NOTE: Red Items are to have a containment plan.

SUPPLIER LAUNCH AUDIT (SLA)

DATE: February 28, 2018
AUDITOR: Terrie Dittenber
AUDITOR EMAIL: terrie.dittenber@boppbusch.com
PROGRAM: C1TL
COMMODITY: Metal Stampings
SUPPLIER: Bopp-Busch Manufacturing Co.
SUPPLIER DUNS: 021093638
SUPPLIER LOCATION: 545 E. Huron Rd. Au Gres, MI 48703
SUPPLIER CONTACT: Joeseph Oswald- Quality Assurance Manager
SUPPLIER CONTACT EMAIL: joe.oswald@boppbusch.com

Major issues found that could impact the GM Assembly Plants. Containment must be
Implemented and Documented. Red:
Minor issues found that should not impact the GM Assembly Plants. Yellow:
No issues found that will impact the GM Assembly Plants. Green:

SECTION COMMENTS STATUS (R,Y,G)

People G
Facilities G
Equipment G
Design G
Tier'd Supplier Information. Review GM 1927-25 APQP Matrix G
Tooling / Gages G
Appearance G
PPAP G
Run @ Rate G
GP12 Early Production Containment G
Error Proofing G
Aftermarket / Service Parts Operations (SPO) Related G
Containment G
Order To Delivery (OTD) Supply Chain Requirements G
Problem Reporting / Resolution (PRR) - Parts Per Million (PPM) G
Floor Review G
GENERAL QUESTIONS G
ROADBLOCKS G

Questions Comments Status (R,Y,G)

People

1 Have you hired all personnel who are required to manage the
program and meet your Operating Plan? yes
1a. If you have not met your hiring requirements, when will they be
G
completed? n/a
2 Are all personnel trained on their required operations? When
should this be completed? yes
2a. If personnel are not trained, when do you plan on completing G
the training? n/a
2b. Personnel plan provided?
Do you have the appropriate, dedicated management team -
3 Program Mgr., SQ/APQP Mgr., Eng. Mgr., - available and in
place to support a successful launch? yes
3a. Is there an dedicated/empowered Program Manager/reporting
structure? yes
3b. If not, what is your plan to support the program/s? Plan
provided? n/a
3c. Do you have available resources at other facilities from which to
G
draw? yes
3d. At what point in the launch process would their support focus
change (end of acceleration, six months after launch)? Explanation Six months after launch, the lessons learned and GP-12 results would be reviewed to
provided? determine if release is warranted.

January 2009 1 of 8 GM1927-43

 NOTE: Red Items are to have a containment plan.
Questions Comments Status (R,Y,G)
3f. Do you have a Red X/problem solving person identified to
support the Program? yes
4 What is your employee turnover? Annual Voluntary turnover rate is 10.5%
4a. Is that turnover percent within Industry/Regional averages? Yes, the industry Annual Voluntary turnover rate is 21.5% and the Manufacturing G
industry Annual Voluntary turnover rate is 16.5%
IF NO, explanation provided? n/a
5 Are the Employee's represented by a union? no
IF YES: 5a. When does the contract renew? no
5b. If within this next year, are there any issues which could
impact launch? n/a
G
5c. Are there any work rules that prohibit overtime or weekend
work? no
Facilities

6 If any facilities construction is required, is it completed?

Include tier 2. Not required
6a. When will it be completed? n/a
6b. Is there a plan in place for the completion? Plan provided?
n/a
6c. If construction is not complete, does implementation to the
plan enable you to meet all customer build requirements and G
through SSF and SOP? n/a
6d. Are there any facilities issues within your tier supplier base?
None
6e. For SFO operations does the supplier have backup utilities to
maintain operations. n/a
Equipment
7 Is all equipment purchased and delivered? Yes
7a. What is the status of the equipment?
Does equipment capacity match the contracted
capacity requirement. No additional equipment required
7b. If the equipment has not been purchased, when will it be?
n/a
7c. If all equipment is not installed, when will it be? n/a G
7d. Do you have an equipment plan? Capability requirements?
Not required
Plan provided? n/a
7e. Does the plan include equipment technical support personnel?
n/a
7f. Does the plan include adequate spare tools? Spare tool lists for all equipment is part of TPM
Design
Are there any pending design changes preventing you from
8 submitting for Full PPAP approval at the program PPAP
submission date? None
8a. If so, how many changes are in progress? n/a
8b. When will the design be finalized and changes be incorporated
into the manufacturing process? n/a G
8c. Issues open/closed incorporated into DFMEA/PFMEA n/a
8d. Does your timing comprehend updating appropriate
documentation, (DFMEA, PFMEA, Proc. Flow diagram, Process
Control Plan - GP12 PCP), inspection processes, GP12 data
collection modifications, fixtures/gages, etc.? n/a
If validation is not completed and approved by the customer,
9 are you currently working with the customer validation
engineer to resolve this issue? Name of the customer
Validation Engineer:
Validation not complete, ADVP&R approved G
9a. Does this impact any component parts, validation plans, or
fixtures/gages? Explanation provided? GM 3660 Approval Date?
No
Tier'd Supplier Information. Review GM 1927-25 APQP Matrix

10 Who are your tier 2 or raw materials suppliers? Tier 2

Supplier Name Target Steel, current supplier with good quality rating. G
10a. Potential risk explanation provided? No risk identified, current supplier with good quality rating.
11 Has your organization acquired any Suppliers in the past 6
months? Not for this program
IF YES: Explain details (Include Name/Location): n/a
11a. Is your tiered Supplier Footprint finalized? n/a G
11b. Was PPAP level 5 performed at the tiered supplier? n/a
11c. Will this acquisition impact our Launch in any way? n/a
Explain:
Tooling / Gages
12 Is the tooling complete? No
12a. Plan in place for on-going ITF, KPC gauging control? No ITF or KPC's required
Do KPCs have real time controls? Is there a documented variation
No KPC's identified,
reduction plan? Are layered audits conducted for compliance of There is a documented improvement plan.
KPCs and ITFs? Are layered audit violations made visible and
reviewed at Fast Response. Layered audits are completed for all product.
Lyered audit issues are included in Fast Response review.
G
January 2009 2 of 8 GM1927-43
 NOTE: Red Items are to have a containment plan.
Questions Comments Status (R,Y,G)
12a. If the tooling is not complete, when will it be complete? No, 4/20/18 G
12b. What are the issues preventing tooling from being complete?
No issues, 24 week completion time is within the quoted timing.
Explanation provided? Timing, the tool plan was communicated at time of TKO.
12c. Does your tooling plan allow for on-time completion of
tooling? Yes
Plan provided? No
13 Is gauging complete? No

13a. Have you identified internal Key Product Characteristics that

must be included in the gage plan? What are they? Yes, we have identified KPC's and a gage design has been approved.
Fit to datum scheme and fulfill all GD&T requirements
13b. Is gauging selection adequate? Is there a backup plan in the G
event there is a lack of gauging? Yes, CMM is the backup for lack of gauging.
13c. SQE/DRE/ME signed-off on gauging plan Yes
13d. Was the Measurement Systems Analysis completed and No, the gauging is not complete yet, but we submit MSA to GM requirements for every
acceptable per the customer's requirements? part.
Appearance
14 Do the parts require an Appearance Approval? No
14a. Have you received customer standard approval? Agreement?
n/a G
14b. If visual approval is not complete, when will it be complete?
n/a
15 Do you have approved standards or master parts.? n/a G
16 If boundary samples are required, are they complete, signed
and approved? n/a
16a. Is there a signed and approved and available boundary
G
sample at the supplier and customer location? n/a
PPAP

Are there any Commercial issues, including Directed Buy

17 component requirements, preventing you from submitting for
Full PPAP, meeting the published schedules, or conducting
and passing a full Run @ Rate?
No
G
17a. Do you have a meeting scheduled with GM Purchasing to
resolve these issues? With whom? Provide name and date.
n/a
What is your PPAP status? Include the tier'd supplier list (GM
18 1927-25 APQP). What is your scheduled PPAP Date. Are you
on schedule for all parts? List exceptions. No PPAP status at this time, scheduled PPPAP is 9/10/18
18a. Do you understand the issues that define your current status?
Yes
18b. If you do not have full approval on all parts, when will you
have full approval? 9/10/18
18c. If Rejected or Non-saleable, what is the date you will resubmit
for a saleable status? 9/10/18
G
18d. If parts are identified with Reject status, do you know that
you cannot ship parts to cover any builds until a shippable status is
attained? n/a
18e. Do you have a GM 1927-25M PPAP Component Status Matrix?
Provide matrix. No
18f. Do you have a list of parts which you conducted a PPAP level 5
at your tiered suppliers? Not required
Run @ Rate
19 Has a R@R been conducted? No
IF YES: 19a. For how many hours was the R@R conducted? n/a
19b. What was the status of the conducted R@R? n/a
If a R@R is not complete has a capacity analysis been performed?
Yes
If a capacity analysis has not been performed what is the
completion date? n/a

19c. If issues have been identified that keep you from a PASS
status, do you have a plan to achieve a PASS status? Plan provided?
No issues identified
19d. Is there a new schedule date? Does your date meet the
published scheduled date? Provide date. Not required
19e. If R@R has not been conducted, is it scheduled? Provide date.
Yes, scheduled for 8/6/18 G
19f. Do you have a component R@R status matrix? Provide.Ref.
GM 1927-25 APQP. Yes
19g. Do you have any commercial issues with the Contracted
Capacity vs capability? Volume comprehended in tooling? What is
your contracted tool capacity? No
19h. Are you actively engaged with GM Purchasing to resolve these
issues? n/a
Provide name of the GM contact and date of next meeting:
n/a

January 2009 3 of 8 GM1927-43

 NOTE: Red Items are to have a containment plan.
Questions Comments Status (R,Y,G)
19i. Are sufficient quantities of containers scheduled to be
available to support your R@R? If No, explain: Unknown, packaging has not been determined.
19j. Have you audited all Tier II for compliance to contracted
volume requirements? Not required
GP12 Early Production Containment

20 Does supplier have full understanding of the GP12 procedure,

including: Yes
20a. A separate area identified, away from shipping, receiving, and
the production area? SQE Must approve Gp12 plan & area prior to
PPAP. Yes
20b. A data collection process? Yes
20c. Inspection points to address any pre-production PRRs?
Yes
20d. A support person identified to provide data analysis,
verification of process enhancements, and follow up on
documentation enhancements? Yes
20e. Exit criteria established and formally agreed upon? Yes G
Formal agreement provided? Yes
20f. Who is the management representative who will sign off on
quality of Joe Oswald- Quality Assurance Manager
products shipped during GP12? Provide name and title:
Joe Oswald- Quality Assurance Manager
20g. GP12 improvement plan provided? Exit criteria required.
Joe Oswald- Quality Assurance Manager
20h. Do you have technical support identified to be at the GM
plants during Pilots and SOP? No
20i. Are GP12 violations documented and reported at the daily fast
response meeting? Yes
Error Proofing

What is your error proofing methodology? For example, do you

21 error proof a process based on past history, PFMEA and high Risk
Priority Numbers (RPNs), etc.
We utilize lessons learned, PFMEA, and error proofing review of each process
21a. Is your labeling process error-proofed? Yes
21b. Have all of your tiered suppliers error-proofed their labeling
processes? Not required
21c. Do you have a verification process in place for all error
G
proofed processes? Yes
21d. Does this verification process assure you that your error
proofing methods cannot be overridden? Yes

21e. Is error proofing verified daily via layered audit with reaction
plan and violations reported daily at the Fast Response meeting?
Yes
Aftermarket / Service Parts Operations (SPO) Related
Do you understand the requirements for shipping service parts and
22 doing business with SPO/Aftermarket (i.e., access to GM Supply G
Power)? Yes
Do you have a program manager or individual dedicated to the
23
service/aftermarket business? No
G
Do you have the capability to send electronic shipping notifications
24 (ASNs) and receive electronic schedules from the G
Aftermarket/SPO? Yes
Are you capable of producing sufficient capacity for regular
25 assembly plant requirements, as well as service part requirements G
for Aftermarket/SPO? Yes
Containment

26 Are any of your products from any of your customers in

containment? No
26a. Are any of your tier suppliers in containment? Explain.
No
26b. Have enhancements been added to the GP12 plans to address
discrepancies? When required G
26c. Is data being collected and analyzed for product/process
improvements? Yes
26d. Is there a documented process for containment for parts out
of normal process? Yes
26e. Are issues reported at the daily fast response meeting? Yes
27 Are you experiencing any premium freight issues
(Inbound/Outbound) for any customer? No
Resolution plan provided? n/a
G
27a. Are any of your tier suppliers shipping premium freight?
n/a
Resolution plan provided? n/a
Order To Delivery (OTD) Supply Chain Requirements

January 2009 4 of 8 GM1927-43

 NOTE: Red Items are to have a containment plan.
Questions Comments Status (R,Y,G)
28a. Are you aware of the OTD Standard Supply Chain
Requirements document (I.e. GM1700A or similar regional
28 specific document) that is part of the Request For Quote (RFQ) G
Terms and Conditions? If NO, supplier to obtain from GM and
ensure compliance.
Yes
29 Containerization: Yes
29a. Do you know who to contact for container related issues
for your program? Yes
29b. Do you have container and/or labeling related issues that are G
not being addressed? No
29c. Have you planned a trial shipment (prior to Pilot) with your
Engine/Transmission assy plant? The pilot shipment or PTR trial will be the pilot shipment which will occur in August
30 Material Flow / EDI

30a. Do you have a process for ensuring all components & finished
goods use First-In First-Out (FIFO) inventory management?
Yes
30b. Have you defined your shipping & receiving window times
according to customer schedule requirements? Currently shipping to Spring Hill and window and scheduling is set.
30c. Do you have electronic data interchange capability for
receiving schedules & transmitting shipping notifications? Yes
30d. Are you receiving timely schedules prior to material required
date? (GMNA/AP/LAAM = 20 wks GME=40 wks) Yes
G
30e. Do you know the contractually established Lean Capacity
Rates & Maximum Capacity Rates for your part numbers? If NO,
contact your buyer for definition Yes
30f. Do you perform sequencing & sub-assembly functions?
No sequencing or sub assembly requried for this program.
30f2. If YES, are primary & back-up systems in place to receive
customer sequenced schedule transmission? n/a
30g. Have you clearly communicated your supply chain
requirements (i.e. capacity) to your Tier 1 suppliers including
outside processors? Not required
31 Logistics & Warehousing
31a. If shipping from an offshore manufacturing location: No shipping from offshore manufacturing locations.

31a1. Do you maintain four (4) scheduled weeks of buffer

inventory at a pre-determined regional warehouse that supports
the customer facility (your shipping destination)?
n/a
31a2. Are part's) International Commercial (INCO) terms Free G
Carrier (FCA) -Title Transfer Our Plant (TTOP)/Customer
controlled warehouse?
If "NO", contact your Customer Buyer for conversion. n/a
30b. If you are a supplier shipping out of Mexico, do you have a
warehouse established in the ship to country supporting the
customer manufacturing facility? n/a
Problem Reporting / Resolution (PRR) - Parts Per Million (PPM)
32 Problem Reporting & Resolution (PRR)
Review past 12 months PRRs implementation status.

32a. Does it comprehend repeat issues (suggesting a problem with

true root cause analysis), or many PRRs or Yellow or Red Bills for
different issues (suggesting manufacturing / processing problem)? No repeat issues.
Have you developed a Read Across Matrix at the Plant and Low PRR count, less than 5 in 6 mos.
Corporate level? NO yellow or red bills.
Read across matrix is developed.

32b. Were any PRRs or Yellow or Red Bills in this analysis

answered "reinstructed the operator?" Are PRR commitments
tracked at Fast Response with report out on late issues? Are No yellow or red bill PRR's.
Corrective actions verified by Layered Audit? PRR commitments are tracked on Fase Response report.
Corrective actions are verified by product audit.
32c. Did you error proof that process? Yes
32d. Do you have a plan to error proof that process? Plan
provided? Yes
G
32e. Once improvement was identified, in place, validated and the
customer APQP SQE approved, did you update all documents. Was
corrective action/s added to Layered Audit validated, did you
update all documents?
Yes

32f. Based on your analysis, have you ever prepared a business

case identifying improvements, and utilized it as compliance to
Continuous Improvement procedure (GP8)?customer's
No
32g. Have you shared your business case with your customer
APQP SQE, Buyer and customer facilities? No
32h. Do you have an area identified in your plant to evaluate
customer returns? Yes
32i. Based on this evaluation, do you have corrective action teams
in place to improve the product/process? Yes

January 2009 5 of 8 GM1927-43

 NOTE: Red Items are to have a containment plan.
Questions Comments Status (R,Y,G)
32j. Does this improvement process include error proofing?
Yes
Floor Review
33 Is there evidence of:
Incoming material area? Yes
Means of inspection? Yes
Quarantine area? Yes
Inspection areas? Yes
Data collection/analysis? Yes
Adequate reaction plans to reflect controls? Action, go to one
operation and fully check a part 100% per the control plan looking
for any out of print item. Yes
Error proofed processes? Yes
Detailed, effective operator instructions?: Yes
Visual aids? Yes
Boundary samples? Yes
Quality controls? Yes
G
Good housekeeping? Yes
GP12 area defined? Yes
Sediment control plan? Not sure what sediment control plan is
Gamma 3 sediment data available? Not sure what sediment control plan is
Error proofed labeling process for shipping? Yes
Clearly identified shipping & receiving areas? Yes
An error-proofed storage system or storage locations that are
clearly identified by specific part numbers? Yes
NOTE: This list may not be all inclusive, but is intended for general
observation identification. n/a
Should follow up be required from the floor review, provide date.
No
GENERAL QUESTIONS
Have you verified that there is sufficient raw materials in the
34
pipeline to meet ramp up schedules? Yes
G
Does the supplier have the latest ramp up plan from their
customer? Yes
G
Are you currently shipping in expedite mode? If Yes, what is the
plan to get out of expedite shipments. Provide detailed plan. G
No
Has the supplier completed their CQI 9 Heat Treat assessment if
applicable? n/a
G
Has the supplier surveyed their Tier II for compliance of CQI 9 Heat
Treat requirements applicable? n/a
G
Does the supplier use lot acceptance sampling before shipment?
No
G
Does the supplier have a formal system to audit their Tier II
suppliers? Yes
G
Were previous BIQS audits conducted & issues resolved? If audit
was not conducted this item is Red. If audit was conducted then G
enter result of BIQS Audit. Yes
Were previous Process Control Plan audits conducted & issues
resolved? Yes
G
Were previous GP-12 audits conducted & issues resolved? Yes G
Are daily process layered audits in place? No G
Did you conduct a layered audit of a critical process? Yes G
Did you review the last layered audit by the Plant Manager? Yes G
Does the supplier know their material cost targets at the plant or
corporate level? Does the supplier have sufficiency plans to meet G
the material cost targets? Yes
Did you identify any Waste Elimination opportunities? No G
ROADBLOCKS

Please identify ANY issues requiring customer support to remove

35
roadblocks, or any issues which COULD impact a flawless launch: G
None
Do you have any commercial or financial issues which could impact
36
launch? No
G

January 2009 6 of 8 GM1927-43

Revision History – (date) Changes

Section
General Questions
 Change Date
BIQS implementation to replace QSB+ 04Jan2016