Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

Baku,

Baku, Azerbaidschan,
Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15,
13-15, 2018
18th IFAC
Stability Conference Sept 2018Culture and International
on Technology,
Stability
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018
18th
Baku,IFAC Conference Sept
Azerbaidschan, on Technology, Availableand
13-15, 2018Culture
online at www.sciencedirect.com
International
18th IFAC
Stability Conference on Technology, Culture and International
Stability
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018 ScienceDirect
An
An Experimental
Experimental Study
Study toto Investigate
Investigate the the Effect
Effect of
of the
the Angle
Angle ofof Attack
Attack
IFAC
An Experimental Study onPapersOnLine
toVToL 51-30
Investigate
UAV (2018) 441–445
the Effect
Propellers of the Angle of Attack
An Experimental Study ontoVToL UAV Propellers
Investigate the Effect of the Angle of Attack
on VToL UAV Propellers
An
An Experimental
Fatih Study
Fatih AKKOYUN,
Experimental Study
AKKOYUN, onto
toVToL
Ismail
Ismail UAVPinar
Investigate
BOGREKCI,
Investigate
BOGREKCI, Propellers
the Effect
Effect of
of the
the Angle
the DEMIRCIOGLU,
Pinar DEMIRCIOGLU, Salih of
of Attack
Salih VARDIN
Angle Attack
VARDIN

on VToL
Fatih AKKOYUN, Ismail
on VToL UAV
BOGREKCI,
UAV Propellers
Pinar DEMIRCIOGLU, Salih VARDIN
Propellers
Fatih AKKOYUN, Ismail BOGREKCI,  Pinar DEMIRCIOGLU, Salih VARDIN
Adnan Menderes
Adnan Menderes University,
University,
 Aydin, 09010,
Aydin, 09010, Turkey
Turkey
(Tel: Fatih AKKOYUN, Ismail BOGREKCI, Pinar DEMIRCIOGLU, Salih VARDIN
(Tel: +90
+90 256
256 213213Fatih2000
2000 ;; e-mail:
AKKOYUN,e-mail:Adnan fatih.akkoyun@adu.edu.tr;
fatih.akkoyun@adu.edu.tr;
Ismail BOGREKCI,
Menderes University,
 Pinaribogrekci@adu.edu.tr;
ibogrekci@adu.edu.tr;
DEMIRCIOGLU,
Aydin, 09010, Turkey Salih pinar.demircioglu@adu.edu.tr;
pinar.demircioglu@adu.edu.tr;
VARDIN
Adnan
(Tel: +90 256 213 2000 ; e-mail: fatih.akkoyun@adu.edu.tr; Menderes svardin@adu.edu.tr)
University,

svardin@adu.edu.tr) Aydin, 09010, Turkey
ibogrekci@adu.edu.tr; pinar.demircioglu@adu.edu.tr;
(Tel: +90 256 213 2000 ; e-mail:Adnan fatih.akkoyun@adu.edu.tr;
Menderes University, ibogrekci@adu.edu.tr;
svardin@adu.edu.tr) Aydin, 09010, Turkey pinar.demircioglu@adu.edu.tr;
Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, 09010, Turkey
svardin@adu.edu.tr)
(Tel: +90 256 213 2000 ; e-mail: fatih.akkoyun@adu.edu.tr; ibogrekci@adu.edu.tr; pinar.demircioglu@adu.edu.tr;
(Tel: +90 256 213 2000 ; e-mail: fatih.akkoyun@adu.edu.tr; ibogrekci@adu.edu.tr; pinar.demircioglu@adu.edu.tr;
svardin@adu.edu.tr)
Abstract: Popularity
Abstract: Popularity of of Unmanned
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Vehicles (UAVs)
Aerialsvardin@adu.edu.tr) (UAVs) is is continuously
continuously increasingincreasing for for scientists
scientists as as
UAVs
UAVs allow
Abstract: allow observation
observation
Popularity of large
of large areas
of Unmanned areas
Aerial of land
of Vehicles surfaces
land surfaces (UAVs) economically
economically
is continuously and swiftly
and swiftly
increasing when
when compared
forcompared
scientists as to
to
traditional
Abstract:
traditional
UAVs allow methods.
Popularity
methods.
observationAnd
of today
Unmanned
And todayof large the importance
Aerial
the areas
importance of
Vehicles
of landofsurfacesUAVs
(UAVs)is also
is
UAVs iseconomically increasing
continuously
also increasing for civil
increasing
andforswiftly applications
for
civil applications such
scientists
when compared such as as
to
transporting,
UAVs allow
transporting, agricultural
observation
agricultural spraying
of large
spraying etc.
the areas
etc. These
of Vehicles
These land kind of
ofsurfaces
kind of civil applications
iseconomically
civil applications andare
are expected
forswiftly
expected whento
to require
compared more to
traditional
Abstract: methods.
Popularity And today
of Unmanned importance
Aerial UAVs
(UAVs) also increasing
is continuously forrequire
civil applications
increasing such
scientists more as
power
Abstract: and
traditional
power and different
Popularity
methods. propeller
of
And Unmanned
today geometries
the Aerial
importance to provide
Vehicles
of UAVs higher
(UAVs)is payload
is
also capacities.
continuously
increasing for In
increasing
civil this context,
for
applications scientists
suchaerial
as
UAVs allowdifferent
transporting, agricultural
observation propeller
spraying
of large geometries
areas oftoland
etc. These provide
kind ofhigher
surfaces civil payload capacities.
applications
economically andare swiftly In this
expected whentocontext,
require
compared aerial
more to
vehicle’s
UAVs allow
transporting,
vehicle’s propeller size
observation
agricultural
propeller size and
andofpitch
large
spraying
pitch are
areas
etc.important
oftoland
These parameters
surfaces
kind ofhigher
civil in order
economically to
inapplications obtain
andare proper
swiftly
expected lifting
when capacity
compared
tocontext,
require for
more to
power and
traditional different
methods. propeller
And today theare
geometries important
importance parameters
provide
of UAVs is also order
payload to capacities.
increasing obtain forproper
civil lifting
Inapplications
this capacity
such for
aerial
as
traditional
Vertical
power
Vertical
vehicle’s and methods.
Take-off
different
Take-off
propeller and
and And
size today
Landing
propeller
Landing
and pitch theare
(VToL)
(VToL) importance
geometries UAVs.
UAVs. to
important of
provide UAVs
parameters is also
higher in increasing
payload
order to forproper
capacities.
obtain civilIn applications
this
liftingcontext, such
capacity as
aerial
for
transporting, agricultural spraying etc. These kind of civil applications are expected to require more
transporting,
vehicle’s
Vertical Take-off agricultural
propeller andsize and
Landingspraying
pitch(VToL) etc.important
are These kind
UAVs. of civilinapplications
parameters are proper
order to capacities.
obtain expected to require
lifting capacity more
for
power
There and
is different
aa number ofpropeller
terms geometries to provide higher payload In this context, aerial
power
There
Vertical isand different
number
Take-off and terms to
ofpropeller
Landing define
geometries
to(VToL) the
the topropeller's
define UAVs. provide higher
propeller's specifications
payloadsuch
specifications as
as diameter,
capacities.
such In thispitch,
diameter, context,
pitch, disc area
discaerial
area
vehicle’sbore,
relation, propeller
materialsize type
and pitch
etc. are important
These characteristicsparametersmust in order
be to obtain
calculated to proper lifting capacity for
relation,
vehicle’s
There bore,
is Take-off material
apropeller
number size type etc.
and pitch
ofLanding
terms These
to(VToL) characteristics
are important
define the propeller'sparametersmust be calculated
in order
specifications tosuch toasdesign
obtain design
proper the
diameter, optimal
thelifting
optimal
pitch, propeller
propeller
capacity
disc for
area
Vertical
accordingly to matchand UAVs.
There
Verticalis Take-off
accordingly
relation, a number
bore, andofspecific
to material
match terms
specific
Landing
type etc. needs
to define
needs
(VToL)
These of aerial
of UAVs.
aerial vehicle
vehicle characteristics.
the propeller's
characteristics specifications
characteristics.
must be calculated It is
Itsuch very
is to
very important
asdesign
diameter,
important that
that both
pitch,
the optimal disc
both angle
area
angle
propeller
of
of attack
relation, and todiameter should properly be investigated to be able to
to choose optimal propeller. The effect
is bore,
attack
accordingly
There and
a numbermaterial
diameter
matchofspecifictype etc.
should
terms These
properly
needs
to define of characteristics
be
theinvestigated
aerial must
to bebe
vehicle characteristics.
propeller's calculated
able
specifications choose is to
Itsuch very design
optimal
as the
diameter, optimal
propeller.
important pitch, propeller
The
that bothdisc effect
angle
area
of angle
There is
accordingly of
angle bore,
of attack a
of attack
number
to
andattackmatch dominates
of terms
specific
dominates
diameter should characteristics
to define
needs of
characteristics
properly the
aerial of the
propeller's
vehicle propellers
of the propellers
be investigated and
specifications
characteristics.
to bebe and
able in turn,
such
It
in choose
to is aerial
very
turn, aerial as vehicles.
diameter,
important
vehicles. In
thatthis
pitch,
In thisbothmanner,
disc area
angle
manner,
relation, material type etc. These characteristics must calculated to optimal
design propeller.
the optimal The effect
propeller
this
of paper
relation,
attack
thisangle and focuses
bore,
paperoffocuses on
material
diameter thetypeangle
should
on specific
the angle etc. of
properlyattack
These
of attack be of the
characteristicspropeller
investigated
of ofthe propeller must
to and
be be propeller
calculated
able
andand to choose
propeller length
to as
design
optimal these
the variables
optimal
propeller. The have
propeller
effect a
of
accordingly attack
to match dominates characteristics
needs of aerial the
vehicle propellers
characteristics. It islength
in turn, aerial as these variables
vehicles.
very important In
thatthis
both have
anglea
manner,
huge
of
huge effect
accordingly
angle
effect
thisattack
paperandof on
to
on power
match
attack
power
focuses consumption
specific
dominates
on the needs and
of
characteristics
consumption
angleproperly and
of attack lifting
aerial of
lifting capacity.
vehicle
the propellers
capacity. The
The andeffect
characteristics. in
effect Itof
turn,
of is angle
very
aerial
angle of attack
important
vehicles.
of attack that
In
thatthisdominates
both angle
manner,
dominates
of diameter should be of the propeller
investigated andable
to be propeller
to choose length as these
optimal variables
propeller. Thehaveeffecta
characteristics
of
thisattack
paper andon of propellers
diameter should and oflifting
properly andbecapacity of
investigated aerial vehicles
to be able towas ofinvestigated.
choose optimal Experiment
propeller. The results
effecta
huge
of effect
angle offocuses
characteristics attack on the
ofpower
propellers angle
and
consumption
dominates attack
lifting
characteristics of thethe
capacity
lifting
of propeller
ofpropellers
aerial
capacity. and
The propeller
vehicles
and inwas
effectturn, length
aerial as
investigated.
angle of these variables
Experiment
attack
vehicles. thatthis
In have
results
dominates
manner,
are
of
huge
are presented
angle
effectof onfor
attack comparison
powerdominates
consumptionof the propellers
characteristics
and of
lifting performance
the propellers
capacity. and
The andoutcomes
in
effectturn,
of were
aerial
angle explained
vehicles.
of attack using
In
thatthis charts.
manner,
dominates
this presented
characteristics
paper focuses for
of comparison
propellers
on the angle of the
and propellers
oflifting
attack capacity
of the performance
of aerial and
propeller andpropeller
vehiclesoutcomes were explained
was investigated.
length as these using charts.
Experiment
variables resultsa
have
this paper focuses
characteristics of on the angle
propellers and oflifting
attack of the
capacity propeller
of aerial and propeller
vehicles was length
investigated.as these variables
Experiment have
resultsa
© 2018,
are
huge
Keywords:
Keywords:
huge IFAC
presented
effect
effect
on(International
for
VToL
VToL
on
comparison
power
UAVconsumption
UAV
power Federation
of
Propeller,
Propeller,
consumption
the Angle
Angle
andof of
Automatic
propellers
and lifting
of Attack,
Attack,
lifting Control)The
performance
capacity.
Propeller
Propeller
capacity. Hosting
and
The
effectbyofElsevier
outcomes
performance
performance
effect of angle
were
angle Ltd. All rights
explained
of attack
comparison.
comparison.
of attack
that reserved.
using charts.
dominates
that dominates
are presented for comparison of the propellers performance and outcomes
characteristics of propellers and lifting capacity of aerial vehicles was investigated. Experiment results were explained using charts.
characteristics
Keywords: VToLof propellers
UAV Propeller, and liftingAngle capacity
of Attack, of aerial vehicles
 Propeller was investigated.
performance comparison. Experiment results
are presented
Keywords: for comparison
VToL UAV Propeller, of theAnglepropellers
of Attack,performance
Propellerand outcomes were
performance explained using charts.
comparison.
are presented for comparison of the propellers performance ducted and outcomes were explained using charts.
 ducted propellers
propellers were were more more efficient
efficient but but onon thethe other
other hand
hand
Keywords:1. 1. VToL UAV
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION Propeller, Angle of Attack,  Propeller
thrust performance
generation was comparison.
decreased (Yilmaz et al., 2015). Inhand
the
Keywords: VToL UAV Propeller, Angle of Attack, Propeller thrust generation
ducted performance
propellers were was decreased
more efficient but on the otherIn
comparison. (Yilmaz et al., 2015). the
1. INTRODUCTION study
ducted
study
thrust of
of Bontempo
propellers
Bontempo
generation were
was et
et al.,
more
al., airflow
efficient
airflow
decreased around
buteton
around
(Yilmaz ducted
the
ducted
al., propellers
other hand
propellers
2015). In the
In
In general
general the the propeller's
propeller's length
length provides
1. INTRODUCTION provides more more powerpower but but were
thrust analyzed
generation with was aaetdecreased
semi-analytical(Yilmaz actuator
et al., disk
2015). model
In at
the
also increases were
study analyzed
of Bontempowith semi-analytical
al., airflow actuator
around
ducted propellers were more efficient but on the other hand ducteddisk model
propellers at
alsogeneral
In increases the heating
heating
propeller's
1.
of
of the
the
length
INTRODUCTION
motor,
motor, and
and its
provides pitch
itsmore provides
pitchpower
provides but various
ducted
study
various operating
propellers
of Bontempo
operating conditions.
were et more
al.,
conditions. According
efficient
airflow but
around
According to
on
to the
the
ducted
the authors,
other the
hand
propellers
authors, the
higher
In revolutions per minute (RPM) nevertheless it causes were
thrust analyzed
generation with was a semi-analytical
decreased (Yilmaz actuator
et al., disk
2015). model
In at
alsogeneral
higherincreases the heating
revolutions propeller's
per length
minute
1. INTRODUCTION
of the (RPM)
motor,provides itsmore
nevertheless
and pitchpower
itprovides
causesbut proposed
thrust
proposed method
generation
were analyzed method with accounted
was aetdecreased
accounted for
semi-analytical
for variables
(Yilmaz
variables etsuch
actuator al.,
such as
disk
as slipstream
2015). In the
model
slipstreamthe
at
more current drawing. various
study ofoperating
Bontempo conditions.
al., According
airflow around to the
ducted authors,
propellers
also
more
higher
In increases
current
general heating
thedrawing.
revolutions per Decreasing
propeller's of the
Decreasing
minute
length motor,
(RPM) the prop’s
the and
prop’s
nevertheless
provides
pitch
itsmore
pitch or
pitchpower length
itprovides
or length
causes contraction,
study
but various of wake
Bontempo
operating rotation,
et al.,
conditions. shape
airflow
According ducts
around to and
ducted
the radial load
propellers
authors, the
is
In the easiest
general
higher
is the
more easiest
current way topersolve
thedrawing.
revolutions propeller's
way to solve aa heat
heat
length
minute
Decreasing (RPM)problem
provides
problem
the and
prop’s but
more
nevertheless
but thispower
this
pitch limits
itprovides
limits
or causes
lengththe contraction,
but
the
proposed
were analyzed wake
method with rotation,
accounted shape
for
a semi-analytical ducts
variablesactuator anddisk
such asradial
model load
slipstream at
also increases heating of the motor, its pitch distribution.
were analyzed
proposed
distribution.
contraction, Integration
method with
wake accounted
Integration rotation,of
of the
a semi-analytical
for
the system
variables
system
shape ductswas
actuator
wassuch
andclaimed
disk
asauthors,
claimed to
model
slipstream
radial be
toloadat
be
performance
also
more increases
current
performance of the
heating
drawing.
of vehicle.
of the To
Decreasing select
motor, the and the
prop’s right
its pitch
pitch pitch for
provides
or length a various operating conditions. According to the the
is the easiest
higher waythetoper
revolutions vehicle.
solve
minute To(RPM)
a heat select
problem thebut right
nevertheless thispitch
limits forthea various
it causes fairly
contraction,
fairly operating
easy due
easymethodwake
due to conditions.
reduced
rotation,
toaccounted
reduced According
computational
shape ducts to the
cost.
and authors,
In the
addition,
radial load
distribution. Integration of computational
the system was cost. asInslipstream
claimed addition,
to be
propeller,
higher
is
propeller,
performance certain
revolutions
the current
easiest waythe
certain
of parameters
toper
parametersminute
solve
vehicle. need
To(RPM)
a heat
need to
to benevertheless
problem investigated
thebeprop’s
select the but
right itsuch
thispitch
investigated limitscauses
orsuch asa proposed
as
forthe overall
proposed performance
method was of
for variables
examined
such
by comparison
comparison of ducted
more
more
power current
performance
drawing.
drawing.
consumption,
of the
Decreasing
Decreasing
propeller
vehicle. To speedthe
select prop’s
limitations
the
pitch
pitch
right or
and
pitch
length
length
ideal
for a
distribution.
overall
fairly easyperformance
contraction, due
wake toaccounted
Integration was
reduced
rotation,
for variables
the
examined system
shape by
computational ductswassuch
cost.
and
asInslipstream
claimed of
radial toload
ducted
addition,be
power
is consumption,
propeller,
the easiestcertain
wayparameters propeller
to solve need
a heat speed
to belimitations
problem but this and
investigated such
limits ideal
as contraction,
the and
fairly open
easy rotors
wake
due in
to order
rotation,
reduced to be able
shape to
computational quantify
ducts andthe
cost. In effects
radial
addition,of
load
propeller
is
propeller, speed,
the easiest way
certain and togearsolve
parameters reduction
a heat
need (Garner,
problem
to 2009).
but
belimitations this and
investigated limits
such the and
overallopen
asa distribution. rotors
performance in order
was to be
examined able to
by
Integration of the system was claimed to bequantify
comparison the effects
of ductedof
propeller
power
performance speed,
of and
consumption, the gear reduction
propeller
vehicle. Tospeed (Garner,
select the 2009).
right pitch ideal
for the duct.
distribution.
overall The authors
Integration
performance wasaimed
of to
the
examined match
system
by thewaspropeller
comparison claimed load
of to and
ductedbe
performance
power of the gear
consumption, vehicle.
propeller Tospeedselect the 2009).
right pitch for the
and duct.
open The authors
rotors in order aimed
to beto match
able
a fairly easy due to reduced computational cost. In addition, to the propeller
quantify the load
effects and
of
propeller
propeller, speed,
certainand parameters reduction
need to belimitations
(Garner, investigated and such ideal
as fairlyduct
and
duct
the geometry
easy
open
duct. rotors
geometry
The inappropriately,
dueauthors
to reduced
order
appropriately,to
aimed beto in
able
in
match toan
computational an attempt
cost.the
quantify
theattempt
propeller Into
to exploit
addition,
effects
exploit
load of
and
propeller,
propeller certain
speed, andparameters
gear need to
reduction be investigated
(Garner, 2009). and such as overall performance was examined by comparison of ducted
1.1
power
1.1 Literature
Literature Review
consumption, propeller speed limitations
Reviewpropeller speed limitations and ideal and ideal overall
potential
the duct.
potential
duct open performance
benefits
The authors
benefits
geometry thatwas examined
could
aimed
that could to be
match by comparison
obtained
the
bein obtained by
propeller
bythe of
ducting ducted
load
ducting the
and
the
power consumption, rotors inappropriately,
order to be able toanquantify
attempt toeffects
exploitof
propeller
1.1 speed,Review
Literature and gear reduction (Garner, 2009). and open
propeller
duct
propeller
potential rotors
(Bontempo
geometry
(Bontempo
benefits inappropriately,
order
that et
et to2014).
al.,
al., be able
2014).
could be toanquantify
in obtained attemptby the toeffects
ductingexploitof
the
propeller speed,Review
and gear reduction (Garner, 2009). the duct. The authors aimed to match the propeller load and
1.1 Literature
Recent studies consisted of aerial
Recent studies consisted of aerial vehicle propeller duct vehicle propeller the duct.
potential
propeller The authors
benefits
(Bontempo that aimed
could to match
be the
obtained propeller
by
et al., 2014).in an attempt to exploit load
ducting and
the
geometry appropriately,
characteristics and effects
effects of of attack angle
angle of VToL
VToL propellers
propeller duct propeller
In geometry
In multiple (Bontempo
studies, appropriately,
et al., 2014).
combinations in ofanVToL attempt to exploit
characteristics
Recent
1.1 studies
Literature and
Reviewconsisted attack
of aerial ofvehicle propellers multiple
potential studies,
benefits thatcombinations
could be of VToL
obtained and fixed
and ducting
by fixed wing
wing
the
1.1
on
on Literature
flight
Recent
flight studiesReview
performance.
consisted
performance. Ducted
Ducted of propellers
aerial
propellers vehicle
characteristics and effects of attack angle of VToL propellers propeller and
and geometry
propeller
geometry potential
(FW)
(FW) benefits
approaches
approaches that
were could
inspected be obtained
and by
implemented ductingfor the
In multiple studies,were
(Bontempo inspected
combinations
et al., 2014). of andVToL implemented
and fixedforwing the
optimization
characteristics
optimization
on flight were
and
were considered
effects
considered
performance. of
Ducted as
attack
as well
well in
angle
in
propellers the
of
the literature.
VToL
literature.
and Take-
propellers
Take-
geometry propeller
same
In
same multiple (Bontempo
aerial
aerial vehicle.
studies,
vehicle. et
In al.,
their 2014).
combinations
In their study,
study, Cakici
of VToL
Cakici and
and andLeblebicioglu
fixed
Leblebiciogluwing
Recent studies consisted of aerial vehicle propeller (FW) approaches were inspected and implemented for the
off and
Recent
on forward
flight studies flight
performance. simulations
consisted Ducted of were
aerialincarried
propellers vehicle out
and with
propeller
geometry zero
zero (FW) (2016) designed
approaches aa were
control system
study, in
inspected and order to
implementedimprove level
off and forward
optimization
characteristics wereflight
and simulations
considered
effects as well
of attack were
angle carried
the
of VToL out propellers
with
literature. Take- (2016)
same
In designed
aerial
multiple vehicle.
studies, control
In their system
combinations in
of order
Cakici
VToL toand
and fixedforwing
improve
Leblebicioglu the
level
characteristics
angle
angle
off of
optimization
offorward and
attack
were
attack effects
by
considered of
Yilmaz
by simulations
Yilmaz attack
asetwell
et wereangle
al. in
al. (2015). of
(2015).
the VToL The propellers
literature.
Thewith authors
Take-
authors flight
In
same capability
multiple
aerial studies,
vehicle. of UAVs.
combinations
In their Testing
study, of of
Cakici the
VToL anddesigned
and fixed system
Leblebiciogluwing
on and
flight flight
performance. Ducted carriedand
propellers out geometry zero (FW) flight
(2016)capability
designed of
a UAVs.
control Testing
system in
approaches were inspected and implemented for theof the
order designed
to improve system
level
investigated
on and
off flight
offorwardducted
performance.
flight propellers
Ducted
simulations for UAVs.
propellers
were carriedAccording
and
out
Thewith to
geometry the
zero
the (FW) was approaches
flightcarried
(2016) designedout. were
out. aofThecontrol inspected
system was and
able implemented
theto switch for
betweenthe
investigated
angle
optimization ducted
attack
were by propellers
Yilmaz
considered asfor
etwell UAVs.
al. theAccording
in(2015). literature. to
authors
Take- was
same carried
capability
aerial vehicle. The theirsystem
In system
UAVs. wasin
Testing
study, oforder
able
Cakici to
toand improve
switch
designed level
between
system
Leblebicioglu
authors,
optimization
angle
authors, of
investigateddifferent
were
attack
different
ducted flow
by
flow conditions
considered
Yilmaz
conditions
propellers aset affected
wellal. in
affected
for were
UAVs. the
(2015). variables
literature.
The
variables
According such
Take-
authors
such
tozero as
as VToL
the VToL
same
flight and
aerial FW
capability
was carriedand FW flight
vehicle. of
out.flight In
UAVs. modes
their
modes with
study,
Testing
with
wasinanan
Cakici
of algorithm.
the and
algorithm. Results
Leblebicioglu
designed system
Results of
of
off and forward flight simulations carried out with (2016) designed aThe
control systemsystem able
order to toswitch
improve between
level
surface
off and
investigated
surface pressure
forward
authors,ofpressureductedmeasurements,
flight simulations
propellers forvelocity,
were
UAVs. carriedtorque out
According and
with to force
zero
the their
(2016)
was study claimed
designed
carried out. aThethat
control the
system proposed
systemwas in system
order
able to towas expected
improve
switch to
level
between
angle attack measurements,
different flow
by Yilmazconditions et velocity,
affected
al. (2015). torque Theandsuch
variables force
authors as their flightstudy
VToL and claimed
FW flight
capability of that
UAVs. the proposed
modes with an
Testing system
of was expected
algorithm.
the designed Results
system to
of
and
angle
and these
authors, of variables
attack
different
thesepressure
surface variables by
flow were
were
measurements,considered
Yilmaz
conditions
considered et al.for
affected optimization
(2015).
for optimization The
variables of
torque andoftoforce duct
authors
such as
duct improve
flight
VToL flight
capability
and FW characteristics
of
flight UAVs. modes of UAVs
Testing
with anof with
the increased
designed
algorithm. agility
system
Results of
investigated ducted propellers forvelocity,
UAVs. According the improve
their study
was carried flight characteristics
claimed
out. Thethatsystem ofwas
the proposed UAVs with
system
able to increased
was
switch agility
expected
between to
investigated
geometry.
surface
and thesepressure
geometry. ducted
Results
Results
variables of
of propellers
weretheir
measurements,
their study
study
considered forvelocity,
UAVs.
showed
showed According
that operation
torque
that
for optimization operationoftoforce
andsuch the
of and
of
duct their maneuverability
was carried
study out. The
claimed (Cakici
system
thatmodes and
was
the proposed Leblebicioglu,
able
systemto increased
switch
was 2016).
between
expected to
authors, different flow conditions affected variables as and improve
VToL maneuverability
flight
and FWcharacteristics
flight (Cakici of andan
UAVs
with Leblebicioglu,
with
algorithm. 2016).
agility
Results of
authors,
and these
geometry. different
variables
Results flow
ofwere conditions
considered
their study affected
for
showed variables
optimization
that such
operationof as and
duct
of VToL
improve and FW
flight flight
characteristics
maneuverability modes with
of UAVs an algorithm.
with increasedResults of
agility
surface pressure measurements, velocity, torque and force their study claimed that (Cakici the proposed and system
Leblebicioglu,
was expected 2016).to
surface
Copyright pressure measurements,
of their studyvelocity, showed torque and force
and these©
geometry.
Copyright 2018
2018 IFAC
IFACwere considered for optimization of duct 441
Results
©variables
that operation of 441 and
their study
improve
claimed that (Cakici
maneuverability
flight characteristics
the proposed and system
of UAVs
was expected to
Leblebicioglu,
with increased 2016). agility
and these variables were considered for optimization of duct improve flight characteristics of UAVs with increased agility
Copyright
geometry.© Results
2018 IFAC of their study showed that operation of 441 and maneuverability (Cakici and Leblebicioglu, 2016).
geometry.©
2405-8963
Copyright 2018,
© ResultsIFAC
2018 IFAC of (International
their study Federation
showed that of Automatic
operation Control)
of 441Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All(Cakici
and maneuverability rights reserved.
and Leblebicioglu, 2016).
Peer review under responsibility of International Federation of Automatic Control.
10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.322
Copyright © 2018 IFAC 441
Copyright © 2018 IFAC 441
IFAC TECIS 2018
442
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018 Fatih Akkoyun et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-30 (2018) 441–445

Simulations were used to comprehend variables affecting


control of UAVs. Various models were generated and
inspected in the literature. Aerial vehicle dynamic modelling
method was presented in order to acquire and investigate
unknown parameters. The implemented identification 3010 propeller
experiments according to various sources and features of
unknown parameters. Attitude control system was designed
and tested by the authors, then verification of improvement
was carried out by simulating UAV flight at different
conditions. The mathematical results they obtained showed
that accuracy of the proposed model was comparatively
better with parameter identification (Zhengjie et al., 2013).
Another control method was proposed by Ruggiero et al.
(2015) for VToL UAVs. Disturbance effects because of 3095 propeller
external forces and moments acting on the vehicle were
inspected, the authors aimed to compensate such disturbances
in the study. Their control system arrangement enabled VToL
UAVs to carry out tasks such as hovering, tracking and aerial
manipulation. Experimental tests were presented by the Fig. 1. Compared propellers
authors in order to evaluate the effects of proposed control
design on the UAV performance (Ruggiero et al., 2015). Results showed that pitch effect increased thrust along with
power consumption as the motor required more current. In
Wing rock motion and the angle of attack relationship was order to investigate the effect of the pitch on propeller
examined in Xu and Deng’s study (2015). The authors aimed performance a simple lever mechanism was used to simulate
to reveal different patterns of wing rock motion and lateral a VToL UAV arm. A VToL UAV arm was assembled to the
deflection. Lateral deflection and wing rock motion was custom lever and was balanced with a counterweight. Thus,
claimed to be induced by separated flow from wings. At low thrust force measurements could resemble operational
angles of attack, flow separation and asymmetric vortices conditions closely as shown in Fig. 2. The arm consisted of
were tested and experimental rotating nose technique was an electronic speed controller (ESC), a brushless direct
included in the model to reduce wing rock or lateral current (BLDC) motor, a gear reducer that had a ratio 20/68
deflection. The authors stated that the uncommanded and shown in Fig. 3a and a carbon fiber propeller mounted on
undesired lateral motions could be suppressed effectively by main gear as shown in Fig. 3b.
the utilization of the rotating nose technique (Xu and Deng,
2015).

2. MATERIAL AND METHOD

This paper focuses on the effect of angle of attack for mid-


size UAV carbon fiber propellers commonly used in
agricultural applications. The attack angle difference was
investigated by comparing two propellers with same length
and different pitch. In this study, a thrust test apparatus was
developed to acquire thrust force generated by utilizing a
scale. Tests were implemented to obtain power consumption,
angular velocity and thrust force measurements for each
geometry of propellers, and the graphical results were also Fig. 2. VToL UAV arm setup.
investigated. Graphical evaluation for current and voltage
versus angular speed along with power consumption versus
generated thrust relations were indicated in this paper.

Propellers used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. 3010 and


3095 propellers comparison charts are included as a result of
implemented measurement.

442
IFAC TECIS 2018
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018 Fatih Akkoyun et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-30 (2018) 441–445 443

Fig. 3. Gear Reducer mounting on the top (a) and propeller


Fig. 5. Thrust Testing Apparatus and Measuring Equipment
mounting of the propeller in the bottom (b).
UAV arm consisting of a motor, an ESC and a gear set was
mounted to one end of the lever, a precision scale was used at
the other end of the lever. The spacing between the UAV arm
and balance point (center) of the lever was set equal to the
distance between scale and balance point of the lever. The
shaft located at the balance point of the lever was assembled
to a housing by utilizing bearings (Fig. 4b). The housing let
the shaft rotate freely around horizontal axis, and was fixed to
the ground. Weight of UAV arm assembled to the test setup
was also balanced by placing an external weight (1.280 kg) to
the other end of the lever.

Thrust generation, power consumption, angular speed,


temperature, modulation signal and test duration values were
obtained by experimental study. The experimental setup is
shown in Fig. 5. The relationship between the variables
a
which could be measured with the experimental setup and the
measurement devices are given in Fig. 4a and relations
indicated in Fig 6.

Fig. 4 a. Measuring equipment: Oscilloscope, Multimeter,


Current Clamp, IR Tachometer, Joystick and PWM
Generator Board., b: Thrust testing mechanism.

Fig. 6. Measurands of the test system

For thrust measurement, the leverage principle was utilized


through test procedure and application method is shown in
Fig. 7. At the start of every test run, arms of the lever were
balanced and the scale was reset to zero so that the
measurements for new test runs would be accurate.

443
IFAC TECIS 2018
444
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018 Fatih Akkoyun et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-30 (2018) 441–445

Table 2. 3010 Temperature Test Results

Temperature

Elapsed
Pinion
Time Motor ESC Room
Gear
(min.)
0 22.4 22.4 22.4 22
Fig. 7. Lever mechanism and VToL UAV Arm lay-out
0 24.5 22.5 23.5 22
For angular speed measurement, motor frequency from the 5 58.0 36.8 36.0 22
ESC output was measured by utilizing digital 10 65.0 37.0 35.0 22
frequencymeter. Power consumption measurement was Table 3. 3095 Propeller Performance Test Results
carried out by measuring current from the battery and
potential difference of the battery. The connection scheme is Elaps Prop. Mod.
given in Fig. 8. ed Power Angular Signal Thrust
Time (W) Velocity Duty Cycle (N)
(min.) (Rad/s) (%)
0 0 0 5.56 -
0 124.78 134.41 6.06 15
247.12 167.05 6.18 24
611.70 233.38 6.54 42
847.84 263.21 6.74 54
5 1159.03 294.44 7.00 68
Fig. 8. Power and angular velocity measurement method 1384.60 312.34 7.22 77
1605.29 328.13 7.34 86
Temperature data was obtained by measuring all components 1821.09 341.47 7.56 93
separately with an IR thermometer. Its measuring range is 10 2415.42 369.89 8.00 110
between -50 °C and +600 °C with the accuracy ±1.5°C above
0°C and the resolution of this sensor is 0.1°C. Table 4. 3095 Temperature Test Results

Temperature
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION Elapsed Pinion
Motor ESC Room
Time (min.) Gear
In this study the performance data of two propellers were 0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22
investigated using the propeller thrust test apparatus. The 0 24.0 22.5 23.5 22
3010 propeller and 3095 propeller performance results 5 54.0 35.0 32.0 22
obtained from measured values are represented in Table 1 10 58.0 40.0 34.0 22
and 3. The temperature effect of the different pitch on motor,
ESC, and gear set was investigated which listed in Table 2 It is understood from tables that the angle of attack and power
and 4, respectively. consumption are proportional to each other. For equal power
consumption a propeller produces more thrust when the angle
Table 1. 3010 Propeller Performance Test Results of attack is lower. Motor, ESC and gear set temperatures are
clearly increasing when the angle of attack is higher as it is
Prop. Mod. seen in Table 2 and 4.
Elapsed Angular Signal
Time Power Velocity Duty Thrust The data obtained from the performance tests implemented in
(min.) (W) (Rad/s) Cycle (%) (N) this study is shown in Fig. 9, 10 and 11. According to the
0 0.00 0.00 5.30 - graphs showing the relation among power consumption,
0 164.80 133.01 6.68 16 thrust force and angular speed, when the angular speed is the
- 327.76 167.75 6.88 26 same, propellers with lower attack angle consumed less
- 569.94 196.53 7.08 35 power and produced more thrust. For the same amount of
- 849.45 226.36 7.28 47 power consumption, propellers with lower attack angle
5 1085.13 246.01 7.48 57 produced more thrust force.
- 1397.55 266.36 7.72 67
- 1705.81 281.10 7.92 75
- 1970.50 295.84 8.12 82
10 2323.42 312.34 8.30 91

444
IFAC TECIS 2018
Baku, Azerbaidschan, Sept 13-15, 2018 Fatih Akkoyun et al. / IFAC PapersOnLine 51-30 (2018) 441–445 445

In order to determine the optimum attack angle of a propeller,


the power consumption which affects flight duration directly
should be considered. Reduction of attack angle enables
smoother flight but provides less thrust force. Considering
the same power consumption, a propeller with lower attack
angle could reach higher RPMs generating more thrust force.
On the other hand, the lower attack angle propeller reaches
the angular speed limit rapidly thus limiting lifting force.

4. CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the study, propeller with lower


attack angle was found to be more efficient for power
consumption but reduction of attack angle increased angular
speed, and increment of angular speed brought limitations for
maximum lifting capacity. As a result, for better payload
capacity, choosing the propeller with higher attack angle
would be more convenient considering the same propeller
length. However, for smoother and longer flights, lower
Fig. 9. Power - Angular Velocity Relationship attack angle could be the better choice.

REFERENCES
Garner, W.B. (2009). Model Airplane Propellers. DCRC
Club Newsletter, Vol 55, Issue 4/5.
Yilmaz, S., Erdem, D. and Kavsaoglu, M.S. (2015).
Performance of a ducted propeller designed for UAV
applications atzero angle of attack flight: An
experimental study. Aerospace Science and Technology,
45,376-386.
Cakıcı, F. And Leblebicioglu, M.K. (2016). Control System
Design of a Vertical Take-off and Landing Fixed-Wing
UAV. IFAC – PapersOnLine, 49-3, 267-272.
Zhengjie, W., Zhijun, L., Ningjun, F. And Meifang, G.
(2013). Flight dynamics modeling of a small ducted fan
aerial vehicle based on parameter identification. Chinese
Journal of Aeronautics, 26(6), 1439-1448.
Xu, S.W. and Deng, X.Y. (2015). Effects of angle of attack
on wing rock motion induced by the flows over slender
Fig. 10. Power-Thrust Relationship body with low swept wing, Physics, Mechanics &
Astronomy, 58, 44701-1 – 44701-8.
Bontempo, R., Cardone, M., Manna, M. And Vorraro, G.
(2014). Ducted propeller flow analysis by means of a
generalized actuator disk model, Energy Procedia, 45,
1107-1115.
Ruggiero, F., Cacace, J., Sadeghian, H. And Lippiello, V.
(2015). Passivity-based control of VToL UAVs with a
momentum-based estimator of external wrench and
unmodeled dynamics. Robotics and Autonomous
Systems, 72, 139-151.

Fig. 11. Angular Velocity-Thrust Relationship

445

Potrebbero piacerti anche