CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

Master of Education in Special Education

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SPD-590 1/9/2020 4/22/2020

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________

Seven Oak Middle School

COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Oregon
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________

Judy Peters
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________

Nesa Sasser
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 1 TOTAL
POINTS 85.8 points 85.8 %
10.00 1000 858 100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient Distinguished
(Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
80 to 92 93 to 100
The performance of the The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
this disposition and consistently exceeds this
expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
teaching. Candidate during student
teaching.

High Expectations Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. 1.00
These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 85
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
The taught a lesson on fractions. She moves through the lesson cycle smoothly and highlights the major points.

Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of
the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact
with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and 85 1.00
establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
She is respectful and it was evident in all of the interactions that I have had with her.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient Distinguished
(Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
80 to 92 93 to 100
The performance of the The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
this disposition and consistently exceeds this
expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
teaching. Candidate during student
teaching.

Fairness Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise
fairness in all areas including assessment. 85 1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Teacher is perceived to be fair.

Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their
community. 87
Evidence 1.00
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
no concerns here. She dressed professionally and her attitude in class was professional with students.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient Distinguished
(Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
80 to 92 93 to 100
The performance of the The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
this disposition and consistently exceeds this 1.00
expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
teaching. Candidate during student
teaching.

Reflection Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should
be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 87
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Teacher knows where to go to get help. She used exit tickets in order to reflect on next steps with students for the next lesson.

Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
87
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
She asked adequate questions to keep the students engaged.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient Distinguished
(Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
80 to 92 93 to 100
The performance of the The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
this disposition and consistently exceeds this
expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
teaching. Candidate during student
teaching.

Honesty Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
87 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Teacher candidate is honest.

Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others
while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 85
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Teacher candidate has shown compassion and has a demeanor that is friendly and I am sure that the students perceive her as approachable also.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Advocacy Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in
the educational setting. 85 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Lesson-fractions. She passed out paper and the sections had shaded areas; and she was very detailed how the students should fold the paper in order to internalize 1/2 and 1/4 fractions. She
timed students to ensure that they had enough time to complete the assignment. She monitored progress by giving a thumbs up or thumps down. She gave step by step directions. on how to
proceed with the activity. I would check to ensure that all are on bored when hiking for undertaking and use the at a from the check. Meek advised me that she gave an exit ticket at the end of the
lesson and she revisited the lesson to assist with deficiencies based on data from exit ticket.. It was one instance where she asked for feedback from students but hardly any students responded.
She asked students to make predictions. I noticed that some students seemed misunderstand the patterns; she advised how she could taught this difference. For video #2: continue with checking
Dedication
for understanding.
Score No Evidence
Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
85
1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Also for Video #2 ensure that students know what they are learning and why it is important.
You will also need the attendance sheet to submit for evaluate #2. Just complete it for the days so far. It does not have to be totally completed.But I will need a copy of it before I submit.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Alaina Meek 20557145

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.

Total Scored Percentage:

85.8 %
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:
(Optional)

Attachment 2:
(Optional)

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty
Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.

I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

Nesa Sasser Hartford
Nesa Sasser Hartford (Feb 5, 2020) Feb 5, 2020