Evaporators for Modern

Cold Chain Infrastructure

By
Ramesh Paranjpey
Fellow Life member ASHRAE
Cell No.+9120-9822398220
Mail: Ramesh.paranjpey@gmail.com
Web:http://Ramesh-paranjpey.com
P-H DIAGRAM-DIRECT EXPANSION
TEMPERATURE LATENT HEAT Sensible Heat
OF AMMONIA OF AMMONIA
kJ/kg kJ/kg
00C 1071.60(500times) 2.19

-200C 1047.04(500Times) 2.24

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS-COIL DESIGN-AIR CIRCULATION- FAN SELECION
COLD STORAGE AIR COOLERS
 Key Points for selecting right size evaporator
1. Flooded or Direct expansion
2. Pump circulation or Gravity Flooded preferred
3. Fin Pitch-Square or Triangular
4. Coil capacity selection-Based on TD1 or MTD
5. Air cooler total surface area or coil internal volume/length of coil without headers?
6. Air Quantity-Based on capacity or size and shape of room
7. Air Flow Direction-Blow Through or Draw Through
8. Material of Construction
9. Tube diameter/fin thickness/Fin Pitch
10. Coil face velocity at the air outlet
11. External static pressure available
12. No of rows deep more or coil face area more ?-inlet/out connection sizes
13. Defrost system-Hot gas/water/electrical heaters/reverse cycle or on/off
 POINT -1
• FLOOFED OR DIRECT EXPANSION?
P-H DIAGRAM-DIRECT EXPANSION
Direct Expansion Air Coil
P-H DIAGRAM-FLOODED EXPANSION
 Flooded Air Coil

FLOODED COOLER IS MORE EFFICIENT THAN DX COOLER

 POINT -2
• GRAVITY FLOODED OR PUMP CIRCULATION?

• Which is better?
 Gravity Flooded System

Static

height

Circulation rate between 1 to 2

 Pumped System

Circulation rate between 3-6

GRAVITY FLOW V/S PUMPED FLOW

LIQUID CONTACT
BETTER IN PUMP
CIRCULATION
 POINT-3
• TRIANGULAR PITCH OR SQUARE?-WHICH IS BETTER
Advantages-
1. Lower defrost Build up
2. Easy and quicker defrost
3. Lower Air resistance
4. Lower motor power

Disadvantages-
1. Lower air side heat Transfer
coefficient
2. Higher fin Temperature
3. Larger Air cooler compared to
Triangular fin
4. More expensive
1. Square Pattern: 21 Tubes

2. Triangular Pattern-21 Tubes

3. Square Pattern-Fin area to Tube

area ratio more

4. External surface Area more than

Triangular Pitch, although tube
area and volume same.

5. Surface area is not as effective as

tube area

6. Triangular Pitch more compact-

2.25” v/s 3”
 POINT-4
• COOLER SELECTION-

• SHOULD IT BE BASED ON -TD1 OR MTD?

 TD1 OR TM
• TD1 =Air On Temperature–Saturated Coil outlet Temperature
• LMTD=Loge TD1(Coil entering temperature-Evaporating temperature)
TD2(coil leaving temperature-evaporating temperature)
• TM=Average(.“Room.”)Air Temperature.–Coil Evaporator Temperature
• Higher LMTD means lower area for the same capacity
• TM coils would be smaller and cheaper but not adequate.
•ALWAYS SELECT COOLER ON THE BASIS OF TD1
TD1=(7-2)=5
LMTD=3.915
 DTM=(7+5)÷2-(1)=5

LMTD 4.93 which is 25.6% -More which means 25.92% smaller cooler
area selection
 TD1
=Air on Temp.(Room Temp.)-Saturated Evaporating temp. at coil outlet

Application TD1=T air,in-T refrig.

Positive temperature High Humidity 2.2 to 4.4 deg. C
above freezing
Positive Temperature Low Humidity 5 deg. C(Preferred)
Negative temperature - 5.5 deg. C to 6 deg. C
storage

Ref: Stocker-Industrial Refrigeration-Page 207

 CONCLUSION

• Q= U * A * LMTD or A=Q÷(U*LMTD)
• TD1 is method is based on the difference between the air temperature
entering the evaporator coil ( room Temperature)and the corresponding
temperature of the saturated suction pressure of the refrigerant
measured at the outlet of the evaporator.
• -Selection by TD1 gives adequate and bigger air cooler compared to TM
and hence should always be used.
• High humidity requirements will require coils with large surface areas
and must be run at low TD’s.
• Low humidity requirements will require coils with smaller surface
• areas and greater TD’s.
 POINT-5
• Air cooler Area-Which area to be considered?
• surface area which includes fin area or coil internal
volume/length of coil without headers?
 Cross Section of Typical Fin
AO-EXTERNAL AREA

AI-INTERNAL AREA

Tube Volume and Tube external area more Effective & important than fin
area-IF-A0/AI LESS, MORE EEFFECTIVE IS THE COIL
 POINT -7

• AIR FLOW DIRECTION-

• DRAW THROUGH OR BLOW THROUGH
Draw through or blow through evaporator – fan configurations
Draw-through or blow-through air coolers
Blow through Draw through

+1 °C +1.2 °C -1 °C +1 °C -1.2 °C -1 °C

Air in +1 °C
Air out -1 °C
Evaporating temp. -6 °C
Surface 284 m2
K value 24

Air temperature °C
Air temperature °C
+1.2 +1
+1 TD air, motor side 0.2 °K 0
0 -1
-1 -1.2
-2 -3
-3 -4
-4 -5
-5 -6
-6 -7
-7 -8
-8 -9
-9 -10

ΔT1,2 = 7.2 K 5K ΔT 1,2 = 7 K 4.8 K

LOG ΔT =
LOG ΔT = 5.83
6.03
Capacity = m2 x K value x LOG ΔT Capacity = m2 x K value x LOG ΔT
= 284 x 24 x 6.03 = 284 x 24 x 5.83
= 41.1 kW = 39.8 kW

BLOW THROUGH IS BETTER

 Advantages and disadvantages
of Blow through/Draw Through units
1. Blow through has higher efficiency
2. The air distribution pattern is less effective due to coil resistance
3. Blow through design has lower discharge velocity as entire coil is in the
air path.-Throw of 11to 13 m possible
4. For longer discharge and more uniform air distribution draw through
design preferred with 33m throw or more.
5. Draw through design uses normally propeller fans
6. Centrifugal or propeller fans can be used for blow through design,
depending on depth of coil, fin spacing
 SUCTION –LIQUID LINE SIZING
• When we select cooler based on capacity –especially for low
temperature applications, The initial cool down load is very high
when we start cooling form ambient temperature. There is very
vigorous boiling and if line sizes are not designed for this load, the
liquid instead entering the air cooler, directly goes to accumulator
and then to compressor in gravity flooded system.
• Always design line sizes of inlet/outlet of air cooler for this situation
• Always worry why suction gas is not getting released from air cooler
rather than worrying about why liquid is not entering coolers-Bruce
Griffiths
 POINT-6
• AIR QUANTITY-
• BASED OF REFRIGERATION CAPCITY OR ROOM
SIZE/SHAPE?
 PROPER AIR CIRCULATION-
IMPORTANCE OF-
AIR THROW & AIR SPREAD & AIR DROP
LEAVE A DISTANCE EQUAL TO HEIGHT BEHIND THE AIR COOLER
Calculating the range
2 1.2
Empirical equation: Air throw = A x Veo x
Ws

A = Correction factor, pressure/suction

(depending on fan type and cooler design)
Veo = Air speed at the evaporator outlet (m/s)
Ws = specific weight of the air
 How is Air Throw defined

0.3 m/s

Most sources recommend a theoretical air speed of 0.3 m/s at the end of
the room. This is pure theory, however, because any airflow of less than
0.5 m/s is dispersed and becomes impractical to measure.

Slide 42
AIR DISTRIBUTION BASICS
AIR THROW & AIR SPREAD
STANDARD POTATO COLD STORAGE-2000MT
• Chamber Size each -21m Lx16m Wx13.7m H
Volume 4603 m3, floor Area=226 m2
• (Refrigeration load -85.32kW)-NHB DOCUMENT
• In each room normally there would be three air
cooler units, each of 33kW, and air quantity of
each is approx.39000 CMH, for 3 coolers it
would be 1,17,000 CMH
 Adequate Air Quantity Based on room Size
• If we consider the same room for storing frozen product which is frozen
elsewhere and brought to the cold rooms.
• All other parameters remaining constant as above except insulation which
would be 150mm thick, instead 100mm since it is low temperature room and
assuming that the product temperature while loading has increased to -15 deg.
C, which was frozen earlier elsewhere at -20 deg. C-Refrigeration Load 24.8 kW
• There would be 2 air coolers each of 13kW having air volume as having
Approx. 13000CMH each cooler, totaling to 26,000CMH as against positive
temperature storage would have 39000CMHx3=1,17,000 CMH
• Conclusion-Air quantity Inadequate for room size-Always Select based on room
Size-Considering -Throw-Spread-drop.-Velocity-0.5m/s at 85 to 90% distance
Air Spaces between packages

Air Spaces
INCORRECT USE OF SPACE
No Proper Air Circulation on Product
 Air Circulation In The Coldroom

c. 90 cm

‘Heat Pockets’ Inside The Stacks Are To Be

Avoided. It Is Therefore Essential That Gaps
Should Be Left Between The Large Cases
When Stacking.

40 cm 40 cm
3-5 cm
GOOD AIR DISTRIBUTION
Figure 8 Batch-continuous air blast freezer with counterflow air circulation

GOOD AIR DISTIBUTION

Figure 16 Air blast freezer arrangement showing the cooler acting
as an air diffuser
Recommended Cooler Placement
DEFROSTING COILS
 Latent Heat v/s Sensible Heat
• To Cool one kg of dry air requires 1.006 kJ/kgda.K energy(0.24 Btu/lb)

• To condense one kg of Vapor

requires 2500.77 kJ/kgda.k energy(1076Btu/lb)
Latent heat requires 4500 times more energy per lb.
COST OF ICE-Rs.1.20 to Rs.1.60 per KG
 Effect of Frost
A light frost accumulation slightly improves the heat transfer of coil
ASHRAE Refrigeration volume 2014 page 14.4

Pa

Difference
Pressure
m3/h
Volume Flow
Frost layer causes less space between
Frost layer blocks heat transfer from the fins so that the pressure drop in air side
air to the fins. Cooling capacity of the is rising. Less air flows through the heat
air cooler is getting less. exchanger coils.
 Evaporator Coil Icing –Or-Excessive
Condensate removal-Reasons
• Coils running at too low a temperature
• Defrost system defective
• Storage RH is too high
• Inadequate air flow
• Coil design incorrect -high fin density, small tubing,
more than required depth leading to removal of
excess moisture than necessary
• Defective insulation-Air leakage through doors-holes
 Defrost for 1Lb
1 Latent Heat Condensation 1076 Btu/lb
2 Sensible Heat to reduce Vapour Temp. From 500F to 320F 10 Btu/lb
3 Sensible Heat (320F to -150F) 23 Btu/lb
6 Latent heat of Frost 144 Btu/lb
7 Total BTU cost to produce frost 1253 Btu/lb
8 Raise temp. From -150F to 320F 24 Btu/lb
9 Latent Heat of Frost 144 Btu/lb
10 Sub total 576 Btu/lb
11 Raise water temperature from 320F to 420F 10 Btu/lb
12 Sub Total 754 Btu/lb
13 Sublimation (generally 16%)0.16x754= 121 Btu/lb
14 Evaporation (generally14%)0.14x754= 106 Btu/lb
15 Total defrost heat required(12+13 +14) 981Btu/lb
16 To produce frost 0.21KWH
17 To defrost frost 0.09KWH
18 Remove defrost heat 0.16KWH
19 Total KWH 0.46KWH
Defrost Loads-Latent Loads-Btu/0.7lb from coil

kWh
1 To produce Frost 0.21 kWh
2 To Defrost Frost 0.09 kWh
3 To remove Defrost Heat 0.16 kWh
4 Total power 0.46 kWh
6 Power required to remove 1 lb of Frost 0.46/0.7=0.66
kWh
Separate hot gas defrost line for defrost pans

Having a separate valve station for

the defrost pan:
 Reduces the energy consumption
since a smaller solenoid valve is
necessary to heat the pan during
the length of the defrost
sequence
 Main hot gas solenoid valve will
only be active for 10 minutes
reducing the amount of heat
added to the refrigerated space.

Danfoss Automatic Controls September 2013 | 5

Air cooler with a
flap which closes
during defrosting
 Suggested Fin Spacing –Run Time-Defrost Frequency

SHR= Fin Spacing Design Defrost

S.H./(S.H.+L.H) Running Time Frequency-
Nos. per day
0.65 2 14 9
0.75 3 16 8
0.85 4 16 6
0.95 4 18 2

As sensible Heat increases less defrost Frequency and closer fin spacing
 Key Points for selecting right size evaporator
• Material of Construction
1. Stainless steel tubes, casing as well as drain pan & and Al fins
2. Entire construction in Aluminium
3. C.S. Tubes with hot deep galvanizing and aluminium fins
4. Any other material to suit surrounding conditions and refrigerant
 Choice of Material
1. Hot Dip Galvanized Steel (Steel/Zn)- (SA179)
2. 304 S.S. Tubes with Aluminium Fins (SST/Al)- (SA249)
3. 3003 Gr. Aluminum Tubes with Aluminum Fins (Al/Al)- (SA210)
 Material Properties
Metal Density Thermal Specific heat Tensile Allowable
Lbs/cft. conductivity Btu/lb. 0F strength Temperature
Btu/sq.ft0F/ft. kJ 0F

C.S.(SA179) 490 26 0.107 47 -20 to +500

304L S.S. (SA249) 501 9.4 0.120 70 -320 to +320

3003 Al(SA210) 16.5 117 0.215 14 -452 TO +300

Advantages Aluminium Coolers

1. Light weight-30% lighter
2. Heat transfer-Better-30% more compact
3. Cost-30% Cheaper
Disadvantages:
1. Cannot be repaired at site Ref: Colmac Coill-USA
2. Delicate-not yet popular
Aluminum Coolers
Psychrometric Analysis
1. Smaller TD less weight loss /
Less Moisture Removed
TD1<TD2
2. For same heat removal Q,
H2 smaller TD - More area, bigger
H1
Coil
TD1
3. For same Heat Removal Q,
TRM smaller H – More cfm –
ADP1 Bigger fan
ADP2 4. Smaller TD, More expensive
Initial cost - lower power
TD2 consumption / running cost

gr/lb of dry air

Q = U X A X T
Q = 4.5 X cfm X H
TD = TRM – TADP (Tevap)
SMALLER TD-LESS PRODUCT WEIGHT LOSS

1. Smaller TD less weight loss /

Less Moisture Removed
TD1<TD2
2. For same heat removal Q,
H2 smaller TD - More area,
H1 bigger Coil
TD1
3. For same Heat Removal Q,
TRM
smaller H – More cfm –
ADP1 Bigger fan
ADP2
4. Smaller TD, More expensive
Initial cost - lower power
TD2 consumption / running cost
gr/lb of dry air

Q = U X A X T
Q = 4.5 X cfm X H
TD = TRM – TADP (Tevap)
 9
8

CAPACITY TON @ 10 0F T.D.

7 COIL CAPACITY

6
5
4
3
2
1

1200
1000
300

400
500

600

700
800
100

200

900

1100
0

AIR VELOCITY - FPM

COIL CAPACITY INCREASES AS AIR FACE VELOCITY INCREASES

 FAN LAWS
1. CFM-2/CFM-1=RPM2/RPM1

2. STATIC PRESSURE-2/STATIC PRESSURE1=(RPM2/RPM1)

2

3. HP-2/HP-1= (RPM2/RPM1)
3
 9
8
7
6 BHP

FAN HP
5
4
3
2 COIL CAPACITY
1
8
7
CAPACITY
6
5 NET CAPACITY
4
3
2
1

1000

1200
1100
900
100
200

300
400
500

600

700
800
0

AIR VELOCITY - FPM

NET CAPACITY DECREASES WHEN FACE VELOCITY INCREASES AS LOSS OF FAN POWER IS
MORE THAN CAPACITY GAIN
 •MORE COMPACT TUBE ARRANGEMENT
•LARGER TUBE DIAMETER
•LOWER SECONDARY TO PRIMARY AREA
•HIGHER PRESSURE DROP
•MORE FAN POWER

MORE COMPACT TUBE ARRANGEMENT OR LARGER TUBE

DIAMETER-MORE EFFECTIVE IS COIL
 COOLING AND DEHUMIDIFICATION

H1
H0
W1
W0

TS T0 T1

•DROP IN TEMPERATURE
•DROP IN MOISTURE
•DROP IN ENTHALPY

WHEN AIR MOVES-TEMPERATURE DROPS-MOISTURE IS SEPERATED-

HEAT IS REMOVED
 INCREASED FACE AREA

ENTERING AIR
LEAVING AIR
M0
M1

MORE FACE AREA

M2

T2 T1 T0

•LOWER LEAVING TEMPERATURE

•LOWER MOISTURE CONTENT
•INCREASED REFRIGERATION CAPACITY

COIL WITH SMALLER FACE AREA AND MORE ROWS DEEP WOULD REDUCE MOISTURE
CONTENT AND TEMPERATURE –M2 THAN MORE FACE AREA AND LESS ROS DEEP-M1
MORE ROW DEEP
(LOWER LEAVING TEMPERATURE)

M0
ORIGINAL

M1
MORE ROWS
OF TUBE
M2

• LOWER LEAVING TEMPERATURE

• LOWER MOISTURE CONTENT
• INCREASED REFRIGERANT CAPACITY
 COIL CONDITION CURVE

MOISTURE CONTENT
AFTER 2 ROWS ENTERING AIR

AFTER 6 ROWS

AFTER 4 ROWS
AFTER 8 ROWS

TEMPERATURE
•EACH EXTRA ROW DOES LESS WORK
•CURVE STEEPER AS AIR PASSES
•RATIO OF MOISTURE REMOVAL TO TEMPERATURE DROP GREATER AT
OUTLET

AS ROWS INCREAS MORE MOISTURE IS REMOVED AND MORE

TEMPERATURE DROP IS ACHIEVED
 CLOSER FIN SPACING

CLOSER FIN
SPACING

T2 T1 T0

•MORE HEAT TRANSFER SURFACE

•LOWER LEAVING TEMPERATURE
•LOWER MOISTURE CONTENT
•INCREASED REFRIGERATION CAPACITY
•HIGH AIR PRESSURE DROP
 HIGHER AIR FLOW RATE

HIGHER AIR
FLOW RATE

T2 T1 T0

•LEAVING AIR TEMPERATURE HIGH

• MOISTURE CONTENT HIGH
•% AIR FLOW INCREASE IS MORE THAN %DECREASE IN
ENTHALPY
•HIGHER CAPACITY
HIGHER AIR FLOW RATE –LEAVING TEMPERATURE AND
MOISTURE IS NOT REDUCED-CAPACITY INCREASES
 HIGHER REFIGERANT TEMPERATURE

HIGHER
REFIGERANT
TEMPERATURE

T2 T1 T0
•REFRIGERATION CAPACITY DECREASES
•LEAVING AIR TEMPERATURE IS HIGH
• MOISTURE CONTENT IS HIGH
•RATIO OF MOISTURE REMOVAL TO TEMPERATURE DROP IS LESS

WHEN HIGHER HYMIDITY IS REQUIRED (VEGETABLES AND FRUITS)-REDUCE TD,

INCREASE FACE AREA, REDUCE NO OF ROWS, INCREASE FACE VELOCITY
 QUESTIONS?
Ramesh Paranjpey
Fellow Life member ASHRAE
Cell No.+9120-9822398220
Mail: Ramesh.paranjpey@gmail.com
Web:http://Ramesh-paranjpey.com
CONDENSERS
Air Cooled Ammonia Condenser
In India air cooled condensers for ammonia application are
seldom used due to high ambient temperatures experienced
in summer. Use of wet pads to cool incoming air on the air-
cooled condensers is one of the methods to overcome high
ambient temperatures and thus keep discharge temperatures
and pressures within limit has been tried in few places,
However by and large air-cooled condensers are not used and
recommended for ammonia applications in India as water is
available in most of the industrial areas.
If someone develops an air cooled Ammonia package for
small cold rooms, where predominantly HFC’S are used, it
will have great potential
Water cooled Atmospheric condenser
Advantages:

1. Efficient operation due to low discharge pressures. With 280C wet bulb temperatures,
it is possible to achieve and maintain 37 to 380C condensing temperatures and thus
lower discharge pressures.
2. The efficiency is better since both sensible and latent heat transfer takes place when
water comes in contact with hot tubes carrying ammonia gas.(Heat and Mass Transfer)
3. These condensers are generally site fabricated and thus reduces other incidental costs.
4. Can be attended /repaired while the plant is in operation by isolating particular bank.
5. Additional banks can be added when more capacity is required.
6. Coil surface visible, hence external cleaning can be done in case fouling is observed
7. Requires low head, water circulation pump and no fans are involved, thus saving in
power.
8. Do not require additional fan power, as these do not use fans and depend only on
natural air movement.
Disadvantages:

1. Occupies large floor space area. However, this drawback is generally overcome by
installing the condenser banks on the roof slab of the machine room.

2. Needs to be kept nearer to machine room to ensure shorter high-pressure ammonia gas
pipelines.

3. Spray water losses are high due to wind velocities as water is carried by winds.

4. Due to constantly varying wind velocities and direction, it is always not possible that all
spray water will wet the tube surface and hence capacity of condenser may not remain at
100% all the times.

5. Higher pressure drops on discharge side due to longer discharge pipe lengths.
Shell and Tube Condenser
Advantages:
1.Compact construction, can be used in skid mounted factory
assembled condensing unit
2.The condenser is installed generally in the plant room
3.The discharge pipe line is small
4.Water consumption is less compared to Atmospheric
condenser
Disadvantages:
1. Requires additional cooling tower and water pump sets with its water piping, valves and
controls
2. Cleaning of tubes requires stopping of compressors & dismantling water heads
3. Manufacturing in factory requires special skills and machinery for handling, rolling,
welding, tube expansion, testing etc.
4. Cooling tower fans and water pump sets requires extra power.
5. Cleaning of tubes require long wire brushes or chemical cleaning facility
6. Additional space for tube cleaning equal to at least the length of tubes needs to be
provided in the machine room.
7. With 280C-wet bulb, the water inlet temperature is around 320C, water out let
temperature is 360C and condensing temperature is around 400C, which is higher than
evaporative or atmospheric condensers.
 PHE Semi Welded Condenser

2nd August 2015 104

Advantages:

1. Extremely compact, enabling factory produced condensing units, especially using screw
compressors.
2. High heat transfer coefficients on water as well as ammonia side due to turbulent flow
and higher velocities.
3. Capacity can be increased/decreased easily by adding/removing plates
4. Reduces total ammonia charge in the system
5. Reliable product since plates manufactured on automatic machines
6. Longer life due to S.S. construction of plates
7. Chances of ammonia leaking in to water do not exist. If ammonia leaks, it would be to
atmosphere and not in the water. This is important since many times cooling towers are
common for the entire utilities and other heat exchanger materials may not be
compatible with ammonia.
Disadvantages;
1. Requires chemical cleaning equipment
2. Water quality needs to be monitored and treated water is preferred
3. Ammonia gas has high discharge temperatures and hence proper material for gaskets need
to be selected. These may need frequent replacements and are expensive.
4. Higher pressure drops on water and ammonia side due to narrow passages
5. If condensing temperatures lower than 400C are required, it is possible with PHE, since PHE
can work with very small temperature differences between water temperature and
condensing temperature, however initial costs are of PHE are higher compared to other
designs.
6. The software available does not recognize two phase conditions i.e. first removal of
superheat, then latent heat for condensing and if required sub-cooling. The flow rates for
the same capacity indicated are different in condenser than evaporator. The mass flow in
system should remain constant, the PHE works out different mass flow rates for condenser
and evaporator
2nd August 2015 107
Evaporative Condensers
EVAPORATIVE CONDENSR OPERATION
Evaporative condenser Tube Arrangement
Advantages:

1. Compact design, requires less space unlike atmospheric condenser

2. Water consumption is less
3. High efficiency, with 280C wet bulb temperature, 380C condensing temperature is easily
possible thus saving in compressor power
4. The tubes can be S.S. construction, thus reducing fouling & rusting
5. Fans can be provided with VFD or water quantity can be reduced to reduce power
consumption in case of low ambient temperatures.
Disadvantages:
1. Needs to be kept nearer to plant room to ensure shorter runs
of high pressure discharge gas pipelines.
2. Requires continuous water bleed equal to evaporation loss to
maintain water quality to reduce tubes fouling
3. Needs to be elevated above receiver for free liquid draining
from evaporative condenser outlet to receiver inlet.
 Type Evaporative condenser Shell & Tube condenser

Dry Bulb Temeprature-0C 40 40

Wet bulb Temperature -0C 28 28

.

Water Tank Temperature-0C 32 32

Water spray Temperature-0C 32 36

Condensing Temperature-0C 38 40

Compressor capacity kW(TR) 201.1(57.17) 198.4 (56.39)

Power consumption-kW 45.14 46.88

Power consumption –kW/TR 0.7896 0.831

C.O.P. 4.45 4.23

 ANY QUESTIONS?
Cell No.+9120-9822398220
Mail: Ramesh.paranjpey@gmail.com
Web:http://Ramesh-paranjpey.com