All the chapters of Part I are devoted to the language of a probabilistic
vision which I believe can lead to a new and deeper interaction with the reality o f the world. The "non-real" may become real i f the limitations set by Western culture on our perception o f the world are removed. These limitations have enabled the development of Western culture in all its richness and splendor. However, richness always conceals poverty within itself. A radical change in the language always signifies a radical change in the culture. This idea is attractive, but i t is also fraught with certain difficulties, which may prove to be insurmountable, and with dangers lurking in unforeseen consequences. However, whether or not we wish it, the process of cardinal changes has started. The search for new languages is also going on: the language of contemporary physics cannot be compared with that of classical physics; and the response to the papers by Zadeh, devoted to fuzzy sets, would hardly have been pos- sible even in the recent past. I have also started o n this road. The first chapter, written in an extremely laconic form, attempts to show the potentially existing universality of the language of probabilistic vision. This chapter opens up broad vistas of the probabilistic perception of the world. The second and third chapters give a detailed account of two instances o f using this language to solve problems that were unsolv- able in a familiar language. In the fourth chapter a n attempt is made to show that the language of a probabilistic vision is a continuation o f the trend in our culture which used to perceive manifoldness, made fuzzy by 2 Language of /he Probabilisfic Vision
number, as uniqueness. This had been done by Plotinus, who seemed to
follow the tradition coming from Pythagoras. Finally, the fifth chapter emphasizes the highly metaphorical character of our use o f probabilistic concepts. Randomness is regarded as a synonym for the "fuzziness" treated by Zadeh.