Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FULL TEXT
When an experiment begins, the scientist hardly knows what the outcome will be. In a moment of adventure or
necessity, the government put three men - PS Jayakumar, RA Sankara Narayanan and Karnam Sekar - in a boat
and set them on sail into uncharted territory.
These men who head Bank of Baroda, Vijaya Bank and Dena Bank may face many a storm and choppy waters in a
journey that could in a few years make them either look like Christopher Columbus who found the new world, or
land in no man's land like Robinson Crusoe.
When the numbers are put out on an Excel sheet, the easiest way to analytical glory, the merged entity is the
second-largest by assets. But life on the integration ground is the opposite of what appears on the Microsoft Excel
file. Mergers are probably the most glamorous in the world of business, but history is as much about bitter
divorces like Chrysler-Daimler as they are about romantic rides like Procter &Gamble's with Gillette.
As with most marriage proposals, there's optimism about this too. "I look at the merger positively," says Aditya
Puri, chief executive officer of HDFC Bank, the most valuable lender. "I think it will lead to cost, product and
technology efficiencies. It is easier to manage."
MAMMOTH TASK The task at hand for the three men is of monstrous proposition. In any merger, the biggest
challenge is that of personnel. While in the private sector, the easiest action for the management is to lay off
people to derive cost savings, that option does not exist for the three CEOs. There are 90,000 staff whose future
has to be protected and concerns addressed. "There are three top reasons for the failure of any merger, one of
them is the way HR gets integrated," says PS Jayakumar, CEO of Bank of Baroda, the biggest of the three. "We are
very conscious of this. But there are some commonalities as well... like interview processes are similar, owner is
similar, organisation structure is the same kind, so there are a lot of things that are common as well."
There are multiple data centres that handle more than 10 crore customers across three banks that need to
converge. For the moment, the three banks operate on three different technology platforms which appear to be
easy to integrate but difficult to execute. "Technology integration in theory is easy to achieve but in practice it will
require a lot of hard work like just getting a new account code for all customers and communicating that will not
be a simple thing," says Jayakumar.
"Replacement of cheque books will not be simple. RTGS, NEFT details and net banking interface will take time to
change." The merged entity will have about 9,489 domestic branches which looks like a great leap forward, but of
this nearly 10%, or 941, branches are in the same pin code, which needs to be reduced without much staff
resentment.
THE SYNERGIES One of oddities of Indian banking was a single owner, the government, dominated nearly 80% of
the industry which is near monopoly, but the problem was it was spread over 21 different entities that neutralised
the advantages, the dominance would have brought it. "Why do you need so many banks with the same parentage
competing against each other, killing each other in terms of under cutting etc.?'' says Ravneet Gill, CEO, Deutsche
Bank, India.
Because of the single owner, the incentive for different entities to compete strongly and innovate did not exist
either. Whatever each bank achieved, it was more an enterprise of individuals rather than any institutional vision.
DETAILS
Subject: Chief executive officers; Bank acquisitions &mergers; Banking industry; Cost control;
Branch banking
Company / organization: Name: Bank of India; NAICS: 522110; Name: Vijaya Bank; NAICS: 522110; Name:
Procter &Gamble Co; NAICS: 311919, 322291, 325412, 325611, 325612, 325620;
Name: Microsoft Corp; NAICS: 334614, 511210; Name: Bank of Baroda; NAICS:
522110; Name: ICICI Bank; NAICS: 522110; Name: Deutsche Bank AG; NAICS:
522110, 551111
ISSN: 09718680