Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1.0 INTRODUCTION
There are several methods that are used for defrosting coils in areas that operate below 35°F.:
i. Hot Refrigerant Gas Water
ii. Water
iii. Air
iv. Combinations of (1), (2), and (3)
. The predominant method is Hot Gas.
Since the rate of heat transfer is a function of the temperature difference between the coil
surface and the room air, the lower refrigerant temperature/pressure during defrost , the lower
will be the magnitude of the heat losses to the space.
At lower. defrost pressures, the defrosting takes slightly longer than at higher pressures.
Obviously the shorter the period of time that the unit is allowed to add heat to the space, the more
efficient the defrost. However, with slightly extended defrost times at lower temperature, the
overall defrosting efficiency is much better than at higher temperature/pressure due to the
reduction of refrigeration requirements.
The maximum efficiency in defrost occurs when the losses are minimized. One of the losses
during defrost can be hot gas, or uncondensed gas, that blows through the coil and the relief
regulator, and vents back to the compressor. Some of this gas load cannot be contained, therefore,
it must be vented to the compressor thru the wet return line. It is most energy efficient to vent this
hot gas to the highest suction possible. Thus, an evaporator defrost relief should be vented to the
intermediate or high stage compressor, if the system is two stage. See Figures 1 and 2 for a
conventional hot gas defrost system for evaporator coils of 15 TR and below.
Note that with this system , it is assumed that the wet return is above the evaporator & that a
single riser is employed. Wet returns below the coil & double risers will be discussed later in
this paper.
Since defrosting efficiency is so low, it is obvious that both the frequency and the duration
,
of defrost should be kept to an absolute minimum. The defrosting ought not be initiated any more
than necessary to keep the coils clean. Certainly less defrosting would be required during the
winter than during the hotter, more humid periods; so an effective energy saving measure would
be to reset defrost schedules in the winter.
Demand defrost, actuated by a pressure device that measures the air pressure drop across
the coil is a good way to minimize total daily defrost time. . Other methods of sensing frost
formation on coils are available, however, we will discuss a pressure sensing device. Using this
method, the coil is defrosted automatically only when necessary. This initiation system, plus the
addition of a float drainer to dump the liquid formed during defrost to an intermediate vessel,
comprises the most efficient defrost system available. See Figures 3 and 4 for details.
Estimates indicate that the probable load placed on a refrigeration system by a coil during
defrost is up to three (3) times the design load during the operating cycle. Thus it behooves. us
to properly engineer hot gas defrost systems.
There are several approaches to designing hot gas defrost systems. Figures 3 and 4 show a typical
demand defrost system for both upfeed and down feed coils. This design returns the defrost liquid
to the system's intermediate pressure. An alternate way to do this is to direct the defrost liquid into
the wet suction. It is much better to employ a float drainer or thermostatic trap in lieu of the relief
regulator and install a hot gas regulator at the hot gas inlet to the coil. See Figures 3 and 4.
Most defrost systems now installed (Figure 1 and 2) use a time clock to initiate defrost; a "demand
defrost" system is shown in Figures 3 and 4. The system uses a photo helix pressure switch for
measuring the air pressure drop across the coil and in turn actuating the defrost. It uses a
thermostat to terminate the defrost cycle. A timer is also used as a back up to make sure the
defrost terminates.
1 inch 1- 8
1/4 inch 20
1-1/2 inch 30
2 inch 2- 58
1/2 inch 92
3 inch 162
4 inch 328
5 inch 594
6 inch 970
This chart is based on 100 psig hot gas pressure and 1.5 psi per 100 equivalent feet of pipe.
The outlet pressure regulating valve should be sized in accordance with the manufacturers
engineering data.
There are advantages to reducing the defrost hot gas pressure in the equipment room, the main
one being less liquid will condense in the hot gas line as the condensing temperature is reduced to
52°F to 64°F.
A typical equipment room hot gas pressure control system is shown in Figure 5. Where
hot gas lines in the system are trapped, it is imperative that a condensate drainer be
installed at each trap and at the low point in the hot gas line. See Figure 6.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ALL STOP VALVES IN ALL OF THE HOT
GAS DEFROST SYSTEMS BE ANGLE VALVES; SEAL CAP VALVES
SHOULD ALSO BE EMPLOYED WHERE THE VALVES ARE IN THE
REFRIGERATED SPACE.
Defrost condensate liquid return piping (DC) from coils where a float or thermostatic
valve is employed should be sized one size larger than the liquid feed piping to the
coil.
The Soft Hot Gas Defrost System is a must for large evaporators. They should be used
on all coils 15 T.R. or over. This SDS system eliminates the valve clatter; pipe
movements and noise associated with large coils during hot gas defrost.
The SDS system can be employed for upfeed or downfeed coils, however the
piping systems differ. Figure 7 shows the SDS piping arrangement for upfeed
coils. Figure 8 shows the SDS piping arrangement for downfeed coils. WHERE
COILS ARE OPERATED IN THE HORIZONTAL PLANE THEY MUST BE
ORIFICED. VERTICAL COILS WHICH USUALLY ARE CROSS FED ARE
ORIFICED TOO.
The SDS system is designed to gradually increase the coil pressure as the defrost is
initiated. This is accomplished by using a small hot gas feed with a capacity of about
25 to 30% of the estimated duty with a solenoid and a hand expansion valve adjusted
to bring the pressure up to about 40 psig in 3 to 5 minutes. After defrost a small
suction line solenoid is opened so that the coil can be gradually broug4t down to
operation pressure before liquid is introduced and the fans started.
The SDS can be initiated by a pressure switch just as the demand defrost system;
however, for large coils in Spiral or IQF freezing systems manual initiation is usually
recommended.
There are lots of advantages to this Soft Hot Gas Defrost System.
♦ It eliminates check valve chatter.
♦ It eliminates most, if not all of the liquid hammer, i.e. hydraulic problems
in the piping.
Note: Advantages (items 4, 5 and 6) of the Demand .Defrost system apply to the
SDS System also.
"Static Head" penalty is the pressure/temperature loss associated with a refrigerant vapor stream
bubbling thru a liquid bath. If the velocity in the riser is high enough it will "carry over" a certain
amount of liquid and the penalty is reduced. If you divide 144 by the refrigerant density in
pounds/cf at a given temperature and pressure you obtain the equivalent feet of liquid column
per psi change. As an example, at -40°F ammonia weighs 43.08 pounds/ct. 144 divided by 43.08
equals 3.34 feet/psi change. Thus a 16 foot riser would have 16 divided by 3.34 equals 4.8 psi.
At -40°F ammonia is 10.41 psia plus 4.8 equals 15.21 psia at the bottom of the riser or -27°P.
This is a 13° difference or about 0.81°P penalty per foot of riser. If we selected a riser that was
oversized to a point that the vapor did not carry the liquid to the wet return, the evaporator would
be at -27°P instead of -400P.
Observations of a large evaporator (100 TR +/-) with a single riser slightly oversized,
where obviously there was some liquid carried over, operating at full load, provided
some interesting data. Par several minutes the liquid temperature at the bottom of the
riser would stay at -4()OF and the top of the riser the temperature was -42/-43 of. Then
the temperature at the bottom of the riser started to rise, and continued to rise until it
reached -29 to -30°F. At that time the slug of liquid in the riser was propelled into the
recirculated suction and the temperature at the bottom of the coil returned to -40°F. This
sequence took about 12 minutes.
♦ Install the recirculated suction line (LTRS) below the evaporator. This is
very effective for down feed evaporators.
Note that the suction from the coil should not be trapped. This piping
arrangement also assures oil return to the recirculator.
Dual risers have been employed in direct expansion air conditioning systems for many
years. An article by D.K. Miller published in Chemical Engineering magazine in
September 24, 1979 suggests that this is a solution to the problem. The authors have
employed double risers for large evaporators since approximately 1974.
Besides the D.K. Miller paper, the Carrier Refrigerant Piping Manual has some good
data regarding double risers.
Why are double risers needed? If we size a single riser for "minimum pressure drop" at
full load then at part load the static head penalty would be excessive plus oil return
could prove to be a problem. If we size the single riser for "minimum load" then the'
pressure drop in the riser would become excessive and counter productive.
Double risers solve this problem. Referring to figure 10 when the maximum load occurs
when both risers return vapors/liquid to the wet suction. When the load is at a
minimum this large riser is sealed by the liquid ammonia in the large trap and the
refrigerant vapor flows thru the small riser. The use of a small trap on this riser
assures some oil and liquid return to the wet suction.
Size the risers so the pressure drop calculated on a dry gas basis is at least 0.3 psi/l00
feet. Set the larger riser for approximately 65 to 75% of the flow and the small one for
100% minus 65 to 75%. This will result in velocity of approximately 5000 FPM or
higher. Some coils may require 3 risers (large, medium and small sizes).
Over the years the size of &11 types of freezers has continued to become larger and
larger. As they got larger so did the evaporators (coils). Where these freezers are "in
line" and the product to be frozen is 'wet" the defrost cycle can be every 4 hours or 8
hours. Many production lines limit the defrost cycle to 30 minutes. Where this is the
situation and the coils are large (some freezers today have 200 to 3.00 TR of coils), it is
difficult to design a hot gas defrost system that can complete a safe defrost in 30
minutes. Sequential defrost systems where the coils are defrosted alternately during
production are feasible but require special treatment. This should be covered in another
paper.
This also brings us to a plausible alternative which is a water defrost system which
should be covered in another paper.
10.0 CONCLUSION
1. Hot gas defrost system requires detailed engineering analysis as they become
larger & larger.
2. Other types of defrost, particularly 'water", should be considered where
large evaporators require a short defrost interval.
3. Familiarize yourself with the articles mentioned in the bibliography before
designing a defrost system for large evaporators.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
This assumes a hot gas outlet pr. Regulator in the equipment room. If high pr
Hot Gas is used, an outlet pr. Regulator with electric shut-off should be
substituted for SV-HGD & set at 75 to 90 PSIG
LEGEND
SOFT HOT GAS DEFROST CYCLE
FOR COILS ABOVE 15 TR - FIGURES 7 & 8
E Wait one minute and open the small solenoid valve SV-LTRS. Wait 2-4 mnts
F De-energize SV-HGD3 which opens (A) and close SV-LTRS. G. Energize
SV-LTRS
G Energize SV-LTRL
H Start Fans
This assumes outlet pressure regulator in the equipment room. If high pressure hot gas is
used , an outlet pressure regulator installed at the HGD inllet.