Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FBE 421
Spring 2020
PRACTICE SETS #1-7
Index
Subject Page
i
PRACTICE SET #1 – VALUATION
CONCEPTS AND ANALYSIS
Problem 1
You calculated the following numbers from the financial statements for a firm for 2019:
EBIT/Sales 10%
Effective tax rate 40%
Sales/Invested Capital 2.0
Problem 2
Assume:
Problem 3
Assume:
EBIT $ 1,000
Tax rate 30%
What is NOPAT?
1
Problem 4
Sales $10,000
CGS 6,000
Oper. Exp. 2,000
Operating income $ 2,000
Tax 800
Net income $ 1,200
A. What is EBIT?
B. What is EBITDA?
C. What is NOPAT?
Problem 5
A firm reports the following items on its most recent balance sheet:
Based on this information, what is the book value of the firm’s invested capital?
2
Problem 6
A firm reported the following income statement for 2019 (in millions).
Sales $20,000
Operating expenses 17,000
Restructuring charge 2,000
Operating profit 1,000
Interest expense 300
Interest income 100
Earnings before taxes 800
Income taxes 320
Net income $ 480
Invested capital at end of 2018 was $15,000, and $16,000 end of 2019.
Problem 7
A firm reports an operating income before tax of $100 million on sales of $1 billion.
Interest expense was $30 million and effective tax rate was 40%. Your analysis of
footnotes to financial statements revealed that included in reported operating income
were the following nonrecurring items:
3
Problem 8
Shown below is a matrix showing various spreads between sustainable ROIC and WACC
and growth scenarios:
(1) A letter V if you believe value will be created. If you believe value will be
created in more than one cell, use V-1 for cell indicating most value creation;
V-2 for next most valuation, etc.
(3) A letter D if you believe value will be destroyed. If you believe value will be
destroyed in more than one cell, use D-1 for cell indicating most value
destroyed, D-2 for cell indicating less value destroyed, etc.
Problem 9
Name three things a company can do to increase its value. Discuss in terms of ROIC,
WACC, and growth in invested capital.
Problem 10
On your first day of your job as a financial analyst, your boss asks you for cons of the
following financial targets:
1. Return on investment (either ROE or ROIC)
2. Payback since this measures how fast a strategy returns cash flow.
3. Growth in sales or earnings.
4
Problem 11
The financial statements of a clothing manufacturer are shown below.
Year Ended
2019 2018
Cash $ 45 $ 25
Accounts receivable 115 145
Inventories 85 150
Prepaid expenses 15 18
Net fixed assets 195 182
Total Assets $455 $520
2019 2018
Net Sales $675 $800
Cost of goods sold 485 580
Selling, general and admin. exp. 82 100
Depreciation expense 25 27
Operating income $ 83 $ 93
Net interest expense 10 13
Earnings before tax $ 73 $ 80
Income tax expense 23 25
Net income $ 50 $ 55
5
Problem 11 continued
b. Break down invested capital into its operating working capital and
fixed asset components.
2019 2018
Operating working capital
Net Fixed assets _____ _____
IC
2019 2018
Sales
Operating expenses excluding depreciation _____ _____
EBITDA
Depreciation _____ _____
EBIT
Tax on EBIT _____ _____
NOPAT
Interest expense after tax _____ _____
Net income
g. Assume there are 25 million shares outstanding during 2019 that were
valued at $15 per share at end of 2019. Compute EPS for 2019.
6
Problem 12
Balance Sheet
2019 2018
Assets
Cash 30 50
Inventory 400 450
Net PP&E 1,600 1,700
Total 2,030 2,200
Income Statement
2019
Sales 2,000
Operating costs, excl. depreciation 1,400
Depreciation 50
Operating profit 550
Interest 40
Earnings before tax 510
Tax 204
Net income 306
7
Problem 12 continued
Problem 13
NOPAT $ 2,000
Invested capital – beginning of year 20,000
Invested capital – end of year 23,000
Net Income 1,500
Shareholders’ equity – beginning of year 12,000
Shareholders’ equity – end of year 14,000
Problem 14
Rider Co.’s income statement for 2018 and 2019 is shown below:
2018 2019
Revenues 5,100 5,400
Operating expenses (3,700) (3,800)
Depreciation (500) (510)
Operating income 900 1,090
Interest income 80 75
Interest expense (250) (260)
Taxes (400) (420)
Net income 330 485
8
Problem 14 continued
Rider’s summarized balance sheet at year-end 2018 and 2019 is shown below:
2018 2019
Cash 2,000 2,200
Inventory 4,000 4,200
Other current assets 1,000 1,200
Net Property, plant and equipment 16,000 16,400
Total Assets 23,000 24,000
9
Problem 15
The following income statement and balance sheet is for a manufacturer of sport
and fashion footwear for 2019.
Balance Sheet
Assets
(In millions)
2019 2018
Current assets
Cash and equivalents $ 800 $ 600
Short-term investments 400 ---
Accounts receivable 2,100 2,000
Inventories 1,600 1,500
Deferred income taxes 100 200
Prepaid expenses 400 300
Total current assets $5,400 $4,600
10
Problem 15 continued
(in millions)
2019 2018
Current liabilities
Current portion long term debt $ --- $ 200
Notes payable 200 100
Accounts payable 800 600
Accrued liabilities 1,000 1,100
Income taxes payable 100 100
Total current liabilities $2,100 $2,100
11
PRACTICE SET #1 – VALUATION CONCEPTS AND ANALYSIS
SOLUTIONS
Problem 1
EBIT/sales 10%
NOPAT/Sales 6%
Problem 2
ROIC = 1,000/11,000 = 9.1%
Problem 3
NOPAT = 1,000 x (1 – 30%) = 700
Problem 4
A. EBIT = 2,000
=1,200
Problem 5
IC = 100 + 200 + 700 – 50 – 100 = 850
Problem 6
a. $1,000
e. $3,000 = 15%
$20,000
f. 600/15,500 = 3.9%
12
g. 1800/15,500 = 11.6%
Problem 7
Problem 8
Problem 9
1. Increase ROIC
2. Decrease WACC
3. Grow IC if ROIC > WACC
Problem 10
1. Can discourage investments that promise returns above cost of capital but below
established goal. Also many investments create value that have bad returns in
early years.
2. No relation to whether return exceeds cost of capital (i.e., has a NPV).
3. No relation to whether return exceeds cost of capital (i.e., has a NPV).
13
Problem 11
a.
2007 2006
Debt 105 118
Equity 238 267
Cash (45) (25)
IC 298 360
b.
2007 2006
Operating working capital 103 178
Net fixed assets 195 182
IC 298 360
Operating W/C
Accounts Receivable 115 145
Inventories 85 150
Prepaid expenses 15 18
Accounts payable (90) (110)
Accrued expense (22) (25
Total 103 178
14
Problem 11 continued
c.
2007 2006
Sales 675 800
Operating expenses excluding depreciation _567 _680
EBITDA 108 120
Depreciation __25 __27
EBIT 83 93
Tax on EBIT 31.5% and 31.3% _ 26 __29
NOPAT 57 64
Interest expense after tax __ 7 ___9
Net income 50 55
f. 83/675 = 12.3%
h $15/$2 = $7.50
Problem 12
A. NOPAT = EBIT x (1 – t)
= 550 x (1 – 204/510)
= 330
15
Problem 12 continued
B.
2007 2006
D. 550 = 13.75
40
Problem 13
Problem 14
A. NOPAT = EBIT x 1 – t
= 1,090 x (1 – .464) = 584
Where
t = 420/(1,090 + 75 – 260) = 420/905 = 46.4%
16
Problem 14 continued
Problem 15
B.
Recurring EBIT = 4,000 – 2,000 = 2,000
17
PRACTICE SET #2 - DCF
Problem 1
Invested capital beginning of year 1 was $134.50. FCF will grow at rate of 5% per year
after year 3. WACC is 10%.
Problem 2
Shown below is a forecast of free cash flow for a beverage company. FCF grows after
year 5 of rate of 5% per year. Complete the valuation.
21
Problem 3
How does the length of the explicit forecast period affect your estimate of the company’s
value?
Problem 4
You estimate Popeye ‘s FCF at $100 for 2008. FCF is expected to grow forever at 5%.
Popeye’s debt is estimated at $400 at year end 2008, and has 50 outstanding shares.
WACC is 10%. What is the estimated value of Popeye’s equity per share at end of 2008?
Problem 5
After year 4, FCF is expected to grow at a rate of 3%. Tax rate is 40%, WACC is 10%.
22
Problem 6
Willy’s Co. generated sales of $3,000 for 2008 and projects the following for 2009:
Problem 7
Based on the following assumptions for 2009, calculate the 2009 FCF and FCFE for Tar
Co.:
EBIT $600
Depreciation 400
Tax rate 40%
Increase in operating working capital 50
Net capital expenditures 500
Increase in debt 50% of increase in IC
Interest expense 100
23
Problem 8
Willy’s Co. generated sales of $3,000 for 2008 and projects the following for 2009:
Problem 9
A firm projects its net cash flow available for debt principal payments and its
debt levels for next 5 years as follows:
Year
1 2 3 4 5
EBIT 64 68 90 105 120
Interest expense (36) (36) (37) (32) (28)
Income before tax 28 32 53 73 92
Tax (40%) 11 13 21 29 37
Net income 17 19 32 44 55
Depreciation 180 186 196 210 224
Capital expenditures (169 (189 (105 (129 (119)
) ) ) )
Increase in operating working capital (32 (34 (52 (60)
) ) (45) )
Net cash flow available for debt
principal payments 18) 78 73 100
(4)
24
Problem 9 continued
Note that firm uses all available net cash flows (after interest expense) to pay down
debt each year through year 5. After year 5, interest expense and free cash flow grows
at rate of 3% per year.
Assumptions:
Cost of debt 6%
Unlevered equity (asset) beta 0.8
Long term U.S. government bond rate 4%
Market risk premium 7%
Long-term annual growth rate 3%
You are to value the firm using the APV method of valuation. Calculate interest
expense based on beginning of year balance of debt. Discount interest tax shields at
cost of debt.
Problem 10
Speedy Growth Inc. forecasts revenues of $10,000 in year 1, expecting to grow 20% in year 2,
10% in year 3, and 5% per year thereafter. Other assumptions:
Year 1 $300
Year 2 $240
Year 3 $200
After year 3 grows at 5% per year
Calculate value of equity using APV method. Discount interest tax shields at cost of debt.
25
PRACTICE SET #2 - DCF
SOLUTIONS
Problem 1
a.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
b.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
IC beginning of year 134.50 137.50 141.50
Additions (NOPAT – FCF)(1) 3.50 4.00 5.00
IC end of year 137.50 141.50 146.50
c.
TV = FCFt (1 + g) = 9 x 1.05 = 189
WACC – g (.10 - .05)
(1)
Or addition to operating working capital + capital expenditures – depreciation.
26
Problem 2
PV of TV= 65,197
Problem 3
To the extent ROIC – WACC spread is larger in the explicit forecast period than in the
TV period, the longer the forecast period, the higher the valuation.
Problem 4
Debt (400)
Equity value $1,700
Shares outstanding 50
Per share value $ 34
27
Problem 5
(A)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
(B)
(C)
Value FCF
Year 1 18.18
Year 2 33.88
Year 3 18.03
Year 4 11.61
PV of TV (250.14/(1.10)4 170.85
EnterpriseValue 252.55
Problem 6
FCF
Sales (3,000 x 1.10) 3,300
EBIT (20%) 660
NOPAT (EBIT x .6) 396
Invest. operating working capital (30)
Net capital expenditures (330)
FCF 36
28
Problem 7
FCF FCFE
EBIT 600 600
x1–t .60 .60
= NOPAT 360 360
Increase in operating working capital (50) (50)
Net capital expenditures (500) (500)
FCF (190) (190)
Interest expense after tax (100 x .06) (60)
Increase debt (50% x 550) 275
FCFE 25
Problem 8
29
Problem 9
Ku = Rf + Bu (MRP)
= 4% + 0.8 (7%)
= 9.6%
Year
1 2 3 4 5
EBIT 64 68 90 105 120
Tax 26 27 36 42 48
NOPAT 38 41 54 63 72
Depreciation 180 186 196 210 224
Capital expenditure (169) (189) (105) (129) (119)
Increase in operating w/c (32) (34) (45) (52) (60)
FCF 17 4 100 92 117
PV of FCF @ 9.6% 15 3 76 64 74
30
Problem 9 continued
31
Problem 10
Year
0 1 2 3
Revenues 10,000 12,000 13,200
EBIT 1,000 1,800 2,640
IC end of year 6,000 6,600 6,930(1)
IC beginning of year 5,000 6,000 6,600
Calculation of FCF
EBIT 1,000 1,800 2,640
Tax on EBIT 400 720 1,056
NOPAT 600 1,080 1,584
Increase in IC 1,000 600 330
Free Cash Flow (Unlevered) (400) 480 1,254
PV @ 11% (360) 390 917
(1)
Sales year 4 of 13,200 x 1.05 = 13,860 x .50 = 6,930
PV @ 11% = 16,046
32
Panel D. Calculation of TV for Interest Tax Shields
33
PRACTICE SET #3 – COMPARABLE
COMPANIES
Problem 1
From the information provided below for Top Service Cable Co., calculate the
EV/EBITDA multiple:
Problem 2
ABC Company is privately held. It is planning an IPO. You have been asked to value
ABC Company using data from DEF Company, a close comparable to ABC. (In
practice, you would use more than one comparable).
36
Problem 3
Newco is planning an IPO. Its EPS is 1.25 and book value per share is $15. The only
comparable that can be identified has a total equity market value of $50 million, total net
income of $2.5 million and book value of $25 million. What per-share IPO price does
the comparable imply?
EPS x =
Book value x =
Ave. of valuations
Problem 4
This problem relates to valuing Smith Corporation, a private company. There are 6 parts
(Parts A – F) to this problem.
Part A
Shown below is data gathered on 5 publicly traded companies that have been selected as
comparables to Smith Corporation. Complete the schedule showing the equity and
enterprise value for each comparable.
B 20 4,000 80,000
C 30 100 0
D 10 1,000 0
E 70 200 2,000
37
Problem 4 continued
Part B
Shown below is the last 12 months and forecasted EPS for each of the 5 comparables,
together with the current stock price. Complete the schedule showing the P/E multiples
(based on LTM and forecasted EPS) and the mean and median multiples.
Part C
Shown below is the last 12 months EBITDA and sales for each of the 5 comparables.
Complete the schedule showing the Enterprise value, EBITDA and sales multiples and
the mean and median multiples.
38
Problem 4 continued
Part D
Shown below is a schedule designed to show the indicated equity value of Smith
Corporation from application of the P/E multiples. Complete the schedule.
In Millions
Multiple
Multiple Selected as Smith Corp. Indicated
Selected Multiple Selected % of Median Fundamental Equity Value
P/E Based on LTM 100% $2,030
P/E Based on forecasted 100% $3,300
EPS (next year)
Part E
Shown below is a schedule designed to show the indicated equity value of Smith
Corporate from application of the EBITDA and sales multiples. Complete the schedule.
Valuation Smith Corp.
Multiple
Selected Multiple Multiple Selected as Smith Corp. Indicated Indicated
Selected % of Median Fundamental EV Debt Equity Value
EV/LTM EBITDA 100% $ 4,935 $10,000
EV/LTM Sales 100% $50,000 $10,000
Part F
Shown below is a schedule designed to obtain an estimated equity value of Smith Corp.
based on application of the above market multiples. Complete the schedule.
Adjusted
Indicated Marketability Discount Equity Value Method Weighted
Selected Multiple Equity Weight Value
Value
P/E based on LTM 40% 25% $
EPS
P/E based on next 40% 25%
year’s EPS
EV/LTM EBITDA 40% 25%
EV/LTM Sales 40% 25%
Total Value $______
/ Shares outstanding 200
= Indicated equity value/share $
39
Problem 5
Shown below is selected data for 4 comparables to the company you are valuing
(amounts in millions).
Problem 6
Shown below are stock prices, Enterprise value, and EPS and EBITDA data for selected
retail stocks. Compute forward looking P/E and LTM EBITDA multiples.
EPS
Enterprise LTM
Firm Stock Price Value ($ millions) LTM Next Year EBITDA ($ million)
A 30.00 75 2.00 2.10 9.0
B 50.00 40 3.00 3.25 5.0
C 35.00 11 1.50 1.60 1.2
40
Problem 7
Sales $12,000
Cost of sales 4,000
Selling, general, admin. Exp. 2,000
Goodwill writedown 3,000
Interest expense 1,000
Taxes 800
Net income 1,200
Shares outstanding 600
Your analysis of comparables is that the one chain P/E multiple based on 2008 earnings
per share is 14. Value Struggler’s stock price.
41
PRACTICE SET #3 – COMPARABLE COMPANIES
SOLUTIONS
Problem 1
Problem 2
42
Problem 2 continued
Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA:
Enterprise Value-to-EBIT:
Enterprise Value-to-sales:
43
Problem 3
EPS 20 x 1.25 = 25
Book value 2 x 15 = 30
Problem 4
Part A
Number
Name of Stock Price of Equity Enterprise
Comparable Per Share Shares Debt Value Value
A 30 4,500 11,000 135,000 146,000
B 20 4,000 80,000 80,000 160,000
C 30 100 0 3,000 3,000
D 10 1,000 0 10,000 10,000
E 70 200 2,000 14,000 16,000
Part B
Forecasted P/E based P/E based
Name of Stock Price LTM EPS on LTM on Proj
Comparable Per Share EPS (Next year) EPS EPS
A 30 1.03 1.36 29.1 22.1
B 20 1.25 1.82 16.0 11.0
C 30 Loss Loss --- ---
D 10 .71 .83 14.1 12.0
E 70 Loss Loss
Mean 19.7 15.0
Median 16.0 12.0
Range 14.1-29.1 11.0-22.1
Selected median since Smith Corp. performance ratios vs. comparables not shown.
44
Problem 4 continued
Part C
Part D
In Millions
Multiple
Multiple Selected as Smith Corp. Indicated
Selected Multiple Selected % of Median Fundamental Equity Value
P/E Based on LTM 16.0 100% $2,030 32,480
P/E Based on forecasted 12.0 100% $3,300 39,600
EPS (next year)
Part E
Valuation Smith Corp.
Multiple
Selected Multiple Multiple Selected as Smith Corp. Indicated Indicated
Selected % of Median Fundamental EV Debt Equity Value
EV/LTM EBITDA 7.69 100% $ 4,935 37,950 $10,000 27,950
EV/LTM Sales 0.80 100% $50,000 40,000 $10,000 30,000
45
Problems 4 continued
Part F
Adjusted
Indicated Marketability Discount Equity Value Method Weighted
Selected Multiple Equity Weight Value
Value
P/E based on LTM 32,480 40% 19,488 25% $4,872
EPS
P/E based on next 39,600 40% 23,760 25% $5,940
year’s EPS
EV/LTM EBITDA 27,950 40% 16,770 25% $4,193
EV/LTM Sales 30,000 40% 18,000 25% $4,500
Problem 5
46
Problem 6
EPS
Enterprise LTM
Firm Stock Price Value ($ millions) LTM Next Year EBITDA ($ million)
A 30.00 75 2.00 2.10 9.0
B 50.00 40 3.00 3.25 5.0
C 35.00 11 1.50 1.60 1.2
Problem 7
47
PRACTICE SET #4 – MERGERS AND
ACQUISITIONS
Note: Unless otherwise indicated, assume that the pre-announcement stock price=
intrinsic value of the stock.
Problem 1
B has offered $42 per share cash for each share of T’s stock. Data on B and T are shown
below:
B T
Pre-announcement stock price per share $ 84 $ 30
Shares outstanding (millions) 20 10
Equity value $1,680 $ 300
(D) Now consider that B has offered 0.5 share of B for each share of T. Calculate the
per share value of the merged firm.
(E) Based on your answer in (D) above, what is the actual premium paid to target’s
shareholders?
(F) Based on your answer in (D) above, what is the buyer’s gain (loss)?
49
Problem 2
B T
Pre-announcement stock price $ 50 $ 40
Shares outstanding (millions) 24 8
Market value (millions) $1,200 $ 320
B offers $20 cash plus 0.6 shares of B per share of T. Synergies are estimated at $100
million.
Problem 3
Actual Forecast
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Sales 100
Net PP&E (end year) 40
Oper. Working Capital (end year) 20
Sales growth 8% 7% 6% 6% 5%
EBIT margin 10% 10% 10% 9% 9%
Tax rate 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
Net PP&E (end year)/Sales 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
Oper. Working Capital (end year)/Sales 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
In addition:
After year 5 sales growth is 5% per year; EBIT margin is 9%, tax rate is 40%, and
asset/sales ratios remain the same
WACC = 8%
Debt and nonoperating assets = $0
End Year IC
Sales
End Year Net PP&E
End Year Oper. Working Capital ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
End Year IC
Incr. in IC
FCF Calculation
Sales
EBIT
Tax ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
NOPAT
Increase in IC ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
FCF
PV of FCF
51
Problem 3 continued
TV Calculation
FCF
2014
Sales
NOPAT
Incr. IC _____ TV = FCFyr. 2014
(WACC – g)
FCF _____
IC = $
End 2014
End 2013 _____
Increase _____
ROIC Calculation*
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
NOPAT
IC (beg. year)
ROIC
*Use beginning of year IC for simplicity
52
Problem 4
You are evaluating Tasty Turnips, an acquisition candidate. You have selected recent
acquisitions of comparable companies as set forth below:
Sales 273
Cost of sales 123
Gross Profit 150
Operating exp. before depr . 120
EBITDA 30
Depreciation 5
Interest expense 6
Taxes 7
Net Income 12
Using acquisition multiples, what is the value of Tasty Turnips? Apply median
multiples for comparables.
53
PRACTICE SET #4 – MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
SOLUTIONS
Problem 1
Alternate computation:
Pre-acquisition value of buyer 300 million
Synergies 100
Cost of stock(83.20x5shares) (416)
Loss to B (16) million
54
Problem 2
Proof
Post acquisition equity value = 1200 + 320 + 80 – 160 = 1,440
Post acquisition shares = 28.8
Post acquisition share price = 1440/28.8 = 50 (which equals pre
acquisition share price of B).
55
Problem 3
End Year IC
FCF Calculation
56
Problem 3 continued
TV Calculation
FCF
2014
Sales 136.3 x 1.05 143.1
NOPAT (9% x 60% x 143.1) 7.7
TV = FCFyr. 2014
Incr. IC 4.1
(WACC – g)
FCF 3.6 = 3.6/(.08 - .05)
= $ 120
IC
End 2014 (60% x 85.9
143.1)
End 2013 81.8
Increase 4.1
ROIC Calculation
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
57
Problem 4
Based on Based on
Sales Multiple EBITDA Multiple
8.75 x 30 262.50
58
PRACTICE SET #5 - RESTRUCTURING
Diversified, Inc. has three divisions that are unrelated to each other. Show below
is the net income of each division, and the P/E multiple that you think it should be valued
at based on your comparable company analysis.
The stock of the parent sells for $26. Shares outstanding total 1,000. This
represents a consolidated P/E multiple of 8.4x. (Consolidated net income from 3
divisions is $3,400 and after overhead of $300, Consolidated net income is $3,100 or
$3.10 per share. $26.00 stock price/$3.10 = 8.4x.) You conclude that subsidiary C is not
getting its proper value in the market place. You have come up with 3 alternatives:
Alternative 1: Do an IPO of subsidiary C. You would sell 20% of the stock to the public
on a tax free basis. Your investment banker agrees with your valuation of 20 P/E
multiple but advises you that your net proceeds will be 80% of the subsidiary’s trading
value due to IPO discount and fees.
Alternative 3: Sell subsidiary C to a third party strategic buyer. Your banker believes it
can get a third party to acquire the unit at a P/E multiple of 25x. Your tax staff tells you
the tax basis for purposes of sale is $2,000. Tax rate is 40%.
Question 2: What is the potential increase in value for each alternative and impact on
firm’s cash position?
59
Solution Question 1
Solution Question 2
Alternative 1: IPO
Post IPO
60
Alternative 2
Post Spinoff
Diversified Inc.
No cash gain
*Value $320 higher than IPO since IPO cost is 20% of $1,600 proceeds.
61
Alternative 3 – Sale to Third Party
After Sale
62
PRACTICE SET #6 - LBOs
Problem 1
A. An LBO candidate currently has EBITDA of $150 and net debt of $50. The
financial buyer can borrow up to 6x total EBITDA (including refinancing current
net debt of $50). What is the maximum amount of debt that financial buyer can
borrow?
B. Assume the financial buyer is willing to contribute 25% of the total purchase
price as equity. What is the dollar amount of equity contribution?
C. A 5 year projection shows that EBITDA of $150 will be increased to $170 in year
5. Total debt will be reduced to $350. Assuming no multiple expansion, what is
enterprise value end of year 5?
D. What is equity value end of year 5?
E. How much did equity value increase over 5 years and why?
F. Assume the financial buyer requires 25% IRR. What is the maximum equity that
can be invested in LBO?
G. Is this LBO deal feasible? What does it depend upon?
63
PRACTICE SET #6
SOLUTIONS
A. EBITDA 150
Multiple x 6
Total debt permitted 900
/EBITDA 150
=Purchase multiple 8
F. 1,010/(1.25)5 = 331
64
Practice Set #7 – Valuation of Private Firms
Problem #1
You are valuing a restaurant that is being offered for sale by its well-known chef-owner.
Last year the restaurant had FCF of $1 million. Expected growth rate is 2%, and WACC
is 12%. Restaurant debt is $100,000.
You acquire the restaurant. You expect FCF to drop 20% per year if the chef leaves.
Question A – what is the value of the restaurant assuming the chef remains?
Question B – what is the value of the restaurant if the chef departs but signs a non-
compete agreement?
Question C – Assume that you are going to acquire the restaurant, the chef departs, but
you secure a non-compete agreement at an after tax cost of $50,000. You negotiated a
discount for lack of liquidity of 25%. What price would you pay?
65
Solutions to Practice Set #7 – Valuation of Private Firms
Problem #1
= $10,200,000
= $8,160,000
66