Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
METHODOLOGY
Prepared by :
Afrah Mahmood & Raghad Qaydar
1
Methodology
A seminar on:
Course Instructor:
Dr. Omar Ilyas
Prepared by:
Raghad Qaydar
Contents:
* Grammar-Translation Method
* Direct Method
Week 3
2
Once it was called the classical method as it was used firstly in the
teaching of the classical languages, Latin and Greek. The heritage of
language was written in Latin. Also It was the principal language of
commerce and politics. That is why they needed to learn Latin. GTM
method was invented to teach this language. But this method was
unsatisfactory; therefore it failed and another methods appeared after
that although it was the corner stone of teaching language.
This method involves teaching the target language through analysis of its
grammar rules and translating sentences and texts of the target
language into native language. It depends on memorizing rules in order
to learn morphology and syntax of the foreign language. Thus, the native
language is considered the reference system to acquire the foreign
language.
1_ grammatical rules.
3_ translations of texts.
3_ Translation each language into the other is one of its important goal.
If students can translate from one language into another, they are
considered successful language learners.
1_ Reading passage:
2_ Cognates:
4_ Antonyms/Synonyms:
6_ Fill-in-the-blanks exercise:
Students are given a number of sentences with words missing and are
asked to fill each blank with new vocabulary items or items of a
particular grammar type, such as prepositions or verbs with different
tenses.
7_ Memorization:
9_ Composition:
Q_ How is it structural?
There is no literature about it but the advocates of the GTM believed in
a concept which is the universality of grammar. They believe that
grammar is universal in the sense that grammar is applicable in all
languages, so we have grammar which is universal for all languages and
what is going to be different then is only words. Now when I talk about
grammar, I am talking about patterns of sentences, for example when
we say "he is nice" which is subject + verb+ complement(which is
adjective), they believe that this pattern is universal but what is going to
be different is the words of each language and this is why they believe if
you want to learn a language, you only have to translate from and into
that language. Grammar is universal, you are only going to substitute
words from English to Arabic and Arabic to English and this is how you
are going to learn a language and this is not correct. I do agree that
grammar is universal in the sense that each language has its own
grammar, each language in the world has grammar, but what differ is it
has its own grammar and you can't apply the grammatical rules or the
grammatical patterns of English, Latin, Greek, Hindi, Arabic into another
language and this is when they went wrong . This is the idea or the
theory underlying the GTM.
8
1_ Demonstration
3- Pantomime
_ and the information about the daily lives of the speakers of the foreign
language.
7_ The teacher directs the class activities. The teacher and students are
partners in the teaching – learning process. The purpose of language
learning is communication; therefore, students ask and answer
questions. If the student's answer is incorrect, the teacher tries not to
correct the answer, but to get students to self-correct whenever
possible.
1- Small classes.
2- Individual attention.
1_ Reading aloud:
Students are asked questions and answer in full sentences in the target
language, so that they practise new words and grammatical structures.
4_ Conversation practice:
The teacher asks students questions in the target language which they
have to answer correctly.
5_ Fill-in-the-blanks exercise:
Students are given a number of sentences with missing items and are
asked to fill each blank with items of a particular grammar structure. The
students have to induce the grammar rule that they need to fill the
blanks from examples given at earlier parts of the lesson.
6_ Dictation:
- At the first time, he reads it at normal speed while the students just
listen.
- At the second time, he pauses at the end of each sentence in order that
the students write what they have heard.
- At the third time, he reads it at normal speed while the students check
their writings.
7_ Map drawing:
8_ Paragraph writing:
The teacher can ask the students to write a paragraph by using their own
words on a certain topic. They can do this from memory or by using a
relating reading passage as a model.
When the GTM neglected the speaking and listening, the DM tried to
concentrate on speaking and listening. The question here is:
References:
Methodology
A seminar on:
Course instructor
Prepared & to be presented by Afrah Mahmood
Introduction
The increased attention given to foreign language teaching in the U.S
in the 1950s , led to the emergence of the Audio-Lingual
Method(ALM).(Richards&Rodgers,2010:53).After the World War II
America became an international power, so thousands of students entered
the U.S to study in universities and many of them required training in
English before starting their studies. So America felt the need to teach
foreign languages in order not to be isolated from scientific advances in
other countries. The language was taught by given systematic attention to
pronunciation, and by intensive oral drilling of its basic patterns with
none of the grammar and translation found in traditional methods. It is
also known as the “army method” and as the “Michigan method” as it
was developed by Fries at Michigan University.(Brown,2001:22-23)
Design
In this method a complete reorientation of the foreign language
curriculum is demanded .like when the nineteenth-century reformers
support a return to speech-based instruction with the primary objective of
oral proficiency and dismissed the study of grammar or literature as the
goal of foreign language teaching.(Richards&Rodgers,2010:58)
Objectives
According to Brook there are two types of objectives:
The syllabus
Audio-lingual Method is Linguistic approach to language
teaching.Its syllabus contains key items of phonology, morphonology,
and syntax arranged according to their presentation .So the order of
the skills which are taught is that of listening,speaking,reading and
writing. At first language may be presented only orally.Later when
reading and writing are introduced, students are taught to read what
they have already learned to say orally.(Richards and
Rodgers,2010:59)
•To help students to overcome the habits of their native language and
to form new ones in the target language by using only the target
language in the classroom.Learning process is similar to the
acquisition of the native language.(Larsen & Anderson,2011)
Theory of Language
By the 1930s,the scientific approach to the study of language was
thought to consist of collecting examples of what speakers said and
analysing them according to different levels of structural organization
rather than according to categories of Latin grammar.(Richards &
rodgers,2010:54)
drool and get a habit. So the stimulus is the bell, the food was the
reinforcement and the drooling is the response. This is called
conditioning. So this theory is adopted by the ALM and they say that
if you have a stimulus, you will get a response with reinforcement, a
stimulus would be learning the language through the teacher, the
response is imitation, and the feedback we are going to talk about it
later. So they thought that Learning a language is a behavior, it is a
behavior just like any other human behavior and it can be modified.
So this extensive practice of the conditioner theory or behaviorist
theory would make this drooling, for example, a habit, it is automatic
with certain stimuli. So the ALM advocates assume that with
imitation, extensive practice, repetition over and over again, the
language since it is a behavior, it would be a habit.
Q/ What is a habit?
Comparison:
1_ Theories underlying these methods of teaching
-Although they were used for many years to teach foreign languages
and each one had its own advantages that made it spread and widely
used ,yet each had certain disadvantages that made it fail and cause
another method to appear. GTM, for example, failed because of the
following reasons:
If you think about it from the perspective of use and usage: it is about
usage not use. If you think about the competence: it is about the
linguistic competence not performance. If you think about it from utility,
it is about accuracy not about appropriacy and so many dichotomies. But
the main idea behind its failure is that it did not concentrate on
communication.
its own grammar and you can't apply the rules of one language into
another.
3_ The third reason and the most important one is about translation.
The GTM used translation as a tool for teaching while translation is not a
tool for teaching, translation is a skill that you acquire after learning
both languages. You have to be competent in both languages not to use
it to learn, but to acquire this skill after learning the foreign language.
• Although ALM gained popularity for years yet it failed to continue. One
of several reasons is that it viewed the learner as a passive entity .It
dismissed the possibility that learners can add any useful contribution
from their mind to the learning process, when it prevented them from
committing mistakes and using only the correct forms of language and it
is one of the drawbacks of ALM . This is in contrast to many theorists
beliefs that to acquire a new language it is preferable to let the learners
making errors. The other point is that ALM failed to teach long-term
communicative aspects as the structural linguistics tell us only a part of
what we want to know about certain language .ALM should provide a
good model and this is one of the difficulties.
communion” .Each one of them has many linguistic forms to express the
same phatic communion. For example “greetings” they would be
accustom to one way of achieving greeting.What is going on in the
classroom in ALM is that they stick to only one and this is a criticism to
the situational curriculum. It is restricting and restricted. It is restricted
because we have roles, the customer, the waiter, the restaurant
manager and each one of them is going to play his role with certain
expressions. You cannot get all the expressions in one situation .
Although situations are very helpful they are socially loaded,culturally
loaded, you have to add to them.(In ALM they didn’t give students the
chance to add to situations)this is mentioned as creativity or the novelty
of the situation.
•In ALM while students keep trying to acquire the target language.
Native language should not be used in the classroom so as to avoid the
possible interference of the habits of the students’ native language with
the target one. This means that no translation is used, they
communicate only in the target language after they induced the
necessary rules from examples.
like, for example , some Arab consider English as disbelievers لغة الكفار
language
On the opposite, we can see people who want to learn language just to
be cool. Both of them are social factors.
Give you a small example: In our society, we respect older people, when
you talk to someone older than you, you say ,for example, "uncle "عمو,
in your mind you are respecting him while according to their social
knows, this is not respect, in the contrary, you are insulting him or
offending him and you are going to have miscommunication, he would
not understand that you are respecting him. So social aspect, cultural
aspect are important in understanding communication or to be
appropriate as far as communication is concern.
Also, culture has a great influence, if you want to learn a language, you
have to know about the culture.
so when you speak your daily life speech, sometimes you would make a
reference taken from a speech of this play. Someone who is American,
he has been studying Arabic for a long time, if you make a hint to this
play which is a part of our cultural structure, he would not really
understand it unless he has seen it. It would make no sense to him what
he is talking about.
5_ Memorization
6_ Deductive vs Inductive
While inductive way implies inferring patterns from examples. This helps
students to think, infer and analyze things critically away from just
memorizing without understanding. This way is followed in DM.
28
• while learning a new language no rules are given at all in ALM and if
they are needed the learners will figure them out from the given
examples.In this way(inductive) rules will be stick in their minds easily.
* Note that we use the word "pattern" not "rule". The word "rule" is not
preferred because this term refers to something fixed and we do not
have a fixed rule in language, we have so many irregularity and
exceptions. Thus, we should use the term "pattern". There are seven
main patterns for sentences. There are unlimited number of sentences
out of one pattern.
7_ Errors correction
• For those who follow ALM, errors are to be avoided from the
beginning as it leads to the formation of bad habits .And if they occur,
they should be immediately corrected by the teacher.
8_ Communication
meanings. If you want to deliver the target / the wanted/ the desired
meaning, you have to be appropriate to understand the different
meanings of these words. According to the context, some words would
mean something in this context, while mean something else in a
different context. this is very important, you have to pay attention when
you teach.
•What happens in ALM is that they missing the social and the cultural
aspects that should be included in teaching . We have linguistic
competence (language knowledge),Communicative competence and an
interactional competence. how you interacts with speaker of English .we
have so many factors to interact. In all of them the learner should be
appropriate .He would understand what is saying , when ,who ,and how
,etc. All these things are missed in the ALM ,but it is much better than
DM ,you can use it in teaching but it is mainly now used in teaching
pronunciation.
•To sum up, we can say that each of the three methods (GTM,DM ,ALM)
achieved its specific goal in a certain period of time and each of
them had its merits and demerits. So it is not a matter of which one is
better than others as each one of them focused on a particular area of
language teaching depending on the theory it followed. It is necessary to
understand that each of them when appeared, it tried to avoid the
difficulties of the previous one to discover later that its theory was also
inadequate to satisfy the learners’ needs. Still you can use these
methods whenever they suit you. Leave the drawbacks and you are
going to enhance the strong points of each method.
30
References: