Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Replicate an experiment guide

    Caricato da

    [AP-STUDENT] Realiza Joy Pablo
    15 visualizzazioni1 pagina
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating experiments on four levels from beginning to proficient. It evaluates conformity to the original experiment procedure, application of the scientific method, interpretation of results, and punctuality and quality. At the lowest level 1, groups are unable to follow the procedure or conduct the experiment on time. At level 2, groups can follow the procedure with modifications and execute the experiment but analysis has shortcomings. Level 3 groups can follow the procedure, execute the experiment properly, and do analysis, but may have room for improvement. The highest level 4 groups can exactly replicate the experiment procedure, properly apply the scientific method, and provide thorough logical analysis, conclusions and recommendations based on results.

    Descrizione originale:

    Titolo originale

    RUBRIC_ Replicate an Experiment - SF Milestone (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formati disponibili

    PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating experiments on four levels from beginning to proficient. It evaluates conformity to the original experiment procedure, application of the scientific method, interpretation of results, and punctuality and quality. At the lowest level 1, groups are unable to follow the procedure or conduct the experiment on time. At level 2, groups can follow the procedure with modifications and execute the experiment but analysis has shortcomings. Level 3 groups can follow the procedure, execute the experiment properly, and do analysis, but may have room for improvement. The highest level 4 groups can exactly replicate the experiment procedure, properly apply the scientific method, and provide thorough logical analysis, conclusions and recommendations based on results.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    15 visualizzazioni1 pagina

    Replicate an experiment guide

    Caricato da

    [AP-STUDENT] Realiza Joy Pablo
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating experiments on four levels from beginning to proficient. It evaluates conformity to the original experiment procedure, application of the scientific method, interpretation of results, and punctuality and quality. At the lowest level 1, groups are unable to follow the procedure or conduct the experiment on time. At level 2, groups can follow the procedure with modifications and execute the experiment but analysis has shortcomings. Level 3 groups can follow the procedure, execute the experiment properly, and do analysis, but may have room for improvement. The highest level 4 groups can exactly replicate the experiment procedure, properly apply the scientific method, and provide thorough logical analysis, conclusions and recommendations based on results.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 1

    100% Replicate an Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

    Experiment (Beginning) (Developing) (Intermediate) (Proficient)


    20% Conformity to Original My group is not able to follow the My group is not able to follow the My group can closely follow the My group can follow the exact
    Experiment procedure stated in the WIKI. procedure stated in the WIKI. We procedure in the WIKI. We have procedure stated in the WIKI. We
    used materials that are significantly to make some small changes to used the prescribed materials and
    different or lacking. it because of some unexpected added some materials to make the
    -or- circumstances. results more accurate without
    My group is not able to conduct the changing the main idea of the
    experiment on time but is able to experiment.
    follow the exact procedure stated
    in the WIKI.
    30% Application of the I am not able to correctly name the I am not able to correctly name the I am able to correctly name the I am able to correctly name the
    Scientific Method independent and dependent independent and dependent independent and dependent independent and dependent
    variables. I cannot collect complete variables. I cannot collect complete variables. I cannot collect variables. I can collect complete
    and detailed results. and detailed results. complete and detailed results. and detailed results.
    My group cannot execute the My group can execute the My group can execute the My group can execute the
    experiment properly so there is a experiment properly but there is a experiment properly but there experiment properly
    high possibility that the changes in possibility that the changes in the is a possibility that the changes
    the dependent variables are not dependent variables are not fully in the dependent variables are
    fully caused by the changes to the caused by the changes to the not fully caused by the changes
    independent variable. independent variable. to the independent variable.
    30% Interpretation of I am not able to analyze results, I lack some analysis of the results. I I am able to analyze our results I am able to analyze our results
    Results compose a conclusion and used the required table from the logically. I can use the required logically. I can use the required
    recommendation in a satisfactory WIKI but I am not able to draw out table from the WIKI. The table from the WIKI and/or add
    manner. any logical conclusion from it. conclusion is satisfactory but the charts of my own. The conclusion
    I am not able to compose a recommendation may not be. AND recommendation are
    conclusion and recommendation I am not able to provide a satisfactory.
    based purely on the results. sufficient explanation for the I am able to provide clear
    -or- conclusion. explanations why the hypothesis
    I am not able to conduct the was accepted or rejected through
    experiment on time but the background research.
    analysis of results, conclusion, and
    recommendation are satisfactory.
    20% Punctuality and Quality My group can conduct the My group can conduct the My group can conduct the My group can conduct the
    experiment on time. experiment on time. experiment on time. experiment on time.
    I am not able to submit the I am not able to submit the I am able to submit the milestone I am able to submit the
    milestone on time. milestone on time. on time. milestone on time.
    I am not able to write in a neat and I am not able to to write in a neat I am not able to write in a neat and I am able to write in a neat and
    organized manner. and organized manner. organized manner. organized manner.
    0%

    Potrebbero piacerti anche