Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The effect of Cd-doping on physical properties of Ni0.6-xCdxMg0.4Fe2O4 spinel ferrite has been investi-
Received 29 March 2019 gated. Scanning electron spectroscopy (SEM) confirms the formation of grain and grain boundaries in
Received in revised form these samples and the presence of all chemical elements introduced was confirmed by EDS. The X-ray
26 June 2019
analyses indicate that all the compounds have the cubic structure with Fd3m space group, cell parameter
Accepted 27 June 2019
Available online 28 June 2019
increase which Cd content. A ferromagnetic state at room temperature for all compounds is detected by a
magnetization measurement of hysteresis loops. We note that the saturation magnetization increases
with Cd content, however, the remnant magnetization, and the corrective field decreases. DC electrical
Keywords:
Ferrite
conductivity analysis shows a semiconductor behavior for all sample. In addition, non-overlapping small
Spinel structure polaron tunneling (NSPT) and the overlapping large polaron tunneling (OLPT) are the dominants con-
Magnetic properties ductions mechanisms in our samples.
Electrical conduction mechanisms © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.339
0925-8388/© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
N. Hamdaoui et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 803 (2019) 964e970 965
2. Experimental details
3. Results and discussions content increases from 0 to 0.4. In addition, the EDX spectra
reveal the presence of all chemical elements (Cd, Ni, Mg, Fe, and O)
3.1. FESEM and EDX analysis introduced along with the elaboration of Ni0.6-xCdxMg0.4Fe2O4
samples, confirming that there is no loss of any integrated element
Fig. 1 shows the FESEM micrograph of Ni0.6-xCdxMg0.4Fe2O4 after the heating process.
samples, we can see that all samples are formed by grains and grain
boundary, which reveals a good grain growth during the heat 3.2. XRD analysis
process. The grains have a polygonal form with average grain size,
which decreases from DSEM ¼ 1 mm to DSEM ¼ 0.3 mm when Cd- X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis is performed to study the
966 N. Hamdaoui et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 803 (2019) 964e970
Fig. 3. X-ray diffraction pattern and the corresponding Rietveld refinement. Observed
(Yobs) and calculated (Ycalc) patterns are compared (blue line) for Ni0.6-
xCdxMg0.4Fe2O4 samples. The vertical ticks show the positions of the calculated Bragg
reflections. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the
reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
rapidly which then increases slowly at higher fields but does not
reach a complete saturation. This behavior confirms the existence
of FM and AFM phases in our compounds, where the FM phases get
responses quickly at the lower fields while the AFM phase responds
slowly even at higher fields.
In order to determine the values of saturation magnetization
and coercive field, a theoretical analysis was performed by fitting
the hysteresis loops using the following equation:
Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction spectrum for all samples.
N. Hamdaoui et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 803 (2019) 964e970 967
Table 1
Rietveld-refined parameters.
Fig. 6. Magnetic hysteresis loop at room temperature for x ¼ 0.00; x ¼ 0.20 and x ¼ 0.40
samples. The inset present a zoom for low field region.
Fig. 5. The unit cell where the positions of all elements are properly identified. where s0 is a pre-exponential factor, Ea is the activation energy, kB
is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In
Fig. 8, we present the evolution of Ln (sDC ) as a function of 1000/T
" !# for the three compounds. Then, a linear fit of these curves allow us
MSFM H±Hci p MRFM
MðHÞ ¼ 2 tan1 tan þ cH (1) to determine the activation energy values which is found to be
p Hci 2 MSFM Ea ¼ 0.242 eV, Ea ¼ 0.248 eV, Ea ¼ 0.248 eV for x ¼ 0.00, x ¼ 0.20 and
x ¼ 0.40 samples respectively. These values are close to that found
where the first term is related to the FM contributions and the for another similar ferrite [36]. On the other hand, the frequency-
second one represents the linear contribution from the AFM one dependent conductivity increase with frequency to switch from
968 N. Hamdaoui et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 803 (2019) 964e970
Table 2
Parameters extracted from fitting the hysteresis loops of x ¼ 0.00; x ¼ 0.20 and
x ¼ 0.40 compounds.
Fig. 7. Remnant magnetization Mr and the coercive field H casa function of Cd content.
4kB T
n1 ¼ 1 þ (5)
1
WH kB TLn ut 0
4kB T
n1 ¼ 1 þ (6)
WH
The WH values are calculated using equation (6), presented
Fig. 9. Variation of the log(sDC) as a function of (1000/T) for all sample. Red solid line is versus temperature for all samples and shown in the inset of Fig. 9
the linear fit for our data using SPH model. (For interpretation of the references to
(a). We note that WH decreases with temperature for all samples
colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
confirming that the number of free carriers will be increased. As a
result, this behavior supports that the sAC increases with the
increasing temperature.
Furthermore, the CBH model suggests that the transport process
arises by single or bipolaron hopping mechanism through the
Coulomb barrier occurred between two trap centers. The binding
energy has been calculated from equation (7) as follow:
6kB T
n1 ¼ 1 (7)
WM kB TLnðut0 Þ
Then for high values of WM/kBT, the parameter n1 can be
reduced as:
6kB T
n1 ¼ 1 (8)
WM
Experimental data of high-frequency n2 exponent is fitted using
equation (8) and then the deduced WM parameter for all of the
Ni0.6-xCdxMg0.4Fe2O4 samples are presented in Fig. 9 (b).
To approve the occurrence of tow contribution which is asso-
ciated to grains and grain boundaries in the transport process, we
presented the Cole-Cole plot (Z00 vs. Z’) at room temperatures
(Fig. 11). Cole-Cole plot indicates the presence of two semicircular
arcs. A small semicircle at a higher frequency and a large semicircle
at a lower frequency. The presence of these semicircles indicates
the existence of two different relaxation processes attributed to the
grains and grain boundaries, which confirms the results discussed
above.
4. Conclusion
Fig. 11. Nyquist diagrams (Z00 vs. Z0 ) at room temperatures for x ¼ 0.00; x ¼ 0.20 and x ¼ 0.40 samples.
confirms that the electric transport is governed by the polaron J.D. Ardisson, J. Alloy. Comp. 758 (25 August 2018) 247e255.
[23] N.N. Sarkar, K.G. Rewatkar, N.S. Meshram, V.M. Nanoti, Ferroelectrics 519
hopping mechanism. In addition, the AC conductivity is charac-
(2017) 209e212.
terized using a modified Jonscher's law, and the conductivity pro- [24] Misbahul-Islam TahirAbbas, M.Ashraf Chaudhry, Mater. Lett. 53 (1e2) (March
cess is confirmed by NSPT and CBH mechanisms. 2002) 30e34.
[25] M.M. Eltabey, A.M. Massoud, C. Radu, J. Nanomater. (2014) 7. Article ID
492832.
References [26] D.K. Saha, M.A. Hakim, Dielectric Properties, Resistivity and Curie temperature
of Co doped CdNi perminvar ferrite, J. Bangladesh Acad. Sci. 32 (1) (2008)
[1] M. Guyot, V. Cagan, J. Man. Magn. Mater. 27 (1982) 202e208. 23e32.
[2] Y. Ko€seoglu, F. Go€züak, A. Baykal, H. Kavas, Polyhedron 28 (2009) 2887e2892. [27] A.K.M.A. Hossain, M.R. Amin, H. Tanaka, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 334 (2013) 124.
[3] N. Singh, A. Agarwal, S. Sanghi, S. Khasa, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 (2012) [28] R.A. Young, The Rietveld Method, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
2506e2511. [29] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A. 32 (1976) 751.
[4] Z. Gu, X. Xiang, G. Fan, F. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (47) (2008) 18459e18466. [30] M. Siva Ram Prasad, B.B.V.S.V. Prasad, B. Rajesh, K.H. Rao, K.V. Ramesh,
[5] F. Cheng, C. Liao, J. Kuang, Z. Xu, C. Yan, L. Chen, H. Zhao, Z. Liu, J. Appl. Phys. 85 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323 (2011) 2115e2121.
(5) (1999) 2782e2786. [31] P.B. Belavi, G.N. Chavana, L.R. Naika, R. Somashekar, R.K. Kotnala, Mater. Chem.
[6] M.T. Rahman, M. Vargas, C.V. Ramana, J. Alloy. Comp. 617 (2014) 547e562. Phys. 132 (2012) 138e144.
[7] G. Mustafa, M.U. Islam, W. Zhang, Y. Jamil, A.W. Anwar, M. Hussain, M. Ahmad, [32] L.R. Shah, H. Zhu, W.G. Wang, B. Ali, T. Zhu, X. Fan, Y.Q. Song, Q.Y. Wen,
J. Alloy. Comp. 618 (2015) 428e436. H.W. Zhang, S.I. Shah, J.Q. Xiao, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43 (2010), 035002.
[8] R.S. de Biasi, A.B.S. Figueiredo, A.A.R. Fernandes, C. Larica, Solid State Commun. [33] P. Kumar, N. Shankhwar, A. Srinivasan, M. Kar, J. Appl. Phys. 117 (2015)
144 (2007) 15e17. 194103.
[9] X. Wu, Z. Ding, N. Song, L. Li, W. Wang, Ceram. Int. 42 (2016) 4246e42455. [34] E.J. Verwey, J.H de Boer, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 55 (1936) 53.
[10] M. Idrees, M. Nadeem, M.M. Hassan, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43 (2010) 155401. [35] R.S. Devan, Y.D. Kolekar, B.K. Chougule, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18 (2006)
[11] R. Jemaï, R. Lahouli, S. Hcini, H. Rahmouni, K. Khirouni, J. Alloy. Comp. 705 9809.
(2017) 340. [36] S. Hcini, A. Selmi, H. Rahmouni, A. Omri, M.L. Bouazizi, Ceram. Int. 43 (2)
[12] A. Selmi, S. Hcini, H. Rahmouni, A. Omri, M.L. Bouazizi, A. Dhahri, Phase (2017) 2529e2536.
Transitions 90 (2017) 942. [37] A.K. Jonscher, Nature (London) 264 (1977) 673.
[13] M.A. Rahman, A.K.M.A. Hossain, Phys. Scripta 89 (2014), 025803. [38] Dhahbi Tlili, Nejeh Hamdaoui, Sobhi Hcini, Mohamed Lamjed Bouazizi,
[14] M. Hashim, Alimuddin, S. Kumar, S.E. Shirsath, R.K. Kotnala, H. Chung, Sadok Zemni, Phase Transitions 90 (6) (2016) 644e652.
R. Kumar, Powder Technol. 229 (2012) 37e44. [39] Hsini Mohamed, Nejeh Hamdaoui, Sobhi Hcini, Mohamed Lamjed Bouazizi,
[15] N. Hamdaoui, Y. Azizian-Kalandaragh, M. Khlifi, L. Beji, Ceram. Int. 45 (13) Sadok Zemni, Lotfi Beji, Phase Transitions 91 (3) (2017) 1e16.
(2019) 16458e16465. [40] F. Mizouri, N. Abdelmoula, D. Mezzane, H. Khemakhem, J. Alloy. Comp. 763
[16] M. Naeem, N.A. Shahb, I.H. Gul, A. Maqsood, J. Alloy. Comp. 487 (2009) (2018) 570.
739e743. [41] M. Baazaoui, Nejeh Hamdaoui, M.R. Laouyenne, W. Cheikhrouhou-Koubaa,
[17] H. Moradmard, S. Farjami Shayesteh, P. Tohidi, Z. Abbas, M. Khaleghi, J. Alloy. Lotfi Beji, M. Oumezzine, J. Supercond. Nov. Magnetism 30 (10) (2017)
Comp. 650 (2015) 116e122. 2763e2770.
[18] L. John Berchmans, R. Kalai Selvan, P.N. Selva Kumar, C.O. Augustin, J. Magn. [42] S.R. Elliot, Adv. Phys. 36 (1987) 135e217.
Magn. Mater. 279 (2004) 103e110. [43] T.M. Meaz, S.M. Attia, A.M. Abo El Ata, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 257 (2003)
[19] M.A. Gabal, Y.M. Al Angari, H.M. Zaki, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 363 (2014) 6e12. 296e305.
[20] M.A. El Hiti, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 29 (1996) 501e505. [44] K.H. Mahmoud, F.M. Abdel-Rahim, K. Atef, Y.B. Saddeek, Curr. Appl. Phys. 11
[21] P. Thakur, R. Sharma, V. Sharma, P.B. Barman, M. Kumar, D. Barman, (2011) 55e60.
S.C. Katyal, P. Sharma, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 432 (2017) 208e217.
[22] P.M.A. Caetano, A.S. Albuquerque, L.E. Fernandez Outon, W.A.A. Macedo,