Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTRODUCTION
1
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
Appraising the performance of individuals, groups and organizations is a
common practice of all societies. While in some instances the appraisal
processes are structured and formally sanctioned, in other instances they are an
informal and integral part of daily activities. Thus, teachers evaluate the
performance of students, bankers evaluate the performance of creditors, parents
evaluate the behavior of the children, and all of us, consciously or
unconsciously evaluate our own actions from time to time.
“Performance appraisal” has been identified as one of the most complex of
man-management activities. It is often a difficult and emotion laden process.
Performance appraisal has become part of organizational life. Every organization has
some kind of evaluating the performance of its personnel.
HISTORY
During and after World War I, systematic performance appraisal was quite
prominent. Credit goes to Walter Dill Scot for systematic performance appraisal
technique of “man-to-man rating system” (merit rating). It was used for evaluating
military officers. Industrial concerns also used this system during 1920s and 1940s
for evaluating hourly paid workers. However, with the increase in training and
management development programs from 1950s, management started adopting
performance appraisal for evaluating technical, skilled, professional and managerial
personnel as a part of training and executive development programmes. With this
evolutionary process, the term merit rating had been changed into employee appraisal
or performance appraisal.
2
MEANING
DEFINITION
3
METHODS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
There are several methods and techniques used for evaluating employee
performance. These may be classified into two broad categories as stated by
C.B.Gupta (1998)
1. Traditional methods
2. Modern methods
TRADITIONAL METHODS
1. CONFIDENTIAL REPORT
A confidential report is a report prepared by the employee’s immediate
superior. It covers the strength and weakness, main achievements and failure,
personality and behavior of the employee. It is descriptive appraisal used for
promotions and transfers of employees.
4
4. PAIRED COMPARISON METHOD
Each employee is compared with all the others, in pair one at a time.
The number of times an employee is judged better than the others determine
his rank. Comparison is made based on overall performance. The number of
comparisons to be made can be decided based on the following:N (N-1)/2.
Where N is the number of person to be compared.
In this technique, the rate is required to distribute his rating in the form
of a normal frequency distribution. This method eliminates the rate bias of
central tendency. It helps to reduce bias involved in straight ranking and
paired comparison.
7. CHECK LIST
MODERN METHODS
1. Appraisal by results MBO
This method has been evolved by “Peter Drucker”. MBO is
potentially a powerful philosophy of managing and an effective way for
operationalising the evaluation process.
6
method and is to test candidate in a social situation. Assessments are made to
determine employee potential for purpose of promotion.
1. Environmental constraints.
These are several environmental constraints, which may outside the control of
worker and to ignore this fact in judging his performance would be unjust. For
example. The quality of raw material in an organization may deteriorate over a period
or the machinery may break down unexpectedly. As a result, both productivity and
quality may suffer. But if selection of materials and maintenance of machinery are
done at higher levels in the organization the performance appraisal of the worker
should not be affected.
2. Organizational leadership
The style of the top leadership of an organization should also be looked into.
It is nature of leadership at the top, which determines largely the loyalty and
commitment of employees to the goals of an organization for better performance.
Employees at every level become highly performance conscious. Performance
appraisal under such conditions is liked by everybody but in opposite conditions it is
considered as an imposition.
3. Interdependence of sub-systems
7
Since every organization is a big system composed of a number of
interdependent sub-systems, the success or failure of any one sub-system has got to be
interpreted in the context of all other sub-systems to which it is related. For example,
the sub-standard output of the production department may be due to the poor quality
of purchases made by the purchasing Department or the trouble may be at some
higher level sub-systems where planning for the production and purchase departments
has been done.
4. Organizational structure
First Impression (primacy effect): Raters form an overall impression about the ratee
on the basis of some particluar characteristics of the ratee identified by them. The
identified qualities and features may not provide adequate base for appraisal.
8
1. Halo Effect: The individual’s performance is completely appraised on the
basis of a perceived positive quality, feature or trait. In other words this is the
tendency to rate a man uniformly high or low in other traits if he is extra-
ordinarily high or low in one particular trait. If a worker has few absences, his
supervisor might give him a high rating in all other areas of work.
2. Horn Effect: The individual’s performance is completely appraised on the
basis of a negative quality or feature perceived. This results in an overall lower
rating than may be warranted. “He is not formally dressed up in the office. He
may be casual at work too!”.
5. Personal Biases: The way a supervisor feels about each of the individuals
working under him - whether he likes or dislikes them - as a tremendous effect
on the rating of their performances. Personal Bias can stem from various
sources as a result of information obtained from colleagues, considerations of
faith and thinking, social and family background and so on.
1 Planning (performance)
2 Managing (performance)
3 Appraising (performance)
1. PERFORMANCE PLANNING
2. PERFORMANCE MANAGING
This is daily process of working towards the performance expectations
established in the planning phase together manager and employee review the
employee’s performance on a periodic basis.
3. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
It is both the beginning and the end point of performance management.
The analysis of past performance provides the basis for planning next years
expectations and at the same time it “close the loop” of the current cycle.
10
During this, employees come to know where they stand and what is expected of
them and what they need to achieve in the next performance period. The design also
come to know what results it can expect from their employees and what resource like
training and development, and counseling are needed to help than to achieve the goal.
By the end of Second World War, alkyl aryl sulphonates swamped the
detergent market over alcohol sulphates that later proved to be highly useful in the
shampoo industry.
The major uses of earlier detergents were in hand dishwashing and fine fabric
laundering. In 1946, came an important breakthrough in the development of
detergents for all-purpose laundry applications, when the first "built" detergent
11
(containing a builder/surfactant combination) was offered in the U.S. Surfactant is a
basic cleaning agent of a detergent product, while a builder helps a surfactant to
function more effectively. Phosphate compounds were used as builders in these
detergents, which significantly improved their performance, thereby making them
idealforcleaningheavilysoiledlaundry.
Between 1950 and 1965, more than half of the detergents were based on the
formula of a propylene tetramer conjugated to benzene (PT benzene), but later they
were blamed for a rise in eutrophication in lakes and streams as they contain
phosphates (from Sodium triphosphate). Although the problem has not been
completely resolved in some cases, in some countries there has been an agreement for
reducing the uses of phosphates however in countries where it is not a big issue no
such action has been taken. The problem was set down to the branched chain
formation of PT benzene that resulted in the bacteria's' inability to degrade them.
Straight-chain alcohols are degradable, hence the steps were taken to form and
produce a linear alkyl benzene molecule.
By the year 1953, the sale of detergents in US had surpassed those of soap.
During that time, the detergents have all but replaced soap-based products that were
used for laundering, dishwashing and household cleaning. Alone or in combination
with soaps, the use of detergents started in many of the bars and liquids used for
personal cleaning.
Since those early discoveries in the chemistry and technique of detergents and
builders, developments have been continued that focuses on achieving more efficient
and easy to use detergent products. Now the manufacturers give an important
consideration to safety for consumers and the environment as well. Given below is a
brief summary of important inventions over the years of the history of detergents.
1950s
12
1960s
• Laundry powders with enzymes
• Prewash soil and stain removers
• Enzyme presoaks
1970s
• Fabric softeners (sheets and wash-cycle added)
• Multifunctional products (e.g., detergent with fabric softener)
1980s
• Automatic dishwasher liquids
• Detergents for cooler water washing
1990s
• Ultra (super concentrated) powder and liquid detergents
• Automatic dishwasher gels
A Dream Unfolds Started in the 1970's, Power Soaps was established as the
Gold Company and operated with a single unit at Kodai Road, Dindigul Dist,
Tamilnadu. It was founded by Krishna Nadar, a visionary entrepreneur who believed
that there existed a great demand for quality yet affordable detergent soaps. His sharp
business acumen and astute strategies paved the way for the rapid growth of the
13
brand. He built the business on the strong foundation of ethics and building enduring
customer relationships
After R Krishnan Nadar's regime, the mantle was taken over by his son
K.Dhanapal who took it to newer heights and the company expanded. In 1998,
detergent powder was introduced and this was an extremely successful venture
Three more manufacturing units Power Soaps Limited at Puducherry, Abirami
Chemicals Pondicherry and Praveen Chem Industry at Karaikal were added to
meet the increasing demand for Power products.
The next step was to consolidate all brands under one umbrella and this was
done through creating the Power Soaps identity. This created a leap in brand value
and image. Later, Power exited the soft drink and water business to sharpen the focus
on detergents and personal care
Power Soaps with its huge bouquet of detergent and personal care brands has
a huge presence across South India and exports to countries like the Gulf. The quality
products have been appreciated by customers making it a household name. The
brands are backed by a strong manufacturing infrastructure with plants in
Sembiapalayam. Gummudipoondi, Periyapalayan, Silvassa and Karaikal.
Power Soaps has always stayed at the forefront of technology, innovation and
quality built on a backbone of a strong infrastructure. State-of-art technology and
equipment are the norm at every plant. Quality processes and the Best Practices
ensure that what reaches each customer is world class quality at an affordable cost.
14
This allows us to control the quality and maintain the consistency of products.
The plants are manned by dedicated and efficient technical personnel with domain
expertise who keep operations moving smoothly.
Power Soaps Limited has been certified with ISO 9001: 2000 by the
to ethical business practices and qualitative approach has given us an edge over the
other leading organizations. Right from the initial stage of procurement of raw
material till the final delivery of the consignment, to undertake stringent quality
control measures.
Transport
Country : India
City : Karaikal
Keezhavanjore village,
15
Nagore Post ,Karailal-611002
No of workers : 523
Hygienic Water
• Refiners
• Cutters
• Stampers and
• Wrappers
• Bleaching
• Drying
• Crutchers
• Atomisers
16
• Plodders
• Roll Mills
• Binding
Product Profile
Raw Materials
Washing soda
Acid Sullary
China clay
Dolomite
Sodium Silicate
Caustic Soda
Sodia acid
Sodium sulphate
Process Section
Detergent Bars
The detergent bar machinery makes solid washing blocks which are used
for hand washing clothes in cold water, where there are high concentrations of
17
minerals in the water. These regions are typically South and Central America and
Central East Africa
The equipment is visually similar to toilet soap machinery, but the design and
components are much stronger because detergents are much harder.
Detergent Powders
Detergent Powder comes in two varieties, dense and light. Dense powders
Weigh over 500 grams per litre and are made by dry mixing ingredients together.
Light powders are made by mixing a detergent slurry, then spraying droplets of slurry
into a rising column of hot air, which dries them to powder. We make Dense Powder
production equipment.
• Batch Weighers
• Screw Conveyors
• Production Platforms
• Batch Mixers
Finishing
18
The final stage of soap manufacturing process, finishing stage involves
mixing of additives, such as colors, preservatives, and perfume into soap,
which is then shaped into bars for sale
Finishing Equipment
• Mixers
• Simplex Plodders
• Refiners
• Elevating Conveyors
The final stage of the detergents and soap manufacturing process is the
packaging. In this stage, the finished product is packed for final supply to consumer.
During the packaging stage, bar soaps are either wrapped or cartooned in single packs
or multipacks. Detergents, including household cleaners, dishwashing cleansers and
laundry cleansers are packaged in cartons, bottles, pouches, bags or cans.
• The product can be packed in different sizes to meet the varying demands of
consumers
• Small sachets - for offering products in very small quantity for one time use.
Generally powder detergents and washing gels are offer in sachets.
• Cartoons - Soaps and detergents are offered in cartoons for bulk supply.
20
• Poly packs - Soaps and detergents are offered in poly packs of different sizes
to meet the varying demands of consumers.
• Tubes - Tubes are most widely used for packaging personal care and cosmetic
products.
• Paper wrap - Soap bars are generally wrapped or cartooned in single packs or
multi packs for the convenience of users.
• Sealing machine
• Cutting machine
• Saponification section
• Roller machine
• Stamping machine
• Mixer machine
Home Care, Personal care, Soaps and Detergents with different brands.
Home Care:
21
1. Detergent Cake
• Triple Power
• Active Power
• Hi Power
• Power Jumbo
• Tyko
Triple Power(Blue)
Give your clothes lime freshness with this detergent cake that strips the dirt
and leaves your clothes clean and fresh. Available in convenient sizes of 150 gms,
300 gms
Get the stain fighters in this detergent work for you and make your life easier.
A great wash with the least effort. Available in convenient size 200 gms.
Blue skies and fresh clean spring days are back with this detergent. The
intensive citric cleansing agent leaves you feeling like you are wearing new clothes
everyday, Available in convenient sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms, 300 gms.
The superb lathering formula gives your clothes the total clean that you are
looking for. Keeping your whites stunning and your coloured clothes dazzling.
Available in convenient sizes of 125gms, 150 gms, and 250 gms.
The rich lather penetrates into the pores of the fabric and brings out all the
dirt. Great for whites and coloured clothes as well.Available in convenient sizes of
125gms, 150 gms, and 250 gms.
22
The unique lathering formula help you give your clothes a clean wash quickly
and easily. Perfect to keep your whites looking sparkling white and coloured clothes
bright. Available in convenient sizes of 125gms, 150 gms, and 250 gms.
Power Jumbo(Blue,Yellow,Pink)
Power Jumbo Blue has strong stain fighting agents that penetrate well into the
fabric and eliminate dirt and grime with powerful action. This leaves your
clotheslooking fresh with a pleasant fragrance. Keeps colours bright..Available in
convenient sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms, 300 gms.
Power Jumbo Yellow has a sunny citrus cleansing agent that works its way
deep into fabrics and cleans them. Keeps colours bright and leaves a lingering
fragrance on clothes. Available in convenient sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms,
300 gms
Power Jumbo Pink is the colour of perfect health. The ideal way to keep your
clothes free from germs and dirt. Leaves clothes with a plesant fragrance.. Available
in convenient sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms, 300 gms
Tyko(Blue,Yellow,Pink)
Blue skies and fresh clean spring days are back with this detergent. The
intensive citric cleansing agent leaves you feeling like you are wearing new clothes
everyday, Available in convenient sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms, 300 gms
Bright yellow symbolises the sunny citrus cleansing agent that deep cleans
fabrics and keeps colours true. Leaving a lingering fragrance on clothes. Available in
convenient sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms, 300 gms
Pink is the colour of perfect health. Keep your clothes free from germs and
dirt with this detergent that helps you stay clean and hygienic. Available in convenient
sizes of 125gms, 200 gms, 250 gms, 300 gms
2. Detergent Powder
23
• Triple power
• Active Power
• Tyko
Triple Power
The Triple Power range of detergents and powders are formulated with lime
which is a powerful deep cleanser. It cleans the dirt besides leaving clothes fragrant.
Active Power
Active Power is packed with stain fighters that fight even tough dirt and
grime. These penetrate deep into the fabric to release even tiny dirt particles leaving
clothes wonderfully clean.
Unleash the awesome power of fresh lime to give your clothes a sparkling
clean wash. This detergent leaves your clothes fragrant and super clean. Priced
perfectly to suit your household budget. Available in 20gm sachets, 200 gms, 250
gms, 500 gms and 1 kg packs.
Tyko
24
CHAPTER – II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
25
2.1 Review Of Literature
Moulder (2001) states that performance appraisals are valued for defining
expectations and measuring the extent to which expectations are met. She goes on to
state that appraisals can make clear to employees where they are having success and
26
Moulder indicates that appraisals are useful in setting goals and in fostering
supervisors.
for the organization to use in controlling employees (Eichel and Bender, 1981).
Eichel and Bender go on to state that past performance was used to guide or
justify management’s actions in dealing with the employee. At the time, according to
these authors, performance appraisal provided the basis for salary, retention,
Over the past quarter century, the purpose of performance appraisal has shifted
Vroom (1990) states that formal performance appraisal plans can be designed
He stresses the need for effective evaluation as it can effectively serve these
critical areas.
ICMA (2005) states that almost all employees are eager to know how well
they are doing in their jobs, but many dread the meetings in which their performance
is to be discussed.
27
28
CHAPTER - III
RESEARCH DESIGN
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
To find out the satisfactory level of the employer about performance appraisal
30
PRIMARY DATA
SECONDARY DATA
PRIMARY DATA
Primary data are original sources from which the researcher directly collects
data. The main source of primary was collected through questionnaire.
SECONDARY DATA
The secondary data are the sources containing data which have been collected
and compiled for another purpose.
• External data
Website
Books
Journals
• Percentage analysis
• Weighted average
• Chi square
3.7.1PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
No of respondent
Percentage = ×100
Total no of respondents
31
3.7.2 WEIGH TED AVERAGE VALUE
∑WX
Weighted average value =
∑W
W=No of respondents
W=Total respondents
∑ (O-E) 2
X2 =
∑E
Oij=Observed frequency
Eij=
Grand total
The period of the study is from 1st January to 30th April . During this period the
researcher has collected the necessary primary data and other relevant information
needed to carry out the study.
The study was conducted among the employees of Praveen Chem Industry
in Karaikal.
1. The respondent attitude did not allow me to get their true feelings.
32
2. Most of the respondent feared to give their name.
3. Most of the employees were busy with their tight work and they don’t want to
be disturbed.
4. Employees are very limited and duration is limited.
33
CHAPTER – IV
4.1Percentage analysis
Percentage analysis is the method to represent raw streams of data as a percentage for
better understanding of collected data.
No of respondent
Percentage = ×100
Total no of respondents
34
Table: 4.1.1
2 30-40 10 19.2
3 40-50 13 25
4 50-60 15 28.3
5 60-70 6 11.5
Total 52 100
Figure: 4.1.1
Age group of the worker
Inference
35
From the above table 15.3% of employees fall under the age group of 20-30
years. About 19.2% of employees are under the age group of 30-40 years. 25% of
employees are comes under 40-50 years and 28.3% of employees are comes under 50-
60 years and 11.5% of employees are above 60-70 years of age.
Table: 4.1.2
2 Female 17 33
Total 52 100
Figure: 4.1.2
36
Inference
The above table shows that 67% of employees are Male 33% of employees are
female.
Table: 4.1.3
Educational
SL.NO No of respondents Percentage
qualification
1 SSLC 17 32.6
2 HSC 20 38.4
4 Graduate 15 28.8
Total 52 100
Figure: 4.1.3
37
Source: Primary data
Inference
The above table reveals clear that about 32.6% of the employees have SSLC
qualification and 38.4% of employees have HSC qualification and 28.8% have
completed their Graduate course.
Table: 4.1. 4
Figure: 4.1.4
38
Inference
From the above table we infer that 30.7 % of the employees have below 5
years of experience and 32.6 % of the employees have experience between 5-10
years, 36.5 % of the employees have the experience between 10-16 years
Table: 4.1.5
Figure: 4.1.5
39
Inference
The above table denotes 27% of employees earns above rupees 3000 as a monthly
income. 29% of employees earn above 6000 rupees and 44% of employees earn above
10000 rupees as salary
Appraisal system
Table 4.1.6
40
The table shows the way in which the performance appraisal system helps in the
future growth
Way it helps
Total 52 100
Figure 4.1.6
Inference
Table 4.1.7
41
The table shows the way in which the training program helps
Way it helps
Once Twice Thrice More than
% %
in a in a in a % value thrice in a % value
Training value value
year year year year
program helps
Figure 4.1.7
42
Table 4.1.8
yes 47 90.4
No 5 9.6
Figure 4.1.8
Inference
90.4 % of employees tell that they had improved themselves after the appraisal and
9.6 % of has not improved in program
Table 4.1.9
The Table shows the Parameters included in the performance appraisal system
Dependability 40 76.9
43
Figure 4.1.8
Inference
79.9% said that dependability 23.1 % said that the parameter interpersonal
Skill is to be included in the appraisal form
Table 4.1.9
44
No of respondents Transparency
Figure 4.1.9
Inference
Table 4.1.10
The table shows the Level of changes After the Negative Remarks Quoted
May be 6 11.6
45
No 5 9.6
Figure 4.1.10
Inference
78.8 % said yes and they have changed themselves after telling their negative
remarks. The company is responsible to make changes in the employees after the
appraisal. Only 11.6% of the employees said that may be they would not change
themselves after the negative remarks. 9.6 % of employees said that no changes .
Table 4.1.11
46
Parameters Benefit/Chance
Clarification Yes % Value No % Value
Yes 48 92.3 2 40
N0 4 7.7 3 60
Figure 4.1.11
Inference
92.3% said that they had got chance for further clarification and they got
benefit by it. 60% Employees said that does’nt have any benefit or clarification .The
organization has to tell about what are benefits they will get after appraisal, so that the
level of employees can increased.
Table 4.1.12
47
Name of the Yes No May be
Parameters parameter % % %
Training Program 40 60 -
I Future Growth 94 6 -
Improvement 90 10 -
II Try to Change 78.8 11.6 9.6
Transparency 88.5 11.5 -
III Further 92.3 7.7 -
Clarification
Figure 4.1.12
Approximately more than 90% of the employees are satisfied with the above-
mentioned parameters. Around 5% of the employees are highly satisfied for only few
parameters. Around 4% of the employees are dissatisfied for few parameters
mentioned above. Only 3 of the highly dissatisfied for the parameter company
policies.
∑WX
Weighted average value =
∑W
W=No of respondents
W=Total respondents
Table: 4.2.1
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Measurement through 27 10 10 1 4 4.05
Proper Record Keeping
Figure: 4.2.1
49
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.05 % of employees are highly satisfied by it
helps for the future growth and 3.32 % of employees are satisfied in measurement
through proper record keeping 2.71 % highly dissatisfied in the nature of the
appraiser.
Table: 4.2.2
Measurement of job knowledge, Quality of work
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Handling of Work
2 10 20 13 7 2.75
Independentily
Achievements based on
25 16 3 6 2 4.07
org. goal
It help for the future
10 25 5 4 8 3.48
growth
Personal interest
2 7 10 4 29 2.01
contributing to org. goal
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS-
Highly Dissatified
WA: Weighted Average
Source: Primary data
Figure: 4.2.2
50
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.07 % of employees are highly satisfied in
achievements based on org goal and 3.48 are satisfied it helps for future growth 2.75
are neutral in handling of work independently 2.01 are highly dissatisfied personal
interest contributing to org goal.
Table: 4.2.3
Measurement of writing and oral abilities
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Measurement through
27 20 4 - 1 4.38
addressing the meetings
Proper record keeping 15 25 5 4 3 3.86
Nature of the Appraiser 5 6 9 15 17 2.36
It help for the future growth 6 3 24 10 9 2.78
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS- Highly
Dissatified
Figure: 4.2.3
51
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.38 % of employees are highly satisfied in
measurement through addressing the meetings 3.86 are satisfied in proper record
keeping 3.78 are neutral for its future growth 2.36 are highly dissatisfied in nature
of the appraiser .
Table: 4.2.4
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Coordination among the
10 5 17 9 11 2.88
employees
Willingness to learn the job 10 19 2 10 11 3.21
Nature of the Appraiser 3 12 11 11 15 2.55
It help for the future growth 20 17 1 5 9 3.65
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS-
Highly Dissatified
Figure 4.2.4
52
Inference
In the above table infers that 3.65 % of employees are highly satisfied in helps
for future growth 3.21 are satisfied in willingness to learn the job 2.88 are neutral in
coordination among the employees 2.55 are highly dissatisfied in nature of the
appraiser .
Table: 4.2.5
Measurement of accepting and implementing change
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Higher Authorities referrred 15 3 20 5 9 3.19
Taking immediate action 5 7 9 14 17 2.40
Proper record keeping 10 10 2 15 15 2.17
Referring the manual 2 16 19 5 10 2.90
It help for the future growth 20 16 6 7 3 3.82
Nature of the appraiser 15 19 6 2 10 3.59
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS-
Highly Dissatified
Figure 4.2.5
53
Measurement of accepting and implementing change
Inference
In the above table infers that 3.82 % of employees are highly satisfied in helps
for future growth 3.59 are satisfied in nature of the appraiser 3.19 are neutral in
Higher authorities reffered 2.90 dissatisfied in referring the manual and 2.71 and 2.40
highly dissatisfied in proper record keeping and taking immediate action .
Table: 4.2.6
Measurements of Absenteeism Rate
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Figure 4.2.6
54
Measurements of Absenteeism Rate
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.17 % of employees are highly satisfied in
proper timing 3.28 are satisfied in proper record keeping 3.15 are neutral in nature of
the appraiser 2.55 dissatisfied in helps for the future growth
Table: 4.2.7
Measurements of Flexibility
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Figure 4.2.7
Measurements of Flexibility
55
Inference
In the above table infers that 3.84 % of employees are highly satisfied for it
helps for future growth 3.23 are satisfied in nature of the appraiser 2.44 highly
dissatisfied in proper record keeping
Table 4.2.6
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Measure the personality 27 22 - 1 2 4.36
Interest toward the job 10 11 10 11 10 3
Proper record keeping 11 5 9 10 17 2.67
It help for the future growth 17 20 6 7 2 3.82
Nature of the appraiser 12 8 15 10 7 3.30
56
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS-
Highly Dissatified
Figure 4.2.8
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.36 % of employees are highly satisfied to
measure the personality 3.82 are satisfied in helps for the future growth 3.30 neutrally
in nature of the appraiser 3 dissatisfied in interest towards the job 2.67 highly
dissatisfied in proper record .
Table 4.2.9
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Existing Measurement and
15 12 7 8 10 3.26
policies
It help for the future growth 20 17 5 3 7 3.76
Nature of the appraiser 11 12 5 10 14 2.92
57
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatified, HDS-
Highly Dissatified
Figure 4.2.9
Inference
3.76 of employees are highly satisfied it helps for the future growth 3.26 are
existing measurement and policies 2.92 are dissatisfied it for the nature of the
appraiser
Table 4.2.10
58
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Existing Measurement and
12 15 10 7 8 3.30
skills
It help for the future
20 17 10 2 3 3.94
growth
Nature of the appraiser 10 2 8 10 22 2.38
Figure 4.2.10
Inference
In the above table infers that 3.94 % of employees are highly satisfied for it
helps for the future growth 3.30 satisfied among the existing measurement and
objectivity 2.38 highly dissatisfied among the nature of appraiser.
Table 4.2.11
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
Existing Measurement and
18 15
59 10 2 7 3.67
objectivity
It help for the future
20 20 9 2 1 4.07
growth
Nature of the appraiser 15 4 15 13 5 3.21
HS- Highly satisfied, S- Satisfied , N- Neutral, DS- Dissatisfied, HDS-
Highly Dissatified
Figure 4.2.11
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.07% of employees are highly satisfied for it
helps for the future growth 3.67satisfied among the existing measurement and
objectivity 3.21 neutraly satisfied among the nature of appraiser
Table: 4.2.12
Particulars HS S N DS HDS WA
60
Punctuality and
27 10 10 1 4 4.05
dicipline
Absenteeism 25 18 5 1 3 4.17
Flexibility 19 19 3 7 4 3.80
Learn and
20 17 1 5 9 3.65
communication
Figure 4.2.12
61
Inference
In the above table infers that 4.38 % of employees are highly satisfied in
writing and oral in performance appraisal system among the company (4.36) personal
grooming and (4.07) guest relation and (4.05) Punctuality and discipline and (4.07)
job knowledge are Satisfied by the appraisal system in their working organization ()
flexibility (3.80) company policies are neutral about their working organisation (3.82)
implement change are dissatisfied
Chi square test is applied in statistics to test the goodness of fit to verify the
distribution of observed data with assumed theoretical distribution.
∑ (O-E) 2
X2 =
∑E
Oij=Observed frequency
62
Eij= Expected frequency
Eij=
Grand total
Level of significance is 5%
Table: 4.3.1
Null Hypothesis: The age level of employees doesnot influence the ability to
accept ,implement the change and plan to take decision
Alternative Hypothesis: The age level of employees influence the ability to accept,
implement the change and plan to take decision.
∑2 = 19.8
=8
Conclusion
The tabulate value =15.5 is less than the calculated value 19.8.so there is no
Relationship between the Age level of employees to ability to accept implement the
change and plan to make decision.
Table 4.3.2
Communicate
Education
SSLC HSC GRADUATE
Level of
Satisfaction
High 12 5 7
Medium 3 5 7
Low 2 10 1
64
Null Hypothesis: The education level of employees does not influence of employees
influence the ability to learn and communicate
∑2 = 15.25
=4
Conclusion
The tabulate value = 9.488 is less than the calculated value 15.25.So
there is no Relationship between the education level of employees in ability to learn
and communicate
Table 4.3.3
65
Experience
∑2=8.91
=4
Conclusion
66
The tabulate value = 9.488 is less than the calculated value 8.912. So there is
no relationship between the Experience Level of Employees in job knowledge quality
of work and time of work.
CHAPTER – V
67
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS
• 37% of the employees have the experience level between 10-16 years.
• 44% of the employees have the income level from 10000 & above
• 25 % of employees said that get increments for the way in which the
Performance Appraisal System helps for Future Growth.
68
• The parameter used Dependability of PAS as 40 % of employees are satisfied
• 46 %said that they have changed themselves after telling their negative
remarks
• 48% said that they had got chance for further clarification and they got benefit
by it.
• 49% of the employees said that performance appraisal helps for future growth.
46 % of the employees said that the system is transparent. 48% said that there
is chance for further clarification. Around 47 % said that they would try to
change themselves after the negative remark quotated in the appraisal form
• The weighted average value says that 4.05 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their Punctuality and discipline and 3.32% of employees are satisfied it
helps for future growth
• The weighted average value says that 4.07 % of employees are highly satisfied
with thei job knowledge and 3.48 % of employees are satisfied it helps for
future growth
• The weighted average value says that 4.38 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their learning and communication and 3.86 % of employees are satisfied
• The weighted average value says that 3.65 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their learning and communication abilities and 3.21 % of employees are
satisfied in willingness to learn the job
• The weighted average value says that 3.82 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their implementing the change and 3.59 % of employees are satisfied in
nature of the appraiser.
• The weighted average value says that 4.17 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their ansenteeism rate and 3.28 % of employees are in proper record
keeping .
69
• The weighted average value says that 4.05 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their writing and oral abilities and 3.32 % of employees are satisfied it
helps for future growth
• The weighted average value says that 3.84 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their flexibility and 3.23 % of employees are satisfied in nature of the
appraiser.
• The weighted average value says that 4.36 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their personal grooming and 3.82 % of employees are satisfied it helps
for future growth
• The weighted average value says that 3.76 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their company policies and 3.26 % of employees are satisfied in existing
in objectivity
• The weighted average value says that 3.94% of employees are highly satisfied
with their computer skills and 3.30 % of employees are satisfied it helps for
future growth
• The weighted average value says that 4.07 % of employees are highly satisfied
with their guest relation and 3.21% of employees are satisfied in nature of the
appraiser.
• The Chi square test says that there is no Relationship between the Age level
of employees to ability to accept implement the change and plan to make
decision.
• The chi square test says that there is no Relationship between the education
level of employees in ability to learn and communicate
70
• The Chi square test says that there is no relationship between the Experience
Level of Employees in job knowledge quality of work and time of work.
SUGGESTIONS
71
After appraisal program if there is any improvement, the employees should be
motivated by Promotion, Increments etc.
CONCLUSION
72
The company should conduct the similar type of research at regular
interval to know the changing attitude of workers and to know about their
improvement in order to motivate them.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Websites
1. www.PerformanceAppraisal.com
2. www.HRlibrary.com
3. www.appraisal .org.com
BOOKS
1. Research methodology
By -C.R. Kothari
2. Statistics
73
V. Bhagavathi
By -John M Ivancevich
By -K. Aswathappa
By Snell Bohlander
APPENDIX
74
APPENDICES
“A STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EXISTING PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL SYSTEM” – In Praveen chem Industry, Karaikal.
QUESTIONNAIRE
PERSONAL DETAILS
1) Name:
2) Designation:
3) Age:
4) Gender:
a) Male b) Female
5) Educational qualification:
6) Experience:
a) Below 5 years
75
b) 5-10 years
c) 10-16 years
7) Income:
1)Are you satisfied with the method used to measure the Punctuality and Discipline in the
existing performance appraisal system?
2) Are you satisfied with the method used to measure the Job Knowledge, Quality of
Work, Effective Time at Work and Attitude towards Work in the existing
performance appraisal system?
the Change, to For See Problem and Plan and to take Decision at Short Notice in the
7.Are you satisfied with the method used to measure the Flexibility in the existing
performance appraisal system?
8.Are you satisfied with the method used to measure the Personal Grooming in the
existing performance appraisal system?
77
9)Are you satisfied with the method used to measure the Knowledge on the Company
policies in the existing performance appraisal system?
10). Are you satisfied with the method used to measure the Education and Computer
Skills in the existing performance appraisal system?
12. Do you think that performance appraisal system help for the future growth?
Yes No
13. After the appraisal program is any training program conducted.
Yes No
78
13.a) If yes, how many times you have attended the training program
Dependability.
16.a) If yes, is there is any communication regarding the negative remark given by
the appraiser.
Yes No
17. Have you tried to change yourself after the negative remarks quoted in the
performance appraisal system?
18. Have you been given any chance for further clarification about the negative
remarks, after you have been appraised?
79
19. Can you suggest some methods and tools to measure the parameters in
the performance appraisal system?
80