The Misinterpretation of Viruses

by Dr. Stefan Lanka

All claims concerning viruses as pathogens are incorrect and are based on easily recognizable,
understandable and verifiable misinterpretations. Meanwhile, the real causes of the diseases and
phenomena attributed to viruses have been researched and applied. Instead of using viruses, all
scientists in the laboratory work with specially prepared typical components of dying cells and
tissue. They believe that the tissues and cells die because they are infected with a virus. In reality,
these laboratory tissues and cells die because they are starved and poisoned as a result of the test
conditions they are exposed to.

Virologists believe in viruses because they add supposedly infected blood, infected saliva or other
supposedly infected body fluids to the tissues and cells - after having withdrawn their nutrient
solution and after the addition of toxic antibiotics. They believe that Ideath is caused by viruses.
Tissue and cells die entirely on their own, without the addition of "infected" materials. This hasn’t
occurred to virologist! According to principles of scientific conduct, control tests should have been
carried out. In order to control the method pioneered for the supposed multiplication of viruses, i.e.
to ensure that the method itself doesn’t produce or falsify the experimental results, one would have
had to add sterile substances or substances from healthy subjects to the starving tissues and cells.

Incredibly, these control attempts have never been carried out in "science". As part of the Measles
Virus legal case, I commissioned these control tests from an independent laboratory. The result: the
tissues and cells died just as if they had come into contact with supposedly infectious materials.

It is the task of control experiments to rule out the possibility of experimental method or technique
causing the observed results. Control experiments are the top priority and a required criterion for
being able to characterise a result as scientific. As we will see, in the Measles Virus legal
proceedings, the court-appointed expert determined that those publications that constitute the
foundation for the entire discipline of virology do not contain any control experiments. From this we
learned that the scientists involved in this discipline conduct their research in an extremely
unscientific way.

The explanation for this unscientific conduct, which disqualifies the research it has produced from
claiming scientific credentials, has a historical origin: In June 1954, an unscientific and contradictory
conjecture was published according to which the death of live tissue in a test tube may indicate the
presence of a virus. Six months later, the first author of these speculative ideas received the Nobel
Prize in Medicine on December 10, 1954. This honour raised the speculation of June 1954 to the
level of scientific fact that has gone unscrutinised to this day. Ever since, the death of tissues and
cells in the test tube has been regarded as evidence for the existence of viruses.

The Apparent Evidence for the Existence of Viruses

Not only that. The death of tissues / cells is also referred to as "isolation" of the virus based on the
reasoning that something supposedly was brought into the laboratory from the outside world via an
organism, despite the fact that a virus has never been isolated in the true sense of the word,
presented in its whole form and characterized biochemically. In reality, the electron microscopic
photos of the supposed viruses reveal normal cell components of dying tissues and cells. Since the
researchers involved believe that the tissues and cells completely transform into viruses when they
die, the death of the cells is also used to infer viral multiplication.
The parties involved believe this to this day, because the researcher who pioneered the method
created this article of faith, which, due to the Nobel Prize behind it, still continues to serve as a
guiding principle in the field. More on this below.

Without purifying this mixture, which consists of dying tissues and cells from monkeys and cattle
fetuses as well as toxic antibiotics, this concoction finds its application as a "live" vaccine, since it is
now supposed to consist of weakened viruses. All of this is because the death of the tissues and cells
- in reality brought on by starvation and poisoning and not because of an alleged "infection" - has
been and continues to be misinterpreted as proof of the existence of viruses, as proof of their
isolation, and as proof of their multiplication.

In this way, the resulting toxic mixture full of foreign proteins, foreign nucleic acids, cytotoxic
antibiotics, microbes and spores of all kinds is passed off as a "live vaccine". In the vaccination
procedure, the vaccine is usually injected into the child’s muscles in an amount that, if injected into
the vein, would certainly result in immediate death. Only with complete ignorance and blind trust in
the state authorities that "test and approve" the vaccines can such an injection be described as "a
small, harmless prick".

Fig. 1.
Individual components are removed from parts of the dead tissues and cells, misinterpreted as
components of a virus and conceptually assembled into a virus model. A real and complete virus
does not appear anywhere in the entire "scientific" literature. The process of arriving at a consensus,
in which the parties involved argued about what belongs to the virus and what does not, took
decades for the measles virus. With the supposedly new "Covid-19" this process of finding consensus
only took a few mouse clicks.

With a few clicks of the mouse in a program that derives the molecular sequence from short
segments of nucleic acids (belonging to the dead tissue and cells), the supposedly complete genetic
material of a certain known or new Virus is constructed. In fact, not even these manipulations, called
"alignment", result in a "complete" genetic sequence of a virus, called its genome.

By this process of conceptually constructing the "viral genome strand", sequences of nucleic acid
that are not compatible are "ironed out" and missing ones are added. In this way, a "genetic
sequence" is invented that does not exist, has never truly been discovered and has never been
characterised as a whole.

In summary: From short fragments, a larger genetic sequence is constructed in line with a model of a
viral genome which in reality does not exist. For example, in the case of the conceptual modelling of
the measles virus genome, the short fragments of the cells' own RNA and DNA molecules (that
actually are present) lack far more than half of the molecular sequences that are supposed to
represent the whole virus. Some of these are artificially created biochemically and the rest are
simply made up.

Fig. 2.
Those Chinese scientists who now claim that the majority of the nucleic acids from which the
genome of the new Covid-19 virus was constructed originated from poisonous snakes are, like all of
us, victims of an erroneous scientific development that is now global. The more "viral" genome
strands that are invented, the more similarities with everything that is there are "found." A method
lies behind this error. Large parts of our academic science work like this: you invent a theory, move
within this theory, call it science and claim that it represents reality. In reality, it only represents
what had already previously been thought up.

The Virus Tests

Due to the lack of control experiments, those researchers involved have failed to notice that all test
methods for "viruses" always test a certain number of people "positive", depending on how sensitive
the test method is. The templates required for the supposed detection of "viruses" do not come
from "viruses", but from the tissues, cells and fetal serum (blood without solid components) of
animals, mainly monkeys and cattle.

Since these animals are biochemically very similar to humans, it is clear that their components,
which are misinterpreted as components of viruses, can be detected in all humans using the "virus
test method". Some "viruses" and their "vaccines" actually come from aborted human fetuses. It is
particularly striking here that the test methods detect molecules that occur in every human being
and that the vaccines can trigger particularly dangerous allergic reactions, which are defined as
"autoimmune diseases".

The fetal serum, which is extracted in an extremely cruel manner from non-anaesthetised fetuses
and their non-anaesthetised mothers, and without which the tissues and cells do not grow quickly
enough in the laboratory, is especially highly contaminated. It contains all conceivable known and
unknown microbes, their spores, and a large number of unknown proteins. From this source too - in
addition to animal cells – are the components obtained which are then mentally assigned to a virus
model that does not really exist and that has never been identified as a whole "virus" in the entire
"scientific" literature.

Since the vaccines themselves are also obtained exclusively from these substances, it is
understandable why particularly vaccinated people tend to test "positive" for all "viruses" that in
reality were merely conjured up in the minds and models of researchers and based on which
"vaccines" have been and continue to be introduced. These test methods merely detect the animal-
derived proteins and nucleic acids which often happen to be very similar or identical to human
proteins and nucleic acids. For this reason, the virus test methods do not detect anything specific,
certainly nothing "viral", and therefore yield no meaningful results. What they do achieve, such as
with Ebola, HIV, influenza & Co, is a debilitating, sometimes fatal shock to the body, and a more or
less dangerous, sometimes fatal misuse.

It is important to mention that all so-called virus test methods never say "yes" or "no", but are
calibrated so that they are only rated as "positive" beyond a certain concentration threshold. Thus,
depending on the calibration of the test method, one can arbitrarily test a few, many, none or all
test subjects "positive". When one realizes that otherwise "normal" symptoms may be diagnosed as
AIDS, flu, SARS, measles, etc., once a "positive" test result is received, the true extent of this
deception becomes clear.
 Decisive Details

Before 1952, virologists believed that a virus was a toxic protein or enzyme that was directly
poisonous and somehow propagated by the body, and that it spread in the body, between people
and between animals. Medicine and science had abandoned this idea by 1951 because the
suspected viruses were never seen in an electron microscope and, above all, no control experiments
were carried out. It was recognized that the decay of healthy animals, organs and tissues produces
the same decay products that were formerly referred to as "viruses". Virology had refuted itself and
had given up.

When the wife of the later Nobel laureate Francis Crick sketched out a double helix in 1953 and this
drawing ended up being published in the famous science magazine Nature as an allegedly
scientifically developed model of genetic material (which at the time was still in the concept stage),
it was the dawning of a new and far-reaching hype, namely, the so-called molecular genetics. From
now on, the causes of diseases were sought in genes. The idea of a virus changed and, virtually
overnight, a virus was no longer a toxin, but a dangerous sequence of genetic code, a dangerous
hereditary substance, a dangerous viral genome. It was young chemists who founded the new
discipline of gene virology. These chemists had no idea about biology and medicine but had access
to vast research funding. They were also unaware that the old virology had been given up.

For 2000 years the old proverb still rings true: for they know not what they do. Since 1995, when we
asked the question of evidence and published the answers, there has been a clear addition: because
they cannot admit that what they have learned and practiced is incorrect and, moreover, a threat to
human health. Because no one has had the broad overview and the courage to speak the truth up to
now, more and more supplementary hypotheses à la "immune system" or "epigenetics" are
developing in order - as Goethe pointed out in his day - to prop up the invented, unrealistic theories.

Thus, from the reasoning of the old disease-poison cell theory (note: poison = "virus" in Latin), which
was raised to the status of dogma in 1858, the idea of undefined viruses was first derived. Then the
idea of pathogenic bacteria, then bacterial toxins, then of toxin-viruses until even that idea was
abandoned in 1952. From 1953, the disease-poison idea of Virchow became the idea of gene-
viruses; from this the idea of cancer genes which inspired the "war against cancer" (coined by U.S
president Richard Nixon), and later the idea that genes were responsible for any and all possible
conditions. All theories concerning genes were completely and comprehensively refuted in 2000
with the publication of the contradicting data of the so-called human genome project and the
embarrassing claim that the entire human genome had been read, even though more than half had
to be invented.

To date, the general population is not aware that it is very difficult for the academics involved to
admit their own participation in such seriously misguided series of developments in the name of
science.

The Apparent "Eaters" of Bacteria

The model for the idea of gene viruses in humans, animals and plants, which developed from 1953,
were the so-called bacteria eaters, called "phages", which had been noticed since 1915. From 1938,
when commercially available electron microscopes began to see widespread use in research, these
phages could be photographed, isolated as whole particles, and all of their constituents could be
determined and characterized biochemically in one fell swoop. This procedure of concentrating the
particles and separating them from all other constituents (= isolation), photographing them
immediately afterwards in an isolated state, and characterizing all of their constituents in one fell
swoop, has never been successfully carried out for the alleged viruses of humans, animals and
plants, because they do not exist.

The bacteria and phage researchers, on the other hand, who worked with actually existing
structures, provided the model of what human, animal and plant viruses could look like. When
interpreting the phages as bacteria-eaters, however, the "phage specialists" failed to recognise that
the phenomenon of the formation of these particles is an effect of extreme inbreeding in bacteria.
This effect of the formation and release of phages (bacteria eaters, also known as bacterial viruses)
does not exist in natural bacteria that are freshly obtained from organisms or the environment. Once
their nutrient solution starts to become unavailable or their living conditions become otherwise
untenable, normal bacteria respond by forming the well-known structures of survival called
"spores", which can survive for long periods of time or even indefinitely. New bacteria automatically
arise from these spores once the conditions required for life are restored.

If, on the other hand, bacteria that have previously been artificially separated are constantly
multiplying, they gradually lose all of their properties and abilities. However, many of them aren’t
automatically killed off in this inbreeding process and instead transform suddenly and completely
into particles that are misinterpreted as bacteria-eating phages from the perspective of the
predominant "good-evil" worldview. In reality, however, bacteria actually arise from these "phages"
and morph back into this form if their living conditions are suddenly and drastically compromised.
Günther Enderlein (1872-1968) described exactly these processes of the emergence of bacteria from
invisible structures, their further development to more complex forms, and their reversion back
again into these forms. For these reasons, he rejected the cell theory which holds that life is only
made up of and organised as cells. As a young student, I myself isolated such a "phage" structure
from sea algae and believed at the time that I had discovered the first harmless virus and the first
stable "virus host system."

The idea that there are bacteria as single, viable organisms that can exist on their own without other
living things is incorrect. In isolated form, they inevitably die after a certain time. Researchers have
not noticed this because, after successful "isolation" of a bacterium, part of it is frozen and can be
used for decades. The type concept of bacteria, the idea that these alone are viable and
independent living things, is a laboratory artefact and a misinterpretation.

The claim that bacteria are immortal is therefore untrue. Bacteria are immortal only in symbiosis
with many other bacteria, fungi and probably many more unknown life forms which are difficult to
classify, e.g. the amoeba. Amoebas, bacteria and fungi form spores as soon as the living conditions
no longer exist and re-emerge again as soon as the living conditions reappear. If you compare this
with us humans, the same view results: Without a living environment, nothing works.

But it goes deeper. It’s not only this flamboyant concept that is now dissolving, but also the idea and
the assertion behind the apparent fact of inanimate, dead matter. Observations and conclusions
about an animated, "active matter" (as physicists call it) have been dismissed as unscientific vitalism.
But there are many indications that all elements, which the "prevailing opinion" of "science" does
not attribute any possible living properties, develop from the membrane substance of water, the
original substance of life. From the elements the nucleic acids emerge and from these, in turn,
biological life in the form of amoebas, bacteria, tardigrade and increasingly complex organisms. Two
very clear insights come to light from this view. One of them can be observed by everyone in
themselves and others, namely that biological life in the form of our body is a materialization of
units of consciousness.

These can be named specifically, and the very specific interactions and changes in our organs and
psyche, even based on pure information, e.g. a hurtful or redeeming comment, are understandable,
verifiable in oneself and in others, and allow predictability. This fulfils the three criteria of science.
This realisation, the knowledge of these connections, frees us from the fear-filled and fear-triggering
good-evil mindset and the behavioural responses based on it. With these illuminating scientific
findings, the phenomena of illness, recovery, healing crises, interruptions in healing, as well as the
consequent phenomenon of successive illnesses known as contagion in the old world view, are
clarified. Virus, you are dismissed.

The nightmare of materialistic scientists - that even apparently inanimate matter contains life -
seems to be true. This vitalism, according to which there is an inherent life force present in
everything, was combated by the post-Socratic Greek philosophers Democritus and Epicurus, as well
as the enlightenment thinkers that called upon and legitimized them. This was done with the explicit
justification of once and for all curtailing the misuse of faith and preventing its re-emergence. So far
so good. However, through their disregarding of consciousness, spirit and their mechanisms as
empirically unmeasurable, the Enlightenment thinkers inadvertently turned themselves into the
destroyers of life and the mortal enemy of humanity. At the same time, they adopted the historically
developed "good" / "bad" assumptions of philosophers, state teachers and religions into their
materialistic worldview.

Because of the constant pressure for returns and its fatal consequences, which Silvio Gesell
discovered in general and which Ivan Illich described in the field of medicine, these assumptions
concerning what constitutes "good" and "bad" are constantly and automatically escalating. The
consequences of the pressure inherent in our monetary system towards ever-increasing, constant
growth, which generates cyclical catastrophes, increasingly powerful winners paralleled by ever-
increasing impoverishment, are interpreted by all those who do not recognise the mathematically
determined mechanisms behind the monetary system as proof of the existence of an independent
principle of evil. In the same way, those on the winning side see their mathematically inevitably
generated profit as proof of their divine blessing or unique providence. This not only became the
basis of Manichaeism but was and is the driving force behind the dangerous aspects and effects of
industrialization, as Max Weber and others have recognized.

Revival of Virology by the Nobel Prize Winner John Franklin Enders

From 2014 onwards we presented in the magazine WissenschafftPlus the larger framework of the
faulty development of biology and medicine, namely the persistent dogma of the so-called cell
theory, according to which the body physiologically develops from cells and not from tissues. The
cell theory of life, founded by Rudolf Virchow in 1858 under the name "cellular pathology", which is
still the exclusive basis of biology and medicine, states that all diseases (like all life) arise from a
single degenerating cell and a disease-poison (Latin: virus) that would form as a result. Two crucial
things were the prerequisite and the basis of today's global acceptance of cellular pathology, from
which the theories of infection, genes, cancer, and immunity have inevitably developed:

a) Cell theory was only able to assert itself because Rudolf Virchow suppressed decisive
knowledge concerning tissue. The knowledge and insights into the structure, function and
central importance of tissues in the development and visualization of life, which were known
 in 1858, fundamentally refute cellular theory and the resulting genetic, immune and cancer
theories that have grown out of it.
b) The theories of infection could only be established as a global dogma through the concrete
politics and eugenics of the Third Reich. Before 1933, scientists dared to contradict these
theories; after 1933, these critical scientists were persecuted.

In order to work with "viruses" and to carry out apparent attempts at infection, the "virologists"
were forced to liquefy and filter "sick" and decaying tissues until virology was given up in 1952. The
concentrated filtrate, they believed, contained a disease-poison, a toxin that was constantly
produced by infected cells. Until 1952, "virus" was defined as a disease-poison in the form of a
protein, which, as an enzyme, causes damage in an unknown way that can cause and transmit
disease. The idea of a virus after 1953, the year of the announcement of an alleged genetic material
in the form of an alleged alpha-helix structure, was a malignant genetic substance surrounded by a
shell of proteins. So from 1952 to 1954 there was a paradigm shift regarding the conceptual
understanding of what a virus ought to be.

"Infection experiments" with animals were carried out with the filtered liquids of decaying organs or
liquids that supposedly contained the proteins / enzymes that were supposed to represent the virus.
The results were supposed to prove that a virus is present and is causing the disease that has been
attributed to it. However, what is never mentioned in public is that the symptoms attributed to the
virus could never be produced in humans in animal experiments, but always merely "similar"
symptoms. These similar symptoms are equated with human disease. Nothing is proven here in any
way that qualifies as science.

In the case of these "infection experiments", the control experiments are still missing to this day. In
other words, the evidence that the symptoms generated are not caused by the "treatment" involved
in the procedure of the so-called "infection experiment", but by a virus. In order to rule out the
possibility that the putrescent liquid from the decaying tissue is responsible for the symptoms
observed in the animal tests, one would have had to do exactly the same thing, only with sterilized
or other non-putrescent fluids. However, that never happened. To this day, extremely cruel animal
experiments are carried out in which, to prove the transferability of measles, for example, monkeys
that have been secured in a vacuum chamber have these supposedly infectious fluids introduced
into their trachea and lungs via tubes entering the nostrils. The same damage and corresponding
symptoms would also be caused with sterile saline, sterilized blood, pus or saliva. Nevertheless,
these symptoms, which are only "similar" to those associated with measles, are equated with
measles.

Since the supposedly infectious fluids were pressed through a supposedly bacteria-proof filters
and/or heated slightly, the scientists claimed that the suffering and death of the animals in the
infection experiment cannot be caused by bacteria, but by smaller pathogens, the viruses. The
researchers ignored the facts already known at the time, namely that there are extremely many
more unknown bacteria than known ones, and that a large number of bacteria are heat-resistant
and that they form spores that cannot be filtered. It is important to mention that there is also no
evidence that bacteria cause diseases. They are often involved in disease processes, but only in the
same sense as the fire brigade is involved in extinguishing a fire. They are not the cause, but rather
components of biologically meaningful repair processes. As apparent evidence for the supposed
detrimental role of bacteria, there are only - as with the viruses - senseless and extremely cruel
animal experiments, which again all share the common trait of lacking control experiments.
 Enders and Polio

Up until 1949 "virologists" had been multiplying their suspected protein viruses by placing a piece of
decaying material that had been taken from a "virus-infected" tissue on a disc of "healthy" tissue of
the same type. The visible spread of decay, which passed from the "sick" tissue to the "healthy"
tissue, was misinterpreted as the multiplication and spread of the virus, the disease-poison. Through
the control tests carried out for the first time in 1951, the virologists of the time recognized that this
was a completely normal process of decay and not a virus that would only occur in "diseased" tissue.

In 1941, by chance, Enders discovered - because he had no fresh "healthy" nerve tissue - that tissue
other than nerve tissue also decayed when a piece of the brain of a person who had died of "polio"
was put on it. Until then, the virologists believed that each virus could only multiply in the material
in which it was supposed to cause its damage. On June 10, 1954, Enders and the other scholars
involved received the Nobel Prize in Medicine for the supposed discovery that "viruses" also
reproduce in other tissues that do not damage them in living people.

From that point on, the alleged "polio virus" was multiplied by mixing fetal human skin and fetal
human muscle tissue with pieces of brain from people who had died of "polio" and allowing these
reagents to decay together. The filtrate from this was considered to contain viruses. The famous
Jonas Salk took on exactly this idea without naming its originator. Salk employed the filtrate of
decayed fetal human skin and muscles as his polio vaccine, the New York Times claimed that the
vaccine was effective and safe, and Salk generated millions of profits from the polio vaccine. Without
involving the inventors of the idea of decaying human fetuses.

For these reasons, Enders worked hard to develop another technique for which he could claim rights
from the start. He plunged into the second-most lucrative area of infection theory, namely the
symptomatology that was defined as measles. Enders transferred the idea and methods from
bacteriology (in which he did his doctorate) and believed that phages were the viruses of the
bacteria.

Analogous to the technique of demonstrating the apparently bacteria-killing effect of phages on a

bacterial lawn (Petri dish: gelatin coated with bacteria that contains bacterial nutrients), he
developed a tissue smear on which a supposedly infectious liquid was applied. Analogous to the
death of the bacteria, the death of the tissue smear was equated with the presence of the suspected
measles virus, its proof of existence, its isolation, and its multiplication. Exactly this protocol is still
used today for measles and with only a minor modification to "detect" all pathogenic viruses. The
mixture of dead tissues / cells is called a live vaccine. If individual components of dead tissue or
synthetically produced molecules are used in the vaccine, the profession speaks of dead vaccines.

Since Enders attributed the drastically increased number of deaths and injuries caused by the Salk
polio vaccine to contamination of the polio vaccine with unknown human viruses - which the equally
fact-free good-evil theorists of the alternative sphere refer to in their claims about biological
weapons - he worked with tissues from monkey kidneys and fetal serum (blood without solid
components) from horse and cattle fetuses.

There are four striking and decisive differences between the detection of the real phages of the
bacteria and the supposed detection of the only suspected "viruses" in humans and animals by
Enders. These differences illustrate the false assumptions of Enders, which, because of his Nobel
Prize yet despite his own very clearly formulated doubts, now have the whole medical establishment
and therefore the whole world (note the Corona-panic) going ballistic. These four differences are:
 1. The phages of the bacteria are actually isolated in the true sense of the word using standard
methods (density gradient centrifugation). Immediately after isolation, they are
photographed in an electron microscope, their purity is determined, and their constituents,
the manageable number of proteins and the piece of genetic material contained, are shown
biochemically in one step and all together.
2. In the case of all "viruses" relating to humans, animals and plants, no virus has ever been
isolated, photographed in isolated form and its constituents all at once shown biochemically
within the same procedure. What has happened instead is that in a consensus-building
process over the years, individual components of the dead cells have merely been
conceptually assigned to a virus model. In this interpretative process, the demonstrable and
recognizable phages served as the starting point for the first "virus" models.
3. The tissues and cells used for the "detection and propagation" of the "viruses" are pre-
treated in a very special way before proceeding with the supposed "infection" experiment.
They are deprived of 80% of their nutrients so that they get hungry and increase their
uptake of the supposed viruses. They are then treated with antibiotics to rule out bacteria,
which are always and everywhere present in all tissues and sera, as a cause of cell and tissue
death. It was only in 1972 that biochemists recognized that antibiotics used independently
actually damage and kill cells without having been noticed or taken into account by
virologists. It is precisely the factors "starvation" and "poisoning" that lead to the visible
death of the cells, which has been and is still to this day misinterpreted as the presence,
isolation, effect and multiplication of the suspected "virus".
4. The control tests that are mandatory in science and whose purpose should be to rule out the
misinterpretation of typical cell components as viruses have not been carried out to date.
On the other hand, these control experiments had been carried out through the detection,
isolation, biochemical and electron microscopic characterization of the bacterial phages.

In this way, and with the help of the prestige of his "Human Fetus / Polio Virus Vaccine" Nobel Prize
of December 10, 1954, Enders' spurious speculations of June 1, 1954 for "possible evidence" of "an
agent" that "might play a role" in measles morphed into a supposedly "scientific" fact which became
the exclusive foundation of all new genetic virology after 1952. A few months after his Nobel Prize,
he either forgot about or suppressed the contradictions and doubts presented in his own 1954
publication. Suffering from Jonas Salk's theft of ideas for the polio vaccine, he was going to make
sure that all future developments of a measles vaccine would be based on his technique.

Because Enders mixed a sample from the ill 11-year-old boy David Edmonston into his dying tissue
culture (due to the lack of control attempts, a key argument in the battle against forced measles
vaccination!), the original cell culture for the measles "virus" and the corresponding measles vaccine
(the toxic sum of all the dead and dying cell components) are to this day referred to as the
"Edmonston strain". Part of this mixture of unintentionally killed monkey tissue and fetal bovine
serum was frozen in order to continually produce "measles viruses" and "live vaccine" by
"inoculating" dying tissue / cell cultures.

The consequences of the Measles Virus case

The decisive reports, minutes and judgments of the measles virus process (2014-2017), to which I
refer below, are freely available on the Internet at www.wissenschafftplus.de. Further reports and
refutations of the measles virus allegations, which the courts did not take into account, were
published in various issues of the WissenschafftPlus magazine from 2014 to 2017.
The motivation behind beginning the measles virus process, which originated in 2011, was as a
means to confront the measles vaccination requirement which had already been made mandatory
by that time. A former federal justice minister called me and asked for current evidence to prevent
the planned measles vaccination. A senior attorney general advised me to formulate contests in such
a way as to trigger a judicial process in civil law concerning scientific evidence for the alleged
existence of viruses and the alleged safety and effectiveness of vaccines. This has since then been
fully accomplished. Upon understanding how it came to be that the publication by John Franklin
Enders of June 1st, 1954 became the sole and exclusive basis for the new viral gene theory, which
remains the basis of "live virus" vaccine production since the old virus-poison idea had been
abandoned in 1951, this result comes as no surprise.

Since I knew that the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) had, contrary to its legal mandate, not published a
single publication on the alleged existence of the measles virus, I specified in the conditions of the
reward offer that only scientific publications by the RKI would be recognised as valid evidence for
the existence of the measles virus. A young medical doctor from Saarland presented me with six
publications, none of which were of the RKI: Enders' paper of June 1, 1954 and five others that all
rely exclusively on the Enders paper, including the only comprehensive review paper of the measles
virus. This "review" describes in detail the decades-long, tedious process of finding a consensus
concerning which components of dying tissue were to be attributed to the measles virus model and
how the measles virus model had to constantly be changed.

To the young doctor, who strongly recommended that I refrain from the laborious "legal discussion"
process in order to pay him the short-term prize money, I replied that in none of the publications put
forward by himself as evidence are viral structures presented, but merely typical cell components.
He then brought a legal action before the district court in Ravensburg, to which he never presented
the six publications. The Ravensburg court ruled against me without even having the six publications
in question at hand; it was proven that they were not in the court case file. Besides this, the
Ravensburg Regional Court issued its ruling under more than unusual circumstances.

During the questioning by the presiding judge in the appeal hearing at the Stuttgart Higher Regional
Court, the plaintiff admitted that he had not read the six publications in question himself. He was
therefore counting on me and my refutation of vaccination to be eliminated through the "tedious
legal battle". Perhaps he had himself become a victim of the misconception of viruses because he
apparently trusted his study colleagues, who had not recognized the erroneous development of
medicine since 1858 and who did not want to delve into its history when checking their assumptions.
In this way he ended up as both the victim and perpetuator of the fatal belief in the viral infection
theories and vaccination programs.

It’s quite believable that the applicant neglected to read the six publications he presented to me. He
at least didn’t choose them himself, because they are precisely those only publications in the entire
field of approximately 30,000 peer-reviewed scientific articles on "measles" in which reference is
made to the existence of the measles virus. But the rest of these papers also all assume, "a priori"
and from the outset, the existence of the measles virus and ultimately rely exclusively upon
references to the so-called "evidence" of Enders from June 1st, 1954.

The district court of Ravensburg (LG RV) decided in 2014 to rule in favour of the doctor, who had in
the meantime earned a doctorate, and decided that the prize money should be paid out despite the
fact that no publication from the RKI had been submitted. In addition, the LG RV decided that it was
not necessary for the scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus to be limited to one
publication. Instead, the court decided, the required evidence which had been defined in the reward
announcement could also be satisfied by the sum total of 3366 publications (the total of those
papers cited within the six publications) published between 1954 and 2007.

The court-appointed expert Prof. Dr. Podbielski from Rostock argued (or the regional court amended
its original decision in 2014 in anticipation of the expert opinion) as follows: "I have to clarify that,
concerning the terminology, it is simply not possible in biology to provide evidence in the classic
sense, such as in mathematics or physics. In biology, from the outset, only evidence which at some
point in its application has demonstrated practical evidential value may be regarded as such."

Building on this extremely unscientific claim, which arises from the tension between Podbielski's
need for proof and the contradiction of his belief (the basis of his legitimacy), something emerges
that behaviourists define as displacement activity. He invents an excuse that arises from this
unwillingness to confront the realisation that biology and the medicine based on it, vaccination, etc.,
are unscientific and unprovable: only an assemblage of evidence can "at some point" and
"somehow" (= practical) achieve evidential value. Such a clear admission of not only the practical but
also the formal unscientific nature of modern biology and medicine had never before been put on
paper.

It is now a matter of applying and acting on this evidence of the plainly unscientific basis and
consequent illegality of the claims about infection and vaccination being made, which have in turn
been used to justify infringements on our fundamental human rights and personal liberties. We
must aim to meaningfully oppose the mandatory measles vaccination that has been legally effective
in Germany since February 13, 2020 and comes into force on March 1, 2020. Information concerning
this can be found in our newsletter.