Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Discovering a genuine
aviation for passionates
From left to right: Lucette Razon, Alain Battisti, Marcel Jurca, Patrick Quiertant,
Gilles Aubin, Francis Heindryckx, Pascal Vigneron.
First row: Didier Razon, Arnaud Gruet, Jean-Pierre Gruet.
JAF 99
Jurca aircraft in 2020
The most assiduous among you will recognize the description files already
made available from the Federation RSA in France, the newcomers will
discover the result of about fifty years of design and exchanges with
homebuilders around the world.
The novelties of this second edition concern the first flight of a MJ-51C
Sperocco in the USA, the first flight of a MJ-10 in the UK, a new MJ- Marcel Jurca (1923-2001)
10 under construction near Rodez in France, some pictures of ongoing Here in 1973.
projects and airplanes back to flight, and also the explanation article
written for the French press by Marcel in 1960. You will also discover the Summary
new Marcel Jurca archive room and I’ve made the English version of this
booklet your are reading (feel free to email me if you find weird stuff). 3 Jurca aircraft in 2020
4 1996 interview
By joining the Jurca Air Force (JAF), you are becoming part a group of
enthusiasts who love to fly their own way, and practice a « fighter type » 8 Jurca’s explanations in 1960
aviation, serious, but without taking themselves seriously. 10 Marcel Jurca’s new archive room
12 The MJ-2 Tempête
We also recommend you to become a member of your national
46 The MJ-5 Sirocco
homebuilders’ association, in order to be in touch with an irreplaceable
network of skills and to have access to numerous documentations and 80 The MJ-51 Spérocco
gatherings throughout the year. 82 The MJ-53 Autan
88 The MJ-77 Gnatsum P51 3/4
We hope that this information will allow you to find the Jurca of your
92 The MJ-8 FW190 3/4
dreams in the best conditions and to make your project come true.
94 The MJ-80 FW190 1/1
Happy building and flying! 98 The MJ-10 Spitfire 3/4
Patrick Cottereau 104 The MJ-100 Spitfire 1/1
Aircraft homebuilder
& CMJ volunteer 108 Unavailable & restricted drawings
Located in France, Paris area 115 Building License
webmaster@marcel-jurca.com
116 My builders’ contacts
v1 117 How to read the files & La bécane
73 years is the age of Marcel Jurca, aircraft designer since his 25th spring and “the heap of
aircraft design tricks” is some 1,200 layers related to the construction of 27 different aircraft,
from the proto «trainer» of 1951 to the project of the full scale Mustang he is working on.
Jurca here he is, the man is tall, has presence and expresses himself with an accent that could
be described as rocky, with a pronunciation that annoys the RRRRs and that only reinforces his
speech and his frankness. But behind the man there is a work, a gigantic work with aircraft
known to all like the MJ-2 Tempête and the MJ-5 Sirocco, with others, totally unknown, such as
the Crivats twin-engine, the light Zephyr or the metallic Bise. And then there are the last ones:
the MJ-22 Bi-Tempête and the MJ-23 Orage.
Whether known or not, his planes have a number of things in common. Most of them are not
“beautiful” -in the canonical sense of the term- but have an incredible face-close-up look in an
Ennio Morricone movie. So look at a Sirocco with its shark’s tail fin in a low passage; If that day
the pilot knows how to do it and you have a sunset in the background...
And then, all of them match with a certain idea of the way to fly, of the kind of aircraft and
the pleasure of true piloting.
So, to better understand all of this, we went to see the wolf in his den, in Chenevières, to ask
him a few questions. I won’t hide the fact that it annoyed him a little at first because he knows
he still has too much work and no time to lose, and then the naturalness regained the upper
hand as he loves to share his unquenchable passion for the air.
Arnaud GRUET
Well for me the fighter, it represents In fact, I never did dual controls since
Here in Nangis, 1996.
the Aircraft by definition, with a capi- I started with the Grunau 9, a glider
tal A because when I opened my eyes where you sit alone on a beam and I
in life, there were above my head only continued to fly single-seaters
only fighters, which were not making even during the war on the Henschel
war because it was out of the war 129, a twin-engine single-seater. Two
but they were fighters, Polish Pezetel engines but only one stick, in the mid-
that I ended up flying at the fighter dle, and not a “horned stick”.
school. With their star-shaped engine
they had a very characteristic sound As soon as the war was over, as I had
MJ: I’m 73 years old and the average that made me jump out of bed. no plane anymore, I drew my “Jur-
life is around that, so I hurry, hurry, mar” which never flew.
hurry to finish, to finish with the Mus- For me, I couldn’t design a multi-seat-
tang, to make a whole. er plane, it didn’t interest me, too I had made too many design mistakes.
big. Even today I still like a 747, but So to learn I bought a set of plans of
But it’s funny because when you’re at it doesn’t make me vibrate, whereas Jodel D112 and built mine by ask-
that age and you think about the in- a spit that passes with a bit of rudder ing myself lots and lots of questions
evitable disappearance and you say in the sky, that makes me vibrate. about every detail. Once I thought
to yourself, well, at least I say to my-
self, I’ll always live because I leave
so much junk in papers, a bunch of
stuff from plane plans that in a long
time people will still talk about me
as if I were there...
MJ-100 prototype
calculation framework valid for all my And all the barriers were lifted... ESTACA really got me out of a rut.
planes. I’ve always been a kind of five-legged
My big chance was finding ESTACA. sheep...
At the same time, I got in touch with For six years now, I have been spend-
the ESTACA engineering school and ing one or two days a week with the Because when I brought out the
three students started to prepare students and I have given them every Tempête with 65 hp in 1956 I was told
their final thesis on the Autan, the possible and imaginable problem, all that I was crazy, that we were flying
full scale and the 3/4 Spitfire. my planes have passed back and forth two people with 65 hp on a Piper Cub.
in their hands. I told them that the Piper had 20 m²
But I didn’t know the school and I and that I only had 8 and then there
didn’t really believe in it. So I accel- And then there’s the way I present were the MJ-7s and 77 single-seaters
erated with Guillaume and he deliv- myself to all these young people. with 240 hp: with the DGAC it was:
ered the MJ-8, 9 and 10, the MJ-12 They’ve understood that their thesis “no, nope, yes, no...”.
and the MJ-77. at the end of the year is not going in
the garbage but that it will fly, that And today 800 hp on the Spit, no prob-
When he gave me this, 2 or 3 days lat- it’s serious, that there’s meat in it, lem, so the regulations had changed
er, ESTACA called me and said: “come and they see things differently. thanks to all this.
and get your calculation files”!
They get very good grades because Today (1996) you present us with
The people at the DGAC, who didn’t they apply themselves to it and the Orage that we could call Super
think I was capable of getting these they’re passionate about it. I don’t Tempête and the MJ-22 Bi-Tempête.
calculation files out, were very sur- leave them until everything has been So, back to your first love by leaving
prised when I put the 15 kg of paper searched, and now the “top notch” the precise historical references and
on their desk: they didn’t believe it. choose my projects. Guillaume and turning to a more playful series of air-
planes?
The Tempête builders started to want Well there are no amateur build regu-
to install 150, 180 and then 200 hp, lation in Romania and with the plans,
which poses some problems on the I gave them the French regulation so
structure that was not originally in- that they can see what can be done
tended for that. there.
So because there was a demand and It’s true that sometimes I feel a bit
people are looking for speed and pow- like a Frenchman in London during the
er I designed the Orage to meet those war, so from here I see what I can do.
needs.
The Jurca Air Force was born from
The construction is very simple and the common passion that some man-
the motorization is not a problem ufacturers have for your aircraft. Did
Find the original soundtrack of this interview on www.marcel-jurca.com. Translation from French by PC, 2020.
What are my aeronautical qualifica- the finesse of the aircraft (this is the Try to imagine the work involved in
tions? I answer: officially, none, ex- “Tempête”) by choosing a rectangular making a cap with a dihedral, where
cept one, tacitly granted: that of am- wing and at the same time, I thought you need a mold for each cap, espe-
ateur builder. I have often been asked that one and the same rib everywhere cially if you are dealing with an airfoil
if I am a graduate engineer: no, I am a would lead to a reduction in the cost with an evolving profile that tapers at
simple self-taught person. I started at price of manufacturing by leading to the end. (Obviously, you can’t think
the age of 7 by making scale models, the realization of a single mold: And for a moment about bending a piece
prototypes of my own design, which if we talk about ribs, I must take my of wood like the upper sole of the
most of the time “tried to fly” rath- hat off to Mrs. Joly and Delemontez, “Tempête” which is “200 X 50 mm”).
er than flew,.... Then it was gliding who taught me how to make a simple
school and motor flying. And so, with rib - see D11 - and showed me that I could have taken the solution of Mis-
the help of aerodynamics courses, I assembly joins can be oversimplified. ter Mignet, the father of the “Flying
trained on my own, loving my “hob- Flea”, who stretched a rope between
by”, aviation, with one desire that is In this rib, I note the joints of the the ends of the spar to be bent, until
still alive today: to fly with my own spacers which do not have any bevel he obtained the famous dihedral. But
wings on an airplane I designed my- cut (and this is normal because, ba- I didn’t need a dihedral, so I stayed
self, a very small airplane that I could sically, the gluing of the wood at the as flat as the table on which I take
use as one uses a bicycle... without end has no value and in the afore- my meals. Curiosity helped, so I made
having to continually resort to a club mentioned case, it transmits all the this spar without a dihedral and I must
whose chief pilot would authorize or efforts as well by the lateral plywood admit that the first time I took to the
not my flights according to availabil- strips as by a bevel cut at the end of air, I wondered what would happen,
ity. I wanted to free myself from the another strip having another bevel so much so that I was influenced by
“club” servitude and paid flight hours cut). many friends who considered the di-
at a price far beyond my means. hedral to be absolutely imperative on
These cuts are made with the help of a low wing monoplane. I finished the
Thus, by drawing on course books angle protractors and cut-to-length wing in 80 hours of work, 40 of which
and listening to “real” engineers talk fixtures, which must be extremely were for the spar.
about their “business”, I understood - precise... enough to bore even the
not having the material time to study most ardent user. Another frequently asked question:
at a major school - the key points that “Why a rectangular wing? »
go into the design of a light aircraft. So I adopted these ribs with the ap-
Moreover, I have since realized that proval of the Jodel team on the Well, again thanks to those damned
being an engineer does not give you “Tempête”, and I flatter myself that clever trapezoidal wing complexes,
the right to be automatically classi- I chose them... and there are only 7 evolutionary, with or without swept...
fied as “ingenious”... and that being on each side. All I wanted to do was flying. To be
“ingenious” cannot be learned at in the air was my one desire, with a
school... Then there is the dihedral of the wing healthy plane. So I avoided becoming
which, on the “Tempête”, is... non- a “scientist” by adopting a “Spitfire”,
So first I got rid of a bunch of prej- existent. Why is that? Because, first “Morane” or “Messerschmitt” wing
udices and complex aerodynamics of all, I wanted an acrobatic plane that could have given me stories of
learned with which, to gain a hun- and, at the same time, I was “broke” stalls due to vortices generated by
dredth on performance, you can man- enough not to think of a dihedral au- more or less elliptical shapes, and
age to build... a gas plant. For ex- tomatically requiring more expensive whose profiles are known at the root
ample, I preferred to lose slightly on glue strip spars. and tip, but whose polar is an eternal
Access by car:
Access by train:
Access by airplane:
HERE!
The aircraft met a set of specifications that Marcel had set for himself:
« When I designed the Tempête, I wanted to make a airplane that was
easy to build, not dangerous in flight, that could be used for aerobatics
and whose flying would be close, all things considered, to a fighter of
the 2nd World War, that I had the opportunity to fly in 1943 and 1944
when, as a young fighter pilot, I served in the Royal Romanian Air Force,
Romania being my country of birth ».
MJ-2 “Te
empête”
Photo Vigneron family
MJ-2 Tempête
MJ-2 Tempête in 1956, the origin of a passion
In 1956,
the first Tempête took
off and started the saga
of the
Jurca aircraft...
Disclaimer: This document is for information purposes only. In spite of all the care taken in the search for information and their verification, the elements presented cannot in any case
engage the responsibility of the Marcel Jurca Committee. The choice to build an aircraft remains the exclusive appreciation of the builder. Readers are encouraged to point out possible
errors or additional information to improve the document in its future versions.
Seat 1 Flying: 3
Lenght 5,7 m Isolation: 3
Height 2,4 m Budget: 20-30 K€
Span 6,0 m
Wing area 8,0 m2 Regulation: >51%
Use: Balade Aerobatics
Wing chord 1,40 m
Available in: Plans No kit
Airfoil NACA 23012
Plans’ price: 380 €*
Balance range 16% à 32% (+/-3%)
Construction: Wood
Horizontal stabilizator span 2,5 m
Duration: <2500h
Horizontal stabilizator area 2,0 m2
First flight: 1956 Built: >60
Main gear spacing 2,3 m
Country: France *excl. postal fees
Empty weight <500 kg
Max weight Normal / Aerobatics 500-550 / 480-520 kg Difficulty:
Power (hp) 65 to 85 90 100 105 115 118 125 135/140 150 160
at sea level
Ceilling (ft) 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+ 15 000+
Roll take off (m) 350 250 - 350 350 - - 350 350
Finesse >7 7,4 (100km/h) >7 >7 >7 >7 >7 >7 >7
Important note : Each aircraft is unique and its performance may vary depending on its propeller, cowls, landing gear, finish and accessories located in the relative wind. The performances indicated
above are thus provided only as an indication and could not engage the Marcel Jurca Committee. The drawings are sold exclusively by the Marcel Jurca Committee and include a license fee to
build only a single aircraft.
and covering
The working skin of the spar consists The aileron has oblique ribs which,
of 5 mm okoume plywood on the front together with the front box, ensure
and rear sides of the rectangle, taper- its torsional rigidity.
ing to 2.5 mm at the ends in succes-
sive finger-joints. The tops and bot- Fixed gear attachment
reinforced area
Wing-fuselage wedding
covering
he Tempête is a plane of simple
design, very similar to the Jodel.
It also received its CDN in France. The width of the cab is 0.8 m (0.63 m
at the shoulders) and the entrance
Structure passage is widened by means of a side
door. Its total length is 1.75 m.
Its fuselage is made up of two flanks,
built separately flat, and each com- The front fuel tank is 65 liters, made
fuselage
2 mm and 3.2 mm Okoume plywood. rear tank can be mounted behind the
pilots seat, under the luggage area,
These flanks are built on the same adding 35 liters.
table as the wing and are then as-
sembled around five frames: firewall, The seat can accommodate a para-
wing-to-fuselage junction, seat back, chute for aerobatics. A modification is
tailwheel support and stern. provided for tall pilots, up to 1.93 m.
The turtle back of the fuselage is The panel is fixed at the wing-fuse-
Panel support
made of 1.6 mm plywood rolled on 10 lage junction and receives the instru-
mm plywood hollowed arches. ments. The upper part is mounted on
Silent Blocks, the lower part is left to
The fuselage is attached to the wing the builder’s decision.
by two bolts passing through the spar
at the main ribs and by two external Finishing
fasteners connected to the trailing
edge at the main ribs. The fuselage is fitted with external
side rods to produce a “curve” with
up the fuselage
it.
The windshield is made of 3 to 4 mm
Plexiglas or Lexan®, hot-molded on a You can either make cowlings to your
simple rolled aluminum sheet. It is own taste, or borrow molds from oth-
fixed on a 17x20 mm steel roll bar. er builders.
Wing-fuselage assy
rehearsal
Rudder
Horizontal stabilizer
Hinges
Main gear
Tail wheel
Trim
Instrument panel
Seat belt
Seat
Ventilation system
Engine mount
Cowlings
Propeller
Type MJ-2E - Serial: 96 - F-PJOE - 1997 - Builder: Didier Razon (Tempête #01 F-PHOE replica) (France)
Type MJ-2D - Serial: 13 - F-PPZB - 1968 & 1996 - Builder: André Philippe (France)
Type MJ-2D - Serial: 26 - F-PPPP - 1969 & 1990 - Builder: ACB Tarbes (France)
Type MJ-2D - Serial: 20 - F-PMXO - 1965 - Builder: Marc Van Laer (France). Here with Marcel Jurca in 1968.
Type MJ-2D - Serial: 49 - F-PYHK - 1980 - Builder: Guy Boulard & Alain Oswald (France)
Type MJ-2P - Serial: 116 - F-PCHK - Builder: Christophe “Flying tenor” Smigetska (France)
MJ-5 “S
Sirocco”
Photo Jacques Guilem
MJ-5 Sirocco in 1962, to share the passion
MJ-5 Sirocco
The prototype “Sirocco” at Persan in the mid-seventies after being rebuilt with 180 hp
Les Cahiers du RSA 177, June 1991 EAA Sport Aviation, July 1968 EAA Sport Aviation, May 1966
Disclaimer: This document is for information purposes only. In spite of all the care taken in the search for information and their verification, the elements presented cannot in any case
engage the responsibility of the Marcel Jurca Committee. The choice to build an aircraft remains the exclusive appreciation of the builder. Readers are encouraged to point out possible
errors or additional information to improve the document in its future versions.
Power (hp) 115 125-135 140 145 150 160 165 180 200 220
Cruising speed (km/h) Versions not recommended 220 210 - 260 280 -
75 % power at 3000 ft
because the trend is
Fuel flow at 75% (l/h) 30 35 - 36 40 -
VNE (km/h) (instruments, accessories, 285 295 295 320 335 335
VNO (km/h) retractable gear, general 250 255 255 270 280 280
Vertical speed (ft/min) comfort...) and pilots! 1 500 1500 - 2000 2500 -
Important note : Each aircraft is unique and its performance may vary depending on its propeller, cowls, landing gear, finish and accessories located in the relative wind. The performances indicated
above are thus provided only as an indication and could not engage the Marcel Jurca Committee. The drawings are sold exclusively by the Marcel Jurca Committee and include a license fee to
build only a single aircraft.
Important note: Follow your drawings scrupulously, and if you think you’ve found an interesting modification, get the agreement of the CMJ first.
Firewall
craft, a tandem evolution of the wing-to-fuselage junction and re-
MJ2 Tempête, with a construction ceives the instruments. The upper
very comparable to the Jodel. A side- part is mounted on Silent Blocks, the
by-side tandem version is also avail- lower part is left to the builder’s dis-
able, the MJ-53 “Autan”. cretion, as is the rear panel.
Inverted fuselage
Plexiglas or Lexan®, hot-molded on
a simple rolled aluminum sheet. It is
fixed on a 17x20 mm roll bar. Finishing
The drop-down canopy slides back- The fuselage is equipped with side
wards by rolling on six Rilsan® rollers, rods to produce a “curve” with the
joined together in pairs and guided in 2000 kg Dacron® fabric covering it. The
duralumin “C” profiles, bolted on the positioning of these rods is different if
fuselage. It consists of a duralumin the large (optional) wing-to-fuselage
flanks
turned back-front).
Cockpit
Side view of a Sirocco MJ5-G2 (150 hp retractable landing gear) equipped with a 7 cm propeller spacer allowing to refine the cowling.
Rudder
Hinges
In its retractable version, the main The wheels, equipped with 420x150 or
landing gear consists of two sin- 380x150 tires, are fitted with brakes,
gle-legged gears, each actuated by a according to the builder’s choice. Alu-
25CD4S steel tube self-breaking link- minum sheet metal “trousers” com-
age. plete the set to ensure the closing of
the housing when the landing gear is
The leg is made of a 1.5 mm sheet retracted.
metal, rolled into a “torpedo” shape,
containing the two alpax weights used Tailwheel
to guide the vertical spindles made
of 50 mm 25CD4S steel tube. One of The tailwheel is mounted on five
the weights is attached with the fixed spring steel blades. The most com-
part, the other with the vertical spin- monly used model is the Scott 3200,
dle. also used on the Jodel D140 “Mousque-
Faired wheels
taire” or the Piper “Super Cub”.
The shock absorber is made up of nine
“Weidert” washers type A4 ensuring The retractable tailwhel is available
130 mm of travel, and housed in the as a “specifics” from the 900 part of
leg. the drawings.
Hydraulic actuator
On the side of the leg, and at the top
of it, there is the control pin which
is connected to the connecting rod
(adjustable on the ground) from 1 to
2°. It is maintained beyond “neutral”
when the gear is extended, by a con-
stant pressure provided by an alumi-
num wedge. In this position, the leg is
locked automatically.
Fixed gear
Trim
Instrument panel
Seat belts
Seats
Ventilation
Cockpit view from front left side
Engine mount
Propeller
Lycoming O-320 with baffles
Dynafocal mount
Longitudinal control The elevator control has a trim tab • In straight flight at n~1 g,
mounted on the trailing edge and in-
At any airspeed close to the stall side the right elevator. • When turning at 30° of lateral in-
speed, with or without engine power, clination,
the aircraft can still be given suffi- Control is by means of a small lever
cient nose-down movement to re- located on the left side of the fuse- • Climbing on a steep incline.
turn to Vx or 1.5 Vs with satisfactory lage, ideally located near the throt-
speed. tle. The trim, in electric version, will Overall, the following behavior was
be ideally controlled from the switch- observed:
The application of take-off pow- es of an ergonomic stick.
er from a reduced throttle balance • Regardless of the balance and con-
around 1.5 Vs, results in a very low Remember, however, that the full figuration, the elevator always al-
nose-up torque requiring practically nose-up travel is not sufficient to en- lows you to reach the stall.
no effort to maintain speed (1.5 Vs = sure a full landing in case the elevator
150 km/h, speed for reduced throt- control fails. • The efforts remain low until the
tle). dive, but always in the correct di-
The rudder has a fixed tab, as well as rection. When moving, the control
The possibility of landing at elevator the aileron, if applicable. stick retraction is more sensitive
trim has been studied. The conditions to the immediate approach of the
for a landing can be achieved and the Longitudinal stability stall.
aircraft can be brought to a vertical
speed of zero descent. However, the It was checked at 24.5 and 33 per • Warning signs are practically
step obtained in these conditions re- cent of the balance in each of the non-existent. A visual or audible
quires full nose-up elevator trim trav- recommended configurations. alarm is recommended.
el and therefore limits any “defense”
on the flare. • Climb at W~75% around an equilib- • The loss of control is characterized
rium at 1.4 Vs by a moderate low frequency buf-
Lateral control feting, accompanied by brief roll
and yaw control • Cruise at W~75% from level equi- breakaways that are very well con-
librium trolled by the ailerons.
At first glance, the roll is certainly,
although acceptable, the worst of the • Approach at W required to main- • If you insist until, in some cases,
three control surfaces. Its efficiency, tain a 3° glide slope around 1.5 Vs. you bring the elevator to the rear
sufficient in normal use, is much more stop, cross control is always as-
marginal in aerobatics and is accom- The stress slopes are low, making the sured (ailerons and rudder).
panied by significant efforts beyond elevator quite light and especially not
180 km/h. very homogeneous with the roll. • The engine power does not change
this behavior very much, but later-
But it should be noted that this is a Checked in the same configurations, al control is a little more delicate
particularity wanted by Marcel Jur- the sinusoids are fairly well damped when you want to insist on stalling.
ca because it is a training aircraft (periods of 23 to 25 seconds). This behavior is very healthy and
which was thus automatically limited just by releasing the pressure on
to perform acrobatic figures that do Yaw and roll stability the control column the stall symp-
not cause unnecessary fatigue of the toms disappear instantly.
airframe. Yaw stability is strongly positive. It is
even a little excessive at high speeds, • In a turn, you will find the roll
On the other hand, in a failed recov- which creates a kind of dry and un- breakaways that you always con-
ery, the aileron remains effective pleasant “snaking”. trol with the ailerons alone. Buf-
even at 30 km/h. feting is still a symptom of a stall
Roll stability is, on the other hand, nil and not a warning sign.
The rudder is highly effective, even in any configuration and sometimes
overpowering in normal use, where even slightly negative in strong skids. • Finally, on a steep climb, the loss
the control is very sensitive. In aer- of control is accompanied by a
obatics, this feature is highly appre- good longitudinal surge that is
ciated. quite slow and practically no roll.
During the stall, the elevator can
Type MJ-5 K2 - Serial: 01 - F-PJSX - 1962 & 1976 - Builder: Marcel Jurca then Lucien Cottereau (France)
Type MJ-5 G2 - Serial: 17 - F-POIL - 1967 & 1996 - Builder: Lucien, Serge & Guy then Patrick Cottereau (France)
Type MJ-5 G2 - Serial: 71 - ZK-FNQ - 1991 & 2009 - Builder: Wylie Evans then Philip H Meredith (NZ)
Type MJ-5 L2 - Serial: 96 - F-PYYD puis G-RECO - 1987 - Builder: Jean-Yves Guillou (France)
Type MJ-5 K2 (Ford V8) - Serial: 189 - C-FLAK - 1995 - Builder: Al Knudsen (Canada)
Type MJ-5 H2 - Serial: 113 - N3LM puis N37LM - 1971 - Builder: Lowell Manary (USA)
Type MJ-5 G1 - Serial: 192 - CF-QZI - 1971 - Builder: David C. King (Canada)
Type MJ-5 G1 - Serial: 104 - I-RUMM - 1978 - Builder: Udenio Rusconi (Italia)
Presentation Specifications
T he MJ-51 “Spérocco” was designed in
1969 by Marcel Jurca as an evolution
of the MJ-5 “Sirocco”. Its name means
The third model was started in 1999 near
Orleans, in France, and modified to add a
260 hp Potez in-line engine. The project
Form factor:
Formula:
Seats:
Low wing
Tandem two seater
Wing span: 7,67 m to 8,30 m (extended tips)
Sirocco Special. The result is in fact very was taken up again in 2011 and deeply
Wing area: 10,3 to 11 m2
different because the fuselage is evolu- modified to return to the “standard” Ly- Average chord: 1,40 m to 1,32 m
Lowell Manary’s MJ51C #02US. (photo builder)
tionary instead of having parallel sides, the coming IO-540 300 hp engine. The top of Airfoil: Habib 64000 748 (eq. NACA 747A415)
trapezoidal wing from the MJ-7 “Mustang” the fuselage has been completely rebuilt Longueur fuselage: 7,20 to 7,50 m
2/3 (minus the dihedral) replaces the rect- to widen the passenger seat and have two Cabin width: 60 cm front & 54 cm rear
angular wing and the bubble canopy is now canopies separated by a carbon arch. The Stabilizator span: 3,20 m
extended by the fuselage. front canopy is now of the forward tilting Empty weight: 800-850 kg (estimated)
Luggage weight: 20 kg
type and the passenger canopy is raise/
Max weight: 1100 kg (estimated)
The prototype in version MJ-51B 200 hp lower, both of which are electrically actu- Wing load: 100 kg/m2
was started in Nangis by Serge Brillant at ated. The luggage compartment is made G load factor: +8/-6 G à 1000 kg
the beginning of the Seventies. The air- accessible from the outside and an MJ2 Landing gear: Conventional, fixed or retractable
frame is still visible but has not been com- “Tempête” type access door has been add-
pleted. Its particularity lies in its great ca- ed for passenger to the rear seat. The wing Powertrain:
pacity to carry fuel in the wings as well as tanks are structural and two tanks were Engine type : Lycoming
Power: 200 to 300 hp
the possibility to mount tanks at the wing- added in the retractable landing gear apex-
Fuel type: 100 LL
tips. The canopy is of the “Fouga Magister” es. The wing tips have been redesigned to Propeller: Metal variable pitch / constant speed
type, in two parts that tilt backwards. The increase aspect ratio, decrease drag and to Fuel capacity: 80 liters front / 70-130 liters wings
project is for sale (2020) receive LED headlights and strobes. The
rear of the fuselage was brought back to Complementary: Retractable tailwheel, electrical canopies,
A second reinforced version for 260-300 hp, standard with a Scott 3200 tailwheel. The Extended wing tips, reinforced spar up to +8/-8 G. Standard
the MJ-51C, was designed in 1991 and its floor has also been rebuilt. version standard 200 hp and reinforced / enlarged 260-300 hp
construction started in 1994 in the United
States by the builder of a Jurca MJ-5 Siroc- These three airplanes each have their own
co. Its machine was put into flight in July particularities, especially the canopy, tanks
2019. The four wing tanks are structural and cowling.
and located behind the spar. Its engine is
a Lycoming IO-540 of 260 hp modified to The drawings are available from the Marcel
provide 285 hp. Its canopy is of the recoiling Jurca Committee, which safeguards and
bubble type with a fixed windscreen, quite promotes the work of Marcel Jurca. The
close to the drawings. The tailwheel is re- modifications of the French MJ-51C version
tractable. are also available with plans or molds (cowl-
ing, canopies, removable edges, tanks...).
These data are provided for information purposes only and, as such, cannot engage the Marcel Jurca Committee for any recourse whatsoever. Do not hesitate to report possible errors
or evolutions, directly on www.marcel-jurca.com. All product names or brands mentioned in this document are registered trademarks of their respective owners. These sheets have
been designed for the Federation RSA www.rsafrance.com.
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 4 Engine: Lycoming O-360 Lycoming IO-540-L1B5
Power: 200 hp at 2750 tr/min 300 hp at 2750 tr/min
Complexity: 4
Propeller: Metal variable pitch Hartzell constant speed
Flying: 4
Performances:
Isolation: 3 Max speed at Z=0: 300 km/h 380 km/h
Cruising speed at 75%: 260 km/h 350 km/h
Budget: 50-80 K€ VNE : 400 km/h 450 km/h
Stall speed straight (flaps): 105 (90) km/h 110 (95) km/h
Roll take off (grass): NC NC
Regulation: >51% Take off over 15 m: <500 m <500 m
Roll landing (grass): NC NC
Use: Travelling Aerobatics Vertical speed at Z=0: 2000 ft/min 3000 ft/min
Fuel flow: 40 l/h 55-60 l/h
Available in: Plans No kit Max distance: 800 km 1000 km
Plans’ price: 550 €*
Construction: Wood Particularity: Retractable gear, 140 liters Retractable gear, 210 liters
Designer’s data Reinforced version
Duration: >3500 h (estimated) Designer’s data (estimated)
French Spérocco #02FR under construction at Les Mureaux (LFXU). (photo PC)
Presentation Specifications
S ide-by-side version of the MJ-5 The main use is cross country, with a Form factor:
Formula: Low wing
Sirocco, the MJ-53 Autan takes retractable train, or aerobatics, prefer-
Seats: Side-by-side two seater
One of the two prototypes of the MJ-53 built by Messrs
over the fuselage profile and its large ably with the lighter fixed gear. Wing span: 7,60 m
rudder, but receives a brand new trap- Wing area: 12.21 m2
Richaud and Mélani in 1992. (Photo Jean-Louis)
ezoidal wing. Fighter pilot during the WW2, prefer- Average chord: 1.60 m
Airfoil: NACA 23012
ring the single-seater and the tandem Longueur fuselage: 6.70 m
The two prototypes, equipped with 180 tandems, Marcel Jurca was reluctant Cabin width: 118 cm
hp Lycoming engines, made their first to develop this version, but the request Stabilizator span: 3.26 m
Empty weight: 690 kg
flights in 1992, built by Messrs Richaud of his friends builders of Sirocco finally
Luggage weight: 50 kg
and Mélani at Salon de Provence convinced him. The quality of realiza- Max weight: 960 kg
(south of France). tion did the rest and the Autan proudly Wing load: 79 kg/m2
holds its place in the “civilian” catalog G load factor: +6/-4 G
Landing gear: Conventional, fixed or retractable
The main feature is the incredible of Jurca Aircraft.
width at the shoulders of this “Cadil- Powertrain:
lac”, 118 cm. In 1998, he even started the study Engine type : Lycoming O-320, O-360
Power: 160 to 200 hp
of a four-seater version of the Autan,
Fuel type: 100 LL
The manual retractable landing gear which he then named MJ58 and which Propeller: Metal variable pitch / constant speed
has an additional electric motor which he had calculated by ESTACA (engi- Fuel capacity: 240 liters (80 front / 80 wings / 80 rear)
is not part of the plans, but can be cop- neering school of Levallois Perret near
Complementary: Retractable gear (manual, electrical,
ied from one of the two Autan flying in Paris). He didn’t have time to start this hydraulic), possible tip tanks.
France. It is also possible to mount a project, since he was very busy with
hydraulic retraction system, but with the MJ-70 full scale P51 Mustang,
an increase of the empty weight. which he didn’t have the opportunity to
finish either.
Molds for the cowling and canopies ex-
ist, they will save time for future build-
ers. Note that a spare canopy exist.
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 3 Engine: Lycoming O-360
Power: 180 hp at 2750 tr/min
Complexity: 2
Propeller: Wood fixed pitch
Flying: 3
Performances:
Isolation: 3 Max speed at Z=0: NC
Cruising speed at 75%: 240 km/h
Budget: 40-50 K€ VNE : 350 km/h
Stall speed straight (flaps): 104 (96) km/h
Roll take off (grass): 250 m
Take off over 15 m: 400 m
Regulation: >51%
Roll landing (grass): 300 m
Use: Travelling Voltige Vertical speed at Z=0: 1200 ft/min
Fuel flow: 36 l/h
Available in: Plans No kit Max distance: 1400 km
Plans’ price: 550 €*
Construction: Wood Particularity: Builder’s data
Max weight
Duration: <1000 h <2500 h <3500 h >3500 h
First flight: 1992 Built: 2
Country: France *excl. postal fees
Rear view with the trapezoidal wing to be compared with the Complete panel (photo PC) Electric retractable undercarriage with an emergency
rectangular wing of the MJ-5 Sirocco on left. (photo PC) crank in the cabin (photo PC)
Presentation Specifications
R equiring great building experience, the
MJ-77 is a 75% replica of the famous
North American P51 Mustang. The MJ-77
The wooden wing is trapezoidal with a
single spar, with dihedral and evolutionary
ribs. It contains the two main tanks located
Form factor:
Formula:
Seats:
Low wing
Tandem (intimate) two seater
Wing span: 8,46 m
MJ-77 260 hp built by Serge Séguret (Photo builder)
“Gnatsum” (an anagram of “Mustang”) is a behind the spar. It is equipped with flaps.
Wing area: 12.54 m2
two-seater (intimate) tandem aircraft made Average chord: 1.49 m
of wood, low wing and suitable for aerobat- Its retractable undercarriage can be me- Airfoil: Habib 64000 748 (NACA 747A415)
ics. chanical, electric or hydraulic, at the choice Longueur fuselage: 7.54 m
of the builder. Cabin width: 65 cm
First replica designed by Marcel Jurca, the Stabilizator span: 3.37 m
MJ-7 version at 2/3 scale appeared from Its integral bubble canopy makes it a beau- Empty weight: 998-1270 kg
Luggage weight: NC
a simple observation: by putting pairs of tiful replica of the P51D, but it has already
Max weight: 1300-1540 kg
rounded fuselage around the structure of been built in the USA in the configuration Wing load: 105-122 kg/m2
the MJ-5 Sirocco and by associating a trap- of the P51B (canopy embedded in the fu- G load factor: +4.4/-2.2 G
ezoidal wing with a dihedral, it was possible selage). Landing gear: Conventional retractable
to make a realistic replica of the P51 Mus-
tang. The demand from American home- In France, it is usually equipped with a Powertrain:
builders for a more spacious machine led 260 hp Potez 4D34 engine, while in the Engine type : Potez 4D34B, Chevy V8...
Power: 260 to 500 hp
to the MJ-77, at 3/4 scale. The plans are USA it is more often seen with a 350-450 hp
Fuel type: 100 LL / Auto
fully in English. Chevrolet V8. As the power limitation due to Propeller: Metal variable pitch / constant speed
the CNRA before 2005 is no longer current, Fuel capacity: 227 liters wings
Note that the 2/3 scale version, the MJ-7 it is recommended to increase significantly
is so little requested that the Marcel Jurca the power on this airframe. Complementary: Retractable tailwheel,
Committee stopped selling it. reinforced version for more than 400 hp.
Concerning the scale, it is a 75% replica in Welded tube fuselage available
The MJ-70 1:1 scale version was under de- dimensions, which is different from a 3/4
velopment when Marcel passed away. It will scale. Indeed, the cabin is significantly in-
never be completed. creased (85%) in order to ensure a good
habitability, without impacting the appear-
The wooden fuselage is built on the basis ance of the P51.
of a “box” with a rectangular section above
and below which are glued rounded shapes
in plywood, and on the sides of which the
shape is caught up with the help of fiber-
glassed foam. A tubular fuselage is possi-
ble, but will require a composite or sheet
metal “skin” to be made.
These data are provided for information purposes only and, as such, cannot engage the Marcel Jurca Committee for any recourse whatsoever. Do not hesitate to report possible errors
or evolutions, directly on www.marcel-jurca.com. All product names or brands mentioned in this document are registered trademarks of their respective owners. These sheets have
been designed for the Federation RSA www.rsafrance.com.
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 4 Engine: Chevrolet V8 350 cu/in Chevrolet V8 460 cu/in
Power: 345 hp at 5000 tr/min 450 hp to 5000 tr/min
Complexity: 4
Propeller: Hartzell four blades Hartzell four blades
Flying: 5 variable pitch variable pitch
Isolation: 4 Performances :
Max speed at Z=0: 400 km/h 440 km/h
Budget: 60-100 K€ Cruising speed at 75%: 370 km/h 407 km/h
VNE : 465 km/h 465 km/h
Stall speed straight (flaps) : 106 (98) km/h 112 (103) km/h
Regulation: >51% Roll take off (grass): 300 m 250 m
Take off over 15 m: <500 m <500 m
Use: Voyage Voltige Replica Roll landing (grass): 400 m environ 400 m
Vertical speed at Z=0: 2500 ft/min 2500 ft/min
Available in: Plans No kit Fuel flow: 70 l/h 90 l/h
Max distance: 1000 km 800 km
Plans’ price: 1500 €*
Construction: Wood Tubes
Particularity: Builder’s data Builder’s data
Duration: <1000 h <2500 h <3500 h >3500 h
First flight: 1968 Built: >25
Country: France *excl. postal fees
MJ-77 260 hp - Builder: Anziani (Photo builder) MJ-77 260 hp - Builder: Anziani (Photo Greenwood) MJ-77 260 hp Builder: Serge Séguret (Photo builder)
Type MJ-77 - Serial: 04 - F-PANG - 1996 - Builder: Anziani / Association Legend’air (France)
Presentation Specifications
T he Jurca MJ-8 “1-Nine-0” is a 3/4
scale replica of the Focke Wulf
190, designed by Marcel Jurca in the
A full scale version, the MJ-80, is also
available as dedicated drawings.
Form factor:
Formula:
Seats:
Low wing
Single seater
Wing span: 7.87 m
1970s. Wing area: 10.20 m2
MJ-8D FW190-D9 built by Gilles Küpfer in 2009.
their projects. One is located in Ger- Engine type : Lycoming, Continental, Vedemeyen...
Power: 200 to 400 hp
many, the other, built in Switzerland,
Fuel type: 100 LL / Auto
is now in New Zealand. The plans are Propeller: Metal variable pitch / constant speed
fully in English. Fuel capacity: 100 liters front and 100 liters wings
Complementary: N/A.
It is motorized according to the follow-
ing power ranges:
• MJ-8A: 160 hp
(not recommended, sub-motor-
ized)...
• MJ-8B: 180 to 250 hp
• MJ-8C: 251 to 300 hp
• MJ-8D: 301 to 400 hp
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 4 Engine: Lycoming IO-360 Vedemeyen 9 cylinders (diam. max 1 m)
Power: 200 hp at 2750 tr/min 400 hp
Complexity: 4
Propeller: Metal variable pitch Metal three-blades variable pitch
Flying: 5
Performances:
Isolation: 5 Max speed at Z=0: 257 km/h 360 km/h
Cruising speed at 75%: 230 km/h 320 km/h
Budget: 60-100 K€ VNE : 500 km/h 500 km/h
Stall speed straight (flaps): 90 (NC) km/h 100 (NC) km/h
Roll take off (grass): 210 m 150 m
Regulation: >51% Take off over 15 m: <500 m <500 m
Roll landing (grass): NC NC
Use: Replica Vertical speed at Z=0: NC NC
Fuel flow: 40 l/h 80 l/h
Available in: Plans No kit Max distance: NC NC
Plans’ price: 1500 €*
Construction: Wood Particularity: Designer’s data Designer’s data
(minimal performances)
Duration: <1000 h >3500 h
First flight: 1975 Built: 5+
Country: France *excl. postal fees
Wing of the MJ-8 replica of the FW190-D9 built by Gilles Crossing of the MJ-8 built by Gilles Küpfer (Photo builder) First workshop exit, before hoisting, of the MJ-8 built by
Küpfer (Photo builder) Gilles Küpfer (Photo builder)
Presentation Specifications
T he Jurca MJ80 “1-Nine-0” is a Form factor:
Formula: Low wing
replica of the Focke Wulf 190 in full
MJ-80 built by Ulrich Bronner in Germany in 2006 (photo
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 5 Engine: Pratt & Whitney R985 Pratt & Whitney R1830
Power: 450 hp 1200 hp
Complexity: 5
Propeller: Hartzell three blades 110’’ Hartzell three blades
Flying: 5
Performances:
Isolation: 5 Max speed at Z=5000 ft : 402 km/h 571 km/h
Cruising speed at 75% 5000 ft : 330 km/h 483 km/h
Budget: 100-300 K€ VNE: 500 km/h (mandatory) 500 km/h (mandatory)
Stall speed straight (flaps): NC (96) km/h NC (110) km/h
Roll take off (grass): 300 m 300 m
Regulation: >51% Take off over 15 m: NC NC
Roll landing (grass): 600 m 600 m
Use: Replica Vertical speed at Z=0: 2200 ft/min 3400 ft/min
Fuel flow: 95 l/h 250 l/h
Available in: Plans No kit Max distance: 1000 km 900 km
Plans’ price: 1500 €*
Construction: Wood Particularity: Builder’s data Builder’s data
Duration: >3500 h
First flight: 2006 Built: 4+
Country: France *excl. postal fees
Ulrich Bronner’s MJ-80 during a visit of Marcel Jurca (build- Ulrich Bronner’s MJ-80 with DC3 engine (builder’s photo)
er’s photo)
Presentation Specifications
T he Jurca MJ-10 Spitfire is a 75% A full scale version exists, named MJ- Form factor:
Formula: Low wing
replica of the British World War II 100 with dedicated drawings.
MJ10 Spitfire 75% of Walter Haug and his son Stephane
These data are provided for information purposes only and, as such, cannot engage the Marcel Jurca Committee for any recourse whatsoever. Do not hesitate to report possible errors
or evolutions, directly on www.marcel-jurca.com. All product names or brands mentioned in this document are registered trademarks of their respective owners. These sheets have
been designed for the Federation RSA www.rsafrance.com.
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 4 Engine: Chevrolet SB V8 400C
Power: 330 hp at 4600 tr/min
Complexity: 4
Propeller: Metal three blades
Flying: 5 variable pitch Mühlbauer,
MTV-9-E-C/CL240-27X,
Isolation: 4
Performances:
Budget: 60-100 K€ Max speed at Z=0: 300 km/h
Cruising speed at 75%: 278 km/h
VNE : 425 km/h
Regulation: >51% Stall speed straight (flaps): 94 (83) km/h
Roll take off (grass): 210 m
Use: Replica Take off over 15 m: 420 m
Roll landing (grass): 400 m
Available in: Plans No kit Vertical speed at Z=0: 1650 ft/min
Fuel flow: 60 l/h
Plans’ price: 1500 €* Max distance: NC
Construction: Wood Tube
Duration: >3500 h Particularity: Builder’s data
MJ-10 Spitfire 75% built by Walter and Stéphane Haug in 2004, Switzerland. (Photo builders) Fuselage of Alain Rougetet’s MJ-10, under construc-
tion in Les Mureaux, France (Photo builder)
Presentation Specifications
T he MJ-100 is the 1:1 scale evolu- The flight controls are similar to the Form factor:
Fuselage tubes and Allison 1325 hp engine. (Photo Frederick A. John-
Decision Performance
Powertrain:
Difficulty: 5 Engine: Allison V12 V-1710-87
Power: 1325 hp at 3200 tr/min.
Complexity: 5
Propeller: DC3 three blades
Flying: 5 (max power at 1800 tr/min.)
Isolation: 4 Performances:
Max speed at Z=0 : 500 km/h (mandatory)
Budget: 150-300 K€ Cruising speed at 75% : 354 km/h
VNE : 500 km/h (mandatory)
Stall speed straight (flaps): 112 (100) km/h
Regulation: >51% Roll take off (hard): 450 m
Take off over 15 m: NC
Use: Replica Roll landing (hard): NC
Vertical speed at Z=0: 2000 ft/min
Available in: Plans Not kit Fuel flow: 208 l/h
Max distance 65% : 600 km
Plans’ price: 1500 €*
Construction: Wood Tube
Particularity: Builder’s data
Duration: >3500 h
First flight: 1994 Built: 3+
Country: France *excl. postal fees
Wooden fuselage of the MJ-100 under construction by Aile en bois de Jean-Patrick Dubois à Reims, France (photo Wooden tailplane on fuselage tubes and sheets of Bob
Claude Martin near Bordeaux, France (Photo builder) constructeur) Deford, USA (Builder’s photo)
MJ-3
“Dart”
Single-seater MJ-2 Tempête with
a wing of MJ-5 Sirocco retractable
Restricted
landing gear, very little diffused nor
built.
MJ-6 & 66
“Crivats”
Wooden twin-engine, tandem MJ-6
Unavailable
or side-by-side MJ-66.
MJ-7
“Gnatsum” 2/3
2/3 scale replica of P51 Mustang
requiring great building skills.
Restricted
Restricted
ing great building skills from a
limited set of plans. One is at the
end of construction in Germany
(photo).
MJ-11
“Sea Fury”
Full scale replica of the Hawker
Unavailable
Sea Fury. It hasn’t been finalized.
MJ-12
“Pee 40”
3/4 scale replica of the Curtiss P40
requiring high construction skills.
Restricted
MJ-14
“Fourtouna”
Wooden racer with ovoid fuselage
Unavailable
and trapezoidal wing.
MJ-15
“Delta”
Two-seater tandem with delta
Unavailable
wing, its motorization goes from
200 to 600 hp.
MJ-16
“Vent”
If the calculation file exists, the
Unavailable
Unavailable
Twin-Mustang! Imagine two MJ-2
Tempête fuselages on an extend-
ed wing.
MJ-23
“Orage”
A supercharged version of the
Unavailable
MJ-2 Tempête, from which it takes
the tailplane, it was calculated with
an MJ-55 Biso wing for its 300 hp
version and with the MJ-2 wing for
the 200 hp version.
MJ-25
“Bise”
An attempt at a single-seater
Unavailable
MJ-52
“Zéphyr”
Lightweight Autan prototype
(two-seater, 80 hp or 180 hp side
Restricted
by side), two copies of which one
is currently being built.
MJ-55
“Biso”
An aerobatic two-seater, made of
a fuselage of the MJ-5 Sirocco and
Restricted
a flat trapezoidal wing.
MJ-70
“Gnatsum” 1/1
Last project of Marcel Jurca, he
Unavailable
Photo Wikipedia
First name Name The signatory understands that no warranty, express or implied, is being given by the CMJ as to the accuracy, airwor-
thiness, suitability or flyability of the construction drawings or the aircraft to be built with the drawings or that the
aircraft once built is able to be certified by the National Aviation Agency of his country.
Profession:
Postal address: Country: The signatory shall accept full legal responsibility for the construction, certification, flight or operation of the aircraft
and hold totally and completely harmless from any legal liability or damages whatsoever the principals, the CMJ, Mar-
Phone: cel Jurca’s heirs and their beneficiaries. Further understand that any aircraft constructed with the Plans shall only be
built and operated in strict compliance with Regulations promulgated by the National Aviation Agency of his country.
E-mail:
The signatory also acknowledges that these drawings were prepared by Marcel Jurca makes no guarantees as to their
Hereinafter referred to as “the signatory”, hereby request, in order to build as an amateur, to be sent a set of plans accuracy or currency. It is also agreed that while the CMJ will try to direct any questions regarding the drawings and
of an amateur-built aircraft MJ- , and agree formally, on the honor, the following License Agreement [A / to E /]: construction to experienced builders, the CMJ itself cannot provide any technical builder support.
A / Drawings use All subsequent signatory, buyers, heirs, successors, or assigns are also bound by all terms of this agreement.
The drawings are copyrighted and remain the property of the CMJ.
The set of construction drawings will not be communicated, reproduced or sold without the written permission of the Consequently, it is expressly stipulated that the signatory, the undersigned,
CMJ.
The building license agreement shall only be used for a single copy of the aircraft object of this commitment, to the First name Name
exclusion of any commercial purpose.
In order to get its Certificate of Airworthiness, the aircraft reproduced from these drawings should have its own License will exclusively take all risks that could result from the construction, implementation or operation of the aircraft in
Agreement and a valid serial number related to the name of the signatory. accordance with the record that was provided by the CMJ.
There will be no exchanges or refunds for the set of construction drawings and/or the building license agreement.
[In this frame, precede the date and signature with the handwriting «read and approved» of signatory]
B / Construction
The aircraft will be built according to the State of the Art and will be strictly conform to the construction drawings,
with the materials and corresponding settings exactly to specifications.
The weight and balance remain within the limits defined in the construction drawings. City: Date: Signature:
The signatory will make no change, however small, unless formally agreed, written of the CMJ.
The signatory will control the construction by the competent authority according to the regulations of his country. The
CMJ keeps the right to enforce, under the control of the competent authority, any changes it considers necessary to the
aircraft under construction or in use, without any compensation.
Any modification or improvement occurred during the construction or development on the ground or in flight cannot Construction license agreement [To be completed by the CMJ representative]
change this License Agreement. The CMJ may solely integrate these changes into the standard drawings without any
compensation. This commitment matches the building license agreement No.
Given the multitude of available engines, the study of respective engine mount and is under the responsibility of the
signatory.
Given the evolution of aircraft instrumentation and electrical practices, these equipments are under the responsibility
For one copy of the aircraft type MJ-
of the signatory.
Issued date:
Comité Marcel Jurca
Committee Marcel Jurca - CMJ - Comité Marcel Jurca - Committee Marcel Jurca - CMJ
Committee Marcel Jurca - CMJ - Comité Marcel Jurca - Committee Marcel Jurca - CMJ
Aérodrome de Nangis Les Loges - 77370 Clos Fontaine - France To Mr / Ms:
www.marcel-jurca.com - info@marcel-jurca.com
March
Comité Marcel Jurca - Committee Marcel Jurca - CMJ - Comité Marcel Jurca - Committee Marcel Jurca - CMJ - Comité Marcel Jurca
2020
My builders’ contacts
Contact
Name: ____________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
Phone: ____________________________________________________________________________
Email: ____________________________________________________________________________
Notes: ____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Name: ____________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
Phone: ____________________________________________________________________________
Email: ____________________________________________________________________________
Notes: ____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Name: ____________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
Phone: ____________________________________________________________________________
Email: ____________________________________________________________________________
Notes: ____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
www.marcel-jurca.com