Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Surya Deb
ANSYS Inc.
November 21, 2019
1
Agenda
2
Brief Description of
Multiphase Flows
Definition of Multiphase Flow
• Any fluid flow consisting of more than one phase or component
• Components are not well mixed at the molecular level
• So flow will have phase separation well above the molecular level
4
Types of Multiphase Flows
Can be classified according to the state of different components or phases
Multiphase
Flows
7
Multiphase Flow Models
in ANSYS Fluent
Broad Classification of Multiphase Models
Separated Dispersed
flows flows
Euler-Euler Euler-Lagrange
VOF Model
Models Models
9
Established Gas-Liquid Models
10
Euler-Euler Models in Fluent
Euler-Euler
Models droplets, bubbles or particles dispersed in a continuous fluid phase. The
dispersed particles act as a continuum and are not tracked individually.
➢ Eulerian Model
Accurately models multiple separate, yet interacting, phases including liquids, gases or solids in any combination.
➢ Mixture Model
Simplifies the Eulerian model when load of the dispersed phase is small.
➢ Euler-Granular
Uses Eulerian approach to model dispersed particles in a continuous fluid. Uniform-sized particle motion is modeled
using averages, not individually.
11
Governing Equations
Mixture Model
• The mixture model is designed for two or more phases (fluid or particulate).
• The phases are considered as interpenetrating continua.
• It solves for the mixture momentum equation with or without relative velocities.
• Applications include particle-laden flows with low loading, bubbly flows, sedimentation ,
and cyclone separators.
𝜕
ρm + ∇. ρm vm = 0
𝜕t
𝜕
ρm vm + ∇. ρm vm vm = −∇p + ∇. μm ∇vm + ∇v T m + ρm g + F − ∇. (σnk=1 αk ρk vdr,k vdr,k )
𝜕t
n
σnk=1 αk ρk vk
vm = ρm = αk ρk vdr,k = vk − vm
ρm k=1
13
Mixture Model
• Fluent utilizes Algebraic Slip velocity for relative velocity between different phases
• It considers a local equilibrium between the phases exist at short spatial length
scales
• Drift and Relative Velocity are connected as follows:
n
αk ρk
vdr,p = vpq − ck vkq ck =
ρm
k=1
14
Eulerian Model
• The Eulerian multiphase model in ANSYS Fluent allows for the modeling of
multiple separate yet interacting phases.
• A single pressure is shared by all phases.
• Momentum and continuity equations are solved for each phase.
n
𝜕
αq ρq + ∇. αq ρq vq = mሶ pq − mሶ qp + Sq
𝜕t
p=1
15
Eulerian Model contd..
• Every phase has its own mass, momentum and energy conservation.
16
Population Balance Model
• Obtains solid-phase shear and bulk viscosities from application of kinetic theory to
granular flows.
s = − Ps I + 2 s s S + s (s − s ) u s I
2
3
S= 1
2
( T
u s + (u s ) ) Strain rate
Ps Solids Pressure
go Radial distribution function
s , s Solids bulk and shear viscosity
Solids Pressure
• Pressure exerted on the containing wall due to the presence of
particles
1
► Ma and Ahmadi (1990) Ps = αs ρs θs [(1 + 4αs g os ) + (1 + ess )(1 − ess + 2μfr )]
2
Granular Temperature
Eulerian Model
Applications
Modeling Oxygen Dissolution in Stirred Reactor
24
Model Description
• A three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation of a stirred airlift reactor has been carried
out using the Eulerian multiphase model.
• The two phases which are simulated are water and air.
• A 194 L reactor has been modeled with an impeller angular velocity of 250 RPM and gas
flow rate of 0.093 vvm (volume of liquid per minute).
• A Rushton impeller is used for simulation. The top surface has been modeled with a
degassing boundary condition.
• The universal drag law has been used with the drag correction term adjusted to improve
solution. For the poly-dispersed case, the population balance model is used for modeling
bubble size distribution.
• The quadrature method of moments (QMOM) model has been used with the aggregation
and breakage kernels. For modeling an oxygen dissolution process, Henry’s Law has been
used through the “Species Mass Transfer” option.
25
Mono-dispersed Simulation
26
Mono-dispersed contd..
27
Mono-dispersed Results
28
Mono-dispersed Results contd..
29
Poly-dispersed Simulation
30
Poly-dispersed Results
31
Poly-dispersed Results contd..
m3=m2*d=m1*d^2=m0*d^3
with m0 the O order moment of the particle size distribution
and is related to the number density of particles
per spatial volume.
σ 𝑁𝑖 𝐿3𝑖
𝑑32 =
Sauter Mean Diameter σ 𝑁𝑖 𝐿2𝑖
Diameter distribution
32
Degassing Boundary
Free Surface
• The free surface at the top of the column can also be approximated by the use of a degassing
boundary condition
➢ The absence of large gradients makes the numerics more stable in this case
➢ Degassing boundary condition is recommended for Bubble column simulations
• When the degassing boundary condition is specified for an outlet top face, the continuous liquid
phase sees the boundary as a free-slip wall and does not leave the domain.
• The dispersed gas phase sees the boundary as an outlet. The outlet pressure is not specified.
Instead, ANSYS Fluent automatically specifies a mass sink for the dispersed gas phase in the cells
adjacent to the degassing outlet.
• The mass sink is calculated using the flux normal to the boundary at the cell center.
34
Main Advantages of Degassing BC
• The main advantage of degassing boundary condition is reduced simulation time. It provides
faster turnarounds when compared with conventional approaches where the top air volume
is also modelled.
• The degassing boundary condition is available only for liquid-gas two-phase flow using the
Eulerian model. The primary phase must be liquid. In order for the gas to escape from the
degassing boundary, gravity must be switched on in the model.
• The degassing boundary condition is only recommended for modeling situations like bubble
columns without the freeboard region. Regarding post-processing, there is no normal
velocity or flux for either phase at the degassing boundary, since the gas escape is modeled
by a mass sink in the neighboring cells.
35
Fate of DPM Tracks at Degassing BC
The fate of particle tracks at a degassing boundary is the same as that on a
symmetry boundary type i.e. they reflect from the boundary faces.
37
Launch Fluidization contd..
For this lunar launch example
• Air is specified as the primary phase, and dust as the secondary phase.
• The granular inputs are empirical and are calibrated based on the user’s
knowledge of the granular material’s behavior
38
Launch Fluidization contd.. Mesh Initially Stationary causing
the fluidized dust to rise high
39
Mass fraction calculation in a multiphase simulation
Mass fraction of phase-i can be evaluated using the following expression via custom-field-function:
mass fraction of phase-i = (phase-i volume fraction)*(phase-i density)/(mixture-density) ... Eq. (1)
To evaluate the average mass fraction of a phase across a flow boundary, it can be obtained using:
mass fraction of phase-i = (mass flow rate of phase-i/mixture mass flow rate) ... Eq. (2)
At a flow boundary, the mass-weighted average of the mass fraction values obtained using Eq.(1) will be nearly
equal to that obtained using Eq.(2) if the interphase slip is negligible.
40
Summary
Choosing a Multiphase Model
General Guidelines
Euler-Euler
Bubbly/Droplet with high particle Bubbly/Droplet with significantly low Bubble Columns, Stirred Mixing tank with Stratified flows with a free surface,
relative phase velocities and low importance given to bubble/droplet Slug flows in Pipes/chambers,
loading (>10%), Pneumatic transport breakup and agglomeration, Crystallization
with secondary phase as Granular, particle loading, Pneumatic phenomenon where Nucleation is Modeling immiscible fluids with
Fluidized Beds, Sedimentation transport, slurry flows important sharp interface
42
Thank You