Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Student ID : 2017283562
Group members :
Group : AS2466Q
OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION
C. Flavour Intensity
Taste rely on the sensation produced through the stimulation of the taste buds
while flavour is the combination of senses of taste, aroma and mouth feel effect of the
sample food, which is in broader concept. Flavour intensity is basically the measure
of how strong a specific taste present on a certain food and beverages is.
D. Aftertaste
Aftertaste or mouth feel is encompasses textural and chemical sensation
present in food product such as astringency, spicy heat, cooling and metallic flavour.
The result of chemicals in food and drink product will continue to interact with a
specific taste receptors within the taste buds. Overall, it is generally classified as any
taste remains in mouth after the tested food or drink has been swallowed or spit out.
METHOD
296 ……………………………..
353 ……………………………..
847 ……………………………...
535 ……………………………...
248 ………………………………
524 ………………………………
716 ………………………………
985 ………………………………
432 ………………………………
625 ………………………………
C. Flavour Intensity
The samples represent varying level of flavour intensity which may detect in
food product were prepared. Next, the respondents were asked to fill in the intensity
scale of these sample using intensity scale values of: 0 = no threshold, 1 = slight, 2 =
moderate and 3 = strong.
The samples prepared are:
Based on the result obtained, most respondents were able the recognise the
basic taste when the sample was diluted with distilled water however they found it
was a little bit hard to recognise the taste when the sample is diluted with orange
juice. This variety sensory acceptance results to a broad range of product acceptability
as they may not have exactly the same acceptability level for the product being tested.
For instance, some may prefer for a sweet tangy orange juice yet some may prefer for
more sour taste to be present in an orange juice. Thus, basic taste recognition test is
crucial for the manufacturer to set a specific range for their product in order to meet
the consumers’ demand.
1.308 ±
192 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 2 17 0.855
1.308 ±
279 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 17 0.751
2.923 ±
649 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 38 0.277
For the flavour intensity test, the data obtained shows that there is only a few difference in the level of intensity of the coded food
samples by the respondents. This is because the length of time the flavour lasts and the dominant attributes at any given point also how the
attributes blend together compare to the picturesque of the product in our mind results in the actual flavour of the product when the intensity
amount is only one small part of the flavour.
D. Aftertaste
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
486 Sweet Tingli Sweet Zest, Sugary Sour, A bit Sweet, Sweet Astrin- Sweet, Sweet-
ng sweet malt, gassy bitter Astrin- mellow gent sour ness
effect zest gent taste
hint
967 Super Bitter Bitter Bitter Bitter Seriously Bitter Bitter Bitter Bitter Bitter Bitter Bitter-
bitter bitter ness
514 Super Extre Too Bitter Very Bitter Much Bitter Salty, Bitter Bitter Very Strong-
super mely bitter bitter than tea bitter bitter bitter ly bitter
bitter bitter with
slightly
sweet
725 Creamy Malty Bitter Creamy Bitter Milky Sweet Creamy Gritti- Sweet Choco- Milky, Sweet-
sweet sweet with cocoa with ness, creamy late slightly ness
slightly slightly dairy taste bitter
bitter bitter sweet
taste
The results of after taste of the sample food product is vary for every respondents by
intensity and over time. This situation is also contributes by the reaction to only one flavour
by only half of the flavour cells within the specialized taste buds. As we can see from the
obtained results, for chocolate sample of 725 coded, some respondents may found a bitter
taste in the chocolate compound while some may not responds to the bitter after taste. Thus, it
is important for food manufacturer to identify whether their product’s after taste is acceptable
to the consumers or vice versa.
CONCLUSION
Sensory evaluation is a scientific discipline that analyse and measure human responds
to the composition and nature of food and drink. Every person has different ability to
recognise and evaluate the taste of sample thus enable the manufacturer to broaden their
product range in order to meet the consumers’ demand. This experiment was conducted to
expose the respondents or students in this case, to conduct and experience the sensory
evaluation test themselves. In addition, the experiment was also being conducted to
differentiate between basic recognition test, odour perception and identification test, flavour
intensity as well as after taste test. The objectives of the experiment was successfully
achieved.
REFERENCES
Aouzelleg, A. (n.d.). Sensory analysis , the different methods and how it is used.