Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Aronson, E., & Goode, E. (1980). Training teachers to implement jigsaw learning: A manual for teachers. In S. Sharan, P. Hare, C. Webb,
and R. Hertz-Lazarowitz (Eds.), Cooperation in Education (pp. 47-81). Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press.
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley
Longman.
Clarke, J. (1994). Pieces of the puzzle: The jigsaw method. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport CT:
Greenwood Press.
Muskingum College - Center for Advancement and Learning (CAL). (n.d.). Retrieved 2008, February 15, from
http://www.muskingum.edu/~cal/database/general/attention4.html. Retrieved on: March 14, 2020.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning in teams: State of the art. Educational Psychologist, 15, 93-111.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Tierney, R. (1995) Reading
Strategies and Practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Objectives:
The students will be able to examine
historical documents and pictures;
discuss and exchange thoughts with
their peers and;
to create conclusions from the
evidences that they examined.
Presentation Plan Assessment Strategies
1. Preparing the Station Boards DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT
Select 5 to 6 questions (depending on the class size) that cover the Misconception check. Present the students with
topic. Select pictures, historical text/documents, quotations that common misconception about a concept
might be included in each question. For maximum participation, regarding the topic. Ask them if they agree or
students may be allowed to prepare the station boards with the disagree
teacher’s guidance on what might they include in their board.
2. Group the students according to how many station boards are
prepared.
3. Display the station boards around the classroom. Make sure that it is
labeled with its station number and it should be displayed in a FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
“gallery style” that allows the students to be dispersed around the Introspection. Ask students about their feelings for
classroom to reduce crowding. Stations boards may be hung on the topic or making the questions personalize like “if
walls or placed on tables. you were there during that time…”
4. Explore the Station Boards. Each group will start at a different station. Peer instruction. Let the students teach or explain
At the first station, groups will read what is posted and one recorder concept. It teacher learning responsibility,
should write the group’s responses, thoughts and comments in a communication, organization and leadership skills
post-it note to be posted in the station boards as feedback. For to the students.
individual student accountability, they may also record their own
responses on their notebook or worksheet. SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
5. Rotate. After 3-5 minutes, have the groups rotate from the next Unit Test. Assesses the over-all competencies of the
station. Students read and discuss the previous group’s response students.
and add content to their own. Repeat until all groups visited each
station.
6. Monitor. As the facilitator, circulate around the station, clarify
questions, gauge student understanding, and address
misconceptions. Write down misconceptions and lapses that
students encountered and address these problems before the end
of exercise or when it’s time to debrief the activity.
7. Debrief the Gallery Walk. Discuss problems or misconceptions that
students encountered. Students are also asked to share information
that they collected in each stations and to draw conclusions from
what they learned.
References
https://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/gallerywalk/what.html. Retrieved on: March 28, 2020
Objectives:
The students will be able to freely
react to a stimuli they have seen,
watched or heard;
to be able to handle their emotional
intelligence after reading, observing
or watching;
to share their thoughts and emotions
regarding the topic.
Presentation Plan Assessment Strategies
1. Choose a text, image or video that you expect students will find FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
engaging and will want to discuss after reading or watching. Exit Tickets. It is a simple yet effective formative
2. After reading, watching or observing the stimulus, ask the students to assessment technique that allows the students to
identify the following: deposit small pieces of paper or index cards with
1 Surprising Fact or Idea an accurate interpretation of the main idea of the
1 Interesting Fact or Idea topic.
1 Troubling Fact or Idea SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
3. Give students an opportunity to share and debrief their S-I-T Info-graphic. Create a graphic presentation with
responses, either in pairs or as a class discussion. Or collect their facts about the events happened in World War II. It
responses and read them to find out how students are feeling about should be eye-capturing and cultivates a sense of
and understanding the material presented in class awareness about the harmful effects of war on
viewers.
References
https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/teaching-strategies/s-i-t-surprising-interesting-troubling. Retrieved on: April 14, 2020
Prepared by: