THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/14175 SHARE

   

Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets

(2008)

DETAILS

110 pages | 8.5 x 11 | PAPERBACK

ISBN 978-0-309-11742-5 | DOI 10.17226/14175

CONTRIBUTORS

GET THIS BOOK

FIND RELATED TITLES

SUGGESTED CITATION

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2008. Multimodal

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets. Washington, DC: The National
Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/14175.


Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get:

– Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports

– 10% off the price of print titles
– Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests
– Special offers and discounts


Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press.
(Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences.

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets
98
References
1. The Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Trans-
portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing-
ton, DC (2000).
2. TCRP Web-Only Document 6: Transit Capacity and Quality of
Service Manual, Transportation Research Board, National
Research Council, Washington, DC (1999).
3. 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, Florida Department of
Transportation, Office of the State Transportation Planner, Sys-
tems Planning Office, Tallahassee, FL (January 7, 2003).
(http://www11.myflorida.com/planning/systems/sm/los/)
4. Rouphail, N., et al. “Recommended Procedures for Chapter 14,
Bicycles, of the Highway Capacity Manual.” Report FHWA-RD-
98-108. FHWA, U.S. DOT (1998).
5. Rouphail, N., et al. “Recommended Procedures for Chapter 13,
Pedestrians, of the Highway Capacity Manual.” Report FHWA-
RD-98-107. FHWA, U.S. DOT (1999).
6. Fruin, J. Pedestrian Planning and Design. Metropolitan Associa-
tion of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, New
York, NY (1971).
7. Botma, H. “Method to Determine Level of Service for Bicycle
Paths and Pedestrian Bicycle Paths.” Transportation Research
Record 1502, Transportation Research Board, National Research
Council, Washington, DC, pp. 38–44 (1995).
8. Pushkarev, B. and J. Zupan. Public Transportation and Land Use
Policy, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN (1977).
9. Phillips, R., J. Karachepone, and B. Landis. Multi-Modal Qual-
ity of Service Project, Urban and Regional Planning Department,
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (March 2001).
10. Flannery, A., K. Wochinger, and A. Martin. “Driver Assessment
of Service Quality on Urban Streets.” Presented at the Trans-
portation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC
(2005).
11. Flannery, A., et al. “Research Approaches to Assess Automobile
Drivers’ Perception of Quality of Service.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2004).
12. Colman, S. “Assessing Arterial Level of Service for Congestion
Management Programs: A User Perspective,” 1994 ITE Interna-
tional Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers,
Washington, DC (1994).
13. Pecheux, K., et al. “Automobile Drivers’ Perceptions of Service
Quality on Urban Streets.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2004).
Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
14. Science Applications International Corporation, George Mason
University, and Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
“Quality of Service and Customer Satisfaction on Arterial Streets:
Final Report.” FHWA, U.S. DOT, Washington, DC, June 13
(2003).
15. Sutaria, T., and J. Haynes. “Level of Service at Signalized Inter-
sections,” Transportation Research Record 644, Transportation
Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC
(1977).
16. Ha, T.-J., Tae-Jun Ha and W. Berg. “Development of Safety-
Based Level-Of-Service Criteria for Isolated Signalized Intersec-
tions,” Transportation Research Record 1484, Transportation
Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC
(1995).
17. Zhang, L., and P. Prevedouros. “Signalized Intersection LOS that
Accounts for Safety Risk.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2003).
18. Zhang, L., and P. Prevedouros. “Signalized Intersection LOS that
Accounts for User Perceptions.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2004).
19. Zhang, L., and P. Prevedouros. “User Perceptions of Signalized
Intersection Level of Service.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005).
20. Li, J., Z. Yue, and S. Wong. “Performance Evaluation of Signal-
ized Urban Intersections under Mixed Traffic Conditions by
Gray System Theory.” Journal of Transportation Engineering,
Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 113-121 (2004).
21. Pecheux, K., M. Pietrucha, and P. Jovanis. “User Perception of
Level of Service at Signalized Intersections: Methodological
Issues,” Transportation Research Circular E-C018, Fourth Inter-
national Symposium on Highway Capacity, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, DC (June 2000).
22. Fang, C., and K. Pecheux. “Analysis of User Perception of Level
of Service Using Fuzzy Data Mining Technique.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2007).
23. Zhang, L., and P. Prevedouros. “Fuzzy Logic Based User Percep-
tions of Signalized Intersection Level of Service.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2007).
24. Lee, D., T.-G. Kim, and M. Pietrucha. “Incorporation of Trans-
portation User Perception Into Evaluation of Service Quality of
Signalized Intersections Using Fuzzy Aggregation.” Presented
Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets
at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC (2007).
25. Nakamura, H., K. Suzuki, and S. Ryu. “Analysis of the Interrela-
tionship Among Traffic Flow Conditions, Driving Behavior, and
Degree of Driver’s Satisfaction on Rural Motorways,” Trans-
portation Research Circular E-C018, Fourth International Sym-
posium on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board,
Washington, DC (June 2000).
26. Fu, L., F. Saccomanno, and Y.Xin. “A New Performance Index
for Evaluating Transit Quality of Service.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2005).
27. Tumlin, J., et al. “Performance Measures for the Urban Village
Transit Network.” Presented at the Transportation Research
Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005).
28. Xin, Y., L. Fu, and F. Saccomanno. “Assessing Transit Level of
Service along Travel Corridors Using TCQSM – A Case Study.”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meet-
ing, Washington, DC (2005).
29. Furth, P., and T. Muller. “Service Reliability and Hidden Wait-
ing Time: Insights from AVL Data.” Presented at the Transporta-
tion Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2006).
30. Morpace International, Inc., , TCRP Report 47: A Handbook for
Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality, Transporta-
tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington,
DC (1999).
31. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., et al. TCRP Report 88: A Guidebook
for Developing a Transit Performance-Measurement System,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council,
Washington, DC (2003).
32. Perk, V., and C. Foreman, “Evaluation of First-Year Florida
MPO Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Reports,” Report
NCTR-473-02, National Center for Transit Research, University
of South Florida, Tampa, FL (2001).
33. Petritsch, T. “Video Simulation of Roadway Bicycling.” Pre-
sented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC (2007).
34. Zolnik, E., and E. Cromley. “Poisson Multilevel Bicycle Level-
Of-Service Methodology for Road Networks.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2007).
35. Petritsch, T., et al. “Bicycle Level of Service for Arterials.” Pre-
sented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC (2007).
36. Petritsch, T. “Video Simulation of Roadway Bicycling.” Pre-
sented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC (2007).
37. Jensen, S. “Pedestrian and Bicycle Levels of Service on Roadway
Segments.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board
Annual Meeting, Washington DC (2007).
38. Landis, B., et al. “Intersection Level of Service: The Bicycle
Through Movement.” Presented at the Transportation Research
Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2003).
39. Harkey, D., D. Reinfurt, and M. Knuiman. “Development of the
Bicycle Compatibility Index”, Transportation Research Record
1636, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun-
cil, Washington, DC (1998).
40. Landis, B., V. Vattikuti, and M. Brannick. “Real-Time Human
Perceptions: Towards a Bicycle Level of Service,” Transportation
Research Record 1578, Transportation Research Board, National
Research Council, Washington, DC (1997).
Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
99
41. Stinson, M., and C. Bhat. “An Analysis of Commuter Bicyclist
Route Choice Using a Stated Preference Survey.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2003).
42. Jones, E., and T. Carlson. “Development of a Bicycle Compati-
bility Index for Rural Roads in Nebraska.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2003).
43. Noel, N., C. Leclerc, and M. Lee-Gosselin. “CRC Index: Compat-
ibility of Roads for Cyclist in Rural and Urban Fringe Areas.”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meet-
ing, Washington, DC (2003a).
44. Hubbard, S., R. Awwad, and D. Bullock. “New Perspective on
Assessing Impact of Turning Vehicles on Pedestrian Level of Ser-
vice at Signalized Intersections.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2007).
45. Chilukuri, V., and M. Virkler. “Validation of HCM Pedestrian
Delay Model for Interrupted Facilities,” Journal of Transporta-
tion Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp. 939–945 (2005).
46. Clark, Z., S. Hubbard, and D. Bullock. “Quantitative Measure-
ment Procedures for Pedestrian Service at Signalized Intersec-
tions: A Case Study at a Skewed Intersection.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2006).
47. Lee, J., P. Goh, and W. Lam. “New Level-of-Service Standard
for Signalized Crosswalks with Bi-Directional Pedestrian Flows.”
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp.
957–960 (2005).
48. Muraleetharan, T., et al. “Evaluation of Pedestrian Level-of-
Service on Sidewalks and Crosswalks Using Conjoint Analysis.”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meet-
ing, Washington, DC (2004a).
49. Petritsch, T., et al. “Level of Service Model for Signalized Inter-
sections for Pedestrians.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005).
50. Jensen, S. “Pedestrian and Bicycle Levels of Service on Roadway
Segments.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board
Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2007).
51. Bian, Y., et al. “Pedestrian Level of Service for Sidewalks in
China.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual
Meeting, Washington, DC (2007).
52. Byrd, J., and V. Sisiopiku. “Comparison of Level of Service
Methodologies for Pedestrian Sidewalks.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2006).
53. Muraleetharan, T., and T. Hagiwara. “Overall Level of Service of
the Urban Walking Environment and Its Influence on Pedestrian
Route Choice Behavior: Analysis of Pedestrian Travel in Sapporo,
Japan.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual
Meeting, Washington, DC (2007).
54. Hummer, J., et al. “User Perceptions of the Quality of Service on
Shared Paths.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board
Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005).
55. Patten, R., et al. “Shared Use Path Bicycle Level of Service Proce-
dure.” Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual
Meeting, Washington, DC (2005).
56. Petritsch, T., et al. “Pedestrian Level of Service Model for Urban
Arterial Facilities with Sidewalks.” Presented at the Transporta-
tion Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2005).
57. Muraleetharan, T., et al. “Method to Determine Overall Level-
of-Service of Pedestrians on Sidewalks and Crosswalks Based on
Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets
100
Total Utility Value.” Presented at the Transportation Research
Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2004b).
58. Sisiopiku, V., X. Zhang, and M. Virkler. “Pedestrian Level of Ser-
vice and Quality of Operations Assessment Methods.” Presented at
the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2002).
59. Landis, B., et al. “Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment:
Pedestrian LOS,” Transportation Research Record 1773, Trans-
portation Research Board, Washington, DC (2001).
60. Miller, J., J. Bigelow, and N. Garber. “Calibrating Pedestrian
Level-of-Service Metrics with 3-D Visualization.” Transportation
Research Record 1705, TRB, National Research Council,
Washington, DC (2000) pp. 9-15.
61. Chu, X., and M. Baltes. Pedestrian Mid-block Crossing Difficulty,
National Center for Transit Research, University of South
Florida, Tampa, FL (2001).
62. Chu, X., M. Guttenplan, and M. Baltes. “Why People Cross
Where They Do, The Role of the Street Environment.” Presented
at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC (2003).
63. Winters, P. L., and L. E. Tucker. “Searching for Creative
Solutions for Assessing Level of Service Equally Across Modes.”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meet-
ing, Washington, DC (2004).
64. Perone, J., et al. “Assessing Hierarchy of Needs in Levels of Ser-
vice.” FDOT BD 549-1, National Center for Transit Research,
Tampa, FL (2005).
65. Hiatt, R. E. “An Alternative to Auto LOS for Transportation
Impact Analysis.” Presented at the Transportation Research
Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2006).
66. Winters, P., et al. Assessing Level of Service Equally Across Modes,
Center for Urban Transportation Research, College of Engineer-
ing, University of South Florida, Tampa Bay, FL (December
2001).
67. Crider, L., J. Burden, and F. Han. Multimodal LOS: Point Level
of Service Project Final Report, Department of Urban & Regional
Planning, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (August 2001).
68. Dowling, R., Florida Intrastate Highway System, Multi-Modal Cor-
ridor Level of Service Analysis, Final Report, Florida Department
of Transportation, Office of the State Transportation Planner,
Systems Planning Office, Tallahassee, FL (June 2001).
69. Phillips, R., J. Karachepone, and B. Landis, Multi-Modal Qual-
ity of Service Project, Urban and Regional Planning Department,
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (March 2001).
70. Guttenplan, M., et al. “Multimodal Level-Of-Service Analysis At
Planning Level,” Transportation Research Record 1776, Trans-
portation Research Board, Washington, DC (2001).
71. Guttenplan, M., et al. “Planning Level Areawide Multi-Modal
Level of Service (LOS) Analysis.” Presented at the Transportation
Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2003).
72. Trochim, W. Research Methods Knowledgebase, A web-based
textbook, http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/, Cornell Uni-
versity (2002).
73. Noel, N., C. Leclerc, and M. Lee-Gosselin. “CRC Index: Compat-
ibility of Roads for Cyclist in Rural and Urban Fringe Areas.”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meet-
ing, Washington, DC (2003).
74. Landis, B., et al. “Intersection Level of Service: The Bicycle
Through Movement.” Presented at the Transportation Research
Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2003).
75. Landis, B., V. Vattikuti, and M. Brannick. “Real-Time Human
Perceptions: Towards a Bicycle Level of Service,” Transportation
Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Research Record 1578, Transportation Research Board, Washing-
ton, DC (1997).
76. Pecheux, K., M. Pietrucha, and P. Jovanis. “User Perception of
Level of Service at Signalized Intersections: Methodological
Issues,” Transportation Research Circular E-C018, Fourth Inter-
national Symposium on Highway Capacity, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, DC (June 2000).
77. Sutaria, T., and J. Haynes. “Level of Service at Signalized Inter-
sections,” Transportation Research Record 644, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, DC (1977).
78. Hall, F., S. Wakefield, and A. Al-Kaisy, “Freeway Quality of Ser-
vice: What Really Matters to Drivers and Passengers?” Trans-
portation Research Record 1776, Transportation Research Board,
Washington, DC (2001).
79. Pecheux, K., M. Pietrucha, and P. Jovanis. “User Perception of
Level of Service at Signalized Intersections: Methodological
Issues,” Transportation Research Circular E-C018, Fourth Inter-
national Symposium on Highway Capacity, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, DC (June 2000).
80. Sutaria, T., and J. Haynes. “Level of Service at Signalized Inter-
sections,” Transportation Research Record 644, Transportation
Research Board, Washington, DC (1977).
81. Nakamura, H., K. Suzuki, and S. Ryu. “Analysis of the Interrela-
tionship Among Traffic Flow Conditions, Driving Behavior, and
Degree of Driver’s Satisfaction on Rural Motorways,” Trans-
portation Research Circular E-C018, Fourth International Sym-
posium on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board,
Washington, DC (June 2000).
82. Colman, S. “Assessing Arterial Level of Service for Congestion
Management Programs: A User Perspective,” 1994 ITE Interna-
tional Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers,
Washington, DC (1994).
83. Morpace International, Inc. TCRP Report 47: A Handbook for
Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality, Transporta-
tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington,
DC (1999).
84. Landis, B. W., et al. “Intersection Level of Service: The Bicycle
Through Movement.” Presented at the Transportation Research
Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2003).
85. Harkey, D., D. Reinfurt, and M. Knuiman. “Development of the
Bicycle Compatibility Index,” Transportation Research Record
1636, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (1998).
86. Jones, E., and T. Carlson. “Development of a Bicycle Compatibil-
ity Index for Rural Roads in Nebraska.” Presented at the Trans-
portation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC
(2003).
87. Noel, N., C. Leclerc, and M. Lee-Gosselin, “CRC Index: Compat-
ibility of Roads for Cyclist in Rural and Urban Fringe Areas.”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meet-
ing, Washington, DC (2003b).
88. Landis, B., V. Vattikuti, and M. Brannick. “Real-Time Human
Perceptions: Towards a Bicycle Level of Service,” Transportation
Research Record 1578, Transportation Research Board, Wash-
ington, DC (1997).
89. Stinson, M., and C. Bhat. “An Analysis of Commuter Bicyclist
Route Choice Using a Stated Preference Survey.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2003).
90. Miller, J., J. Bigelow, and N. Garber. “Calibrating Pedestrian
Level-of-Service Metrics with 3-D Visualization.” Transportation
Research Record 1705, Transportation Research Board, National
Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 9-15 (2000).
Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets
91. Landis, B., et al. “Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment:
Pedestrian LOS,” Transportation Research Record 1773, Trans-
portation Research Board, Washington, DC (2001).
92. Chu, X., and M. Baltes. Pedestrian Mid-block Crossing Difficulty,
National Center for Transit Research, University of South
Florida, Tampa, FL (2001).
93. Nadeir, J., and B. Raman, “Design Consideration in Simulating
Interactive Virtual Pedestrian Environments.” Presented at the
Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington,
DC (2002).
94. United States Census, Ranking Tables for Population of Metropol-
itan Statistical Areas, http://www.census.gov/population/www/
estimates/metrodef.html) (2004).
95. Davison, A., and D. Hinkley. Bootstrap Methods and their Appli-
cation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1997).
96. Searle, S.R. Linear Models for Unbalanced Data. New York: Wiley
(1987).
97. Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition, John Wiley
& Sons, Hoboken, NJ (2002).
98. Furth, P., and T. Miller. “Service Reliability and Hidden Wait-
ing Time: Insights from AVL Data,” Transportation Research
Record 1955, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
(2006).
99. Balcombe, R. (editor). “The demand for transport: a practical
guide,” Report TRL593, TRL Limited, Wokingham, UK (2004).
100. Pratt, R. TCRP Research Results Digest 61: Traveler Response to
Transportation System Changes—An Interim Introduction to the
Handbook, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
(2003).
101. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., et al. TCRP A-23A Bus Rapid Tran-
sit Practitioners Guide, Final Draft (2006).
102. St. Jacques, K., and H. Levinson. TCRP Report 26: Operational
Analysis of Bus Lanes on Arterials, Transportation Research
Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (1997).
Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
101
103. Newell, G. “Dispatching Policies for a Transportation Route,”
Transportation Science, Vol. 5, pp. 91-105 (1971).
104. Mohring, H. “Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus
Transportation,” American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 40,
pp.591-604 (1972).
105. Balcombe, R. (editor). “The demand for transport: a practical
guide”, Report TRL593, TRL Limited, Wokingham, United
Kingdom (2004a).
106. Balcombe, R. (editor). “The demand for transport: a practical
guide”, Report TRL593, TRL Limited, Wokingham, United
Kingdom, Table 8.9, non-London commuter values (2004b).
107. Turnquist, M. “A Model for Investigating the Effects of Service
Frequency and Reliability on Bus Passenger Waiting Times,”
Transportation Research Record 663, Transportation Research
Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (1978).
108. Outwater, M., and W. Charlton. “The San Francisco Model in
Practice: Validation, Testing, and Application,” presented at the
Innovations in Travel Modeling 2006 Conference, Austin, Texas
(May 21-23, 2006).
109. Balcombe, R. (editor). “The demand for transport: a practical
guide,” Report TRL593, TRL Limited, Wokingham, United
Kingdom (2004).
110. The Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Transporta-
tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington,
DC (2000).
111. 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, Florida Department of
Transportation, Office of the State Transportation Planner, Sys-
tems Planning Office, Tallahassee, FL, (http://www11.myflorida.
com/planning/systems/sm/los/) (January 7, 2003).
112. Petritsch, T., et al. “Level-of-Service Model for Pedestrians at
Signalized Intersections,” Transportation Research Record 1939,
Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2005).
113. The Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Trans-
portation Research Board, Washington, DC, pg. 18-7 (2000).