Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Hon-Ming HO)
Practice Exercises 7: Limits and Continuity in Higher Dimensions
where 𝐿 and 𝑀 are two real numbers. Then we have the following:
1) (Addition Rule) lim ( 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑔(𝑥, 𝑦) ) = 𝐿 + 𝑀 .
(𝑥,𝑦)→(𝑥0 ,𝑦0 )
𝑓(𝑥,𝑦) 𝐿
4) (Quotient Rule) lim ( )= 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑀 ≠ 0 .
(𝑥,𝑦)→(𝑥0 ,𝑦0 ) 𝑔(𝑥,𝑦) 𝑀
𝑟/𝑠
5) (Power Rule) lim ( 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) ) = 𝐿𝑟/𝑠 where 𝑟 and 𝑠 are integers with no common factors and 𝑠 ≠ 0 ,
(𝑥,𝑦)→(𝑥0 ,𝑦0 )
we also assume that 𝐿𝑟/𝑠 is a real number. If 𝑠 is even, we assume that 𝐿 > 0 .
9) (General Logarithmic Rule) lim ln |𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦)| = ln |𝐿| provided that 𝐿 ≠ 0 and function 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) is never
(𝑥,𝑦)→(𝑥0 ,𝑦0 )
Exercise 1:
𝑥 2 +𝑦 3
1) lim cos ( )
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥+𝑦+1
2) lim ln|1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 |
(𝑥,𝑦)→(1 ,1)
3
3) lim √|𝑥𝑦| − 1
(𝑥,𝑦)→(1 ,1)
(cos 𝑦)+1
4) lim
(𝑥,𝑦)→( ,0) 𝑦−sin 𝑥
𝜋
2
Solution to Exercise 1:
Evaluating limits of functions is a kind of pattern recognition, recognizing which limit rules are to be applied at different steps.
Part 1):
𝑥 2 +𝑦 3 𝑥 2 +𝑦 3
Since cos ( ) = cos ῧ , where ῧ = , the general cosine rule is one of possible limit rule to be applied.
𝑥+𝑦+1 𝑥+𝑦+1
Then we have
𝑥 2 + 𝑦3 𝑥 2 + 𝑦3
lim cos ( )= lim cos ( ῧ ) = cos ( lim ῧ ) = cos ( lim )
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥+𝑦+1 (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 + 𝑦 + 1
𝑥 2 +𝑦 3
2) Things to do: Check whether or not lim ῧ = lim exists as a real number. Again we enter into the process
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥+𝑦+1
𝑥 2 +𝑦 3
of pattern recognition. Identify the pattern of .
𝑥+𝑦+1
𝑥 2 +𝑦 3 ▭1
Since = , we may use quotient rule for computing limits. Be careful! To apply the quotient rule, make sure that
𝑥+𝑦+1 ▭2
the limit of the denominator is not equal to zero. Otherwise, quotient rule is not applicable.
𝑥 2 + 𝑦3 lim 𝑥2 + lim 𝑦3 02 + 03 0
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0)
lim ῧ = lim = = = =0 .
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 + 𝑦 + 1 lim 𝑥+ lim 𝑦+1 0+0+1 1
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0)
Conclusion:
𝑥2 + 𝑦3 𝑥 2 + 𝑦3
lim cos ( )= lim cos ( ῧ ) = cos ( lim ῧ ) = cos ( lim ) = cos 0 = 1 .
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥+𝑦+1 (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 + 𝑦 + 1
1) Things to do: Recognize pattern of the function expression inside the limit sign. Can the given function be written as a sum of
two parts, or difference of two parts, or product of two parts, or quotient of two parts … and so on. In this example, the
function inside the limit notation is ln|1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 | . Identify the pattern of ln|1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 | .
Since ln|1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 | = ln| ῧ | , where ῧ = 1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 , the general logarithmic rule is one of possible limit rule to be applied.
Then we have
provided that lim ῧ exists as a real number and ῧ is never equal to zero near the point (1,1) .
(𝑥,𝑦)→(1 ,1)
2) Things to do: Check whether or not lim ῧ = lim (1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 ) exists as a real number. Again we enter into the
(𝑥,𝑦)→(1 ,1) (𝑥,𝑦)→(1 ,1)
Since 1 + 𝑥 2 𝑦 2 = ▭1 + ▭2 , we may use addition rule for computing limits and then follows by product rule.
Conclusion:
Find limits of
√2𝑥−𝑦−2
1) lim
(𝑥,𝑦)→(2 ,0) 2𝑥−𝑦−4
2𝑥−𝑦≠4
√𝑥−√𝑦+1
2) lim
(𝑥,𝑦)→(4 ,3) 𝑥−𝑦−1
𝑥−𝑦≠1
Answers of Exercise 2:
1
Both limits are equal to . Why?
4
Exercise 3:
Determine at what points (𝑥0 , 𝑦0 ) in the plane the given functions below are continuous.
a) 𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = sin(𝑥 + 𝑦)
1
b) 𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = sin( )
𝑥𝑦
𝑥+𝑦
c) 𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) =
2+cos 𝑥
1
d) 𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) =
𝑥 2 −𝑦
Solution to Exercise 3:
Things to do: Find values of 𝑥0 and 𝑦0 such that (1) 𝑓(𝑥0 , 𝑦0 ) is well-defined and (2) equation
lim 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑓(𝑥0 , 𝑦0 )
(𝑥 ,𝑦)→(𝑥0 , 𝑦0 )
holds.
undefined symbol in Thus the following equation holds point of the 𝑥𝑦-plane
1 1 except those points
mathematics. So 𝑓 is lim =
(𝑥 ,𝑦)→(𝑥0 , 𝑦0 ) 𝑥 2 − 𝑦 (𝑥0 )2 − 𝑦0
well-defined lying on parabola
2
provided that 𝑦0 ≠ (𝑥0 ) .
everywhere except 𝒚 = 𝒙𝟐 .
Exercise 4:
𝑥4
a) 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = ,
𝑥 4 +𝑦 4
𝑥𝑦
b) 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = ,
|𝑥𝑦|
𝑥+𝑦
c) 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = .
𝑥−𝑦
Solution to Exercise 4:
Things to do: To show the non-existence of limit of the given function, use two-path test. (Remember: if you want to show
that the limit of a certain function exists, do not use the two-path test.) Construct two different paths on the 𝑥𝑦-plane leading
to the origin (𝑥, 𝑦) → (0 ,0) such that the two limits along the two proposed paths are totally different.
Limit along the 1st path: Limit along the 2nd path: Conclusion by using the two-
path test:
(a) The 1st testing path is to take 𝑥 = 0 and The 2nd testing path is to take 𝑦 = 0 . Since the limits along the
𝑦 → 0+ . That is, we take the path along That is, we take the path along the 𝑥-axis two proposed paths are
the positive 𝑦 -axis approaching the approaching the origin. different from each other,
origin. we can say that
𝑥4 04 𝑥4 𝑥4 𝑥4
lim = lim lim = lim lim
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 4 + 𝑦 4 (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 04 + 𝑦 4 (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 4 + 𝑦 4 (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 4 + 04 (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) 𝑥 4 + 𝑦 4
𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑥=0 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑥=0 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑦=0 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑦=0
𝑦→0+ 𝑦→0+ 𝑥≠0 𝑥≠0 does not exist.
= lim 0= 0. = lim 1= 1.
(𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0) (𝑥,𝑦)→(0 ,0)
𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑥=0 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑦=0
𝑦→0+ 𝑥≠0