Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The "value-added tax" has been criticized as the burden of it relies on personal end-
consumers of products.Some critics consider it to be a regressive tax,meaning the poor
pay more, as a percentage of their income, than the rich. Defenders argue that excising
taxation through income is an arbitrary standard, and that the value-added tax is in fact a
proportional tax in that people with higher income pay more at the same rate that they
consume more. The effective progressiveness or regressiveness of a VAT system can also
be affected when different classes of goods are taxed at different rates. To maintain the
progressive nature of total taxes on individuals, countries implementing VAT have
reduced income tax on lower income-earners, as well as instituted direct transfer
payments to lower-income groups, resulting in lower tax burdens on the poor.[4]
Revenues from a value added tax are frequently lower than expected because they are
difficult and costly to administer and collect. In many countries, however, where
collection of personal income taxes and corporate profit taxes has been historically weak,
VAT collection has been more successful than other types of taxes. VAT has become
more important in many jurisdictions as tariff levels have fallen worldwide due to trade
liberalization, as VAT has essentially replaced lost tariff revenues. Whether the costs and
distortions of value added taxes are lower than the economic inefficiencies and
enforcement issues (e.g. smuggling) from high import tariffs is debated, but theory
suggests value added taxes are far more efficient.
Certain industries (small-scale services, for example) tend to have more VAT avoidance,
particularly where cash transactions predominate, and VAT may be criticized for
encouraging this. From the perspective of government, however, VAT may be preferable
because it captures at least some of the value-added. For example, a carpenter may offer
to provide services for cash (i.e. without a receipt, and without VAT) to a homeowner,
who usually cannot claim input VAT back. The homeowner will hence bear lower costs
and the carpenter may be able to avoid other taxes (profit or payroll taxes). The
government, however, may still receive VAT for various other inputs (lumber, paint,
gasoline, tools, etc.) sold to the carpenter, who would be unable to reclaim the VAT on
these inputs (unless of course the carpenter also has at least some jobs done with receipt,
and claims all purchased inputs to go to those jobs). While the total tax receipts may be
lower compared to full compliance, it may not be lower than under other feasible taxation
systems.
Because exports are generally zero-rated (and VAT refunded or offset against other
taxes), this is often where VAT fraud occurs. In Europe, the main source of problems is
called carousel fraud. Large quantities of valuable goods (often microchips or mobile
phones) are transported from one member state to another. During these transactions,
some companies owe VAT, others acquire a right to reclaim VAT. The first companies,
called 'missing traders' go bankrupt without paying. The second group of companies can
'pump' money straight out of the national treasuries.[citation needed] This kind of fraud
originated in the 1970s in the Benelux-countries. Today, the British treasury is a large
victim.[5] There are also similar fraud possibilities inside a country. To avoid this, in some
countries like Sweden, the major owner of a limited company is personally responsible
for taxes. This is circumvented by having an unemployed person without assets as the
formal owner.[citation needed]