Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Gerber Graduate diced vegetables (e.g., carrots, green beans, peas) 4.5-ounce jar
$1.78
America's Choice no-salt-added sliced carrots 14.5 ounce can
$0.55
Del Monte no-salt-added cut green beans 8-ounce can $0.89
Del Monte no-salt added peas 17-ounce can $0.60
Gerber Graduate diced fruits (apples, peaches, pears) 4.5 ounce jar $2.24
America's Choice fruit "Lite Fruit Cocktail" 16-ounce can $0.93
Del Monte peaches in pear juice 16-ounce can $0.99
Furthermore, fresh fruits and vegetables are sometimes cheaper and certainly taste better and are more
nutritious than processed products.
REGULATION OF BABY FOOD LABELING
The labels on baby foods are generally subject to the same regulations as regular foods. However,
unlike regular foods, it is impossible for the consumer to estimate amounts of important ingredients by
the foods' appearance, because baby foods are strained, puréed, and blended foods and food
combinations. Thus, consumers must thus rely on the name of the food to make their purchasing
decisions. They may assume that the ingredients emphasized on the label, for example, vegetables and
chicken, are present in larger amounts than they actually are. While labels list ingredients in order of
predominance, they provide only a rough guide as to the actual amounts of the ingredients. Consumers
are certainly not told that chemically modified starch, rice flour, wheat flour, and similar substances
replace the valuable and characterizing ingredient(s).
In 1975, to facilitate informed choices, CSPI petitioned the FDA to require the disclosure of the
percentage of all characterizing ingredients on the front labels of baby foods and to disclose the
percentage of each ingredient on the ingredient label. In 1976, the FDA responded favorably to CSPI's
petition and proposed to institute such requirements. The agency stated:
The Commissioner agrees that most labels currently used on infant and junior foods do not inform the
consumer about the amount of characterizing ingredients(s). The Commissioner also agrees that the
proportion of characterizing ingredient in infant and junior foods, i.e., those ingredients listed in the
name of the food or otherwise featured on the label, may have a material bearing on price and
consumer acceptance. . . . The Commissioner also agrees that there is a potential for deception because
the ingredient(s) listed in the name of infant and junior foods may appear to be present in greater
amounts than is actually the case.
In 1991, after two decades of inaction, the FDA withdrew that proposal as part of a larger effort to
clear its dockets of proposed regulations that had never been finalized.
It is clear that parents still need help in choosing the most healthful foods for their babies. Disclosure
of the characterizing ingredients(s) on the front of the label and percentage-ingredient labeling on the
side or back of the label would give parents the tools. Thus, one product might indicate on the front
label "85 percent bananas," while another might state "50 percent bananas." Some companies would
probably say that such labeling would reveal trade secrets, but the fact is that the only secret today is
from parents--competitors know roughly what each other makes. It is also possible that certain
companies, such as Beech-Nut and Growing Healthy, would favor percentage labeling, because it
would give them a competitive tool. In any case, percentage labeling would encourage companies to
compete on the basis of quality.
[ CSPI U.S. </> ] [ CSPI Documents Library </reports/> ]