CASE ANALYSIS RUBRICS

DESCRIPTORS Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor

SCORES 5 4 3 2 1
AREAS
ISSUES Recognizes Recognizes Recognizes Mentions Does not
one or more multiple one valid problems that recognize the
key problems problems in problems lack main problem
in the case. the case significance or mentions
Indicates problems that
some issues are not based
are more on the facts of
important the case
than others
and explains
why
CONTENT AND Best and Important Some Failed to make Applicable
ANALYSIS applicable points are important any important points are not
points are presented points are points and presented and
presented, no while addressed, analyze the paper is full of
unnecessary unnecessary but not fully case scenario unnecessary
contents. contents are covered. with it issues. contents
Discusses left out. Considers Accurately Does not have
facts in the Discusses facts in the lists facts in a clear
case and cites facts in the case and the case but understanding
related case and cites understands does not of the facts in
knowledge related relevance of understand the case
from research knowledge these facts the relevance
and adds from research of these facts
knowledge
from personal
experience
ACTIONS Proposed More than Action Action No actions
actions best one proposed is proposed is proposed
deal with reasonable feasible not feasible
issue/s action
ORGANIZATION Points are Made a point, Made some Failed to make Points are not
AND LOGIC logical and but could points but not the point, do logical and are
well- present more logical; not not use the not supported
supported, logically and related to the concepts, by the
organized and more case itself. theories and materials
presented by organized; principles
evidence. supported by
evidences
GRAMMAR AND Proper Few or no Overlooked Overlooked Many errors,
PUNCTUATION sentence errors, but errors in several errors poorly written.
structure, sentence sentences, in spelling,
punctuation, structure structure, punctuation,
and spelling, could punctuation and/or
no revision improve. and spelling. sentence
required. structure
manifesting
carelessness.
 CASE ANALYSIS RUBRICS TEACHING PLAN/SESSION DESIGN
DESCRIPTORS Very good
SCORES 5 3
CRITERIA
TARGET CLIENT Target client is listed
and appropriate for
teaching
TOPIC Topic is listed and
appropriate for client
GENERAL OBJECTIVE A general objective is
listed and is appropriate
OBJECTIVES Specific objectives are
listed and appropriate
(SMART)
CONTENT Content is listed and
includes all significant
topics for the client.
METHODOLOGY Teaching strategies are
listed and all are
appropriate for client.
TIME ALLOTMENT Time allotment is listed
and is realistic for client
RESOURCES Resources are listed
and all are appropriate
for client.
EVALUATION Evaluation of teaching
is listed and is
appropriate for client.
REFERENCES References are listed in
correct APA format and
all are from nursing
resources
Fair Poor
1
Target client is listed Target client is not
but may not be listed.
appropriate for
teaching.
Topic is listed but may Topic is not listed.
not be appropriate for
client.
A general objective is No general objective is
listed but is not listed.
appropriate for clien
Multiple objectives are Multiple objectives are
listed but not all are not listed.
appropriate for client.
Content is listed but Content is not listed.
may be lacking
significant topics for
the client.
Teaching-learning Teaching-learning
strategies are listed but strategies are not
some may be listed.
inappropriate for client.
Time allotment is listed Time allotment is not
but times allowed may listed.
be unrealistic for client
Resources are listed Resources are not
but may not be listed.
appropriate for client.
Evaluation of teaching Evaluation of teaching
is listed but evaluation is not listed.
may not be appropriate
for client.
References are listed References are not
but not all are from listed.
nursing resources.
References may not be
in correct APA format.