There is no general agreement about the historical origin of
mankind concern with quality. Some consider the guilds and master craftsmen of Europe's Middle Ages as the first 'organized' forms of quality management, although there is ample historical evidence that quality mattered in older civilizations. The history of quality is in fact a complicated one: whereas logic would suggest a sustained interest in the search for quality by all civilizations and epochs, the Industrial Revolution and the two World Wars led to an 'accident of history', a two hundred year-long era where maintaining quality became a delicate matter for organisations. What we know is that at the end of the Second World War, industrial companies did not shy away from the fact that quality was a secondary concern. In its own history, the Toyota Motor Corporation acknowledges that the quality of its trucks was so poor that the show vehicles would often break down on their way to car exhibitions. In the 1950s, Citroen was also well aware of the problems and breakdowns that plagued its newly released models. In a post-war reconstruction economy supply can undershoot demand and, thus, customers cannot afford to be too 'picky'. This state of affairs changed in the late 1970s when US manufacturers found themselves at a growing competitive disadvantage when their products were compared to Japanese imports. Europe should have suffered the same fate, but the shock of competition on quality was attenuated by protectionist policies. In the USA this quality challenge led to a response, which has often been called the 'quality revolution'. This response resulted in the development, growth and adoption of quality management practices. In the industrialized world, the days of thinking of quality as a marginal and secondary concern are long gone. Quality is recognized in most contexts as a key competitive dimension and organisations need the capability to manage their performance along this dimension. However there are still economies today where, due to various reasons (shortageof goods, lack of knowledge, thriving opportunism, etc.), the quality revolution has not taken place yet.