a) Chemical degradation or coking is a result from a carbonaceous (coke) material from
fluid phase being deposited on the surface of a catalyst, causing activity loss due to blocking of sites or pores. To prevent coking the catalyst support technology can be improved by tailoring the pore size distribution to give greater tolerance to the contaminants before deactivation is evident. Using noble metal catalyst can also reduce the likelihood of coking because they do not dissolve carbon compared to Nickle-based catalyst. Decoking also can be done by combustion or steaming as coking is a reversible catalyst poisoning.
Mechanical degradation or sintering is the loss of catalytic activity due to a loss of
active surface area which are due to prolonged exposure to high gas-phase temperatures. The active surface area may be lost by crystal agglomeration and growth of the metals deposited on the support. The active surface can also be lost by narrowing or closing of the pores inside the catalyst pellet To prevent sintering, catalysts may be doped with stabilizers (high melting temperature and preventing agglomeration of small crystals) such as chromia, alumina, and magnesia. For platinum catalysts, add a trace amount of chlorinated compounds in the process stream. Chlorine increases the activation energy for the sintering process of Pt and thus reduces the sintering rate for platinum catalysts.
Deactivation of catalyst by poisoning is an irreversibly chemisorbed to the active
sites. This reduces the number of sites available for the main reaction. The best method to reduce poisoning is to decrease to acceptable levels the poison content of the feed. This is generally achieved by appropriate treatments of the feed. Another approach that can be taken to prevent poisoning is to choose proper catalyst formulations and design. b) Catalyst life may be as short as a few seconds, as in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), or if several years for ammonia synthesis but, inevitably, the catalyst will need regeneration or replacement. However, deactivation of a cracking catalyst will almost certainly reduce the activity. The three main types of catalyst deactivation are poisoning, fouling, or thermal degradation (sintering).
The thermal deactivation of a catalyst is a permanent deactivation that occurs at very
high temperatures. Activity loss from thermal effects is caused by the reorganization of the catalyst structure at these high temperatures. For instant, hydrothermal deactivation, also a permanent loss of catalyst activity, is the more prevalent mechanism for activity loss during the regeneration cycle. Hydrothermal deactivation results from zeolite dealumination and subsequent crystallinity loss, as well as pore size shifts and surface area loss in the matrix.
For deactivation of catalyst through poisoning, the poisoning is due to irreversible
adsorption of catalysts poisons on the active sites. The poisoning molecule may be a reactant or a product in the main reaction, but normally is the impurities in the feed stream. For example, petroleum feed stocks contain trace impurities such as sulfur, lead, and other components which are too costly to remove. This reduces the number of sites available for the main reaction. For active site poisoning, there are three limiting models, uniform site poisoning, selective site poisoning and pore mouth poisoning. In the uniform site poisoning model, deactivation is assumed to occur uniformly throughout the catalyst particle and the poison deactivates all sites identically. Selective site-poisoning applies if the active sites are inhomogeneous. For In pore mouth poisoning, all acid sites are assumed to be uniformly distributed, but the rate of reaction is much more rapid than the rate of diffusion. Thus, the area around the pore mouth quickly becomes deactivated by direct poisoning, further reducing diffusion into the pore.
Chemical degradation or coking is a result from a carbonaceous (coke) material from
fluid phase being deposited on the surface of a catalyst, causing activity loss due to blocking of sites or pores. For example, zeolite pores are only slightly larger than the reactant molecules, and only a few atoms of carbon or other foulant may be required to effectively block pores. One type of pore blockage is pore mouth plugging. Essentially all foulant is deposited near the pore mouths and very few of the active sites are covered by the foulant. The activity declines more rapidly than the number of deactivated sites and the diffusion rate decreases as the pores become increasingly blocked. In addition to pore mouth plugging, pore blockage could also occur further inside the crystal, or the coke could block channels or intersections deeper inside the crystal. For a zeolite with a three-dimensional channel network, like H-USY, the effect of a blocked pore would be to poison only those sites within the immediate super cage. As a result, the activity would be proportional to the number of remaining and accessible active sites.