Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SMART MATERIALS
James A. Harvey
Under the Bridge Consulting
Corvallis, Oregon
1 INTRODUCTION
The world has recently undergone two materials ages, the plastics age and the
composite age. In the midst of these two ages a new era has developed. This is
the smart materials era. According to early definitions, smart materials are ma-
terials that respond to their environments in a timely manner.1–4
The definition of smart materials has been expanded to materials that receive,
transmit, or process a stimulus and respond by producing a useful effect that
may include a signal that the materials are acting upon it. Some of the stimuli
that may act upon these materials are strain, stress, temperature, chemicals (in-
cluding pH stimuli), electric field, magnetic field, hydrostatic pressure, different
types of radiation, and other forms of stimuli.5
The effect can be caused by an absorption of a proton, of a chemical reaction,
of an integration of a series of events, of a translation or rotation of segments
401
402 SMART MATERIALS
2 PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIALS
The simplest definition of piezoelectric materials can be obtained by first break-
ing the word into piezo and electric. Piezo is from the Greek word piezein that
means to press tightly or squeeze. Combining piezein with electric we have
‘‘squeeze electricity.’’ And that to the first estimation is a very good definition.
The history of piezoelectric materials is relatively simple and only the high-
lights will be presented. In 1880, Pierre and Paul-Jean Curie showed the pie-
zoelectric effect in quartz and Rochelle salt crystals. Their first observations were
made by placing weights on the faces of particular crystal cuts, like the X cut
quartz plate, detecting charges on the crystal surfaces, and demonstrating that
the magnitude of charge was proportional to the applied weight. This phenom-
enon has become to be known as the direct pressure electric piezoelectric effect.
In 1881 G. Lippmann made the prediction that a crystal such as quartz would
develop a mechanical strain when an electric field was applied. In the same year
the Curies reported the converse pressure electric piezoelectric effect with quartz
and Rochelle salt. They showed that if certain crystals were subjected to me-
chanical strain, they became electrically polarized and the degree of polarization
was proportional to the applied strain. The French inventor Langevin developed
the first SONAR, using quartz crystals in 1920. During the 1940s researchers
discovered and developed the first polycrystalline, piezoelectric ceramic, barium
titanate. One of the significant advantages of piezoelectric ceramics over pie-
zoelectric crystals is their ability to be formed in a variety of shapes and sizes.
In 1960, researchers discovered a weak piezoelectric effect in whalebone and
tendon that lead to intense search for other piezoelectric organic materials. And
in 1969, Kawai found very high piezoelectric activity in polarized polyvinylidene
fluoride.7,8
The piezoelectric effect exists in a number of naturally occurring crystals such
as quartz, tourmaline, and sodium potassium tartrate. For a crystal to exhibit the
piezoelectric effect, it must not have a center of symmetry. When a stress (tensile
or compressive) is applied to a crystal with a center of symmetry, it will alter
the spacing between the positive and negative sites in each elementary cell unit,
thus causing a net polarization at the crystal surface. The effect is approximately
linear. The polarization is directly related to the applied stress. It is directional
dependent. Thus, compressive and tensile forces will generate electric fields and
voltages of opposite polarity. The effect is also reciprocal; thus when the crystal
404 SMART MATERIALS
based upon this technology.12,13 In this application the impulse ink jet is produced
using a cylindrical transducer that is tightly bound to the outer surface of a
cylindrical glass nozzle with an orifice ranging from mils to microns in diameter.
In addition to this application several industrious researchers have expanded
upon this technique by using a printer as a chemical delivery system for the
application of doped polymers for organic light-emitting displays. A group of
researchers from Princeton University has used a color ink jet printer based upon
piezoelectric technology with a resolution of 640 dots per line and simply re-
placed the inks with polymer solutions.14 This technique has also been applied
to the manufacture of color filters for liquid-crystal displays.
Another application of the use of piezoelectric polymer film involves the work
of a group of researchers at the Thiokol Company and an earlier work15,16 to
monitor adhesive joints. The study showed that during the bonding process, the
polyvinylidene fluoride piezoelectric film sensors monitored the adhesive cure
ultrasonically and qualitatively determined the presence of significant void con-
tent. The study also indicated that normal bond stresses were quantified during
cyclic loading of single lap joints and electrometric butt joints. The researchers
revealed that this was a significant step toward service life predictions. But, more
and better-understood monitoring techniques are needed.
An interested application of piezoelectric ceramics can be illustrated in the
hundred of vertical pinball machines popular in the Pachinko parlors of Japan.
The machines are assembled with stacks of piezoelectric disks that can act as
both sensors and actuators. When a ball falls on the stack, the force of impact
generates a piezoelectric voltage pulse that in turns generates a response from
the actuator stack through a feedback control system. The stack expands, thus
throwing the ball out of the hole and moving up a spiral ramp through a sequence
of events, and finally repeating the sequence.17
3 ELECTROSTRICTIVE MATERIALS
Piezoelectric materials are materials that exhibit a linear relationship between
electric and mechanical variables. Piezoelectricity is a third-rank tensor. Elec-
trostrictive materials also show a relationship between these two variables. How-
ever, in this case, it is a quadratic relationship between mechanical stress and
the square of electrical polarization. Electrostriction can occur in any material
and is a small effect. One difference between piezoelectric and electrostrictive
materials is the ability of the electrostrictive materials to show a larger effect in
the vicinity of its Curie temperature. Elecrostriction is a fourth-rank tensor prop-
erty observed both in centric and acentric insulators. This is especially true for
ferroelectric materials such as the members of the perovskite family. Ferroelec-
trics are ferroic solids whose domain walls have the capability of moving by
external forces or fields. In addition to ferroelectrics the other principal examples
of ferroic solids are ferromagnetics and ferroelastics, both of which have poten-
tial as smart materials. Other examples of electrostrictive materials include lead
manganese niobate: lead titanate (PMN: PT) and lead lanthanium zirconate ti-
tanate (PLZT).
An interesting application of electrostrictive materials is in active optical ap-
plications. During the Cold War, the satellites that flew over the Soviet Union
used active optic systems to eliminate the atmospheric turbulence effects. Elec-
408 SMART MATERIALS
If the logs are aligned, they flow down the river. If they are disordered, they
will cause a log jam thus clogging up the river. A typical example of an elec-
trorheological fluid is a mixture of corn starch in silicone oil. Another fluid that
has been experimented with as a replacement for the silicone oil has been choc-
olate syrup. Another feature of electrorheological systems is that their damping
characteristics can be changed from flexible to rigid and vice versa. Electro-
rheological fluids were evaluated using a single-link flexible-beam test bed. The
beam was a sandwich configuration with electrorheological fluids distributed
along its length. When the beam was rapidly moved back and forth, the elec-
trorheological fluid was used to provide flexibility during the transient response
period of the maneuver for speed and made rigid at the end point of the ma-
neuver for stability. A practical way of viewing this behavior is to compare it
with fly fishing.5 It has been suggested to use rheological fluids in the construc-
tion of fishing rods and golf clubs.
7 MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL MATERIALS
The magnetorheological materials (fluids) are the magnetic equivalent of elec-
trorheological fluids. These fluids consist of either ferromagnetic or ferrimag-
netic particles that are either dispersed or suspended within; and the applied
stimulus is a magnetic field. A simple magnetorheological fluid consists of iron
powder in motor oil. The Lord Corporation provided a clever demonstration of
magnetorheological fluids. They supplied an interlocking two-plastic-syringe
system filled with a magnetorheological fluid and two small magnets. The fluid
flows freely, without the magnets placed in the middle of the two syringes. With
the two magnets in place, the fluid flow completely stops.
An interesting adaptation of magnetorestrictive fluids is a series of elastomeric
matrix composites embedded with iron particles. During the thermal cure of the
elastomer, a strong magnetic field was applied to align the iron particles into
chains. These chains of iron particles were locked into place within the com-
posite through the cross-linked network of the cured elastomer. If a compressive
force stimulated the composite, it was 60% more resistant to deformation in a
magnetic field. If the composite was subjected to a shear force, its magnetic
field induced modulus was an order of magnitude higher than its modulus in a
zero magnetic field.5,23
A recent well-thought article described attempts to enhance the properties of
epoxies with magnetic fields. The study did show the low conversion rates of
the epoxy with the hardener; economically generated magnetic fields had an
effect on the properties of the final composite. At the high conversion of the
reactants there exists a need to drive the scarce unreacted glycidyl and amine
functionalities together. And only the magnetic fields generated by supercon-
ducting electromagnets are capable of this.24
There continues to be a great deal of research into magnets and magnetism.
A new area of research involves magnetic nanocomposite films. Magnetic par-
ticles exhibit size effects. Below a critical size, magnetic clusters comprise single
domains, whereas with bulk materials there are multiple domains. Nanomagnets
show unusual properties such as superparamagnetism and quantum tunneling of
magnetization. These unique properties of magnetic nanoclusters can lead to
applications in information storage, color imaging, magnetic refrigeration, fer-
9 pH-SENSITIVE MATERIALS 411
rofluids, cell storing, medical diagnosis, and controlled drug delivery. A nano-
composite is considered to be the incorporation of these nanoclusters into
polymeric matrices such as polyaniline.25
8 THERMORESPONSIVE MATERIALS
Amorphous and semicrystalline thermoplastic polymeric materials are unique
due to the presence of a glass transition temperature. At their glass transition
temperatures, the specific volume of polymer and its rate of change changes.
This transition affects a multitude of physical properties. Numerous types of indi-
cating devices could be developed based upon the stimuli-response (temperature-
specific volume) behavior. This chapter contains several examples of this type
of behavior; however, its total impact is beyond the scope of this chapter. To
take advantage of this behavior in product development or material selection it
requires reviewing the necessary requirements in the many polymer references.
A few examples that illustrate thermoresponsive behavior that are a little
unique are being included in this chapter. One refers to the polyethylene/
poly(ethylene glycol) copolymers that were used to functionalize the surfaces of
polyethylene films.5,26 One may refer to this illustration as being a ‘‘smart sur-
face’’ or functionally gradient surfaces. When the film is immersed in an aqueous
dispersion of the copolymer, the ethylene glycol moieties attach to the polymer
film surface resulting in a film surface having solvation behavior similar to
poly(ethylene glycol) itself. Due to the inverse temperature-dependent solubility
behavior of poly(alkene oxide)s in water surface modified polymers are produced
that reversibly change their hydrophilicity and solvation with changes in tem-
peratures.27 Similar behaviors have been observed as a function of changes in
pH.28–31
Another interesting example of materials that respond smartly to changes in
temperature are the fabrics based upon poly(ethylene glycol)-modified cottons,
-modified polyesters, and -modified polyamide/polyurethanes. A combination of
the thermoresponsiveness of these fabrics with a sensitivity to moisture resulted
in a family of fabrics that can serve as smart pressure bandages. When exposed
to an aqueous medium such as blood, these fabrics contract and apply pressure.
Once the fabric dries, it releases the pressure.23
Polymers based upon the monomer vinyl methyl ether have the unique be-
havior of shrinking upon heating to approximately 40⬚C. In the right design with
normal behaving polymers, one can construct a device that can grasp objects
like a hand.
9 pH-SENSITIVE MATERIALS
By far the widely known chemical classes of pH-sensitive materials are the acids,
bases, and indicators. The indicators fit the definition of smart materials by
changing colors, as a function of pH and the action is reversible.
Other examples of pH-sensitive materials include some of the smart gels and
smart polymers mentioned in this chapter. There are a large number of pH-
sensitive polymers and gels that are used in biotechnology and medicine. Usually
these materials are prepared from various combinations of such monomers and
polymers such as methacrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, carboxymethyethyl-
cellulose, cellulose acetate, cellulose phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose
412 SMART MATERIALS
10 LIGHT-SENSITIVE MATERIALS
There are several different material families that exhibit different types of be-
havior to a light stimulus. Electrochromism is a change in color as a function
of an electrical field. Other types of behavior for light-sensitive materials are
thermochromism, color change with heat, photochromism, color change with
light, and photostrictism, shape changes caused by changes in electronic config-
uration due to light.5,19,20
Electrochromic smart windows have been intensively researched over the past
few decades. There have been over 1800 patents issued for optical switching
devices with the bulk of these being issued in Japan. A typical switchable glass
is multilayered with an electrochromic device embedded inside. A window de-
vice may have glass with an interior conductive oxide layer both on the top and
bottom. Inside of the sandwich of glass and conductive oxide is the electro-
chromic device. This device consists of an electrochromic layer, an ion storage
layer, and between these two layers, an ion conductor.
An interesting light-sensitive material with both electro- and thermochromism
behaviors, LixVO2, was evaluated for a smart window application.33
Materials have been developed to exhibit both photochromic and photographic
(irreversible behavior to light) behaviors. One such system is based upon a sub-
stituted indolinospirobenzopyran embedded in a polystyrene matrix. This system
performs as a photochromic system at low exposure in the ultraviolet range and
as a photographic system at high exposures. The image can be devisualized by
heat and can be restored with UV irradiation many times.34
11 SMART POLYMERS
The term smart polymers was almost dropped as a classification for smart ma-
terials in this treatment of the subject. It is very confusing. Each field of science
and engineering has its own definition for a smart polymer and each can fit in
another classification, and its distinction in smartness can be confusing at times.
It is being included as a separate class due to several excellent articles written
with smart polymers in the title.
In medicine and biotechnology, smart polymer systems usually pertain to
aqueous polymer solutions, interfaces, and hydrogels. Smart gels or hydrogels
will be treated separately. Smart polymers refer to polymeric systems that are
capable of responding strongly to slight changes in the external medium: a first-
order transition, accompanied by a sharp decrease in the specific volume of the
polymer. If the external medium is temperature, this transition is known as the
glass transition temperature of the polymer and several properties of the polymer
changes. These properties include volume, coefficient of thermal expansion, spe-
cific heat, heat conductivity, modulus, and permeation. Manipulating the detec-
tion around the glass transition temperature of the polymer can develop smart
devices. There are numerous examples in product development that have resulted
in failure because of not taking into account the glass transition temperature of
the polymer. And it should be noted, as the polymer cools down from high
12 SMART (INTELLIGENT) GELS (HYDROGELS) 413
temperatures and goes below its glass transition temperature, its below glass
transition properties are returned and vice versa.
Smart polymers can respond to stimuli such as temperature, pH, chemical
species, light, UV radiation, recognition, electric fields, magnetic fields, and
other types of stimuli. The resulting response can be changes in phases, shape,
optics, mechanical strengths, electrical and thermal properties, reaction rates, and
permeation rates.
12 SMART (INTELLIGENT) GELS (HYDROGELS)
In the literature you can find these smart materials under a variety of names as
reflected by the title of this section. The concept of smart gels is a combination
of the simple concept of solvent-swollen polymer networks in conjunction with
the material being able to response to other types of stimuli. A partial list of
these stimuli includes temperature, pH, chemicals, concentrations of solvents,
ionic strengths, pressure, stress, light intensity, electric fields, magnetic fields,
and different types of radiation.35–39 The founding father of these smart gels,
Toyochi Tanaka, first observed this phenomenon in swollen clear polyacrylamide
gels. Upon cooling, these gels would cloud up and become opaque. Upon warm-
ing, these gels regained their clarity. Upon further investigation to explain this
behavior, it was found that some gel systems could expand to hundreds of times
their original volume or could collapse to expel up to 90% of their fluid content
with a stimulus of only a 1⬚C change in temperature. Similar behavior was
observed with a change of 0.1 pH units.
These types of behaviors lead to the development of gel-based actuators,
values, sensors, controlled-release systems for drugs and other substances, arti-
ficial muscles for robotic devices, chemical memories, optical shutters, molecular
separation systems, and toys. Other potential systems for the development of
products with smart (intelligent) gels (hydrogels) include paints, adhesives, re-
cyclable absorbents, bioreactors, bioassay systems, and display.
There are numerous examples of the commercialization of these smart gels
in one of the cited reference.35 This chapter will only include a few examples
of smart gels. One such smart gel consists of an entangled network of two
polymers, a poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and a triblock copolymer of poly(propylene
oxide) (PPO) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with a sequence of PEO–PPO–
PEO. The PAA portion is a bioadhesive and is pH responsive, the PPO moieties
are hydrophobic that assist solubilize lipophilic substances in medical appli-
cations, and the PEO functionalities tend to aggregate thus resulting in gelation
at body temperatures. Another smart gel system with a fairly complex compo-
sition consists of citosan, a hydrolyzed derivative of chitin (a polymer of N-
acetylglucosamine that is found in shrimp and crab shells), a copolymer of
poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and poly(acrylic acid), and a graft copolymer of
poly(methacrylic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol). This gel system was developed
for the controlled release of insulin in diabetics. Polyampholytic smart hydrogels
swell to their maximum extent at neutral pH values. When such gels, copolymers
of methacrylic acid 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, are subjected to
either acidic or basic media, they undergo rapid dehydration.39
One very unusual smart gel is based upon the polymerization of N-
isopropylacrylamide, a derivative of tris(2,2⬘-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) that has a
414 SMART MATERIALS
havior at its glass transition temperature and since that free volume change is
reversible, you may call it a smart polymer or a shape memory material or a
thermoresponsive material. The unique characteristic of these polyurethanes is
that their transition occurs in the vicinity of room temperature.44,45
15 UNUSUAL BEHAVIORS OF MATERIALS
As one researches the field of smart materials and structures, one realizes that
there are many smart materials or that there are many material behaviors that
are reversible within their lifetime. The ability to develop useful products from
smart materials is left up to one’s imagination. For example, water is a very
unique material. It expands upon freezing. And as we know, the force generated
by this expansion causes sidewalks and highways to crack. Now, what if you
surround water pipes with a heating system that consists of a heater and water
enclosed in piezoelectric polymer or elastomer container that is in a fixed space.
As the temperature drops to the freezing point of water, it expands and generates
force against the piezoelectric container which in turn generates electricity, thus
powering the heater keeping the pipes from freezing.
As previously mentioned, sometimes it is difficult to classify the material and
its behavior. One such case involves an assigned patent to the University of
Illinois. The title of the patent is ‘‘Magnetic gels which change volume in re-
sponse to voltage changes for magnetic resonance imaging.’’ 46 The patent
teaches the use of a matrix that has a magnetic and preferably superparamagnetic
component and the capability of changing its volume in an electric field.
Fullerenes are spherically caged molecules with carbon atoms at the corner
of a polyhedral structure consisting of pentagons and hexagons. The most stable
of the fullerenes is a C60 structure known as buckyball or buckminsterfullerene.
The fullerenes have been under commercial development for the past decade.
One application of the fullerenes as a smart material consists of embedding the
fullerenes into sol–gel matrices for the purpose of enhancing optical limiting
properties.47
A semiconducting material with a magnetic ordering at 16.1 K was produced
from the reaction of buckyball with tetra(dimethylamino)ethylene. This organic-
based magnet had neither the coercivity nor saturation magnetization to function
totally as a ferromagnet. The replacement of buckyball with higher carbon num-
ber fullerenes in the reaction with tetra(diamethylamino)ethylene did not produce
any complexes that showed magnetic ordering.22
16 COMMENTS, CONCERNS, AND CONCLUSIONS
In dealing with smart materials and structures, there is still a lot of confusion
as to the name of these materials and what makes a material or structure smart.
There are numerous products with Smart in the name that do not meet the
definition of being smart, that is, responding to its environment in a reversible
manner. The scientist/engineer should not fault the advertising professional for
doing his or her job whenever they use the term in a product description. But I
must admit I chuckle to myself whenever I see the magazine Smart Money. Does
this mean that after I spent money it will return to me because it is reversible?
The confusion also exists in the smart materials community with the term
smart polymers. The applications of most smart polymers center around the
polymer’s glass transition temperature. As more design engineers became more
416 SMART MATERIALS
familiar with that term and its significance to a design, the term smart polymer
is some applications will be eliminated and replace with terms like working
smartly with a polymer.
We have not addressed the versatility of these smart materials. One such
example may involve the smart shock absorbers. Two literature sources discuss
the current research that is being focused on vibration suppression in automo-
biles using smart shock absorbers.48,49 These smart shock absorbers were devel-
oped by Toyota and consisted of multilayer piezoelectric ceramics. These
multilayer stacks are positioned near each wheel. After analyzing the vibration
signals, a voltage is fed back to the actuator stack that responds by pushing on
the hydraulic system to enlarge the motion. Signal processors analyzed the ac-
celeration signals from road bumps and responded with a motion that canceled
the vibration.3,17 Such active piezoelectric systems are used to minimize excess
vibrations in helicopter blades and in the twin tails of F-18 fighter jets. One
Internet source discussed the work at the University of Rochester with smart
shock absorbers using electrorheological fluids. The electrorheological fluids
would sense the force of a bump and immediately send an electric signal to
precisely alter the amount to dampen the force of the bump thus providing a
smoother ride. In an engine mount, electrorheological fluids damp out the vi-
brations of the engine thus reducing wear and tear on the vehicle. Another
application of electrorheological fluids is in the clutches to reduce the wear
between the plates as a driver shifts gears. This can reduce the maintenance
costs of high-duty trucks.47 Or one can dampen the vibrations of the road, engine
mounts, and other sources on an automobile or heavy-duty truck with magne-
torheological fluids. The Lord Corporation has developed a series of trademarked
fluids and systems known as Rheonetic that are commercially available for vi-
bration control as well as for noise suppression.49
17 FUTURE
The future of smart materials and structures is wide open. The use of smart
materials in a product and the type of smart structures that one can design is
only limited to one’s talents, capabilities, and ability to ‘‘think out of the box.’’
In an early work5 and as part of the short courses taught there were discus-
sions pertaining to future considerations. A lot of the brainstorming that resulted
from these efforts is now being explored. And there are some that were in the
conceptual stage are moving forward. Look at the advances made with the au-
tomobile and what information and comforts it provides through smart materials
and structures.
We can take automobiles to a garage for service and it is hooked up to a
diagnostic computer and the mechanic is told what is wrong with the car. Or
we have a light on the dashboard that signals ‘‘maintenance required.’’ Would
it not be better for the light to inform us as to the exact nature of the problem
and the severity of it? This approach mimics a cartoon that appeared several
years ago of an air mechanic near a plane in a hanger. The plane says ‘‘Ouch’’
and the mechanic says ‘‘Where do you hurt?’’
One application of smart materials and their application is the earlier work
mentioned of using a piezoelectric ink jet printer to serve as a chemical delivery
to print organic light-emitting polymers in a fine detail on various medium. Why
not take the same application to synthesize smaller molecules? With the right
REFERENCES 417
set one could synthesize smaller molecules in significant amounts for character-
ization and evaluation and in such a way that we could perform design of ex-
periments with relative easy.
A topic of research that was in the literature a few years ago was ‘‘smart
clothes’’ or ‘‘wearable computers’’ being studied at MIT. The potential of this
concept is enormous. This sounds wonderful as long as we learn how to work
smarter not longer.
REFERENCES
1. I. Amato, Science News, 137(10), 152–155 (March 10, 1990).
2. O. Port, Business Week, 3224, 48–55 (March 10, 1990).
3. Committee on New Sensor Technologies: Materials and Applications, National Materials Advi-
sory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council
Report: Expanding the Vision of Sensor Materials, National Academy Press, Washington, DC,
1995, pp. 33–45.
4. C. A. Rogers, Sci. Am., 273(3), 122–126, (Sept 1995).
5. J. A. Harvey, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Ed., Supplement, John
Wiley, 1998, pp. 502–504.
6. I. Chopra, Proceedings of the Smart Structures and Materials 1996—Smart Structures and In-
tegrated Systems Conference for the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, San
Diego, Feb. 26–29, 1996, Vol. 2717, pp. 20–26.
7. T. Thomas, Portland, OR, private communication, 1999.
8. Sensor Technology Limited, Technical Bulletins and Notes, Collingwood, Canada, 1991.
9. T. T. Wang, J. M. Herbert, and A. M. Glass (eds.), Applications of Ferroelectric Polymers, Blackie
and Sons, Glasgow, 1988.
10. J. O. Simpson, http: / / sti.larc.nasa.gov / randt / 1995 / SectionB1.fm513.html.
11. Piezo Systems Inc., Technical Bulletin, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
12. T. W. DeYoung and V. B. Maltsev, U.S. Patent 4,439,780, 1984.
13. S. D. Howkins, U.S. Patent 4,459,601, 1984.
14. T. R. Hebner, C. C. Wu, D. Marcy, M. H. Lu, and J. C. Sturm, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(5), 519–521
(1998).
15. G. L. Anderson, J. Mommaerts, S. L. Tang, J. C. Duke, Jr., and D. A. Dillard, J. Intelligent Mat.
Syst. Struct. 4, 425–428 (1993).
16. G. L. Anderson, D. A. Dillard, and J. P. Wightman, J. Adhes. 36, 213 (1992).
17. R. E. Newnham and A. Amin, CHEMTECH 29(12), 38–46 (Dec. 1999).
18. Proceedings for a Symposium entitled Electroactive Polymers (EAP) held November 29–
December 1, 1999 in Boston, Materials Research Society, Vol. 600, Warrendale, PA, 2000.
19. R. E. Newnham, Mat. Res. Soc. Bull. 22(5), 20–34 (May 1997).
20. B. Culshaw, Smart Structures and Materials, Artech House, Boston, 1996, pp. 43–45, 117–130.
21. K. Derbyshire and E. Korczynski, Solid State Tech. Sept., 57–66 (1995).
22. J. S. Miller and A. J. Epstein, Chem. Eng. News, Oct. 2, 30–41 (1995).
23. R. Dagani, Chem. Eng. News, Sept. 18, 30–33 (1995).
24. R. H. Gerzeski, J. Adv. Mat. 33(2), 63–69 (April 2001).
25. B. Z. Tang, CHEMTECH 29(11), Nov., 7–12 (1999).
26. D. E. Bergreiter, B. C. Ponder, G. Aguilar, and B. Srinivas, Chem. Mat. 9(2), 472–477 (1997).
27. R. Baum, Chem. Eng. News, Jan. 30, 7 (1996).
28. Y. G. Takei, T. Aoki, K. Sanui, N. Ogata, Y. Sakurai, and T. Okano, Macromolecules 27, 6163–
6166 (1994).
29. J. Jhang, R. Pelton, and Y. L. Deng, Langmuir 11, 2301–2302 (1995).
30. J. L. Thomas, H. You, and D. A. Tirrell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 2949–2950 (1995).
31. D. H. Carey and G. S. Ferguson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 9780–9781 (1996).
32. I. Y. Galaev, Russian Chem. Rev. 65(5), 471–489 (1995).
33. M. S. Khan, Proceedings of the Metal / Nonmetal Microsystems: Physics, Technology, and Ap-
plications Workshop held at Polanica Zdroj, Poland, Sept. 11–14, 1996, Society of Photo-Optical
Instrumentation Engineers, Volume 2780, 1996, pp. 56–59.
418 SMART MATERIALS
34. A. Vannikov and A. Kararasev, Proceedings of Smart Structures and Materials 1996—Smart
Electronics and MEMS Conference held at San Diego, Feb. 28–29, 1996, Vol. 2722, Society of
Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 1996, pp. 252–255.
35. R. Dagani, Chem. Eng. News, June 9, 26–37 (1997).
36. R. S. Harland and R. K. Prud’homme, Polyelectrolyte Gels, Properties and Applications, Amer-
ican Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1992.
37. D. DeRossi, K. Kajiwara, Y. Osada, and A. Yamauchi, Polymer Gels Fundamental and Biomed-
ical Applications, Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
38. T. Okano (ed.), Biorelated Polymers and Gels—Controlled Release and Applications in Biomed-
ical Engineering, Academic, Boston, 1998.
39. A. Dupommie, L. Merle-Aubry, Y. Merle, and E. Slgny, Makromolekular Chemie, 187, 211
(1986).
40. R. Yoshida, T. Takahashi, T. Yamaguchi, and H. Ichijo, Adv. Mat. 9, 175 (1997).
41. G. Kauffman and I. Mayo, Chem. Matters, October, 4–7 (1993).
42. D. Stoeckel and W. Yu, Superelastic Nickel-Titanium Wire, Technical Bulletin, Raychem Cor-
poration, Menlo Park, CA.
43. K. Shimizu and T. Tadaki, Shape Memory Alloys, H. Funakubo (ed.), Gordon and Breach, New
York, 1987.
44. S. Hayashi, Proceedings of the US–Japan Workshop on Smart Materials and Structures, The
Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 29–38, 1997.
45. S. Hayashi, S. Kondo, P. Kapadia, and E. Ushioda, Plastics Eng. Feb., 29–31 (1995).
46. P. C. Lauterbur and S. Frank, U.S. Patent 5,532, 006, July 2, 1996.
47. R. Signorini, M. Zerbetto, M. Meneghetti, R. Bozio, G. Brusatin, E. Menegazzo, M. Guglielmi,
M. Maggini, G. Scorrano, and M. Prato, Proceedings of the Fullerenes and Photoiniccs III
Conference, Vol. 2854, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumental Engineers, 1996, pp. 130–139.
48. T. Jones, http: / / www.rochester.edu / pr / releases / ee / jones.htm.
49. The Lord Corporation, Technical Bulletins, Cary, NC.