap], [pa.'ʔaː.jap], ['siː.taw], and
[per.'suː.lis]. ['ʔaː.jap] is the most widely-spoken in all of the forms and it is used in NG, LI, MJ, MG,
PG, PA, and SI. Its variant form, [pa.'ʔaː.jap], is also used by speakers from LI. ['siː.taw] is spoken in
three towns: SP, RI, and NG. Lastly, only in FA they say [per.'suː.lis].
99
5.3.22. Tuta ‘puppy’
Town Form
SP
[bi.'lot]
RI
[bi.'lot]
NG
['tuː.taʔ]
LI
['tuː.taʔ]
MJ
['tuː.taʔ]
MG
['tuː.taʔ]
PG
['tuː.taʔ]
PA
['tuː.taʔ]
SI
['tuː.taʔ]
FA
['tuː.taʔ]
Table 88. Forms for Tuta ‘puppy’ Figure 71. Map for Tuta ‘puppy’
For Tuta ‘puppy’, there are two forms found: ['tuː.taʔ] and [bi.'lot]. ['tuː.taʔ] is used from FA
down to NG. [bi.'lot] is what you call a new-born puppy and this is spoken in SP and RI.
100
5.3.23. Ulap ‘cloud’
Town Form
SP
[ʔa.la.'paː.ʔap]
RI
[ʔa.la.'paː.ʔap]
NG
['ʔuː.lap] [ʔa.la.'paː.ʔap]
LI
['ʔuː.lap]
MJ
['ʔuː.lap]
MG
[ʔa.la.'paː.ʔap]
PG
['ʔuː.lap]
PA
['ʔuː.lap]
SI
['ʔuː.lap]
FA
['ʔuː.lap]
Table 89. Forms for Ulap ‘cloud’ Figure 72. Map for Ulap ‘cloud’
['ʔuː.lap] and [ʔa.la.'paː.ʔap] are both used in Laguna to refer to Ulap ‘cloud’. The former is
spoken in NG, LI, MJ, PG, PA, SI, and FA. The latter is heard at SP, SI, NG, and MG.
101
5.3.24. Ambon ‘drizzle’
Town Form
SP
['ʔam.bon]
RI
['ʔam.bon]
NG
['ʔam.bon]
LI
['ʔam.bon]
MJ
['ʔam.bon]
MG
['ʔam.bon]
PG
['ʔam.bon]
PA
['ʔam.bon]
SI
['ʔam.bon]
FA
['ʔam.bon]
Table 90. Forms for Ambon ‘drizzle’ Figure 73. Map for Ambon ‘drizzle’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
['ʔam.bon].
102
5.3.25. Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’
Town Form
SP [ʔam.'piː.jas]
RI [ʔam.'piː.jas]
NG [ʔam.'piː.jas]
LI [ʔam.'piː.jas]
MJ [ʔam.'piː.jas]
MG [ʔam.'pjas]
PG [ʔam.'pjas]
PA [ʔam.'piː.jas]
SI [ʔam.'piː.jas]
FA [ʔam.'piː.jas]
Table 91. Forms for Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’ Figure 74. Map for Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’
For Anggi ‘'rain getting inside’, there are also two forms. [ʔam.'piː.jas] is heard throughout the
ten towns except in MG and PG where the variant form, [ʔam.'pjas], is used.
103
5.3.26. Tahol ‘to bark’
Town Form
SP
[ba.'tok] [ka.'hol]
RI
[ba.'tok] [ka.'hol]
NG
[ba.'tok]
LI
[ba.'tok]
MJ
[ba.'tok] [ta.'hol]
MG
[ta.'hol] [ka.'hol]
PG
[ta.'hol] [ka.'hol]
PA
[ta.'hol]
SI
[ta.'hol]
FA
[ta.'hol]
Table 92. Forms for Tahol ‘to bark’ Figure 75. Map for Tahol ‘to bark’
Among the ten towns, the forms for Tahol ‘to bark’ are [ba.'tok], [ta.'hol], and [ka.'hol]. From SP
to MJ, [ba.'tok] is used while from MJ to FA, [ta.'hol]. The distribution of [ka.'hol] is very scattered. It
104
5.3.27. Maligamgam ‘lukewarm’
Town Form
SP
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
RI
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
NG
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
LI
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
MJ
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
MG
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
PG
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
PA
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
SI
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
FA
[ma.li.'gam.gam]
Table 93. Forms for Maligamgam ‘lukewarm’ Figure 76. Map for Maligamgam ‘lukewarm’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[ma.li.'gam.gam].
105
5.3.28. Suha ‘grapefruit’
Town Form
SP
[luk.'ban]
RI
[luk.'ban]
NG
[luk.'ban]
LI
[luk.'ban]
MJ
[luk.'ban]
MG
[luk.'ban]
PG
[luk.'ban]
PA
[luk.'ban]
SI
[luk.'ban]
FA
[luk.'ban]
Table 94. Forms for Suha ‘grapefruit’ Figure 77. Map for Suha ‘grapefruit’
In this case, all of the towns are the same. From SP to FA, only one form is observed:
[luk.'ban].
106
5.3.29. Paru-paro ‘butterfly’
Town Form
SP
[pa.'ru pa.'ro]
RI
[pa.'la pa.'la]
NG
[pa.'la pa.'la]
LI
[pa.'la pa.'la]
MJ
[pa.'ru pa.'ro]
MG
[pa.'ru pa.'ro]
PG
[pa.'ru pa.'ro] [ma.ri.'poː.sa]
PA
[pa.'ru pa.'ro]
SI
[pa.'ru pa.'ro]
FA
[pa.'ru pa.'ro]
Table 95. Forms for Paru-paro ‘butterfly’ Figure 78. Map for Paru-paro ‘butterfly’
[pa.'ru pa.'ro] is spoken in the most number of towns: SP, MJ, MG, PG, PA, SI and FA. Meanwhile,
RI, NG, and LI, which are very close to each other, use the term [pa.'la pa.'la]. They say that this is
what they call the big butterfly that according to belief signifies death. In PG, a big butterfly is also
called a [ma.ri.'poː.sa].
107
5.3.30. Hamog ‘fog’
Town Form
SP
[ha.'mog]
RI
['ʔaː.bo 'ʔaː.bo]
NG
['ʔaː.bo 'ʔaː.bo]
LI
[ha.'mog]
MJ
['ʔaː.bo 'ʔaː.bo]
MG
[ha.'mog]
PG
[ha.'mog]
PA
[ha.'mog]
SI
[ha.'mog]
FA
[ha.'mog]
Table 96. Forms for Hamog ‘fog’ Figure 79. Map for Hamog ‘fog’
Seven (SP, LI, MG, PG, PA, SI, FA) out of the ten towns use [ha.'mog] to name Hamog ‘fog’. On
the other hand, ['ʔaː.bo 'ʔaː.bo] is the preferred term for those who hail from RI, NG, and MJ.
108
5.3.31. Buto ‘bone, seed’
Town Form
SP [bu.'to]
RI [but.'ʔo]
NG [bu.'to]
LI [but.'ʔo]
MJ [bu.'to]
MG [bu.'to]
PG [bu.'to]
PA [bu.'to]
SI [bu.'to]
FA [bu.'to]
Table 97. Forms for Buto ‘bone, seed’ Figure 80. Map for Buto ‘bone, seed’
For Buto ‘bone, seed’, only RI and LI retain the glottal stop, as in [but.'ʔo]. The other towns,
109
5.3.32. Buwan ‘moon, month’
Town Form
SP [bu.'wan]
RI ['buː.wan]
NG ['buː.wan]
LI ['buː.wan]
MJ ['buː.wan]
MG [bu.'wan]
PG [bu.'wan]
PA [bu.'wan]
SI ['buː.wan]
FA [bu.'wan]
Table 98. Forms for Buwan ‘moon, month’ Figure 81. Map for Buwan ‘moon, month’
For Buwan ‘moon, month’, there are two forms: [bu.'wan] and ['buː.wan]. The former is spoken
in SP, MG, PG, PA, and FA while latter is spoken in RI, NG, LI, MJ, and SI.
110
5.4. Sets of Isogloss
From the preceding section, it could be seen that variation really exists among these ten towns
in Laguna. Sometimes, all of them have the same form, while, sometimes, almost every town uses a
different term. However, there are some instances that different lexical items show the same flow of
distribution among the ten towns. Based on the data presented above, there are five sets of isogloss
that can be seen. Each of this set will be discussed below one by one.
As a whole, these ten towns share a lot of common terms with each other. From all of the data
presented above, this pattern is present in 15 lexical items. These are Panga ‘jaw’ (Section 5.2.4.),
Baba ‘chin’ (Section 5.2.6.), Balakang ‘hip’ (Section 5.2.7.), Balinguynguy ‘nosebleed’ (Section
5.2.15.), Pusod ‘belly button' (Section 5.2.24.), Batok ‘nape’ (Section 5.2.26.), Tuhod ‘knee’ (Section
5.2.29.), Bahaghari ‘rainbow’ (Section 5.3.5.), Buko ‘coconut’ (Section 5.3.8.), Gagamba ‘spider’
(Section 5.3.13.), Saput ‘cobweb’ (Section 5.3.19.), Ambon ‘drizzle’ (Section 5.3.24.), Maligamgam
111
5.4.2. Isogloss Set 2: One form in SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ and another form in MG-PG-PA-SI-FA
For Isogloss Set 2, it could be seen that the first two five towns (SP, RI, NG, LI, and MJ) are much
closer to each other and the other five (MG, PG, PA, SI, and FA) are similar with each other. This
distribution is seen in five lexical items. These lexical items are Paa ‘foot’ (Section 5.2.35.), Talangka
‘swamp crab’ (Section 5.3.3.), Asung ulul ‘mad dog’ (Section 5.3.4.), Ipis ‘cockroach (Section 5.3.15.),
5.4.3. Isogloss Set 3: One form in SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ-MG and another form in PG-PA-SI-FA
112
For this set of isogloss, there are only two lexical items that exhibit this pattern. The division
between SP-RI-NG-LI-MJ-MG and PG-PA-SI-FA is only in Bangaw ‘fly’ (Section 5.3.6.) and Kopra
5.4.4. Isogloss Set 4: One form in SI and another form in all the other towns
There are two lexical items that show that SI have unique forms only used in their town. These
two lexical items are related to kinship. These are Kuya ‘older brother’ (Section 5.1.5.) and Ate ‘older
Figure 85. Isogloss Set 4: 1 form in SI and another form in all the other towns
113
5.4.5. Isogloss Set 5: One form in RI and another form in all the other towns
Figure 86. Isogloss Set 5: 1 form in RI and another form in all the other towns
There are also two instances that all except RI had the same form. These are Bukung-bukong
Below is a map of all the five sets of isogloss that divide the ten towns. In MG and PG exists two
sets of isogloss that are very close to each other while the other two sets, in SI and RI, are very far
114
5.5. Lexical Similarity Percentage
The forms presented in this chapter were also input in a software called Cog that can identify
cognates and compute for the lexical similarity of different varieties of a language. Another feature
of this software is it is able to generate a graph to illustrate the relationship of different varieties
based on cognate percentage. The results of the computation of cognate percentage based on lexicon
SP RI NG LI MJ MG PG PA SI FA
SP 95 85 82 92 88 96 88 86 92
RI 95 92 88 96 89 95 91 94 100
NG 85 92 93 89 85 85 79 80 81
LI 82 88 93 92 95 91 88 90 91
MJ 92 96 89 92 96 100 89 91 92
MG 88 89 85 95 96 96 85 87 88
PG 96 95 85 91 100 96 93 92 92
PA 88 91 79 88 89 85 93 85 86
SI 86 94 80 90 91 87 92 85 100
FA 92 100 81 91 92 88 92 86 100
Based from the table above, it proves that all of these varieties are still dialects of one language.
It is true that 80%-100% is the margin for telling whether a certain variety is still a dialect of a
language or not and on the table, a percentage lower than 80% can still be found, e.g. PA-NG which
is 79%. But this is statistically significant and speakers from these towns could still be able to
understand each other. Lexically speaking, of all the towns, NG shows the lowest percentage of
lexical similarity with other towns. From MJ to FA, all of the percentages of NG are lower than 90%
percent. Following NG is PA which has 79% to 93% lexical similarity with other towns. Meanwhile,
115
one of the most lexically-similar varieties are SI-RI-FA and PG-MJ which have 100% lexical
Figure 88. Graph of the Relationship of Ten Towns in Laguna Based on Lexical Similarity
5.6. Summary
The lexical similarities and differences of the ten towns in Laguna have been shown in this
chapter. 75 lexical items were categorized into three semantic domains: kinship, body, and nature.
The elicited forms in each lexical item per town were compared with each other and plotted in a
map to illustrate the distribution of these forms. From this, there are five sets of isogloss that could
be derived and these sets of isogloss were compiled into one bundle of isogloss. Using a computer
software, the lexical similarity percentage was computed and it showed that NG and PA have one of
the lowest percentage of lexical similarity with other towns while SI-RI-FA and PG-MJ are found to
116
Conclusion
This research aims to describe the Tagalog language as it is spoken in the province of Laguna.
Ten towns were chosen to be the focus of this study and the data were gathered first-hand through
field work and by using a word list especially created for this study. The data collected were first
compared with Tagalog Manila in the aspects of phonology and morphosyntax to prove that this
variety is indeed a legitimate variety on its own. After establishing this, the towns were compared
among themselves to find out in what aspects of phonology and lexicon do they differ or become
similar. The variation and similarity among the varieties became more apparent when the forms of
each town were plotted in a map, sets of isogloss were drawn and similarity percentages were
computed. Since the amount of data present in this study is fairly low in number, the researcher
advises the readers to be cautious of the results presented here since the implications made in this
study only apply to the data that were utilized in this study. Nevertheless, all of these ten varieties
can still be considered dialects of one language but each one of them has its own unique
characteristics that deserve the attention and interest of linguists and of the general scientific
community as well.
Since this is just a preliminary study of Tagalog Laguna, it certainly has its shortcomings but it
is hoped that it will still be useful for other linguists and speakers of Tagalog, especially of Tagalog
Laguna, to learn more about Tagalog Laguna and appreciate its distinctiveness from other Tagalog
varieties. Since some of the data presented here are also attested in other parts of Southern Luzon, a
bigger dialectology study of Southern Tagalog covering other parts of Laguna and of Southern
Luzon is encouraged to fully understand the linguistic situation in the area and to possibly trace the
117
References
Abella, A. G. (2012). The Tagalog variety of Nueva Ecija. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis).
Bloomfield, L. (1917). Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis (Vol. III, No.2). Illinois: University of
Illinois.
Blust, R. (1991). The greater central Philippines hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics, 30(2), 73-129.
Chambers, J., & Trudgill, P. (2004). Dialectology (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cunanan, F. (2015). Ang dialect area ng Bicol Sorsogon: Isang paunang-suri. Daluyan: Journal ng
Ethnologue. (2016). Tagalog. (M. P. Lewis, Ed.) Retrieved from Ethnologue: Languages of the World:
http://www.ethnologue.com/language/tgl
Fund for Assistance to Private Education. (1975). The Philippine atlas (Vol. I). Manila: Fund for
Katigbak, L. C. (2014). “Ala eh”: An exploratory study on the intonational structure of Batangas
Quezon City.
Lopez, C. (1970). The Boac Tagalog in the island of Marinduque. Quezon City: University of the
Philippines-Diliman.
Co.
Paz, C. J. (1994). Isang preliminaryong pag-aaral ng Tagalog sa Rizal. The Archive, 10. Quezon City:
Cecilio Lopez Archives of Philippine Languages and the Philippine Linguistics Circle.
_______. (1994) Ay hao: Ang dayalek ng Tagalog sa Rizal. The Archive,10. Quezon City: Cecilio
118
Lopez Archives of Philippine Languages and the Philippine Linguistics Circle.
Peneyra, I. (2003). Isang rekonstraksyong internal ng Tagalog batay sa mga piling dayalek.
City.
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2016, May 19). Highlights of the Philippine population: 2015
https://psa.gov.ph/content/highlights-philippine-population-2015-census-population
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2016, June 2). Population of Region IV-A - CALABARZON (Based on
Laguna: http://www.laguna.gov.ph/province/province
Provincial Government of Laguna. (2015). Province profile. Retrieved from Provincial Government
of Laguna: http://www.laguna.gov.ph/province/province-profile
Soberano, R. P. (1977). The dialects of Marinduque Tagalog. Studies in Philippine Linguistics 1(1),
53-74.
Contemporary Linguistics (6th Ed.) (pp. 287-317). Ontario: Pearson Education Canada
Inc.
Schachter, P. and Otanes, F. (1972). Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Tantiangco, CMK, et al. 2009. Acoustic correlates of stress. Unpublished manuscript, Department of
119
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Laguna_Map.jpg
120
Filipino/English Gloss
Katawan 'body'
Tenga 'ear'
Leeg 'neck'
Panga 'jaw'
Bagang 'molars'
Alakdan 'scorpion'
Alamang 'small shrimp'
Alkansya 'piggy bank'
Talangka 'swamp crab'
Asung ulul 'mad dog'
Baba 'chin'
Bahaghari 'rainbow'
Balakang 'hip'
Balakubak 'dandruff'
Bangaw 'large fly'
Biik 'piglet'
Biluy 'dimple'
Buko 'coconut'
Bukung-bukong 'ankle'
Kaing 'big basket'
Kalamansi 'calamansi'
Kamoteng Kahoy 'cassava root'
Kanimbabuy 'feed for pigs'
Kopra 'dried coconut meat'
Gagamba 'spider'
Gilagid 'gums'
Hanip 'chicken louse'
Ipis 'cockroach'
Lalamunan 'throat'
Langgam 'ant'
Munggo 'mung beans'
Paminggalan 'dish rack'
Paniki 'bat'
Saput 'cobweb'
Sigarilyas 'winged bean'
Sinat 'mild fever'
Binat 'relapse of (an ailment)
Sinungaling 'liar'
Sitaw 'string beans'
Tirador 'slingshot'
Tuta 'puppy'
Ulap 'cloud'
Ambon 'drizzle'
Anggi 'rain getting inside'
Balatan 'peel'
Balinguynguy 'nosebleed'
Banli 'scald'
Kiliti 'tickle'
Hikab 'yawn'
Hilo 'dizzy'
Hiwa 'to slice'
Igib 'to fetch water'
Nabulunan 'to choke food'
Nginig 'to tremble'
Salampak 'to sit on the floor'
Tahol 'to bark'
Bungi 'with missing tooth'
Lukot 'crimpled'
Maligamgam 'lukewarm'
Maalinsangan 'warm and humid'
Malata 'soft (as of rice)'
Manipis 'thin'
Mapanghi 'smell of urine'
Mapurol 'not sharp'
Madamot 'selfish'
Pangit 'ugly'
Unti-unti 'little by little'
Alikabok 'dust'
Tagyawat 'pimple'
Pusod 'belly button'
Kunyari 'for example'
Dausos
Kabit 'mistress'
Dito 'here'
Diyan 'there'
Doon 'over there'
Ganito 'like this'
Ganiyan 'like that'
Ganoon 'like that'
Ito 'this'
Lolo 'grandfather'
Lola 'grandmother'
Ama 'father'
Ina 'mother'
Kuya 'older brother'
Ate 'older sister'
Tito 'uncle'
Tita 'aunt'
Noo 'forehead'
Batok 'nape'
Tiyan 'stomach'
Likod 'back'
Tuhod 'knee'
Matakaw 'glutton'
Mayabang 'boastful'
Imis 'arrange'
Tig-iisa 'by ones'
Tigdadalawa 'by twos'
Tigtatatlo 'by threes'
Tigaapat 'by fours'
[ʔu.la.'hiː.pan], [ʔa.lak.'dan],
Alakdan 'scorpion' [ʔa.lak.'dan] [ʔa.lak.'dan], [ʔa.lu.'piː.han] [ʔul.'jaː.ben]
Alamang 'small shrimp' [ʔa.la.'maŋ] [ʔa.la.'maŋ] [ʔa.la.'maŋ]
Alkansya 'piggy bank' [ʔal.kan.'ʃa] [ʔal.kan.'ʃa] [ʔal.kan.'sʃa]
Talangka 'swamp crab' [ka.'taŋ] [ka.'taŋ] [ka.'taŋ]
Asung ulul 'mad dog' [baŋ.'ʔaw] [baŋ.'ʔaw] ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw]
Baba 'chin' ['baː.baʔ] ['baː.baʔ] ['baː.baʔ]
Bahaghari 'rainbow' [ba.hag.'haː.riʔ] [ba.hag.'haː.riʔ] [ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
Balakang 'hip' [ba.la.'kaŋ] [ba.la.'kaŋ] [ba.la.'kaŋ]
Balakubak 'dandruff' [ba.la.'kuː.bak] [ba.la.'kuː.bak] [ba.la.'kuː.bak]
Bangaw 'large fly' [baŋ.'jaw] [baŋ.'jaw] [baŋ.'jaw]
['kwiː.tib], [ʔa.'paː.nas],
['guː.jam], [ʔu.'lan.des], ['guː.jam],
Langgam 'ant' [ʔa.'paː.nas],['kwiː.tib] ['kwiː.tib], [ʔu.'lan.des] [ʔa.mi.'niː.ŋas]
Munggo 'mung beans' [ba.'laː.toŋ] [ba.'laː.toŋ] [ba.'laː.toŋ]
[pa.'niː.kiʔ],
Paniki 'bat' [ba.'jaː.kan], [ka.'bag] [ka.'bag] [ka.'bag], [pa.'niː.keʔ]
Saput 'cobweb' ['saː.put] ['saː.put] ['saː.put]
Sigarilyas 'winged bean' [ka.la.'mis.mis] [ka.la.'mis.mis]
Sinat 'mild fever' ['siː.nat] ['sej.nat] ['siː.nat]
Binat 'relapse of (an ailment) ['biː.nat] ['bej.nat] ['baj.nat]
[ka.'bet], [na.'ŋaː.ŋa.lun.jaʔ],
[ka.la.'guː.joʔ], [ka.'bet], [ka.ʔa.ʔa.'guː.loʔ],
Kabit 'mistress' [na.'ŋaː.ŋa.lun.jaʔ] [ka.'bet], [ki.'riː.da] [ka.la.'guː.joʔ]
Dito 'here' ['diː.ne] ['diː.ne] ['diː.ne]
Diyan 'there' ['diː.jan]
Doon 'over there' [du.'ʔon] [du.'ʔon]
Ganito 'like this' [ga.ni.'re] [ga.na.'re] [ga.ni.'re]
Ganiyan 'like that' [gan.'jan] ['gan.jan]
Ganoon 'like that' [gan.'jon] [ga.nu.'ʔon]
Ito 'this' [ʔa.'re] [ʔa.'re]
Lolo 'grandfather' ['loː.lo] [ʔan.'daʔ], ['maː.maj] ['loː.lo]
Lola 'grandmother' ['loː.la] [ʔan.'daʔ], ['naː.naj] ['loː.la]
Ama 'father' ['taː.taj] [ʔa.'ma], [iʔ.'taj] ['taː.taj] ['taː.taj]
Ina 'mother' [ʔi.'naj] [ʔi.'na], ['naː.naj], [ʔi.'naj] ['naː.naj]
Kuya 'older brother' ['kuː.ja] ['kuː.ja] ['kuː.ja]
Ate 'older sister' ['ʔaː.te] ['ʔaː.te] ['ʔaː.te]
Tito 'uncle' ['tiː.jo] ['tiː.jo], [a.ma.'ʔiŋ] ['tiː.jo]
Tita 'aunt' ['tiː.ja] ['tiː.ja], [tʃaŋ], [da.'gaː.hin] ['tiː.ja]
Noo 'forehead' ['nuː.ʔo] ['nuː.ʔo] ['nuː.ʔo]
Batok 'nape' ['baː.tok] ['baː.tok] ['baː.tok]
Tiyan 'stomach' [tʃan] [ti.'jan] ['tiː.jan]
Likod 'back' [li.'kud] [li.'kud] [li.'kod]
Tuhod 'knee' ['tuː.hod] ['tuː.hod] ['tuː.hod]
[ma.'taː.kaw],
Matakaw 'glutton' [ma.'siː.baʔ] [ma.'taː.kaw] [ma.'taː.kaw], [ma.'siː.baʔ]
[ma.'jaː.baŋ], [pa.'laː.lo],
Mayabang 'boastful' [ham.'bog] [ma.'jaː.baŋ], [ham.'bog] [ma.'jaː.baŋ]
Imis 'arrange' ['ʔiː.mis] ['ʔiː.mis], [pi.'jal] ['ʔiː.mis]
Tig-iisa 'by ones' [ti.gi.ti.'giː.sa] [ti.gi.'giː.sa] [tig.ʔi.'ʔi.sa] [ti.gi.ti.'giː.sa]
[ti.'gal.wa], [ti.ga.ti.'gal.wa],
Tigdadalawa 'by twos' [ti.ga.ti.'gaː.la.wa] [ti.ga.'gal.wa] [tig.ga.'gal.wa]
Tigtatatlo 'by threes' [ti.ga.ti.'gat.lo] [ti.ga.'gat.lo]
Tigaapat 'by fours' [ti.ga.ti.'gaː.pat] [ti.ga.'gaː.pat]
Ligpit 'to clean the table (as in after eating)' ['ʔiː.mis] [sim.'pan], ['ʔiː.mis] [ʔi.'him.pil], [ʔi.'lig.pit]
Samsam 'to get the laundry' ['sam.sam], ['siː.loŋ] ['sam.sam] ['sam.sam], ['kuː.nin]
Hikaw 'earrings' ['hiː.kaw] ['hiː.kaw] ['hiː.kaw]
Kalbo 'walang buhok' [kal.'bo], [pa.'not] [kal.'bo], [pa.'not] ['ʔuː.paw], ['paː.not], [kal.'bo]
Pango 'not pointed nose' [pa.'ŋoʔ] [pa.'ŋoʔ], [sa.'rat] [pa.'ŋoʔ]
Mainit 'hot' [ma.'ʔiː.nit] [na.pa.ka.ba.'nas] [ma.'ʔiː.nit]
Suha 'grapefruit' [luk.'ban] [luk.'ban] [luk.'ban]
Gasera 'lamp' [ʔi.la.'wan] [ʔi.la.'wan] [ʔi.la.'wan]
Inin 'cooked (as of rice)' ['ʔin.ʔin] ['ʔin.ʔin] ['ʔin.ʔin]
Salo 'to catch' [sam.'bot] [sa.'lo] [sa.'lo]
Tilamsik 'splashing of mad on clothes' [ti.'lab.sik] [ti.'lab.sik] [ti.'lab.sik]
Hain 'to serve food' ['haː.jin] ['haː.jin] ['haː.jin]
Sangkalan 'chopping board' [saŋ.'kaː.lan] [saŋ.'kaː.lan] [saŋ.'kaː.lan]
Sitsit 'psst' ['sit.sit] ['sut.sot] ['sit.sit]
Dutdot 'to poke' ['dut.dot] ['dut.dot] ['dut.dot]
Tingkayad 'to tiptoe' [ti.ja.'kad] ['tik.de] ['tik.de]
Balibag 'to throw something forcefully' [pal.'tok] [ba.la.'bag] [ba.'liː.bag]
Tinik 'to have fish bone block the throat while eating' [ti.'nik] [ti.'nik] [ti.'nik]
Malasado 'not cooked well (as of egg)' [ma.la.'saː.do] [ma.la.'saː.do]
Pipi 'mute' [pi.'pe] [pi.'peʔ] [a.'paw] [pi.'pe]
Natapilok 'to trip one's leg' [ta.'laː.pid] [sug.'ʔok] [ta.pi.'lok]
Madaldal 'talkative' [ma.'dal.dal] [ma.'dal.dal] [ma.'dal.dal]
Butete 'Big-bellied' [bu.'teː.teʔ] ['buː.tu.sen] [bu.'teː.teʔ]
Hilaw 'raw' [hi.'law] [hi.'law] [hi.'law]
Duyan 'cradle' [ʔa.'luː.jan] ['duː.jan], [ʔa.'luː.jan] ['duː.jan]
Binatog 'steamed corn with coconut gratings and salt' [bi.na.'tog] [ki.na.'bog] [ki.na.'bog], [bi.na.'tog]
Dighay 'burp' [dig.'hal] [tik.'hal] ['dig.hal]
[si.na.'lud.sod], [si.na.'lab],
Maruya 'deep friend bananas' [ma.'ruː.ja] [ma.'ruː.ja] [tu.'riː.has], ['biː.kaŋ 'biː.kaŋ]
Buwan ‘moon/month’ [bu.'wan] ['buː.wan] ['buː.wan], [bwan]
[ʔa.lak.'dan], [ʔa.lu.'piː.han],
Alakdan 'scorpion' [ʔa.lu.'hiː.pan] [ʔu.la.'hiː.pan] [ʔa.lak.'dan]
Alamang 'small shrimp' [ʔa.la.'maŋ] [ʔa.la.'maŋ] [ʔa.la.'maŋ]
Alkansya 'piggy bank' [ʔal.kan.'ʃa] [ʔal.kan.'ʃa] [ʔal.kan.'ʃa]
Talangka 'swamp crab' [ka.'taŋ] [ka.'taŋ] [ta.laŋ.'kaʔ]
Asung ulul 'mad dog' ['ʔaː.suŋ baŋ.'ʔaw] [baŋ.'ʔaw] [ʔu.'lul]
Baba 'chin' ['baː.baʔ] ['baː.baʔ] ['baː.baʔ]
Bahaghari 'rainbow' [ba.hag.'haː.riʔ] [ba.hag.'haː.riʔ] [ba.hag.'haː.riʔ]
Balakang 'hip' [ba.la.'kan] [ba.la.'kaŋ] [ba.la.'kaŋ]
Balakubak 'dandruff' [ba.la.'kuː.bak] [ba.la.'kuː.bak] [ba.la.'kuː.bak]
Bangaw 'large fly' [baŋ.'jaw] [baŋ.'jaw] [baŋ.'jaw]
[na.tig.'ʔa.kan],
Nabulunan 'to choke food' [na.bu.'luː.nan] [na.bi.la.'ʔuː.kan] [na.bu.'luː.nan]
[na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig],
Nginig 'to tremble' [ki.naː.ka.'lig.kig] [ki.naː.ka.'log.kog] [na.'ŋiː.ŋi.nig]
Ligpit 'to clean the table (as in after eating)' [sim.'pan] ['iː.mis] [sim.'pan]
Samsam 'to get the laundry' ['sam.sam], ['kuː.nin] ['ʔiː.mis] ['sam.sam]
Hikaw 'earrings' ['hiː.kaw] ['hiː.kaw] ['hiː.kaw]
Tinik 'to have fish bone block the throat while eating' [ti.'nik] [ti.'nik] [ti.'nik]
Malasado 'not cooked well (as of egg)' [ma.la.'saː.do] [ma.la.'saː.do] [ma.la.'saː.do]
Pipi 'mute' [pi.'pe] [ʔa.'paw] ['piː.pe]
Natapilok 'to trip one's leg' [li.'ʔaj] [na.'tiː.sod] [ti.pa.'lok]
Madaldal 'talkative' [ma.'dal.dal] [ma.'dal.dal] [ma.'sat.sat]
Butete 'Big-bellied' [bun.'dat] [bun.'dat] [bun.'dat], [bu.'teː.teʔ]
Hilaw 'raw' [hi.'law] [hi.'law] [hi.'law]
Duyan 'cradle' ['duː.jan], [ʔa.'luː.jan] ['duː.jan], [ʔa.'luː.jan] ['duː.jan], [ʔa.'luː.jan]
Binatog 'steamed corn with coconut gratings and salt' [bi.na.'tog] [bi.na.'tog]
Dighay 'burp' [dig.'hal] [dig.'haj] [dig.'hal]
['biː.kaŋ 'biː.kaŋ],
Maruya 'deep friend bananas' [ma.'duː.jaʔ] [ma.'ruː.jaʔ] [tu.'riː.has]
Buwan ‘moon/month’ ['buː.wan] ['buː.wan] [bu.'wan]
[sim.'pan],
Ligpit 'to clean the table (as in after eating)' [sim.'pan] [ʔi.'him.pil]
Samsam 'to get the laundry' ['sam.sam], ['ʔiː.mis] ['sam.sam]
Hikaw 'earrings' ['hiː.kaw] [ʔa.'riː.tus]
Tinik 'to have fish bone block the throat while eating' [ti.'nik] [ti.'nik]
Malasado 'not cooked well (as of egg)' [ma.la.'saː.do] [ma.la.'saː.do]
Pipi 'mute' [pi.'pe] ['piː.pe]
Natapilok 'to trip one's leg' [ta.'liː.sod]
Madaldal 'talkative' [ma.'dal.dal] [ma.'dal.dal]
Butete 'Big-bellied' [bul.'ʔuː.nin] [bun.'dat]
Hilaw 'raw' [hi.'law] [hi.'law]
Duyan 'cradle' ['duː.jan] ['duː.jan], [ʔa.'luː.jan]
Binatog 'steamed corn with coconut gratings and salt' [bi.na.'tog] [bi.na.'tog]
Dighay 'burp' [dig.'haj] [tik.'hal]
Ligpit 'to clean the table (as in after eating)' [ʔim.'pis] ['mis.mis]
Samsam 'to get the laundry' ['sam.sam] ['sam.sam]
Hikaw 'earrings' [ʔa.'riː.tus] [ʔa.'riː.tos]
Tinik 'to have fish bone block the throat while eating' [ti.'nik] [ti.'nik]
Malasado 'not cooked well (as of egg)' [ma.la.'saː.do] [ma.la.'saː.do]
Pipi 'mute' ['piː.pe] ['piː.pe]
Natapilok 'to trip one's leg' ['liː.ʔaj] [li.'jad]
Madaldal 'talkative' [ma.'dal.dal] [ma.'dal.dal]
Butete 'Big-bellied' [bun.'dat] [bun.'dat]
Hilaw 'raw' [hi.'law] [hi.'law]
Duyan 'cradle' [ʔa.'luː.jan] [ʔa.'luː.jan]
Binatog 'steamed corn with coconut gratings and salt' [ki.na.'bog] [ki.na.'bog]
Dighay 'burp' [dig.'haj] [dig.'haj]