Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Search
Results
Exit
GO BACK
Regression Analysis of
Ship Characteristics
G.P. Piko
@ Commonwealth of Australia 1 9 8 0
. length;
. breadth;
. draught; and
container capacity;
. container ships;
. roll on-roll off ships (ro-ro) ;
. bulk carriers;
iii
.ore carriers;
. tankers;
. general cargo ships; and
. passenger ships.
R.W.L. Wyers
Assistant Director
Planning and Technology
iv
CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD iii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
ANNEXCALTERNATIVEMODELS:REGRESSION
COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS 113
V
TABLES
Page
1 Length:
Regression
Coefficients and Statistics 92
3 Draught:
Regression
Coefficients and Statistics 94
4 GrossRegisteredTons:RegressionCoefficients
and Statistics 95
5 NetRegisteredTons:RegressionCoefficients
and Statistics 96
8 Speed:RegressionCoefficientsandStatistics 100
9 Container
Capacity:
Regression Coefficients and 101
Statistics
vi
FIGURES
Page
2 VariableFormatCardImage 11
5 II l1
RO-ro Ships 27
6 I1 11
Bulk Carriers 28
7 11 I,
Ore Carriers 29
8 I1 11
Tankers 30
9 II I1
General Cargo Ships 31
10 II ,I
Passenger Ships 32
12 l1 ,I
RO-ro Ships 34
13 I, II
Bulk Carriers 35
14 I, 11
Ore Carriers 36
15 I1 II
Tankers 37
vii
Page
16 II It Ships
Cargo
General 38
II
', 17 II Ships
Passenger 39
18Draught v Deadweight.ContainerShips 40
19 n I1 RO-ro Ships 41
20 11 n Carriers
Bulk 42
21 11 11
Ore Carriers 43
22 II II Tankers 44
23 11 II Ships
General
Cargo 45
24 11 II Ships
Passenger 46
25 GrossRegisteredTons v Deadweight.Container
Ships 47
26 II 11 11 II RO- ro S h i p s 48
II II
27 11 11
Bulk
Carriers 49
II I1 I1
28 11
Ore
Carriers 50
29 II II I1 Tankers 51
11 11 II
30 General
Cargo Ships 52
viii
Page
31 Passenger
Ships 53
II It IIII
33 RO- ro Sh i PS 55
II II II
34 Bulk
Carriers 56
II II II
35 11
Ore
Carriers 57
II n 58
36 l1
Tankers
l1 II l1 11
37 General
Cargo Ships 59
n II n
38 11
Passenger
Ships 60
11 II
40 RO- ro S h i p s 62
41 n 11
63
Bulk Carriers
42 11 I,
Ore Carriers 64
43 11 It Tanker-s 65
44 11 n 66
General Cargo Ships
ix
Page
45 II I1 Passenger
Ships 67
II
47 I1
RO- ro Sh i ps 69
48 II I1 Carriers Bulk 70
49 11 I1 Carriers Ore 71
50 I1 Tankers 72
II
51 11
General Cargo
Ships 73
52 I1 II
Passenger
Ships 74
Container
Ships 75
54 RO- ro Ships 76
55 Bulk
Carriers 77
56 Ore Carriers 78
57 Tankers 79
58 General Cargo 80
Sh i ps
X
Page
-
I,
61 11
Ro-ro Ships 83
I1
62 11
Bulk Carriers 84
II II
63 Ore Carriers 85
,I I1
64 Tankers 86
I1 It
65 General Cargo Ships 87
It I,
66 Passenger Ships 88
X1
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
length;
. breadth;
. draught;
. gross registered tons (GRT);
. net registered tons (NRT);
. age;
. power;
. speed; and
. container capacity.
1
The length, breadth, draught and container capacity of ships
are of interest because they each influence the port facilities
required to handle a given ship. The power and speed of ships
affect such factors as fuel consumption and travel time, and
therefore are of interest in many shipping studies.
2
The variation in the characteristics of ships from these
different categories is sufficiently great to justify analysing
each ship type separately. Also, most port studies, including
those of the BTE, need to consider separately the facilities
for various ship types.
While the major aim of this project wasto provide a data base
which satisfied the requirements of the dependent BTE shipping
and port projects, an endeavour has been madeto present the
results in a format suitable for use by others working in related
fields. The presentation of results includes tabulation of the
regression coefficients and statistics for each model. However,
to further assist interpretation of the results a series of
figures is included which shows each regression model, together
with its 95 per cent confidence interval, superimposed on a plot
of the sample data. These figures not only illustrate the
relationship derived between each variableand deadweight, but
also provide other valuable information including:
. the upper limit o f the variable that occursin the sample data.
3
CHAPTER 2 - DESCRIPTION OF THE DATA AND OUTLINEOF THE ANALYSIS
. name;
. owner and manager's name;
. detailed specification of the hull;
. detailed specification of the equipment and propulsion systems;
. ship type;
I ship builder;
. engine builder; and
. country of registry.
4
Most data items are recorded in a clearly defined numeric or
alphanumeric field, which makes computer analysis convenient.
An example of a typical fixed format card of data is shown in
Figure 1. Characters 4-10 contain a Lloyd's Register number
which identifies the ship, and the data items are recorded in
fixed locations after the card type code. Occasionally, however,
an item of data is recorded in a field without fixed content
or format. An example of a variable format field is shown in
Figure 2. It is difficult to extract the data from a field of
this type because the information does not always occur at the
same position on the card.
5
25474180--2
. age -
years since the ship was built (to the time of
publication of the data, 1977);
very good;
good ;
acceptable for analysis purposes;
should be treated with caution if used in analysis; and
poor.
6
only relevant to container ships), i.e. ships with incomplete
data were excluded. By using only ships for which all the
relevant information was available, the sample was restricted
to ships for which the data were likely to be most reliable.
7
. contains those ships in service at May 1977;
The data files were very large, therefore, the first step
of the analysis was to delete all the ships that were not
relevant so that the subsequent data preparation was performed
on much smaller files which were simpler and cheaper to
manipulate. The data preparation was performed using three
computer programs: DATAPREPl, DATAPREP2 and DATAPREP3. Figures
3(a) , 3(b) and 3(c) illustrate the major functions of these
programs in diagrammatic form.
8
Tables 1-9 contain information on the form of the regression
model recommended in each instance, together with the regression
estimates of the coefficients and the It' and IR21 statistics.
For large samples, if the absolute value of the t-statistic is
greater than 1.96 then the regression coefficient is
significantly different from zero, i.e. that term in the
regression is making a significant contribution in explaining
the variance of the sample data. The R 2 statistic represents
the proportion of the variance in the data that can be explained
by the regression model. However, the R 2 statistic cannot be
compared from one regression model to another.
9
CARD
TYPE
T21
1 2 3 8 9 1011 12131415
5 6 7 4
I I I
I FEET INS I
mm
23 24 25 26 27
SMALLER
mfflae EI41m
FEET INS
282930 31 32
FRACTION
FEET
33343536
LARGER/OR ONLY
INS FRACTION
LENGTH
REGISTERED BETWEEN BREADTH DEPTH
LENGTH PERPENDICULARS MOULDED MOULDED
T370 1 9 5 0 / 2 0 '
/ "
A0 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415
l
LOAD THESE CARDS INTO THE
OUTPUT ARRAY
S STOP
12
BUFFER IN THE INFORMATION FORSHIPONE
LOCATE CARDS
l
WITH TONNAGE, DIMENSIONS
AND AGE
LOADTHE
l
INFORMATION
INTO O U T P U T ARRAY
1
DETERMINE SHIP PROPULSION TYPE
l
1
I ISTHIS A CONTAINER
NO
SHIP?
LOCATE INFORMATION
CONTAINER CAPACITY
ON
l
GIVEN SHIP PROPULSION TYPE,
LOCATE
CARDSWITH INFORMATION LOAD INFORMATION
INTO
ON POWER OUTPUT ARRAY
4 IS INFORMATION
POWER? ON
AVAILWLE
I
YES
,
LOCATE CARD
WITH INFORMATION ON SPEED
I I
l r
1 I
LOAD INFORMATION ONSPEED INTO OUTPUT
ARRAY I
B UFFER OUT INFORMATION FOR
SHIP ONE
f
IS THIS THE FINAL SHIP ON FILE?
13
INPUT INFORMATION ON TONNAGE AND
b DIMENSIONS FOR ONE SHIP 4
(IFRELEVANT)
YES
ARE THERE ANY BLANK FIELDS?
NO
IS THIS THE FINAL SHIP ON FILE?
YES
STOP
14
CHAPTER 3 - DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
. Length = a. (DWT)3 .E
. Breadth = a. (DWT)B .E
. Draught = a. (DWT)B .E
15
There are a number of physical relationships which determine
the length/breadth and length/draught ratios for a ship which
minimise the resistive force a ship experiences asit progresses
through the water. However, the relationships derived between
deadweight and length, deadweight and breadth, and deadweight
and draught do not reflect any such physical relationship.
Rather, they are the result of designing the lowest cost ship
to handle a particular. trade given that length, breadth and
draught are constrained by factors such as the physical
dimensions of the ports at which the ship is intended to
operate. Some of the effects of these constraints on the sample
d.ata are readily apparent- in Figures 4-24. The most obvious
of these effects is the clear upper limit of thirty-two metres
for the breadth of a container ship (Figure 11). This obviously
corresponds to the 'third genera,tion' container ships which are
constrained by the width of the Panama Canal. A number of other
graphs (for example Figures 6, 8, 16, 22 and 23) also seem to
be bounded by an upper limit. It is apparent, therefore, that
the relationships derived in this paper reflect the combined
influence of the many criteria that the designer of a ship must
consider, for example:
. minimum cost;
. maximum carrying capacity; and
. constraints on length, breadth, draught.
16
TONNAGE
17
AG E
The fact that ships are deleted from the Register as they are
withdrawn from service suggests that the sample on which the
regressions were performed probably provides aclose
approximation to the ships constructed in recent years, but for
earlier years a smaller proportion of ships actually constructed
would remain in the sample.
Due to the fact that there is a large range of ship sizes built
in any one year, it is not reasonable to generate an equation
which will describe age for a ship type simplyas a function
of deadweight. Therefore, a linear model was fitted to the date
purely to check whether or not there is a trend for the size
of ships being built to increase with time. Table 6 shows the
regression coefficients and statistics for the model
Age = CI + B. (DWT) + E
18
ro-ro or passenger ships while for all other ship types the
regression was significant and showed a negative correlation
between age and deadweight, i.e. the larger ships tend to be
newer.
Age = CL + B.(DWT)-l + E
POWER
Power = CL.
(DWT)9 .E
The regression coefficients and statistics are presented in Table
7.1. The regression coefficients indicate a marked difference
between the data for container ships and the data for the
remaining ships, i.e. the exponent, B , is in excess of unity
for container ships but less than unity for the remaining ship
types. A number of contai,ner ships have been designed to travel
at 25-30 knots and these, having high power, would tend to move
the regression line up, giving it an increasing slope with
deadweight. Given current fuel prices, however, these ships
have not been proving economic at such high speeds. Hence, it
is thought analysis of the container ships currently being
designed may well show a significantly lower exponent for a
regression of power on deadweight.
Power = Q + 6. (DWT) + E
20
superimposed on a plot of the sample data contained
in Figures
46-52. Table 7.2 shows the regression coefficients and
statistics for this model, which is of the form
25474/80--3
21
The sample is small for passenger ships. However, there are a
'number of ships that travel at twenty to twenty-one knots and
these tend to lie just above the regression with speed equal
to twenty knots (Figure 59) .
SPEED
22
practical purposes they may be considered negligible. The
regression for container ships shows a pronounced positive
slope. The data exhibit a distinctly linear relationship between
5000 deadweight tonne ships which travel at fifteen knots and
35 000 deadweight tonne ships which travel at twenty-fiveknots.
For ro-ro ships (see Figure 61) the regression line shows a
positive slope, but the data do not show a steady trend for
larger ships to operate at a higher speed. Rather, there appears
to be a quantum jump at 14 000 deadweight tonnes : ships less
than 14 000 DWT travel at about seventeen knots, while ships
greater than 14 000 DWT travel at about twenty-two knots. Such
irregularities in the data illustrate the need to consider the
plot of the sample in conjunction with the regression
coefficients and statistics in order to obtain a fuller
understanding of the relationship between the two variables.
The regression model for cargo ships (Figure 65) provides only
a broad indication that a positive correlation exists. The data,
in fact, are scattered over a quite wide range of speeds. The
data for passenger ships (Figure 66) shows that most ships in
excess of 1500 deadweight tonnes travel at about twenty knots.
The implication of the regression model, that the larger the
passenger ship the higher will be its operating speed is not,
in fact, true. Notwithstanding this fact, examination of Figure
66 will show that the regression model still provides an
indication of the operating speed that couldbe expected of a
passenger ship of a given deadweight.
23
The confidence intervals for bulk carriers, o,re carriers and
tankers are quite narrow and do not diverge at large values of
deadweight. The confidence intervals for the other ship types
are not encouraging: they are all wide and the passenger ship
confidence limits diverge at extreme values of deadweight.
CONTAINER CAPACITY
TEU = a + B .(DWT) + E ,
An alternative model
TEU = CL .( D W T ).E~
was also regressed and the regression coefficients and statistics
are presented in Table .C.9. The exponent, 6 , resulting from
this regression is very close to unity which reinforces the
hypothesis that thjere is a linear relationship between container
capacity and deadwkight .
24
The confidence interval shows that although the data do show
a direct correlation between the variables, there is still a
degree of scatter about the line of best fit.
25
384.0
376.0
368.0
360.0
352.0
344.0
336.0
328.0
320.0
312.0
304.0
296.0
288.0
280.0
272.0
264.0
256.0
248.0
240.0
232.0
224.0
216.0
208.0
200.0
192.0
184.0
176.0
168.0
160.0
152.0
144.0
136.0
128.0
120.0
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 8 LENGTH VS DEADWEIGHT (TANKERS)
I
a
U
-I
a
Qf
W
31
352.0
344.0
336.0
328.0
320.0
312.0
304.0
296.0
288.0
280.0
272.0
264.0
256.0
248.0
240.0
232.0
224.0
216.0
208.0
200.0
192.0
184.0
176 .“O
168.0
160.0
152.0
144.0
W 136.0
N
128.0
120.0
112.0
104.0
96.0
88.0
80.0
72.0
64.0
56.0
48.0
40.0
32.0
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
---
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL---
FIGURE 13 BREADTH VS DEADWEIGHT (BULK CARRIERS)
48.80
48.00
47.20
46.40
45.60
44.80
44.00
43.20
42.40
41.60
40.80
40.00
39.20
38.40
37.60
36.80
36.00
35.20
34~.40
33.60
32.80
32.00
31.20
30.40
29.60
28.80
28.00
27.20
26.40
25.60
24.80
24.00
23.20
22.40
21.60
20.80
20.00
19.20
18.40
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 16 BREADTH VS DEADWEIGHT (GENERAL CARGO SHIPS)
\
\
\ *
\
' \
I*
**\
.\
l
l
l
\
\
N
39
13.75
13.50
13.25
13.00 4
12.75 /
11.75
11.50
11.25
1 1 .oo
D 10.75
R 10.50
A 10.25
U 10.00
G 9.75
H 9.50
T 9.25
9.00
8.75
8.50
8.25
M 8.00
. 7.75
7.50
7.25
ro 7.00
0 6.75
6.50
6.25
6.00
5.75
5.50
J
5.25
5.00
4.75
4.50
4.25
4.00
3.75
0.0
L 222
22
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
---
9596 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
!
l j
19.20
D 18.80
R 18.40
A 18.00
U 17.60 I
G 17.20 j
H 16.80
16.40 T l
16 .OO
. 15.60-
15.20
14.80
I
n 14.40
~~~ ~
I
14.00
13.60 i
13.20
12.80
12.40
12.00
11.60
11.20
10.80
10.40
10.00
9.60
9.20
8.80
8.40 I
8.00
7.60 I I 1 -
0.0 20.0 60.0
40.0 80.0 100.0 i 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE "
-
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
m
or4
'
" 8
h
Z
2
\ 0
0
N
0
0
0
-
N \
,
0
m
0
1
0
45
18.00
17.60
17.20
16.80
16.40
16.00
15.60
15.20
14.80
14.40
14.00
13.60
13.20
12.80
12.40
12.00
11.60
11.20
10.80
10.40
10.00
9.60
9.20
/
8.80
8.40
8.00
7.60
7.20
6.80
6.40
6.00
5.60
5.20 . .
4.80
4.40
.*
.. /'
/--
4.00
3.60 /
3.20
2.80
/
2.40
2.00
0.
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL "
-
FIGURE 24 DRAUGHT VS DEADWEIGHT (PASSENGER SHIPS)
60000.0
58500.0 t t
4.
57000.0 '2
55500.0
54000.0
52500.0
51000.0
49500.0
48000.0
G 46500.0
R 45000.0
0 43500.0
S 42000.0
S 40500.0
39000.0
R 37500.0
E 36000.0
G 34500.0
I 33000.0
S 31500.0
T 30000.0
E 28500.0
R 27000.0
E 25500.0
D 24000.0
22500.0
T 21000.0
0 19500.0
N 18000.0
S 16500.0
15000.0
13500.0
12000.0
10500.0
9000.0
7500.0
6000.0
4500.0
3000.0
1500.0
0.0
0
- ~ ',l(,
(-1 (I
95%
REGRESSION LINE
CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
2500.0 2 22 3'
2000.0 6
' '
2
I I I I I 1 I I 1
1500.0
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0
DEADWEIGHT '
( 000 TONNES )
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 26 GROSS REGISTEREDTONS VS DEADWEIGHT (RO.R0 SHIPS)
86000.0
84000.0
82000.0
80000.0
78000.0
76000.0
74000.0
72000.0
70000.0
G 68000.0
R 66000.0
0 64000.0
S 62000.0
S 60000.0
58000.0
R 56000.0
E 54000.0
G 52000.0
I 50000.0
S 48000.0
T 46000.0
E 44000.0
R 42000.0
E 40000.0
D 38000.0
T
36000.0
34000.0
: A
0 32000.0
N 30000.0
S 28000.0
26000.0
24000.0
22000.0
*A;
20000.0
18000.0
16000.0
14000.0
12000.0
10000.0
8000.0
6000.0
0.0 15.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 75.0 SO.0 105.0 120.0 135.0 150.0
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95Yo CONFIDENCE "
-
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
G
26400.0
25600.0
24800.0
/
R
0
24000.0
23200.0 /
S
S
22400.0
21600.0 /
20800.0
R 20000.0
E 19200.0
G 18400.0
I 17600.0
S 16800.0
T 16000.0
E 15200.0
R 14400.0
E 13600.0
D 12800.0
12000.0
T 11200.0
W1 0 10400.0
W
N 9600.0
S 8800.0
8000.0
7200.0
6400.0
5600.0
4800.0
4000.0
3200.0
2400.0
1600.0
800.0 *
REGRESSION LINE.
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL "
-
FIGURE 31 GROSS REGISTERED TONSVS DEADWEIGHT (PASSENGER SHIPS)
40000.0
39000.0
38000.0 ..
37000.0
36000.0
35000.0 4.
34000.0
33000.0
32000.0
/
31000.0
30000.0
29000.0
28000.0
27000.0
26000.0
25000-;8-
24000.0
23000.0
22000.0
21000.0
E 20000.0
R 19000.0
E 18000.0
D 17000.0
16000.0
T 15000.0
0 14000.0
N 13000.0
S 12000.0
11000.0
10000.0
9000.0
8000.0
7000.0
6000.0
5000.0
4000.0
3000.0
2000.0-
1000.0
0.0 I 1 I I I I
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
4500.0 p & * ’
3000.0 .
/ 3 /
1500.0
0.0
/I l 1 I 1 1 I I I il
. _ l i
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
55000.0
50000.0
45000.0
40000.0
35000.0
30000.0
25000.0
20000.0
15000.0
10000.0
5000.0
0.0
REGRESSION LINE
---
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
3.50
3.00 2'2 2 * 2 2 3
' L
2.50
2.00 '2 *
REGRESSION LINE
11 .oo 2 3
10.00 2 *
9.00 2
8.00 2 ' .
7 .OO
.2 3
'
3
'
6.00
5.00 .. * *2
*
t
2
t
3
.
4.00 2 * * t .
3.00 tt t
2 * 2
42 2.00 2 22 2
1 .oo 1 I l I I
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0
DEADWEIGHT ('
000 TONNES 1
30.00
29.25
28.50
27.75
27.00
26.25
25.50
24.75
24.00
23.25
22.50
21.75 * *3 2
A 21 $00 3 .
20.25 G .** 3 t
E 19.50
18.75 '
3 *
18.00 ** tt.tt ,
17.25 '223 **
16.60
Y 15.75
E 15.00
A 14.25
R 13.50
S 12.75
12.00
11.25
10.50
9.75
9.00
8.25
7.50
6.75
6.00
5.25
4.50
3.75
3.00
2.25
1.50
0.75 2 * * n -3 I "
0.00 I" - - - I l " 1 -
0.0 15.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 75.0 90.0 105.0 135.0
120.0 150.0
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
4.80
4.00
3.20
0 .0
E 27.00 '2'
t
26.00
25.00
24.00
23
..5*
3'7*2*
.
23.00 442'3'
22.00 * * 6 2 4* *
21 .oo
20.00
5'4'26'2
9.23 6
..
19.00 * 9 '5627
18.00
17 00
~
16.00
m 15.00
UI 14.00
13.00
12.00
11.00 3
10.00 *63 '2 2 2
9.00
8.00
3'2'
'22 * 2.* * 822
23 3*
"5 '5 *
7.00
6.00 "33 * *
2
t .
2'3
. .*
5
2'
.. 2
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1 .00
L
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 450.0 500.0
REGRESSION LINE
11.25 33..
10.63
10.00 444*3'4*'*42223*** t ...
9.38
8.75 669342' 32'3932' *32 ** *22 '2 7' 2
'
8.13 57665529'4522293.5' '
'
4
'
3' 2 2443 *422 2
7.50
6.88 39€%3%7;'*9 *S832 2 3 45'. '2 24 ' 7 **
6.25 *65*354322 232**4.& 2 *22'4' '522 *
5.63
5.00 '3.443' 3 23"'4*3 '
3 '2 5' '
2 - *
4.38
3.75 264 232 2 4' 243.2.4 2 2 3 4
3.13 323*'*425 *4 ** '45 222 +Q" ** 3
2.50
1.88
1.25
*32*2 923322
2 .. t.
3 2 '
4 ''2 '22'
3
'
**
0.63
0.00 I I I I I I I I I
0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 36.0 40.0
DEADWEIGHT ( 000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 46 HORSEPOWER V S DEADWEIGHT (CONTAINER SHIPS)
39000.0
38000.0
37000.0
36000.0
35000.0
34000.0
/ 2
33000.0
32000.0
31000.0
/
30000.0 2*
29000.0
28000.0
H 27000.0
0 26000.0
R 25000.0
S 24000.0
E 23000.0
P 22000.0
0 21000.0
W 20000.0
E 19000.0
R 18000.0
17000.0
16000.0
15000.0
14000.0
13000.0
12000.0
11000.0
10000.0
9000.0
8000.0
7000 .0
6000.0
5000.0
4000.0
3000 10
2000 !0
1000.0
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL "
-
FIGURE 48 HORSEPOWER -VS DEADWEIGHT (BULK CARRIERS)
80440.0
78440.0
76440.0
74440.0
72440.0
70440.0
68440.0
66440.0
64440.0
62440.0
60440.0
58440.0
56440.0
54440.0
n 52440.0
0 50440.0
R 48440 0
I
S 46440.0
E 44440.0
P 42440.0
0 40440.0
W 38440.0
E 36440.0
R 34440.0
32440.0
30440.0 , ‘2
28440.0
26440.0
24440.0
22440.0
20440.0
18440.0
16440.0
14440.0
12440.0 ””-
10440 0
~ /
8440.0 /
6440.0
4440.0
2440.0 . t
440.0 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I
0.0 20.0 60.0
40.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 200.0
180.0
160.0
DEADWEIGHT (’000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
”
-
19500.0
18000.0
16500.0
15000.0
13500.0
12000.0
10500.0
9000.0
7500.0
6000.0
4500.0
3000.0 2
1500.0
0.0 I I I I I I I I 1
REGRESSION LINE
9556 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 50 HORSEPOWER VS DEADWEIGHT (TANKERS)
32000.0
31200.0
30400.0
29600.0
28800.0
28000.0
27200.0
26400.0
25600.0
24800.0
24000.0
23200.0
22400.0
21600.0
H 20800.0
0 20000.0
R 19200.0
S 18400.0
E 17600.0
P 16800.0
0 16000.0
W 15200.0
E 14400.0 / .. /
R 13600.0 I
.
12800.0
12000.0
2 * J 2 /2
11200.0
10400.0
9600.0
8800.0
8000.0 1 .
7200.0
6400.0
5600.0
/-"-
4800.0
4000.0
3200.0
2400.0
1600.0
800.0 "..
0.0 I I 1 I I I I 1 I
0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 36.0 40 .o
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 51 HORSEPOWER VS DEADWEIGHT (GENERAL CARGO SHIPS)
76000.0
74000.0
72000.0
70000.0 /
68000.0
66000.0
64000.0
/
62000.0
60000.0
/
58000.0
56000.0
54000.0
H 52000.0
0 50000.0
R 48000.0
S 46000.0
E 44000.0
P 42000.0
0 40000.0
W 38000.0
E 36000.0
R 34000.0
32000.0
30000.0
/
28000.0
26000.0
24000.0
22000.0
20000.0
18000.0
16000.0
14000.0
12000.0
10000.0
8000.0
6000.0
4000.0
2000.0
0.0 L
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.5 12.0 13.5 15.0
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
0
1
4
* *\\ \ \ l 0
N
3
l 0
l 0
r
0
(
m
N
0
W
0
1
0
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000N
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- O ~ ~ C W D ~ ~ N - O ~ ~ C ~ D ~ ~ N ~ O ~ ~ C W D ~ ~ N - O ~ ~ C W
~ ~ m m m m m m m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - - - - r ( -
76
*\. > \\
L
77
80440.0
78440.0
76440.0
74440.0
72440.0
70440.0
68440.0
66440.0
64440.0 I
62440.0
60440.0
58440.0
56440.0
54440.0
H 52440.0
0
R
50440.0
48440.0
/
/
S 46440.0
E
P
0
W
E
44440.0
42440.0
40440.0
38440.0
36440.0 /
/’
R 34440.0
32440.0
30440.0
28440.0
26440.0
24440.0
22440.0
20440.0
18440.0
l / 3
* 2
* t
16440.0
14440.0 ”
12440.0
10440.0
8440.0 4 w
6440.0 839483’ 5 w
4440.0
2440.0
I
. .I I I I 1 I I
440.0 1
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
4000.0
3200.0
2400.0
1600.0 2999899.9’ **
800.0 8997 1 I
0.0 I I I I I I I
0.0 8.0 4.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 36.0 40.0
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 58 HORSEPOWER VS DEADWEIGHT (GENERAL CARGO SHIPS)
0
0
3
>
l
l t-
CY
W
l
\ * *
l
\ l
\ *
\
\ \
\ *
m \
*
* N\
N
N
81
41.60
40.80
40.00
39.20
38.40
37.60
36.80
36.00
35.20
34.40
33.60 /
32.80 33 **
32.00
31.20
30.40
29.60
28.80
28.00
27.20
26.40
K 25.60
N 24.80
0 24.00
T 23.20
S 22.40
21.60
20.80
20.00
19.20
18.40
17.60
16.80
16 .OO
15.20
14.40
13.60
12.80
243 "4.2 /-
12 .oo
11.20
10.40 1 I I I
I 1 I I I I
9.60 50.0
0 .o 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
DEADWEIGHT ('000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
-
..
' ..
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 62 SPEED VS DEADWEIGHT (BULK CARRIERS)
28.50
27.75
27.00
26.25
25.50
24.75
24.00
23.25
22.50
S 21.75
P 21.00
E 20.25
E 19.50
D 18.75
18.00
17.25
16.50
-
15.75
K
N
0
15.00
14.25
13.50
6’ 266 *3*** 5
2
**9593362’2334
225’5
2 ‘R’*’ ” L -
42 **** 2 **
..2 .
A*
* 2.
I
* t
*‘*.2.
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
0 ” ” 13.50
” “ ” ” ” , “
T 12.75 4533
S 12.00 92’
11.25
10.50
9.75
9.00
8.25
7.50
6.75
6.00
5.25
4.50
3.75
3.00
2.25
1.50
0.75
0.00 I I 1 I I I I I I
0.0 50.0 150.0
100.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 450.0 500.0
DEADWEIGHT (’000 TONNES)
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
0 13.50
T 12.75
S 12.00
11.25 9999'"2 94 * /
10.50 /
9.75 9942.89 * /
9.00 2
8.25
7.50
6.75
6.00
5.25
4.50
3.75
3.00
2.25
1.50
0.75
0.00
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE ---
INTERVAL
-
K *18.00 * *
N 17.50
0 17.00 ** 9
T 16.50
S 16.00
15.50
m 15.00
/
”
m 14.50
14.00
/”
12.00
11.50
/’
11.00
10.50
10.00
9.50
9.00
REGRESSION LINE
95% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ---
FIGURE 66 SPEED VS DEADWEIGHT (PASSENGER SHIPS)
c
W
n
v)
>
>-
89
CHAPTER 4 - CONCLUDING REMARKS
GENERAL
90
with incomplete data have been excluded from the analysis, as
have those ships that operate in more than one fashion, e.g.
general cargo/container ships (see Chapter 2). These facts may
affect the applicability of the results depending on the type
of trade expected at a given port and the accuracy desired of
the estimates of the ship characteristics. However. due to the
comprehensive nature of the information in Lloyd's Register it
is expected that such effects would only be of minor
significance.
Ship a G R2
92
TABLE 2 - BREADTH(^): REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS FOR
MODEL,
B = a. (DWT)B .E
Ship 0 B R2
93
TABLE 3 - DRAUGHT(^): REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS FOR
MODEL.
D = C(.
( D W T ) .E
~
Ship a B R2
Ro- ro 3.94
0.83 0.297
(22.9) (53.3)
Bulk Carrier
0.93 0.275 4.18
(2751 (182)
Tanker
General Cargo
94
TABLE 4 - GROSS REGISTERED TONS: REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND
STATISTICS FOR MODEL,
GRT = a+B .(DWT)+E
Ship Type a B R2
95
TABLE 5 - NET REGISTERED TONS: REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND
STATISTICS FOR MODEL,
NRT = cc+B .(DWT)+E
Ship CL B R2
96
TABLE 6 - AGE: REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS FOR MODEL
AGE = m+a. (DWT)+E
Ship a B R2
97
TABLE 7 .l - HORSEPOWER : REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS
FOR MODEL,
HP = C(.
( D W T ).E~
~
Ship Type C( B R2
98
TABLE 7.2 - HORSE POWER(^) : REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND
STATISTICS FOR MODEL,
HP = a. (DWT)B . (V)y .E
Ship a B Y R2
0.96 Container
2.66 0.526 1.52
(29.4)(20.7)(1.97)
Carrier Ore
0.72 1.74 0.586 12.4
(7.43) (18.5) (4.39)
0.90 Tanker
2.10 0.504 6.70
(14.3) (131) (41.7)
Cargo
General
0.94 2.17 0.539 5.49
(29.7) (115) (90.7)
Passenger 0.289 0.230 3.55 0.76
(6.96) (2.43)
(-0.86) (c)
1 hp = 0.746 kW.
99
TABLE 8 - SPEED(a): REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS FOR
MODE L,
V = a+B. (DWT)+E
Ship a B R2
100
TABLE 9 - C O N T A I N E R C A P A C I T Y ( ~ ) : REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND
STATISTICS FOR MODEL,
TEU = CL+^ .(DWT)+E
Ship CL 6 R2
25474/80---8 101
ANNEX A
T04 Owner
TO 5 Manager
TO 6 F1ag
Port
T11 LR classification
hull symbols
Classification
T12 notation of ship (LR)
T13 Machinery
classification
(LR)
102
T20 Date of build
Shipbuilder and place of build
Yard number
T22 Superstructures
T29 Conversions
103
T3 0 Ship type and sub-types
Propulstion type
Number of screws
Number of passengers
Material of ship
104
T42 Number, material, type, shape and position of
special tanks
106
T75 Turbo-electric engines
Number of steam turbines
Total shaft horsepower
Kilowatt, volts of generators
Shaft horsepower of motors
Type of steam
107
T9 6 Special propellors and speed
Number of special propellors
Type of special propellors
Position of special propellors
Speed
108
ANNEX B
DATA PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
DATAPREP2 reads the data for the first ship from one of the seven
files created by the previous program. It then locates the
'words' (strings of ten characters) that contain the information
on deadweight, gross registered tons, net registered tons,
length, breadth, draught and age. These 'words' are loaded into
the output array, and the ship propulsion type is located and
decoded. It must be decoded because the form of propulsion
determines on which cards the data for power is located. The
'words' containing informtion on container capacity are then
located and loaded into the output array. Next the data on power
are located and decoded. If they are blank the program drops
that ship and reads the information for the next ship. If the
data on power is present it is loaded into the output array.
Finally, the 'word' containing the information on speed is
located and loaded into the output array. The information for
that ship is then output the information for the next ship read
25474180-9 109
in and the process repeated. Therefore, DATAPREP1 produces files
which contain the relevant 'cards' of data for ships of the
relevant types, while DATAPREP2 produces files which contain
the relevant words' of data.
110
sample of ships described in Chapter 2. The regression models
described in this paper generally have one of the following
forms:
The first model simply determines the straight line of best fit
for the data, where a is the intercept on the dependent variable
axis and 8 is the slope of the line. There is an unpredictable
randomness in all data whichis described by the stochastic error
term, E . This term accounts for error from two sources. The
first is the fact that when framing a regression model one does
not claim to have included all the variables which influence
the relationship and so there will be specification error in
the equation. The second source of error is in the measurement
or recording of the data.
log Y = A + B . log X + E,
A A
where
S (yneW) =JMSE (1 X' ( x ~ x ) - ~Ix )
A
Y is the regression estimate of Ynew
t(1- CX) is the t-statistic, and
112
ANNEX C
ALTERNATIVE MODELS:
REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND STATISTICS
TABLE C.l
LENGTH = a+@ .( D W T )+y .(DWT)2 + ~
Ship CL B Y R2
.92 -0.0709
Container 7.65 77.2
(-13.1)
(30.7)(31.7)
Ro-
-0.314
ro 13.6 62.0 0.81
(-4.40)(8.95) (9.44)
113
TABLE C.2
Ship a B Y R2
Carrier
Bulk 16.3 0.313 -0.000965 0.93
(196) (86.9) (-33.5)
Carrier
Ore 15.7 0.349 -0.00109 0.98
(92.7) (51.9) (-24.9)
General
Cargo 10.0 -0.0178 0.87
(217) (-43.5)
114
TABLE C .3
Ship Type a B Y R2
Carrier
Ore 7.56 0.0849 -0.000141 0.97
(117) (33.1) (-8.49)
General
Cargo 3.62 0-552 -0.00974
0.87
(161) (119) (-48.7)
115
T A B L E C.4
GRT = a. (DWT)B .E
Ship a B R2
116
TABLE C.5
NRT = a. (DWT)B .E
Ship a P R2
Tanker
General Cargo
117
T A B L E C.6
AGE = a + ~ .( D W T ) - ~ + E
Ship c( 6 R2
Ship a B R2
Container 0.66
.6840 1800
(-4.77) (25.9)
Ro- ro 0.55
1010 1340
(0.95) (11.4)
Bulk Carrier 5740 161 0.67
(61.3) (70.6)
Ore Carrier 3650 180 0.73
(10.l) (27.l)
Tanker 9610 98.5 0.74
(69.2) (92.8)
General Cargo 0.52
1090 571
(15.1) (66.6)
Passenger 0.415140 2480
(3.02) (5.22)
1 hp = 0.746 kW.
119
TABLE C.8
SPEED = a. (DWT)6 .E
a B R2
TABLE C.9
CONTAINER CAPACITY = a. (DWT)6 .E
Ship a B R2
Container
1.04 43.8
(80.7) (60.3)
120
FIGURES 4-67
121