Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
of Commercial Building
Submitted to
Bhimdutta Municipality, MahendraNagar,
Kanchanpur
Contents
List of Tables iv
List of Figuresv
Chapter 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 6
1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 6
1.2 Objectives and Scope of Work..............................................................................................................6
1.3 Structural Components.......................................................................................................................... 6
1.4 Codes, Standards and References.......................................................................................................7
1.5 Structural Design Methodology..............................................................................................................7
Chapter 5 Loads........................................................................................................................................ 13
5.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 13
5.2 Gravity Load........................................................................................................................................ 13
5.3 Seismic Load....................................................................................................................................... 14
5.3.1 Code-based Design...................................................................................................................... 14
5.4 Analysis Procedures............................................................................................................................15
5.4.1 Code Based Design...................................................................................................................... 15
5.5 Component and Member Design.........................................................................................................17
Chapter 8 Summary.................................................................................................................................. 29
8.1 Summary............................................................................................................................................. 29
8.1.1 Beam design summary.................................................................................................................29
8.1.2 Column Design Summary.............................................................................................................31
8.1.3 Footing Design Summary..............................................................................................................32
Page ii
8.1.4 Slab Design Summary..................................................................................................................32
8.1.5 Staircase Design Summary...........................................................................................................32
Page iii
List of Tables
Table 1:Typical Structural Member and Components........................................................................7
Page iv
List of Figures
Page v
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
This report presents the structure analysis and design of Residential Building. The building is Special Reinforced Concrete
Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) type of building. It is designed to meet both strength and serviceability requirements when
subjected to gravity and earthquake loads.
The analysis and design has been based on IS codes & Nepal building code that are in practice in Nepal. This report consists
of the design assumptions, design methodology, design inputs and outputs, and sample design of structural members.
Page 6
Table 1:Typical Structural Member and Components
Page 7
The structural elements of reinforced concrete were designed to Limit State Theory, while
the structural steel elements were designed to the Permissible Stress Theory. The major
structural elements were automatically designed in the programmer to IS 456 for
reinforced concrete structures elements, while the certain design calculations for those
not properly figured due to the limitation of program were manually carried out in
accordance with the relevant latest standards.
2.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the design philosophy and approach used in structural design of
buildings.
The set of equivalent static forces specified above were assumed to act simultaneously at
each level in the direction being considered and were applied through points eccentric to
the centre of rigidity.
Page 8
Figure 1: Subsoil type Vs Time period
Importance factor(I):
Importance factor for the calculation of seismic is taken as on the following type
Table 3: Importance factor
Zone factore(z):
zone factors for different municipalities and other regions are given in below table and
region
Page 9
Structural performance factor(k):
The minimum permissible value of the structural performance factor, K, and associated
detailing requirements shall be as given in Table 8.2.
The structural type may be different in each of two directions in a building and in that
case the appropriate value for K shall be selected for each direction.
When more than one structural type is used in the structure, for the direction under
consideration, the structural performance factor for the element providing the majority of
the seismic load resistance shall be applied provided that the elements of the other
structural types have the ability to accept the resulting deformations.
Table 4: Structural Performance factor
1 Ductile moment-resisting frame Must comply with the detailing for ductility 1.0
requirements.
2 Frame as in 1 with reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete shear walls must 1.0
shear walls comply with appropriate3 detailing for
ductility requirement
3 Frame as in 1(a) with masonry infills Must comply with the detailing for ductility 21.2
requirements.
4 Frame as in 1 with either steel bracing Steel bracing members must comply with 1.5 1.2
members detailed for ductility or reinforced the detailing for ductility requirements NBC
concrete infill panels 111-94.
Page 10
Planning & Architectural drawings
Analysis (linear static or dyanmic)& Checks( torsional irregularity, drift, soft storey, mass irregularity
3.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the strength of materials used in the design of structural
components.
3.2 Concrete
The minimum compressive, used in different types of structural components are shown in
the following table.
Table 5: Compressive Strength of concrete
Page 11
3.3 Reinforcing Steel
Minimum yield strength of reinforcing steel to be used in the design is shown in the
following table.
Table 6 :Yield Strength of Reinforcing steel
fy (Nominal) fy (Expected)
Diameter
(MPa) (MPa)
10mm and below 415 456.5
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the finite element modeling of the building, including modeling
assumptions of materials, sections, and components properties.
4.2.1 Beams
Frame elements were used in modeling of beams, which includes the effects of bending,
torsion, axial deformation, and shear deformations. Insertion points and end offsets were
applied to account for the finite size of beam and column intersections, if required. The
end offsets may be made partially or fully rigid based on engineering judgment to model
the stiffening effect that can occur when the ends of an element were embedded in beam
and column intersections.
4.2.3 Columns
Frame elements were used in modeling of columns, which includes the effects of biaxial
bending, torsion, axial deformation, and biaxial shear deformations. Insertion points and
Page 12
end offsets were applied to account for the finite size of beam and column intersections, if
required. The end offsets may be made partially or fully rigid based on engineering
judgment to model the stiffening effect that can occur when the ends of an element were
embedded in beam and column intersections.
Chapter 5 Loads
5.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the design loads considered in the structural design, including
gravity loads and seismic loads.
S.N Wall type Unit Wall Floor Slab Beam Clear Load
weight(k Thickness Height( Depth( Depth( Height( Applied(kN
N/m3) (mm) mm) mm) mm) mm) /m)
1 FULL BRICK 19.2 250 3048 125 300 2623 11.583
WALL
Full Brick 8.108
Wall with
Openings
(applied
70% of (1))
2 HALF 19.2 120 3048 125 300 2623 5.792
BRICK
WALL(PART
ITION)
Half Brick 4.054
Wall with
Openings
(applied
70% of (2))
3 Parapet 19.2 120 0 0 0 120 2.650
Wall 0
Page 13
Table 7 : Live Load and Imposed Dead Load
Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load
intensity
2
3 KN/m )
Seismic wt. at ith floor level (W I) = (Total dead load of all components i.e. Beam, Slab,
Columns And Walls for ½ height above and ½ height below the floor level + 25% of live
load)
n
Total Weight of the frame, W= Wi Where, n = total number of storey
I=1
2 1.2(DL+LL±EL)
3 1.5(DL±EL)
4 0.9DL ± 1.5 EL
Page 14
5.4 Analysis Procedures
5.4.1 Code Based Design
Analysis procedure of the code-based design was shown in the table below.
Table 9: Analysis Procedures for Code Base Design
Where, Cd = CZIK
Page 15
Page 16
5.4.1.2 Linear Static Procedure (LSP)
Linear static analysis was carried out for gravity and earthquake loadings.
6.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the analysis and design results of the building. The structural
components were designed to resist the elastic demand forces considering R factor
using seismic coefficient analysis method.
Page 17
Figure 2: Axial Force diagram (udcon1 )
Page 18
6.2.1 Base Shear
The base shear was compared in the above tie beam level. Total weight of building
above tie beam level and base shear is shown as in table in capture 7 below.Base
shear distribution is given below
Drift check(Y-direction)
Drift check(X-direction)
Stor LoadCase height( Absolute Relative permissible chec
ey m) Drift(mm) Drift(mm) drift k
Groun EqY 3.048 0 0 12.192 OK
d
1st EqY 3.048 3.38 3.38 12.192 OK
2nd EqY 3.048 6.4 3.02 12.192 OK
6.2.3 Deformation
Maximum deformation of the building for static earthquake load condition for X and Y direction was checked
from SAP2000 model. Deformed value of the structure is tabulated in capture 7. Deflected shape of building
in x-dir and y-dir due to Eqx & Eqy respectively are shown below
Page 19
Figure 6:Displacement of 3d model (EqX)
Page 20
Figure 7: FOUNDATION, BEAM & COLUMN PLAN
Typical Footing Design for Building Block (COMBINED FOOTING FOR CRITICAL JOINT)
Page 21
Isolated Footing Design
Input Calculation Output Date : 26 March 2020
Footing Mark B2 Grade of Concrete (f ck )
Length of Column (l ) 0.35 m Grade of Steel (f y )
Width of Column (b ) 0.35 m Axial Force (P ) 276.67 kN
Diameter of Bar in Column (φ c) 16 mm Bending Moment about X-X (M x-x ) -1.50 kN-m
2 1.5
Length of Footing (L ) 1.53 m Bending Moment about Y-Y (M y-y ) 0.40 kN-m
Width of Footing (B ) 1.53 m Multiplying Factor for SBC 2 1
Depth of Footing (D ) 0.45 m Load Combination Type 2 1.5
Depth of Footing at the edge (d edge ) 0.15 m Type of Footing 2
Diameter of Bar (φ ) 12 mm Exposure Condition
Soil Bearing Capacity (SBC) 120.0 kN/sq. m Pressure Consideration for Design
Size of Footing is adequate for Initial Consideration of Soil Pressure.
No Tension in Footing.
Safe for One Way Shear Criteria in Short Direction.
Safe for One Way Shear Criteria in Long Direction.
Safe for Punching Shear Criteria.
Bearing Capacity is sufficient for Load Transfer.
Required Spacing for Bars along the Length of Footing 300 mm Provided Spacing for Bars along the Length of Footing 150 mm
Required Spacing for Bars along the Width of Footing 300 mm Provided Spacing for Bars along the Width of Footing 200 mm
Required Spacing for Bars along the Width in the Central Band 300 mm Provided Spacing for Bars along the Width in the Central Band 200 mm
Provide 12 mm φ @ 150 mm c/c along the length of the footing.
Provide 12 mm φ @ 200 mm c/c along the width of the footing.
Provide 12 mm φ @ 200 mm c/c along the width of the footing in the central band.
Extend 4 bars of 16 mm φ from column to footing with a development length of 760 mm
1.53 m
12 mm φ @ 200 mm c/c
0.35 m
0.35 m
1.53 m
12 mm φ @ 200 mm c/c
0.80 m 0.80 m
12 mm φ @ 150 mm c/c
Page 22
7.2 Typical Slab Design
SLAB DESIGN
Input Calculation Output Date : 26 March 2020
2
Slab Mark S1 Floor Finish (w sdl) 1.50 kN/m
2
Overall Depth (D) 125 mm Live Load (w sl) 2.50 kN/m
2
Effective Cover (d') 20 mm Other Loads (w vl) 0.00 kN/m
2
Grade of Concrete (fck) 7 Self Weight (wdl) 3.13 kN/m
2
Grade of Steel (fy) Total Load (w) 7.13 kN/m
2
Clear Span in Shorter Direction (l x) 4.97 m Factored Total Load (w u) 10.69 kN/m
Clear Span in Longer Direction (l y ) 4.50 m Edge Support Condition
Reinforcement Details
Diameter of Bars along Shorter Direction at Mid-span (φ x-mid ) 8 mm Diameter of Bars along Shorter Direction at Support (φ x-sup ) 8 mm
Diameter of Bars along Longer Direction at Mid-span (φ y-mid ) 8 mm Diameter of Bars along Longer Direction at Support (φ y-sup) 8 mm
Spacing for Bars along Shorter Direction at Mid-span (s x-mid) #N/A Spacing for Bars along Shorter Direction at Support (sx-sup) #N/A
Provided Spacing for Bars along Shorter Direction at Mid-span 150 mm Provided Spacing for Bars along Shorter Direction at Support 200 mm
Spacing for Bars along Longer Direction at Mid-span (s y-mid) 125 mm Spacing for Bars along Longer Direction at Support (s y-sup) 75 mm
Provided Spacing for Bars along Longer Direction at Mid-span 250 mm Provided Spacing for Bars along Longer Direction at Support 450 mm
#N/A
Corners Lift-up? 1 Ast, torsion 251.33 mm2
Diameter of Bars in Mesh (φ t) 10 mm Spacing of Bars in Mesh (st) 300 mm
Provide 10 mm φ @ 300 mm c/c both ways at top and bottom at each corner over an area 1000 mm × 1000 mm
Strength Criteria
pt,lim 0.96 % pt,provided 0.32 %
Design is Safe for Strength Criteria
Deflection Criteria
Middle Support
(l/d)max #N/A #N/A
Shorter Direction
(l/d)provided 48.34 48.34
(l/d)max N/A N/A
Longer Direction
(l/d)provided N/A N/A
Design is Safe for Deflection Criteria
Shear Criteria
Design is Safe for Shear Criteria
10 φ @ 300 mm
8 φ @ 150 mm 8 φ @ 200 mm
4.97 m
8 φ @ 250 mm 8 φ @ 450 mm
4.50 m
Page 23
7.3 Typical Staircase Design
Assuming the waist slab thickness approximately as 35-40 mm for every metre
longitudinal span.
Waist Slab thickness = (Wst) = (L1+L2+L3)x40 = 140mm
Dead weight of Waist Slab on inclined area (Dlws) = Wst x 0.025
Dlws = 140 x 0.025 = 3.5kN/m2
Dead weight of Waist slab on Horizontal area (Dlwsh) =
Dlws x SQRT(Rise2 + Tread2)/Tread =
3.5x SQRT(150^2 +250^2)/(250) = 4.082kN/m2
Dead Weight of Steps (Dwsteps) = 0.5 x Rise x Conc Density =
Dwsteps = 0.5 x 150 x 25 / 1000 = 1.875kN/m2
Live Load on the Stair Case (as per IS 875) = 3.000kN/m2
Finishes Load on the Stair Case (if any) (Fin. Load = 1.000kN/m2
Loading on Spans L1 and or L3 per metre run (Landing Portion) :
Wl1 = Wl3 = (Dlws + Lload + Finload) = (3.5 + 3 + 1) = 7.500kN/m
Loading on Span L2 per metre run (Flight Portion)
Page 24
Wl2 = ((Dlwsh+Dwsteps+Lload+Finload)xwidth + Raiload)/width
Wl2 = ((4.082 + 1.875 + 3 + 1) x 1.22 + 1) /1.22 = 10.777kN/m
A L1 = 0 L2 = 2.28 L3 = 1.22 B
Ra18.163 15.559Rb
Reactions Ra and Rb
Taking moments of all forces about B
Ra x 3.5 = 0x0x(1.22+2.28+0x0.5) + 10.777x2.28(1.22+ 0.5x2.28) +7.5x1.22x0.5x1.22=
Ra x 4.8 = 63.5704kN
Reaction at the support A = 18.163kN
Rb = (0x0 + 10.777x2.28 + 7.5x1.22) - 18.163 = = 15.559kN
Maximum BM Occurs at the point 'x' where SF is Zero or Changes its sign.
Point of Maximum Moment = 1.444m
Max BM: 18.163 x 1.444 - 0 x 0 x (1.444-0.5x0) - 10.777 x 0.5 x (1.444 - 0)^2
= 14.991kNm
Factored BM = 1.5 x 14.991 = 22.487kNm
Required Effective Depth from Bending Point of View:
Mu limit = 0.138fck bd2
d (reqd) = Sqrt((Factored BM/(0.138 x fck) = Sqrt((22.487 x 1e+03) /(0.138x 20))
d (reqd) = 90.263mm However Provide an Effective depth of 100mm
Provide an overall depth of 120mm
Factor Mu/bd2 = 22.4871e+03/100^2 = 2.25
Required percentage of steel (pt) = 0.735%
Area of Steel Required = 735mm2 12# @ 153.741mm c/c
However provided steel = 12# @ 70mm c/c %Ast prov = 1.614%
1.4126
Ast Provided = 1614mm2 Modification Factor for Tensile steel = 5
Page 25
Allowable Span to effective depth = 36.729
Actual Span to effective depth = 35.000 Hence Safe
Provide 8 mm minimum distribution steel @ 0.12% of gross area = 138mm2
Provide 8# @ 360 mm c/c
Chapter 8 Summary
8.1 Summary
Structural design was carried out for buildings. Structural system was Special moment
resisting reinforced concrete frame system with in-filled wall. Special moment
resisting frame was analyzed with seismic load from NBC 105:1994 and reinforced
concrete members were designed with IS456. The outputs from both codes were
compared. The reinforced concrete section was taken from bigger value among the
values obtained from the codes. The foundations were designed as isolated footing
considering the bearing capacity of soil 120KN/m2 respectively. The proposed design
satisfies the key requirement of the building codes.
Page 26
Figure 9: Second Floor Reinforcment required
Beam Detail
Grid Size
of
S.N Descripti beam Positio At At Mid Stirrup Remark
o on n Ends s s
inc
h
1 Ground Floor,1st A,B,C,D,E 9"x12" Top 2- 2- 8mm dia M20
Floor 16ØTh+ 16ØTh. bar 2- Concrete
2-12ØEx Legged
@ 4" c/c
1,2,3,4,5, Bottom 2- 2- at 2d
6 16ØTh. 16ØTh+ distance
2-12ØEx from
2 Top Roof A,B,C,D,E 9"x12" Top 2- 2- beam
16ØTh. 16ØTh. joint &
6"
1,2,3,4,5, Bottom 2- 2- remainin
6 16ØTh. 16ØTh. g
distance
Page 27
8.1.2 Column Design Summary
Page 28
Figure 12:Grid-C Reinforment required
Column Reinforcement
Column Ground floor First floor STIRRUPS
Type
C-1 8-16Ø 8-16Ø 8mm DIA @ 4" C/C near joint & 6" C/C at mid
(14"X14")
Notes: C1- ALL
Page 29
8.1.3 Footing Design Summary
Note: F1-All
Page 30
Appendix A: Sample Design for RC Column
SAP2000 V20 Concrete Frame Design
Page 31
Appendix B: Sample Design for RC Beam
SAP2000 V20 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design
Page 32
APPENDIX C: COLUMN , BEAM CAPACITY RATIO CHECK
C/B ratio
Ratio of flexural capacity of Beam/column is computed to preclude the formation of plastic
hinges in columns for obvious reasons.
Sum of flexural capacities of column at a joint should be 1.2 times the capacities of beam
framing into the joint in particular direction.
When capacity is exceeded, we can increase the size of column, or reduce the size of beam,
or play with reinforcement of members. It has nothing to do with redistribution of moments;
If both end of column will yield, during a seismic event, in a particular story, structure will
most probably collapse. In a frame, that is resisting lateral loads, you cannot take away the
ability of beam to develop negative moment; if you do not provide top reinforcement, it will
not be called a moment resisting frame, and will not resist lateral loads.
Page 33
APPENDIX D: CHECKLIST FOR RCC STRUCTURE
Ministry of Urban Development
Department of Urban Development & Building Constrution
Building Code Division
Babarmahal, Kathmandu
NBC Compliance Check list on Structural Analysis & Design for RCC
Adopted
S.No Description Quantity Unit Remarks
Code
A General Information:
A.1 Owner’s Name:
Address:
Plot no:
Basements 0
Typical 3.048 m
Page 34
Length to width ratio of
B.10 1.43
building:
C Geological Investigation:
Geological Investigation
i) Yes No
Conducted
If No
Reinforcement Grade Used for
Fe415
shear:
i. Brick 18 kN/m3
kN/m
ii. Steel Section 75..8
3
kN/m
iii. RCC 25
3
Page 35
kN/m
iii. PCC 24
3
Seismic Load (AS per
D.8 NBC105 or
IS 1893:2002) :-
D.8.1 Zone Factor (Z): 0.92
D.8.2 Importance Factor(I): 1 Residential
D.8.3 Soil Type:
Fundamental Time
D.8.4 0.233 sec
Period(Tx/y):
Response Reduction Factor
D.8.5
(R):
D.8.9 Base Shear from Dynamic Analysis (Response spectrum analysis or time history)
Rx=
Ry=
D.8.1
Damping:
0
D.9 Seismic Analysis Method:
Seimic Coeffecient
D.9.1 Seismic Anlysis method
Method
24.38mm
i. Along X-direction: 6.4 mm
permissible
24.38mm
ii. Along Y-Direction: 6.32 mm
permissible
Page 36
Inter Story Deflection
D.9.7 Eqx Eqy
(Drift):
Storey1 3.31 3.38
Storey2 3.01 3.02
Separation Between blocks if
D.9.8
any:
Page 37