Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Published by BS Central
515 2nd Ave. S • Glasgow, MT 59230
406-228-4558 • fax: 406-228-4578
bscentral@nemont.net
0
l. 9 202
Vo
4,
Thurs y, May 1
da
Life is like a hot bath. The longer you stay in it, the more
wrinkled you get!
Ole walks into the hospital and tells the desk nurse,
“I want to see da eye-ear doctor.”
“There is no such doctor” she tells him. “Perhaps
you would like to see someone else?”
“Nope. I need to see da eye-ear doctor,” he says.
“But there is no such doctor,” she replies. “We have
doctors for the eyes and doctors for the ear, nose and
throat, but no eye-ear doctor.”
They go around like this for a few minutes and then
the nurse says: “I’m telling you, there is no eye-ear doctor,
but if there were one, why would you want to see him?”
“Vell it’s like dis,” Ole replies, “I keep hearing one
ting and seeing anodder.”
Letter to the Buzz In today’s highly-sensitive culture, everybody
is afraid to offend and therefore we have allowed
our moral scruples on the part of neighborly
About those barking dogs accommodation to deteriorate to the point that
A barking dog is one of those phenomenal the authorities are now forced to get involved for
anomalies that can only be heard by those whom have something as simple, trivial even, as two neighbors
not developed the ability to tune it out, similarly is a maintaining dispute over the noise created by one
baby’s cry. There is not a mother in the world that is neighbor’s dog.
aggravated by a crying baby, hers or otherwise, so too To me, it seems the question is not one of right or
is the case with an incessantly barking dog and those wrong, nor of political correctness nor incorrectness
who themselves, keep such dogs. for the consequences are not so dire as all that.
The major difference between these two Rather it is a question of neighborly responsibility.
examples? The likelihood of a dog’s incessant barking No neighbor is opposed to a dog, so long as that dog
disturbing neighbors is much greater than that of a does not disturb the peace to which they are entitled.
crying baby’s. This of course, is due primarily to the Therefore, the responsibility falls to the owner,
proximity of a specified dog to those neighboring the responsibility to train, maintain, regulate, and
houses and the ears within. A dog’s bark can easily otherwise account for their dog’s behavior inasmuch
carry over a mile, especially with no trees or buildings as it may be disturbing to one’s neighbors and also as
to break-up the sound. Never mind when the air is to the well-being of the dog. After all, keeping a dog
thin, clear and breezy, it is then possible to hear a dog is a privilege, not a right and as such it requires one
bark up to two miles away. A baby’s cry, on the other to remain in good standing within the confines of law
hand, is barely audible through a tightly shut door. and neighborly respectability, the same as having a
The Dog and Cat Management Act of 1995 license to drive.
defines excessive barking as a noise that persistently Peace!
occurs or continues to such a degree or extent ~ Larraine Eiland
that it unreasonably interferes with the peace, the
comfort or the convenience of a person. This is a
very opinion-based definition in that no two people’s
comfort levels are the same, nor does it take the same
amount of applied force (barking) to interfere with
two different people’s places of peace.
Even still as such defined, the responsibility does
not fall to the neighbors, rather it is clearly the
responsibility of any dog owner to ensure their
neighbors’ peace is not disturbed by their dog.