Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Sec.
192.1 Scope of part. Subpart D–Design of Pipeline Components
192.3 Definitions.
192.5 Class locations. 192.141 Scope.
192.7 Incorporation by reference. 192.143 General requirements.
192.9 Gathering lines. 192.144 Qualifying metallic components.
192.10 Outer Continental Shelf pipelines. 192.145 Valves.
192.11 Petroleum gas systems. 192.147 Flanges and flange accessories.
192.13 General. 192.149 Standard fittings.
192.14 Conversion to service subject to this 192.150 Passage of internal inspection devices.
part. 192.151 Tapping.
192.15 Rules of regulatory construction. 192.153 Components fabricated by welding.
192.16 Customer notification. 192.155 Welded branch connections.
192.17 [Reserved] 192.157 Extruded outlets.
192.159 Flexibility.
Subpart B–Materials 192.161 Supports and anchors.
192.163 Compressor stations: Design and con-
192.51 Scope. struction.
192.53 General. 192.165 Compressor stations: Liquid removal.
192.55 Steel pipe. 192.167 Compressor stations: Emergency
192.57 [Reserved] shutdown.
192.59 Plastic pipe. 192.169 Compressor stations: Pressure limit-
192.61 [Reserved] ing devices.
192.63 Marking of materials. 192.171 Compressor stations: Additional
192.65 Transportation of pipe. safety equipment.
192.173 Compressor stations: Ventilation.
Subpart C–Pipe Design 192.175 Pipe-type and bottle-type holders.
192.177 Additional provisions for bottle-type
192.101 Scope. holders.
192.103 General. 192.179 Transmission line valves.
192.105 Design formula for steel pipe. 192.181 Distribution line valves.
192.107 Yield strength (S) for steel pipe. 192.183 Vaults: Structural design require-
192.109 Nominal wall thickness (t) for steel ments.
pipe. 192.185 Vaults: Accessibility.
192.111 Design factor (F) for steel pipe. 192.187 Vaults: Sealing, venting, and ventila-
192.113 Longitudinal joint factor (E) for steel tion.
pipe. 192.189 Vaults: Drainage and waterproofing.
192.115 Temperature derating factor (T) for 192.191 Design pressure of plastic fittings.
steel pipe. 192.193 Valve installation in plastic pipe.
192.117 [Reserved] 192.195 Protection against accidental over-
192.119 [Reserved] pressuring.
192.121 Design of plastic pipe.
192.123 Design limitations for plastic pipe.
1
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
2
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
3
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
4
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
192.911 What are the elements of an integrity 192.949 How does an operator notify OPS?
management program? 192.951 Where does an operator file a report?
192.913 When may an operator deviate its
program from certain requirements of Appendix A – [Reserved]
this subpart?
192.915 What knowledge and training must Appendix B – Qualification of Pipe.
personnel have to carry out an integ-
rity management program? Appendix C – Qualification of Welders for Low
192.917 How does an operator identify poten- Stress Level Pipe.
tial threats to pipeline integrity and use
the threat identification in its integrity Appendix D – Criteria for Cathodic Protection
program? and Determination of Measure-
192.919 What must be in the baseline assess- ments.
ment plan? Appendix E to Part 192—Guidance on Deter-
192.921 How is the baseline assessment to be mining High Consequence Areas
conducted? and on Carrying Out Require-
192.923 How is direct assessment used and ments in the Integrity Management
for what threats? Rule
192.925 What are the requirements for using
External Corrosion Direct Assessment Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5103,
(ECDA)? 60102, 60104, 60108, 60109,
192.927 What are the requirements for using 60110, 60113, and 60118; and
Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment 49 CFR 1.53.
(ICDA)?
192.929 What are the requirements for using
Direct Assessment for Stress Corro-
sion Cracking (SCCDA)?
192.931 How may Confirmatory Direct As-
sessment (CDA) be used?
192.933 What actions must be taken to ad-
dress integrity issues?
192.935 What additional preventive and miti-
gative measures must an operator
take?
192.937 What is a continual process of evalua-
tion and assessment to maintain a
pipeline's integrity?
192.939 What are the required reassessment in-
tervals?
192.941 What is a low stress reassessment?
192.943 When can an operator deviate from
these reassessment intervals?
192.945 What methods must an operator use
to measure program effectiveness?
192.947 What records must an operator keep?
5
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
6
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
7
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Pipe means any pipe or tubing used in the State means each of the several States, the
transportation of gas, including pipe-type holders. District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico.
Pipeline means all parts of those physical
facilities through which gas moves in transporta- Transmission line means:
tion, including pipe, valves, and other appurte- (1) A pipeline, other than a gathering line, that:
nance attached to pipe, compressor units, meter- (i) Transports gas from a gathering line, stor-
ing stations, regulator stations, delivery stations, age facility, or another transmission line to a distri-
holders, and fabricated assemblies. bution center, storage facility, or large volume cus-
tomer that is not downstream from a distribution
Pipeline facility means new and existing center;
pipeline, rights-of-way, and any equipment, facil- (ii) Operates at a hoop stress of 20 percent or
ity, or building used in the transportation of gas or more of SMYS; or
in the treatment of gas during the course of trans- (iii) Transports gas within a storage field.
portation. (2) A large volume customer may receive simi-
lar volumes of gas as a distribution center, and in-
Service Line means a distribution line that cludes factories, power plants, and institutional
transports gas from a common source of supply to users of gas.
an individual customer, to two adjacent or adjoin-
ing residential or small commercial customers, or Transportation of gas means the gathering,
to multiple residential or small commercial cus- transmission, or distribution of gas by pipeline or
tomers served through a meter header or mani- the storage of gas, in or affecting interstate or for-
fold. A service line ends at the outlet of the cus- eign commerce.
tomer meter or at the connection to a customer's
piping, whichever is further downstream, or at the [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
connection to customer piping if there is no meter. Amdt. 192-13, 38 FR 9084, Apr. 10, 1973;
Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
Service regulator means the device on a Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21, 1988;
service line that controls the pressure of gas deliv- Amdt. 192-67, 56 FR 63764, Dec. 5, 1991;
ered from a higher pressure to the pressure pro- Amdt. 192-72, 59 FR 17281, May 12, 1994;
vided to the customer. A service regulator may Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996;
serve one customer or multiple customers through Amdt. 192-81, 62 FR 61692, Nov. 19, 1997;
a meter header or manifold. Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
Amdt. 192-89, 65 FR 54440, Sept. 8, 2000;
SMYS means specified minimum yield Amdt. 192-91, 68 FR 11748, Mar. 12,
strength is: 2003;Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
2003; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14,
(a) For steel pipe manufactured in accordance 2004; Amdt. 192-98, 69 FR 48400, Aug. 10,
with a listed specification, the yield strength speci- 2004]
fied as a minimum in that specification; or
(b) For steel pipe manufactured in accordance
with an unknown or unlisted specification, the §192.5 Class locations.
yield strength determined in accordance with
§192.107(b)
8
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(a) This section classifies pipeline locations for [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended by
purposes of this part. The following criteria apply Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, 1976;
to classifications under this section. Amdt. 192-56, 52 FR 32924, Sept. 1, 1987;
(1) A "class location unit" is an onshore area Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996;
that extends 220 yards (200 meters) on either Amdt. 192-78B, 61 FR 35139, July 5, 1996;
side of the centerline of any continuous 1-mile Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998]
(1.6 kilometers) length of pipeline.
(2) Each separate dwelling unit in a multiple
dwelling unit building is counted as a separate
building intended for human occupancy.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of §192.7 Incorporation by re ference.
this section, pipeline locations are classified as
follows: (a) Any documents or portions thereof incor-
(1) A Class 1 location is: porated by reference in this part are included in
(i) An offshore area; or this part as though set out in full. When only a
(ii) Any class location unit that has 10 or portion of a document is referenced, the remain-
fewer buildings intended for human occupancy. der is not incorporated in this part.
(2) A Class 2 location is any class location (b) All incorporated materials are available for
unit that has more than 10 but fewer than 46 inspection in the Research and Special programs
buildings intended for human occupancy. Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Wash-
(3) A Class 3 location is: ington, DC, or at the National Archives and Re-
(i) Any class location unit that has 46 or more cords Administration (NARA). For information on
buildings intended for human occupancy; or the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-
(ii) An area where the pipeline lies within 100 741-6030 or go to:
yards (91 meters) of either a building or a small, http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
well-defined outside area (such as a playground, federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. These mate-
recreation area, outdoor theater, or other place of rials have been approved for incorporation by ref-
public assembly) that is occupied by 20 or more erence by the Director of the Federal Register in
persons on at least 5 days a week for 10 weeks in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
any 12-month period. (The days and weeks need 51. In addition, the incorporated materials are
not be consecutive.) available from the respective organizations listed in
(4) A Class 4 location is any class location paragraph (c) (1) of this section.
unit where buildings with four or more stories (c) The full titles of documents incorporated by
above ground are prevalent. reference, in whole or in part, are provided herein.
(c) The length of Class locations 2, 3, and 4 The numbers in parentheses indicate applicable
may be adjusted as follows: editions. For each incorporated document, cita-
(1) A Class 4 location ends 220 yards (200 tions of all affected sections are provided. Earlier
meters) from the nearest building with four or editions of currently listed documents or editions of
more stories above ground. documents listed in previous editions of 49 CFR
(2) When a cluster of buildings intended for Part 192 may be used for materials and compo-
human occupancy requires a Class 2 or 3 loca- nents designed, manufactured, or installed in ac-
tion, the class location ends 220 yards (200 me- cordance with these earlier documents at the time
ters) from the nearest building in the cluster. they were listed. The user must refer to the appro-
priate previous edition of 49 CFR Part 192 for a
listing of the earlier listed editions or documents.
9
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(1) Incorporated by reference (ibr). List of (vi) National Fire Protection Association
Organizations and Addresses. (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, P.O. Box 9101,
(i) American Gas Association (AGA), 400 Quincy, MA 02269-9101.
North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC (vii) Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI), 1825
20001. Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 680, Washington,
(ii) American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 DC 20009.
L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. (viii) NACE International (NACE), 1440
(iii) American Society for Testing and Materi- South Creek Drive, Houston, TX 77084.
als (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Con- (ix) Gas Technology Institute (GTI), 1700
shohocken, PA 19428. South Mount Prospect Road, Des Plaines, IL
(iv) ASME International (ASME), Three Park 60018.
Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990. (2) Documents incorporated by reference
(v) Manufacturers Standardization Society of (Numbers in Parentheses Indicate Applicable Edi-
the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc. (MSS), 127 tions).
Park Street, NE, Vienna, VA 22180.
C. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): §§ 192.113;Item I, Appendix B to part 192
(1) ASTM Designation: A 53/A53M-99b “Standard Specifica-
tion for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc Coated, Welded
and Seamless” (ASTM A53/A53M-99b).
(2) ASTM Designation: A106 “Standard Specification for §192.113; Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service” (A106-
99).
(3) ASTM Designation: A333/A333M “Standard Specification §192.113; Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
for Seamless and Welded Steel Pipe for Low- Temperature Service”
(ASTM A333/A333M-99).
(4) ASTM Designation: A372/A372M “Standard Specification §192.177(b)(1).
for Carbon and Alloy Steel Forgings for Thin-Walled Pressure Ve s-
sels” (ASTM A372/A372M-1999).
(5) ASTM Designation: A381 “Standard Specification for §192.113; Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
Metal-Arc-Welded Steel Pipe for Use With High-Pressure Trans-
mission Systems” (ASTM A381-1996).
(6) ASTM Designation: A671 “Standard Specification for Elec- §192.113; Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
tric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for Atmospheric and Lower Tem-
10
Revision 6/04 – Current thru 192-94, 95C & 96
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
peratures” (ASTM A671-1996).
(7) ASTM Designation: A672 “Standard Specification for Elec- §192.113; Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
tric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for High-Pre
ssure Service at Moderate Temperatures” (A672-1996).
(8) ASTM Designation: A691 “Standard Specification for Car- §192.113; Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
bon and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-Fusion-Welded for High- Pres-
sure Service at High Temperatures” (ASTM A691-1998).
(9) ASTM Designation: D638 “Standard Test Method for Ten- §§ 192.283(a)(3); 192.283(b)(1).
sile Properties of Plastics” (ASTM D638-1999).
(10) ASTM Designation: D2513-87 “Standard Specification for § 192.63(a)(1).
Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings” (ASTM
D2513-1987).
(11) ASTM Designation: D2513 “Standard Specification for §§ 192.191(b); 192.281(b)(2); 192.283(a)(1)(i);
Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings. (D2513- Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
1999).
(12) ASTM Designation: D 2517 “Standard Specification for §§ 192.191(a); 192.281(d)(1); 192.283(a)(1)(ii);
Reinforced Epoxy Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and Fittings” (D2517- Item I, Appendix B to part 192.
2000).
(7) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Divi- §§ 192.153(a); 192.153(b); 192.153(d);
sion 1, “Rules for Construction of Pressure Ve ssels” (ASME Sec- 192.165(b)(3).
tion VIII Division 1-2001).
(8) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Divi- §§ 192.153(b); 192.165(b)(3).
11
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
sion 2, “Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels: Alternative
Rules” (ASME Section VIII Division 2-2001).
(9) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX, “Weld- §192.227(a); Item II, Appendix B to part 192.
ing and Brazing Qualifications” (ASME Section IX-2001).
E. Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings § 192.147(a).
Industry, Inc. (MSS):
(1) MSS SP44-96 “Steel Pipe Line Flanges” (MSS SP-44-1996
including 1996 errata).
(2) [Reserved]
F. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA): §192.735(b).
(1) NFPA 30 “Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code”
(NFPA 30-1996).
(2) ANSI/NFPA 58 “Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code (LP-Gas §192.11(a); 192.11(b); 192.11(c).
Code)” (NFPA 58-1998).
(3) ANSI/NFPA 59 “Standard for the storage and Handling of §192.11(a); 192.11(b); 192.11(c).
Liquefied Petroleum Gases at Utility Gas Plants” (NFPA 59-1998).
(4) ANSI/NFPA 70 “National Electrical Code” (NFPA 70-1996). §§ 192.163(e); 192.189(c).
G. Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc. (PPI): §192.121.
(1) PPI TR-3/2000 “Policies and Procedures for Developing
Hydrostatic Design Bases (HDB), Pressure Design Bases (PDB),
and Minimum Required Strength (MRS) Ratings for Thermoplastic
Piping Materials “(PPI TR-3-2000-Part E only, “Policy for Determin-
ing Long Term Strength (LTHS) by Temperature Interpolation)”.
H. NACE International (NACE): §§ 192.923(b)(1); 192.925(b) Introductory text;
(1) NACE Standard RP-0502-2002 “Pipeline External Corrosion 192.925(b)(1); 192.925(b)(1)(ii); 192.925(b)(2)
Direct Assessment Methodology” (NACE RP-0502-2002). Introductory text; 192.925(b)(3) Introductory
text; 192.925(b)(3)(ii); 192.925(b)(iv);
192.925(b)(4) Introductory text;
192.925(b)(4)(ii); 192.931(d); 192.935(b)(1)(iv);
192.939(a)(2).
I. Gas Technology Institute (GTI). (Formerly Gas Research Insti- §§ 192.927(c)(2); 192.7.
tute):
(1) GRI 02/0057 “Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment of Gas
Transmission Pipelines—Methodology” (GRI 02/0057-2002).
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended gathering line must comply with the require-
by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, ments of this part applicable to transmission
1981; Amdt. 192-51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23, lines.
1986; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR, 14519, Mar.
18, 1993; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
6, 1996; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June by Amdt. 192-72, 59 FR 17281, April 12,
14, 2004] 1994; Amdt. 192-94B, 69 FR 18227, April 6,
2004]
12
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Operators of transportation pipelines on
the Outer Continental Shelf (as defined in the [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. by Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18,
1331) must identify on all their respective pipe- 1993; Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26,
lines the specific points at which operating re- 1996; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
sponsibility transfers to a producing operator. 1996]
For those instances in which the transfer points
are not identifiable by a durable marking, each
operator will have until September 15, 1998 to 192.12 [Removed]
identify the transfer points. If it is not practica-
ble to durably mark a transfer point and the [Amdt. 192-10, 37 FR 21638, Oct. 13, 1972
transfer point is located above water, the op- as amended by Amdt. 192-36, 45 FR 10769,
erator must depict the transfer point on a sche- Oct. 23, 1980]
matic located near the transfer point. If a
transfer point is located subsea, then the op- §192.13 General.
erator must identify the transfer point on a
schematic which must be maintained at the (a) No person may operate a segment of
nearest upstream facility and provided to pipeline that is readied for service after March
RSPA upon request. For those cases in which 12, 1971, or in the case of an offshore gather-
adjoining operators have not agreed on a ing line, after July 31, 1977, unless:
transfer point by September 15, 1998 the Re- (1) The pipeline has been designed, in-
gional Director and the MMS Regional Super- stalled, constructed; initially inspected, and ini-
visor will make a joint determination of the tially tested in accordance with this part; or
transfer point. (2) The pipeline qualifies for use under this
part in accordance with §192.14.
[Amdt. 192-81, 62 FR 61692, Nov. 19, (b) No person may operate a segment of
1997] pipeline that is replaced, relocated, or other-
wise changed after November 12, 1970, or in
the case of an offshore gathering line, after July
§192.11 Petroleum gas systems. 31, 1977, unless that replacement, relocation,
or change has been made in accordance with
(a) Each plant that supplies petroleum gas this part.
by pipeline to a natural gas distribution system (c) Each operator shall maintain, modify as
must meet the requirements of this part and appropriate, and follow the plans, procedures,
ANSI/NFPA 58 and 59. and programs that it is required to establish
(b) Each pipeline system subject to this under this part.
part that transports only petroleum gas or pe-
troleum gas/air mixtures must meet the re- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
quirements of this part and of ANSI/NFPA 58 by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16,
and 59. 1976; Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov. 25,
(c) In the event of a conflict between this 1977]
part and ANSI/NFPA 58 and 59,
ANSI/NFPA 58 and 59 prevail.
13
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.14 Conversion to service subject to "May" means "is permitted to" or "is au-
this part. thorized to."
"May not" means "is not permitted to" or
(a) A steel pipeline previously used in ser- "is not authorized to."
vice not subject to this part qualifies for use "Shall" is used in the mandatory and im-
under this part if the operator prepares and perative sense.
follows a written procedure to carry out the (b) In this part:
following requirements: (1) Words importing the singular include
(1) The design, construction, operation, the plural;
and maintenance history of the pipeline must be (2) Words importing the plural include the
reviewed and, where sufficient historical re- singular; and,
cords are not available, appropriate tests must (3) Words importing the masculine gender
be performed to determine if the pipeline is in a include the feminine.
satisfactory condition for safe operation. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
(2) The pipeline right-of-way, all above-
ground segments of the pipeline, and appropri-
ately selected underground segments must be §192.16 Customer notification.
visually inspected for physical defects and op-
erating conditions which reasonably could be (a) This section applies to each operator of
expected to impair the strength or tightness of a service line who does not maintain the cus-
the pipeline. tomer’s buried piping up to entry of the first
(3) All known unsafe defects and condi- building downstream, or, if the customer’s bur-
tions must be corrected in accordance with this ied piping does not enter a building, up to the
part. principal gas utilization equipment or the first
(4) The pipeline must be tested in accor- fence (or wall) that surrounds that equipment.
dance with Subpart J of this part to substanti- For the purpose of this section, “customer bur-
ate the maximum allowable operating pressure ied piping” does not include branch lines that
permitted by Subpart L of this part. serve yard lanterns, pool heaters, or other
(b) Each operator must keep for the life of types of secondary equipment. Also, “main-
the pipeline a record of investigations, tests, tain” means monitor for corrosion according to
repairs, replacements, and alterations made §192.465 if the customer’s buried piping is
under the requirements of paragraph (a) of this metallic, survey for leaks according to
section. §192.723, and if an unsafe condition is found,
shut off the flow of gas, advise the customer of
[Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov. 25, the need to repair the unsafe condition, or re-
1977] pair the unsafe condition.
(b) Each operator shall notify each cus-
tomer once in writing of the following informa-
§192.15 Rules of regulatory construction. tion:
(1) The operator does not maintain the
(a) As used in this part: customer’s buried piping.
"Includes" means “including but not limited
to.”
14
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) If the customer’s buried piping is not
maintained, it may be subject to the potential
hazards of corrosion and leakage.
(3) Buried gas piping should be–
(i) Periodically inspected for leaks;
(ii) Periodically inspected for corrosion if
the piping is metallic; and
(iii) Repaired if any unsafe condition is dis-
covered.
(4) When excavating near buried gas pip-
ing, the piping should be located in advance,
and the excavation done by hand.
(5) The operator (if applicable), plumbing
contractors, and heating contractors can assist
in locating, inspecting, and repairing the cus-
tomer’s buried piping.
(c) Each operator shall notify each cus-
tomer not later than August 14, 1996, or 90
days after the customer first receives gas at a
particular location, whichever is later. How-
ever, operators of master meter systems may
continuously post a general notice in a promi-
nent location frequented by customers.
(d) Each operator must make the following
records available for inspection by the Admin-
istrator or a State agency participating under
40 U.S.C. 60105 or 60106;
(1) A copy of the notice currently in use;
and
(2) Evidence that notices have been sent to
customers within the previous 3 years.
§192.17 [Reserved]
(a) New plastic pipe is qualified for use §192.63 Marking of materials.
under this part if:
(1) It is manufactured in accordance with a (a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of
listed specification; and this section, each valve, fitting, length of pipe,
(2) It is resistant to chemicals with which and other component must be marked–
contact may be anticipated. (1) As prescribed in the specification or
(b) Used plastic pipe is qualified for use standard to which it was manufactured, except
under this part if: that thermoplastic fittings must be marked in
(1) It was manufactured in accordance accordance with ASTM D 2513; or
with a listed specification; (2) To indicate size, material, manufacturer,
(2) It is resistant to chemicals with which pressure rating, and temperature rating, and as
contact may be anticipated; appropriate, type, grade, and model.
(3) It has been used only in natural gas ser- (b) Surfaces of pipe and components that
vice. are subject to stress from internal pressure may
(4) Its dimensions are still within the toler- not be field die stamped.
ances of the specification to which it was (c) If any item is marked by die stamping,
manufactured; and, the die must have blunt or rounded edges that
(5) It is free of visible defects. will minimize stress concentrations.
(c) For the purpose of paragraphs (a)(1) (d) Paragraph (a) of this section does not
and (b)(1) of this section, where pipe of a di- apply to items manufactured before November
ameter included in a listed specification is im- 12, 1970, that meet all of the following:
practical to use, pipe of a diameter between (1) The item is identifiable as to type,
the sizes included in a listed specification may manufacturer, and model.
be used if it: (2) Specifications or standards giving pres-
(1) Meets the strength and design criteria sure, temperature, and other appropriate crite-
required of pipe included in that listed specifi- ria for the use of items are readily available.
cation; and
(2) Is manufactured from plastic com- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
pounds which meet the criteria for material re- by Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17,
quired of pipe included in that listed specifica- 1970; Amdt. 192-31, 43 FR 13883, Apr. 3,
tion. 1978; Amdt. 192-61, 53 FR 36793, Sept. 22,
1988; Amdt. 192-61A, 54 FR 32642, Aug. 9,
1989; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5627, Feb. 6,
17
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18,
1993; Amdt. 192-76, 61 FR 26121, May 25,
1996; Amdt. 192-76A, 61 FR 36825, July
15, 1996]
18
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart C–Pipe Design F =Design factor determined in accor-
dance with §192.111.
E =Longitudinal joint factor determined in
§192.101 Scope. accordance with §192.113.
T= Temperature derating factor de-
This subpart prescribes the minimum re- termined in accordance with
quirements for the design of pipe. §192.115.
(b) If steel pipe that has been subjected to
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] cold expansion to meet the SMYS is subse-
quently heated, other than by welding or stress
relieving as a part of welding, the design pres-
§192.103 General. sure is limited to 75 percent of the pressure
determined under paragraph (a) of this section
Pipe must be designed with sufficient wall if the temperature of the pipe exceeds 900°F
thickness, or must be installed with adequate (482°C) at any time or is held above 600°F
protection, to withstand anticipated external (316°C) for more than one hour.
pressures and loads that will be imposed on the [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
pipe after installation. by Amdt. 192-47, 49 FR 7569, May. 1,
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] 1984; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998]
20
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) Steel pipe, including a pipe riser, on a Electric 1.00
platform located offshore or in inland navigable resistance
welded
waters. Electric 1.00
flash
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended welded
by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, Sub- 1.00
merged
1976] arc
welded
Furnace 0.60
§192.113 Longitudinal joint factor (E) for butt
welded
steel pipe.
Other Pipe over 0.80
4 inches
The longitudinal joint factor to be used in (102 mil-
the design formula in §192.105 is determined limeters)
in accordance with the following table: Other Pipe 4 0.60
inches
(102 mil-
Longitudinal limeters)
Specification Pipe Joint Factor or less
Class (E)
If the type of longitudinal joint cannot be de-
ASTM Seamless 1.00
Electric 1.00 termined, the joint factor to be used must not
resistance exceed that designated for "Other."
welded
Furnace 0.60 [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
butt
welded by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2,
ASTM A106 Seamless 1.00 1981; Amdt. 192-51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23,
ASTM Seamless 1.00 1986; Amdt. 192-62 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6,
A333/A333M 1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18,
Electric 1.00
1993; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
resistance
welded 1998]
ASTM A381 Double 1.00
sub-
merged §192.115 Temperature derating factor (T)
arc
welded for steel pipe.
ASTM A671 Electric- 1.00
fusion The temperature derating factor to be used
welded in the design formula in §192.105 is deter-
ASTM A672 Electric- 1.00
mined as follows:
fusion
welded
ASTM A691 Electric- 1.00 Gas Temperature in Temperature derating
fusion degrees Fahrenheit factor (T)
welded (Celsius)
API 5L Seamless 1.00 250 (121)or less 1.000
300 (149) 0.967
350 (177) 0.933
21
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
400 (204) 0.900 established at the specified tem-
450 (232) 0.867 perature, the HDB of a higher
For intermediate gas temperatures, the derating temperature may be used in deter-
factor is determined by interpolation. mining a design pressure rating at
the specified temperature by arith-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended metic interpolation using the pro-
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, cedure in Part E of PPI TR-
1998] 3/2000 entitled, Policy for Deter-
mining Long-Term Strength
(LTHS) by Temperature Interpola-
§192.117 [Reserved] tion, as published in the technical
Report TR-3/2000
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended “HDB/PDB/MRS Policies”, (ibr,
by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, see §192.7). For reinforced ther-
1981 and 46 FR 10706, Feb. 4, 1981, effec- mosetting plastic pipe, 11,000 psig
tive Mar. 31, 1981; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR (75,842 kPa).
5625, Feb. 6, 1989] t= Specified wall thickness, mm (in.)
D = Specified outside diameter, mm
§192.119 [Reserved] (in.)
SDR = Standard dimension ratio, the ratio
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended of the average specified outside di-
by Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, 1989] ameter to the minimum specified
wall thickness, corresponding to a
value from a common numbering
§192.121 Design of plastic pipe. system that was derived from the
American National Standards In-
Subject to the limitations of §192.123, the stitute preferred number series 10.
design pressure for plastic pipe is determined in
accordance with either of the following formu- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
las: by Amdt. 192-31, 43 FR 13883, Apr. 3,
1978; 43 FR 43308, Sept. 25, 1978; Amdt.
t
P = 2S 0.32 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996; Amdt.
(D − t) 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt.
2S 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
P= 0.32
( SDR − 1)
P= Design pressure, gage, kPa (psi).
S= For thermoplastic pipe, the HDB §192.123 Design limitations for plastic
determined in accordance with the pipe.
listed specification at a temperature
equal to 73 ºF (23ºC), 100ºF (a) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of
(38ºC), 120ºF (49ºC), or 140ºF this section, the design pressure may not ex-
(60ºC). In the absence an HDB ceed a gauge pressure of 125 psig (862 kPa)
for plastic pipe used in:
22
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(1) Distribution systems; or (4) The design pressure is determined in
(2) Classes 3 and 4 locations. accordance with the design equation defined in
(b) Plastic pipe may not be used where §192.121.
operating temperatures of the pipe will be:
(1) Below -20°F (-29°C), or -40°F (- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
40°C) if all pipe and pipeline components by Amdt. 192-31, 43 FR 13883, Apr. 3,
whose operating temperature will be below - 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
20°F (-29°C) have a temperature rating by the 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
manufacturer consistent with that operating 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
temperature; or 2003; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14,
(2) Above the following applicable tem- 2004]
peratures:
(i) For thermoplastic pipe, the temperature
at which the HDB used in the design formula §192.125 Design of copper pipe.
under §192.121 is determined.
(ii) For reinforced thermosetting plastic (a) Copper pipe used in mains must have a
pipe, 150°F (66°C). minimum wall thickness of 0.065 inches (1.65
(c) The wall thickness for thermoplastic millimeters) and must be hard drawn.
pipe may not be less than 0.062 inch (1.57 (b) Copper pipe used in service lines must
millimeters). have wall thickness not less than that indicated
(d) The wall thickness for reinforced ther- in following table:
mosetting plastic pipe may not be less than that
listed in the following table: Stan- Nominal. Wall thickness (inch)
dard (millimeter)
size O.D. Nominal Tolerance
Normal size in Minimum wall thickness in
(inch) (inch)
inches inches
(millime- (millime-
(millimeters) (millimeters)
ter) ter)
2 (51) 0.060 (1.52)
½ (13) 0.625 (16) .040 .0035
3 (76) 0.060 (1.52)
(1.06) (.0889)
4 (102) 0.070 (1.78)
5/8 (16) 0.750 (19) .042 .0035
6 (152) 0.100 (2.54)
(1.07) (.0889)
¾ (19) 0.875 (22) .045 .0040
(e) The design pressure for thermoplastic (1.14) (.102)
pipe produced after July 14, 2004 may exceed 1 (25) 1.125 (29) .050 .0040
(1.27) (.102)
a gauge pressure of 100 psig (689 kPa) pro-
1¼ (32) 1.375 (35) .055 .0045
vided that: (1.40) (.1143)
(1) The design pressure does not exceed 1½ (38) 1.625 (41) .060 .0045
125 psig (862 kPa); (1.52) (.1143)
(2) The material is a PE2406 or a PE3408
as specified within ASTM D2513 (ibr, see (c) Copper pipe used in mains and service
§192.7); lines may not be used at pressures in excess of
(3) The pipe size is nominal pipe size (IPS) 100 psi (689 kPa) gage.
12 or less; and (d) Copper pipe that does not have an in-
ternal corrosion resistant lining may not be used
23
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
to carry gas that has an average hydrogen sul-
fide content of more than 0.3 grains/100 ft3
(6.9/m3) under standard conditions. Standard
conditions refers to 60ºF and 14.7 psia
(15.6ºC and one atmosphere).
24
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart D–Design of Pipeline exists which might impair the strength or tight-
Components ness of the component; and
(b) The edition of the document under
§192.141 Scope. which the component was manufactured has
equal or more stringent requirements for the
This subpart prescribes minimum require- following as an edition of that document cur-
ments for the design and installation of pipeline rently or previously listed in §192.7 or appen-
components and facilities. In addition, it pre- dix B of this part:
scribes requirements relating to protection (1) Pressure testing;
against accidental overpressuring. (2) Materials; and,
(3) Pressure and temperature ratings.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
[Amdt. 192-45, 48 FR 30637, July 5, 1983;
Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
§192.143 General requirements.
27
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(1) Existing taps may be used for replace- (4) Prefabricated units that the manufac-
ment service, if they are free of cracks and turer certifies have been tested to at least twice
have good threads; and the maximum pressure to which they will be
(2) A 1¼-inch (32 millimeters) tap may be subjected under the anticipated operating con-
made in a 4-inch (102 millimeters) cast iron or ditions.
ductile iron pipe, without reinforcement. (c) Orange-peel bull plugs and orange-peel
swages may not be used on pipelines that are
However, in areas where climate, soil, and to operate at a hoop stress of 20 percent or
service conditions may create unusual external more of the SMYS of the pipe.
stresses on cast iron pipe, unreinforced taps (d) Except for flat closures designed in ac-
may be used only on 6-inch (152 millimeters) cordance with section VIII of the ASME
or larger pipe. Boiler and Pressure Code, flat closures and
fish tails may not be used on pipe that either
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended operates at 100 psi (689 kPa) gage, or more,
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, or is more than 3 inches (76 millimeters) nomi-
1998] nal diameter.
28
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(c) Each support or anchor on an exposed
§192.157 Extruded outlets. pipeline must be made of durable, noncombus-
tible material and must be designed and in-
Each extruded outlet must be suitable for stalled as follows:
anticipated service conditions and must be at (1) Free expansion and contraction of the
least equal to the design strength of the pipe pipeline between supports or anchors may not
and other fittings in the pipeline to which it is be restricted.
attached. (2) Provision must be made for the service
conditions involved.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (3) Movement of the pipeline may not
cause disengagement of the support equipment.
(d) Each support on an exposed pipeline
§192.159 Flexibility. operated at a stress level of 50 percent or
more of SMYS must comply with the follow-
Each pipeline must be designed with ing:
enough flexibility to prevent thermal expansion (1) A structural support may not be
or contraction from causing excessive stresses welded directly to the pipe.
in the pipe or components, excessive bending (2) The support must be provided by a
or unusual loads at joints, or undesirable forces member that completely encircles the pipe.
or moments at points of connection to equip- (3) If an encircling member is welded to a
ment, or at anchorage or guide points. pipe, the weld must be continuous and cover
the entire circumference.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (e) Each underground pipeline that is con-
nected to a relatively unyielding line or other
fixed object must have enough flexibility to
§192.161 Supports and anchors. provide for possible movement, or it must have
an anchor that will limit the movement of the
(a) Each pipeline and its associated equip- pipeline.
ment must have enough anchors or supports to: (f) Except for offshore pipelines, each un-
(1) Prevent undue strain on connected derground pipeline that is being connected to
equipment; new branches must have a firm foundation for
(2) Resist longitudinal forces caused by a both the header and the branch to prevent det-
bend or offset in the pipe; and, rimental lateral and vertical movement.
(3) Prevent or damp out excessive vibra-
tion. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(b) Each exposed pipeline must have by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16,
enough supports or anchors to protect the ex- 1976; Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21,
posed pipe joints from the maximum end force 1988]
caused by internal pressure and any additional
forces caused by temperature expansion or
contraction or by the weight of the pipe and its §192.163 Compressor stations: Design
contents. and construction.
29
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(a) Location of compressor building. (e) Electrical facilities. Electrical equip-
Except for a compressor building on a platform ment and wiring installed in compressor sta-
located offshore or in inland navigable waters, tions must conform to the National Electrical
each main compressor building of a compres- Code, ANSI/NFPA 70, so far as that code is
sor station must be located on property under applicable.
the control of the operator. It must be far
enough away from adjacent property, not un- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
der control of the operator, to minimize the by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16,
possibility of fire being communicated to the 1976; Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2,
compressor building from structures on adja- 1981; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18,
cent property. There must be enough open 1993; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
space around the main compressor building to 1998]
allow the free movement of fire-fighting equip-
ment. §192.165 Compressor stations:
(b) Building construction. Each building Liquid removal.
on a compressor station site must be made of
noncombustible materials if it contains either– (a) Where entrained vapors in gas may
(1) Pipe more than 2 inches (51 millime- liquefy under the anticipated pressure and tem-
ters) in diameter that is carrying gas under perature conditions, the compressor must be
pressure; or protected against the introduction of those liq-
(2) Gas handling equipment other than gas uids in quantities that could cause damage.
utilization equipment used for domestic pur- (b) Each liquid separator used to remove
poses. entrained liquids at a compressor station must:
(c) Exits. Each operating floor of a main (1) Have a manually operable means of
compressor building must have at least two removing these liquids.
separated and unobstructed exits located so as (2) Where slugs of liquid could be carried
to provide a convenient possibility of escape into the compressors, have either automatic
and an unobstructed passage to a place of liquid removal facilities, an automatic compres-
safety. Each door latch on an exit must be of a sor shutdown device, or a high liquid level
type which can be readily opened from the in- alarm; and,
side without a key. Each swinging door lo- (3) Be manufactured in accordance with
cated in an exterior wall must be mounted to section VIII of the ASME Boiler and Pressure
swing outward. Vessel Code, except that liquid separators
(d) Fenced areas. Each fence around a constructed of pipe and fittings without internal
compressor station must have at least two welding must be fabricated with a design factor
gates located so as to provide a convenient of 0.4, or less.
opportunity for escape to a place of safety, or
have other facilities affording a similarly con- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
venient exit from the area. Each gate located
within 200 feet (61 meters) of any compressor
plant building must open outward and, when §192.167 Compressor stations:
occupied, must be openable from the inside Emergency shutdown.
without a key.
30
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(a) Except for unattended field compressor (i) When the gas pressure equals the
stations of 1,000 horsepower (746 kilowatts) maximum allowable operating pressure plus 15
or less, each compressor station must have an percent or
emergency shutdown system that meets the (ii) When an uncontrolled fire occurs on the
following: platform; and
(1) It must be able to block gas out of the (2) In the case of a compressor station in a
station and blow down the station piping. building:
(2) It must discharge gas from the blow- (i) When an uncontrolled fire occurs in the
down piping at a location where the gas will building; or
not create a hazard. (ii) When the concentration of gas in air
(3) It must provide means for the shutdown reaches 50 percent or more of the lower ex-
of gas compressing equipment, gas fires, and plosive limit in a building which has a source of
electrical facilities in the vicinity of gas headers ignition.
and in the compressor building, except, that:
(i) Electrical circuits that supply emergency For the purpose of paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
lighting required to assist station personnel in this section, an electrical facility which con-
evacuating the compressor building and the forms to Class 1, Group D of the National
area in the vicinity of the gas headers must re- Electrical Code is not a source of ignition.
main energized; and
(ii) Electrical circuits needed to protect [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
equipment from damage may remain energized. by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34605, Aug. 16,
(4) It must be operable from at least two 1976; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
locations, each of which is: 1998]
(i) Outside the gas area of the station;
(ii) Near the exit gates, if the station is
fenced, or near emergency exits, if not fenced; §192.169 Compressor stations: Pre ssure
and, limiting devices.
(iii) Not more than 500 feet (153 meters)
from the limits of the station. (a) Each compressor station must have
(b) If a compressor station supplies gas pressure relief or other suitable protective de-
directly to a distribution system with no other vices of sufficient capacity and sensitivity to
adequate source of gas available, the emer- ensure that the maximum allowable operating
gency shutdown system must be designed so pressure of the station piping and equipment is
that it will not function at the wrong time and not exceeded by more than 10 percent.
cause an unintended outage on the distribution (b) Each vent line that exhausts gas from
system. the pressure relief valves of a compressor sta-
(c) On a platform located offshore or in tion must extend to a location where the gas
inland navigable waters, the emergency shut- may be discharged without hazard.
down system must be designed and installed to
actuate automatically by each of the following [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
events:
(1) In the case of an unattended compres-
sor station:
31
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.171 Compressor stations: Addi- §192.175 Pipe -type and bottle-type hold-
tional safety equipment. ers.
(a) Each compressor station must have (a) Each pipe-type and bottle-type holder
adequate fire protection facilities. If fire pumps must be designed so as to prevent the accumu-
are a part of these facilities, their operation may lation of liquids in the holder, in connecting
not be affected by the emergency shutdown pipe, or in auxiliary equipment, that might cause
system. corrosion or interfere with the safe operation of
(b) Each compressor station prime mover, the holder.
other than an electrical induction or synchro- (b) Each pipe-type or bottle-type holder
nous motor, must have an automatic device to must have minimum clearance from other hold-
shut down the unit before the speed of either ers in accordance with the following formula:
the prime mover or the driven unit exceeds a
maximum safe speed. C = (D x P x F)/48.33)
(c) Each compressor unit in a compressor
station must have a shutdown or alarm device (C = (3D x P x F)/1,000)
that operates in the event of inadequate cooling
or lubrication of the unit. in which:
(d) Each compressor station gas engine
that operates with pressure gas injection must C= Minimum clearance between pipe
be equipped so that stoppage of the engine containers or bottles in inches (mil-
automatically shuts off the fuel and vents the limeters).
engine distribution manifold. D= Outside diameter of pipe contain-
(e) Each muffler for a gas engine in a com- ers or bottles in inches (millime-
pressor station must have vent slots or holes in ters).
the baffles of each compartment to prevent gas P= Maximum allowable operating
from being trapped in the muffler. pressure, psi (kPa) gage.
F= Design factor as set forth in
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] §192.111 of this part.
(a) A miter joint on steel pipe to be oper- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
ated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2,
of 30 percent or more of SMYS may not de- 1981; Amdt. 192-52, 51 FR 20294, June 4,
flect the pipe more than 3º. 1986]
(b) A miter joint on steel pipe to be oper-
ated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress
of less than 30 percent, but more than 10 per- §192.241 Inspection and test of welds.
cent of SMYS may not deflect the pipe more
than 12½º and must be a distance equal to one (a) Visual inspection of welding must be
pipe diameter or more away from any other conducted by an individual qualified by appro-
miter joint, as measured from the crotch of priate training and experience to ensure that:
each joint. (1) The welding is performed in accor-
(c) A miter joint on steel pipe to be oper- dance with the welding procedure; and
ated at a pressure that produces a hoop stress (2) The weld is acceptable under para-
of 10 percent or less of SMYS may not deflect graph (c) of this section.
the pipe more than 90º. (b) The welds on a pipeline to be operated
at a pressure that produces a hoop stress of 20
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] percent or more of SMYS must be nonde-
structively tested in accordance with
§192.243, except that welds that are visually
41
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
inspected and approved by a qualified welding (c) Procedures must be established for the
inspector need not be nondestructively tested proper interpretation of each nondestructive
if: test of a weld to ensure the acceptability of the
(1) The pipe has a nominal diameter of less weld under §192.241(c).
than 6 inches (152 millimeters); or (d) When nondestructive testing is required
(2) The pipeline is to be operated at a under §192.241(b), the following percentages
pressure that produces a hoop stress of less of each day's field butt welds, selected at ran-
than 40 percent of SMYS and the welds are dom by the operator, must be nondestructively
so limited in number that nondestructive testing tested over their entire circumference;
is impractical. (1) In Class 1 locations, except offshore, at
(c) The acceptability of a weld that is non- least 10 percent.
destructively tested or visually inspected is de- (2) In Class 2 locations, at least 15 per-
termined according to the standards in Section cent.
9 of API Standard 1104 (ibr, see §192.7). (3) In Class 3 and Class 4 locations, at
However, if a girth weld is unacceptable under crossings of major or navigable rivers, off-
those standards for a reason other than a shore, and within railroad or public highway
crack, and if Appendix A to API 1104 applies rights-of-way, including tunnels, bridges, and
to the weld, the acceptability of the weld may overhead road crossings, 100 percent unless
be further determined under that appendix. impracticable, in which case at least 90 per-
cent. Nondestructive testing must be impracti-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended cable for each girth weld not tested.
by Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, (4) At pipeline tie-ins, including tie-ins of
1975; Amdt. 192-18A, 40 FR 27222, June replacement sections, 100 percent.
27, 1975; Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. (e) Except for a welder whose work is iso-
2, 1981; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June lated from the principal welding activity, a
6, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July sample of each welder's work for each day
13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June must be nondestructively tested, when nonde-
14, 2004] structive testing is required under §192.241(b).
(f) When nondestructive testing is required
under §192.241(b), each operator must retain,
§192.243 Nondestructive testing. for the life of the pipeline, a record showing by
milepost, engineering station, or by geographic
(a) Nondestructive testing of welds must feature, the number of girth welds made, the
be performed by any process, other than tre- number nondestructively tested, the number
panning, that will clearly indicate defects that rejected, and the disposition of the rejects.
may affect the integrity of the weld.
(b) Nondestructive testing of welds must [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
be performed: by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16,
(1) In accordance with written procedures; 1976; Amdt. 192-50, 50 FR 37191, Sept. 12,
and 1985; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
(2) By persons who have been trained and 1996]
qualified in the established procedures and with
the equipment employed in testing.
42
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
192.245 Repair or removal of defects.
43
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart F–Joining of Materials Other (c) Cast iron pipe may not be joined by
Than by Welding threaded joints.
(d) Cast iron pipe may not be joined by
brazing.
§192.271 Scope. (e) [Removed]
(a) This subpart prescribes minimum re- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
quirements for joining materials in pipelines, by Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6, 1989]
other than by welding.
(b) This subpart does not apply to joining
during the manufacture of pipe or pipeline §192.277 Ductile iron pipe.
components.
(a) Ductile iron pipe may not be joined by
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] threaded joints.
(b) Ductile iron pipe may not be joined by
brazing.
§192.273 General.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(a) The pipeline must be designed and in- by Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6, 1989,
stalled so that each joint will sustain the longi- effective Mar. 8, 1989]
tudinal pullout or thrust forces caused by con-
traction or expansion of the piping or by antici-
pated external or internal loading. §192.279 Copper pipe.
(b) Each joint must be made in accordance
with written procedures that have been proved Copper pipe may not be threaded except
by test or experience to produce strong gas that copper pipe used for joining screw fittings
tight joints. or valves may be threaded if the wall thickness
(c) Each joint must be inspected to insure is equivalent to the comparable size of Sched-
compliance with this subpart. ule 40 or heavier wall pipe listed in Table C1
of ASME/ANSI B16.5.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
by Amdt. 192-62 , 54 FR 5628, Feb. 6,
§192.275 Cast iron pipe. 1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18,
1993]
(a) Each caulked bell and spigot joint in
cast iron pipe must be sealed with mechanical
leak clamps. §192.281 Plastic pipe.
(b) Each mechanical joint in cast iron pipe
must have a gasket made of a resilient material (a) General. A plastic pipe joint that is
as the sealing medium. Each gasket must be joined by solvent cement, adhesive, or heat
suitably confined and retained under compres- fusion may not be disturbed until it has properly
sion by a separate gland or follower ring.
44
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
set. Plastic pipe may not be joined by a (2) A rigid internal tubular stiffener, other
threaded joint or miter joint. than a split tubular stiffener, must be used in
(b) Solvent cement joints. Each solvent conjunction with the coupling.
cement joint on plastic pipe must comply with
the following: [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(1) The mating surfaces of the joint must be by Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23,
clean, dry, and free of material which might be 1979; Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1635, Jan. 21,
detrimental to the joint. 1988; Amdt. 192-61, 53 FR 36793, Sept. 22,
(2) The solvent cement must conform to 1988; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18,
ASTM Designation: D 2513. 1993; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
(3) The joint may not be heated to acceler- 1996]
ate the setting of the cement.
(c) Heat-fusion joints. Each heat-fusion
joint on plastic pipe must comply with the fol- §192.283 Plastic pipe; qualifying joining
lowing: procedures.
(1) A butt heat-fusion joint must be joined
by a device that holds the heater element (a) Heat fusion, solvent cement, and adhe-
square to the ends of the piping, compresses sive joints. Before any written procedure es-
the heated ends together, and holds the pipe in tablished under §192.273(b) is used for mak-
proper alignment while the plastic hardens. ing plastic pipe joints by a heat fusion, solvent
(2) A socket heat-fusion joint must be cement, or adhesive method, the procedure
joined by a device that heats the mating sur- must be qualified by subjecting specimen joints
faces of the joint uniformly and simultaneously made according to the procedure to the fol-
to essentially the same temperature. lowing tests:
(3) An electrofusion joint must be joined (1) The burst test requirements of–
utilizing the equipment and techniques of the (i) In the case of thermoplastic pipe, para-
fittings manufacturer or equipment and tech- graph 6.6 (sustained pressure test) or para-
niques shown, by testing joints to the require- graph 6.7 (Minimum Hydrostatic Burst Test) or
ments of §192.283(a)(1)(iii), to be at least paragraph 8.9 ( Sustained Static pressure Test)
equivalent to those of the fittings manufacturer. of ASTM D2513 (ibr, see §192.7);
(4) Heat may not be applied with a torch (ii) In the case of thermosetting plastic pipe,
or other open flame. paragraph 8.5 (Minimum Hydrostatic Burst
(d) Adhesive joints. Each adhesive joint Pressure) or paragraph 8.9 (Sustained Static
on plastic pipe must comply with the following: Pressure Test) of ASTM D2517; (ibr, see
(1) The adhesive must conform to ASTM §192.7); or
Designation: D 2517. (iii) In the case of electrofusion fittings for
(2) The materials and adhesive must be polyethylene pipe and tubing, paragraph 9.1
compatible with each other. (Minimum Hydraulic Burst Pressure Test),
(e) Mechanical joints. Each compression paragraph 9.2 (Sustained Pressure Test), para-
type mechanical joint on plastic pipe must graph 9.3 (Tensile Strength Test), or paragraph
comply with the following: 9.4 (Joint Integrity Tests) of ASTM Designation
(1) The gasket material in the coupling F1055, (ibr, see §192.7).
must be compatible with the plastic.
45
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) For procedures intended for lateral lowest value of the five test results or the
pipe connections, subject a specimen joint manufacturer's rating, whichever is lower must
made from pipe sections joined at right angles be used in the design calculations for stress.
according to the procedure to a force on the (6) Each specimen that fails at the grips
lateral pipe until failure occurs in the specimen. must be retested using new pipe.
If failure initiates outside the joint area, the pro- (7) Results obtained pertain only to the
cedure qualifies for use; and, specific outside diameter, and material of the
(3) For procedures intended for non-lateral pipe tested, except that testing of a heavier wall
pipe connections, follow the tensile test re- pipe may be used to qualify pipe of the same
quirements of ASTM D638 (ibr, see §192.7), material but with a lesser wall thickness.
except that the test may be conducted at ambi- (c) A copy of each written procedure be-
ent temperature and humidity If the specimen ing used for joining plastic pipe must be avail-
elongates no less than 25 percent or failure ini- able to the persons making and inspecting
tiates outside the joint area, the procedure joints.
qualifies for use. (d) Pipe or fittings manufactured before
(b) Mechanical joints. Before any written July 1, 1980, may be used in accordance with
procedure established under §192.273(b) is procedures that the manufacturer certifies will
used for making mechanical plastic pipe joints produce a joint as strong as the pipe.
that are designed to withstand tensile forces,
the procedure must be qualified by subjecting [Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979
five specimen joints made according to the as amended by Amdt. 192-34A, 45 FR 9931,
procedure to the following tensile test: Feb. 14, 1980; Amdt. 192-34B, 46 FR 39,
(1) Use an apparatus for the test as speci- Jan. 2, 1981; Amdt. 192-34(1), 47 FR
fied in ASTM D 638 (except for conditioning), 32720, July 29, 1982; Amdt. 192-34(2), 47
(ibr, see §192.7). FR 49973, Nov. 4, 1982; Amdt. 192-68, 58
(2) The specimen must be of such length FR 14519, Mar. 18, 1993; Amdt. 192-78, 61
that the distance between the grips of the ap- FR 28770, June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63
paratus and the end of the stiffener does not FR 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69
affect the joint strength. FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
(3) The speed of testing is 0.20 in. (5.0
mm) per minute, plus or minus 25 percent.
(4) Pipe specimens less than 4 in. (102 §192.285 Plastic pipe; qualifying pe rsons
mm) in diameter are qualified if the pipe yields to make joints.
to an elongation of no less than 25 percent or
failure initiates outside the joint area. (a) No person may make a plastic pipe
(5) Pipe specimens 4 in. (102 mm) and joint unless that person has been qualified un-
larger in diameter shall be pulled until the pipe der the applicable joining procedure by:
is subjected to a tensile stress equal to or (1) Appropriate training or experience in
greater than the maximum thermal stress that the use of the procedure; and
would be produced by a temperature change (2) Making a specimen joint from pipe
of sections joined according to the procedure that
100°F (38°C) or until the pipe is pulled from passes the inspection and test set forth in para-
the fitting. If the pipe pulls from the fitting, the graph (b) of this section.
46
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(b) The specimen joint must be: §192.287 Plastic pipe; inspection of joints.
(1) Visually examined during and after as-
sembly or joining and found to have the same
appearance as a joint or photographs of a joint No person may carry out the inspection of
that is acceptable under the procedure; and joints in plastic pipes required by
(2) In the case of a heat fusion, solvent §§192.273(c) and 192.285(b) unless that per-
cement, or adhesive joint; son has been qualified by appropriate training
(i) Tested under any one of the test meth- or experience in evaluating the acceptability of
ods listed under §192.283(a) applicable to the plastic pipe joints made under the applicable
type of joint and material being tested; joining procedure.
(ii) Examined by ultrasonic inspection and
found not to contain flaws that would cause [Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, 1979]
failure; or
(iii) Cut into at least three longitudinal
straps, each of which is:
(A) Visually examined and found not to
contain voids or discontinuities on the cut sur-
faces of the joint area; and
(B) Deformed by bending, torque, or im-
pact, and if failure occurs, it must not initiate in
the joint area.
(c) A person must be requalified under an
applicable procedure, if during any 12-month
period that person:
(1) Does not make any joints under that
procedure; or
(2) Has 3 joints or 3 percent of the joints
made, whichever is greater, under that proce-
dure that are found unacceptable by testing
under §192.513.
(d) Each operator shall establish a method
to determine that each person making joints in
plastic pipelines in the operator's system is
qualified in accordance with this section.
47
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart G–General Construction Re- §192.309 Repair of steel pipe.
quirements for Transmission Lines and
Mains. (a) Each imperfection or damage that im-
pairs the serviceability of a length of steel pipe
must be repaired or removed. If a repair is
§192.301 Scope. made by grinding, the remaining wall thickness
must a least be equal to either:
This subpart prescribes minimum require- (1) The minimum thickness required by the
ments for constructing transmission lines and tolerances in the specification to which the pipe
mains. was manufactured; or
(2) The nominal wall thickness required
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] for the design pressure of the pipeline.
(b) Each of the following dents must be
removed from steel pipe to be operated at a
§192.303 Compliance with specifications pressure that produces a hoop stress of 20
or standards. percent, or more, of SMYS, unless the dent is
repaired by a method that reliable engineering
Each transmission line or main must be tests and analyses show can permanently re-
constructed in accordance with comprehensive store the serviceability of the pipe:
written specifications or standards that are (1) A dent that contains a stress concentra-
consistent with this part. tor such as a scratch, gouge, groove, or arc
burn.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (2) A dent that affects the longitudinal weld
or a circumferential weld.
(3) In pipe to be operated at a pressure
§192.305 Inspection: General. that produces a hoop stress of 40 percent or
more of SMYS, a dent that has a depth of:
Each transmission line or main must be in- (i) More than ¼ inch (6.4 millimeters) in
spected to ensure that it is constructed in ac- pipe 12¾ inches (324 millimeters) or less in
cordance with this part. outer diameter; or
(ii) More than 2 percent of the nominal
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] pipe diameter in pipe over 12¾ inches (324
millimeters) in outer diameter.
50
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
turer's recommended maximum period of ex-
posure or 2 years, whichever is less.
(2) The pipe either is located where dam-
age by external forces is unlikely or is other-
wise protected against such damage.
§192.321 Installation of plastic pipe. (3) The pipe adequately resists exposure to
ultraviolet light and high and low temperatures.
(a) Plastic pipe must be installed below (h) Plastic pipe may be installed on bridges
ground level except as provided by paragraphs provided that it is:
(g) and (h) of this section. (1) Installed with protection from mechani-
(b) Plastic pipe that is installed in a vault or cal damage, such as installation in a metallic
any other below grade enclosure must be casing;
completely encased in gas-tight metal pipe and (2) Protected from ultraviolet radiation; and
fittings that are adequately protected from cor- (3) Not allowed to exceed the pipe tem-
rosion. perature limits specified in §192.123.
(c) Plastic pipe must be installed so as to
minimize shear or tensile stresses. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(d) Thermoplastic pipe that is not encased by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
must have a minimum wall thickness of 0.090 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
inch (2.29 millimeters), except that pipe with an 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
outside diameter of 0.875 inch (22.3 millime- 2003; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14,
ters) or less may have a minimum wall thick- 2004]
ness of 0.062 inch (1.58 millimeters).
(e) Plastic pipe that is not encased must
have an electrically conducting wire or other §192.323 Casing.
means of locating the pipe while it is under-
ground. Tracer wire may not be wrapped Each casing used on a transmission line or
around the pipe and contact with the pipe must main under a railroad or highway must comply
be minimized but is not prohibited. Tracer wire with the following:
or other metallic elements installed for pipe lo- (a) The casing must be designed to with-
cating purposes must be resistant to corrosion stand the superimposed loads.
damage, either by use of coated copper wire (b) If there is a possibility of water entering
or by other means. the casing, the ends must be sealed.
(f) Plastic pipe that is being encased must (c) If the ends of an unvented casing are
be inserted into the casing pipe in a manner that sealed and the sealing is strong enough to retain
will protect the plastic. The leading end of the the maximum allowable operating pressure of
plastic must be closed before insertion. the pipe, the casing must be designed to hold
(g) Uncased plastic pipe may be temporar- this pressure at a stress level of not more than
ily installed above ground level under the fol- 72 percent of SMYS.
lowing conditions: (d) If vents are installed on a casing, the
(1) The operator must be able to demon- vents must be protected from the weather to
strate that the cumulative aboveground expo- prevent water from entering the casing.
sure of the pipe does not exceed the manufac-
51
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
Normal Consolidated
Location soil rock
Inches Inches
(Millime- (Millimeters)
ters)
§192.325 Underground clearance. Class 1 loca- 30 (762) 18 (457)
tions
Class 2, 3, and 4 36 (914) 24 (610)
(a) Each transmission line must be installed
locations
with at least 12 inches (305 millimeters) of Drainage 36 (914) 24 (610)
clearance from any other underground struc- ditches of pub-
ture not associated with the transmission line. lic roads and
If this clearance cannot be attained, the trans- railroad cross-
ings
mission line must be protected from damage
that might result from the proximity of the other
(b) Except as provided in paragraphs (c)
structure.
and (d) of this section, each buried main must
(b) Each main must be installed with
be installed with at least 24 inches (610 milli-
enough clearance from any other underground
meters) of cover.
structure to allow proper maintenance and to
(c) Where an underground structure pre-
protect against damage that might result from
vents the installation of a transmission line or
proximity to other structures.
main with the minimum cover, the transmission
(c) In addition to meeting the requirements
line or main may be installed with less cover if it
of paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section, each
is provided with additional protection to with-
plastic transmission line or main must be in-
stand anticipated external loads.
stalled with sufficient clearance, or must be in-
(d) A main may be installed with less than
sulated, from any source of heat so as to pre-
24 inches (610 millimeters) of cover if the law
vent the heat from impairing the serviceability
of the State or municipality:
of the pipe.
(1) Establishes a minimum cover of less
(d) Each pipe-type or bottle-type holder
than 24 inches (610 millimeters);
must be installed with a minimum clearance
(2) Requires that mains be installed in a
from any other holder as prescribed in
common trench with other utility lines; and,
§192.175(b).
(3) Provides adequately for prevention of
damage to the pipe by external forces.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
(e) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
this section, all pipe installed in a navigable
1998]
river, stream, or harbor must be installed with a
minimum cover of 48 inches (1219 millimeters)
in soil or 24 inches (610 millimeters) in con-
§192.327 Cover.
solidated rock between the top of the pipe and
the natural bottom (as determined by recog-
(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (c),
nized and generally accepted practices).
(e), (f), and (g) of this section, each buried
(f) All pipe installed offshore, except in the
transmission line must be installed with a mini-
Gulf of Mexico and its inlets, under water not
mum cover as follows:
52
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
more than 200 feet (60 meters) deep, as
measured from the mean low tide, must be in-
stalled as follows:
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of
this section, pipe under water less than 12 feet
(3.66 meters) deep, must be installed with a
minimum cover of 36 inches (914 millimeters)
in soil or 18 inches (457 millimeters) in con-
solidated rock between the top of the pipe and
the natural bottom.
(2) Pipe under water at least 12 feet (3.66
meters) deep must be installed so that the top
of the pipe is below the natural bottom, unless
the pipe is supported by stanchions, held in
place by anchors or heavy concrete coating, or
protected by an equivalent means.
(g) All pipelines installed under water in the
Gulf of Mexico and its inlets, as defined in
§192.3, must be installed in accordance with
§192.612(b)(3).
53
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart H–Customer Meters, Service §192.355 Customer meters and regula-
Regulators, and Service Lines tors: Protection from damage.
54
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(d) Each regulator that might release gas in (c) Grading for drainage. Where conden-
its operation must be vented to the outside at- sate in the gas might cause interruption in the
mosphere. gas supply to the customer, the service line
must be graded so as to drain into the main or
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] into drips at the low points in the service line.
(d) Protection against piping strain and ex-
ternal loading. Each service line must be in-
§192.359 Customer meter installations: stalled so as to minimize anticipated piping
Operating pressure. strain and external loading.
(e) Installation of service lines into build-
(a) A meter may not be used at a pressure ings. Each underground service line installed
that is more than 67 percent of the manufac- below grade through the outer foundation wall
turer's shell test pressure. of a building must:
(b) Each newly installed meter manufac- (1) In the case of a metal service line, be
tured after November 12, 1970, must have protected against corrosion;
been tested to a minimum of 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) (2) In the case of a plastic service line, be
gage. protected from shearing action and backfill set-
(c) A rebuilt or repaired tinned steel case tlement; and
meter may not be used at a pressure that is (3) Be sealed at the foundation wall to pre-
more than 50 percent of the pressure used to vent leakage into the building.
test the meter after rebuilding or repairing. (f) Installation of service lines under build-
ings. Where an underground service line is
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended installed under a building:
by Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17660, Nov. 17, (1) It must be encased in a gas tight con-
1970; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, duit;
1998] (2) The conduit and the service line must, if
the service line supplies the building it underlies,
extend into a normally usable and accessible
§192.361 Service lines: Installation. part of the building; and,
(3) The space between the conduit and the
(a) Depth. Each buried service line must service line must be sealed to prevent gas leak-
be installed with at least 12 inches (305 milli- age into the building and, if the conduit is
meters) of cover in private property and at sealed at both ends, a vent line from the annu-
least 18 inches (457 millimeters) of cover in lar space must extend to a point where gas
streets and roads. However, where an under- would not be a hazard, and extend above
ground structure prevents installation at those grade, terminating in a rain and insect resistant
depths, the service line must be able to with- fitting.
stand any anticipated external load. (g) Locating underground service lines.
(b) Support and backfill. Each service line Each underground nonmetallic service line that
must be properly supported on undisturbed or is not encased must have a means of locating
well-compacted soil, and material used for the pipe that complies with §192.321(e).
backfill must be free of materials that could
damage the pipe or its coating.
55
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended covered durable curb box or standpipe that
by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, allows ready operation of the valve and is sup-
1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, ported independently of the service lines.
1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
2003]
§192.367 Service lines: General require-
ments for connections to main piping.
§192.363 Service lines: Valve require-
ments. (a) Location. Each service line connection
to a main must be located at the top of the
(a) Each service line must have a service main or, if that is not practical, at the side of the
line valve that meets the applicable require- main, unless a suitable protective device is in-
ments of Subparts B and D of this part. A stalled to minimize the possibility of dust and
valve incorporated in a meter bar, that allows moisture being carried from the main into the
the meter to be bypassed, may not be used as service line.
a service line valve. (b) Compression-type connection to main.
(b) A soft seat service line valve may not Each compression-type service line to main
be used if its ability to control the flow of gas connection must:
could be adversely affected by exposure to (1) Be designed and installed to effectively
anticipated heat. sustain the longitudinal pullout or thrust forces
(c) Each service line valve on a high- caused by contraction or expansion of the pip-
pressure service line, installed above ground or ing, or by anticipated external or internal load-
in an area where the blowing of gas would be ing; and
hazardous, must be designed and constructed (2) If gaskets are used in connecting the
to minimize the possibility of the removal of the service line to the main connection fitting, have
core of the valve with other than specialized gaskets that are compatible with the kind of
tools. gas in the system.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] [Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26,
1996]
§192.373 Service lines: Cast iron and Each copper service line installed within a
ductile iron. building must be protected against external
damage.
(a) Cast or ductile iron pipe less than 6
inches (152 millimeters) in diameter may not be [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
installed for service lines.
(b) If cast iron pipe or ductile iron pipe is
installed for use as a service line, the part of the §192.379 New service lines not in use.
service line which extends through the building
wall must be of steel pipe. Each service line that is not placed in ser-
(c) A cast iron or ductile iron service line vice upon completion of installation must com-
may not be installed in unstable soil or under a ply with one of the following until the customer
building. is supplied with gas:
(a) The valve that is closed to prevent the
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended flow of gas to the customer must be provided
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, with a locking device or other means designed
1998] to prevent the opening of the valve by persons
other than those authorized by the operator.
(b) A mechanical device or fitting that will
§192.375 Service lines: Plastic. prevent the flow of gas must be installed in the
service line or in the meter assembly.
(a) Each plastic service line outside a build- (c) The customer's piping must be physi-
ing must be installed below ground level, ex- cally disconnected from the gas supply and the
cept that– open pipe ends sealed.
(1) It may be installed in accordance with
§192.321(g); and [Amdt. 192-8, 37 FR 20694, Oct. 1972]
57
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.381 Service lines: Excess flow valve (d) An operator shall locate an excess flow
performance standards. valve as near as practical to the fitting connect-
ing the service line to its source of gas supply.
(a) Excess flow valves to be used on single (e) An operator should not install an excess
residence service lines that operate continu- flow valve on a service line where the operator
ously throughout the year at a pressure not less has prior experience with contaminants in the
than 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa0 gage must be manufac- gas stream, where these contaminants could be
tured and tested by the manufacturer according expected to cause the excess flow valve to
to an industry specification, or the manufac- malfunction or where the excess flow valve
turer's written specification, to ensure that each would interfere with necessary operation and
valve will: maintenance activities on the service, such as
(1) Function properly up to the maximum blowing liquids from the line.
operating pressure at which the valve is rated;
(2) Function properly at all temperatures [Amdt. 192-79, 61 FR 31449, June 20, 1996
reasonably expected in the operating environ- as amended by Amdt. 192-80, 62 FR 2618,
ment of the service line; Jan. 17, 1997; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500,
(3) At 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage: July 13, 1998]
(i) Close at, or not more than 50 percent
above, the rated closure flow rate specified by
the manufacturer; and §192.383 Excess flow valve customer no-
(ii) Upon closure, reduce gas flow– tification.
(A) For an excess flow valve designed to
allow pressure to equalize across the valve, to (a) Definitions. As used in this section:
no more than 5 percent of the manufacturer's
specified closure flow rate, up to a maximum of Costs associated with installation
20 cubic feet per hour (0.57 cubic meters per means the costs directly connected with install-
hour); or ing an excess flow valve, for example, costs of
(B) For an excess flow valve designed to parts, labor, inventory and procurement. It
prevent equalization of pressure across the does not include maintenance and replacement
valve, to no more than 0.4 cubic feet per hour costs until such costs are incurred.
(.01 cubic meters per hour); and
Replaced service line means a natural
(4) Not close when the pressure is less
gas service line where the fitting that connects
than the manufacturer's minimum specified op-
the service line to the main is replaced or the
erating pressure and the flow rate is below the
piping connected to this fitting is replaced.
manufacturer's minimum specified closure flow
rate.
Service line customer means the person
(b) An excess flow valve must meet the
who pays the gas bill, or where service has not
applicable requirements of Subparts B and D
yet been established, the person requesting
of this part.
service.
(c) An operator must mark or otherwise
identify the presence of an excess flow valve
(b) Which customers must receive noti-
on the service line.
fication. Notification is required on each
58
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
newly installed service line or replaced service (1) An operator must make the following
line that operates continuously throughout the records available for inspection by the Admin-
year at a pressure not less than 68.9 m (10 istrator or a State agency participating under
psig) and that serves a single residence. On 49 U.S.C. 60105 or 60106:
these lines an operator of a natural gas distribu- (i) A copy of the notice currently in use,
tion system must notify the service line cus- and
tomer once in writing. (ii) Evidence that notice has been sent to
(c) What to put in the written notice. the service line customers set forth in para-
(1) An explanation for the customer that an graph (b) of this section, within the previous
excess flow valve meeting the performance three years.
standards prescribed under §192.381 is avail- (2) [Reserved]
able for the operator to install if the customer (f) When notification is not required.
bears the costs associated with installation; The notification requirements do not apply
(2) An explanation for the customer of the if the operator can demonstrate–
potential safety benefits that may be derived (1) That the operator will voluntarily install
from installing an excess flow valve. The ex- an excess flow valve or that the state or local
planation must include that an excess flow jurisdiction requires installation;
valve is designed to shut off the flow of natural (2) That excess flow valves meeting the
gas automatically if the service line breaks; performance standards of §192.381 are not
(3) A description of installation, mainte- available to the operator;
nance, and replacement costs. The notice must (3) That an operator has prior experience
explain that if the customer requests the opera- with contaminants in the gas stream that could
tor to install an EFV, the customer bears all interfere with the operation of an excess flow
costs associated with installation, and what valve, cause loss of service to a residence, or
those costs are. The notice must alert the cus- interfere with necessary operation or mainte-
tomer that costs for maintaining and replacing nance activities, such as blowing liquids from
an EFV may later be incurred, and what those the line.
costs will be, to the extent known. (4) That an emergency or short time notice
(d) When notification and installation replacement situation made it impractical for
must be made. the operator to notify a service line customer
(1) After February 3, 1999 an operator before replacing a service line. Examples of
must notify each service line customer set forth these situations would be where an operator
in paragraph (b) of this section: has to replace a service line quickly because
of–
(i) On new service lines when the customer
(i) Third party excavation damage;
applies for service.
(ii) Grade 1 leaks as defined in the Appen-
(ii) On replaced service lines when the op-
dix G–192-11 of the Gas Piping Technology
erator determines the service line will be re-
Committee guide for gas transmission and dis-
placed.
tribution systems;
(2) If a service line customer requests in-
(iii) A short notice service line relocation
stallation an operator must install the EFV at a
request.
mutually agreeable date.
(e) What records are required.
[Amdt. 192-83, 63 FR 5464, Feb. 3, 1998]
59
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart I–Requirements for Corrosion §192.453 General.
Control
The corrosion control procedures required
by §192.605(b)(2), including those for the de-
§192.451 Scope. sign, installation, operation, and maintenance of
cathodic protection systems, must be carried
(a) This subpart prescribes minimum re- out by, or under the direction of, a person
quirements for the protection of metallic pipe- qualified in pipeline corrosion control methods.
lines from external, internal, and atmospheric
corrosion. [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
(b) [Reserved] as amended by Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575,
Feb. 11, 1994]
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
as amended by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598,
Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, §192.455 External corrosion control: Bur-
Sept. 5, 1978] ied or submerged pipelines installed after
July 31, 1971.
62
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(c) The amount of cathodic protection must (e) After the initial evaluation required by
be controlled so as not to damage the protec- §§ 192.455(b) and (c) and 192.457(b), each
tive coating or the pipe. operator must, not less than every 3 years at
intervals not exceeding 39 months, reevaluate
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971] its unprotected pipelines and cathodically pro-
tect them in accordance with this subpart in
areas in which active corrosion is found. The
§192.465 External corrosion control: operator must determine the areas of active
Monitoring. corrosion by electrical survey. However, on
distribution lines and where an electrical survey
(a) Each pipeline that is under cathodic is impractical on transmission lines, areas of
protection must be tested at least once each active corrosion may be determined by other
calendar year, but with intervals not exceeding means that include review and analysis of leak
15 months, to determine whether the cathodic repair and inspection records, corrosion moni-
protection meets the requirements of toring records, exposed pipe inspection re-
§192.463. However, if tests at those intervals cords, and the pipeline environment. In this
are impractical for separately protected short section:
sections of mains or transmission lines, not in (1) Active corrosion means continuing cor-
excess of 100 feet (30 meters), or separately rosion which, unless controlled, could result in
protected service lines, these pipelines may be a condition that is detrimental to public safety.
surveyed on a sampling basis. At least 10 per- (2) Electrical survey means a series of
cent of these protected structures, distributed closely spaced pipe-to-soil readings over a
over the entire system must be surveyed each pipeline that are subsequently analyzed to iden-
calendar year, with a different 10 percent tify locations where a corrosive current is leav-
checked each subsequent year, so that the en- ing the pipeline.
tire system is tested in each 10-year period. (3) Pipeline environment includes soil resis-
(b) Each cathodic protection rectifier or tivity (high or low), soil moisture (wet or dry),
other impressed current power source must be soil contaminants that may promote corrosive
inspected six times each calendar year, but activity, and other known conditions that could
with intervals not exceeding 2½ months, to in- affect the probability of active corrosion.
sure that it is operating.
(c) Each reverse current switch, each di- [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
ode, and each interference bond whose failure as amended by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598,
would jeopardize structure protection must be Aug. 16, 1976; Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389,
electrically checked for proper performance six Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-35, 44 FR 75381,
times each calendar year, but with intervals not Dec. 20, 1979; Amdt. 192-35A, 45 FR
exceeding 2½ months. Each other interference 23441, Apr. 7, 1980; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR
bond must be checked at least once each cal- 37500, July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR
endar year, but with intervals not exceeding 15 53895, Sept. 15, 2003]
months.
(d) Each operator shall take prompt reme-
dial action to correct any deficiencies indicated
by the monitoring.
63
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.467 External corrosion control: §192.469 External corrosion control: Test
Electrical isolation. stations.
(a) Each buried or submerged pipeline Each pipeline under cathodic protection
must be electrically isolated from other under- required by this subpart must have sufficient
ground metallic structures, unless the pipeline test stations or other contact points for electri-
and the other structures are electrically inter- cal measurement to determine the adequacy of
connected and cathodically protected as a sin- cathodic protection.
gle unit.
(b) One or more insulating devices must be [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
installed where electrical isolation of a portion as amended by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34606,
of a pipeline is necessary to facilitate the appli- Aug. 16, 1976]
cation of corrosion control.
(c) Except for unprotected copper inserted
in a ferrous pipe, each pipeline must be electri- 192.471 External corrosion control: Test
cally isolated from metallic casings that are a leads.
part of the underground system. However, if (a) Each test lead wire must be connected
isolation is not achieved because it is impracti- to the pipeline so as to remain mechanically
cal, other measures must be taken to minimize secure and electrically conductive.
corrosion of the pipeline inside the casing. (b) Each test lead wire must be attached to
(d) Inspection and electrical tests must be the pipeline so as to minimize stress concentra-
made to assure that electrical isolation is ade- tion on the pipe.
quate. (c) Each bared test lead wire and bared
(e) An insulating device may not be in- metallic area at point of connection to the pipe-
stalled in an area where a combustible atmos- line must be coated with an electrical insulating
phere is anticipated unless precautions are material compatible with the pipe coating and
taken to prevent arcing. the insulation on the wire.
(f) Where a pipeline is located in close
proximity to electrical transmission tower foot- [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971]
ings, ground cables or counterpoise, or in other
areas where fault currents or unusual risk of
lightning may be anticipated, it must be pro- §192.473 External corrosion control: In-
vided with protection against damage due to terference currents.
fault currents or lightning, and protective meas-
ures must also be taken at insulating devices. (a) Each operator whose pipeline system is
subjected to stray currents shall have in effect a
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, continuing program to minimize the detrimental
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, effects of such currents.
Sept. 5, 1978] (b) Each impressed current type cathodic
protection system or galvanic anode system
must be designed and installed so as to mini-
mize any adverse effects on existing adjacent
underground metallic structures.
64
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, to minimize internal corrosion. Each coupon or
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, other means of monitoring internal corrosion
Sept. 5, 1978] must be checked two times each calendar
year, but with interval not exceeding 7½
months.
§192.475 Internal corrosion control:
General. [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389,
(a) Corrosive gas may not be transported Sept. 5, 1978]
by pipeline, unless the corrosive effect of the
gas on the pipeline has been investigated and
steps have been taken to minimize internal cor- §192.479 Atmospheric corrosion control:
rosion. General.
(b) Whenever any pipe is removed from a
pipeline for any reason, the internal surface (a) Each operator must clean and coat
must be inspected for evidence of corrosion. If each pipeline or portion of pipeline that is ex-
internal corrosion is found– posed to the atmosphere, except pipelines un-
(1) The adjacent pipe must be investigated der paragraph (c) of this section.
to determine the extent of internal corrosion: (b) Coating material must be suitable for
(2) Replacement must be made to the ex- the prevention of atmospheric corrosion.
tent required by the applicable paragraphs of (c) Except portions of pipelines in offshore
§§ 192.485, 192.487, or 192,489; and, splash zones or soil-to-air interfaces, the op-
(3) Steps must be taken to minimize the erator need not protect from atmospheric cor-
internal corrosion. rosion any pipeline for which the operator
(c) Gas containing more than 0.25 grain of demonstrates by test, investigation, or experi-
hydrogen sulfide per 100 cubic feet (5.8 milli- ence appropriate to the environment of the
grams/m3) at standard conditions (4 parts per pipeline that corrosion will—
million) may not be stored in pipe-type or bot- (1) Only be a light surface oxide; or
tle-type holders. (2) Not affect the safe operation of the
pipeline before the next scheduled inspection.
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389,
June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895,
July 13, 1998] Sept. 15, 2003]
If corrosive gas is being transported, cou- (a) Each operator must inspect each pipe-
pons or other suitable means must be used to line or portion of pipeline that is exposed to the
determine the effectiveness of the steps taken
65
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
atmosphere for evidence of atmospheric corro- (c) Except for cast iron or ductile iron pipe,
sion, as follows: each segment of buried or submerged pipe that
is required to be repaired because of external
If the pipeline is lo- Then the frequency of corrosion must be cathodically protected in
cated: inspection is: accordance with this subpart.
Onshore At least once every 3 cal-
endar years, but with in-
tervals not exceeding 39 [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971]
months
Offshore At least once each calen-
dar year, but with intervals
§192.485 Remedial measures:
not exceeding 15 months
Transmission lines.
(b) During inspections the operator must
(a) General corrosion. Each segment of
give particular attention to pipe at soil-to-air
transmission line with general corrosion and
interfaces, under thermal insulation, under dis-
with a remaining wall thickness less than that
bonded coatings, at pipe supports, in splash
required for the MAOP of the pipeline must be
zones, at deck penetrations, and in spans over
replaced or the operating pressure reduced
water.
commensurate with the strength of the pipe
(c) If atmospheric corrosion is found during
based on actual remaining wall thickness.
an inspection, the operator must provide pro-
However, corroded pipe may be repaired by a
tection against the corrosion as required by
method that reliable engineering tests and
§192.479.
analyses show can permanently restore the
serviceability of the pipe. Corrosion pitting so
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971,
closely grouped as to affect the overall strength
as amended by Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895,
of the pipe is considered general corrosion for
Sept. 15, 2003]
the purpose of this paragraph.
(b) Localized corrosion pitting. Each
segment of transmission line pipe with localized
§192.483 Remedial measures: General.
corrosion pitting to a degree where leakage
might result must be replaced or repaired, or
(a) Each segment of metallic pipe that re-
the operating pressure must be reduced com-
places pipe removed from a buried or sub-
mensurate with the strength of the pipe, based
merged pipeline because of external corrosion
on the actual remaining wall thickness in the
must have a properly prepared surface and
pits.
must be provided with an external protective
(c) Under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
coating that meets the requirements of
section, the strength of pipe based on actual
§192.461.
remaining wall thickness may be determined by
(b) Each segment of metallic pipe that re-
the procedure in ASME/ANSI B31G or the
places pipe removed from a buried or sub-
procedure in AGA Pipeline Research Commit-
merged pipeline because of external corrosion
tee Project PR 3-805 (with RSTRENG disk).
must be cathodically protected in accordance
Both procedures apply to corroded regions
with this subpart.
that do not penetrate the pipe wall, subject to
the limitations prescribed in the procedures.
66
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971, fracture or any leakage might result, must be
as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39389, replaced.
Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, (b) Localized graphitization. Each segment
June 6, 1996; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69660, of cast iron or ductile iron pipe on which local-
Dec. 14, 1999] ized graphitization is found to a degree where
any leakage might result, must be replaced or
repaired, or sealed by internal sealing methods
§192.487 Remedial measures: Distribu- adequate to prevent or arrest any leakage.
tion lines other than cast iron or ductile
iron lines. [Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12297, June 30, 1971]
67
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart J–Test Requirements requirements of this subpart, but each non-
welded joint must be leak tested at not less
§192.501 Scope. than its operating pressure.
This subpart prescribes minimum leak-test [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
and strength-test requirements for pipelines. by Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21,
1988; Amdt. 192-60, 53 FR 36028, Sept. 16,
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] 1988; Amdt. 192-60A, 54 FR 5485, Feb. 3,
1989]
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended Except for service lines and plastic pipe-
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, lines, each segment of a pipeline that is to be
1998; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, operated below 100 p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage
2004] must be leak tested in accordance with the fol-
lowing:
(a) The test procedure used must ensure
§192.507 Test requirements for pipelines discovery of all potentially hazardous leaks in
to operate at a hoop stress less than 30 the segment being tested.
percent of SMYS and at or above 100 (b) Each main that is to be operated at less
p.s.i. (689 kPa) gage. than 1 p.s.i. (6.9 kPa) gage must be tested to
at least 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage and each main
Except for service lines and plastic pipe- to be operated at or above 1 p.s.i. (6.9 kPa)
lines, each segment of a pipeline that is to be gage must be tested to at least 90 p.s.i. (621
operated at a hoop stress less than 30 percent kPa) gage.
of SMYS and at or above 100 p.s.i. (689
kPa) gage must be tested in accordance with [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
the following: by Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21,
(a) The pipeline operator must use a test 1988; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
procedure that will ensure discovery of all po- 1998]
69
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.511 Test requirements for service be more than three times the pressure deter-
lines. mined under §192.121, at a temperature not
less than the pipe temperature during the test.
(a) Each segment of a service line (other (d) During the test, the temperature of
than plastic) must be leak tested in accordance thermoplastic material may not be more than
with this section before being placed in service. 100°F (38°C), or the temperature at which the
If feasible, the service line connection to the material's long-term hydrostatic strength has
main must be included in the test; if not feasi- been determined under the listed specification,
ble, it must be given a leakage test at the oper- whichever is greater.
ating pressure when placed in service.
(b) Each segment of a service line (other [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
than plastic) intended to be operated at a pres- by Amdt. 192-77, 61 FR 27789, June 3,
sure of at least 1 p.s.i. (6.9 kPa) gage but not 1996; Amdt. 192-77A, 61 FR 45905, Aug.
more than 40 p.s.i. (276 kPa) gage must be 30, 1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July
given a leak test at a pressure of not less than 13, 1998 ]
50 p.s.i. (345 kPa) gage.
(c) Each segment of a service line (other
than plastic) intended to be operated at pres- §192.515 Environmental protection and
sures of more than 40 p.s.i. (276 kPa) gage safety requirements.
must be tested to at least 90 p.s.i. (621 kPa)
gage, except that each segment of the steel (a) In conducting tests under this subpart,
service line stressed to 20 percent or more of each operator shall insure that every reason-
SMYS must be tested in accordance with able precaution is taken to protect its employ-
§192.507 of this subpart. ees and the general public during the testing.
Whenever the hoop stress of the segment of
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended the pipeline being tested will exceed 50 percent
by Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, of SMYS, the operator shall take all practica-
1996; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, ble steps to keep persons not working on the
1998] testing operation outside of the testing area until
the pressure is reduced to or below the pro-
posed maximum allowable operating pressure.
§192.513 Test requirements for plastic (b) The operator shall insure that the test
pipelines. medium is disposed of in a manner that will
minimize damage to the environment.
(a) Each segment of a plastic pipeline must
be tested in accordance with this section. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
(b) The test procedure must insure discov-
ery of all potentially hazardous leaks in the seg-
ment being tested. §192.517 Records.
(c) The test pressure must be at least 150
percent of the maximum operating pressure or (a) Each operator shall make, and retain
50 p.s.i. (345 kPa) gage, whichever is greater. for the useful life of the pipeline, a record of
However, the maximum test pressure may not each test performed under §§ 192.505 and
70
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
192.507. The record must contain at least the
following information:
(1) The operator's name, the name of the
operator's employee responsible for making
the test, and the name of any test company
used.
(2) Test medium used.
(3) Test pressure.
(4) Test duration.
(5) Pressure recording charts, or other re-
cord of pressure readings.
(6) Elevation variations, whenever signifi-
cant for the particular test.
(7) Leaks and failures noted and their dis-
position.
(b) Each operator must maintain a record
of each test required by §§ 192.509, 192.511,
and 192.513 for at least 5 years.
71
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart K–Uprating vided in §192.555(c), a new maximum allow-
able operating pressure established under this
subpart may not exceed the maximum that
§192.551 Scope. would be allowed under §§ 192.619 and
192.621for a new segment of pipeline con-
This subpart prescribes minimum require- structed of the same materials in the same loca-
ments for increasing maximum allowable oper- tion. However, when uprating a steel pipeline,
ating pressures (uprating) for pipelines. if any variable necessary to determine the de-
sign pressure under the design formula
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (§192.105) is unknown, the MAOP may be
increased as provided in §192.619(a)(1).
§192.553 General requirements. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
(a) Pressure increases. Whenever the re- 1996; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
quirements of this subpart require that an in- 2003]
crease in operating pressure be made in incre-
ments, the pressure must be increased gradu-
ally, at a rate that can be controlled, and in ac- §192.555 Uprating to a pressure that will
cordance with the following: produce a hoop stress of 30 pe rcent or
(1) At the end of each incremental in- more of SMYS in steel pipelines.
crease, the pressure must be held constant
while the entire segment of the pipeline that is (a) Unless the requirements of this section
affected is checked for leaks. have been met, no person may subject any
(2) Each leak detected must be repaired segment of a steel pipeline to an operating
before a further pressure increase is made, ex- pressure that will produce a hoop stress of 30
cept that a leak determined not to be poten- percent or more of SMYS and that is above
tially hazardous need not be repaired, if it is the established maximum allowable operating
monitored during the pressure increase and it pressure.
does not become potentially hazardous. (b) Before increasing operating pressure
(b) Records. Each operator who uprates a above the previously established maximum al-
segment of pipeline shall retain for the life of the lowable operating pressure the operator shall:
segment a record of each investigation required (1) Review the design, operating, and
by this subpart, of all work performed, and of maintenance history and previous testing of the
each pressure test conducted, in connection segment of pipeline and determine whether the
with the uprating. proposed increase is safe and consistent with
(c) Written plan. Each operator who the requirements of this part; and
uprates a segment of pipeline shall establish a (2) Make any repairs, replacements, or
written procedure that will ensure that each alterations in the segment of pipeline that are
applicable requirement of this subpart is com- necessary for safe operation at the increased
plied with. pressure.
(d) Limitation on increase in maximum al- (c) After complying with paragraph (b) of
lowable operating pressure. Except as pro- this section, an operator may increase the
72
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
maximum allowable operating pressure of a §192.557 Uprating: Steel pipelines to a
segment of pipeline constructed before Sep- pressure that will produce a hoop stress
tember 12, 1970, to the highest pressure that is less than 30 pe rcent of SMYS: plastic,
permitted under §192.619, using as test pres- cast iron, and ductile iron pipelines.
sure the highest pressure to which the segment
of pipeline was previously subjected (either in a (a) Unless the requirements of this section
strength test or in actual operation). have been met, no person may subject:
(d) After complying with paragraph (b) of (1) A segment of steel pipeline to an oper-
this section, an operator that does not qualify ating pressure that will produce a hoop stress
under paragraph (c) of this section may in- less than 30 percent of SMYS and that is
crease the previously established maximum above the previously established maximum al-
allowable operating pressure if at least one of lowable operating pressure; or
the following requirements is met: (2) A plastic, cast iron, or ductile iron
(1) The segment of pipeline is successfully pipeline segment to an operating pressure that
tested in accordance with the requirements of is above the previously established maximum
this part for a new line of the same material in allowable operating pressure.
the same location. (b) Before increasing operating pressure
(2) An increased maximum allowable op- above the previously established maximum al-
erating pressure may be established for a seg- lowable operating pressure, the operator shall:
ment of pipeline in a Class 1 location if the line (1) Review the design, operating, and
has not previously been tested, and if: maintenance history of the segment of pipeline;
(i) It is impractical to test it in accordance (2) Make a leakage survey (if it has been
with the requirements of this part; more than 1 year since the last survey) and re-
(ii) The new maximum operating pressure pair any leaks that are found, except that a leak
does not exceed 80 percent of that allowed for determined not to be potentially hazardous
a new line of the same design in the same loca- need not be repaired, if it is monitored during
tion; and, the pressure increase and it does not become
(iii) The operator determines that the new potentially hazardous;
maximum allowable operating pressure is con- (3) Make any repairs, replacements, or
sistent with the condition of the segment of alterations in the segment of pipeline that are
pipeline and the design requirements of this necessary for safe operation at the increased
part. pressure;
(e) Where a segment of pipeline is uprated (4) Reinforce or anchor offsets, bends and
in accordance with paragraph (c) or (d)(2) of dead ends in pipe joined by compression cou-
this section, the increase in pressure must be plings or bell and spigot joints to prevent failure
made in increments that are equal to: of the pipe joint, if the offset, bend, or dead
(1) 10 percent of the pressure before the end is exposed in an excavation;
uprating; or (5) Isolate the segment of pipeline in which
(2) 25 percent of the total pressure in- the pressure is to be increased from any adja-
crease, whichever produces the fewer number cent segment that will continue to be operated
of increments. at a lower pressure; and,
(6) If the pressure in mains or service lines,
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] or both, is to be higher than the pressure deliv-
73
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
ered to the customer, install a service regulator taken must be increased by the allowance indi-
on each service line and test each regulator to cated in the following table:
determine that it is functioning. Pressure may
be increased as necessary to test each regula- Allowance (inches) (millimeters)
tor, after a regulator has been installed on each Pipe size Cast iron pipe Ductile
(inches) Pit cast Centri- iron pipe
pipeline subject to the increased pressure. (millimeters) pipe fugally
(c) After complying with paragraph (b) of cast
this section, the increase in maximum allowable pipe
operating pressure must be made in increments 3 to 8 0.075 0.065 0.065
(76 to 203) (1.91)
that are equal to 10 p.s.i. (69 kPa) gage or 25
10 to 12 0.080 0.070 0.070
percent of the total pressure increase, which- (254 to 305) (2.03)
ever produces the fewer number of increments. 14 to 24 0.080 0.080 0.075
Whenever the requirements of paragraph (356 to 610) (2.03) (2.03) (1.91)
(b)(6) of this section apply, there must be at 30 to 42 0.090 0.090 0.075
(762 to (2.29) (2.29) (1.91)
least two approximately equal incremental in- 1067)
creases. 48 (1219) 0.090 0.090 0.080
(d) If records for cast iron or ductile iron (2.29) (2.29)
pipeline facilities are not complete enough to 54 to 60 0.090
determine stresses produced by internal pres- (1372 to (2.29)
1524)
sure, trench loading, rolling loads, beam
stresses, and other bending loads, in evaluating
(4) For cast iron pipe, unless the pipe
the level of safety of the pipeline when operat-
manufacturing process is known, the operator
ing at the proposed increased pressure, the
shall assume that the pipe is pit cast pipe with a
following procedures must be followed:
bursting tensile strength of 11,000 p.s.i. (76
(1) In estimating the stress, if the original
MPa) gage and a modulus of rupture of
laying conditions cannot be ascertained, the
31,000 p.s.i. (214 MPa) gage.
operator shall assume that cast iron pipe was
supported on blocks with tamped backfill and
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
that ductile iron pipe was laid without blocks
by Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2,
with tamped backfill.
1981; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6,
(2) Unless the actual maximum cover depth
1989; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
is known, the operator shall measure the actual
1998]
cover in at least three places where the cover is
most likely to be greatest and shall use the
greatest cover measured.
(3) Unless the actual nominal wall thickness
is known, the operator shall determine the wall
thickness by cutting and measuring coupons
from at least three separate pipe lengths. The
coupons must be cut from pipe lengths in areas
where the cover depth is most likely to be the
greatest. The average of all measurements
74
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart L–Operations maintenance activities and for emergency re-
sponse. For transmission lines, the manual
§192.601 Scope. must also include procedures for handling ab-
normal operations. This manual must be re-
This subpart prescribes minimum require- viewed and updated by the operator at inter-
ments for the operation of pipeline facilities. vals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once
each calendar year. This manual must be pre-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] pared before operations of a pipeline system
commence. Appropriate parts of the manual
must be kept at locations where operations and
§192.603 General provisions . maintenance activities are conducted.
(b) Maintenance and normal operations.
(a) No person may operate a segment of The manual required by paragraph (a) of this
pipeline unless it is operated in accordance section must include procedures for the follow-
with this subpart. ing, if applicable, to provide safety during
(b) Each operator shall keep records nec- maintenance and operations.
essary to administer the procedures established (1) Operating, maintaining, and repairing
under §192.605. the pipeline in accordance with each of the re-
(c) The Administrator or the State Agency quirements of this subpart and Subpart M of
that has submitted a current certification under this part.
the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101, et (2) Controlling corrosion in accordance
seq.) with respect to the pipeline facility gov- with the operations and maintenance require-
erned by an operator's plans and procedures ments of Subpart I of this part.
may, after notice and opportunity for hearing as (3) Making construction records, maps,
provided in 49 CFR 190.237 or the relevant and operating history available to appropriate
State procedures, require the operator to operating personnel.
amend its plans and procedures as necessary (4) Gathering of data needed for reporting
to provide a reasonable level of safety. incidents under Part 191 of this chapter in a
timely and effective manner.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 9, 1970, as amended (5) Starting up and shutting down any part
by 192-66, 56 FR 31087, July 9, 1991; of the pipeline in a manner designed to assure
Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11, 1994; operation within the MAOP limits prescribed
Amdt. 192-75, 61 FR 18512, Apr. 26, 1996] by this part, plus the build-up allowed for op-
eration of pressure-limiting and control devices.
(6) Maintaining compressor stations, in-
§192.605 Procedural manual for opera- cluding provisions for isolating units or sections
tions, maintenance, and emergencies of pipe and for purging before returning to ser-
vice.
Each operator shall include the following in (7) Starting, operating and shutting down
its operating and maintenance plan: gas compressor units.
(a) General. Each operator shall prepare (8) Periodically reviewing the work done
and follow for each pipeline, a manual of writ- by operator personnel to determine the effec-
ten procedures for conducting operations and tiveness and adequacy of the procedures used
75
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
in normal operation and maintenance and (iv) Operation of any safety device; and,
modifying the procedure when deficiencies are (v) Any other foreseeable malfunction of a
found. component, deviation from normal operation,
(9) Taking adequate precautions in exca- or personnel error which may result in a hazard
vated trenches to protect personnel from the to persons or property.
hazards of unsafe accumulations of vapor or (2) Checking variations from normal op-
gas, and making available when needed at the eration after abnormal operation has ended at
excavation, emergency rescue equipment, in- sufficient critical locations in the system to de-
cluding a breathing apparatus and, a rescue termine continued integrity and safe operation.
harness and line. (3) Notifying responsible operator person-
(10) Systematic and routine testing and nel when notice of an abnormal operation is
inspection of pipe-type or bottle-type holders received.
including – (4) Periodically reviewing the response of
(i) Provision for detecting external corro- operator personnel to determine the effective-
sion before the strength of the container has ness of the procedures controlling abnormal
been impaired; operation and taking corrective action where
(ii) Periodic sampling and testing of gas in deficiencies are found.
storage to determine the dew point of vapors (5) The requirements of this paragraph (c)
contained in the stored gas which, if con- do not apply to natural gas distribution opera-
densed, might cause internal corrosion or inter- tors that are operating transmission lines in
fere with the safe operation of the storage connection with their distribution system.
plant; and, (d) Safety-related condition reports. The
(iii) Periodic inspection and testing of pres- manual required by paragraph (a) of this sec-
sure limiting equipment to determine that it is in tion must include instructions enabling person-
safe operating condition and has adequate ca- nel who perform operation and maintenance
pacity. activities to recognize conditions that potentially
(11) Responding promptly to a report of a may be safety-related conditions that are sub-
gas odor inside or near a building, unless the ject to the reporting requirements of §191.23
operator's emergency procedures under of this subchapter.
§192.615(a)(3) specifically apply to these re- (e) Surveillance, emergency response, and
ports. accident investigation. The procedures re-
(c) Abnormal operation. For transmission quired by §§ 192.613(a), 192.615, and
lines, the manual required by paragraph (a) of 192.617 must be included in the manual re-
this section must include procedures for the quired by paragraph (a) of this section
following to provide safety when operating de-
sign limits have been exceeded: [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
(1) Responding to, investigating, and cor- by Amdt. 192-59, 53 FR 24942, July 1,1988;
recting the cause of: Amdt. 192-59C, 53 FR 26560, July 13,
(i) Unintended closure of valves or shut- 1988; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6579, Feb. 11,
downs; 1994; Amdt. 192-71A, 60 FR 14381, Mar.
(ii) Increase or decrease in pressure or 17, 1995; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept.
flow rate outside normal operating limits; 15, 2003]
(iii) Loss of communications;
76
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.607 [Removed and Reserved] §192.611 Change in class location: Con-
firmation or revision of maximum allow-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 10, 1970, as amended able operating pre ssure.
by Amdt. 192-5, 36 FR 18194, Sept. 10,
1971; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, (a) If the hoop stress corresponding to the
1996] established maximum allowable operating pres-
sure of a segment of pipeline is not commensu-
rate with the present class location, and the
§192.609 Change in class location: Re- segment is in satisfactory physical condition,
quired study. the maximum allowable operating pressure of
that segment of pipeline must be confirmed or
Whenever an increase in population density revised according to one of the following re-
indicates a change in class location for a seg- quirements:
ment of an existing steel pipeline operating at a (1) If the segment involved has been previ-
hoop stress that is more than 40 percent of ously tested in place for a period of not less
SMYS, or indicates that the hoop stress corre- than 8 hours, the maximum allowable operating
sponding to the established maximum allowable pressure is 0.8 times the test pressure in Class
operating pressure for a segment of existing 2 locations, 0.667 times the test pressure in
pipeline is not commensurate with the present Class 3 locations, or 0.555 times the test pres-
class location, the operator shall immediately sure in Class 4 locations. The corresponding
make a study to determine; hoop stress may not exceed 72 percent of the
(a) The present class location for the seg- SMYS of the pipe in Class 2 locations, 60
ment involved. percent of SMYS in Class 3 locations, or 50
(b) The design, construction, and testing percent of SMYS in Class 4 locations.
procedures followed in the original construc- (2) The maximum allowable operating
tion, and a comparison of these procedures pressure of the segment involved must be re-
with those required for the present class loca- duced so that the corresponding hoop stress is
tion by the applicable provisions of this part. not more than that allowed by this part for new
(c) The physical condition of the segment segments of pipelines in the existing class loca-
to the extent it can be ascertained from avail- tion.
able records; (3) The segment involved must be tested in
(d) The operating and maintenance history accordance with the applicable requirements of
of the segment; Subpart J of this part, and its maximum allow-
(e) The maximum actual operating pressure able operating pressure must then be estab-
and the corresponding operating hoop stress, lished according to the following criteria:
taking pressure gradient into account, for the (i) The maximum allowable operating pres-
segment of pipeline involved; and, sure after the requalification test is 0.8 times the
(f) The actual area affected by the popula- test pressure for Class 2 locations, 0.667 times
tion density increase, and physical barriers or the test pressure for Class 3 locations, and
other factors which may limit further expansion 0.555 times the test pressure for Class 4 loca-
of the more densely populated area. tions.
(ii) The corresponding hoop stress may not
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] exceed 72 percent of the SMYS of the pipe in
77
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Class 2 locations, 60 percent of SMYS in The procedures must be in effect August 10,
Class 3 locations, or 50 percent of SMYS in 2005.
Class 4 locations. (b) Each operator shall conduct appropriate
(b) The maximum allowable operating periodic underwater inspections of its pipelines
pressure confirmed or revised in accordance in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets in waters less
with this section, may not exceed the maximum than 15 feet (4.6 meters) deep as measured
allowable operating pressure established be- from mean low water based on the identified
fore the confirmation or revision. risk.
(c) Confirmation or revision of the maxi- (c) If an operator discovers that its pipeline
mum allowable operating pressure of a seg- is an exposed underwater pipeline or poses a
ment of pipeline in accordance with this section hazard to navigation, the operator shall—
does not preclude the application of (1) Promptly, but not later than 24 hours
§§ 192.553 and 192.555. after discovery, notify the National Response
(d) Confirmation or revision of the maxi- Center, telephone: 1-800-424-8802, of the
mum allowable operating pressure that is re- location and, if available, the geographic coor-
quired as a result of a study under §192.609 dinates of that pipeline.
must be completed within 24 months of the (2) Promptly, but not later than 7 days after
change in class location. Pressure reduction discovery, mark the location of the pipeline in
under paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section accordance with 33 CFR part 64 at the ends of
within the 24-month period does not preclude the pipeline segment and at intervals of not over
establishing a maximum allowable operating 500 yards (457 meters) long, except that a
pressure under paragraph (a)(3) of this section pipeline segment less than 200 yards (183 me-
at a later date. ters) long need only be marked at the center;
and
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended (3) Within 6 months after discovery, or not
by Amdt. 192-5, 36 FR 18195, Sept. 10, later than November 1 of the following year if
1971; Amdt. 192-53, 51 FR 34987, Oct. 1, the 6 month period is later than November 1 of
1986; Amdt. 192-63, 54 FR 24173, June 6, the year of discovery, bury the pipeline so that
1989; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, the top of the pipe is 36 inches (914 millime-
1996; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, ters) below the underwater natural bottom (as
2004] determined by recognized and generally ac-
cepted practices) for normal excavation or 18
inches (457 millimeters) for rock excavation.
§192.612 Underwater inspection and re- (i) An operator may employ engineered
burial of pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico alternatives to burial that meet or exceed the
and its inlets. level of protection provided by burial.
(ii) If an operator cannot obtain required
(a) Each operator shall prepare and follow state or Federal permits in time to comply with
a procedure to identify its pipelines in the Gulf this section, it must notify OPS; specify
of Mexico and its inlets in waters less than 15 whether the required permit is State or Fed-
feet (4.6 meters) deep as measured from mean eral; and, justify the delay.
low water that are at risk of being an exposed
underwater pipeline or a hazard to navigation.
78
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Amdt. 192-67, 56 FR 63764, Dec. 5, 1991 program, such as a one-call system, but such
as amended by Amdt 192-85, 63 FR 37500, participation does not relieve the operator of
July 13, 1998; Amdt. 192-98, 69 FR 48400, responsibility for compliance with this section.
Aug. 10, 2004] However, an operator must perform the duties
of paragraph (c)(3) of this section through par-
ticipation in a one-call system, if that one-call
§192.613 Continuing Surveillance. system is a qualified one-call system. In areas
that are covered by more than one qualified
(a) Each operator shall have a procedure one-call system, an operator need only join
for continuing surveillance of its facilities to de- one of the qualified one-call systems if there is
termine and take appropriate action concerning a central telephone number for excavators to
changes in class location, failures, leakage his- call for excavation activities, or if the one-call
tory, corrosion, substantial changes in cathodic systems in those areas communicate with one
protection requirements, and other unusual op- another. An operator’s pipeline system must
erating and maintenance conditions. be covered by a qualified one-call system
(b) If a segment of pipeline is determined where there is one in place. For the purpose
to be in unsatisfactory condition but no imme- of this section, a one-call system is considered
diate hazard exists, the operator shall initiate a a “qualified one-call system” if it meets the re-
program to recondition or phase out the seg- quirements of section (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this
ment involved, or, if the segment cannot be section.
reconditioned or phased out, reduce the maxi- (1) The state has adopted a one-call dam-
mum allowable operating pressure in accor- age prevention program under §198.37 of this
dance with §192.619(a) and (b). chapter, or
(2) The one-call system:
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (i) Is operated in accordance with §198.39
of this chapter;
(ii) Provides a pipeline operator an oppor-
§192.614 Damage prevention program. tunity similar to a voluntary participant to have
a part in management responsibilities; and
(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (d) (iii) Assesses a participating pipeline op-
and (e) of this section, each operator of a bur- erator a fee that is proportionate to the costs of
ied pipeline shall carry out, in accordance with the one-call system’s coverage of the opera-
this section, a written program to prevent dam- tor’s pipeline.
age to that pipeline from excavation activities. (c) The damage prevention program re-
For the purpose of this section, the term "exca- quired by paragraph (a) of this section must, at
vation activities" includes excavation, blasting, a minimum:
boring, tunneling, backfilling, the removal of (1) Include the identity, on a current basis,
above ground structures by either explosive or of persons who normally engage in excavation
mechanical means, and other earth moving op- activities in the area in which the pipeline is lo-
erations. cated.
(b) An operator may comply with any of (2) Provides for notification of the public in
the requirements of paragraph (c) of this sec- the vicinity of the pipeline and actual notifica-
tion through participation in a public service tion of the persons identified in paragraph
79
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(c)(1) of this section of the following as often (1) The requirement of paragraph (a) of
as needed to make them aware of the damage this section that the damage prevention pro-
prevention program: gram be written; and
(i) The program's existence and purpose; (2) The requirements of paragraphs (c)(1)
and and (c)(2) of this section.
(ii) How to learn the location of under-
ground pipelines before excavation activities [Amdt. 192-40, 47 FR 13818, Apr. 1, 1982;
are begun. Amdt. 192-57, 52 FR 32798, Aug. 31, 1987;
(3) Provide a means of receiving and re- Amdt. 192-73, 60 FR 14646, Mar. 20, 1995;
cording notification of planned excavation ac- Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, 1996;
tivities. Amdt. 192-82, 62 FR 61695, Nov. 19, 1997;
(4) If the operator has buried pipelines in Amdt. 192-84, 63 FR 7721, Feb. 17, 1998;
the area of excavation activity, provide for ac- Amdt. 192-84A, 63 FR 38757, July 20,
tual notification of persons who give notice of 1998]
their intent to excavate of the type of tempo-
rary marking to be provided and how to iden-
tify the markings. §192.615 Emergency plans.
(5) Provide for temporary marking of bur-
ied pipelines in the area of excavation activity (a) Each operator shall establish written
before, as far as practical, the activity begins. procedures to minimize the hazard resulting
(6) Provide as follows for inspection of from a gas pipeline emergency. At a minimum,
pipelines that an operator has reason to believe the procedures must provide for the following:
could be damaged by excavation activities: (1) Receiving, identifying, and classifying
(i) The inspection must be done as fre- notices of events which require immediate re-
quently as necessary during and after the activi- sponse by the operator.
ties to verify the integrity of the pipeline; and (2) Establishing and maintaining adequate
(ii) In the case of blasting, any inspection means of communication with appropriate fire,
must include leakage surveys. police, and other public officials.
(d) A damage prevention program under (3) Prompt and effective response to a no-
this section is not required for the following tice of each type of emergency, including the
pipelines: following:
(1) Pipelines located offshore. (i) Gas detected inside or near a building.
(2) Pipelines, other than those located off- (ii) Fire located near or directly involving a
shore, in Class 1 or 2 locations until September pipeline facility.
20, 1995. (iii) Explosion occurring near or directly
(3) Pipelines to which access is physically involving a pipeline facility.
controlled by the operator. (iv) Natural disaster.
(e) Pipelines operated by persons other (4) The availability of personnel, equip-
than municipalities (including operators of mas- ment, tools, and materials, as needed at the
ter meters) whose primary activity does not scene of an emergency.
include the transportation of gas need not (5) Actions directed toward protecting
comply with the following: people first and then property.
80
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(6) Emergency shutdown and pressure re- (4) Plan how the operator and officials can
duction in any section of the operator's pipeline engage in mutual assistance to minimize hazards
system necessary to minimize hazards to life or to life or property.
property.
(7) Making safe any actual or potential [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
hazard to life or property. by Amdt. 192-24, 41 FR 13586, Mar. 31,
(8) Notifying appropriate fire, police, and 1976; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6585, Feb. 11,
other public officials of gas pipeline emergen- 1994]
cies and coordinating with them both planned
responses and actual responses during an
emergency. §192.616 Public education
(9) Safely restoring any service outage.
(10) Beginning action under §192.617, if Each operator shall establish a continuing
applicable, as soon after the end of the emer- educational program to enable customers, the
gency as possible. public, appropriate government organizations,
(b) Each operator shall: and persons engaged in excavation related ac-
(1) Furnish its supervisors who are respon- tivities to recognize a gas pipeline emergency
sible for emergency action a copy of that por- for the purpose of reporting it to the operator
tion of the latest edition of the emergency pro- or the appropriate public officials. The pro-
cedures established under paragraph (a) of this gram and the media used must be as compre-
section as necessary for compliance with those hensive as necessary to reach all areas in which
procedures. the operator transports gas. The program must
(2) Train the appropriate operating per- be conducted in English and in other languages
sonnel to assure that they are knowledgeable commonly understood by a significant number
of the emergency procedures and verify that and concentration of the non-English speaking
the training is effective. population in the operator's area.
(3) Review employee activities to deter-
mine whether the procedures were effectively [Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11, 1994]
followed in each emergency.
(c) Each operator shall establish and main-
tain liaison with appropriate fire, police, and §192.617 Investigation of failures.
other public officials to:
(1) Learn the responsibility and resources Each operator shall establish procedures
of each government organization that may re- for analyzing accidents and failures, including
spond to a gas pipeline emergency; the selection of samples of the failed facility or
(2) Acquaint the officials with the opera- equipment for laboratory examination, where
tor's ability in responding to a gas pipeline appropriate, for the purpose of determining the
emergency; causes of the failure and minimizing the possi-
(3) Identify the types of gas pipeline emer- bility of a recurrence.
gencies of which the operator notifies the offi-
cials; and,
§192.619 Maximum allowable operating
pressure: Steel or plastic pipelines.
81
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
offshore platform, the factor is 1.25. For segments
installed, uprated or converted after July 31, 1977,
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of
that are located on an offshore platform or on a plat-
this section, no person may operate a segment form in inland navigable waters, including a pipe
of steel or plastic pipeline at a pressure that riser, the factor is 1.5.
exceeds the lowest of the following:
(1) The design pressure of the weakest (3) The highest actual operating pressure to
element in the segment, determined in accor- which the segment was subjected during the 5
dance with Subparts C and D of this part. years preceding July 1, 1970 (or in the case of
However, for steel pipe in pipelines being con- offshore gathering lines, July 1, 1976), unless
verted under §192.14 or uprated under sub- the segment was tested in accordance with
part K of this part, if any variable necessary to paragraph (a)(2) of this section after July 1,
determine the design pressure under the design 1965 (or in the case of offshore gathering lines,
formula (§192.105) is unknown, one of the July 1, 1971), or the segment was uprated in
following pressures is to be used as design accordance with Subpart K of this part.
pressure: (4) The pressure determined by the opera-
(i) Eighty percent of the first test pressure tor to be the maximum safe pressure after con-
that produces yield under section N5.0 of Ap- sidering the history of the segment, particularly
pendix N of ASME B31.8, reduced by the known corrosion and the actual operating
appropriate factor in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this pressure.
section; or (b) No person may operate a segment to
(ii) If the pipe is 12¾ inches (324 mm) or which paragraph (a)(4) of this section is appli-
less in outside diameter and is not tested to cable, unless overpressure protective devices
yield under this paragraph, 200 p.s.i. (1379 are installed on the segment in a manner that
kPa) gage. will prevent the maximum allowable operating
(2) The pressure obtained by dividing the pressure from being exceeded, in accordance
pressure to which the segment was tested after with §192.195.
construction as follows: (c) Notwithstanding the other requirements
(i) For plastic pipe in all locations, the test of this section, an operator may operate a
pressure is divided by a factor of 1.5. segment of pipeline found to be in satisfactory
(ii) For steel pipe operated at 100 p.s.i. condition, considering its operating and mainte-
(689 kPa) gage or more, the test pressure is nance history, at the highest actual operating
divided by a factor determined in accordance pressure to which the segment was subjected
with the following table: during the 5 years preceding July 1, 1970, or in
the case of offshore gathering lines, July 1,
1
Factors , segment 1976, subject to the requirements of
Class Installed Installed Covered un- §192.611.
loca- before after der §192.14
tion Nov. 12, Nov. 11,
1970 1970 [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
1 1.1 1.1 1.25 by Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17559, Nov. 17,
2 1.25 1.25 1.25 1970; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16,
3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1976; Amdt. 192-27A, 41 FR 47252, Oct.
4 1.4 1.5 1.5
1 28, 1976; Amdt. 192-30, 42 FR 60146, Nov.
For offshore segments installed, uprated or con-
verted after July 31, 1977, that are not located on an 25, 1977; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June
82
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
6, 1996; Amdt 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
13, 1998] by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998]
83
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) The line transports gas to any of the Operators of master meter systems may com-
following facilities which received gas without ply with this requirement by–
an odorant from that line before May 5, 1975: (1) Receiving written verification from their
(i) An underground storage field; gas source that the gas has the proper concen-
(ii) A gas processing plant; tration of odorant; and
(iii) A gas dehydration plant; or (2) Conducting periodic "sniff" tests at the
(iv) An industrial plant using gas in a proc- extremities of the system to confirm that the gas
ess where the presence of an odorant: contains odorant.
(A) Makes the end product unfit for the
purpose for which it is intended; [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
(B) Reduces the activity of a catalyst; or by Amdt. 192-2, 35 FR 17335, Nov. 11,
(C) Reduces the percentage completion of 1970; Amdt. 192-6, 36 FR 25423, Dec. 31,
a chemical reaction; 1971; Amdt. 192-7, 37 FR 17970, Sept. 2,
(3) In the case of a lateral line which trans- 1972; Amdt. 192-14, 38 FR 14943, June 7,
ports gas to a distribution center, at least 50 1973; Amdt. 192-15, 38 FR 35471, Dec. 28,
percent of the length of that line is in a Class 1 1973; Amdt. 192-16, 39 FR 45253, Dec. 31,
or Class 2 location; or, 1974; Amdt. 192-21, 40 FR 20279, May 9,
(4) The combustible gas is hydrogen in- 1975; Amdt. 192-58, 53 FR 1633, Jan. 21,
tended for use as a feedstock in a manufactur- 1988; Amdt. 192-76, 61 FR 26121, May 24,
ing process. 1996; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
(c) In the concentrations in which it is used, 1996; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
the odorant in combustible gases must comply 2003]
with the following:
(1) The odorant may not be deleterious to
persons, materials, or pipe. §192.627 Tapping pipelines under pre s-
(2) The products of combustion from the sure.
odorant may not be toxic when breathed nor
may they be corrosive or harmful to those ma- Each tap made on a pipeline under pres-
terials to which the products of combustion will sure must be performed by a crew qualified to
be exposed. make hot taps.
(d) The odorant may not be soluble in wa-
ter to an extent greater than 2.5 parts to 100 [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
parts by weight.
(e) Equipment for odorization must intro-
duce the odorant without wide variations in the §192.629 Purging of pipelines.
level of odorant.
(f) To assure the proper concentration of (a) When a pipeline is being purged of air
odorant in accordance with this section, each by use of gas, the gas must be released into
operator must conduct periodic sampling of one end of the line in a moderately rapid and
combustible gases using an instrument capable continuous flow. If gas cannot be supplied in
of determining the percentage of gas in air at sufficient quantity to prevent the formation of a
which the odor becomes readily detectable. hazardous mixture of gas and air, a slug of inert
84
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
gas must be released into the line before the
gas.
(b) When a pipeline is being purged of gas
by use of air, the air must be released into one
end of the line in a moderately rapid and con-
tinuous flow. If air cannot be supplied in suffi-
cient quantity to prevent the formation of a
hazardous mixture of gas and air, a slug of inert
gas must be released into the line before the
air.
85
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart M–Maintenance 1, 2 7½ months; but 15 months; but
at least twice at least once
each calendar each calendar
year. year.
§192.701 Scope. 3 4½ months; but 7½ months; but
at least four at least twice
This subpart prescribes minimum require- times each cal- each calendar
endar year. year.
ments for maintenance of pipeline facilities. 4 4½ months; but 4½ months; but
at least four at least four
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] times each cal- times each cal-
endar year. endar year.
(c) Methods of patrolling include walking,
§192.703 General. driving, flying or other appropriate means of
traversing the right-of-way.
(a) No person may operate a segment of
pipeline, unless it is maintained in accordance [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
with this subpart. by Amdt. 192-21, 40 FR 20283, May 9,
(b) Each segment of pipeline that becomes 1975; Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21,
unsafe must be replaced, repaired, or removed 1982; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
from service. 1996]
(c) Hazardous leaks must be repaired
promptly.
§192.706 Transmission lines: Leakage
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] surveys.
Class Maximum interval between patrols [Amdt. 192-21, 40 FR 20283, May 9, 1975,
location At highway and At all other as amended by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850,
of line railroad cross- places Oct. 21, 1982; Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575,
ings
Feb. 11, 1994]
86
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.707 Line markers for mains and (2) The name of the operator and tele-
transmission lines. phone number (including area code) where the
operator can be reached at all times.
(a) Buried pipelines. Except as provided in
paragraph (b) of this section, a line marker [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
must be placed and maintained as close as by Amdt. 192-20A, 41 FR 56808, Dec. 30,
practical over each buried main and transmis- 1976; Amdt. 192-20, 40 FR 13505, Mar. 27,
sion line: 1975; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 39752, Sept. 16,
(1) At each crossing of a public road and 1976; Amdt. 192-40, 47 FR 13818, Apr. 1,
railroad; and 1982; Amdt. 192-44, 48 FR 25206, June 6,
(2) Wherever necessary to identify the lo- 1983; Amdt. 192-73, 60 FR 14646, Mar. 20,
cation of the transmission line or main to re- 1995; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
duce the possibility of damage or interference. 1998]
(b) Exceptions for buried pipelines. Line
markers are not required for the following
pipelines: §192.709 Transmission lines: Record-
(1) Mains and transmission lines located keeping.
offshore, or at crossings of or under waterways
and other bodies of water. Each operator shall maintain the following
(2) Mains in Class 3 or Class 4 locations records for transmission lines for the periods
where a damage prevention program is in ef- specified:
fect under §192.614. (a) The date, location, and description of
(3) Transmission lines in Class 3 or 4 loca- each repair made to pipe (including pipe-to-
tions until March 20, 1996. pipe connections) must be retained for as long
(4) Transmission lines in Class 3 or 4 loca- as the pipe remains in service.
tions where placement of a line marker is im- (b) The date, location, and description of
practical. each repair made to parts of the pipeline sys-
(c) Pipelines above ground. Line markers tem other than pipe must be retained for at
must be placed and maintained along each sec- least 5 years. However, repairs generated by
tion of a main and transmission line that is lo- patrols, surveys, inspections, or tests required
cated above ground in an area accessible to by subparts L and M of this part must be re-
the public. tained in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
(d) Marker warning. The following must section.
be written legibly on a background of sharply (c) A record of each patrol, survey, in-
contrasting color on each line marker: spection, and test required by subparts L and
(1) The word "Warning," "Caution," or M of this part must be retained for at least 5
"Danger" followed by the words "Gas (or name years or until the next patrol, survey, inspec-
of gas transported) Pipeline" all of which, ex- tion, or test is completed, whichever is longer.
cept for markers in heavily developed urban
areas, must be in letters at least 1 inch (25 mil- [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
limeters) high with ¼ inch (6.4 millimeters) by Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
stroke. 1996]
87
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.711 Transmission lines: General §192.715 Transmission lines: Pe rmanent
requirements for repair procedures. field repair of welds.
(a) Each operator shall take immediate Each weld that is unacceptable under
temporary measures to protect the public §192.241(c) must be repaired as follows:
whenever: (a) If it is feasible to take the segment of
(1) A leak, imperfection, or damage that transmission line out of service, the weld must
impairs its serviceability is found in a segment be repaired in accordance with the applicable
of steel transmission line operating at or above requirements of §192.245.
40 percent of the SMYS; and (b) A weld may be repaired in accordance
(2) It is not feasible to make a permanent with §192.245 while the segment of transmis-
repair at the time of discovery. sion line is in service if:
As soon as feasible the operator shall (1) The weld is not leaking:
make permanent repairs. (2) The pressure in the segment is reduced
(b) Except as provided in §192.717(b)(3), so that it does not produce a stress that is more
no operator may use a welded patch as a than 20 percent of the SMYS of the pipe; and
means of repair. (3) Grinding of the defective area can be
limited so that at least 1/8-inch (3.2 millimeters)
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended thickness in the pipe weld remains.
by Amdt. 192-27B, 45 FR 3272, Jan. 17, (c) A defective weld which cannot be re-
1980; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69660, Dec. 14, paired in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b)
1999] of this section must be repaired by installing a
full encirclement welded split sleeve of appro-
priate design.
§192.713 Transmission lines: Pe rmanent
field repair of imperfections and damages. [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended
by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
(a) Each imperfection or damage that impairs 1998]
the serviceability of pipe in a steel transmission
line operating at or above 40 percent of
SMYS must be-- §192.717 Transmission lines: Pe rmanent
(1) Removed by cutting out and replacing a field repair of leaks.
cylindrical piece of pipe; or
(2) Repaired by a method that reliable en- Each permanent field repair of a leak on a
gineering tests and analyses show can perma- transmission line must be made by--
nently restore the serviceability of the pipe. (a) Removing the leak by cutting out and
(b) Operating pressure must be at a safe replacing a cylindrical piece of pipe; or
level during repair operations. (b) Repairing the leak by one of the follow-
ing methods:
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended (1) Install a full encirclement welded split
by Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, sleeve of appropriate design, unless the trans-
1976; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69660, Dec. 14, mission line is joined by mechanical couplings
1999] and operates at less than 40 percent of SMYS.
88
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) If the leak is due to a corrosion pit, in- §192.721 Distribution systems: Patrol-
stall a properly designed bolt-on-leak clamp. ling.
(3) If the leak is due to a corrosion pit and
on pipe of not more than 40,000 psi (267 (a) The frequency of patrolling mains must
Mpa) SMYS, fillet weld over the pitted area a be determined by the severity of the conditions
steel plate patch with rounded corners, of the which could cause failure or leakage, and the
same or greater thickness than the pipe, and consequent hazards to public safety.
not more than one-half of the diameter of the (b) Mains in places or on structures where
pipe in size. anticipated physical movement or external
(4) If the leak is on a submerged offshore loading could cause failure or leakage must be
pipeline or submerged pipeline in inland navi- patrolled–
gable waters, mechanically apply a full encir- (1) In business districts, at intervals not
clement split sleeve of appropriate design. exceeding 4½ months, but at least four times
(5) Apply a method that reliable engineer- each calendar year; and
ing tests and analyses show can permanently (2) Outside business districts, at intervals
restore the serviceability of the pipe. not exceeding 7½ months, but at least twice
each calendar year.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
by Amdt. 192-11, 37 FR 21816, Oct. 14, [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
1972; Amdt. 192-27, 41 FR 34598, Aug. 16, by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21,
1976; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1982; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6,
1998; Amdt. 192-88, 64 FR 69660, Dec. 14, 1996]
1999]
91
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(b) Any defective or inadequate equipment (1) Constructed so that at least 50 percent
found must be promptly repaired or replaced. of its upright side area is permanently open; or
(c) Each remote control shutdown device (2) Located in an unattended field com-
must be inspected and tested at intervals not pressor station of 1,000 horsepower (746
exceeding 15 months, but at least once each kilowatts) or less.
calendar year, to determine that it functions (b) Except when shutdown of the system is
properly. necessary for maintenance under paragraph (c)
of this section, each gas detection and alarm
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended system required by this section must–
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, (1) Continuously monitor the compressor
1982] building for a concentration of gas in air of not
more than 25 percent of the lower explosive
limit; and
§192.733 [Removed] (2) If that concentration of gas is detected,
warn persons about to enter the building and
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended persons inside the building of the danger.
by Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11, (c) Each gas detection and alarm system
1994] required by this section must be maintained to
function properly. The maintenance must in-
clude performance tests.
§192.735 Compressor stations:
Storage of combustible materials. [Amdt. 192-69, 58 FR 48460, Sept. 16, 1993
as amended by Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500,
(a) Flammable or combustible materials in July 13, 1998]
quantities beyond those required for everyday
use, or other than those normally used in com-
pressor buildings, must be stored a safe dis- §192.737 [Removed]
tance from the compressor building.
(b) Above ground oil or gasoline storage [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
tanks must be protected in accordance with by Amdt. 192-71, 59 FR 6575, Feb. 11,
National Fire Protection Association Standard 1994]
No. 30.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] §192.739 Pressure limiting and regulating
stations: Inspection and testing.
§192.736 Compressor stations: Gas de- (a) Each pressure limiting station, relief de-
tection. vice (except rupture discs), and pressure regu-
lating station and its equipment must be sub-
(a) Not later than September 16, 1996, jected at intervals not exceeding 15 months,
each compressor building in a compressor sta- but at least once each calendar year, to inspec-
tion must have a fixed gas detection and alarm tions and tests to determine that it is–
system, unless the building is– (1) In good mechanical condition;
92
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) Adequate from the standpoint of ca- trict, taking into consideration the number of
pacity and reliability of operation for the ser- customers supplied, the operating pressures,
vice in which it is employed; the capacity of the installation, and other oper-
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of ating conditions.
this section, set to control or relieve at the cor- (c) If there are indications of abnormally
rect pressure consistent with the pressure limits high- or low-pressure, the regulator and the
of §192.201(a); and auxiliary equipment must be inspected and the
(4) Properly installed and protected from necessary measures employed to correct any
dirt, liquids, or other conditions that might pre- unsatisfactory operating conditions.
vent proper operation.
(b) For steel pipelines whose MAOP is [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970]
determined under §192.619(c), if the MAOP
is 60 psi (414 kPa) gage or more, the control
or relief pressure limit is as follows: §192.743 Pressure limiting and regulating
stations: Capacity of relief devices.
If the MAOP produces Then the pressure limit is:
a hoop stress that is:
Greater than 72 percent MAOP plus 4 percent.
(a) Pressure relief devices at pressure limit-
of SMYS ing stations and pressure regulating stations
Unknown as a percent- A pressure that will pre- must have sufficient capacity to protect the fa-
age of SMYS vent unsafe operation of cilities to which they are connected. Except as
the pipeline considering
provided in §192.739(b), the capacity must be
its operating and mainte-
nance history and MAOP. consistent with the pressure limits of
§192.201(a). This capacity must be deter-
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended mined at intervals not exceeding 15 months,
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, but at least once each calendar year, by testing
1982; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, the devices in place or by review and calcula-
2003; Amdt. 192-96, 69 FR 27861, May 17, tions.
2004] (b) If review and calculations are used to
determine if a device has sufficient capacity, the
calculated capacity must be compared with the
§192.741 Pressure limiting and regulating rated or experimentally determined relieving
stations: Telemetering or recording capacity of the device for the conditions under
gauges. which it operates. After the initial calculations,
subsequent calculations need not be made if
(a) Each distribution system supplied by the annual review documents that parameters
more than one district pressure regulating sta- have not changed to cause the rated or ex-
tion must be equipped with telemetering or re- perimentally determined relieving capacity to
cording pressure gauges to indicate the gas be insufficient.
pressure in the district. (c) If a relief device is of insufficient capac-
(b) On distribution systems supplied by a ity, a new or additional device must be installed
single district pressure regulating station, the to provide the capacity required by paragraph
operator shall determine the necessity of install- (a) of this section.
ing telemetering or recording gauges in the dis-
93
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended 1982; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15,
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, 2003]
1982; and Amdt. 192-55, 51 FR 41633. Nov. §192.749 Vault maintenance.
18, 1986; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept.
15, 2003; Amdt. 192-96, 69 FR 27861, May (a) Each vault housing pressure regulating
17, 2004] and pressure limiting equipment, and having a
volumetric internal content of 200 cubic feet
(5.66 cubic meters) or more, must be in-
§192.745 Valve maintenance: Transmis- spected at intervals not exceeding 15 months,
sion lines. but at least once each calendar year, to deter-
mine that it is in good physical condition and
(a) Each transmission line valve that might adequately ventilated.
be required during any emergency must be in- (b) If gas is found in the vault, the equip-
spected and partially operated at intervals not ment in the vault must be inspected for leaks,
exceeding 15 months, but at least once each and any leaks found must be repaired.
calendar year. (c) The ventilating equipment must also be
(b) Each operator must take prompt reme- inspected to determine that it is functioning
dial action to correct any valve found inoper- properly.
able, unless the operator designates an alterna- (d) Each vault cover must be inspected to
tive valve. assure that it does not present a hazard to pub-
lic safety.
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21, [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended
1982; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53895, Sept. 15, by Amdt. 192-43, 47 FR 46850, Oct. 21,
2003] 1982; Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13,
1998]
94
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
nents that contain a combustible mixture of gas pipeline must be protected, as necessary,
and air in the area of work. against damage during the disturbance by:
(c) Post warning signs, where appropriate. (1) Vibrations from heavy construction
equipment, trains, trucks, buses, or blasting;
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970] (2) Impact forces by vehicles;
(3) Earth movement;
(4) Apparent future excavations near the
§192.753 Caulked bell and spigot joints. pipeline; or
(5) Other foreseeable outside forces which
(a) Each cast iron caulked bell and spigot may subject that segment of the pipeline to
joint that is subject to pressures of more than bending stress.
25 psi (172kPa) gage must be sealed with: (b) As soon as feasible, appropriate steps
(1) A mechanical leak clamp; or must be taken to provide permanent protection
(2) A material or device which: for the disturbed segment from damage that
(i) Does not reduce the flexibility of the might result from external loads, including
joint; compliance with applicable requirements of
(ii) Permanently bonds, either chemically or §§ 192.317(a), 192.319, and 192.361 (b)–
mechanically, or both, with the bell and spigot (d).
metal surfaces or adjacent pipe metal surfaces;
and, [Amdt. 192-23, 41 FR 13589, Mar. 31,
(iii) Seals and bonds in a manner that meets 1976]
the strength, environmental, and chemical com-
patibility requirements of §§ 192.53(a) and (b)
and 192.143. §192.761 [Removed]
(b) Each cast iron caulked bell and spigot
joint that is subject to pressures of 25 psi [Amdt. 192-90, 67 FR 50824, Aug. 6, 2002
(172kPa) gage or less and is exposed for any as amended by Amdt. 192-94, 16 FR 69778,
reason must be sealed by a means other than Dec. 15, 2003]
caulking.
§192.809 General.
97
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Subpart O—Pipeline Integrity Manage- certain threats (i.e., external corrosion, internal
ment corrosion and stress corrosion cracking) to a
covered pipeline segment's integrity. The proc-
§192.901 What do the regulations in this ess includes the gathering and integration of
subpart cover? risk factor data, indirect examination or analy-
sis to identify areas of suspected corrosion,
This subpart prescribes minimum require- direct examination of the pipeline in these ar-
ments for an integrity management program on eas, and post assessment evaluation.
any gas transmission pipeline covered under
this part. For gas transmission pipelines con- High consequence area means an area
structed of plastic, only the requirements in established by one of the methods described in
§§ 192.917, 192.921, 192.935 and 192.937 paragraphs (1) or (2) as follows:
apply. (1) An area defined as—
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, (i) A Class 3 location under §192.5; or
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR (ii) A Class 4 location under §192.5; or
2307, December 22, 2003] (iii) Any area in a Class 1 or Class 2 loca-
tion where the potential impact radius is greater
than 660 feet (200 meters), and the area within
§192.903 What de finitions apply to this a potential impact circle contains 20 or more
subpart? buildings intended for human occupancy; or
(iv) Any area in a Class 1 or Class 2 loca-
The following definitions apply to this sub- tion where the potential impact circle contains
part: an identified site.
(2) The area within a potential impact circle
Assessment is the use of testing techniques containing—
as allowed in this subpart to ascertain the con- (i) 20 or more buildings intended for human
dition of a covered pipeline segment. occupancy, unless the exception in paragraph
(4) applies; or
Confirmatory direct assessment is an (ii) An identified site.
integrity assessment method using more fo- (3) Where a potential impact circle is cal-
cused application of the principles and tech- culated under either method (1) or (2) to es-
niques of direct assessment to identify internal tablish a high consequence area, the length of
and external corrosion in a covered transmis- the high consequence area extends axially
sion pipeline segment. along the length of the pipeline from the outer-
most edge of the first potential impact circle
Covered segment or covered pipeline that contains either an identified site or 20 or
segment means a segment of gas transmission more buildings intended for human occupancy
pipeline located in a high consequence area. to the outermost edge of the last contiguous
The terms gas and transmission line are defined potential impact circle that contains either an
in §192.3. identified site or 20 or more buildings intended
for human occupancy. (See Figure E.I.A. in
Direct assessment is an integrity assess- appendix E.)
ment method that utilizes a process to evaluate
98
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(4) If in identifying a high consequence area care facilities, retirement facilities or assisted-
under paragraph (1)(iii) of this definition or living facilities.
paragraph (2)(i) of this definition, the radius of Potential impact circle is a circle of ra-
the potential impact circle is greater than 660 dius equal to the potential impact radius (PIR).
feet (200 meters), the operator may identify a
high consequence area based on a prorated Potential impact radius (PIR) means
number of buildings intended for human occu- the radius of a circle within which the potential
pancy within a distance 660 feet (200 meters) failure of a pipeline could have significant im-
from the centerline of the pipeline until Decem- pact on people or property. PIR is determined
ber 17, 2006. If an operator chooses this ap- by the formula r = 0.69* (square root of
proach, the operator must prorate the number (p*d2)), where `r' is the radius of a circular
of buildings intended for human occupancy area in feet surrounding the point of failure, `p'
based on the ratio of an area with a radius of is the maximum allowable operating pressure
660 feet (200 meters) to the area of the poten- (MAOP) in the pipeline segment in pounds per
tial impact circle (i.e., the prorated number of square inch and `d' is the nominal diameter of
buildings intended for human occupancy is the pipeline in inches.
equal to [20 x (660 feet [or 200 meters ]/ po-
tential impact radius in feet [or meters])2]). Note: 0.69 is the factor for natural gas.
Identified site means each of the following This number will vary for other gases depend-
areas: ing upon their heat of combustion. An operator
(a) An outside area or open structure that transporting gas other than natural gas must use
is occupied by twenty (20) or more persons on section 3.2 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S-2001
at least 50 days in any twelve (12)-month pe- (Supplement to ASME B31.8; ibr, see
riod. (The days need not be consecutive.) Ex- §192.7) to calculate the impact radius formula.
amples include but are not limited to, beaches,
playgrounds, recreational facilities, camping Remediation is a repair or mitigation ac-
grounds, outdoor theaters, stadiums, recrea- tivity an operator takes on a covered segment
tional areas near a body of water, or areas out- to limit or reduce the probability of an unde-
side a rural building such as a religious facility); sired event occurring or the expected conse-
or quences from the event.
(b) A building that is occupied by twenty
(20) or more persons on at least five (5) days a [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
week for ten (10) weeks in any twelve (12)- 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
month period. (The days and weeks need not 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B,
be consecutive.) Examples include, but are not 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004; Amdt. 192-95C,
limited to, religious facilities, office buildings, 69 FR 29903, May 26, 2004]
community centers, general stores, 4-H facili-
ties, or roller skating rinks); or
(c) A facility occupied by persons who are §192.905 How does an operator ide ntify a
confined, are of impaired mobility, or would be high consequence area?
difficult to evacuate. Examples include but are
not limited to hospitals, prisons, schools, day- (a) General. To determine which segments
of an operator's transmission pipeline system
99
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
are covered by this subpart, an operator must high consequence area could satisfy any of the
identify the high consequence areas. An opera- definitions in §192.903, the operator must
tor must use method (1) or (2) from the defini- complete the evaluation using method (1) or
tion in §192.903 to identify a high consequence (2). If the segment is determined to meet the
area. An operator may apply one method to its definition as a high consequence area, it must
entire pipeline system, or an operator may ap- be incorporated into the operator's baseline
ply one method to individual portions of the assessment plan as a high consequence area
pipeline system. An operator must describe in within one year from the date the area is identi-
its integrity management program which fied.
method it is applying to each portion of the op-
erator's pipeline system. The description must [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
include the potential impact radius when utilized 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
to establish a high consequence area. (See ap- 2307, December 22, 2003]
pendix E.I. for guidance on identifying high
consequence areas.)
(b)(1) Identified sites. An operator must §192.907 What must an operator do to
identify an identified site, for purposes of this implement this subpart?
subpart, from information the operator has ob-
tained from routine operation and maintenance (a) General. No later than December 17,
activities and from public officials with safety or 2004, an operator of a covered pipeline seg-
emergency response or planning responsibilities ment must develop and follow a written integ-
who indicate to the operator that they know of rity management program that contains all the
locations that meet the identified site criteria. elements described in §192.911 and that ad-
These public officials could include officials on dresses the risks on each covered transmission
a local emergency planning commission or pipeline segment. The initial integrity manage-
relevant Native American tribal officials. ment program must consist, at a minimum, of a
(2) If a public official with safety or emer- framework that describes the process for im-
gency response or planning responsibilities in- plementing each program element, how rele-
forms an operator that it does not have the in- vant decisions will be made and by whom, a
formation to identify an identified site, the op- time line for completing the work to implement
erator must use one of the following sources, the program element, and how information
as appropriate, to identify these sites. gained from experience will be continuously
(i) Visible marking (e.g., a sign); or incorporated into the program. The framework
(ii) The site is licensed or registered by a will evolve into a more detailed and compre-
Federal, State, or local government agency; or hensive program. An operator must make con-
(iii) The site is on a list (including a list on tinual improvements to the program.
an internet web site) or map maintained by or (b) Implementation Standards. In carry-
available from a Federal, State, or local gov- ing out this subpart, an operator must follow
ernment agency and available to the general the requirements of this subpart and of
public. ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see §192.7) and its
(c) Newly identified areas. When an op- appendices, where specified. An operator may
erator has information that the area around a follow an equivalent standard or practice only
pipeline segment not previously identified as a when the operator demonstrates the alternative
100
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
standard or practice provides an equivalent §192.907) and evolves into a more detailed
level of safety to the public and property. In the and comprehensive integrity management pro-
event of a conflict between this subpart and gram, as information is gained and incorpo-
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, the requirements in this rated into the program. An operator must
subpart control. make continual improvements to its program.
The initial program framework and subsequent
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, program must, at minimum, contain the follow-
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR ing elements. (When indicated, refer to
2307, December 22, 2003] ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see §192.7) for
more detailed information on the listed ele-
ment.)
§192.909 How can an operator change its (a) An identification of all high conse-
integrity management program? quence areas, in accordance with §192.905.
(b) A baseline assessment plan meeting the
(a) General. An operator must document requirements of §192.919 and §192.921.
any change to its program and the reasons for (c) An identification of threats to each cov-
the change before implementing the change. ered pipeline segment, which must include data
(b) Notification. An operator must notify integration and a risk assessment. An operator
OPS, in accordance with §192.949, of any must use the threat identification and risk as-
change to the program that may substantially sessment to prioritize covered segments for
affect the program's implementation or may assessment (§192.917) and to evaluate the
significantly modify the program or schedule for merits of additional preventive and mitigative
carrying out the program elements. An opera- measures (§192.935) for each covered seg-
tor must also notify a State or local pipeline ment.
safety authority when either a covered segment (d) A direct assessment plan, if applicable,
is located in a State where OPS has an inter- meeting the requirements of §192.923, and
state agent agreement, or an intrastate covered depending on the threat assessed, of
segment is regulated by that State. An operator §§ 192.925, 192.927, or 192.929.
must provide the notification within 30 days (e) Provisions meeting the requirements of
after adopting this type of change into its pro- §192.933 for remediating conditions found
gram. during an integrity assessment.
(f) A process for continual evaluation and
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, assessment meeting the requirements of
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR §192.937.
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, (g) If applicable, a plan for confirmatory
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] direct assessment meeting the requirements of
§192.931.
(h) Provisions meeting the requirements of
§192.911 What are the elements of an in- §192.935 for adding preventive and mitigative
tegrity management program? measures to protect the high consequence
area.
An operator's initial integrity management (i) A performance plan as outlined in
program begins with a framework (see ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 9 that includes
101
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
performance measures meeting the require- §192.913 When may an operator deviate
ments of §192.945. its program from certain requirements of
(j) Record keeping provisions meeting the this subpart?
requirements of §192.947.
(k) A management of change process as (a) General. ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr,
outlined in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 11. see §192.7) provides the essential features of a
(l) A quality assurance process as outlined performance-based or a prescriptive integrity
in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 12. management program. An operator that uses a
(m) A communication plan that includes the performance-based approach that satisfies the
elements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 10, requirements for exceptional performance in
and that includes procedures for addressing paragraph (b) of this section may deviate from
safety concerns raised by— certain requirements in this subpart, as pro-
(1) OPS; and vided in paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) A State or local pipeline safety author- (b) Exceptional performance. An opera-
ity when a covered segment is located in a tor must be able to demonstrate the excep-
State where OPS has an interstate agent tional performance of its integrity management
agreement. program through the following actions.
(n) Procedures for providing (when re- (1) To deviate from any of the require-
quested), by electronic or other means, a copy ments set forth in paragraph (c) of this section,
of the operator's risk analysis or integrity man- an operator must have a performance-based
agement program to— integrity management program that meets or
(1) OPS; and exceed the performance-based requirements of
(2) A State or local pipeline safety author- ASME/ANSI B31.8S and includes, at a mini-
ity when a covered segment is located in a mum, the following elements—
State where OPS has an interstate agent (i) A comprehensive process for risk
agreement. analysis;
(o) Procedures for ensuring that each in- (ii) All risk factor data used to support the
tegrity assessment is being conducted in a program;
manner that minimizes environmental and safety (iii) A comprehensive data integration
risks. process;
(p) A process for identification and as- (iv) A procedure for applying lessons
sessment of newly-identified high consequence learned from assessment of covered pipeline
areas. (See §192.905 and §192.921.) segments to pipeline segments not covered by
this subpart;
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, (v) A procedure for evaluating every inci-
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR dent, including its cause, within the operator's
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, sector of the pipeline industry for implications
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] both to the operator's pipeline system and to
the operator's integrity management program;
(vi) A performance matrix that demon-
strates the program has been effective in ensur-
ing the integrity of the covered segments by
102
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
controlling the identified threats to the covered the time frame will not jeopardize the safety of
segments; the covered segment.
(vii) Semi-annual performance measures
beyond those required in §192.945 that are [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
part of the operator's performance plan. (See 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
§192.911(i).) An operator must submit these 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B,
measures, by electronic or other means, on a 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
semi-annual frequency to OPS in accordance
with §192.951; and
(viii) An analysis that supports the desired §192.915 What knowledge and training
integrity reassessment interval and the remedia- must personnel have to carry out an integ-
tion methods to be used for all covered seg- rity management program?
ments.
(2) In addition to the requirements for the (a) Supervisory personnel. The integrity
performance-based plan, an operator must— management program must provide that each
(i) Have completed at least two integrity supervisor whose responsibilities relate to the
assessments on each covered pipeline segment integrity management program possesses and
the operator is including under the perform- maintains a thorough knowledge of the integrity
ance-based approach, and be able to demon- management program and of the elements for
strate that each assessment effectively ad- which the supervisor is responsible. The pro-
dressed the identified threats on the covered gram must provide that any person who quali-
segment. fies as a supervisor for the integrity manage-
(ii) Remediate all anomalies identified in the ment program has appropriate training or ex-
more recent assessment according to the re- perience in the area for which the person is
quirements in §192.933, and incorporate the responsible.
results and lessons learned from the more re- (b) Persons who carry out assessments
cent assessment into the operator's data inte- and evaluate assessment results. The integ-
gration and risk assessment. rity management program must provide criteria
(c) Deviation. Once an operator has for the qualification of any person—
demonstrated that it has satisfied the require- (1) Who conducts an integrity assessment
ments of paragraph (b) of this section, the op- allowed under this subpart; or
erator may deviate from the prescriptive re- (2) Who reviews and analyzes the results
quirements of ASME/ANSI B31.8S and of from an integrity assessment and evaluation; or
this subpart only in the following instances. (3) Who makes decisions on actions to be
(1) The time frame for reassessment as taken based on these assessments.
provided in §192.939 except that reassess- (c) Persons responsible for preventive
ment by some method allowed under this sub- and mitigative measures. The integrity man-
part (e.g., confirmatory direct assessment) agement program must provide criteria for the
must be carried out at intervals no longer than qualification of any person—
seven years; (1) Who implements preventive and mitiga-
(2) The time frame for remediation as pro- tive measures to carry out this subpart, includ-
vided in §192.933 if the operator demonstrates ing the marking and locating of buried struc-
tures; or
103
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) Who directly supervises excavation history, corrosion control records, continuing
work carried out in conjunction with an integ- surveillance records, patrolling records, main-
rity assessment. tenance history, internal inspection records and
all other conditions specific to each pipeline.
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, (c) Risk assessment. An operator must
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR conduct a risk assessment that follows
2307, December 22, 2003] ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5, and consid-
ers the identified threats for each covered seg-
ment. An operator must use the risk assess-
§192.917 How does an operator ide ntify ment to prioritize the covered segments for the
potential threats to pipeline integrity and baseline and continual reassessments
use the threat identification in its integrity (§§ 192.919, 192.921, 192.937), and to de-
program? termine what additional preventive and mitiga-
tive measures are needed (§192.935) for the
(a) Threat identification. An operator covered segment.
must identify and evaluate all potential threats (d) Plastic transmission pipeline. An op-
to each covered pipeline segment. Potential erator of a plastic transmission pipeline must
threats that an operator must consider include, assess the threats to each covered segment
but are not limited to, the threats listed in using the information in sections 4 and 5 of
ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see §192.7), sec- ASME B31.8S, and consider any threats
tion 2, which are grouped under the following unique to the integrity of plastic pipe.
four categories: (e) Actions to address particular threats.
(1) Time dependent threats such as internal If an operator identifies any of the following
corrosion, external corrosion, and stress corro- threats, the operator must take the following
sion cracking; actions to address the threat.
(2) Static or resident threats, such as fabri- (1) Third party damage. An operator
cation or construction defects; must utilize the data integration required in
(3) Time independent threats such as third paragraph (b) of this section and ASME/ANSI
party damage and outside force damage; and B31.8S, Appendix A7 to determine the sus-
(4) Human error. ceptibility of each covered segment to the
(b) Data gathering and integration. To threat of third party damage. If an operator
identify and evaluate the potential threats to a identifies the threat of third party damage, the
covered pipeline segment, an operator must operator must implement comprehensive addi-
gather and integrate existing data and informa- tional preventive measures in accordance with
tion on the entire pipeline that could be relevant §192.935 and monitor the effectiveness of the
to the covered segment. In performing this data preventive measures. If, in conducting a base-
gathering and integration, an operator must fol- line assessment under §192.921, or a reas-
low the requirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, sessment under §192.937, an operator uses an
section 4. At a minimum, an operator must internal inspection tool or external corrosion
gather and evaluate the set of data specified in direct assessment, the operator must integrate
Appendix A to ASME/ANSI B31.8S, and data from these assessments with data related
consider both on the covered segment and to any encroachment or foreign line crossing on
similar non-covered segments, past incident the covered segment, to define where potential
104
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
indications of third party damage may exist in (iii) The stresses leading to cyclic fatigue
the covered segment. increase.
An operator must also have procedures in (4) ERW pipe. If a covered pipeline seg-
its integrity management program addressing ment contains low frequency electric resistance
actions it will take to respond to findings from welded pipe (ERW), lap welded pipe or other
this data integration. pipe that satisfies the conditions specified in
(2) Cyclic fatigue. An operator must ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendices A4.3 and
evaluate whether cyclic fatigue or other loading A4.4, and any covered or noncovered segment
condition (including ground movement, suspen- in the pipeline system with such pipe has ex-
sion bridge condition) could lead to a failure of perienced seam failure, or operating pressure
a deformation, including a dent or gouge, or on the covered segment has increased over the
other defect in the covered segment. An maximum operating pressure experienced dur-
evaluation must assume the presence of threats ing the preceding five years, an operator must
in the covered segment that could be exacer- select an assessment technology or technolo-
bated by cyclic fatigue. An operator must use gies with a proven application capable of as-
the results from the evaluation together with the sessing seam integrity and seam corrosion
criteria used to evaluate the significance of this anomalies. The operator must prioritize the
threat to the covered segment to prioritize the covered segment as a high risk segment for the
integrity baseline assessment or reassessment. baseline assessment or a subsequent reassess-
(3) Manufacturing and construction de- ment.
fects. If an operator identifies the threat of (5) Corrosion. If an operator identifies
manufacturing and construction defects (includ- corrosion on a covered pipeline segment that
ing seam defects) in the covered segment, an could adversely affect the integrity of the line
operator must analyze the covered segment to (conditions specified in §192.933), the opera-
determine the risk of failure from these defects. tor must evaluate and remediate, as necessary,
The analysis must consider the results of prior all pipeline segments (both covered and non-
assessments on the covered segment. An op- covered) with similar material coating and envi-
erator may consider manufacturing and con- ronmental characteristics. An operator must
struction related defects to be stable defects if establish a schedule for evaluating and reme-
the operating pressure on the covered segment diating, as necessary, the similar segments that
has not increased over the maximum operating is consistent with the operator's established
pressure experienced during the five years pre- operating and maintenance procedures under
ceding identification of the high consequence part 192 for testing and repair.
area. If any of the following changes occur in
the covered segment, an operator must priori- [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
tize the covered segment as a high risk segment 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
for the baseline assessment or a subsequent 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B,
reassessment. 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
(i) Operating pressure increases above the
maximum operating pressure experienced dur-
ing the preceding five years;
(ii) MAOP increases; or
105
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
§192.919 What must be in the baseline the following methods depending on the threats
assessment plan? to which the covered segment is susceptible.
An operator must select the method or meth-
An operator must include each of the fol- ods best suited to address the threats identified
lowing elements in its written baseline assess- to the covered segment (See §192.917).
ment plan: (1) Internal inspection tool or tools capable
(a) Identification of the potential threats to of detecting corrosion, and any other threats to
each covered pipeline segment and the infor- which the covered segment is susceptible. An
mation supporting the threat identification. (See operator must follow ASME/ANSI B31.8S
§192.917.); (ibr, see §192.7), section 6.2 in selecting the
(b) The methods selected to assess the appropriate internal inspection tools for the
integrity of the line pipe, including an explana- covered segment.
tion of why the assessment method was se- (2) Pressure test conducted in accordance
lected to address the identified threats to each with subpart J of this part. An operator must
covered segment. The integrity assessment use the test pressures specified in Table 3 of
method an operator uses must be based on the section 5 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, to justify
threats identified to the covered segment. (See an extended reassessment interval in accor-
§192.917.) More than one method may be dance with §192.939.
required to address all the threats to the cov- (3) Direct assessment to address threats of
ered pipeline segment; external corrosion, internal corrosion, and
(c) A schedule for completing the integrity stress corrosion cracking. An operator must
assessment of all covered segments, including conduct the direct assessment in accordance
risk factors considered in establishing the as- with the requirements listed in §192.923 and
sessment schedule; with, as applicable, the requirements specified
(d) If applicable, a direct assessment plan in §§ 192.925, 192.927 or 192.929;
that meets the requirements of §§ 192.923, (4) Other technology that an operator
and depending on the threat to be addressed, demonstrates can provide an equivalent under-
of §192.925, §192.927, or §192.929; and standing of the condition of the line pipe. An
(e) A procedure to ensure that the baseline operator choosing this option must notify the
assessment is being conducted in a manner that Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) 180 days be-
minimizes environmental and safety risks. fore conducting the assessment, in accordance
with §192.949. An operator must also notify a
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, State or local pipeline safety authority when
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR either a covered segment is located in a State
2307, December 22, 2003] where OPS has an interstate agent agreement,
or an intrastate covered segment is regulated
by that State.
§192.921 How is the baseline assessment (b) Prioritizing segments. An operator
to be conducted? must prioritize the covered pipeline segments
for the baseline assessment according to a risk
(a) Assessment methods. An operator analysis that considers the potential threats to
must assess the integrity of the line pipe in each each covered segment. The risk analysis must
covered segment by applying one or more of comply with the requirements in §192.917.
106
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(c) Assessment for particular threats. In (h) Plastic transmission pipeline. If the
choosing an assessment method for the base- threat analysis required in §192.917(d) on a
line assessment of each covered segment, an plastic transmission pipeline indicates that a
operator must take the actions required in covered segment is susceptible to failure from
§192.917(d) to address particular threats that causes other than third-party damage, an op-
it has identified. erator must conduct a baseline assessment of
(d) Time period. An operator must priori- the segment in accordance with the require-
tize all the covered segments for assessment in ments of this section and of §192.917. The
accordance with §192.917 (c) and paragraph operator must justify the use of an alternative
(b) of this section. An operator must assess at assessment method that will address the identi-
least 50% of the covered segments beginning fied threats to the covered segment.
with the highest risk segments, by December
17, 2007. An operator must complete the [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
baseline assessment of all covered segments by 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
December 17, 2012. 2307, December 22, 2003]
(e) Prior assessment. An operator may
use a prior integrity assessment conducted be-
fore December 17, 2002 as a baseline assess- §192.923 How is direct assessment used
ment for the covered segment, if the integrity and for what threats?
assessment meets the baseline requirements in
this subpart and subsequent remedial actions to (a) General. An operator may use direct
address the conditions listed in §192.933 have assessment either as a primary assessment
been carried out. In addition, if an operator method or as a supplement to the other as-
uses this prior assessment as its baseline as- sessment methods allowed under this subpart.
sessment, the operator must reassess the line An operator may only use direct assessment as
pipe in the covered segment according to the the primary assessment method to address the
requirements of §192.937 and §192.939. identified threats of external corrosion
(f) Newly identified areas. When an op- (ECDA), internal corrosion (ICDA), and stress
erator identifies a new high consequence area corrosion cracking (SCCDA).
(see §192.905), an operator must complete (b) Primary method. An operator using
the baseline assessment of the line pipe in the direct assessment as a primary assessment
newly identified high consequence area within method must have a plan that complies with the
ten (10) years from the date the area is identi- requirements in—
fied. (1) ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see
(g) Newly installed pipe. An operator §192.7), section 6.4; NACE RP0502-2002
must complete the baseline assessment of a (ibr, see §192.7); and §192.925 if addressing
newly-installed segment of pipe covered by this external corrosion (ECDA).
subpart within ten (10) years from the date the (2) ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 6.4 and
pipe is installed. An operator may conduct a appendix B2, and §192.927 if addressing in-
pressure test in accordance with paragraph ternal corrosion (ICDA).
(a)(2) of this section, to satisfy the requirement (3) ASME/ANSI B31.8S, appendix A3,
for a baseline assessment. and §192.929 if addressing stress corrosion
cracking (SCCDA).
107
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(c) Supplemental method. An operator (i) Provisions for applying more restrictive
using direct assessment as a supplemental as- criteria when conducting ECDA for the first
sessment method for any applicable threat must time on a covered segment; and
have a plan that follows the requirements for (ii) The basis on which an operator selects
confirmatory direct assessment in §192.931. at least two different, but complementary indi-
rect assessment tools to assess each ECDA
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, Region. If an operator utilizes an indirect in-
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR spection method that is not discussed in Ap-
2307, December 22, 2003] pendix A of NACE RP0502-2002, the opera-
tor must demonstrate the applicability, valida-
tion basis, equipment used, application proce-
§192.925 What are the requirements for dure, and utilization of data for the inspection
using External Corrosion Direct Assess- method.
ment (ECDA)? (2) Indirect examination. In addition to the
requirements in ASME/
(a) Definition. ECDA is a four-step proc- ANSI B31.8S section 6.4 and NACE RP
ess that combines preassessment, indirect in- 0502-2002, section 4, the plan's procedures
spection, direct examination, and post assess- for indirect examination of the ECDA regions
ment to evaluate the threat of external corro- must include—
sion to the integrity of a pipeline. (i) Provisions for applying more restrictive
(b) General requirements. An operator criteria when conducting ECDA for the first
that uses direct assessment to assess the threat time on a covered segment;
of external corrosion must follow the require- (ii) Criteria for identifying and documenting
ments in this section, in ASME/ANSI B31.8S those indications that must be considered for
(ibr, see § 192.7), section 6.4, and in NACE excavation and direct examination. Minimum
RP 0502-2002 (ibr, see § 192.7). An operator identification criteria include the known sensi-
must develop and implement a direct assess- tivities of assessment tools, the procedures for
ment plan that has procedures addressing pre- using each tool, and the approach to be used
assessment, indirect examination, direct exami- for decreasing the physical spacing of indirect
nation, and post-assessment. If the ECDA de- assessment tool readings when the presence of
tects pipeline coating damage, the operator a defect is suspected;
must also integrate the data from the ECDA (iii) Criteria for defining the urgency of ex-
with other information from the data integration cavation and direct examination of each indica-
(§ 192.917(b)) to evaluate the covered seg- tion identified during the indirect examination.
ment for the threat of third party damage, and These criteria must specify how an operator will
to address the threat as required by § define the urgency of excavating the indication
192.917(e)(1). as immediate, scheduled or monitored; and
(1) Preassessment. In addition to the re- (iv) Criteria for scheduling excavation of
quirements in ASME/ANSI B31.8S section 6.4 indications for each urgency level.
and NACE RP 0502-2002, section 3, the (3) Direct examination. In addition to the
plan's procedures for preassessment must in- requirements in ASME/
clude— ANSI B31.8S section 6.4 and NACE RP
0502-2002, section 5, the plan's procedures
108
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
for direct examination of indications from the §192.927 What are the requirements for
indirect examination must include— using Internal Corrosion Direct Assess-
(i) Provisions for applying more restrictive ment (ICDA)?
criteria when conducting ECDA for the first
time on a covered segment; (a) Definition. Internal Corrosion Direct
(ii) Criteria for deciding what action should Assessment (ICDA) is a process an operator
be taken if either: uses to identify areas along the pipeline where
(A) Corrosion defects are discovered that fluid or other electrolyte introduced during
exceed allowable limits (Section 5.5.2.2 of normal operation or by an upset condition may
NACE RP0502-2002), or reside, and then focuses direct examination on
(B) Root cause analysis reveals conditions the locations in covered segments where inter-
for which ECDA is not suitable (Section 5.6.2 nal corrosion is most likely to exist. The proc-
of NACE RP0502-2002); ess identifies the potential for internal corrosion
(iii) Criteria and notification procedures for caused by microorganisms, or fluid with CO2,
any changes in the ECDA Plan, including O2, hydrogen sulfide or other contaminants
changes that affect the severity classification, the present in the gas.
priority of direct examination, and the time (b) General requirements. An operator
frame for direct examination of indications; and using direct assessment as an assessment
(iv) Criteria that describe how and on what method to address internal corrosion in a cov-
basis an operator will reclassify and reprioritize ered pipeline segment must follow the require-
any of the provisions that are specified in sec- ments in this section and in ASME/ANSI
tion 5.9 of NACE RP0502-2002. B31.8S (ibr, see §192.7), section 6.4 and ap-
(4) Post assessment and continuing pendix B2. The ICDA process described in
evaluation. In addition to the requirements in this section applies only for a segment of pipe
ASME/ANSI B31.8S section 6.4 and NACE transporting nominally dry natural gas, and not
RP 0502-2002, section 6, the plan's proce- for a segment with electrolyte nominally present
dures for post assessment of the effectiveness in the gas stream. If an operator uses ICDA to
of the ECDA process must include— assess a covered segment operating with elec-
(i) Measures for evaluating the long-term trolyte present in the gas stream, the operator
effectiveness of ECDA in addressing external must develop a plan that demonstrates how it
corrosion in covered segments; and will conduct ICDA in the segment to effectively
(ii) Criteria for evaluating whether condi- address internal corrosion, and must provide
tions discovered by direct examination of indi- notification in accordance with §192.921
cations in each ECDA region indicate a need (a)(4) or §192.937(c)(4).
for reassessment of the covered segment at an (c) The ICDA plan. An operator must de-
interval less than that specified in § 192.939. velop and follow an ICDA plan that provides
(See Appendix D of NACE RP0502-2002.) for preassessment, identification of ICDA re-
gions and excavation locations, detailed exami-
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, nation of pipe at excavation locations, and
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR post-assessment evaluation and monitoring.
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95C, (1) Preassessment. In the preassessment
69 FR 29903, May 26, 2004] stage, an operator must gather and integrate
data and information needed to evaluate the
109
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
feasibility of ICDA for the covered segment, the model in GRI 02-0057, “Internal Corro-
and to support use of a model to identify the sion Direct Assessment of Gas Transmission
locations along the pipe segment where elec- Pipelines—Methodology,” (ibr, see §192.7).
trolyte may accumulate, to identify ICDA re- An operator may use another model if the op-
gions, and to identify areas within the covered erator demonstrates it is equivalent to the one
segment where liquids may potentially be en- shown in GRI 02-0057. A model must con-
trained. This data and information includes, but sider changes in pipe diameter, locations where
is not limited to— gas enters a line (potential to introduce liquid)
(i) All data elements listed in appendix A2 and locations down stream of gas draw-offs
of ASME/ANSI B31.8S; (where gas velocity is reduced) to define the
(ii) Information needed to support use of a critical pipe angle of inclination above which
model that an operator must use to identify ar- water film cannot be transported by the gas.
eas along the pipeline where internal corrosion (3) Identification of locations for exca-
is most likely to occur. (See paragraph (a) of vation and direct examination. An opera-
this section.) This information, includes, but is tor's plan must identify the locations where in-
not limited to, location of all gas input and with- ternal corrosion is most likely in each ICDA
drawal points on the line; location of all low region. In the location identification process, an
points on covered segments such as sags, operator must identify a minimum of two loca-
drips, inclines, valves, manifolds, dead-legs, tions for excavation within each ICDA Region
and traps; the elevation profile of the pipeline in within a covered segment and must perform a
sufficient detail that angles of inclination can be direct examination for internal corrosion at
calculated for all pipe segments; and the di- each location, using ultrasonic thickness meas-
ameter of the pipeline, and the range of ex- urements, radiography, or other generally ac-
pected gas velocities in the pipeline; cepted measurement technique. One location
(iii) Operating experience data that would must be the low point (e.g., sags, drips, valves,
indicate historic upsets in gas conditions, loca- manifolds, dead-legs, traps) within the covered
tions where these upsets have occurred, and segment nearest to the beginning of the ICDA
potential damage resulting from these upset Region. The second location must be further
conditions; and downstream, within a covered segment, near
(iv) Information on covered segments the end of the ICDA Region. If corrosion ex-
where cleaning pigs may not have been used or ists at either location, the operator must—
where cleaning pigs may deposit electrolytes. (i) Evaluate the severity of the defect (re-
(2) ICDA region identification. An op- maining strength) and remediate the defect in
erator's plan must identify where all ICDA Re- accordance with §192.933;
gions are located in the transmission system, in (ii) As part of the operator's current integ-
which covered segments are located. An rity assessment either perform additional exca-
ICDA Region extends from the location where vations in each covered segment within the
liquid may first enter the pipeline and encom- ICDA region, or use an alternative assessment
passes the entire area along the pipeline where method allowed by this subpart to assess the
internal corrosion may occur and where further line pipe in each covered segment within the
evaluation is needed. An ICDA Region may ICDA region for internal corrosion; and
encompass one or more covered segments. In (iii) Evaluate the potential for internal cor-
the identification process, an operator must use rosion in all pipeline segments (both covered
110
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
and non-covered) in the operator's pipeline (B) Assess the covered segment using an-
system with similar characteristics to the ICDA other integrity assessment method allowed by
region containing the covered segment in which this subpart.
the corrosion was found, and as appropriate, (5) Other requirements. The ICDA plan
remediate the conditions the operator finds in must also include—
accordance with §192.933. (i) Criteria an operator will apply in making
(4) Post-assessment evaluation and key decisions (e.g., ICDA feasibility, definition
monitoring. An operator's plan must provide of ICDA Regions, conditions requiring excava-
for evaluating the effectiveness of the ICDA tion) in implementing each stage of the ICDA
process and continued monitoring of covered process;
segments where internal corrosion has been (ii) Provisions for applying more restrictive
identified. The evaluation and monitoring proc- criteria when conducting ICDA for the first
ess includes— time on a covered segment and that become
(i) Evaluating the effectiveness of ICDA as less stringent as the operator gains experience;
an assessment method for addressing internal and
corrosion and determining whether a covered (iii) Provisions that analysis be carried out
segment should be reassessed at more frequent on the entire pipeline in which covered seg-
intervals than those specified in §192.939. An ments are present, except that application of
operator must carry out this evaluation within a the remediation criteria of §192.933 may be
year of conducting an ICDA; and limited to covered segments.
(ii) Continually monitoring each covered
segment where internal corrosion has been [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
identified using techniques such as coupons, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
UT sensors or electronic probes, periodically 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B,
drawing off liquids at low points and chemically 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
analyzing the liquids for the presence of corro-
sion products. An operator must base the fre-
quency of the monitoring and liquid analysis on §192.929 What are the requirements for
results from all integrity assessments that have using Direct Assessment for Stress Corro-
been conducted in accordance with the re- sion Cracking (SCCDA)?
quirements of this subpart, and risk factors
specific to the covered segment. If an operator (a) Definition. Stress Corrosion Cracking
finds any evidence of corrosion products in the Direct Assessment (SCCDA) is a process to
covered segment, the operator must take assess a covered pipe segment for the pres-
prompt action in accordance with one of the ence of SCC primarily by systematically gath-
two following required actions and remediate ering and analyzing excavation data for pipe
the conditions the operator finds in accordance having similar operational characteristics and
with §192.933. residing in a similar physical environment.
(A) Conduct excavations of covered seg- (b) General requirements. An operator
ments at locations downstream from where the using direct assessment as an integrity assess-
electrolyte might have entered the pipe; or ment method to address stress corrosion
cracking in a covered pipeline segment must
have a plan that provides, at minimum, for—
111
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(1) Data gathering and integration. An op- sion must comply with §192.925 with the fol-
erator's plan must provide for a systematic lowing exceptions.
process to collect and evaluate data for all (1) The procedures for indirect examina-
covered segments to identify whether the con- tion may allow use of only one indirect exami-
ditions for SCC are present and to prioritize nation tool suitable for the application.
the covered segments for assessment. This (2) The procedures for direct examination
process must include gathering and evaluating and remediation must provide that—
data related to SCC at all sites an operator (i) All immediate action indications must be
excavates during the conduct of its pipeline excavated for each ECDA region; and
operations where the criteria in ASME/ANSI (ii) At least one high risk indication that
B31.8S (ibr, see §192.7), appendix A3.3 indi- meets the criteria of scheduled action must be
cate the potential for SCC. This data includes excavated in each ECDA region.
at minimum, the data specified in ASME/ANSI (c) Internal corrosion plan. An operator's
B31.8S, appendix A3. CDA plan for identifying internal corrosion
(2) Assessment method. The plan must must comply with §192.927 except that the
provide that if conditions for SCC are identi- plan's procedures for identifying locations for
fied in a covered segment, an operator must excavation may require excavation of only one
assess the covered segment using an integrity high risk location in each ICDA region.
assessment method specified in ASME/ANSI (d) Defects requiring near-term reme-
B31.8S, appendix A3, and remediate the diation. If an assessment carried out under
threat in accordance with ASME/ANSI paragraph (b) or (c) of this section reveals any
B31.8S, appendix A3, section A3.4. defect requiring remediation prior to the next
scheduled assessment, the operator must
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, schedule the next assessment in accordance
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR with NACE RP 0502-2002 (ibr, see §192.7),
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, section 6.2 and 6.3. If the defect requires im-
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] mediate remediation, then the operator must
reduce pressure consistent with §192.933 until
the operator has completed reassessment using
§192.931 How may Confirmatory Direct one of the assessment techniques allowed in
Assessment (CDA) be used? §192.937.
An operator using the confirmatory direct [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
assessment (CDA) method as allowed in 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
§192.937 must have a plan that meets the re- 2307, December 22, 2003]
quirements of this section and of §§ 192.925
(ECDA) and §192.927 (ICDA).
(a) Threats. An operator may only use §192.933 What actions must be taken to
CDA on a covered segment to identify damage address integrity issues?
resulting from external corrosion or internal
corrosion. (a) General requirements. An operator
(b) External corrosion plan. An opera- must take prompt action to address all anoma-
tor's CDA plan for identifying external corro- lous conditions that the operator discovers
112
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
through the integrity assessment. In addressing the operator demonstrates that the 180-day
all conditions, an operator must evaluate all period is impracticable.
anomalous conditions and remediate those that (c) Schedule for evaluation and reme-
could reduce a pipeline's integrity. An operator diation. An operator must complete remedia-
must be able to demonstrate that the remedia- tion of a condition according to a schedule that
tion of the condition will ensure that the condi- prioritizes the conditions for evaluation and
tion is unlikely to pose a threat to the integrity remediation. Unless a special requirement for
of the pipeline until the next reassessment of the remediating certain conditions applies, as pro-
covered segment. If an operator is unable to vided in paragraph (d) of this section, an op-
respond within the time limits for certain condi- erator must follow the schedule in
tions specified in this section, the operator must ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see §192.7), sec-
temporarily reduce the operating pressure of tion 7, Figure 4. If an operator cannot meet the
the pipeline or take other action that ensures schedule for any condition, the operator must
the safety of the covered segment. If pressure justify the reasons why it cannot meet the
is reduced, an operator must determine the schedule and that the changed schedule will not
temporary reduction in operating pressure us- jeopardize public safety. An operator must no-
ing ASME/ANSI B31G (ibr, see §192.7) or tify OPS in accordance with §192.949 if it
AGA Pipeline Research Committee Project cannot meet the schedule and cannot provide
PR-3-805 (“RSTRENG”; ibr, see §192.7) or safety through a temporary reduction in operat-
reduce the operating pressure to a level not ing pressure or other action. An operator must
exceeding 80% of the level at the time the con- also notify a State or local pipeline safety au-
dition was discovered. (See appendix A to this thority when either a covered segment is lo-
part 192 for information on availability of in- cated in a State where OPS has an interstate
corporation by reference information). A re- agent agreement, or an intrastate covered seg-
duction in operating pressure cannot exceed ment is regulated by that State.
365 days without an operator providing a (d) Special requirements for scheduling
technical justification that the continued pres- remediation.—(1) Immediate repair condi-
sure restriction will not jeopardize the integrity tions. An operator's evaluation and remediation
of the pipeline. schedule must follow ASME/ANSI B31.8S,
(b) Discovery of condition. Discovery of section 7 in providing for immediate repair
a condition occurs when an operator has ade- conditions. To maintain safety, an operator
quate information about a condition to deter- must temporarily reduce operating pressure in
mine that the condition presents a potential accordance with paragraph (a) of this section
threat to the integrity of the pipeline. A condi- or shut down the pipeline until the operator
tion that presents a potential threat includes, completes the repair of these conditions. An
but is not limited to, those conditions that re- operator must treat the following conditions as
quire remediation or monitoring listed under immediate repair conditions:
paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this sec- (i) A calculation of the remaining strength
tion. An operator must promptly, but no later of the pipe shows a predicted failure pressure
than 180 days after conducting an integrity as- less than or equal to 1.1 times the maximum
sessment, obtain sufficient information about a allowable operating pressure at the location of
condition to make that determination, unless the anomaly. Suitable remaining strength calcu-
lation methods include, ASME/ANSI B31G;
113
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
RSTRENG; or an alternative equivalent (NPS) 12), and engineering analyses of the
method of remaining strength calculation. These dent demonstrate critical strain levels are not
documents are incorporated by reference and exceeded.
available at the addresses listed in appendix A (iii) A dent with a depth greater than 2% of
to part 192. the pipeline's diameter (0.250 inches in depth
(ii) A dent that has any indication of metal for a pipeline diameter less than NPS 12) that
loss, cracking or a stress riser. affects pipe curvature at a girth weld or a longi-
(iii) An indication or anomaly that in the tudinal seam weld, and engineering analyses of
judgment of the person designated by the op- the dent and girth or seam weld demonstrate
erator to evaluate the assessment results re- critical strain levels are not exceeded. These
quires immediate action. analyses must consider weld properties.
(2) One-year conditions. Except for con-
ditions listed in paragraph (d)(1) and (d)(3) of [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
this section, an operator must remediate any of 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
the following within one year of discovery of 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B,
the condition: 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
(i) A smooth dent located between the 8
o'clock and 4 o'clock positions (upper ? of
the pipe) with a depth greater than 6% of the §192.935 What additional preventive and
pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50 inches in mitigative measures must an operator
depth for a pipeline diameter less than Nominal take?
Pipe Size (NPS) 12).
(ii) A dent with a depth greater than 2% of (a) General requirements. An operator
the pipeline's diameter (0.250 inches in depth must take additional measures beyond those
for a pipeline diameter less than NPS 12) that already required by Part 192 to prevent a
affects pipe curvature at a girth weld or at a pipeline failure and to mitigate the conse-
longitudinal seam weld. quences of a pipeline failure in a high conse-
(3) Monitored conditions. An operator quence area. An operator must base the addi-
does not have to schedule the following condi- tional measures on the threats the operator has
tions for remediation, but must record and identified to each pipeline segment. (See
monitor the conditions during subsequent risk §192.917) An operator must conduct, in ac-
assessments and integrity assessments for any cordance with one of the risk assessment ap-
change that may require remediation: proaches in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see
(i) A dent with a depth greater than 6% of §192.7), section 5, a risk analysis of its pipe-
the pipeline diameter (greater than 0.50 inches line to identify additional measures to protect
in depth for a pipeline diameter less than NPS the high consequence area and enhance public
12) located between the 4 o'clock position and safety. Such additional measures include, but
the 8 o'clock position (bottom ? of the pipe). are not limited to, installing Automatic Shut-off
(ii) A dent located between the 8 o'clock Valves or Remote Control Valves, installing
and 4 o'clock positions (upper ? of the pipe) computerized monitoring and leak detection
with a depth greater than 6% of the pipeline systems, replacing pipe segments with pipe of
diameter (greater than 0.50 inches in depth for heavier wall thickness, providing additional
a pipeline diameter less than Nominal Pipe Size training to personnel on response procedures,
114
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
conducting drills with local emergency re- (2) Outside force damage. If an operator
sponders and implementing additional inspec- determines that outside force (e.g., earth
tion and maintenance programs. movement, floods, unstable suspension bridge)
(b) Third party damage and outside is a threat to the integrity of a covered segment,
force damage— (1) Third party damage. the operator must take measures to minimize
An operator must enhance its damage preven- the consequences to the covered segment from
tion program, as required under §192.614 of outside force damage. These measures include,
this part, with respect to a covered segment to but are not limited to, increasing the frequency
prevent and minimize the consequences of a of aerial, foot or other methods of patrols,
release due to third party damage. Enhanced adding external protection, reducing external
measures to an existing damage prevention stress, and relocating the line.
program include, at a minimum— (c) Automatic shut-off valves (ASV) or
(i) Using qualified personnel (see Remote control valves (RCV). If an operator
§192.915) for work an operator is conducting determines, based on a risk analysis, that an
that could adversely affect the integrity of a ASV or RCV would be an efficient means of
covered segment, such as marking, locating, adding protection to a high consequence area
and direct supervision of known excavation in the event of a gas release, an operator must
work. install the ASV or RCV. In making that deter-
(ii) Collecting in a central database infor- mination, an operator must, at least, consider
mation that is location specific on excavation the following factors—swiftness of leak detec-
damage that occurs in covered and non cov- tion and pipe shutdown capabilities, the type of
ered segments in the transmission system and gas being transported, operating pressure, the
the root cause analysis to support identification rate of potential release, pipeline profile, the
of targeted additional preventative and mitiga- potential for ignition, and location of nearest
tive measures in the high consequence areas. response personnel.
This information must include recognized dam- (d) Pipelines operating below 30%
age that is not required to be reported as an SMYS. An operator of a transmission pipeline
incident under part 191. operating below 30% SMYS located in a high
(iii) Participating in one-call systems in lo- consequence area must follow the requirements
cations where covered segments are present. in paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section.
(iv) Monitoring of excavations conducted An operator of a transmission pipeline operat-
on covered pipeline segments by pipeline per- ing below 30% SMYS located in a Class 3 or
sonnel. If an operator finds physical evidence Class 4 area but not in a high consequence
of encroachment involving excavation that the area must follow the requirements in para-
operator did not monitor near a covered seg- graphs (d)(1), (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section.
ment, an operator must either excavate the (1) Apply the requirements in paragraphs
area near the encroachment or conduct an (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(iii) of this section to the
above ground survey using methods defined in pipeline; and
NACE RP-0502-2002 (ibr, see §192.7). An (2) Either monitor excavations near the
operator must excavate, and remediate, in ac- pipeline, or conduct patrols as required by
cordance with ANSI/ASME B31.8S and §192.705 of the pipeline at bi-monthly inter-
§192.933 any indication of coating holidays or vals. If an operator finds any indication of un-
discontinuity warranting direct examination. reported construction activity, the operator
115
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
must conduct a follow up investigation to de- ment. The periodic evaluation must be based
termine if mechanical damage has occurred. on a data integration and risk assessment of the
(3) Perform semi-annual leak surveys entire pipeline as specified in §192.917. For
(quarterly for unprotected pipelines or cathodi- plastic transmission pipelines, the periodic
cally protected pipe where electrical surveys evaluation is based on the threat analysis speci-
are impractical). fied in 192.917(d). For all other transmission
(e) Plastic transmission pipeline. An op- pipelines, the evaluation must consider the past
erator of a plastic transmission pipeline must and present integrity assessment results, data
apply the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(i), integration and risk assessment information
(b)(1)(iii) and (b)(1)(iv) of this section to the (§192.917), and decisions about remediation
covered segments of the pipeline. (§192.933) and additional preventive and miti-
gative actions (§192.935). An operator must
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, use the results from this evaluation to identify
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR the threats specific to each covered segment
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, and the risk represented by these threats.
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] (c) Assessment methods. In conducting
the integrity reassessment, an operator must
assess the integrity of the line pipe in the cov-
§192.937 What is a continual process of ered segment by any of the following methods
evaluation and assessment to maintain a as appropriate for the threats to which the cov-
pipeline's integrity? ered segment is susceptible (see §192.917), or
by confirmatory direct assessment under the
(a) General. After completing the baseline conditions specified in §192.931.
integrity assessment of a covered segment, an (1) Internal inspection tool or tools capable
operator must continue to assess the line pipe of detecting corrosion, and any other threats to
of that segment at the intervals specified in which the covered segment is susceptible. An
§192.939 and periodically evaluate the integ- operator must follow ASME/ANSI B31.8S
rity of each covered pipeline segment as pro- (ibr, see §192.7), section 6.2 in selecting the
vided in paragraph (b) of this section. An op- appropriate internal inspection tools for the
erator must reassess a covered segment on covered segment.
which a prior assessment is credited as a base- (2) Pressure test conducted in accordance
line under §192.921(e) by no later than De- with subpart J of this part. An operator must
cember 17, 2009. An operator must reassess a use the test pressures specified in Table 3 of
covered segment on which a baseline assess- section 5 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S, to justify
ment is conducted during the baseline period an extended reassessment interval in accor-
specified in §192.921(d) by no later than seven dance with §192.939.
years after the baseline assessment of that cov- (3) Direct assessment to address threats of
ered segment unless the evaluation under para- external corrosion, internal corrosion, or stress
graph (b) of this section indicates earlier reas- corrosion cracking. An operator must conduct
sessment. the direct assessment in accordance with the
(b) Evaluation. An operator must conduct requirements listed in §192.923 and with as
a periodic evaluation as frequently as needed applicable, the requirements specified in
to assure the integrity of each covered seg- §§ 192.925, 192.927 or 192.929;
116
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(4) Other technology that an operator sessment at the interval the operator has estab-
demonstrates can provide an equivalent under- lished. A reassessment carried out using con-
standing of the condition of the line pipe. An firmatory direct assessment must be done in
operator choosing this option must notify the accordance with §192.931. The table that fol-
Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) 180 days be- lows this section sets forth the maximum al-
fore conducting the assessment, in accordance lowed reassessment intervals.
with §192.949. An operator must also notify a (1) Pressure test or internal inspection
State or local pipeline safety authority when or other equivalent technology. An operator
either a covered segment is located in a State that uses pressure testing or internal inspection
where OPS has an interstate agent agreement, as an assessment method must establish the
or an intrastate covered segment is regulated reassessment interval for a covered pipeline
by that State. segment by—
(5) Confirmatory direct assessment when (i) Basing the interval on the identified
used on a covered segment that is scheduled threats for the covered segment (see
for reassessment at a period longer than seven §192.917) and on the analysis of the results
years. An operator using this reassessment from the last integrity assessment and from the
method must comply with §192.931. data integration and risk assessment required
by §192.917; or
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, (ii) Using the intervals specified for different
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR stress levels of pipeline (operating at or above
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 30% SMYS) listed in ASME/ANSI B31.8S,
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] section 5, Table 3.
(2) External Corrosion Direct Assess-
ment. An operator that uses ECDA that meets
§192.939 What are the required reas- the requirements of this subpart must determine
sessment intervals? the reassessment interval according to the re-
quirements in paragraphs 6.2 and 6.3 of
An operator must comply with the follow- NACE RP0502-2002 (ibr, see §192.7).
ing requirements in establishing the reassess- (3) Internal Corrosion or SCC Direct
ment interval for the operator's covered pipe- Assessment. An operator that uses ICDA or
line segments. SCCDA in accordance with the requirements
(a) Pipelines operating at or above 30% of this subpart must determine the reassess-
SMYS. An operator must establish a reassess- ment interval according to the following
ment interval for each covered segment operat- method. However, the reassessment interval
ing at or above 30% SMYS in accordance cannot exceed those specified for direct as-
with the requirements of this section. The sessment in ASME/ANSI B31.8S, section 5,
maximum reassessment interval by an allow- Table 3.
able reassessment method is seven years. If an (i) Determine the largest defect most likely
operator establishes a reassessment interval to remain in the covered segment and the cor-
that is greater than seven years, the operator rosion rate appropriate for the pipe, soil and
must, within the seven-year period, conduct a protection conditions;
confirmatory direct assessment on the covered
segment, and then conduct the follow-up reas-
117
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(ii) Use the largest remaining defect as the through (b)(3) of this section by year 20 of the
size of the largest defect discovered in the interval.
SCC or ICDA segment; and The following table sets forth the maximum
(iii) Estimate the reassessment interval as reassessment intervals. Also refer to Appendix
half the time required for the largest defect to E.II for guidance on Assessment Methods and
grow to a critical size. Assessment Schedule for Transmission Pipe-
(b) Pipelines Operating Below 30% lines Operating Below 30% SMYS. In case of
SMYS. An operator must establish a reassess- conflict between the rule and the guidance in
ment interval for each covered segment operat- the Appendix, the requirements of the rule con-
ing below 30% SMYS in accordance with the trol. An operator must comply with the follow-
requirements of this section. The maximum re- ing requirements in establishing a reassessment
assessment interval by an allowable reassess- interval for a covered segment:
ment method is seven years. An operator must (6) An operator must comply with the fol-
establish reassessment by at least one of the lowing requirements in establishing a reassess-
following— ment interval for a covered segment:
(1) Reassessment by pressure test, internal
inspection or other equivalent technology fol-
lowing the requirements in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section except that the stress level refer-
enced in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section
would be adjusted to reflect the lower operat-
ing stress level. If an established interval is
more than seven years, the operator must con-
duct by the seventh year of the interval either a
confirmatory direct assessment in accordance
with §192.931, or a low stress reassessment in
accordance with §192.941.
(2) Reassessment by ECDA following the
requirements in paragraph (a)(2) of this sec-
tion.
(3) Reassessment by ICDA or SCCDA
following the requirements in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section.
(4) Reassessment by confirmatory direct
assessment at 7-year intervals in accordance
with §192.931, with reassessment by one of
the methods listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(b)(3) of this section by year 20 of the interval.
(5) Reassessment by the low stress as-
sessment method at 7-year intervals in accor-
dance with §192.941 with reassessment by
one of the methods listed in paragraphs (b)(1)
118
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(*) A Confirmatory direct assessment as described in '192.931 must be conducted by year 7 in a 10-year interval
and years 7 and 14 of a 15-year interval.
(**) A low stress reassessment or Confirmatory direct assessment must be conducted by years 7 and 14 of the in-
terval.
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR 2307, December
22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
§192.941 What is a low stress reassess- an operator must perform an electrical survey (i.e.
ment? indirect examination tool/method) at least every 7
years on the covered segment. An operator must
(a) General. An operator of a transmission use the results of each survey as part of an overall
line that operates below 30% SMYS may use evaluation of the cathodic protection and corro-
the following method to reassess a covered sion threat for the covered segment. This evalua-
segment in accordance with §192.939. This tion must consider, at minimum, the leak repair
method of reassessment addresses the threats and inspection records, corrosion monitoring re-
of external and internal corrosion. The operator cords, exposed pipe inspection records, and the
must have conducted a baseline assessment of pipeline environment.
the covered segment in accordance with the (2) Unprotected pipe or cathodically pro-
requirements of §§ 192.919 and 192.921. tected pipe where electrical surveys are im-
(b) External corrosion. An operator must practical. If an electrical survey is impractical on
take one of the following actions to address the covered segment an operator must—
external corrosion on the low stress covered (i) Conduct leakage surveys as required by
segment. §192.706 at 4-month intervals; and
(1) Cathodically protected pipe. To ad- (ii) Every 18 months, identify and remediate
dress the threat of external corrosion on ca- areas of active corrosion by evaluating leak repair
thodically protected pipe in a covered segment, and inspection records, corrosion monitoring re-
119
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
cords, exposed pipe inspection records, and nal inspection tools within the required reassess-
the pipeline environment. ment period and that the actions the operator is
(c) Internal corrosion. To address the taking in the interim ensure the integrity of the
threat of internal corrosion on a covered seg- covered segment.
ment, an operator must— (2) Maintain product supply. An operator
(1) Conduct a gas analysis for corrosive may be able to justify a longer reassessment pe-
agents at least once each calendar year; riod for a covered segment if the operator dem-
(2) Conduct periodic testing of fluids re- onstrates that it cannot maintain local product
moved from the segment. At least once each supply if it conducts the reassessment within the
calendar year test the fluids removed from each required interval.
storage field that may affect a covered segment; (b) How to apply. If one of the conditions
and specified in paragraph (a) (1) or (a) (2) of this
(3) At least every seven (7) years, integrate section applies, an operator may seek a waiver of
data from the analysis and testing required by the required reassessment interval. An operator
paragraphs (c)(1)-(c)(2) with applicable internal must apply for a waiver in accordance with 49
corrosion leak records, incident reports, safety- U.S.C. 60118(c), at least 180 days before the
related condition reports, repair records, patrol end of the required reassessment interval, unless
records, exposed pipe reports, and test re- local product supply issues make the period im-
cords, and define and implement appropriate practical. If local product supply issues make the
remediation actions. period impractical, an operator must apply for the
waiver as soon as the need for the waiver be-
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, comes known.
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 69
FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
§192.943 When can an operator deviate
from these reassessment intervals?
§192.945 What methods must an
(a) Waiver from reassessment interval in operator use to measure program
limited situations. In the following limited in- effectiveness?
stances, OPS may allow a waiver from a reas-
sessment interval required by §192.939 if OPS (a) General. An operator must include in its
finds a waiver would not be inconsistent with integrity management program methods to meas-
pipeline safety. ure, on a semi-annual basis, whether the program
(1) Lack of internal inspection tools. An is effective in assessing and evaluating the integrity
operator who uses internal inspection as an as- of each covered pipeline segment and in protect-
sessment method may be able to justify a longer ing the high consequence areas. These measures
reassessment period for a covered segment if must include the four overall performance meas-
internal inspection tools are not available to as- ures specified in ASME/ANSI B31.8S (ibr, see
sess the line pipe. To justify this, the operator §192.7), section 9.4, and the specific measures
must demonstrate that it cannot obtain the inter- for each identified threat specified in
120
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
ASME/ANSI B31.8S, Appendix A. An opera- implement and evaluate each element of the base-
tor must submit the four overall performance line assessment plan and integrity management
measures, by electronic or other means, on a program. Documents include those developed
semi-annual frequency to OPS in accordance and used in support of any identification, calcula-
with §192.951. An operator must submit its tion, amendment, modification, justification, de-
first report on overall performance measures by viation and determination made, and any action
August 31, 2004. Thereafter, the performance taken to implement and evaluate any of the pro-
measures must be complete through June 30 gram elements;
and December 31 of each year and must be (e) Documents that demonstrate personnel
submitted within 2 months after those dates. have the required training, including a description
(b) External Corrosion Direct assess- of the training program, in accordance with
ment. In addition to the general requirements §192.915;
for performance measures in paragraph (a) of (f) Schedule required by §192.933 that pri-
this section, an operator using direct assessment oritizes the conditions found during an assessment
to assess the external corrosion threat must de- for evaluation and remediation, including technical
fine and monitor measures to determine the ef- justifications for the schedule.
fectiveness of the ECDA process. These meas- (g) Documents to carry out the requirements
ures must meet the requirements of §192.925. in §§ 192.923 through 192.929 for a direct as-
sessment plan;
[Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15, (h) Documents to carry out the requirements
2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR in §192.931 for confirmatory direct assessment;
2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, (i) Verification that an operator has provided
69 FR 18227, April 6, 2004] any documentation or notification required by this
subpart to be provided to OPS, and when appli-
cable, a State authority with which OPS has an
§192.947 What records must an operator interstate agent agreement, and a State or local
keep? pipeline safety authority that regulates a covered
pipeline segment within that State.
An operator must maintain, for the useful
life of the pipeline, records that demonstrate [Amdt. 192-95, 68 FR 69777, December 15,
compliance with the requirements of this sub- 2003 as amended by Amdt. 192 95A, 69 FR
part. At minimum, an operator must maintain 2307, December 22, 2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 69
the following records for review during an in- FR 18227, April 6, 2004]
spection.
(a) A written integrity management program
in accordance with §192.907; §192.949 How does an operator notify OPS?
(b) Documents supporting the threat identi-
fication and risk assessment in accordance with An operator must provide any notification
§192.917; required by this subpart by—
(c) A written baseline assessment plan in (1) Sending the notification to the Information
accordance with §192.919; Resources Manager, Office of Pipeline Safety,
(d) Documents to support any decision, Research and Special Programs Administration,
analysis and process developed and used to U.S. Department of Transportation, Room 7128,
121
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590;
(2) Sending the notification to the Informa-
tion Resources Manager by facsimile to (202)
366-7128; or
(3) Entering the information directly on the
Integrity Management Database (IMDB) Web
site at http://primis.RSPA.dot.gov/gasimp/.
122
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Appendix A–[Reserved] ASTM A 106—Steel pipe, “Standard Speci-
fication for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High
[Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970, as amended temperature Service” (ibr, see §192.7)
by Amdt. 192-3, 35 FR 17659, Nov. 17, ASTM A 333/A 333M—Steel pipe, “Stan-
1970; Amdt. 192-12, 38 FR 4760, Feb. 22, dard Specification for Seamless and Welded steel
1973; Amdt. 192-17, 40 FR 6345, Feb. 11, Pipe for Low Temperature Service” (ibr, see
1975; Amdt. 192-17C, 40 FR 8188, Feb. 26, §192.7)
1975; Amdt. 192-18, 40 FR 10181, Mar. 5, ASTM A 381—Steel pipe, “Standard speci-
1975; Amdt. 192-19, 40 FR 10471, Mar. 6, fication for Metal-Arc-Welded Steel Pipe for Use
1975; Amdt. 192-22, 41 FR 13589, Mar. 31, with High-Pressure Transmission Systems” (ibr,
1976; Amdt. 192-32, 43 FR 18553, May 1, see §192.7)
1978; Amdt. 192-34, 44 FR 42968, July 23, ASTM A 671—Steel pipe, “Standard Speci-
1979; Amdt. 192-37, 46 FR 10157, Feb. 2, fication for Electric-Fusion-Welded Pipe for At-
1981; Amdt. 192-41, 47 FR 41381, Sept. 20, mospheric and Lower Temperatures” (ibr, see
1982; Amdt. 192-42, 47 FR 44263, Oct. 7, §192.7)
1982; Amdt 192-51, 51 FR 15333, Apr. 23, ASTM A 672—Steel pipe, “Standard Speci-
1986; Amdt. 192-61, 53 FR 36793, Sept. 22, fication for Electric-Fusion-Welded Steel Pipe for
1988; Amdt. 192-62, 54 FR 5625, Feb. 6, High-Pressure Service at Moderate Tempera-
1989; Amdt. 192-64, 54 FR 27881, July 3, tures” (ibr, see §192.7)
1989; Amdt. 192-65, 54 FR 32344, Aug. 7, ASTM A 691—Steel pipe, “Standard Speci-
1989; Amdt. 192-68, 58 FR 14519, Mar. 18, fication for Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe, Electric-
1993; Amdt. 192-76, 61 FR 26121, May 24, Fusion-Welded for High Pressure Service at High
1996; Amdt. 192-78, 61 FR 28770, June 6, Temperatures” (ibr, see §192.7)
1996; Amdt. 192-78C, 61 FR 41019, Aug. 7, ASTM D 2513-1999 “Thermoplastic pipe
1996; Amdt. 192-84, 63 FR 7721, Feb. 17, and tubing, “Standard Specification for Thermo-
1998; Amdt. 192-84A, 63 FR 38757, July 20, plastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings”
1998; Amdt. 192-95, 16 FR 69778, Dec. 15, (ibr, see §192.7)
2003; Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227, April 6, ASTM D 2517—Thermosetting plastic pipe
2004; Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, and tubing, “Standard Specification Reinforced
2004] Epoxy Resin Gas Pressure Pipe and Fittings” (ibr,
see §192.7)
API 5L—Steel pipe, “API Specification for A. Bending properties. For pipe 2 inches
Line Pipe” (ibr, see §192.7) (51 millimeters) or less in diameter, a length of
ASTM A 53/A53M-99b—Steel pipe, pipe must be cold bent through at least 90 de-
“Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel Black grees around a cylindrical mandrel that has a di-
and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, welded and ameter 12 times the diameter of the pipe, without
Seamless”(ibr, see §192.7) developing cracks at any portion and without
opening the longitudinal weld.
123
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
For pipe more than 2 inches (51 millime- set forth in API Specification 5L (ibr, see
ters) in diameter, the pipe must meet the re- §192.7).
quirements of the flattening tests set forth in
ASTM A53, except that the number of tests III. Steel pipe manufactured before No-
must be at least equal to the minimum required vember 12, 1970, to earlier editions of listed
in paragraph II-D of this appendix to determine specifications. Steel pipe manufactured before
yield strength. November 12, 1970, in accordance with a speci-
fication of which a later edition is listed in section I
B. Weldability. A girth weld must be of this appendix, is qualified for use under this
made in the pipe by a welder who is qualified part if the following requirements are met:
under subpart E of this part. The weld must be
made under the most severe conditions under A. Inspection. The pipe must be clean
which welding will be allowed in the field and enough to permit adequate inspection. It must be
by means of the same procedure that will be visually inspected to ensure that it is reasonably
used in the field. On pipe more than 4 inches round and straight and that there are no defects
(102 millimeters) in diameter, at least one test which might impair the strength or tightness of the
weld must be made for each 100 lengths of pipe.
pipe. On pipe 4 inches (102 millimeters) or less
in diameter, at least one test weld must be made B. Similarity of specification require-
for each 400 lengths of pipe. The weld must be ments. The edition of the listed specification un-
tested in accordance with API Standard 1104 der which the pipe was manufactured must have
(ibr, see §192.7). If the requirements of API substantially the same requirements with respect
Standard 1104 cannot be met, weldability may to the following properties as a later edition of
be established by making chemical tests for car- that specification listed in section I of this appen-
bon and manganese, and proceeding in accor- dix:
dance with section IX of the ASME Boiler and (1) Physical (mechanical) properties of pipe,
Pressure Vessel Code (ibr, see §192.7). The including yield and tensile strength, elongation,
same number of chemical tests must be made as and yield to tensile ratio, and testing requirements
are required for testing a girth weld. to verify those properties.
(2) Chemical properties of pipe and testing
C. Inspection. The pipe must be clean requirements to verify those properties.
enough to permit adequate inspection. It must
be visually inspected to ensure that it is rea- C. Inspection or test of welded pipe. On
sonably round and straight and there are no de- pipe with welded seams, one of the following re-
fects which might impair the strength or tight- quirements must be met:
ness of the pipe. (1) The edition of the listed specification to
which the pipe was manufactured must have sub-
D. Tensile properties. If the tensile prop- stantially the same requirements with respect to
erties of the pipe are not known, the minimum nondestructive inspection of welded seams and
yield strength may be taken as 24,000 p.s.i. the standards for acceptance or rejection and re-
(165 MPa) or less, or the tensile properties pair as a later edition of the specification listed in
may be established by performing tensile test as section I of this appendix.
124
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
(2) The pipe must be tested in accordance
with Subpart J of this part to at least 1.25 times
the maximum allowable operating pressure if it
is to be installed in a class 1 location and to at
least 1.5 times the maximum allowable operat-
ing pressure if it is to be installed in a class 2, 3,
or 4 location. Notwithstanding any shorter time
period permitted under Subpart J of this part,
the test pressure must be maintained for at least
8 hours.
125
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Appendix C–Qualification of center, are cut from steel service line and tested
Welders for Low Stress Level Pipe as follows:
(1) One sample is centered in a guided bend
I. Basic test. The test is made on pipe 12 testing machine and bent to the contour of the die
inches (305 millimeters) or less in diameter. for a distance of 2 inches (51 millimeters) on each
The test weld must be made with the pipe in a side of the weld. If the sample shows any breaks
horizontal fixed position so that the test weld or cracks after removal from the bending ma-
includes at least one section of overhead posi- chine, it is unacceptable.
tion welding. The beveling, root opening, and (2) The ends of the second sample are flat-
other details must conform to the specifications tened and the entire joint subjected to a tensile
of the procedure under which the welder is be- strength test. If failure occurs adjacent to or in
ing qualified. Upon completion, the test weld is the weld metal, the weld is unacceptable. If a
cut into four coupons and subjected to a root tensile strength testing machine is not available,
bend test. If, as a result of this test, two or this sample must also pass the bending test pre-
more of the four coupons develop a crack in scribed in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph.
the weld material, or between the weld material
and base metal, that is more than 1/8-inch (3.2 [Part 192 - Org., Aug. 19, 1970 as amended by
millimeters) long in any direction, the weld is Amdt. 192-85, 63 FR 37500, July 13, 1998;
unacceptable. Cracks that occur on the corner Amdt. 192-94, 69 FR 32886, June 14, 2004]
of the specimen during testing are not consid-
ered. A welder who successfully passes a butt-
weld qualification test under this section shall be Appendix D–Criteria for Cathodic Protection
qualified to weld on all pipe diameters less than and Determination of Measurements
or equal to 12 inches.
I. Criteria for cathodic protection–
II. Additional tests for welders of ser- A. Steel, cast iron, and ductile iron struc-
vice line connections to mains. A service line tures.
connection fitting is welded to a pipe section (1) A negative (cathodic) voltage of at least
with the same diameter as a typical main. The 0.85 volt, with reference to a saturated copper-
weld is made in the same position as it is made copper sulfate half cell. Determination of this
in the field. The weld is unacceptable if it shows voltage must be made with the protective current
a serious undercutting or if it has rolled edges. applied, and in accordance with sections II and
The weld is tested by attempting to break the IV of this appendix.
fitting off the run pipe. The weld is unacceptable (2) A negative (cathodic) voltage shift of at
if it breaks and shows incomplete fusion, over- least 300 millivolts. Determination of this voltage
lap, or poor penetration at the junction of the shift must be made with the protective current
fitting and run pipe. applied, and in accordance with sections II and
IV of this appendix. This criterion of voltage shift
III. Periodic tests for welders of small applies to structures not in contact with metals of
service lines. Two samples of the welder's different anodic potentials.
work, each about 8 inches (203 millimeters) (3) A minimum negative (cathodic) polariza-
long with the weld located approximately in the tion voltage shift of 100 millivolts. This polariza-
126
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
tion voltage shift must be determined in accor- the pH at the metal surface, careful investigation
dance with sections III and IV of this appendix. or testing must be made before applying cathodic
(4) A voltage at least as negative (cathodic) protection to stop pitting attack on aluminum
as that originally established at the beginning of structures in environments with a natural pH in
the Tafel segment of the E-log-I curve. This excess of 8.
voltage must be measured in accordance with
section IV of this appendix. C. Copper structures. A minimum negative
(5) A net protective current from the elec- (cathodic) polarization voltage shift of 100 mil-
trolyte into the structure surface as measured by livolts. This polarization voltage shift must be de-
an earth current technique applied at predeter- termined in accordance with sections III and IV
mined current discharge (anodic) points of the of this appendix.
structure.
D. Metals of different anodic potentials. A
B. Aluminum structures. negative (cathodic) voltage, measured in accor-
(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (3) dance with section IV of this appendix, equal to
and (4) of this paragraph, a minimum negative that required for the most anodic metal in the sys-
(cathodic) voltage shift of 150 millivolts, pro- tem must be maintained. If amphoteric structures
duced by the application of protective current. are involved that could be damaged by high alka-
The voltage shift must be determined in accor- linity covered by paragraphs (3) and (4) of para-
dance with sections II and IV of this appendix. graph B of this section, they must be electrically
(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (3) isolated with insulating flanges, or the equivalent.
and (4) of this paragraph, a minimum negative
(cathodic) polarization voltage shift of 100 mil- II. Interpretation of voltage measure-
livolts. This polarization voltage shift must be ment. Voltage (IR) drops other than those
determined in accordance with sections III and across the structure electrolyte boundary must be
IV of this appendix. considered for valid interpretation of the voltage
(3) Notwithstanding the alternative mini- measurement in paragraphs A(1) and (2) and
mum criteria in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this paragraph B(1) of section I of the appendix.
paragraph, aluminum, if cathodically protected
at voltages in excess of 1.20 volts as measured III. Determination of polarization voltage
with reference to a copper-copper sulfate half shift. The polarization voltage shift must be de-
cell, in accordance with section IV of this ap- termined by interrupting the protective current and
pendix, and compensated for the voltage (IR) measuring the polarization decay. When the cur-
drops other than those across the structure- rent is initially interrupted, an immediate voltage
electrolyte boundary may suffer corrosion re- shift occurs. The voltage reading after the imme-
sulting from the build-up of alkali on the metal diate shift must be used as the base reading from
surface. A voltage in excess of 1.20 volts may which to measure polarization decay in para-
not be used unless previous test results indicate graphs A(3), B(2), and C of section I of this ap-
no appreciable corrosion will occur in the par- pendix.
ticular environment.
(4) Since aluminum may suffer from corro- IV. Reference half cells.
sion under high pH conditions, and since appli-
cation of cathodic protection tends to increase
127
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
A. Except as provided in paragraphs B
and C of this section, negative (cathodic) volt-
age must be measured between the structure
surface and a saturated copper-copper sulfate
half cell contacting the electrolyte.
128
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Appendix E to Part 192—Guidance on De- use method (1) or (2) from the definition in
termining High Consequence Areas and on §192.903 to identify a high consequence area. An
Carrying Out Requirements in the Integ- operator may apply one method to its entire pipe-
rity Management Rule line system, or an operator may apply one
method to individual portions of the pipeline sys-
I. Guidance on Determining a High Conse- tem. (Refer to figure E.I.A for a diagram of a high
quence Area consequence area)
To determine which segments of an opera- [Amdt. 192-95, 16 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003,
tor's transmission pipeline system are covered as amended by Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227,
for purposes of the integrity management pro- April 6, 2004; Amdt. 192-95C, 69 FR 29903,
gram requirements, an operator must identify May 26, 2004]
the high consequence areas. An operator must
School
PIR PIR
ABC Pipeline
HCA
Figure E.I.A
II. Guidance on Assessment Methods and (b) Table E.II.2 gives guidance to help an
Additional Preventive and Mitigative operator implement requirements on assessment
Measures for Transmission Pipelines methods for addressing time dependent and
independent threats for a transmission pipeline
(a) Table E.II.1 gives guidance to help an in an HCA.
operator implement requirements on additional (c) Table E.II.3 gives guidance on preven-
preventive and mitigative measures for address- tative & mitigative measures addressing time
ing time dependent and independent threats for dependent and independent threats for trans-
a transmission pipeline operating below 30% mission pipelines that operate below 30%
SMYS not in an HCA (i.e. outside of potential SMYS, in HCAs.
impact circle) but located within a Class 3 or
Class 4 Location.
129
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
[Amdt. 192-95, 16 FR 69778, Dec. 15, 2003, April 6, 2004]
as amended by Amdt. 192-95B, 69 FR 18227,
Table E.II.1: Assessment Methods for Transmission Pipeline s Operating Below 30% SMYS
not in HCAs but in Class 3 and 4 Locations
(Column 1) (Column 4)
Primary Secondary
External 455-(Gen. Post 1971), 603-(Gen Oper=n) For Cathodically Protected Transmission Pipe-
Corrosion 457-(Gen. Pre-1971) 613-(Surveillance) line:
459-(Examination),
461-(Ext. coating) $ Perform semi-annual leak surveys.
463-(CP),
465-(Monitoring) For Unprotected Transmission Pipelines or for
467-(Elect isolation), Cathodically Protected Pipe where Electrical
469-Test stations) Surveys are Impractical:
471-(Test leads),
473-(Interference) $ Perform quarterly leak surveys
479-(Atmospheric),
481-(Atmospheric)
485-(Remedial),
705-(Patrol)
706-(Leak survey),
711 (Repair B gen.)
717-(Repair B perm.)
Internal 475-(Gen IC), 53(a)-(Materials) $ Perform semi-annual leak surveys.
Corrosion 477-(IC monitoring) 603-(Gen Oper=n)
485-(Remedial), 613-(Surveillance)
705-(Patrol)
706-(Leak survey),
711 (Repair B gen.)
717-(Repair B perm.)
3rd Party 103-(Gen. Design), 615B(Emerg. Plan) $ Participation in state one-call system,
Damage 111-(Design factor)
317-(Hazard prot), $ Use of qualified operator employees and
327-(Cover) contractors to perform marking and locating of
614-(Dam. Prevent), buried structures and in direct supervision of
616-(Public education) excavation work, AND
705-(Patrol),
707-(Line markers) $ Either monitoring of excavations near opera-
711 (Repair B gen.), tor=s transmission pipelines, or bi-monthly patrol
717-(Repair B perm.) of transmission pipelines in class 3 and 4 loca-
tions. Any indications of unreported construc-
tion activity would require a follow up investiga-
tion to determine if mechanical damage occurred.
130
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
131
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Table E.II.2 Assessment Requirements for Transmission Pipelines in HCAs (Re-assessment intervals are maximum allowed)
Re-Assessment Requirements (see Note 3)
At or above 30% SMYS
At or above 50% SMYS Below 30% SMYS
up to 50% SMYS
Max Max Max
Baseline Assessment
Re-Assessment Assessment Method Re-Assessment Assessment Method Re-Assessment Assessment Method
Method (see Note 3)
Interval Interval Interval
7 CDA 7 CDA
10 Pressure Test or ILI or DA Preventative & Mitigative (P&M)
Ongoing
Pressure Test or ILI or Measures
15(see Note 1) (see Table E.II.3), (see Note 2)
Pressure Testing DA (see Note 1)
Repeat inspection cycle
20
every 10 years Repeat inspection cycle Pressure Test or ILI or DA
every 15 years
Repeat inspection cycle every 20 years
7 CDA 7 CDA
10 ILI or DA or Pressure Test Preventative & Mitigative (P&M)
Ongoing
ILI or DA or Pressure Measures
In-Line Inspection 15(see Note 1) (see Table E.II.3), (see Note 2)
est (see Note 1)
Repeat inspection cycle
20
every 10 years Repeat inspection cycle ILI or DA or Pressure Test
every 15 years
Repeat inspection cycle every 20 years
7 CDA 7 CDA
10 DA or ILI or Pressure Test Ongoing Preventative & Mitigative (P&M)
DA or ILI or Pressure Measures
15(see Note 1) (see Table E.II.3), (see Note 2)
Direct Assessment Test (see Note 1)
Repeat inspection cycle
20
every 10 years Repeat inspection cycle DA or ILI or Pressure Test
every 15 years
Repeat inspection cycle every 20 years
Note 1: Operator may choose to utilize CDA at year 14, then utilize ILI, Pressure Test, or DA at year 15 as allowed under ASME B31.8S
Note 2: Operator may choose to utilize CDA at year 7 and 14 in lieu of P&M
Note 3: Operator may utilize “other technology that an operator demonstrates can provide an equivalent understanding of the condition of line pipe”
132
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98
PART 192 – TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY
PIPELINE: MINIMUM FEDERAL SAFETY STANDARDS
Table E.II.3 Preventative & Mitigative Measures addressing Time Dependent and
Independent Threats for Transmission Pipelines that Operate Below 30% SMYS , in HCAs
Existing 192 Requirements Additional (to 192 requirements) Preventive & Mitiga-
Threat
Primary Secondary tive Measures
603-(Gen Oper) For Cathodically Protected Trmn. Pipelines
455-(Gen. Post 1971) 613-(Surveil) $ Perform an electrical survey (i.e. indirect examina-
457-(Gen. Pre-1971) tion tool/method) at least every 7 years. Results are to
459-(Examination) be utilized as part of an overall evaluation of the CP sys-
461-(Ext. coating) tem and corrosion threat for the covered segment.
463-(CP) Evaluation shall include consideration of leak repair and
465-(Monitoring) inspection records, corrosion monitoring records, ex-
467-(Elect isolation) posed pipe inspection records, and the pipeline envi-
External 469-Test stations) ronment.
Corrosion 471-(Test leads)
473-(Interference) For Unprotected Trmn. Pipelines or for Cathodically
479-(Atmospheric) Protected Pipe where Electrical Surveys are Impractica-
481-(Atmospheric) ble
485-(Remedial) ? Conduct quarterly leak surveys AND
705-(Patrol) ? Every 1½ years, determine areas of active corrosion
706-(Leak survey) by evaluation of leak repair and inspection records, cor-
711 (Repair B gen.) rosion monitoring records, exposed pipe inspection re-
717-(Repair B perm.) cords, and the pipeline environment.
475-(Gen IC) 53(a)-(Materials) ? Obtain and review gas analysis data each calendar
477-(IC monitoring) 603-(Gen Oper) year for corrosive agents from transmission pipelines in
485-(Remedial) 613-(Surveil) HCAs,
705-(Patrol) ? Periodic testing of fluid removed from pipelines.
706-(Leak survey) Specifically, once each calendar year from each storage
Internal
711 (Repair B gen.) field that may affect transmission pipelines in HCAs,
Corrosion
717-(Repair B perm.) AND
? At least every 7 years, integrate data obtained with
applicable internal corrosion leak records, incident re-
ports, safety related condition reports, repair records,
patrol records, exposed pipe reports, and test records.
103-(Gen. Design) 615 B(Emerg Plan) ? Participation in state one-call system,
111-(Design factor)
317-(Hazard prot) ? Use of qualified operator employees and contrac-
327-(Cover) tors to perform marking and locating of buried struc-
614-(Dam. Prevent) tures and in direct supervision of excavation work, AND
3rd Party 616-(Public educat)
Damage 705-(Patrol) ? Either monitoring of excavations near operator=s
707-(Line markers) transmission pipelines, or bi-monthly patrol of transmis-
711 (Repair B gen.) sion pipelines in HCAs or class 3 and 4 locations. Any
717-(Repair B perm.) indications of unreported construction activity would
require a follow up investigation to determine if me-
chanical damage occurred.
133
Revision 8/04 – Current thru 192-98