Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
IN
[REPORTABLE]
VERSUS
WITH
J U D G M E N T
Hrishikesh Roy, J.
Leave Granted.
Digitally signed by
MAHABIR SINGH
Date: 2019.11.19
Cadre, hereinafter referred to as “MPS Grade II Cadre”.
16:41:43 IST
Reason:
Page 1/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 2/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
above them.
Page 3/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
direct recruits.
the date on which the person was appointed but not from
date of appointment.
1977, for short “the Manipur (SC & ST) Act, 1976”,
“........................................
(14) For the reasons stated herein
above, the writ petitions being
WP(C)No.366 of 2013 and WP(C)No.120 of
2014 are allowed and consequently, the
Government orders dated 17-05-2013, 20-
01-2014 and 19-02-2014, impugned herein,
in respect of the petitioners and the
private respondents, are quashed and set
aside with the following directions:
Page 7/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Single Judge.
had entered the cadre of MPS Grade II, before the Writ
on 01.03.2007.
Page 9/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
the expression.
Page 11/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
the MPS Rules 1965 did not refer to the financial year
Page 12/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 13/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 14/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 15/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
perused.
Page 16/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
order is issued.
in the meantime.
2
(2014) 14 SCC 720
Page 17/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Pratap Singh and Ors. Vs. Reevan Singh & Ors.3, and
follows:
3
(2011) 3 SCC 267
Page 18/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
requirements of Articles 14 and 16 of the
Constitution.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45. (iv) The seniority cannot be
reckoned from the date of occurrence of
the vacancy and cannot be given
retrospectively unless it is so expressly
provided by the relevant service rules.
It is so because seniority cannot be
given on retrospective basis when an
employee has not even been borne in the
cadre and by doing so it may adversely
affect the employees who have been
appointed validly in the meantime.”
Rule 28(i)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rule 28(iii)
. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rule 16(iii)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 20/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 21/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 24/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Prakash Gupta & Ors. vs. State of J&K & Ors. 5 and Pawan
4
(1991) 3 SCC 47
5
(2000) 7 SCC 561
Page 25/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 26/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
promotees.
recruitment process.
Page 27/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
conformity therewith.
29 of the Judgment:-
6
(2002) 4 SCC 247
Page 28/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
the quotas, the seniority is fixed by
the roster points and irrespective of
the fact as to when a person is
recruited……”
the appellants.
Page 29/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Page 30/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
declared so accordingly.
disposed of.
Page 31/32
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
accordingly.
………………………………………………J.
[R.BANUMATHI]
………………………………………………J.
[A.S.BOPANNA]
………………………………………………J.
[HRISHIKESH ROY]
NEW DELHI
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Page 32/32