CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

Master of Education in Special Education

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SPD-590 1/30/2020 5/13/2020

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________

Alhambra High School

COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Arizona
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________

Susan Epstein
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________

Justina Kwapy
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 1 TOTAL
POINTS 95 points 95 %
10.00 1000 950 100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

High Expectations Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. 1.00
These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 95
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen's students were actively engaged in the warm up and math lesson on Taxes. . She sets high expectations for herself and her students. She provided positive interactions with her
students and has a great rapport with her students!

Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of
the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact
with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and 95 1.00
establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport.
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen's demonstrated respect for diversity of others by embracing and praising all of her students with special needs. She called her students by name and communicated with them with
positive and encouraging words throughout the lesson.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient Distinguished
(Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
80 to 92 93 to 100
The performance of the The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
this disposition and consistently exceeds this
expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
teaching. Candidate during student
teaching.

Fairness Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise
fairness in all areas including assessment. 95 1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen treats all of her students fairly. She ensures all students are supported and actively engaged in the lesson.

Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their
community. 95
Evidence 1.00
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen is a positive role model throughout the school as demonstrated by her kind and positive demeanor. She communicates with parents/guardians and focuses her interest on each
student. She attends professional development opportunities and department meetings.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this 1.00
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Reflection Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should
be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 95
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen is a reflective practitioner that utilizes reflection to improve her craft. She meets with her CT to analyze and plan lessons that will best meet her diverse students' needs.

Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
95
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen utilized technology to enhance the lesson on taxes. Students were very interested in what they are going to be after high school! She used probing questions and gave excellent
examples to support student learning.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Honesty Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
95 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen demonstrates honesty by her words and actions as she interacts with students.

Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others
while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 95
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen is a warm and genuinely friendly educator as demonstrated with her interactions with students. She actively listens to her students' questions and redirected students appropriately
when they were not on task. She was very compassionate about providing real-world experiences for her students!
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence
(The GCU Faculty
Supervisor should create a
plan with the Teacher
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence
There is no evidence that the
performance of the Teacher
Candidate met this
disposition or expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Ineffective
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
1 to 49
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
insufficient in meeting this
disposition and expectations
for a Teacher Candidate
during student teaching.
Foundational
(Teacher Candidates within
this range require a
Professional Growth Plan)
50 to 69
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
underdeveloped in meeting
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Emerging
(Teacher Candidates within
this range may benefit from a
Professional Growth Plan)
70 to 79
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate is
developing in meeting this
disposition and expectations for
a Teacher Candidate during
student teaching.
Proficient
(Target level for Teacher
Candidates)
80 to 92
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate meets
this disposition and
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.
Distinguished
(Usually reserved for master
Teacher Candidates)
93 to 100
The performance of the
Teacher Candidate
consistently exceeds this
disposition and all
expectations for a Teacher
Candidate during student
teaching.

Advocacy Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in
the educational setting. 95 1.00

Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen serves as an advocate for the learning community. She is an active participant in the school. She provided clear expectations and modeled the expectations given to students.

Dedication Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
95
1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Ms. Olnhausen is dedicated to teaching and learning. Her goal is to become a full-time special education teacher. She engages in lessons that promotes learning for all students.
 CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Nicole Olnhausen 20080376

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.

Total Scored Percentage:

95 %
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:
(Optional)

Attachment 2:
(Optional)

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty
Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.

I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

Dr. Justina Kwapy
Dr. Justina Kwapy (Feb 14, 2020) Feb 14, 2020