Calculation sheet «1» (of explanatory note), see file

1114СО1T 625359RR.dwg
 Contents
Sheet
Introduction 2
1 Main data 3
2 Design description 4
3 Norms and materials 6
4 Loads 8
5 Lining 16
6 Stringers 19
7 Gantry 22
8 Total stresses in the lining 31
9 Operations with the gate 33
10 Unit of coupling with hydraulic cylinder 37
11 Connection of the leg with the support movable part 39
12 Welding joints 41
13 Pick-up unit 43
Bibliography 45

Introduction
The present calculation is performed on the ground of assignment letter NARIME
№ 0110/NCCK – TMT dated 14.11.2011 and the Contract № 02/12 dated 02.02.2012 with NARIME
625359RR

institute.

Rotary gate 4,0 – 5,6 – 74,0 is installed on the bottom water outlet of HPP Lai Chau in
Social Republic of Vietnam and purposed for maintaining of water level in the water basin and
1114СО1Т

leaking of flood discharges to the downstream.

Sheet
Shee
t

2
 1 Main data

Opening bottom
Clear span, Lp, m 2,32
Load span, Lн, m 4,0
Clear opening height, h0, m 5,6
Loaded height, hн, m 5,992
Designed head, N, m 74,0
Arrangement height of supporting hinge, hh 8,56
Main load on the gate, Q, MN 21,68
Lining radius, R, m 9,6
Calculated lifting force, Q1, MN 1,6
Calculated holding force, Q2, MN 0,88
Distance between suspension points, DSP, m using single point
Load capacity of service mechanism, Qm, t 200
Operations with the gate under a head
Gate mass, G, t 94,4
including the ballast, B, t 40,34
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

3
 2 Design description

The main rotary gate 4,0 – 5,6 – 74,0.

The gate has welded design. Span structure consists of two crossbars with compound I-
shaped cross-section, the stringers, the supporting girders, the diagrams, the lining, upper and bottom
bindings.
The lining is arranged at the pressure side and supported by means of the stringers. Internal
radius of the lining is R = 9,6 m. The lining centre of curvature coincides with rotation axis of the
gate.
The gate legs are straight, double-branched, having a compound I-shaped cross-section, and
welded to the crossbar bands of the span structure. Leg stiffness is ensured by angle braces made as
welded I-shaped section. The legs are coupled with movable parts of hinged supports by means of
bolts.
The gate upper horizontal and vertical sealing is carried out by means of specially-profiled
rubber type VIIа; bottom horizontal sealing made of rubber strips.
Hold-down bars and stainless steel bolts are employed to fasten the sealing to the gate.
The gate lateral motions in the span are limited by means of end wheels on the stainless
steel spindles.
The wheel bushes are made of bronze, with in-pressed inert lubricant (manufactured by “Inn
Log”, Germany).
To disconnect the gate from the hydraulic cylinder rod, the gate is to be preliminary
installed on the stationary pulled-out pickup.
Operations with the gate should be performed under a head, using hydraulic drive with load
capacity 200 t, by means of single point.
625359RR

To ensure gate lowering on the threshold under its own weight, steel cast ballast is
employed and fastened to the gate metal structure with the help of studs.
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

4
 Figure 1– Gate design (see file 625198RR_05.dwg)
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

5
 3 Norms and materials
Calculation of the hinged support metal structure is carried out in accordance with STP
00117794-2-11-95, Mechanical equipment and special steel structures of hydraulic facilities. Design
fundamentals. [B.1]

The following materials are employed in the gate design (manufactured in China):
– metal structures – steel Q345B GOST 1591-94;
– axle of suspension assembly  steel 2Cr13 GB 1220-92 Forged piece Gr. V КП441
GOST 8479-70;

– sealings:
– lateral and upper horizontal – specially-profiled rubber (type VIIa);
– featheredge seal  rubber gasket;
– seals fastening  steel 2Cr13 GB 1220-92;
– embedded parts  steel Q235B GB 700-88;
– welding joints  welding wire ER70S-6 AWS A5.18-93.

Materials are accepted in accordance with the letter NARIME № 0712/NCCK-TMT dated
23.04.2012.

Permissible stresses for the main metal are stated in Table 1.

Permissible stresses in the welding joints for thickness above 16 and up to 35 inclusive:

– welding joints with complete fusion:  τ1  =0,8 ∙  σ И  = 0,8 ∙ 163 = 130 MPa,

– welding joints with incomplete fusion:  τ 2  =0,55 ∙  σ И  = 0,55 ∙ 163 = 90 MPa.

625359RR

Permissible stresses in the welding joints for sheet thickness 40 mm:

– welding joints with complete fusion:  τ 3  =0,8 ∙  σ И  = 0,8 ∙ 148 = 118 MPa,
1114СО1Т

– welding joints with incomplete fusion:  τ 4  =0,55 ∙  σ И  = 0,55 ∙ 148 = 81 MPa.

Sheet
Shee
t

6
 Table 1 – Permissible stresses for the main metal

Mechani
Permissible
cal
Sheet Formula stresses,
propertie
Type of stress Steel grade thickness or MPa
s
diameter, mm

σт,MPa

Normal bending stresses [σи] = 0,5 ∙ σт 163

Tangential bending stresses [τ] = 0,57 ∙ [σи] 93

Total and corrected stresses above 16 [σпр] = 0,75  σт 244

in the lining boards 325
up to 35 incl.
Lug tension considering
[σр] = 0,8  σт 260
factor α
Bearing stress in the patch
Q345B [σсм] = 0,67  σт 218
pieces

Normal bending stresses [σи] = 0,5 ∙ σт 148

above 35
295
up to 50
Tangential bending stresses [τ] = 0,57 ∙ [σи] 84

Normal bending stresses [σи] = 0,5 ∙ σт 137

above 50
275
up to 100 incl.
Tangential bending stresses [τ] = 0,57 ∙ [σи] 78

2Cr13
Normal bending stresses
GB1220-92 [σи] = 0,5 ∙ σт 220
in the suspension axis
Forged piece
above 200 up
Gr. V 441
to 500 incl.
625359RR

Tangential bending stresses КП441

GOST [τ] = 0,57 ∙ [σи] 126
in the suspension axis
8479-70
The special load combination
1114СО1Т

Normal stresses above 16 [σи]ос = 0,9 ∙ σт 293

Q345B 325
Tangential stresses up to 35 incl. [τ] = 0,57 ∙ [σи]ос 167

Sheet
Shee
t

7
 4 Loads

Load combinations acting on the gate.

The main load combination:
- hydrostatic load;
- traction force.
The special load combination:
- hydrostatic load;
- seismic load.

α = 39,6°
Hn = 68008

R = 9600

Hv = 68,008 m

hh = 8560
v
hH = 5992

HH = 74 m 4346
3935

Figure 1 – Circuitry of hydrostatic pressure acting on the gate

625359RR

4.1 The gate geometric characteristics:

hh  hH 8560  5992
1  arcsin  arcsin  arcsin 0,2875  15,515556 ;
R 9600
1114СО1Т

21 = 2  15,515556 = 31,031112;

sin21 = sin 31,031112 = 0,515503;
sin1 = sin 15,515556 = 0,267499;
cos1 = cos 15,515556 = 0,963558;
hh 8560
2  arcsin  arcsin  63,083432 ;
R 9600

Sheet
Shee
t

8
 22 = 2  63,083432 = 126,166864;
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

9
 sin22 = sin 126,166864 = 0,807302;
cos2 = cos 63,083432 = 0,452693;
 = 2 - 1 = 63,083432 - 15,515556 = 47,567876.

4.2 The main load combination

4.2.1 Hydrostatic load on the gate

Horizontal component of hydrostatic load:

HH  Hv 74  68,008
Pg   h H  LH     5,992  4,0 1,0  1701,82 тс = 16,695 MN,
2 2
 = 1 т/м3 = 9,81 kN/m3 – water density.
Vertical component of hydrostatic load:
1  1 H 
Pv   R 2  L H      2 sin 1  cos 2   sin 21  sin 22   2 n   cos 1  cos 2   
2 180 2 R 
1    47,567876 1
  9,6 2  4,0  1,0    2  sin15,515556  cos 63,083432  (sin 2  15,515556 
2  180 2

68,008 
 sin 2  63,083432)  2    cos15,515556  cos 63,083432   
9,6 

= 184,32  [0,830216 + 0,242189 – 0,661403 + 7,238] = 1409,9 ts = 13,831 MN,

where R = 9,6 m – lining radius.

Resultant hydrostatic load on the gate:

Q Pg2  Pv2  16,6952  13,8312  21,68 MN.

Inclination of resultant to the plane:

625359RR

Pv 13,831
  arctg  arctg  arctg 0,828452  39,6 .
Pg 16,695

Arc length from threshold mark to point of application of the resultant:

1114СО1Т


Q  R   2     9600   63,083432  39,6  9600  1,101014  0,691150  3935 mm.

Layout of the crossbars and the stringers is shown in Figure 3.

Sheet
Shee
t

10
 4.2.2 Traction force on the gate is determined on the sheet 35.

R = 9600

по R = 9600

Figure 1 – Layout of the crossbars and the stringers

Load, ts/m2:

PH = 74
PC1 = 73,632
PC2 = 73,332
PP1 = 73,019
625359RR

PC3 = 72,685
PC4 = 72,33
PC5 = 71,954
PC6 = 71,559
1114СО1Т

PC7 = 71,146
PC8 = 70,715
PC9 = 70,269
PP2= 69,808
PC10 = 69,174
PC11 = 68,520
Sheet
Shee
t

11
 PV = 68,008
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

12
 4.3 Seismic load (the special combination)
Horizontal component of seismic load id determined according to formula:
Sikj = k1k2QkAikikj, [B.3, sheet 5]
where k1 = 0,25 – factor taking into account permitted damage of structures and buildings
[B.3, sheet 7]
k2 = 1 – factor taking into account the structural solutions as for structures and buildings;
[B.3, sheet 21]
A = 0,4  1,2 = – seismic factor with consideration of gain by 20% for structures of
0,48 category I; [B.3, sheet 22]
i = – dynamic factor; [B.3, sheet 6]
3,0
k = 0,8 – factor dependent upon type of structures and seismicity degree; (seismicity 9
points); [B.3, sheet 22]
ikj = 1,0 – factor dependent upon type of structure deformation at its own
vibrations; [B.3, sheet 22]
Qk – weight of structure element taking into account added mass of water
Qk = G + Mв g,
wher G – weight of gate (with ballast)
G = Gz + Gp.o + B = 0,53 + 1,109 + 0,396 = 1,035 MN = 1035 kN = 105,5 t
Gz = Gp.s + Gn = 0,343 + 0,186 = 0,53 MN (54 t);
Gp.s = 35 t = 0,343 MN – mass of span structure;
Gn = 19 t = 0,186 MN – mass of legs;
Gp.o = 11,1 t = 0,109 MN – mass of movable parts of the supports,
B = 40,34 t = 0,396 MN – ballast.
mв – horizontal added mass of water per area unit
mвi =   h    
where  9,81 кН  с 2
=   1 - water density;
625359RR

g 9,81 м4
g = 9,81 m/s2 – free fall acceleration;
h = 106 m – water depth adjacent to structure;
 = 0,7 – dimensionless coefficient of added mass of water
at z/h = 74/106 = 0,7 [B.3, sheet 26]
1114СО1Т

z = 74 m Head at the threshold;

 – dimensionless coefficient with consideration of basin length limit and assigned
for /h  3 равным 1;
L0 = 4 m – clear span

Sheet
Shee
t

13
 Figure 2 – Immersion depth of stringers and crossbars (see file 625198RR_12.dwg)
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

14
 Added mass of water and factor i for relevant ordinates z:
zH 74
1) z H = 74 m;   0,698;  = 0,7;
h 106
m вH  1,0  106  0,7  1,0 = 74,2 kN  с2/m3;

z C1 73,632
2) z C1 = 73,632 m;   0,695;  = 0,697;
h 106
m вC1  1,0  106  0,697  1,0 = 73,88 kN  с2/m3;

z C 2 73,332
3) z C 2 = 73,332 m;   0,692;  = 0,696;
h 106
m вC 2  1,0  106  0,696  1,0 = 73,776 kN  с2/m3;

z P1 73,019
4) z P1 = 73,019 m;   0,689;  = 0,695;
h 106
m вP1  1,0  106  0,695  1,0 = 73,67 kN  с2/m3;

z C 3 72,685
5) z C 3 = 72,685 m;   0,686;  = 0,694;
h 106
m вC 3  1,0  106  0,694  1,0 = 73,56 kN  с2/m3;

z C 4 72,33
6) z C 4 = 72,33 m;   0,68;  = 0,692;
h 106
m вC 4  1,0  106  0,692  1,0 = 73,352 kN  с2/m3;

z C5 71,954
7) z C 5 = 71,954 m;   0,679;  = 0,6916;
h 106
m вC 5  1,0  106  0,6916  1,0 = 73,3 kN  с2/m3;

z C 6 71,559
8) z C 6 = 71,559 m;   0,675;  = 0,69;
h 106
m вC 6  1,0  106  0,69  1,0 = 73,14 kN  с2/m3;
625359RR

z C 7 71,146
9) z C 7 = 71,146 m;   0,67;  = 0,688;
h 106
m вC 7  1,0  106  0,688  1,0 = 72,928 kN  с2/m3;
1114СО1Т

z C8 70,715
10) z C8 = 70,715 m;   0,667;  = 0,687;
h 106
m вC8  1,0  106  0,687  1,0 = 72,82 kN  с2/m3;

z C9 70,269
11) z C 9 = 70,269 m;   0,66;  = 0,684;
h 106
m вC 9  1,0  106  0,684  1,0 = 72,504 kN  с2/m3;

Sheet
Shee
t

15
 z P 2 69,808
12) z P 2 = 69,808 m;   0,659;  = 0,6836;
h 106
m вP 2  1,0  106  0,6836  1,0 = 72,46 kN  с2/m3;

z C10 69,174
13) z C10 = 69,174 m;   0,653;  = 0,681;
h 106
m вC10  1,0  106  0,681  1,0 = 72,186 kN  с2/m3;

z C11 68,520
14) z C11 = 68,521 m;   0,646;  = 0,678;
h 106
m вC11  1,0  106  0,678  1,0 = 71,868 kN  с2/m3;

z V 68,008
15) z V = 68,008 m;   0,642;  = 0,677;
h 106
m V  1,0  106  0,677  1,0 = 71,762 kN  с2/m3.

C11

C10
P2
C9
C8
C7
C6
C5
C4
C3
P1
C2
C1
PH

Figure 3 – Curve of added mass of water

Curve area:
625359RR

m вн  m вC1 74,2  73,88

н    z н  z C1     74  73,632  27,25 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC1  m вC 2 73,88  73,776
2    z C1  z C 2     73,632  73,332   22,15 kNс2/m2;
2 2
1114СО1Т

m вC 2  m вP1 73,776  73,67

3    z C 2  z P1     73,332  73,019  23,08 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вP1  m вC 3 73,67  73,56
4    z P1  z C3     73,019  72,685  24,6 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC 3  m вC 4 73,56  73,458
5    z C3  z C 4     72,685  72,33  26,1 kNс2/m2;
2 2

Sheet
Shee
t

16
 m вC 4  m вC 5 73,352  73,3
6    z C 4  z C5     72,33  71,954  27,66 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC5  m вC 6 73,3  73,14
7    z C5  z C6     71,954  71,559   28,92 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC 6  m вC 7 73,14  72,928
8    z C6  z C7     71,559  71,146  30,16 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC7  m вC8 72,928  72,82
9    z C 7  z C8     71,146  70,715  31,4 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC8  m вC9 72,82  72,504
10    z C8  z C 9     70,715  70,269  32,41 kNс2/m2;
2 2
m вC8  m вP 2 72,504  72,46
11    z C9  z P 2     70,269  69,808  33,4 kNс2/m2.
2 2
m вP 2  m C10 72,46  72,186
12    z P 2  z C10     69,808  69,174  45,85 kNс2/m2.
2 2
m вC10  m C11 72,186  71,868
13    z10  z C11     69,174  68,52  47,1 kNс2/m2.
2 2
m C11  m v 71,868  71,762
14    z C11  z V     68,52  68,008  36,84 kNс2/m2.
2 2
I = 27,25 + 22,15 + 23,08 + 24,6 + 26,1 + 27,66 + 28,92 + 30,16 + 31,4 + 32,41 + 33,4 +
+ 45,85 + 47,1 + 36,84 = 436,92 kN  с2/m2.
Added mass of water acting on total area of the gate:
Мв = I  L0 = 436,92  4 = 1748 kN  с2/m.
Curve of added water mass is shown in Figure 5.
Qk = 1035 + 1748  9,81 = 18183 kN.
Sikj = 0,25  1,0  18183  0,48  3,0  0,8  1,0 = 5237 kN = 5,137 MN.
Ration of loads (stresses) on the gate at the main and the special load combinations:
Q  Sikj 21,68  5,137
625359RR

kн =   1,24 ;
Q 21,68

Magnification factor of permissible stresses at the special load combination as referred to

permissible stresses at the main load combination for normal bending stresses in basic metal:
 σ u  ос
1114СО1Т

293
ku    1,7 ,
 σ u  осн 163

where [σu]осн = [σи] = 163.

Since the magnification factor of permissible stresses at special load combination as referred
to permissible stresses at the main load combination (ku) exceeds the ratio of loads on the gate at the

Sheet
Shee
t

17
 special and the main load combinations kH, calculation of the gate is to be performed for the main
combination of loads.
5 Lining

Span axis

Нv = 68,008 m
НС11 = 68,520 m С11

700 700
НС10 = 69,174 m С10

8х525 = 4200
НР2 = 69,808 m Р2
П2
НС9 = 70,269 m С9
НС8 = 70,715 m С8
НС7 = 71,146 m С7

8406
НС6 = 71,559 м С6
НС5 = 71,954 m С5
НС4 = 72,33 m С4
НС3 = 72,685 m С3
НР1 = 73,019 m Р1 525
НС2 = 73,332 m П1 δ = 25 С2 540
НС1 = 73,632 m С1 540
Нн = 74 m

515 650 835 835 650 515

Lo = Lн = 4000

Figure 4 – Lining diagram and hydrostatic load on the crossbars and the stringers
625359RR

5.1 Stress in the lining boards

Stresses in the lining boards are determined according to formula:
2
 b 
  6  Pi         , [B.4, sheet 2]
 10   
1114СО1Т

where Pi – calculated load in the board center;

a
α – dimensionless factor dependent upon ratio of the board sides ;
b
[B.4, sheet 3]
a – large side of the board;

b – smaller side of the board;

Sheet
Shee
t

18
 δ – board thickness.

Figure 5 – Calculation diagram of board П1

5.2 Bopard П1
Board П1 is calculated as the plate with four sides restrained by means of the edges.
Average hydrostatic load on the board П1:
H C 2  H P1 73,332  73,019
H П1   = 73,176 tf/m2 = 0,7179 MPa.
2 2
а = 835 mm; b = 540 mm;  = 25 mm.
Sides’ ratio:
a 835
 = 1,55;
b 540
 = 25 mm = 0,025 mm – lining thickness.
Factors for determination of stresses at the sides’ ratio:
 ab  7,685;  ba  5,695;  cb  3,745;  ca  1,985 [B.4, Table
B.1]
625359RR

154 MPa <  σ и  ;

 0,54 
σ ab  6  0,7179  7,685    
 10  0,025 
2

114 MPa <  σ и  ;

 0,54 
σ ba  6  0,7179  5,695    
 10  0,025 
1114СО1Т

75 MPa <  σ и  ;
 0,54 
σ cb  6  0,7179  3,745    
 10  0,025 
2

40 MPa <  σ и  ;
 0,54 
σ ca  6  0,7179  1,985    
 10  0,025 

σ aa  μ  σ ab  0,3  154 = 46 MPa <  σ и  ;

Sheet
Shee
t

19
 σ bb  μ  σ ba  0,3  114 = 34 MPa <  σ и  ;

where μ  0,3 - Poisson’s ratio for steel [B.4, sheet 2]

5.3 Board П2

Figure 6 – Calculation diagram of board П2

Board П2 is calculated as the plate with four sides restrained by means of the edges.
Average hydrostatic load on the board П П2:
H C 9  H P 2 70,269  69,808
H П1   = 70,034 tf/m2 = 0,687 MPa.
2 2
а = 835 mm; b = 525 mm;  = 25 mm.
Sides’ ratio:
a 835
 = 1,59;
b 525
 = 25 mm = 0,025 m – lining thickness.
Factors for determination of stresses at the sides’ ratio:
 ab  7,809;  ba  5,707;  cb  3,797;  ca  1,94 [B.4, Table
625359RR

B.1]
2

142 MPa <  σ и  ;

 0,525 
σ ab  6  0,687  7,809    
 10  0,025 
2

104 MPa <  σ и  ;

 0,525 
σ ba  6  0,687  5,707    
1114СО1Т

 10  0,025 
2

69 MPa <  σ и  ;
 0,525 
σ cb  6  0,687  3,797    
 10  0,025 
2

35 MPa <  σ и  ;
 0,525 
σ ca  6  0,687 1,94    
 10  0,025 

σ aa  μ  σ ab  0,3  142 = 43 MPa <  σ и  ;

Sheet
Shee
t

20
 σ bb  μ  σ ba  0,3  104 = 31 MPa <  σ и  ;

6 Stringers
6.1 Load on the stringers
Linear hydrostatic loads on the stringers are determined according to formula:
qCi = Pi  bi,
where Pi – hydrostatic load on the stringer;
bi – width of load area transferring the load to the stringer.

Table 2 – Linear hydrostatic loads on the stringers

Stringer № Pi, tf/m2 Pi, MN/m2 bi, m qCi, MN/m

0,54  0,54
С2 73,332 0,72  0,54 0,39
2

0,525  0,525
С3 72,685 0,713  0,525 0,374
2

Stringer C2 is calculated as the most stressed one.

6.2 Geometric characteristics of the stringer

Table 3 – Geometric characteristics of stringer С2

Stringer № Cross-section Value

A = 103,54 cm2

Y = 127,5 97,5 Y = 12,75 cm

625359RR

Iy = 7714 cm4

Wymax = 791 cm3

54

Stringer С2 y 200х200х20
106

Wymin = 605 cm3

1114СО1Т

y
Sps. y = 409,75 cm3
52

Sо = 305cm3
25 200

Sheet
Shee
t

21
 Diagram of bending moments [kN*m]

Diagram of transverse (cross) forces [kN]

625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

22
 Figure 7 – Calculation diagram of stringer С2
6.3 Stresses in the stringers

Normal stresses in the stringer section:

M C2 0,02472
C2   = 41 MPa < [σи],
min
Wy 605  10 6

where МС2 = 24,72 kN∙m = 0,02472 MN∙m (Figure 9).

Tangential stresses of the shearing in stringer:

Q C 2  S ps. y 0,17022  410 10 6

  = 45 MPa  [],
Iy s 7714 10 8  0,02

where QC2 = 170,22 kN = 0,17022 MN (Figure 9).

625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

23
 7 Gantry
Bearing gantry consists of the span structure, the legs, two crossbars and two hinged
supports.
For the purpose of calculation, the gantry is subdivided for two individual U-shaped frames
with hinged legs.
The most loaded U-shaped frame is affected by stress due hydrostatic load.
Load per single frame:
Q 21,68
P  = 10,84 MN,
2 2
where Q = 21,68 MN – hydrostatic load on the gate (sheet 9).

7.1.1 Geometric characteristics

Table 4 – Геометрические характеристики ригелей Р1, Р2

Cross-section Value
Crossbar Р1, crossbar Р2 (in the span)

Ar = 750 cm2;
25 1300
Ix = 2113427 cm4;

d = 30 Wxmin = 26888 cm3;

418

x
500 Wxmax = 33814 cm3;
1
2 Sps.x = 18201 cm3;
418

x S1 = 12801 cm3,
30
625 786 S2 = 10770 cm3.

1411
Crossbar Р2 (on the support)
625359RR

Ar = 945 cm2;
25 1300
Ix = 2393859 cm4;

d = 45 Wxmin = 30890 cm3;

1114СО1Т

418

x
500 Wxmax = 37639 cm3;
1
2 Sps.x = 21430 cm3;
418

x S1 = 13031 cm3,
30
636 775 S2 = 10605 cm3.

1411

Sheet
Shee
t

24
 1114СО1Т 625359RR

25
t
Shee
Sheet
 Table 5 – Geometric characteristics of the leg branch of U-shaped frame

Cross-section Value

An = 438 cm2;
420
Ixn = 325946 cm4;

30
270 y
Iy = 41036 cm4;
Wx = 9587 cm3;
680

Wy = 1520 cm3;
x x 620
I xn 325946
rx   = 27,3 cm;
30 An 438
Iy 41036
ry   = 9,7 cm.
An 438
30

7.2 Determination of forces in the gantry frame

Geometric dimensions and load as referred to the gantry are shown in Figure 10.
Stiffness distribution ratio:
Ix h 2113427 900
k     25,2,
I xn L p 325946 232

where Iх = 2113427 cm4 – inertia moment of the crossbar section in the span (sheet 22);
Ixn = 325946 cm4 – inertia moment of the section of leg branch;
h = 9000 mm = 900 cm – calculated length of the leg branch;
Lp = 2320 mm = 232 cm – calculated span.
625359RR

Distributed load on the crossbar:

P 10,84
q   2,71 MN/m,
Lo 4

where Р = 10,84 MN – load per single frame (sheet 22).

1114СО1Т

Concentrated load Pc due to uniform load on the cantilever beam:

Pc  q  c  2,71  0,84  2,276 MN.

Bending moment in the cantilever beam:

Pc  c 2,276  0,84
Mc     0,956 MN∙m.
2 2

Sheet
Shee
t

26
 Vertical support reaction:
P 10,84
N   5,42 MN.
2 2
Thrust value:
q  L2p 3 q  c2 2,71 2,32 2 3  2,71 0,84 2
H     0,00162 MN.
4  h   2  k  3 2  h   2  k  3 4  9   2  25,2  3 2  9   2  25,2  3

Bending moment acting on the leg:

M n   H  h  0,00162  9 = – 0,01458 MNm.

Bending moment on the support:

М = Мс + Мn = – 0,956 + (– 0,01458) = – 0,971 MNm.
Maximum bending moment in the span:
q  L2p 2,71  2,32 2
M max  M  (0,971)  0,852 MNm.
8 8
Normal bending stresses of the crossbar in the span:
M max Sp 0,852 0,00162
q    6
  32 MPa,
Wxmin
A r 26888 10 750 10 4

where Sp = H = 0,00162 MN – axial thrust in the crossbar.

Касательные напряжения в ригеле на опоре:

Q  S ps.x
3,144 18201 10 6
q    90 MPa < [],
Ix   2113427 10 8  0,03

where Q = N – Pc = 5,42 – 2,276 = 3,144 MN – shearing force on the force;

 = 30 mm = 0,03 m – thickness of the crossbar walls (Table 4).
625359RR

Normal stresses in the leg branch of rotary gate:

n 
Sn  T / М n
 
5,42  0,9

  0,01458 
4 158 MPa < [и],
  An Wx 0,904  438  10 9587  10 6
1114СО1Т

where Sn = N = 5,42 MN – axial compressive force in the leg branch;

Т' – axial thrust in rotary gate leg due to traction force;
h 900
 = 0,904 at   r  27,3  33 . [B. 6, page 80]
x

Sheet
Shee
t

27
 7.3 Determination of load on upper gantry due to traction force

e = 900
T = 0,729 MN
P1 P2

RP1  = 3850 RP2

Figure 8 – Calculation diagram for determination of load on the gantry

T  (  e) 0,729  (3,85  0,9)

T' = RР2 =  = 0,9 MN,
 3,85
Qm 1,962
where T =  сos  =  сos 42 = 0,981  0,743145 = 0,729 MN – component of
2 2

traction force on the gantry;

Qm = 200 t = 1,962 MN – traction force of hydraulic cylinder (sheet 33);
 = 42 – angle between traction force direction and P2 crossbar axes;
 = 3850 mm = 3,85 m – distance between crossbars Р1 and Р2 (Figure 10);
e = 900 mm = 0,9 m – distance from P2 crossbar to the lug axis.
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

28
 7.3.1 Geometric dimensions of the gantry

h = 9000 mm = 9 m – calculated height of the gantry;

с = 840 mm = 0,84 m – cantilever beam length.

600
1300 25
Lo = 4000

h = 9000
q = 2,71 MN/m
30

R = 9600
8270

c = 840 Lp = 2320 c=
625359RR

840
Figure 9 – Geometric dimensions and load on the gantry
1114СО1Т

H H

N N

Sheet
Shee
t

29
 Lo = 4000
q = 2,71 MN/m

Mc Mc = – 0,956 MNm
М М = – 0,971 MNm

Мn Мn = – 0,01458 MNm

М = 0,8527

MNm

Gate rotation axis

H H
625359RR

N N

c = 840 Lp = 2320 c = 840

1114СО1Т

Figure 10 – Diagrams of bending moments due to

hydrostatic pressure

Sheet
Shee
t

30
 7.3.2 Gantry and traction force

1 = 940 2 = 440 940 T' = 0,9 MN

МB МС
T'
∙ ∙ ∙
B Е C
C

h = 9000
Lp = 2320

H1 A D H1

N1 N1

Figure 11 – Diagrams of bending moments due to traction force

Thrust resulted from traction force:
3 T   1  2 3 0,9  0,94  0,44
Н1 = 2    2  = 0,001 MN.
2 h  L p  (2  k  3) 2 9  2,32  (2  25,2  3)

Bending moments in the points В and С:

МВ = МС = Н1 ∙ h = 0,001 ∙ 9 = 0,009 MN∙m.
Bending moment in the point Е:
625359RR

МЕ = Н1 ∙ h – Т' ∙ 1 = 0,00098 ∙ 9 – 0,9 ∙ 0,94 = – 0,84 MN∙m.

Normal bending stresses of the crossbar in the span due to traction force:
M E H1 0,84 0,001
T    6
  – 31 MPa.
min
A r 26888 10 750 10 4
1114СО1Т

Wx
Tangential stresses in the crossbar on the support due to traction force:
T   Sps.x
0,9 1820110 6
T    26 MPa < [].
Ix   2113427 10 8  0,03
Total normal stresses in the crossbar at the span:
σ = σq + σT = 32 + 31 = 63 MPa < [σи].
Total tangential stresses in the crossbar on the support:
Sheet
Shee
t

31
 τ = τq + τT = 90 + 26 = 116 MPa > [].
Since total tangential stresses in the crossbar P2, affected by traction force, exceed the
permissible stresses, thickness of the crossbar wall should be increased up to 45 мм.
Tangential stresses in the crossbar Р2 on the support:
Q  Sps.x 3,144  21430  10 6
q    63 MPa < [],
Ix   2393859  10 8  0,045

where Q = 3,144 MN – shearing force on the support (sheet 23);

 = 45 mm = 0,045 m – thickness of crossbar wall (Table 5).
Tangential stresses in the crossbar Р2 on the support due to traction force:
T  Sps. x
0,9  21430  10 6
T    18 MPa < [].
Ix   2393859  10 8  0,045
Total tangential stresses in the crossbar Р2 on the support:
τ = τq + τT = 63 + 18 = 81 MPa < [].

7.4 Verification of branch stability

7.4.1 Condition of leg branch stability:
N
 [ i ] ,
e  A

where N = Sn  T = 5,42 + 0,9 = 6,32 MN – axial compressive force in the leg branch;
е = 0,895 – longitudinal bending ratio; [B.6, Table 74]
Аn = F = 438 cm2 – area of the leg calculation section (sheet 23).
R yп 325
Ry    309 MPa – calculated resistance of steel Q345B;
m 1,05

Ryп = [σт] = 325 MPa – steel yield point.

625359RR

Specific elasticity:
Ry 309
    33  = 1,28 [B.6, Table 74]
E 2,06 10 5

  n 1,0  900
1114СО1Т

where    = 33 – branch elasticity; [B.4, page 21]

i 27,3

 = 1,0 – length correction factor; [B.6, page 79]

n = h = 900 cm – leg calculated length (sheet 23);
i = rх = 27,3 cm – inertia radius of section (sheet 23).
Corrected relative eccentricity:
m ef    m = 2,1  0,0105 = 0,022, [B.6, page 15]
Sheet
Shee
t

32
 where η – section influence coefficient; [B.6, Table 73]
m – relative eccentricity:
e  A 0,23  438
m  = 0,0105, [B.6, page 15],
Wx 9587

е – eccentricity
M n 0,01458
e  = 0,0023 m = 0,23 cm, [B. 6, page 16]
N 6,32
where Мn = 0,01458 MN·m (sheet 24).
Influence coefficient of section shape:
  1,75  0,1  m   0,02   5  m     (1,75 – 0,1  0,0105) – 0,02 · (5 – 0,0105)  1,28 = 2,1.
[B.6, табB.73]
Condition of leg branch stability:
6,32
< 163;
0,895  438 10 4

161 MPa < 163 MPa.

Condition of stability is implemented.
7.4.2 Verification of branch stability in the plane of couplings:
N
 [ i ] .
A

Branch elasticity:
  y 1,0  237,5
   24,
i 9,7
where  = 1,0 – calculated length factor; [B.6, page 79]
у = 237,5 cm – distance between coupling units;
i = ry = 9,7 см – inertia radius of section (sheet 23).
625359RR

Specific elasticity:

Ry 309
    24  = 0,93,
E 2,06  10 5

 Ry   309 
1114СО1Т

  1   0,073  5,53        1   0,073  5,53    0,93  0,93  0,94.

 E   2,06 105 

[B.6, page 9]
Condition of stability:
6,32
 163 ;
0,94  438  10 4

154 MPa < 163 MPa.

Sheet
Shee
t

33
 Condition of stability is implemented.
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

34
 8 Total stresses in the lining

Crossbar Р1, board П1

In point А (loaded side):
х = – + аа = – 32 + 46 = 14 MPa < [пр],
where q = 32 MPa (sheet 24);
аа = 46 MPa (sheet 17).
у = + аb; у = 154 MPa < [и]
Corrected stresses: пр   2х   2у   х   у   ,

σпр = 14 2  154 2  14  154 = 147 MPa < [σпр].

In point А (stress-free side):
х = – q –  aa = –32 – 46 = – 78 MPa < [пр],
у = – аb; у = – 154 MPa < [и]
σпр = (78) 2  (154) 2  (78)  ( 154 ) = 133 MPa < [σпр].
In point B (loaded side):
х = – q + bа = – 32 + 114 = 82 MPa < [пр],
where bа = 114 MPa (sheet 17).
у = bb; у = 34 MPa < [и]
 пр  82 2  34 2  82  34  71 MPa < [пр].
In point B (stress-free side):
х = – q – bа = – 32 – 114 = – 146 MPa < [пр].
у = – bb; у = – 34 MPa < [и]
625359RR

 пр  ( 146) 2  ( 34) 2  (146)  ( 34)  132 MPa < [пр].

Summation of stresses due to general bending in the connected band of the main girder and
in the connected band of the stringer С2:
1114СО1Т

 + С2 = 32 + 41 = 73 MPa < [пр],

where С2 = 41 MPa (sheet 21).

Sheet
Shee
t

35
 Crossbar Р2, board П2
In point A (loaded side):
х = –  + аа = – 63 + 43 = – 20 MPa < [пр],
where  = 63 MPa (sheet 28);
аа = 43 MPa (sheet 18).
у = + аb; у = 142 MPa < [и]
Corrected stresses: пр   2х   2у   х   у   ,

σпр = ( 20) 2  142 2  ( 20) 142 = 152 MPa < [σпр].

In point A (stress-free side):
х = –  –  aa = –63 – 43 = – 106 MPa < [пр],
у = – аb; у = – 142 MPa < [и]
σпр = ( 106) 2  ( 142) 2  ( 106)  ( 142 ) = 128 MPa < [σпр].
In point B (loaded side):
х = –  + bа = – 63 + 104 = 41 MPa < [пр],
where bа = 104 MPa (sheet 18).
у = bb; у = 31 MPa < [и]
 пр  412  312  41  31  37 MPa < [пр].
In point B (stress-free side):
х = –  – bа = –63– 104 = – 167 MPa < [пр].
у = – bb; у = – 31 MPa < [и]
 пр  ( 167) 2  (31) 2  ( 167)  (31)  154 MPa < [пр].
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

36
 9 Operations with the gate

Т
Мmax

Rv = 9275
Qm gp.o = 500
Gp.o

Ту Bv bv = 8440

Gp.s Gn gn = 4300

Q gp.s = 6900

8350 Bn
bn = 6300

Ф
625359RR

Figure 12 – Scheme for the gate check for lowering

9.1 Check for lowering

The gate is checked for lowering acc. to formula:
1114СО1Т

0,02  Qm  q + Ф  t1 + n T  (M T  Tg  t  Tv  R v )  n G  (G p.s  g p.s  G n  g n  G p.o  g p.o  B v  b v  B n  b n ) ,

max

[B. 1, sheet 60]

where Qm = 200 t = 1,962 MN – load capacity of service mechanism (hydraulic cylinder traction
force);
Ф =   H  b1  LH = 1,0  74  0,03  4 = 8,88 тс = 0,087 MN – seepage pressure;

Sheet
Shee
t

37
 b1 = 0,03 м – width of sealing contour along the threshold;
t, t1, gn, gp.s, gp.о,.q, bv, bn, Rv – arms of relative forces;
n T  1,2 – safety factor as for loading; [B.1, sheet 6]
M Tmax – moment due to friction force in supporting and running gears (hinges);
D max D
M Tmax  Q   f1  H   s  f 2max ,
2 2
Q = 21,68 MN (sheet 9);
D = 490 mm = 0,49 m – diameter of the bearing sphere;
Ds = 580 mm = 0,58 m – mean diameter of thrust collar;
H∑ – total thrust
H∑ = 2  H + H1 = 0,00324 + 0,001 = 0,00424 MN;
H = 0,00162 MN (sheet 24);
H1 = 0,001 MN (sheet 28);
f1max = 0,15 – maximum friction factor of sliding in the bearing (FAG);

f 2max = 0,15 – maximum friction factor of sliding in the thrust end washer;
D D 0,49 0,58
M Tmax  Q   f1max  H   s  f 2max = 21,68   0,15  0,00424   0,15 = 0,797 MNm.
2 2 2 2

Тg,. Tv – friction force in horizontal and vertical gaskets (seals):

max
Тg = Pg  f y = 0,0628  0,9 = 0,0565 MN,
max
Tv = Pv  f y = 0,2622  0,9 = 0,236 MN,
Pg,. Pv – bearing pressure of horizontal and vertical gaskets (seals):
Pg = q1  LH = 0,0157  4 = 0,0628 MN,
Pv = q1  v  2 = 0,0157  8,35  2 = 0,2622 MN,
q1 = 1,6 tF/m = 0,0157 MN/m – linear bearing pressure;
625359RR

v = 8,35 m – loaded length of lateral sealing;

f ymax = 0,9 – rubber friction factor on steel (maximum); [B.1, sheet 76]
1114СО1Т

Gp.s = 35 t = 0,343 MN (sheet 11);

Gn = 19 t = 0,186 MN (sheet 11);

Gp.o = 11,1 t = 0,109 MN (sheet 11).

Вv = 8,84 t = 0,087 MN – weight of upper ballast;

Вn = 31,5 t = 0,309 MN – weight of bottom ballast.

Sheet
Shee
t

38
 0,02  1,962  6,7 + 0,087  4,38 + 1,2  (0,797 + 0,0565  9,742 + 0,236  9,275) 
 0,9  (0,343  6,9 + 0,186  4,3 + 0,109  0,5 + 0,087  8,44 + 0,309  6,3);
0,2629 + 0,381 + 4,242  0,9  (2,3667 + 0,8 + 0,055 + 0,73 + 1,95);
4,886 MN  5,31 MN.

9.2 Check of the gate s for lifting

Lifting force is determined according to formula:
n G  (G p.s  g p.s  G n  g n  G p.o  g p.o  B v  b v  B n  b n )  n T  (M Tmax  Tg  t  Tv  R v )  n p  M p  Q1  q ,
[B.1, sheet 60]
where n G = 1,1 – safety factor as for loading; [B.1, sheet 5]
n p  1,0 – safety factor as for loading; [B.1, sheet 5]
Mp – force moment of suction effect
Mp = Pp  t1 = 0,012  4,346 = 0,052 MNm,
Pp – force of suction effect
Pp = p  b  LH = 60  10-3  0,05  4 = 0,012 MN;
p = 60 kN/m2 – intensity of suction effect;
Q1 – lifting capacity.

1,1  (0,343  6,9 + 0,186  4,3 + 0,109  0,5 + 0,087  8,44 + 0,309  6,3) +
+ 1,2  (0,797 + 0,0565  9,742 + 0,236  9,275) + 1,0  0,052  Q1  6,7;
6,49 + 4,24 + 0,052  Q1  6,7;
10,782  Q1  6,7;
10,782
625359RR

Q1 = 6,7
;
Q1 = 1,6 MN (163 t).

Load capacity assigned for service mechanism is Qm = 200 t.

1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

39
 9.3 The gate retention (holding) at lowering
Value of retention force is determined according to formula:

n G  (G p.s  g p.s  G n  g n  G p.o  g p.o  B v  b v  B n  b n )  n T  (M Tmin  Tg  t  Tv  R v )  n p  M p  Q 2  q

[B.1, sheet 61]

where n T = 1,0 – overload factor for friction forces; [B.1, sheet 6]

M Tmin – friction moment in supporting hinge, minimum.

D min D 0,49 0,58
M Tmin  Q   f1  H   s  f 2min = 21,68   0,05  0,00424   0,05 = 0,266 MNm.
2 2 2 2

f1min = 0,05 – minimum friction factor of sliding in the bearing (FAG);

f 2min = 0,05 – minimum friction factor of sliding in the thrust end washer;
n p = 1,0 – safety factor as for load;

Mp = 0;
Т'g,. T'v – friction force in horizontal and vertical gaskets (sealing):
min
Т'g = Pg  f y = 0,0628  0,1 = 0,00628 MN,
min
T'v = Pv  f y = 0,2622  0,1 = 0,02622 MN,
f ymin  0,1 – rubber friction factor on steel, minimum;

Q2 – value of retaining force.

1,1  (0,343  6,9 + 0,186  4,3 + 0,109  0,5 + 0,087  8,44 + 0,309  6,3) –
– 1  (0,266 + 0,00628  9,742 + 0,02622  9,275) + 0 ≤ Q2  6,7;
6,49 – 0,5704 + 0 ≤ Q2  6,7;
5,9 ≤ Q2  6,7;
625359RR

5,9
Q2 = 6,7 ;

Q2 = 0,88 MN (90 t).

1114СО1Т

Load capacity of the service mechanism is sufficient for the gate retention at its lowering.

Sheet
Shee
t

40
 10 Unit of coupling with hydraulic cylinder

Load on suspension piece:

Qm = 200 t = 1,962 MN – load capacity of the service mechanism

s1 = 30

d = 260
s2 = 20 s2 = 20

dn = 500
a = 220
 = 440

Figure 13 – Unit of coupling with hydraulic cylinder

10.1 Axis
Axis material – steel 2 Cr13 GB 1220-92 forged piece Gr. V КП441 GOST 8479-70.
625359RR

g = 165
q

А В
1114СО1Т

RA RВ
а = 220
р = 440

Figure 14 – Calculation diagram of axis

Sheet
Shee
t

41
 Linear load on the axis:
Q m 1,962
q   11,89 MN/m,
g 0,165

where  g = 0,165 m – width of the bearing of hydraulic cylinder lug;

Supporting reactions:
q  g 11,89  0,165
RA  RB   = 0,981 MN.
2 2
Maximum bending moment:

q  g 11,89  0,165
M max   (2  р  g )   ( 2  0,44  0,165)  0,175 MNm.
8 8
Normal stresses:
M max 0,175
σ   100 MPa < [и].
0,1 d 3
0,1  0,263
Tangential stresses:

6,1 R А 6,1 0,981

τ   28 MPa < [].
πd 2
3,14  0,26 2

Bearing stress in the patch pieces:

RA 0,981
σ см    94 MPa < [см].
2  d  s 2  0,26  0,02

10.2 Stresses in the welding joints, connecting the patch pieces with the lug:

P 0,981
 fn    89 MPa < [3],
  d n  0,7  k 3,14  0,5  0,7  0,01
625359RR

where dn = 500 mm = 0,5m – patch piece diameter;

k = 10 мм = 0,01 м – leg of welding joint.
1114СО1Т

Axis diameter is selected according to the lug diameter of hydraulic cylinder rod.

Sheet
Shee
t

42
 11 Connection of the leg with the support movable part

B1 = 1200

b = 620

s=100 310 b = 310

Figure 15 – Diagram of rotary gate leg flange adjoined to

the hinged support

11.1 Section 1
Section 1 acts as the plate supported at four sides.
625359RR

Bending moments are determined for the plate strip with width 1 cm = 0,01 m.
N 6  M h 6  H   3 11,82 6  0,399 6  0,00424  1,47
 сж
max
       6,335 MPa,
L1  B1 B1  L1 L1  B1
2 2
1,74  1,2 1,2  1,74 2 1,74  1,2 2
Q  Q m 21,68  1,962
1114СО1Т

where N =   11,82 MN;

2 2
H∑ = 0,00424 MN (sheet 34)
L1 = 1740 mm = 1,74 m;
B1 = 1200 mm = 1,2 m;
3 = 1470 mm = 1,47 m – distance between the hinged support axis and leg flange of
rotary gate;
Sheet
Shee
t

43
 M Tmax 0,797
MN =   0,399 MN – friction moment in single hinge;
2 2
M Tmax = 0,797 MN (sheet 34).
Maximum bending moment:
M a  1  q  a 2 , B. 7, page 396

where 1 – factor dependent upon the rate of calculated section sides:

b 0,62
  1,2 ; 1 = 0,063; B. 7, page 397
a 0,54
q – load on the plate section:
q   сж
max
 0,01  6,335  0,01  0,06335 MN/m.

a = 0,54 m – short side of the board;

b = 0,62 m – long side of the board.
M а  0,063  0,06335  0,54 2  1,16  10 3 MNm.

Bending stress:
Ma 1,16 10 3
σa    70 MPa < [и],
Wa 1,667 10 5
0,01  s 2 0,01  0,12
where Wa =  = 1,667  10-5 m3,
6 6
s = 100 mm = 0,1 m – plate thickness.

11.2 Section 2 (cantilever beam):

Maximum bending moment:
q  a 12 0,06335  0,26 2
Mk    2,14 10 3 ,
2 2
а1 = 0,26 m – board side.
Bending stress:
625359RR

Mk 2,14  10 3
σk    128 MPa < [и].
W 1,667  10 5
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

44
 12 Welding joints
Stress in the welding joints, connecting the lining and the crossbar wall:
Q  S1 3,144  12801  10 6
τf   = 85 MPa < [2],
I x  2  h h 2113427  10 8  2  0,7  0,016

where Q = 3,144 MN (sheet 24);

S1 = 12801 cm3 (sheet 22);
Ix = 2113427 cm4 (sheet 22);
hh = 16 mm = 0,016 m – leg of welding joint.
Stress in the welding joints, connecting the supporting girder with the wall of crossbar Р1:
1,25  Q 1,25  3,144
τсв    84 MPa < [1],
ст

1,3  ш 1  δ 1,3 1,19  0,03

where Q  N  Pc  5,42  2,276  3,144 MN – load on the crossbar;

N = 5,42 MN (sheet 24);
Рс = 2,276 MN (sheet 23);
ℓш1 = 1300-2∙40-30 = 1190 mm = 1,19 m – length of welding joint taking into account
incomplete fusion;
δ = 30 mm = 0,03 m – thickness of crossbar wall (K – shaped splicing of the edges with
complete fusion).
Stress in the welding joints, connecting the supporting girder with the wall of crossbar Р2:
1,25  Q ''' 1,25  3,594
τ    65 MPa < [3],
ст
св
1,3  ш2  δ 1,3 1,175  0,045

T 0,9
wher Q '''  N   Pc  5,42   2,276  3,594 MN – load on the crossbar Р2;
2 2
N = 5,42 MN (sheet 24);
625359RR

T' = 0,9 MN (sheet 25);

Рс = 2,276 MN (sheet 23);
ℓш2 = 1300 - 2∙40 -45=1175 mm = 1,175 m – length of welding joint taking into account
incomplete fusion;
1114СО1Т

δ = 45 мм = 0,045 м – thickness of crossbar wall (K – shaped splicing of the edges with

complete fusion)..

Stress in the welding joints, connecting the stringer С2 with the lining:
Q C 2  So 0,17022  305  10 6
f    60 MPa < [2],
I y  2  0,7  h h1 7714  10 8  2  0,7  0,008

Sheet
Shee
t

45
 where Q C 2  0,17022 MN (sheet 21);
So = 305 cm3 (sheet 19);
Iy = 7714 cm4 (sheet 19);
hh1 = 8 mm = 0,008 m – leg of welding joint.

Stress in the welding joints, connecting the stringer with the diaphragm:
R max 0,34044
уч 
τсв   74 MPa < [2],
2  ш  0,7  h h2 2  0,41  0,7  0,008

where R max  340,44 kN = 0,34044 MN (sheet 20);

hh2 = 8 mm = 0,008 m – leg of welding joint;
h = hстр + hк = 0, 13 + 0, 28 = 0, 41 m,
where hстр = 200-40-10-20 = 130 mm = 0,013 m – length of welding joint along the
stringer;
hк = 300-20 -20 = 260 mm = 0,026 m – length of welding joint along the gusset.
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

46
 13 Pickup unit

Within calculation, lowering speed of rotary gate for pickup is assigned as not exceeding 0,5
m/min. Herewith, the dynamic factor (Kd) is equal to 1.

Т8

ℓh1 = 820

ℓh = 396

δ'
а = 343

Figure 16 – Diagram of pickup supporting

625359RR

Loading on the pickup:

Gz  B 0,53  0,396
P  n   1,1   0,51 MN.
2 2
1114СО1Т

where n = 1,1 – safety factor; B. 1, sheet 5

Gz = 54 t = 0,53 MN – gate weight (sheet 11);
В = 40,34 t = 0,396 MN – ballast weight (sheet 11).

Bending moment:
M  P  a  0,5  0,343  0,175 MNm,

Sheet
Shee
t

47
 where a = 343 mm = 0,343 m (Figure 18).
Calculated section А –А is shown in Figure 19.

247 193
440
Figure 17 – Calculated section А –А (Figure 18)
Geometric characteristics of the section:
A = 157 cm2;
I y  29384 cm4;

Wy  1190 cm3.
Normal stress:
M 0,175
   147 MPa < [σи],
W 1190  10 6
Stress in welding joint of the support rib welding:
625359RR

P 0,51
τh    82 MPa < [τ2],
2  h  0,7  h h3 2  0,371  0,7  0,012
where 'h = h – d = 396 – 25= 371 mm = 0,371 m – length of welding joint taking into account incomplete fusion;
1114СО1Т

hh3= 12 mm = 0,012 m – leg of welding joint

Stress in welding joint h1:

P 0,51
τ h1    60 MPa < [τ2],
2  h  0,7  h h4 2  0,76  0,7  0,008
where 'h = h1 – 2 ∙ 20 -20= 820 – 40 – 20= 760 mm = 0,76 m – length of welding joint taking into account incomplete
fusion;
Sheet
Shee
t

48
 hh4 = 8 мм = 0,008 m – leg of welding joint.
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

49
 Bibliography

1. STP 00117794-2-11-95. Mechanical equipment and special steel structures of hydraulic

facilities. Design fundamentals.
2. SNiP PI – 7 – 81 Design standards. Construction in seismic areas. “Stroyizdat”, М.
1982.
3. STP 031000-504-88 Welding joints.
4. STP 031000-507-86 Gate lining. Instruction on calculation.
5. G. S. Pisarenko, Handbook - theory of strength of materials. Publishing house
“Naukova Dumka”, K., 1988.
6. SNiP II–23–81 Construction Codes. Steel structures. “Stroyizdat”, М., 1991.
7. K. K. Mukhanov. Metal structures. M., 1978.
625359RR
1114СО1Т

Sheet
Shee
t

50