88 SEAC-3 Day 02

SEAC Meeting number: 88 Meeting Date May 29, 2019

Subject: Environment Clearance for Proposed Commercial project (IT Building) at S.No.
102/1/1Part/1,102/1/1Part/1,102/1/1Part/1,102/1/1/2,102/1/1/3,102/1/2,102/1/2,102/1/3,102/1/4/1,102/1/4/2,102/1/4/4,
Baner, Pune by Bedi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Is a Violation Case: No

Proposed Commercial project (IT Building) at S.No.

1.Name of Project
2.Type of institution
3.Name of Project Proponent
4.Name of Consultant
5.Type of project
6.New project/expansion in existing
102/1/1Part/1,102/1/1Part/1,102/1/1Part/1,102/1/1/2,102/1/1/3,102/1/2,102/1/2,102/1/3,102/1/4/1,102/1/4/2,102/1/4/4,
Baner, Pune by Bedi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Private
Mr. Rahul Bankar
VK:e Environmental LLP
New Commercial project

1
project/modernization/diversification New Commercial project
in existing project

27
7.If expansion/diversification,
whether environmental clearance
Not applicable
has been obtained for existing
project

00
S. No 102/1/1Part/1, 102/1/1Part/1, 102/1/1Part/1, 102/1/1/2,102/1/1/3, 102/1/2,102/1/2, 102/1/3, 102/1/4/1,
8.Location of the project
102/1/4/2,102/1/4/4, Baner, Pune.
9.Taluka Haveli

00
10.Village Baner
Correspondence Name: Mr. Rahul Bankar
Room Number: NA
Floor: Ground
00
Building Name: Amar House
0
Road/Street Name: S.No. 892, Bhandarkar Road
Locality: Deccan Gymkhana
A-

City: Pune 411004

11.Area of the project Pune Municipal Corporation
D

Under Process
12.IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan
IOD/IOA/Concession/Plan Approval Number: 00
Approval Number
EN

Approved Built-up Area: 00

13.Note on the initiated work (If
NA
applicable)
14.LOI / NOC / IOD from MHADA/
G

NA
Other approvals (If applicable)
15.Total Plot Area (sq. m.) 12154 Sq.m
-A

16.Deductions 1386 Sq.m

17.Net Plot area 10768 Sq.m
AC

a) FSI area (sq. m.): 32303.40

18 (a).Proposed Built-up Area (FSI &
b) Non FSI area (sq. m.): 23217.05
Non-FSI)
c) Total BUA area (sq. m.): 55520
SE

Approved FSI area (sq. m.): 00

18 (b).Approved Built up area as per
Approved Non FSI area (sq. m.): 00
DCR
Date of Approval: 07-05-2019
19.Total ground coverage (m2) 3884.44
20.Ground-coverage Percentage (%)
(Note: Percentage of plot not open 36.07
to sky)
21.Estimated cost of the project 1200000000

22.Number of buildings & its configuration

Serial
Building Name & number Number of floors Height of the building (Mtrs)
number
LBP+UBP+G+ 2P + 12 Floor
1 1 Commercial building 53.7
Commercial Offices

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 140 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
23.Number of
12 Offices
tenants and shops
24.Number of
expected residents / Total commercial population 3152
users
25.Tenant density
Not applicable as it is a commercial project, only floating population will be there.
per hectare
26.Height of the
building(s)
27.Right of way
(Width of the road
Project is accessible from 12 m wide service road and 60 m Mumbai-Pune Bypass road. Nearest
from the nearest fire
fire station is Aundh fire station: 4.8 Km
station to the
proposed building(s)
28.Turning radius

1
for easy access of

27
fire tender
movement from all Minimum 6m Driveway & 9m Turning radius is provided.
around the building
excluding the width

00
for the plantation
29.Existing
NA

00
structure (s) if any
30.Details of the
demolition with 00
NA
disposal (If
applicable)

31.Production Details
0
A-

Serial
Product Existing (MT/M) Proposed (MT/M) Total (MT/M)
Number
D

1 Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

32.Total Water Requirement

EN

Source of water Pune Municipal Corporation

Fresh water (CMD): 79
G

Recycled water -
63
-A

Flushing (CMD):
Recycled water -
8.5
Gardening (CMD):
AC

Swimming pool
NA
make up (Cum):
SE

Dry season: Total Water

Requirement (CMD) 151
:
Fire fighting -
Underground water 200
tank(CMD):
Fire fighting -
Overhead water 25
tank(CMD):
Excess treated water 56.5

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 141 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 Source of water Pune Municipal Corporation
Fresh water (CMD): 79
Recycled water -
63
Flushing (CMD):
Recycled water -
00
Gardening (CMD):
Swimming pool
NA
make up (Cum):
Wet season: Total Water
Requirement (CMD) 142
:
Fire fighting -
Underground water 200
tank(CMD):

1
Fire fighting -

27
Overhead water 25
tank(CMD):
Excess treated water 65

00
Details of Swimming
NA
pool (If any)

00
33.Details of Total water consumed
Particula
Consumption (CMD) Loss (CMD) Effluent (CMD)
rs
00
Water
Require Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total Existing Proposed Total
0
ment
A-

Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not Not

Domestic
applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable
D

Summer Season – 24.00 m. to 29.00 m. BGL. (26.50 M. Average) Rainy

EN

Level of the Ground

Season – 10.00 m. to 16.00 BGL. (13.00 M. Average) Winter Season –
water table:
17.00 m. to 22.50 m. BGL. (19.75 M. Average)
Size and no of RWH
G

tank(s) and NA
Quantity:
-A

Location of the RWH

NA
tank(s):
AC

34.Rain Water Quantity of recharge

4 Nos. with recharge bore & 7 No. of soak pits.
Harvesting pits:
(RWH) Size of recharge pits
2.00 X 2.00 X 1.50 m. with 6” dia. 55 to 60 m. deep bore
SE

:
Budgetary allocation
Rs. 8.50 Lakh.
(Capital cost) :
Budgetary allocation
Rs. 1.00 Lakh / year.
(O & M cost) :
Fire Tank: 200 kld
Details of UGT tanks
Domestic: 79 ,000 ltr
if any :
Flushing: 63,000 ltr

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 142 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 The storm water drainage will be designed according to contours. The
Natural water storm water collected through the storm water drains of adequate
drainage pattern: capacity will be led to recharge pits. Excess storm water will be
35.Storm water discharged into common municipal storm water drainage.
drainage Quantity of storm 6,605.86 m3 / Year i.e. 132.12 m3 / Day, Considering 849.30 mm.
water: annual rain fall in 50 days averagely.
Size of SWD: 450mm dia PVC Foam core pipe

Sewage generation
128
in KLD:
STP technology: MBBR
Capacity of STP
1 no. of STP of Capacity 130 kld
(CMD):
Sewage and
Location & area of

1
Waste water the STP:
On Ground near OWC, Area: 70.2 Sq.m

27
Budgetary allocation
Rs 41,00,000/-
(Capital cost):

00
Budgetary allocation
Rs 9,36,900/-
(O & M cost):

36.Solid waste Management

00
Total waste generated: 20 Kg/day Dry Waste = 8 kg/day , Wet Waste =
Waste generation in Waste generation: 12 kg / day 00
the Pre Construction
and Construction Disposal of the The Construction waste generated during construction shall be
phase: construction waste segregated, reused on site and surplus shall be led to scrap dealers for
debris: recycling.
0
Dry waste: 472.8 kg/day
A-

Wet waste: 315.2 kg/day

Hazardous waste: NA
D

Waste generation
in the operation Biomedical waste (If
NA
EN

applicable):
Phase:
STP Sludge (Dry
19.32 kg/day
sludge):
G

Others if any: 8.6 kg/day

-A

Dry waste: Will be Handed over to authorized Vendor

Wet waste: Wet waste will be treated in Organic Waste Convertor
AC

Hazardous waste: NA
Mode of Disposal Biomedical waste (If
of waste: NA
applicable):
SE

STP Sludge (Dry

Dried sludge from STP will be used as manure
sludge):
Others if any: e waste will be handover to authorized e waste Vendor
Location(s): On Ground
Area for the storage
Area
of waste & other Area: 14 Sq m
requirement: material:
Area for machinery: Area: 31 sq m
Budgetary allocation Capital cost: Rs 12,75,000/-
(Capital cost and
O&M cost): O & M cost: Rs 2,81,430/-

37.Effluent Charecterestics

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 143 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 Serial Inlet Effluent Outlet Effluent Effluent discharge
Parameters Unit
Number Charecterestics Charecterestics standards (MPCB)
Not
1 Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
applicable
Amount of effluent generation
Not applicable
(CMD):
Capacity of the ETP: Not applicable
Amount of treated effluent
Not applicable
recycled :
Amount of water send to the CETP: Not applicable
Membership of CETP (if require): Not applicable
Note on ETP technology to be used Not applicable
Disposal of the ETP sludge Not applicable

1
38.Hazardous Waste Details

27
Serial
Description Cat UOM Existing Proposed Total Method of Disposal
Number

00
Not Not Not Not Not
1 Not applicable Not applicable
applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable

39.Stacks emission Details

00
Height
Internal
Serial Fuel Used with from Temp. of Exhaust
Section & units Stack No. diameter
Number Quantity
00 ground
(m)
Gases
level (m)
Not Not Not
0
1 Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
applicable applicable applicable
A-

40.Details of Fuel to be used

Serial
D

Type of Fuel Existing Proposed Total

Number
EN

1 Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

41.Source of Fuel Not applicable
42.Mode of Transportation of fuel to site Not applicable
G
-A

Total RG area : 1377.13 Sq.m

No of trees to be cut
All 6 trees will be retained.
AC

:
Number of trees to
Proposed trees 134
43.Green Belt be planted :
SE

Development List of proposed

Refer Below list
native trees :
Timeline for
completion of Till operation phase
plantation :

44.Number and list of trees species to be planted in the ground

Serial Characteristics & ecological
Name of the plant Common Name Quantity
Number importance
Good for roadside plantation and
1 Ailanthus Excelsa Maharukh 22
have medicinal properties
Anthocephallus Good for roadside plantation and
2 Kadamb 9
Cadamba provide shade.

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 144 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 Good for roadside plantation and
3 Polyalthia longifolia Mini Ashok 13
provide shade.
Have medicinal properties and
4 Cassia fistula Bahava 11
larval host for butterflies
Good as a avenue tree, good for
Lagerstroemia flos
5 Tamhan 7 group planting around water
regineae
gardens and ponds.
Good for restoration of dryer parts,
6 Azadirachta Indica Neem 4 good for air purifier and have
medicinal properties
7 Michelia Champaca Son chafa 11 Good for ornamental purpose
Quick growing and hardy tree.
8 Albizia lebbeck Shirish 20 Have flowers with delightful
fragrance.

1
Drought resistant, good air purifier
9 Bauhinia racemosa Apta 12
and have medicinal properties

27
Good for roadside plantation and
10 Magnifera indica Mango 9
provide shade.

00
11 Syzizium cuminia Jamun 7 It is beautiful evergreen tree.
The palm is graceful and
12 Caryota urens Fishtail palm 4
pretty.Moderate growth

00
Nitrogen fixing tree and larval host
13 Pongamia pinnata Karanj 5
00 for butterflies
45.Total quantity of plants on ground

46.Number and list of shrubs and bushes species to be planted in the podium RG:
0
Serial
Name C/C Distance Area m2
A-

Number
1 NA NA NA
D

47.Energy
EN

Source of power
MSEDCL
supply :
During Construction
G

Phase: (Demand 100 kW

Load)
-A

DG set as Power
back-up during 125 kVA
AC

construction phase
During Operation
phase (Connected 5052.42 kW
load):
SE

Power
During Operation
requirement: phase (Demand 3742.54 kVA
load):
Transformer: 2000 kVA x 2 Nos. and 630 kVA x 1 No.s
DG set as Power
back-up during 2 x 1500 kVA
operation phase:
Fuel used: HSD
Details of high
tension line passing
NA
through the plot if
any:

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 145 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 48.Energy saving by non-conventional method:
Energy saving Solar energy generation: 10.73 %

49.Detail calculations & % of saving:

Serial
Energy Conservation Measures Saving %
Number
LED lamps will be used for corridors ,Lobbies and
1 common areas instead of CFL or conventional 6.18 %
Incandescent lamp
Solar PV panel system is proposed for Street lighting
2 10.73%
& Building common lighting.

50.Details of pollution control Systems

Source Existing pollution control system Proposed to be installed

1
Not
Not applicable Not applicable
applicable

27
Budgetary allocation Capital cost: Rs. 16,84,000/-
(Capital cost and

00
O&M cost): O & M cost: Rs. 33,680/-

51.Environmental Management plan Budgetary Allocation

00
a) Construction phase (with Break-up):
Serial 00
Attributes Parameter Total Cost per annum (Rs. In Lacs)
Number
Erosion control, dust
1 Air Environment suppression measures, 10.33
0
top soil preservation
A-

Labour camp toilets &

2 Land Environment 4.80
sanitation
D

Labour safety &

3 Health and safety 4
training
EN

Health check up &

4 Health and safety 0.51
disinfection
Environment Environment
G

5 1.70
Management management cell
-A

Environmental Air, Water, Noise, Soil,

6 1.82
Monitoring (Per Year) DG set
AC

b) Operation Phase (with Break-up):

Serial Capital cost Rs. In Operational and Maintenance
Component Description
Number Lacs cost (Rs. in Lacs/yr)
SE

Sewage treatment
1 1 STP 41 9.36
plant
Organic waste
2 OWC Machine 12.75 2.81
management
Development and
3 Landscaping 8.04 4.23
Maintenance
4 Rain water harvesting Recharge pits 8.50 1
PV panels for Street
5 Energy 16.84 0.33
Light
Air,water,Noise,soil,owc
Environment
6 manure,DG,Treated - 1.85
Monitoring
water

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 146 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 51.Storage of chemicals (inflamable/explosive/hazardous/toxic
substances)
Maximum
Quantity
of
Storage Consumption
Storage Source of Means of
Description Status Location Capacity / Month in
at any Supply transportation
in MT MT
point of
time in
MT
Not Not Not Not
Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
applicable applicable applicable applicable

52.Any Other Information

No Information Available

1
53.Traffic Management

27
Nos. of the junction
to the main road & The site is located in Baner Area. The development will be accessible
design of from 12 m wide service road while the internal driveways are 7.5 m

00
confluence:
Number and area of
2 basements proposed

00
basement:
Number and area of
NA
podia: 00
Total Parking area: 17746.71 sqm
Area per car: 12.5
0
Area per car: 12.5
A-

Number of 2-
Wheelers as
D

Parking details: approved by 1987

competent
EN

authority:
Number of 4-
Wheelers as
approved by 827
G

competent
authority:
-A

Public Transport: NA
Width of all Internal
AC

Min 7.5 m
roads (m):
CRZ/ RRZ clearance
NA
obtain, if any:
SE

Distance from
Protected Areas /
Critically Polluted
NA
areas / Eco-sensitive
areas/ inter-State
boundaries
Category as per
schedule of EIA 8 a Building and Construction Project
Notification sheet
Court cases pending
NA
if any
Other Relevant
NA
Informations

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 147 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
 Have you previously
submitted
No
Application online
on MOEF Website.
Date of online
-
submission

SEAC DISCUSSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

Environmental
Impacts of the Satisfactory.
project
Water Budget Satisfactory.
Waste Water
Satisfactory.
Treatment

1
Drainage pattern of
Satisfactory.
the project

27
Ground water
Satisfactory.
parameters

00
Solid Waste
Satisfactory.
Management
Air Quality & Noise
Satisfactory.

00
Level issues
Energy Management Satisfactory.
Traffic circulation
00
system and risk Satisfactory.
assessment
0
Landscape Plan Satisfactory.
A-

Disaster
management system Satisfactory.
and risk assessment
D

Socioeconomic
Satisfactory.
EN

impact assessment
Environmental
Satisfactory.
Management Plan
G

Any other issues

related to
Satisfactory.
-A

environmental
sustainability
AC

Brief information of the project by SEAC

PP submitted their application for prior Environmental clearance for total plot area of
SE

12154 m2, FSI area of 32303.40 m2, Non FSI area of 23217.05 m2 and total BUA of 55520
m2.

The case was discussed on the basis of the documents submitted and presentation made by
the proponent. All issues relating to environment, including air, water, land, soil, ecology,
biodiversity and social aspects were examined. The proposal is appraised as category
8(a)B2.

DECISION OF SEAC

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 148 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)
During discussion following points emerged:

1. PP to submit CFO NOC.

SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for prior environmental Clearance, subject to
PP complying with the above condition.

Specific Conditions by SEAC:

1) PP to submit CFO NOC.

1
FINAL RECOMMENDATION

27
SEAC-III have decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for Prior Environmental clearance subject to above
conditions

00
00
0 00
A-
D
EN
G
-A
AC
SE

Joy S.Thakur (Secretary SEAC Meeting No: 88 Meeting Date: May 29, Page 149 Shri. Anil Kale (Chairman
SEAC-III) 2019 of 159 SEAC-III)