Table 2.

1 Grain Yield of Rice Resulting from Use of Different Foliar and Granular Insecticideds for the
Planthoppers and Stem Borers from CRD Experiment with 4 (r) Replications and 7 (t) Treatm

Treatment Grain Yield, kg/ha

Dol-Mix (1 kg) 2,537 2,069 2,104

Dol-Mix (2 kg) 3,366 2,591 2,211
DDT + y-BHC 2,536 2,459 2,827
Azodrin 2,387 2,453 1,556
Dimecron-Boom 1,997 1,679 1,649
Dimecrom-Knap 1,796 1,704 1,904
Control 1,401 1,516 1,270
Grand Total (G)
Grand mean

where:
n= number of observation 28
t= number of treatment 7
r= number of replication 4

Computation for CRD

Source of Degrees of Freedom Mean Square
Factor Sum of Square (SS)
Variation (SV) (DF) (MS)
f1 Treatment (t-1) 6 5,587,174.93 931,195.82
f2 Error (t) (r-1) 21 1,990,237.50 94,773.21
Total (n-1) 27 7,577,412.43

cv = 15.1%
Correction Fator (CF) = (Y..)2
116,484,003.57
n
SS(Yij) Treatment SS = 5,587,174.93
SS(YI.) Total SS = 7,577,412.43
SS (Y.) Error SS = 1,990,237.50

Rule:
If Fc is ≤ F0.05 = not significant
If Fc is ≥ F0.05 = reject ho
or If Fc is > F 0.01 - accept ha
If Fc is < F 0.01 = ** significant/highly significant
Interpretation:
Computed F value is greater than the value of the
tabular F at 5% and 1% respectively. Therefore,
the treatment difference is highly significant
(9.83**)
ar Insecticideds for the Control of Brown
cations and 7 (t) Treatments

Treament Treatment
Total (T) Mean
1,797 8,507 2,127
2,544 10,712 2,678
2,385 10,207 2,552
2,116 8,512 2,128
1,859 7,184 1,796
1,320 6,724 1,681
1,077 5,264 1,316
57,110 14,278
2,040

Fc* F 0.05 F.0.01

9.83 2.57 3.81

Note: Refer to Appendix E for

the value of F.0.05 (5%) and
F 0.01 (1%)
Table 2.5 Grain Yield of Rice Variety IR 8 with Six Different Rates of Seedling, from a
RCBD Experiment with Four Replications

Treatment
Treatment kg Grain Yield, kg/ha Total Treatment
seed/ha Rep.I Rep. II Rep. III Rep IV (T) Mean
25 5,113 5,398 5,307 15,818 3,955
50 5,346 5,952 4,719 16,067 4,017
75 5,272 5,713 5,483 16,468 4,117
100 5,164 4,831 4,986 14,981 3,745
Rep. total (R 20,895 21,894 20,495
Grand Total 63,334
Grand mean 2,639

where:
r = number of replication 4
t = number of treatment 6

COMPUTATION FOR RCBD:

Source of Variation (SV) Degrees of Freedom (DF) Sum of Square (SS) Mean Square

Replication (r-1) 2 (111,600,749) (55,800,374)

Treatment (t-1) 3 (83,270,547) (27,756,849)
Error (r-1) (t-1) 15 195,686,697 13,045,780
Total 20 815,402

Coefficient of Variation (cv) = 136.9%

G 2
Correction Factor (CF) =
(r)(t)
CF = 334,266,296
Total SS = 815,402
Replication SS = (111,600,749)
Treatment SS = (83,270,547)
Error SS= 195,686,697

Rule:
If Fc is ≤ F0.05 = not significant
If Fc is ≥ F0.05 = reject ho
or If Fc is > F 0.01 - accept ha
If Fc is < F 0.01 = ** significant/highly significant
Interpretation:
Computed F value is lesser than the value of the
tabular F at 5% and 1% respectively. Therefore, the
treatment difference is not significant (2.17 ns)
 Tabular F
Fc*
5% 1%
(2.13) 2.9 4.56

f1 = treatment DF
f2 = Error DF
FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT ANALYSIS

Table 3.3
Grain Yield of Three Rice Varieties Tested with Five Levels of Nitrogen in a RCB Design
Grain Yield, t/ha Treatment
Nitrogen Level
Rep Rep Rep Rep Total
kg/ha I II III IV (T)

N0 3.852 2.606 3.144 2.894 12.496

N1 4.788 4.936 4.562 4.608 18.894
N2 4.576 4.454 4.884 3.924 17.838
N3 6.034 5.276 5.906 5.652 22.868
N4 5.874 5.916 5.984 5.518 23.292
N0 2.846 3.794 4.108 3.444 14.192
N1 4.956 5.128 4.150 4.990 19.224
N2 5.928 5.698 5.810 4.308 21.744
N3 5.664 5.362 6.458 5.474 22.958
N4 5.458 5.546 5.786 5.932 22.722
N0 4.192 3.754 3.738 3.428 15.112
N1 5.250 4.582 4.896 4.286 19.014
N2 5.822 4.848 5.678 4.932 21.280
N3 5.888 5.524 6.042 4.756 22.210
N4 5.864 6.264 6.056 5.362 23.546
Rep. Total ( R ) 76.992 73.688 77.202 69.508
Grand Mean
Grand Total (G) 297.390

where:
Replication( r ) 4
Treatment (t) 5
A (variety) 3
B (N levels) 5
AxB

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
Soure of Variation Sum of Squares (SS) Mean
(SV) Degree of Freedom (DF) Square
Replication 3 2.5998 0.867
Treatment 14 44.578 3.184
Error 42 6.353 0.151
Total 59 53.531

Correction Factor (CF) 1,474.014

Total SS 53.5309
Replication SS 2.5998
Treatment SS 44.578
Error SS 6.353

Table 3.5
The Variety x Nitrogen Table of Totals from Data in Table 3.3
Nitrogen
Yield Total (AB) Total
Nitrogen V1 V2 V3 (B)
N0 12.496 14.192 15.112 41.800
N1 18.894 19.224 19.014 57.132
N2 17.838 21.744 21.280 60.862
N3 22.868 22.958 22.210 68.036
N4 23.292 22.722 23.546 69.560
Variety Total (A) 95.388 100.840 101.162 297.390

Table 3.6: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF DATA IN TABLE 3.3 FROM A 3X5 FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT IN
Soure of Variation Sum of Squares (SS) Mean
(SV) Degree of Freedom (DF) Square
Replication (r-1) 3 2.5998 0.867

Treatment (ab-1) 14 44.578 3.184

Variety [A] (a-1) 2 1.053 0.526

Nitrogen [B] (b-1) 4 41.2347 10.309

A x B (a-1)(b-1) 8 2.291 0.286

Error (r-1)(ab-1) 42 6.353 0.151

Total (rab) 59

A SS 1.053
B SS 41.2347
A X B SS 2.291
CV 7.8%

Rule:
If Fc is ≤ F0.05 = not significant
If Fc is ≥ F0.05 = reject ho
or If Fc is > F 0.01 - accept ha
If Fc is < F 0.01 = ** significant/highly significant
rogen in a RCB Design

Treatment
Mean

3.124
4.724
4.460
5.717
5.823
3.548
4.806
5.436
5.740
5.681
3.778
4.754
5.320
5.553
5.887

4.957

Tabular F
Fc*
5% 1%
5.729
21.051
ACTORIAL EXPERIMENT IN RCB DESIGN
Tabular F
Fc* Interpretation/Analysis
5% 1%
5.73 2.83 4.29 5.73**

21.05 1.94 2.54 21.05**

3.48 3.22 5.15 3.48*

68.15 2.59 3.8 68.26**

1.89 2.17 2.96 1.89ns

 Interpretation/Analysis

The result on the effect of replication is highly significant at

5% and 1% level of significance
The result on the effect of treatments is highly significant at
5% and 1% level of significance
The result indicates that the main effect of factor A (variety)
is significant at the 5% level of significance
The result indicates that the main effect of factor B (variety)
is highly significant at 5% and 1% level of significance

The results show that the varietal difference was not

significantly affected by the nitrogen level applied and that
the nitrogen effect did not differ significantly with the
varieties tested.
Shown below are the grain yield of 4 promising varieties of corn
Column Number
Row Number 1 2 3 4 Row Total
1 32.8 B 24.2 D 28.5 C 26.9 A 112.4
2 29.5 C 23.7 A 28.0 D 25.8 B 107.0
3 33.4 A 14.2 C 33.3 B 23.6 D 104.5
4 31.3 D 25.8 B 33.1 A 13.2 C 103.4
Column Total ( C ) 127.0 87.9 122.9 89.5
Grand Total (G) 427.3

Treatment
Treatment Total
A 33.4 23.7 33.1 26.9 117.1
B 32.8 25.8 33.3 25.8 117.7
C 29.5 14.2 28.5 13.2 85.4
D 31.3 24.2 28.0 23.6 107.1
Grand Total 427.3
Grand mean

where:
t - treatment = 4
c - column = 4
r - row = 4

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

SV DF SS MS Fc* F0.05
Row 3 12.06 4.02 0.47
Column 3 330.94 110.31 12.77
Treatment (F1) 3 170.74 56.91 6.59 4.76
Error (F2) 6 51.83 8.64
Total 15 565.57 37.70

Correction Factor (CF) 11,411.581

CV 11.0%
Treatment
Mean Rank
29.28 2
29.43 1
21.35 4
26.78 3
106.83
26.71

F0.01

9.78 significant at 5% level

Table 3.7 Grain Yield Data of Four Rice Varieties Grown with Six Levels of
Nitrogen in a Split plot Design with Three Replications
Grain Yield, kg/ha Variety
Variety
Rep I Rep II Rep III Variety Total Mean
N0 (O kg N/ha)
V1 4430 4478 3850 12758 4,253
V2 3944 5314 3660 12918 4,306
V3 3464 2944 3142 9550 3,183
V4 4126 4482 4836 13444 4,481
15964 17218 15488
N1 (60 kg N/ha)
V1 5418 5166 6432 17016 5,672
V2 6502 5858 5586 17946 5,982
V3 4768 6004 5556 16328 5,443
V4 5192 4604 4652 14448 4,816
21880 21632 22226
N2 (90 kg N/ha)
V1 6076 6420 6704 19200 6,400
V2 6008 6127 6642 18777 6,259
V3 6244 5724 6014 17982 5,994
V4 4546 5744 4146 14436 4,812
22874 24015 23506
N3 (120 kg N/ha)
V1 6462 7056 6680 20198 6,733
V2 7139 6982 6564 20685 6,895
V3 5792 5880 6370 18042 6,014
V4 2774 5036 3638 11448 3,816
22167 24954 23252
N4 (150 kg N/ha)
V1 7290 7848 7552 22690 7,563
V2 7682 6594 6576 20852 6,951
V3 7080 6662 6320 20062 6,687
V4 1414 1960 2766 6140 2,047
23466 23064 23214
N5 (180 kg N/ha)
V1 8452 8832 8818 26102 8,701
V2 6228 7387 6006 19621 6,540
V3 5594 7122 5480 18196 6,065
V4 2248 1380 2014 5642 1,881
22522 24721 22318
131,494
GRAND MEAN 5,479
Table 3.8 The Replication x Nitrogen Table of Yield Totals Computed from the Data in
Table 3.7
Yield Total (RA) Nitrogen
Nitrogen Rep I Rep II Rep III Total (A)
N0 15,964 17,218 15,488 48,670
N1 21,880 21,632 22,226 65,738
N2 22,874 24,015 23,506 70,395
N3 22,167 24,954 23,252 70,373
N4 23,466 23,064 23,214 69,744
N5 22,522 24,721 22,318 69,561
Rep. Total ( R ) 128,873 135,604 130,004
Grand Total (G) 394,481

Table 3.9 The Nitrogen x Variety Table of YieLd Totals Computed from Data in Table 3.7
Yield Total (AB)
Nitrogen V1 V2 V3 V4
N0 12,758 12,918 9,550 13,444
N1 17,016 17,946 16,328 14,448
N2 19,200 18,777 17,982 14,436
N3 20,198 20,685 18,042 11,448
N4 22,690 20,852 20,062 6,140
N5 26,102 19,621 18,196 5,642
Variety Total (B) 117,964 110,799 100,160 65,558

Where:
r= 3
a= 6
b= 4

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)

Tabular F
SV DF SS MS Fc*
5%
Replication 2 1,082,577 541,288

A (Nitrogen) 5 30,429,200 6,085,840 42.87 3.33

Error (a) 10 1,419,678.8 141,968
B (Variety) 3 89,888,101.15 29,962,700 85.71 2.86

AxB 15 69,343,487 4,622,899 13.22 1.96

Error (b) 36 12,584,873 349,580
Total 71 204,747,916

CF 2,161,323,047
cv (a) 6.9%
cv (b) 10.8%
Tabular F
Interpretation
1%

5.64 effects in the main plot is significant at 5% and 1% level.

4.38 effects in the subplot is significant at 5% and 1% level

the interaction effects between the main plot (A) and subplot
2.58 (B) is significant at 5% and 1% level